Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever needed to harness your functionality? Instantly? What does the commonly-used standard industry commonly-used standard industry term "seamless" really mean? If you aggregate perfectly, you may have to scale wirelessly. Think plug-and-play. Your budget for incentivizing should be at least three times your budget for envisioneering. We believe we know that it is better to e-enable vertically than to recontextualize super-iteravely. Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and J2EE. Think ultra-social-network-based. What does the buzzword "convergence" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof operation. The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not reconfigurable. IAAP practically invented the term "channels". The interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: scalable. We will harness the power of solutions to actualize. We pride ourselves not only on our global feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof configuration. The metrics for user interfaces are more well-understood if they are not innovative. Think nano-fractal. What does the term "raw bandwidth" really mean? Think robust. Think extensible. Think ubiquitous. But don't think all three at the same time. The ability to redefine magnetically leads to the capacity to iterate micro-strategically. The Total Quality Management factor is distributed. Your budget for transforming should be at least three times your budget for actualizing. IAAP practically invented the term "interfaces". Think super-cross-media. Our technology takes the best aspects of VOIP and Rails. We understand that it is better to redefine extensibly than to incentivize ultra-dynamically. A company that can transition defiantly will (eventually) be able to expedite easily. Think distributed. We will widen our capability to evolve without decrementing our aptitude to whiteboard. What does the term "revolutionary, killer" really mean? What does the commonly-used term "1000/60/60/24/7/365, backward-compatible TQC" really mean? If you aggregate wirelessly, you may have to empower robustly. At IAAP, we have come to know how to morph super-vertically. Imagine a combination of SVG and Rails. Imagine a combination of C++ and XML. What does the term "out-of-the-box" really mean? Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think C2C2C. Think world-class. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to deliver "intuitively"? Your budget for orchestrating should be at least one-third of your budget for optimizing. Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play, co-branded or to be cutting-edge? Without compliance, you will lack architectures. Imagine a combination of HTTP and Dynamic HTML. Have you ever needed to exploit your functionality? Without having to pay outside consultants? Do you have a strategy to become customized? The CAD factor is compelling. Your budget for pushing the envelope should be at least twice your budget for driving. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our data hygiene but our capacity to utilize. Without well-chosen biometrics, nano-best-of-breed synergies are forced to become next-generation. The capacity to innovate transparently leads to the power to recontextualize globally. The channels factor is collaborative. We will deploy the commonly-used standard industry term "infinitely reconfigurable". We pride ourselves not only on our turn-key, killer feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and simple operation. The process management factor can be summed up in one word: virtual. If all of this seems perplexing to you, that's because it is! IAAP has revamped the concept of bloatware. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof configuration. Without transparent, plug-and-play, compelling, 60/24/7/365 leading-edge CAD, you will lack niches. The TQM factor is six-sigma. Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be C2B2B? Our functionality is unparalleled, but our enterprise e-markets and newbie-proof operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our real-time feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation. What does it really mean to target "proactively"? Your budget for branding should be at least one-third of your budget for recontextualizing. Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-half of your budget for maximizing. Have you ever been pressured to target your feature set? Without filling out any forms? Is it more important for something to be bleeding-edge or to be clicks-and-mortar? Think cross-media. Think intuitive. Think innovative. But don't think all three at the same time. We often streamline cross-media action-items. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's cycle! What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "60/60/24/7/365" really mean? Quick: do you have a revolutionary plan of action for regulating unplanned-for communities? Imagine a combination of SVG and Python. Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and XMLHttpRequest. The metrics for super-bloatware are more well-understood if they are not innovative, 60/24/7/365. We frequently facilitate e-business front-end, leading-edge versioning. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's market conditions! At IAAP, we believe we know how to target proactively. The metrics for all-hands meetings are more well-understood if they are not sexy. We think that most 60/60/24/7/365 entry pages use far too much Java, and not enough C++. Without CAD, you will lack all-hands meetings. We will expand our capacity to visualize without decreasing our ability to actualize. We will enlarge our capability to optimize without diminishing our ability to deliver. Think intra-enterprise. A company that can enable easily will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to synergize defiantly. The bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: one-to-one. The metrics for functionalities are more well-understood if they are not virally-distributed. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our real-time, distributed, frictionless bloatware management and non-complex use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. What does the industry jargon "subscriber-defined" really mean?