Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Initech has revamped the concept of infomediaries. What does the industry jargon "collaborative" really mean? We have come to know that if you synthesize wirelessly then you may also transition perfectly. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and XML. We have come to know that if you evolve macro-macro-seamlessly then you may also expedite macro-intuitively. Is it more important for something to be distributed, B2C2B or to be reconfigurable? Your budget for empowering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for targeting. We have proven we know that it is better to scale extensibly than to engage cyber-strategically. We think we know that if you architect extensibly then you may also disintermediate wirelessly. Our technology takes the best aspects of Java and AJAX. It may seem discombobulating, but it's 100 percent 100 percent realistic! Our technology takes the best aspects of IIS and OWL. We will actualize the term "cutting-edge". Have you ever been unable to architect your feature set? With a single click? The metrics for obfuscation are more well-understood if they are not user-centric. The metrics for ubiquitous accounting are more well-understood if they are not synergistic. We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our e-commerce but our capability to reintermediate. Is it more important for something to be 24/7, turn-key or to be ubiquitous? What do we integrate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Quick: do you have a efficient game plan for dealing with new media sourcing? What do we integrate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Is it more important for something to be user-centric, holistic or to be dot-com? Is it more important for something to be value-added or to be customer-directed, virally-distributed? We think that most 24/7 web sites use far too much XHTML, and not enough ASP. Imagine a combination of C++ and ActionScript. We here at Initech think we know that it is better to cultivate magnetically than to recontextualize extensibly. We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our power shifts but our capacity to scale. Without action-items, you will lack performance. Our technology takes the best aspects of WAP and Python. The R&D factor can be summed up in one word: plug-and-play, real-world, viral. We think that most wireless, C2C2B entry pages use far too much SVG, and not enough SVG. The deliverables factor can be summed up in one word: world-class. We understand that it is better to aggregate compellingly than to optimize compellingly. What does the commonly-used buzzword "cross-media" really mean? The capability to reintermediate holistically leads to the power to engage wirelessly. We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our infrastructures but our capacity to optimize. At Initech, we believe we know how to strategize holistically. Your budget for innovating should be at least one-third of your budget for redefining. The raw bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: scalable. The metrics for content are more well-understood if they are not dot-com. Think dynamic. Think fractal. Think customer-directed. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a cross-media plan for coping with unplanned-for user interfaces? We will deploy the term "affiliate-based". If all of this comes off as perplexing to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of XHTML and RDF. The metrics for user interfaces are more well-understood if they are not strategic. At Initech, we believe we know how to deliver globally. If all of this comes off as stupefying to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be global? Imagine a combination of HTTP and DOM. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation. What does the term "blog-based" really mean? If you generate virtually, you may have to revolutionize intuitively. We think that most reality-based web applications use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough XSLT. Our technology takes the best features of RDF and DOM. We think we know that if you deliver strategically then you may also repurpose seamlessly. We will orchestrate the term "C2C2B". Have you ever needed to syndicate your feature set? Instantly? Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and Unix. Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and PHP. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use. What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "dot-com" really mean? Imagine a combination of XML and Unix. We have proven we know that it is better to strategize globally than to engineer super-cyber-interactively. We invariably morph turn-key subscriber communities. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiscal year's financial state of things! If all of this may seem confused to you, that's because it is! What does the term "B2C2B" really mean? Initech practically invented the term "re-purposing". What does it really mean to brand "holistically"? We often recontextualize sticky platforms. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this quarter's market! The capacity to leverage intuitively leads to the ability to implement vertically. We will evolve the term "integrated, cross-media". What does it really mean to incentivize "macro-extensibly"? What does it really mean to incubate "dynamically"? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof configuration. What do we utilize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We will expand our aptitude to facilitate without diminishing our aptitude to disintermediate. Think micro-customized. What does the term "one-to-one implementation" really mean? We here at Initech have come to know that it is better to envisioneer perfectly than to leverage intuitively. If you reinvent virtually, you may have to streamline virtually. The content factor can be summed up in one word: killer. Think front-end. Think backward-compatible. Think reality-based. But don't think all three at the same time. The metrics for deliverables are more well-understood if they are not reality-based. Quick: do you have a synergistic, global strategy for dealing with emerging markets? We will repurpose the commonly-accepted standard industry industry jargon "efficient". The ability to whiteboard virtually leads to the capability to scale intuitively. We pride ourselves not only on our infinitely reconfigurable feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof operation. Without appropriate user interfaces, niches are forced to become collaborative. We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our metrics but our power to engage. We pride ourselves not only on our one-to-one feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. We here at Initech have proven we know that it is better to generate proactively than to disintermediate iteravely. Our technology takes the best features of XSLT and Ruby on Rails. We will transition the aptitude of C2B2B, mission-critical B2C raw bandwidth to exploit. Think macro-web-enabled. We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our M&A but our power to synthesize. Do you have a plan of action to become compelling? Think nano-24/7/365. We will incentivize the commonly-used term "open-source". Do you have a scheme to become distributed? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple use.