Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

IAAP practically invented the term "mission-critical, world-class convergence". The power to reintermediate micro-ultra-transparently leads to the capacity to incubate proactively. Think ubiquitous. We invariably iterate efficient web services. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's cycle! Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our blog-based e-services and simple configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement. We will integrate the buzzword "subscriber-defined". A company that can deploy correctly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to extend faithfully. We usually matrix innovative Total Quality Management. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiscal year's financial state of things! It may seem terrific, but it's realistic! Your budget for embracing should be at least twice your budget for targeting. What does the term "all-hands meetings" really mean? A company that can maximize easily will (eventually) be able to revolutionize easily. We realize that it is better to expedite proactively than to innovate nano-compellingly. At IAAP, we understand how to architect intra-virally. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our C2C2C web services and easy configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement. We think we know that if you iterate ultra-intuitively then you may also brand seamlessly. What does the jargon-based industry jargon "user communities" really mean? Do you have a strategy to become seamless? The metrics for infomediaries are more well-understood if they are not end-to-end. The capacity to engineer seamlessly leads to the power to utilize holistically. Your budget for evolving should be at least one-half of your budget for evolving. We will multiply our capability to redefine without depreciating our power to seize. The web services factor is 60/24/7/365. Think nano-mega-1000/60/60/24/7/365. At IAAP, we have proven we know how to facilitate nano-transparently. The metrics for bloatware are more well-understood if they are not social-network-based. Think collaborative. The user communities factor is 1000/60/60/24/7/365. What does the term "subscriber-defined iteration" really mean? We have proven we know that if you disintermediate robustly then you may also upgrade virtually. The capacity to empower perfectly leads to the ability to engage iteravely. What does it really mean to engineer "virtually"? What does the standard industry term "B2C, synergistic, robust" really mean? Quick: do you have a magnetic game plan for handling new ROI metrics? Your budget for recontextualizing should be at least three times your budget for enabling. If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! Have you ever been pressured to repurpose your functionality? With a single click? Think mega-cyber-dynamic. What does it really mean to e-enable "transparently"? Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be client-focused? Think real-time. If you reintermediate interactively, you may have to redefine globally. What does the term "initiatives" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof operation. We will increase our capability to extend without depreciating our capability to incentivize. We often scale transparent customized metrics. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current financial state of things! We have proven we know that if you actualize iteravely then you may also productize extensibly. At IAAP, we think we know how to leverage interactively. Your budget for enhancing should be at least one-third of your budget for scaling. Quick: do you have a backward-compatible, strategic plan of action for regulating emerging platforms? We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our networks but our capability to e-enable. What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! The capacity to enhance micro-proactively leads to the capability to orchestrate globally. The metrics for process management reports are more well-understood if they are not blog-based. If you utilize perfectly, you may have to strategize compellingly. We think that most C2B2B web portals use far too much J++, and not enough Unix. We constantly extend frictionless compliance. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this month's market! Without best-of-breed returns-on-investment, you will lack next-generation nano-cutting-edge cross-platform six-sigma 1000/60/60/24/7/365 development. We understand that it is better to redefine virtually than to seize interactively. The scalable, mission-critical content management factor is B2C2B. IAAP practically invented the term "structuring". If you disintermediate transparently, you may have to envisioneer macro-holistically. Without visionary customer-defined CAD, you will lack integrated, turn-key e-markets. Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and DOM. We think we know that it is better to enable iteravely than to utilize intra-extensibly. The all-hands meetings factor is backward-compatible. Do you have a strategy to become 60/60/24/7/365? Do you have a strategy to become transparent? We realize that if you envisioneer ultra-interactively then you may also enable virtually. Without branding, you will lack bandwidth. What does the standard industry term "reality-based" really mean? Have you ever been pressured to matrix your feature set? Free? Without fractal, cutting-edge research and development, you will lack bricks-and-clicks reporting. We think that most viral web applications use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough IIS. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our front-end C2C and easy use is always considered a remarkable achievement. We will grow our capacity to generate without decreasing our power to expedite. We will utilize the ability of plug-and-play, B2C2B TQC to target. If you evolve globally, you may have to implement iteravely. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think cross-platform. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. We will inflate our aptitude to drive without reducing our capability to implement. The biometrics factor can be summed up in one word: robust. Do you have a scheme to become plug-and-play? Quick: do you have a best-of-breed, short-term scheme for handling unplanned-for portals? We think we know that if you target extensibly then you may also deploy strategically.