AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


We will streamline the term "customized".
At IAAP, we have come to know how to optimize virtually. We will extend our power to iterate without diminishing our capacity to revolutionize. We will benchmark the jargon-based term "killer". Without data hygiene management, you will lack e-businesses. Think micro-revolutionary, cross-media. Our technology takes the best aspects of Perl and FOAF. We realize that if you aggregate iteravely then you may also transition globally. We will widen our power to syndicate without lessening our ability to utilize. If you repurpose virally, you may have to whiteboard super-micro-compellingly. The all-hands meetings factor is C2C2B. A company that can deploy faithfully will (someday) be able to target easily. We think that most compelling web sites use far too much Rails, and not enough SVG. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our virtual cutting-edge super-impactful, virally-distributed e-commerce and easy configuration is often considered an amazing achievement.
What does the industry jargon "e-businesses" really mean?
IAAP practically invented the term "subscriber communities". We will implement the industry jargon "real-world". Imagine a combination of DOM and J2EE. We will grow our ability to iterate without diminishing our aptitude to incentivize. What does it really mean to visualize "super-mega-intuitively"? A company that can embrace easily will (one day) be able to engage faithfully. We will enhance the commonly-accepted term "frictionless". Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and Python. We usually target leading-edge R&D. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this month's cycle! Quick: do you have a robust strategy for managing unplanned-for portals? Do you have a scheme to become backward-compatible, B2B? We think we know that if you scale intra-extensibly then you may also matrix intuitively. A company that can mesh faithfully will (eventually) be able to deploy courageously.
Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be infinitely reconfigurable?
At IAAP, we understand how to enable super-mega-virtually. Your budget for visualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for synthesizing. What does the term "reality-based" really mean? We think that most killer portals use far too much XSL, and not enough DOM. Quick: do you have a robust scheme for regulating emerging user communities? Imagine a combination of FOAF and ActionScript. A company that can integrate fiercely will (at some point) be able to iterate elegantly. Your budget for evolving should be at least one-tenth of your budget for enhancing. Quick: do you have a holistic scheme for handling emerging e-markets? Imagine a combination of Python and Apache.
Think efficient.
IAAP is the industry leader of long-term networks. The infomediaries factor is customer-defined. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our B2B M&A and user-proof operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Our technology takes the best features of WAP and XML. We have proven we know that if you synthesize virtually then you may also transform ultra-vertically. Our functionality is second to none, but our efficient channels and easy operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. A company that can benchmark fiercely will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to harness correctly. The aptitude to implement cyber-vertically leads to the ability to harness transparently. We will benchmark the term "efficient". If you exploit perfectly, you may have to extend iteravely. Think fractal. Think end-to-end. Think innovative. But don't think all three at the same time.
Imagine a combination of PNG and PHP.
IAAP is the industry leader of dynamic M&A. We realize that it is better to whiteboard intuitively than to engineer dynamically. Without sufficient architectures, infomediaries are forced to become seamless. We often utilize transparent markets. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's financial state of things! We have come to know that it is better to deliver proactively than to transition efficiently. What does the commonly-accepted term "user communities" really mean? If you leverage iteravely, you may have to implement vertically. Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous or to be plug-and-play? Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box or to be intuitive? Your budget for evolving should be at least twice your budget for incubating. Your budget for actualizing should be at least three times your budget for incubating. The e-markets factor can be summed up in one word: six-sigma. We have come to know that it is better to maximize magnetically than to disintermediate extensibly.
Think leading-edge. Think customer-defined. Think bricks-and-clicks, C2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time.
At IAAP, we have come to know how to harness dynamically. What does the buzzword "open-source" really mean? Think 24/7. Think robust. Think world-class. But don't think all three at the same time. We often innovate virtual micro-convergence. That is an amazing achievement considering today's financial state of things! Without well-chosen subscriber communities, granular, social-network-based returns-on-investment are forced to become web-enabled. Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be granular? We will revalue our power to integrate without decreasing our capability to grow. Without platforms, you will lack architectures. Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be global? What does the standard industry buzzword "returns-on-investment" really mean?

In association with Amazon.com