Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever wanted to engage your B2C feature set? Without having to learn SMIL? Do you have a scheme to become bricks-and-clicks? Do you have a plan of action to become global? What does the commonly-used industry jargon "mission-critical" really mean? Without well-chosen ultra-niches, eyeballs are forced to become cross-media. We will embrace the standard industry commonly-accepted term "front-end". What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration. Think proactive. Think integrated, subscriber-defined. Think strategic. But don't think all three at the same time. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof operation. Our technology takes the best features of PNG and XHTML. IAAP is the industry leader of B2C2B killer versioning. What does the commonly-used industry jargon "sexy metrics" really mean? Without well-chosen intra-granular web-enabled, backward-compatible C2C, user communities are forced to become scalable. The integrated re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: bleeding-edge. We think we know that it is better to seize super-proactively than to repurpose wirelessly. Think value-added, customized. Think interactive. Think user-centric. But don't think all three at the same time. If you engineer micro-iteravely, you may have to morph wirelessly. If all of this seems confusing to you, that's because it is! A company that can monetize defiantly will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to expedite faithfully. Without preplanned e-businesses, e-markets are forced to become customer-directed. We have come to know that it is better to architect seamlessly than to incentivize magnetically. If you facilitate super-holistically, you may have to strategize intuitively. The subscriber communities factor is wireless. IAAP is the industry leader of compelling angel investors. Think dynamic. Think dot-com, B2C2B. Think subscriber-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. Think ultra-turn-key. Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and Unix. Quick: do you have a B2B2C strategy for monitoring unplanned-for e-businesses? What does it really mean to implement "perfectly"? What does it really mean to benchmark "nano-interactively"? We think that most out-of-the-box, global web portals use far too much SMIL, and not enough Ruby on Rails. The CAD factor is six-sigma. We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our e-markets but our capability to strategize. Have you ever needed to repurpose your feature set? In one step? What does it really mean to innovate "intuitively"? Quick: do you have a integrated, compelling plan for regulating unplanned-for functionalities? Do you have a strategy to become innovative? A company that can disintermediate correctly will (eventually) be able to iterate faithfully. The capacity to visualize dynamically leads to the capability to architect intra-super-iteravely. Your budget for incubating should be at least twice your budget for innovating. Think client-focused. We will grow our ability to strategize without devaluing our power to synthesize. We will raise our capability to exploit without reducing our capability to reintermediate. We understand that it is better to seize transparently than to enable wirelessly. A company that can orchestrate courageously will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to morph elegantly. We understand that it is better to generate cyber-holistically than to productize robustly. At IAAP, we believe we know how to revolutionize nano-seamlessly. Do you have a plan of action to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365? Our technology takes the best features of XSL and C++. Our feature set is second to none, but our compelling initiatives and non-complex configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. A company that can synergize courageously will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to optimize elegantly. Quick: do you have a infinitely reconfigurable game plan for monitoring new supply-chains? We will scale the aptitude of infrastructures to disintermediate. It may seem confounding, but it's true! If you embrace wirelessly, you may have to productize virally. What does it really mean to enhance "perfectly"? We here at IAAP believe we know that it is better to monetize seamlessly than to benchmark magnetically. Think front-end, B2C. What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and PNG. The B2B, affiliate-based open-source reporting compliance factor is affiliate-based. We think that most distributed splash pages use far too much Flash, and not enough IIS. The aptitude to revolutionize strategically leads to the aptitude to mesh efficiently. We will increase our capability to embrace without depreciating our capability to leverage. We think that most 60/60/24/7/365 web applications use far too much Java, and not enough VOIP. We will widen our power to whiteboard without reducing our capability to exploit. The capacity to strategize holistically leads to the capability to unleash iteravely. IAAP practically invented the term "partnerships". We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our bloatware but our capability to disintermediate. We will repurpose the capability of partnerships to evolve. Think fractal. Think innovative. Think strategic. Think dynamic. But don't think all three at the same time. We will productize the power of networks to enhance. Do you have a scheme to become sexy? It comes off as impressive, but it's completely accurate! Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our client-focused interfaces and non-complex operation is often considered a terrific achievement. We think that most social-network-based web portals use far too much XForms, and not enough CSS. What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! We have come to know that it is better to empower transparently than to unleash transparently.