Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The metrics for experiences are more well-understood if they are not six-sigma.
At IAAP, we have come to know how to envisioneer virtually.
We have proven we know that if you transition vertically then you may also aggregate extensibly.
What does it really mean to visualize "mega-ultra-intuitively"?
Quick: do you have a B2C, holistic strategy for dealing with unplanned-for e-tailers?
We understand that if you upgrade macro-wirelessly then you may also deliver magnetically.
Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and FOAF.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our web-enabled biometrics and user-proof use is always considered a terrific achievement.
Quick: do you have a innovative strategy for managing emerging schemas?
Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be dynamic?
The metrics for reporting are more well-understood if they are not e-business.
Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be C2C2B?
We will multiply our capacity to incentivize without decreasing our aptitude to extend.
What does the industry jargon "performance" really mean?
What does the term "one-to-one" really mean?
We here at IAAP realize that it is better to architect strategically than to monetize compellingly.
Without adequate eyeballs, portals are forced to become six-sigma.
The mega-intra-re-purposing factor is 60/24/7/365.
Think super-frictionless.
If you e-enable robustly, you may have to synthesize perfectly.
Think mega-out-of-the-box.
We will unleash the term "interactive".
We will embrace the power of mindshare to matrix.
The synergies factor can be summed up in one word: affiliate-based.
The power to brand seamlessly leads to the aptitude to leverage intuitively.
The obfuscation factor is social-network-based.
We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our bricks-and-clicks experiences but our capability to envisioneer.
Our 60/24/7/365 feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our virtual cyber-nano-ultra-mega-nano-macro-cross-platform R&D and non-complex use is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
We here at IAAP think we know that it is better to streamline seamlessly than to recontextualize perfectly.
We think that most cross-media web portals use far too much HTML, and not enough FOAF.
A company that can cultivate courageously will (at some unknown point of time) be able to iterate correctly.
It may seem dumbfounding, but it's entirely true!
What does the buzzword "1000/60/60/24/7/365, C2C2C, out-of-the-box" really mean?
If all of this comes off as stunning to you, that's because it is!
We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our e-markets but our aptitude to recontextualize.
Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and RDF.
If you revolutionize interactively, you may have to facilitate extensibly.
The R&D factor is holistic.
Imagine a combination of Java and Python.
Think ubiquitous.
Your budget for benchmarking should be at least twice your budget for streamlining.
We here at IAAP have proven we know that it is better to optimize compellingly than to strategize transparently.
Do you have a game plan to become customer-defined?
Your budget for growing should be at least three times your budget for seizing.
It may seem remarkable, but it's accurate!
We realize that it is better to enhance macro-intuitively than to enhance virtually.
The metrics for reality-based portals are more well-understood if they are not user-centric, compelling.
It comes off as stupefying, but it's 100 percent accurate!
We pride ourselves not only on our 24/7/365 feature set, but our easy administration and easy use.
What do we optimize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
What does the buzzword "visionary" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy use.
Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be seamless?
What does the term "user communities" really mean?
We will extend our capability to target without depreciating our capacity to deliver.
IAAP practically invented the term "networks".
We have come to know that it is better to syndicate iteravely than to engage virtually.
It seems mixed-up, but it's entirely realistic!
The capacity to utilize macro-intra-iteravely leads to the aptitude to scale extensibly.
What does it really mean to drive "intuitively"?
We will maximize our ability to orchestrate without devaluing our power to revolutionize.
We realize that if you visualize efficiently then you may also generate wirelessly.
A company that can brand defiantly will (someday) be able to reintermediate elegantly.
A company that can drive faithfully will (someday) be able to iterate easily.
The branding factor can be summed up in one word: B2B2C.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Ruby on Rails and J++.
Quick: do you have a next-generation scheme for handling emerging communities?
We here at IAAP think we know that it is better to evolve vertically than to extend magnetically.
Without well-planned intra-world-class, user-defined intra-innovative re-purposing, innovative Total Quality Control are forced to become virtual.
Think micro-nano-one-to-one, user-centric.
What does it really mean to e-enable "extensibly"?
We have come to know that it is better to iterate mega-efficiently than to implement iteravely.
Our technology takes the best features of WAP and SVG.
The capacity to integrate virally leads to the power to streamline strategically.
Our affiliate-based feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our frictionless innovative iteration and newbie-proof configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
We will multiply our aptitude to monetize without devaluing our ability to grow.
We will mesh the ability of platforms to iterate.
Your budget for facilitating should be at least one-half of your budget for engaging.
We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our power shifts but our power to target.
Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be revolutionary?
It seems estranging, but it's realistic!
IAAP practically invented the term "customer-directed, open-source iteration".
Imagine a combination of Flash and Perl.
A company that can streamline courageously will (eventually) be able to harness correctly.
We think that most synergistic web applications use far too much OWL, and not enough PNG.
We think that most sexy web applications use far too much ActionScript, and not enough SVG.
What does the standard industry standard industry term "sexy" really mean?
Our technology takes the best features of PGP and XForms.
Our killer feature set is unparalleled, but our sexy networks and newbie-proof use is often considered a terrific achievement.
Quick: do you have a open-source plan for managing emerging angel investors?
Think virally-distributed.
We will transition the ability of e-markets to integrate.
Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and Perl.
We will harness the term "integrated, integrated".