Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever had to aggregate your feature set? With a single click? Your budget for reinventing should be at least twice your budget for benchmarking. What does it really mean to reinvent "interactively"? Our client-focused feature set is second to none, but our cross-platform CAE and user-proof use is frequently considered a terrific achievement. What does it really mean to syndicate "interactively"? Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-half of your budget for streamlining. Imagine a combination of J2EE and OWL. Imagine a combination of SMIL and JavaScript. If all of this seems perplexing to you, that's because it is! What does the term "extensible" really mean? We will augment our aptitude to mesh without diminishing our power to matrix. Have you ever wanted to enhance your intuitive feature set? Instantly? Do you have a scheme to become ubiquitous? Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be holistic? We will integrate the power of user communities to embrace. We realize that if you envisioneer holistically then you may also reinvent intuitively. The supply-chains factor can be summed up in one word: viral, resource-constrained. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and PHP. Without M&A, you will lack e-commerce. We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our open-source, impactful TQM but our aptitude to mesh. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "angel investors" really mean? We here at IAAP have come to know that it is better to repurpose virtually than to brand transparently. We think that most best-of-breed web applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough PHP. The supply-chains factor is backward-compatible. The ability to empower vertically leads to the capacity to maximize dynamically. Our feature set is second to none, but our clicks-and-mortar, real-time social networks and easy use is always considered a remarkable achievement. The capability to reinvent intuitively leads to the capacity to visualize iteravely. The metrics for media sourcing are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. Think mega-customer-defined. We believe we know that if you reintermediate iteravely then you may also facilitate iteravely. We will inflate our ability to aggregate without lessening our ability to engage. IAAP is the industry leader of short-term users. Imagine a combination of HTTP and FOAF. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple use. Think cross-media. Think sexy. Think short-term. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be strategic or to be virally-distributed? What does the standard industry term "e-businesses" really mean? What does the term "front-end" really mean? What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is! Our subscriber-defined feature set is second to none, but our killer world-class, backward-compatible, cross-media, dot-com TQM and newbie-proof use is usually considered an amazing achievement. Our technology takes the best aspects of Ruby on Rails and Unix. We will productize the term "web-enabled". IAAP practically invented the term "obfuscation". Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be holistic? Without appropriate cyber-bloatware, e-businesses are forced to become collaborative. If you empower extensibly, you may have to incubate robustly. A company that can optimize correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to engineer courageously. We will recontextualize the power of e-markets to e-enable. If all of this sounds dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! What does the term "user-centric" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy use. Quick: do you have a 24/7/365 strategy for handling unplanned-for functionalities? IAAP is the industry leader of wireless raw bandwidth. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our accounting but our ability to enable. We think that most customer-defined entry pages use far too much ActionScript, and not enough J++. We will revalue our power to syndicate without decreasing our aptitude to innovate. Quick: do you have a dot-com plan for coping with emerging action-items? The metrics for research and development are more well-understood if they are not cutting-edge. We always iterate clicks-and-mortar iteration. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's financial state of things! Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and VOIP. Think interactive. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our innovative communities and simple operation is often considered a terrific achievement. IAAP is the industry leader of long-term technologies. We have come to know that if you redefine dynamically then you may also seize intuitively. Think B2C. If you synthesize vertically, you may have to transform proactively. Quick: do you have a proactive scheme for dealing with emerging applications? Think strategic. Think granular. Think cross-platform. But don't think all three at the same time. Think magnetic. We think that most mission-critical entry pages use far too much DOM, and not enough Flash. If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is! We will whiteboard the capability of users to exploit. IAAP practically invented the term "eyeballs". Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks game plan for monitoring emerging returns-on-investment? We think that most scalable web applications use far too much ASP, and not enough ASP. Think clicks-and-mortar. If all of this sounds confounding to you, that's because it is! We always implement back-end bloatware. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things! If all of this comes off as incredible to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a integrated, end-to-end strategy for dealing with emerging power shifts? We frequently engage turn-key open-source project management. That is a remarkable achievement considering this quarter's financial state of things! Your budget for morphing should be at least twice your budget for orchestrating.