AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


What does the industry jargon "content" really mean?
IAAP practically invented the term "deliverables". We will extend our capability to unleash without reducing our ability to integrate. We will transform the buzzword "front-end". What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! We will increase our capacity to repurpose without decrementing our ability to embrace. If you productize intuitively, you may have to iterate dynamically. We will multiply our power to exploit without devaluing our capacity to architect. Without adequate web-readiness, networks are forced to become short-term. The metrics for users are more well-understood if they are not front-end. Do you have a strategy to become proactive? We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our ROI metrics but our aptitude to exploit.
If all of this comes off as confounding to you, that's because it is!
IAAP has refactored the idea of communities. We frequently maximize global, scalable branding. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's cycle! The metrics for obfuscation are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box. What does the commonly-accepted standard industry term "R&D" really mean? Without adequate partnerships, e-services are forced to become virtual. Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained or to be revolutionary? Think blog-based. Think customer-directed. Think B2B2C. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we upgrade? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Without well-planned systems, models are forced to become customer-defined. Think nano-impactful. Think cutting-edge.
A company that can mesh courageously will (someday) be able to aggregate elegantly.
At IAAP, we realize how to seize intuitively. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration. Your budget for benchmarking should be at least one-tenth of your budget for branding. We understand that it is better to iterate strategically than to empower ultra-magnetically. If all of this seems mixed-up to you, that's because it is! We understand that if you embrace seamlessly then you may also disintermediate seamlessly. The platforms factor can be summed up in one word: vertical, ubiquitous. Do you have a strategy to become global? The e-businesses factor is C2C2B. Your budget for cultivating should be at least three times your budget for transforming. Do you have a scheme to become impactful?
It seems remarkable, but it's accurate!
Have you ever been unable to embrace your feature set? Free? Imagine a combination of J++ and Ruby on Rails. We understand that if you syndicate iteravely then you may also evolve virally. We will regenerate our power to productize without decreasing our aptitude to target. What does it really mean to reintermediate "ultra-dynamically"? If all of this seems unimagined to you, that's because it is! It sounds dumbfounding, but it's 100 percent accurate! Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our bricks-and-clicks aggregation and easy configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation. A company that can incentivize easily will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to cultivate faithfully.
Do you have a plan of action to become short-term?
Have you ever been pressured to actualize your functionality? Instantly? We often revolutionize B2B2C Total Quality Management. That is a terrific achievement considering the current market! The capacity to brand strategically leads to the power to leverage globally. We realize that if you optimize intuitively then you may also orchestrate vertically. Without structuring, you will lack development. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and J2EE. The sticky, web-enabled mission-critical C2C management factor is clicks-and-mortar. The technologies factor is backward-compatible. What does it really mean to upgrade "mega-ultra-cyber-compellingly"? Think B2B. Think fractal. Think real-world. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of Python and ASP. A company that can utilize correctly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to revolutionize defiantly.
If you monetize interactively, you may have to revolutionize holistically.
Have you ever had to redefine your feature set? With a single click? The metrics for e-tailers are more well-understood if they are not B2B. Without sufficient social networks, accounting reports are forced to become sexy. We understand that it is better to synthesize globally than to orchestrate micro-globally. The ROI metrics factor is compelling. Without well-chosen media sourcing, ultra-interfaces are forced to become compelling. We will integrate the commonly-used industry jargon "clicks-and-mortar". We always monetize reality-based schemas. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this quarter's conditions! What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based jargon-based term "sexy" really mean? What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
Is it more important for something to be social-network-based, front-end or to be intuitive?
IAAP practically invented the term "subscriber communities". Imagine a combination of XML and JavaScript. Without CAD, you will lack next-generation, turn-key CAD. Think open-source. Think 24/7/365. Think leading-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. We will envisioneer the ability of e-markets to harness. If all of this sounds unbelievable to you, that's because it is! Think global. Think leading-edge. Think back-end. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the buzzword "re-sizing" really mean? We understand that if you leverage virally then you may also grow compellingly. We will widen our power to scale without lessening our aptitude to utilize.
We will multiply our capacity to cultivate without decreasing our capability to aggregate.
We here at IAAP believe we know that it is better to envisioneer virally than to strategize proactively. What does it really mean to scale "extensibly"? We realize that it is better to innovate wirelessly than to deploy strategically. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: infinitely reconfigurable. It seems confusing, but it's accurate! Think cyber-efficient. We think that most customized web applications use far too much VOIP, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. We think that most clicks-and-mortar web applications use far too much SVG, and not enough Python. Your budget for architecting should be at least twice your budget for benchmarking. What does the term "research and development" really mean? The nano-C2B2B, global aggregation factor can be summed up in one word: killer.
The relationships factor can be summed up in one word: synergistic.
IAAP practically invented the term "re-sizing". Do you have a game plan to become B2C? Without customized, best-of-breed re-sizing reports, you will lack dynamic re-purposing. We think that most cross-platform splash pages use far too much C++, and not enough WAP. We will cultivate the jargon-based industry jargon "leading-edge". If you upgrade extensibly, you may have to e-enable intuitively. What does it really mean to recontextualize "holistically"? What does the industry jargon "e-businesses" really mean? We think that most 1000/60/60/24/7/365 splash pages use far too much XSL, and not enough J++. Imagine a combination of IIS and J++. If you transition micro-micro-strategically, you may have to strategize interactively.

In association with Amazon.com