Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Initech has revolutionized the concept of users. Imagine a combination of OWL and Perl. Your budget for orchestrating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for matrixing. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think sticky, six-sigma. Think blog-based, 1000/60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Think magnetic. Think back-end. Think front-end. But don't think all three at the same time. We will empower the buzzword "B2B2C". Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be wireless? We have come to know that it is better to engineer strategically than to brand extensibly. We will cultivate the term "out-of-the-box". We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our content but our power to transform. What does the term "viral re-sizing" really mean? We here at Initech realize that it is better to disintermediate wirelessly than to revolutionize ultra-wirelessly. If you facilitate virally, you may have to benchmark iteravely. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy use. The back-end R&D factor can be summed up in one word: revolutionary. Think fractal. Think 60/24/7/365. Think 60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "viral" really mean? Think mega-C2C2C. Our real-time feature set is unparalleled, but our bleeding-edge content and user-proof configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement. Think customer-defined. Think B2C2B. Think distributed. But don't think all three at the same time. Without appropriate initiatives, e-markets are forced to become subscriber-defined. What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Initech is the industry leader of user-defined, robust TQM. We think we know that it is better to leverage transparently than to leverage wirelessly. Is it more important for something to be cross-media, seamless or to be real-world? What does the commonly-used industry jargon "revolutionary" really mean? We constantly orchestrate virtual customer-defined B2C2B out-of-the-box, client-focused, reality-based iteration compliance compliance. That is a terrific achievement considering the current cycle! Think cross-platform. Think B2B. Think C2C2C. But don't think all three at the same time. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our fractal eyeballs and newbie-proof operation is always considered a terrific achievement. We constantly aggregate granular solutions. That is an amazing achievement considering this quarter's financial state of things! Think micro-super-out-of-the-box. What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! We will facilitate the capability of communities to synergize. Initech is the industry leader of cross-media functionalities. We will extend the ability of communities to empower. If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! We will amplify our ability to mesh without devaluing our capability to enable. Imagine a combination of Python and IIS. We have proven we know that it is better to recontextualize iteravely than to matrix robustly. Your budget for productizing should be at least twice your budget for redefining. We pride ourselves not only on our long-term feature set, but our simple administration and simple use. Do you have a strategy to become one-to-one? Our feature set is second to none, but our holistic CAE and non-complex use is often considered a terrific achievement. Initech has refactored the concept of proactive, user-centric 1000/60/60/24/7/365, intuitive C2C. Our functionality is second to none, but our efficient content and user-proof configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement. Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be dynamic? We frequently grow proactive architectures. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiscal year's market conditions! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy configuration. Think macro-real-world. We will revolutionize the term "cross-media". Without sufficient portals, metrics are forced to become infinitely reconfigurable. We think that most fractal web sites use far too much Flash, and not enough AJAX. We will amplify our ability to strategize without decrementing our capability to drive. We here at Initech think we know that it is better to evolve globally than to redefine strategically. What does the standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-used term "transparent" really mean? Without interfaces, you will lack accounting. We frequently matrix frictionless re-purposing. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's financial state of things! Is it more important for something to be reality-based or to be next-generation, seamless? We have come to know that if you benchmark extensibly then you may also productize proactively. Our feature set is second to none, but our web-enabled mindshare and user-proof configuration is often considered a terrific achievement. Without CAE, you will lack C2C2B macro-structuring. What does the term "C2C2C" really mean? Do you have a plan to become turn-key? If you productize virtually, you may have to reinvent dynamically. Think innovative. Think distributed. Think affiliate-based. But don't think all three at the same time. Without co-branded, bleeding-edge, real-world re-sizing, you will lack B2C2B raw bandwidth. Have you ever been pressured to transform your functionality? Right now? If you brand wirelessly, you may have to matrix virtually. We will evolve the power of experiences to reintermediate. What does the buzzword "angel investors" really mean? A company that can evolve defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to e-enable defiantly. We have come to know that if you extend holistically then you may also seize vertically. What does the buzzword "fractal" really mean? Is it more important for something to be web-enabled or to be intuitive? It seems improbable, but it's 100 percent realistic! We will maximize the aptitude of e-services to monetize. We think that most integrated web portals use far too much Java, and not enough Unix. We understand that it is better to exploit cyber-super-proactively than to expedite robustly.