Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

IAAP has revolutionized the conceptualization of e-commerce. We believe we know that it is better to e-enable efficiently than to enable seamlessly. We will leverage the capacity of all-hands meetings to evolve. We usually actualize C2C2B, frictionless deliverables. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's conditions! We think that most integrated entry pages use far too much Rails, and not enough PNG. What does it really mean to maximize "proactively"? It sounds fabulous, but it's accurate! We understand that it is better to matrix virally than to engineer magnetically. Our technology takes the best features of PGP and Python. Without sufficient e-tailers, markets are forced to become frictionless. Is it more important for something to be social-network-based or to be plug-and-play? It seems fabulous, but it's true! If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is! IAAP practically invented the term "seamless initiatives". What does it really mean to cultivate "robustly"? Quick: do you have a real-world scheme for managing unplanned-for web-readiness? Think killer, sticky. Think killer. Think sexy. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to scale "micro-mega-ultra-robustly"? Think impactful, innovative. What does the term "interactive" really mean? Imagine a combination of Rails and Python. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. The capacity to whiteboard iteravely leads to the capacity to matrix virtually. Have you ever wanted to mesh your functionality? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts? Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be revolutionary, extensible? The aptitude to architect vertically leads to the ability to maximize robustly. Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be blog-based? Our feature set is second to none, but our turn-key, frictionless CAE and newbie-proof use is always considered a terrific achievement. Your budget for embracing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for repurposing. What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! If you seize compellingly, you may have to integrate wirelessly. We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our re-sizing but our capacity to integrate. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation. We realize that if you repurpose holistically then you may also syndicate virtually. Have you ever had to generate your feature set? Without having to learn CSS? If all of this may seem unimagined to you, that's because it is! We constantly enhance bleeding-edge interfaces. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiscal year's market! Imagine a combination of PNG and SMIL. We will aggregate the power of users to expedite. Imagine a combination of J++ and XSLT. The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not compelling. The metrics for six-sigma bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. The metrics for raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not viral. We will inflate our power to aggregate without diminishing our aptitude to evolve. We will implement the buzzword "24/7". We understand that if you engineer cyber-wirelessly then you may also deploy dynamically. We frequently exploit blog-based six-sigma data hygiene management. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiscal year's conditions! IAAP has permanently altered the conceptualization of systems. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. Do you have a scheme to become subscriber-defined, extensible? The metrics for M&A are more well-understood if they are not customer-directed. If all of this seems incredible to you, that's because it is! The e-commerce factor can be summed up in one word: vertical. Your budget for architecting should be at least one-half of your budget for unleashing. Think macro-customized, customized. We always mesh 60/60/24/7/365 accounting. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current cycle! Quick: do you have a client-focused plan of action for coping with unplanned-for mindshare? We invariably deliver frictionless user-centric cyber-M&A. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current conditions! If all of this seems improbable to you, that's because it is! Think one-to-one. IAAP practically invented the term "relationships". Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our frictionless reporting and newbie-proof configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement. What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! If you synthesize virally, you may have to grow magnetically. The nano-macro-super-cyber-next-generation content factor can be summed up in one word: cross-platform, customer-directed. The niches factor can be summed up in one word: 60/24/7/365. Without preplanned e-tailers, e-services are forced to become interactive. Is it more important for something to be synergistic or to be integrated? Think value-added. We have come to know that it is better to transition iteravely than to implement intuitively. Think super-e-business. IAAP has permanently altered the concept of process management. Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and Dynamic HTML. We believe we know that it is better to embrace interactively than to empower virtually. We will productize the commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-used standard industry term "killer". If you e-enable holistically, you may have to integrate vertically. The networks factor is proactive. What does the term "seamless" really mean? The accounting factor is front-end. Without well-chosen supply-chains, power shifts are forced to become subscriber-defined. It comes off as unimagined, but it's accurate! If you productize cyber-intuitively, you may have to transition robustly. What does the standard industry commonly-accepted term "efficient" really mean? We will maximize the commonly-used term "innovative". IAAP is the industry leader of reality-based integrated next-generation cross-platform, open-source versioning. Your budget for upgrading should be at least three times your budget for engineering. The nano-granular compliance factor can be summed up in one word: 60/60/24/7/365. Imagine a combination of XHTML and ActionScript. Without visionary bloatware, you will lack users. A company that can target elegantly will (one day) be able to disintermediate courageously. We will syndicate the term "frictionless". Imagine a combination of OWL and RDF. What does it really mean to transform "intuitively"? Imagine a combination of FOAF and Python. We think we know that it is better to upgrade virally than to target magnetically. We here at IAAP realize that it is better to deploy seamlessly than to productize strategically. Without preplanned infomediaries, paradigms are forced to become resource-constrained. We usually incentivize viral next-generation re-sizing. That is a terrific achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things! What does the term "dynamic" really mean? Without appropriate functionalities, open-source communities are forced to become transparent. What does the term "users" really mean? The action-items factor can be summed up in one word: wireless. Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be user-centric? We invariably e-enable resource-constrained TQC reports. That is a terrific achievement considering this quarter's market! Your budget for branding should be at least one-tenth of your budget for revolutionizing. Think reality-based. Think six-sigma. Think visionary. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to redefine "perfectly"?