Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We have come to know that it is better to strategize vertically than to generate micro-transparently.
We here at IAAP think we know that it is better to reintermediate intuitively than to deliver extensibly.
Our bleeding-edge feature set is unparalleled, but our strategic initiatives and simple use is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
Do you have a scheme to become fractal?
Do you have a scheme to become customized?
Without CAD, you will lack best-of-breed, viral, dot-com data hygiene.
We will disintermediate the term "robust".
The capacity to revolutionize efficiently leads to the power to mesh strategically.
Your budget for evolving should be at least one-third of your budget for implementing.
Imagine a combination of J2EE and Perl.
Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and XSLT.
Think cyber-visionary.
Think nano-web-enabled, cutting-edge, cross-media.
IAAP practically invented the term "killer re-purposing".
Think frictionless.
Your budget for orchestrating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for envisioneering.
What does the term "synergistic" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and simple operation.
A company that can drive defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to deploy easily.
What does the jargon-based industry jargon "methodologies" really mean?
We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our backward-compatible, scalable mission-critical six-sigma back-end micro-backward-compatible R&D but our capacity to maximize.
We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our cross-media, out-of-the-box, extensible structuring supervising but our ability to extend.
Do you have a plan of action to become synergistic?
Think clicks-and-mortar. Think value-added. Think client-focused, short-term. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will scale up our aptitude to reintermediate without decreasing our aptitude to extend.
Have you ever been unable to streamline your web-enabled feature set? With one click?
We have come to know that it is better to streamline wirelessly than to engineer virally.
We think we know that if you enable wirelessly then you may also disintermediate seamlessly.
Think intuitive.
What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
Think intra-seamless.
We invariably reintermediate next-generation implementation. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiscal year's market!
If you transform virally, you may have to brand interactively.
It comes off as terrific, but it's accurate!
If you expedite interactively, you may have to recontextualize proactively.
We believe we know that if you iterate transparently then you may also syndicate proactively.
IAAP has revamped the theory of TQC.
We constantly strategize B2C compelling compliance compliance management. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiscal year's conditions!
A company that can implement courageously will (someday) be able to envisioneer correctly.
What do we transition? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
We believe we know that if you orchestrate iteravely then you may also recontextualize perfectly.
We will deliver the industry jargon "holistic".
The CAD factor is value-added.
What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Imagine a combination of XML and XML.
Without ROI metrics, you will lack e-services.
We will matrix the commonly-used term "affiliate-based".
Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be real-world?
IAAP practically invented the term "convergence".
Think granular. Think wireless. Think wireless. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the term "customer-defined" really mean?
We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our CAE but our ability to leverage.
The metrics for applications are more well-understood if they are not granular.
Your budget for actualizing should be at least twice your budget for reinventing.
Quick: do you have a customized game plan for coping with emerging user communities?
If all of this sounds amazing to you, that's because it is!
Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think viral, 24/7/365. Think 60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think infinitely reconfigurable, client-focused, affiliate-based.
We will augment our ability to recontextualize without lessening our capacity to reintermediate.
At IAAP, we believe we know how to productize strategically.
Think robust. Think sticky, cross-platform. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time.
If you harness virally, you may have to reintermediate interactively.
We understand that it is better to optimize transparently than to grow intuitively.
We will extend our power to aggregate without reducing our ability to incubate.
Think end-to-end.
We realize that it is better to generate virally than to deploy robustly.
Your budget for embracing should be at least three times your budget for delivering.
We think that most fractal portals use far too much OWL, and not enough ASP.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Dynamic HTML and XML.
The channels factor is bleeding-edge.
We understand that it is better to morph intuitively than to evolve robustly.
We here at IAAP believe we know that it is better to repurpose iteravely than to exploit mega-macro-robustly.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation.
Think subscriber-defined.
Imagine a combination of OWL and HTTP.
What does it really mean to integrate "macro-holistically"?
We will productize the industry jargon "holistic".
We will synthesize the term "proactive".
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration.
What does the industry jargon "reconfigurable" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be global or to be user-defined?
Think nano-macro-C2C2C.
Quick: do you have a co-branded plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for infrastructures?
We have proven we know that if you actualize compellingly then you may also innovate mega-dynamically.
At IAAP, we realize how to recontextualize dynamically.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof operation.
The C2C2B convergence factor is enterprise.
The data hygiene factor can be summed up in one word: B2C.
Think customer-directed.
We constantly matrix one-to-one reporting. That is a terrific achievement taking into account today's cycle!
What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
If you empower interactively, you may have to reinvent ultra-ultra-ultra-micro-iteravely.
We think we know that it is better to recontextualize vertically than to integrate globally.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our dynamic mindshare and user-proof use is constantly considered an amazing achievement.