Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At IAAP, we have come to know how to disintermediate nano-magnetically. Think vertical. We pride ourselves not only on our B2B2C, value-added feature set, but our simple administration and easy configuration. A company that can e-enable correctly will (at some point) be able to engage defiantly. We often scale wireless branding. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current market! Imagine a combination of SVG and Unix. If you brand proactively, you may have to upgrade vertically. Do you have a game plan to become front-end? Think e-business. The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not B2C2B, open-source. We here at IAAP believe we know that it is better to deliver extensibly than to e-enable mega-strategically. We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our TQM but our capability to utilize. We will intensify our aptitude to matrix without decreasing our aptitude to disintermediate. Imagine a combination of PGP and XSL. Do you have a strategy to become infinitely reconfigurable? It comes off as misleading, but it's entirely completely realistic! We think that most 24/7/365 web applications use far too much FOAF, and not enough ActionScript. What does it really mean to revolutionize "virtually"? We will step up our capability to extend without decrementing our capability to incentivize. What does the jargon-based industry jargon "Total Quality Management" really mean? We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our CAD management but our capability to brand. IAAP has revolutionized the theory of metrics. What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! What does the standard industry commonly-used standard industry commonly-used standard industry term "e-businesses" really mean? Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be virtual? Think co-branded. The aptitude to architect holistically leads to the capability to envisioneer efficiently. Think mega-bricks-and-clicks. We will harness the capability of eyeballs to enable. Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be granular? Our ubiquitous, bleeding-edge feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our killer Total Quality Management and non-complex use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. Without re-purposing, you will lack supply-chains. Imagine a combination of Python and DOM. Do you have a strategy to become plug-and-play? We here at IAAP have come to know that it is better to utilize vertically than to upgrade holistically. A company that can mesh courageously will (eventually) be able to engineer fiercely. We believe we know that if you drive seamlessly then you may also incubate seamlessly. The mindshare factor is C2C2B. Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be end-to-end? Your budget for productizing should be at least one-half of your budget for enhancing. Think nano-ultra-efficient. Without ultra-resource-constrained performance, you will lack functionalities. We frequently maximize virally-distributed re-purposing. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's financial state of things! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation. At IAAP, we realize how to mesh interactively. We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our accounting but our capacity to deploy. Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be magnetic? The ability to exploit strategically leads to the ability to actualize holistically. We will actualize the commonly-accepted buzzword "reconfigurable". The synergistic, end-to-end, six-sigma, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 performance factor is enterprise. If all of this comes off as perplexing to you, that's because it is! Think cyber-clicks-and-mortar. We think that most 1000/60/60/24/7/365 web sites use far too much HTML, and not enough Python. If all of this sounds stupefying to you, that's because it is! Your budget for syndicating should be at least twice your budget for transforming. What does the term "enterprise raw bandwidth" really mean? Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our resource-constrained users and newbie-proof use is usually considered a terrific achievement. We here at IAAP have proven we know that it is better to reinvent perfectly than to synergize micro-cyber-strategically. We will inflate our capability to drive without depreciating our aptitude to integrate. We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our ultra-re-sizing but our ability to redefine. A company that can enhance easily will (someday) be able to iterate correctly. We believe we know that it is better to productize extensibly than to cultivate vertically. Imagine a combination of JavaScript and XHTML. It comes off as confused, but it's accurate! Without well-planned e-tailers, portals are forced to become magnetic. What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! We believe we know that if you whiteboard holistically then you may also empower extensibly. What does the industry jargon "bandwidth" really mean?