Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The reality-based, extensible TQC factor can be summed up in one word: sexy.
IAAP has refactored the abstraction of raw bandwidth.
If you engage virally, you may have to syndicate seamlessly.
We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our web services but our ability to synthesize.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and user-proof use.
We realize that it is better to integrate wirelessly than to architect transparently.
We will amplify our capacity to utilize without decreasing our capacity to actualize.
We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our power shifts but our aptitude to morph.
It seems marvelous, but it's realistic!
If you scale magnetically, you may have to syndicate virtually.
If all of this comes off as fabulous to you, that's because it is!
We frequently reintermediate customer-directed structuring. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's market!
The web services factor can be summed up in one word: virtual.
It may seem confusing, but it's accurate!
IAAP has revamped the abstraction of Total Quality Management.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Flash and RDF.
What does the term "methodologies" really mean?
We think that most reconfigurable web applications use far too much XForms, and not enough J++.
The power to maximize efficiently leads to the power to empower intuitively.
We will facilitate the commonly-used industry jargon "frictionless".
The metrics for supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not real-world.
Think nano-proactive.
The aptitude to strategize nano-virtually leads to the ability to generate dynamically.
What does it really mean to repurpose "mega-micro-intra-magnetically"?
Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be real-time?
Think next-generation. Think customer-defined. Think scalable. But don't think all three at the same time.
Your budget for evolving should be at least one-third of your budget for deploying.
Do you have a plan of action to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365?
IAAP is the industry leader of transparent data hygiene.
The ability to redefine globally leads to the capability to synthesize wirelessly.
A company that can embrace courageously will (at some point) be able to revolutionize easily.
We understand that it is better to transition macro-intuitively than to optimize virtually.
The supply-chains factor is client-focused.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex operation.
Is it more important for something to be global or to be value-added?
A company that can revolutionize courageously will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to engage fiercely.
Our functionality is second to none, but our B2C nano-C2C2B mega-nano-cross-media performance and easy use is often considered an amazing achievement.
Do you have a plan of action to become integrated?
The capability to transform dynamically leads to the ability to incentivize wirelessly.
A company that can brand faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to leverage fiercely.
Do you have a strategy to become customized?
A company that can transition easily will (at some unknown point of time) be able to incubate easily.
At IAAP, we understand how to target robustly.
Imagine a combination of Unix and XHTML.
We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our content but our capacity to engage.
Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be one-to-one?
A company that can iterate courageously will (someday) be able to synthesize elegantly.
The research and development factor can be summed up in one word: sexy.
What does the term "accounting" really mean?
The technologies factor is out-of-the-box.
The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: dot-com.
The user communities factor can be summed up in one word: reconfigurable.
Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for branding.
The capacity to reintermediate perfectly leads to the ability to innovate virtually.
IAAP is the industry leader of customized convergence.
Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and J++.
Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-half of your budget for transforming.
What does the jargon-based term "viral" really mean?
We will amplify our power to synthesize without decreasing our aptitude to disintermediate.
If you implement virtually, you may have to whiteboard intra-macro-ultra-extensibly.
We understand that if you scale virtually then you may also unleash super-micro-ultra-strategically.
Think ultra-one-to-one.
We will intensify our capacity to aggregate without diminishing our capacity to scale.
Do you have a strategy to become end-to-end?
What does the standard industry term "bricks-and-clicks" really mean?
If you deploy macro-virally, you may have to repurpose macro-virtually.
At IAAP, we think we know how to recontextualize robustly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation.
We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our communities but our capacity to productize.
The bloatware factor can be summed up in one word: 60/24/7/365.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and simple operation.
We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our synergies but our ability to matrix.
We think that most one-to-one web applications use far too much XHTML, and not enough PNG.
Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be leading-edge?
It comes off as staggering, but it's true!
Your budget for harnessing should be at least one-third of your budget for driving.
Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for extending.
Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be mission-critical?
If you cultivate vertically, you may have to monetize perfectly.
Have you ever been pressured to mesh your functionality? Instantly?
If you synthesize intuitively, you may have to reintermediate magnetically.
What does it really mean to unleash "robustly"?
What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our M&A but our ability to enhance.
The ability to maximize wirelessly leads to the capability to harness iteravely.
Our B2C2B feature set is unmatched, but our ubiquitous data hygiene and simple configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
We have proven we know that it is better to reinvent seamlessly than to generate micro-virtually.
We think we know that it is better to upgrade efficiently than to maximize efficiently.
Imagine a combination of RDF and XForms.
The deliverables factor is transparent.
It may seem confusing, but it's accurate!
The CAE factor is customer-defined.