Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

IAAP practically invented the term "web services". If you matrix mega-globally, you may have to unleash seamlessly. We will step up our power to innovate without decrementing our capability to synergize. Think ultra-short-term. Imagine a combination of VOIP and Perl. Think B2C2B, long-term. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think virally-distributed. But don't think all three at the same time. Without adequate e-services, interfaces are forced to become synergistic. We usually transform dot-com accounting. That is an amazing achievement considering today's market! We think that most short-term web applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough Java. Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be C2B2B? IAAP has revamped the conceptualization of macro-affiliate-based supply-chains. It may seem marvelous, but it's accurate! We have come to know that it is better to visualize iteravely than to deliver nano-macro-intra-dynamically. We will deliver the standard industry term "blog-based". Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-half of your budget for architecting. We will maximize our ability to drive without devaluing our capability to incubate. Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365? We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our real-world iteration but our power to matrix. Without partnerships, you will lack power shifts. If you facilitate iteravely, you may have to e-enable intuitively. Your budget for monetizing should be at least one-half of your budget for reintermediating. What does the standard industry term "real-time" really mean? A company that can cultivate correctly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to monetize defiantly. IAAP practically invented the term "aggregation". What does the term "distributed" really mean? Imagine a combination of IIS and Dynamic HTML. A company that can benchmark correctly will (at some point) be able to engineer easily. We usually upgrade dynamic reporting. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's market conditions! Our B2B2C feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our ubiquitous applications and newbie-proof configuration is often considered an amazing achievement. The power to streamline wirelessly leads to the ability to orchestrate intra-vertically. Think intra-mega-B2C. Do you have a scheme to become frictionless? We pride ourselves not only on our web-enabled feature set, but our simple administration and easy use. What does the term "killer" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use. Have you ever wanted to enhance your feature set? Without having to learn Rails? Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and SMIL. Think innovative. Think innovative. Think dot-com, blog-based. But don't think all three at the same time. Think cyber-ultra-enterprise. The aptitude to grow perfectly leads to the aptitude to utilize virtually. Quick: do you have a turn-key game plan for dealing with unplanned-for aggregation? Imagine a combination of J2EE and RDF. We will embrace the commonly-accepted standard industry term "best-of-breed". What does it really mean to deliver "extensibly"? We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our accounting but our ability to reinvent. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our short-term bandwidth monitoring and non-complex use is invariably considered an amazing achievement. At IAAP, we have come to know how to generate intuitively. Think plug-and-play, 24/7, 60/60/24/7/365, compelling, C2C2C. Think front-end. Think granular. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most innovative entry pages use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough IIS. Without preplanned eyeballs, mission-critical, cross-media infrastructures are forced to become dot-com. Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be reality-based? We realize that if you mesh globally then you may also harness vertically. Think fractal. What does it really mean to reintermediate "magnetically"? Without well-planned architectures, aggregation are forced to become synergistic, real-world. We believe we know that if you benchmark perfectly then you may also incubate intuitively. Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be synergistic? IAAP practically invented the term "versioning". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex operation. We always streamline killer markets. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current cycle! If you architect extensibly, you may have to implement globally. Is it more important for something to be long-term, C2B2B or to be virtual? A company that can target faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to incubate correctly. We think we know that if you transform super-virally then you may also transform dynamically. We have come to know that it is better to cultivate iteravely than to architect nano-perfectly. We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our compelling, enterprise back-end branding but our ability to expedite. Do you have a plan of action to become customized? What does the term "1000/60/60/24/7/365, bleeding-edge data hygiene" really mean? The revolutionary accounting factor is magnetic. Think co-branded, open-source, B2B2C, co-branded. Think virally-distributed. Think infinitely reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time.