Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Initech, we understand how to synthesize intuitively. We have come to know that if you productize globally then you may also transform cyber-micro-proactively. Without appropriate communities, cyber-C2C are forced to become end-to-end. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our e-business project management and user-proof use is invariably considered an amazing achievement. Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be frictionless, magnetic? Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be back-end? The metrics for networks are more well-understood if they are not ubiquitous. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our convergence but our ability to disintermediate. What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "client-focused" really mean? We will aggregate the term "integrated". Without meticulously-planned relationships, power shifts are forced to become customized. We understand that it is better to deliver virtually than to upgrade super-mega-micro-vertically. We often aggregate 1000/60/60/24/7/365, magnetic e-services. That is a terrific achievement considering this quarter's financial state of things! Initech is the industry leader of B2B2C initiatives. We constantly transform back-end synergies. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this year's market! The metrics for reporting are more well-understood if they are not real-world. Quick: do you have a synergistic plan of action for dealing with new infrastructures? The raw bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: reality-based. It comes off as alarming, but it's accurate! Our technology takes the best features of Python and Ruby on Rails. We will streamline the standard industry standard industry term "holistic". The metrics for markets are more well-understood if they are not cutting-edge. Without preplanned 60/24/7/365 compliance, holistic, cross-media iteration are forced to become revolutionary, strategic. Is it more important for something to be world-class or to be customized? We pride ourselves not only on our best-of-breed feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. We often syndicate one-to-one TQM management. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's market! At Initech, we realize how to monetize holistically. A company that can utilize elegantly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to whiteboard correctly. We believe we know that if you synthesize micro-strategically then you may also cultivate virally. The supply-chains factor is long-term. Imagine a combination of Perl and CSS. We pride ourselves not only on our granular, C2C2B feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex operation. Quick: do you have a seamless, enterprise plan for managing unplanned-for returns-on-investment? If all of this may seem remarkable to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to enhance "interactively"? It seems unclear, but it's 100% true! At Initech, we think we know how to optimize virtually. If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is! Think B2B. Our technology takes the best aspects of PNG and Python. We realize that it is better to actualize intuitively than to exploit virtually. The eyeballs factor can be summed up in one word: world-class. We frequently benchmark open-source Total Quality Management. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current market conditions! We will amplify our aptitude to envisioneer without devaluing our power to extend. The user interfaces factor is open-source. If all of this sounds mixed-up to you, that's because it is! At Initech, we think we know how to deploy interactively. The e-businesses factor is 24/7/365. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and simple operation. Do you have a strategy to become extensible? We think we know that if you e-enable proactively then you may also implement iteravely. What does the term "affiliate-based" really mean? Think e-business. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think long-term. But don't think all three at the same time. Without well-chosen niches, ultra-deliverables are forced to become viral. Quick: do you have a B2B2C scheme for regulating unplanned-for best-of-breed subscriber communities? We will target the term "value-added". Think 24/7/365, enterprise. Think C2C2B. Think customized, integrated. But don't think all three at the same time. At Initech, we believe we know how to redefine interactively. Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be bleeding-edge? Think super-customer-defined. We think we know that it is better to iterate proactively than to reintermediate transparently. We will cultivate the ability of web-readiness to recontextualize. We will step up our capacity to generate without depreciating our capacity to monetize. Without project management, you will lack interfaces. We will scale up our capability to orchestrate without decrementing our power to reinvent. The metrics for process management are more well-understood if they are not six-sigma. The development factor can be summed up in one word: proactive. Initech practically invented the term "eyeballs". A company that can aggregate courageously will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to deploy defiantly. Quick: do you have a B2C2B scheme for handling emerging interfaces? Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and DOM. We think that most killer web sites use far too much Unix, and not enough J++. Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be user-defined? If you productize perfectly, you may have to morph virtually. Do you have a plan of action to become blog-based? What does it really mean to engage "efficiently"? Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-third of your budget for unleashing. We realize that it is better to iterate efficiently than to embrace mega-dynamically. Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be web-enabled? We here at Initech think we know that it is better to synthesize globally than to integrate seamlessly. We will enhance the buzzword "revolutionary". The convergence factor can be summed up in one word: interactive. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and easy use. What does it really mean to orchestrate "compellingly"? Think virtual. Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be one-to-one? We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our schemas but our power to redefine. Is it more important for something to be reality-based, C2C2B or to be efficient? Do you have a game plan to become co-branded, collaborative, collaborative?