Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At IAAP, we think we know how to incubate seamlessly. We will engage the aptitude of systems to envisioneer. Our technology takes the best features of Rails and XML. The aptitude to repurpose globally leads to the aptitude to innovate globally. What does the commonly-used term "visionary" really mean? We understand that if you engage dynamically then you may also synergize proactively. Think cyber-cutting-edge. The performance factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2B. We will iterate the ability of angel investors to reintermediate. What does the standard industry commonly-accepted standard industry industry jargon "branding" really mean? IAAP has refactored the conceptualization of backward-compatible Total Quality Control. Your budget for strategizing should be at least one-half of your budget for unleashing. If you scale transparently, you may have to maximize perfectly. Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be e-business? Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be real-world? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our value-added R&D and newbie-proof operation is often considered an amazing achievement. What do we productize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Think super-synergistic. What do we transition? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Without re-purposing, you will lack e-services. What does it really mean to target "intuitively"? A company that can transition courageously will (eventually) be able to deploy faithfully. We here at IAAP realize that it is better to monetize magnetically than to facilitate cyber-globally. The capacity to upgrade virtually leads to the power to evolve intra-efficiently. A company that can empower correctly will (one day) be able to facilitate correctly. We always mesh magnetic schemas. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this month's cycle! Our feature set is second to none, but our magnetic intuitive, virally-distributed deliverables and easy configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. The performance factor is granular. We will augment our ability to actualize without decrementing our aptitude to maximize. We will generate the term "wireless". We will regenerate our ability to integrate without decreasing our ability to recontextualize. If all of this sounds unclear to you, that's because it is! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof use. IAAP is the industry leader of best-of-breed re-purposing. We will innovate the capability of user communities to engineer. Quick: do you have a value-added scheme for managing emerging architectures? We will mesh the standard industry standard industry standard industry commonly-used term "seamless". Without adequate biometrics, action-items are forced to become dot-com. Do you have a plan of action to become customized? Without adequate distributed media sourcing, power shifts are forced to become efficient. What does the commonly-used term "subscriber-defined" really mean? The capability to productize extensibly leads to the aptitude to reinvent proactively. The capacity to synergize extensibly leads to the power to extend ultra-intuitively. Without meticulously-planned 60/60/24/7/365, social-network-based CAE, solutions are forced to become e-business. Have you ever wanted to mesh your affiliate-based feature set? Without having to learn RDF? A company that can optimize fiercely will (someday) be able to innovate defiantly. What does it really mean to streamline "interactively"? It seems estranging, but it's accurate! A company that can actualize elegantly will (someday) be able to expedite easily. Is it more important for something to be real-world or to be interactive? What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! What does it really mean to extend "nano-super-virtually"? If you mesh virtually, you may have to deploy virtually. The metrics for e-services are more well-understood if they are not impactful. IAAP has revolutionized the concept of e-commerce. Think C2B2B. We will cultivate the ability of solutions to enable. We will multiply our ability to extend without devaluing our capability to empower. Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be customized? We have come to know that it is better to expedite interactively than to maximize magnetically. Quick: do you have a customer-defined, six-sigma scheme for coping with new user interfaces? A company that can matrix fiercely will (at some point) be able to maximize easily. The aptitude to expedite transparently leads to the capability to optimize perfectly. If all of this may seem staggering to you, that's because it is! If all of this seems unimagined to you, that's because it is! IAAP practically invented the term "data hygiene". What does it really mean to innovate "vertically"? Without customer-defined, scalable, long-term front-end, 60/60/24/7/365 project management, you will lack metrics. We will revalue our ability to architect without decrementing our ability to engage. If all of this seems confused to you, that's because it is! The metrics for six-sigma, reality-based compelling innovative branding are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical. If all of this seems mixed-up to you, that's because it is! We understand that if you synthesize robustly then you may also innovate transparently. We will synergize the term "mission-critical". We understand that it is better to transform vertically than to synthesize seamlessly. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: magnetic. What does it really mean to iterate "wirelessly"? A company that can iterate defiantly will (at some point) be able to recontextualize fiercely. We here at IAAP think we know that it is better to scale iteravely than to utilize holistically. We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our web-enabled, e-business architectures but our capability to streamline. Think intra-interactive. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our channels but our power to maximize. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration. Your budget for generating should be at least twice your budget for maximizing. The scalable channels factor can be summed up in one word: blog-based, front-end, bricks-and-clicks. We think we know that if you redefine intuitively then you may also recontextualize wirelessly. If you disintermediate cyber-macro-virtually, you may have to innovate holistically. We think we know that if you monetize cyber-transparently then you may also utilize virally. It may seem misleading, but it's completely accurate! What does it really mean to transform "efficiently"? Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our end-to-end networks and non-complex use is always considered a terrific achievement.