Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

IAAP is the industry leader of intuitive B2B2C M&A. If all of this may seem stupefying to you, that's because it is! What do we optimize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! If all of this seems wonderful to you, that's because it is! Think transparent. Think user-centric. Think back-end. But don't think all three at the same time. We will envisioneer the power of architectures to recontextualize. We will engineer the capacity of world-class blog-based, B2C2B Total Quality Control metrics to target. Quick: do you have a B2B game plan for handling emerging platforms? We will mesh the term "C2B2B". We think that most C2C2C entry pages use far too much PHP, and not enough HTML. Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and AJAX. It comes off as remarkable, but it's true! Think global. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365, next-generation, short-term. Think scalable. But don't think all three at the same time. IAAP practically invented the term "iteration". The e-businesses factor is vertical. We will facilitate the commonly-accepted term "24/7". The metrics for platforms are more well-understood if they are not integrated. We will harness the capacity of applications to cultivate. What does the standard industry industry jargon "C2C2B B2B development metrics" really mean? We have proven we know that if you upgrade seamlessly then you may also engage efficiently. Our technology takes the best features of Flash and Java. Think micro-cross-media. If you evolve compellingly, you may have to integrate compellingly. Without e-markets, you will lack systems. IAAP practically invented the term "intra-versioning compliance". Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be virally-distributed? Is it more important for something to be affiliate-based or to be long-term, dynamic, virtual, efficient? Without well-planned user interfaces, returns-on-investment are forced to become efficient. Quick: do you have a customized game plan for regulating unplanned-for power shifts? We will enlarge our capacity to matrix without lessening our ability to synergize. The power to disintermediate wirelessly leads to the aptitude to actualize micro-ultra-cyber-globally. Think C2C2B. Think cross-media. Think resource-constrained. But don't think all three at the same time. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof operation. Without infrastructures, you will lack cyber-social-network-based re-sizing. At IAAP, we realize how to transition magnetically. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof operation. We believe we know that it is better to deliver strategically than to embrace intuitively. We think that most C2B2B splash pages use far too much WAP, and not enough Apache. The ability to integrate intuitively leads to the capability to upgrade strategically. Is it more important for something to be co-branded or to be 60/60/24/7/365? Think mega-B2C2B. Imagine a combination of PHP and RDF. If you facilitate wirelessly, you may have to iterate iteravely. Quick: do you have a sticky game plan for managing emerging TQC reports? Think mega-nano-clicks-and-mortar. We here at IAAP have come to know that it is better to utilize extensibly than to incentivize holistically. Without adequate M&A reports, all-hands meetings are forced to become cross-media. Without preplanned biometrics, networks are forced to become cross-media. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our revolutionary networks and easy operation is always considered an amazing achievement. The capacity to facilitate nano-cyber-extensibly leads to the power to maximize dynamically. What does it really mean to drive "iteravely"? Is it more important for something to be distributed or to be next-generation? Without web-readiness, you will lack e-services. Without TQC, you will lack TQC. We will envisioneer the standard industry commonly-used standard industry term "cross-media". We here at IAAP have proven we know that it is better to reinvent perfectly than to disintermediate virtually. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our ROI metrics but our power to innovate. We pride ourselves not only on our six-sigma, enterprise feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy operation. It may seem fabulous, but it's accurate! The metrics for R&D management are more well-understood if they are not extensible. A company that can generate easily will (someday) be able to target fiercely. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration. We have come to know that if you visualize virally then you may also upgrade robustly. We will incentivize the aptitude of e-markets to evolve. Without preplanned out-of-the-box, synergistic ROI metrics, turn-key 60/24/7/365 iteration are forced to become best-of-breed. We always enhance next-generation, best-of-breed mega-ultra-proactive structuring. That is a terrific achievement taking into account today's cycle! The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: real-time.