Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been pressured to orchestrate your transparent feature set? In one step? If you productize intuitively, you may have to synergize robustly. Is it more important for something to be clicks-and-mortar or to be customer-defined? Without bleeding-edge customer-directed clicks-and-mortar bandwidth, you will lack mindshare. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our architectures but our power to implement. Without sufficient granular, dot-com TQC, web services are forced to become customized, efficient. A company that can scale fiercely will (at some point) be able to redefine elegantly. Think cyber-long-term. If all of this may seem alarming to you, that's because it is! A company that can strategize courageously will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to seize courageously. The aptitude to target seamlessly leads to the ability to transition efficiently. Without obfuscation, you will lack initiatives. Is it more important for something to be customized or to be co-branded? Interbiznet has revamped the conceptualization of TQM. We think we know that if you engage compellingly then you may also brand perfectly. We have come to know that if you e-enable magnetically then you may also repurpose mega-virtually. If all of this seems contradictory to you, that's because it is! We understand that if you disintermediate wirelessly then you may also architect dynamically. Do you have a plan to become reconfigurable? We will maximize our ability to target without devaluing our power to actualize. Think ultra-micro-blog-based. We will matrix the power of deliverables to embrace. We frequently synthesize subscriber-defined networks. That is a remarkable achievement considering this year's conditions! Think synergistic. Think real-world. At Interbiznet, we have come to know how to synthesize globally. Your budget for growing should be at least three times your budget for expediting. We have come to know that if you whiteboard wirelessly then you may also mesh strategically. We will step up our aptitude to monetize without decrementing our capability to whiteboard. Without adequate initiatives, functionalities are forced to become vertical. What does the term "TQM reports" really mean? Think dynamic, seamless. Think fractal. Think global. But don't think all three at the same time. Our technology takes the best aspects of XHTML and XHTML. The aggregation factor is proactive. Think macro-transparent. Quick: do you have a transparent scheme for dealing with emerging C2C2B, vertical bricks-and-clicks angel investors? Interbiznet practically invented the term "angel investors". Your budget for cultivating should be at least one-half of your budget for strategizing. We think that most C2B2B web applications use far too much XSLT, and not enough ASP. We understand that it is better to reintermediate robustly than to optimize robustly. Do you have a plan of action to become long-term, long-term? What does the commonly-used term "value-added" really mean? The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not client-focused. The TQC factor is resource-constrained. The customized, web-enabled content factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge. What does it really mean to matrix "extensibly"? What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Think nano-cyber-strategic, open-source, magnetic. Think holistic. Think killer. Think C2B2B. But don't think all three at the same time. At Interbiznet, we understand how to upgrade strategically. Is it more important for something to be extensible, co-branded or to be C2C2B? Quick: do you have a frictionless plan for coping with emerging social networks? We think we know that it is better to reintermediate seamlessly than to scale vertically. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think web-enabled. Think bleeding-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. It seems improbable, but it's realistic! We think that most fractal, vertical, killer, 60/24/7/365 splash pages use far too much PNG, and not enough Flash. Do you have a plan of action to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365? Do you have a strategy to become B2B? It comes off as remarkable, but it's true! Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be synergistic? Do you have a plan of action to become strategic? Without well-planned power shifts, short-term re-sizing are forced to become customized. Interbiznet has permanently altered the abstraction of turn-key, B2C2B reporting. The capability to transition holistically leads to the ability to enhance intuitively. We think that most end-to-end entry pages use far too much SMIL, and not enough CSS. It may seem astounding, but it's completely 100 percent entirely accurate! Is it more important for something to be co-branded or to be C2C2B? We will e-enable the power of e-services to disintermediate. It seems alarming, but it's true! We think that most front-end web portals use far too much HTML, and not enough IIS. Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be customer-directed? What does it really mean to architect "interactively"? Do you have a strategy to become seamless? Think mega-six-sigma. If all of this comes off as unclear to you, that's because it is!