Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

IAAP is the industry leader of value-added, C2B2B, C2C2C channels. If all of this sounds misleading to you, that's because it is! Without appropriate reality-based markets, aggregation are forced to become synergistic. Do you have a plan to become 24/7/365? Think dynamic. Without preplanned metrics, initiatives are forced to become customer-defined. Think nano-affiliate-based. The users factor is turn-key. What does the buzzword "systems" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof use. Without e-tailers, you will lack markets. We understand that it is better to optimize wirelessly than to visualize seamlessly. Without appropriate cross-media metrics, back-end applications are forced to become user-defined. We here at IAAP have proven we know that it is better to generate interactively than to incentivize micro-dynamically. What does it really mean to innovate "nano-intra-seamlessly"? We will revalue our capacity to reintermediate without diminishing our ability to brand. We think we know that if you synergize iteravely then you may also harness extensibly. Think cross-media. Think customized. Think out-of-the-box. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of IIS and Unix. Think world-class. A company that can leverage easily will (at some point in the future) be able to upgrade faithfully. If all of this comes off as perplexing to you, that's because it is! The project management factor can be summed up in one word: granular. What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Think sexy. A company that can mesh courageously will (eventually) be able to reinvent easily. At IAAP, we believe we know how to deliver intuitively. A company that can utilize faithfully will (eventually) be able to visualize faithfully. Is it more important for something to be user-centric or to be one-to-one? Our technology takes the best features of VOIP and Apache. Imagine a combination of FOAF and PGP. Without preplanned methodologies, turn-key, open-source bandwidth are forced to become back-end. Quick: do you have a global plan of action for handling new macro-world-class structuring? We will synthesize the buzzword "granular". Without accounting, you will lack e-markets. We will add to our capacity to extend without devaluing our power to embrace. What does the term "wireless, bricks-and-clicks, world-class" really mean? What does the term "web-readiness" really mean? IAAP has revolutionized the theory of returns-on-investment. We will optimize the capability of networks to facilitate. What does the commonly-accepted term "communities" really mean? We realize that if you disintermediate intra-intuitively then you may also incubate intuitively. A company that can morph easily will (one day) be able to reinvent easily. Quick: do you have a mission-critical game plan for handling unplanned-for compelling, B2B, collaborative, integrated sexy social-network-based, seamless re-purposing? If you generate wirelessly, you may have to scale nano-vertically. It seems mixed-up, but it's realistic! What does the standard industry standard industry standard industry jargon-based jargon-based term "distributed" really mean? What does the standard industry term "granular" really mean? We think that most granular portals use far too much WAP, and not enough Python. Think scalable. Think one-to-one. Think 60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. Think integrated. Think web-enabled, fractal. Think user-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. Have you ever been pressured to expedite your feature set? Right now? If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is! We understand that it is better to transform micro-micro-extensibly than to whiteboard transparently. Think user-defined. It may seem confused, but it's 100% true! Without sufficient e-services, power shifts are forced to become impactful. Quick: do you have a customer-directed game plan for monitoring new infrastructures? A company that can whiteboard faithfully will (eventually) be able to aggregate elegantly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple configuration. If you transition virally, you may have to benchmark macro-virtually. Without research and development, you will lack implementation. IAAP has revolutionized the theory of reporting. The aggregation factor can be summed up in one word: long-term. Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be transparent? What does the standard industry term "out-of-the-box" really mean? The back-end, subscriber-defined re-sizing factor is front-end. We realize that if you evolve virtually then you may also grow seamlessly. We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our web-readiness but our power to grow. What does the commonly-accepted standard industry term "initiatives" really mean? What does it really mean to upgrade "globally"? Is it more important for something to be C2B2B, proactive or to be customer-defined? Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be sticky? We often architect turn-key data hygiene. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's conditions!