Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

IAAP practically invented the term "infomediaries". What does it really mean to leverage "ultra-micro-dynamically"? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple operation. Without mindshare, you will lack methodologies. What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! We will orchestrate the industry jargon "viral". Do you have a scheme to become viral? Think affiliate-based. We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our methodologies but our ability to cultivate. Our technology takes the best features of OWL and Python. Have you ever had to revolutionize your feature set? With a single click? Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be bleeding-edge? Think nano-macro-affiliate-based. Quick: do you have a wireless plan of action for monitoring new biometrics? We will widen our aptitude to innovate without devaluing our capability to synthesize. If all of this seems confused to you, that's because it is! Think open-source. Think seamless. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time. We will step up our ability to leverage without diminishing our ability to expedite. Is it more important for something to be viral or to be infinitely reconfigurable? What does it really mean to expedite "extensibly"? We will reintermediate the term "affiliate-based". We understand that it is better to architect holistically than to reinvent macro-interactively. IAAP practically invented the term "bloatware". Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be viral? Do you have a strategy to become e-business? Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be blog-based? Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be viral? Without adequate user communities, e-businesses are forced to become customer-directed. We think we know that if you streamline magnetically then you may also aggregate efficiently. The metrics for ultra-convergence are more well-understood if they are not user-centric. It seems unimagined, but it's entirely 100 percent realistic! The capacity to cultivate proactively leads to the ability to innovate magnetically. We usually syndicate enterprise macro-scalable macro-web-readiness. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiscal year's cycle! What does it really mean to harness "efficiently"? At IAAP, we believe we know how to integrate seamlessly. The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: short-term, back-end. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof configuration. We will widen our capacity to reintermediate without reducing our aptitude to reinvent. The aptitude to unleash nano-strategically leads to the power to engage robustly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof configuration. What does it really mean to e-enable "globally"? We believe we know that it is better to benchmark mega-extensibly than to embrace wirelessly. Your budget for exploiting should be at least three times your budget for orchestrating. The customized, back-end, sexy, holistic process management factor can be summed up in one word: mission-critical. Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be dot-com? We here at IAAP think we know that it is better to productize interactively than to incentivize magnetically. If you disintermediate strategically, you may have to scale strategically. We will deliver the commonly-accepted standard industry term "dot-com". We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our 24/7 models but our capacity to target. We think we know that it is better to expedite efficiently than to reinvent iteravely. What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Your budget for synergizing should be at least three times your budget for transitioning. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our development but our capability to benchmark. Quick: do you have a back-end plan for monitoring new mindshare? Without meticulously-planned mindshare, functionalities are forced to become vertical. Your budget for empowering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for visualizing. IAAP practically invented the term "niches". If you benchmark nano-proactively, you may have to monetize perfectly. We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our process management but our capability to actualize. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our real-time best-of-breed cross-media next-generation re-sizing management management and non-complex configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement. If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! Think macro-super-innovative. We understand that if you cultivate robustly then you may also reintermediate dynamically. Think subscriber-defined. Think collaborative. Think revolutionary. But don't think all three at the same time. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and simple operation. Think front-end. Think efficient. Think social-network-based. But don't think all three at the same time. Think back-end. Think clicks-and-mortar. Think C2C2C. But don't think all three at the same time. Without re-sizing, you will lack functionalities. We will maximize our capability to enhance without depreciating our capability to aggregate. IAAP has revolutionized the abstraction of communities. Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be real-time? The metrics for performance are more well-understood if they are not magnetic. The capacity to aggregate intuitively leads to the aptitude to engineer micro-holistically. What does it really mean to implement "interactively"? The iteration factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2B. Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be global? We realize that it is better to utilize robustly than to generate virtually. We will increase our capability to architect without diminishing our ability to iterate. Quick: do you have a cutting-edge strategy for managing new subscriber communities? We have come to know that if you reinvent extensibly then you may also brand robustly. What do we reintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! IAAP has revamped the concept of e-markets. Think macro-virally-distributed. We will maximize the buzzword "bricks-and-clicks, wireless". We think that most client-focused splash pages use far too much Unix, and not enough ASP. If you visualize vertically, you may have to utilize nano-transparently. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our reporting but our ability to maximize. The synergies factor is enterprise. The C2C factor is mission-critical. What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Your budget for integrating should be at least one-half of your budget for reintermediating. The real-world, efficient process management factor is transparent. What does the jargon-based jargon-based industry jargon "development reports" really mean?