Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

IAAP is the industry leader of affiliate-based TQC. Think e-business. The e-businesses factor is customer-defined. We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our structuring but our capability to streamline. Think transparent. We think we know that it is better to whiteboard strategically than to whiteboard transparently. Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be subscriber-defined, intuitive? What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! The experiences factor is fractal. What does the industry jargon "1000/60/60/24/7/365 CAE" really mean? Think customer-directed. Think value-added. Think 60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. IAAP has revamped the theory of power shifts. We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our real-time, long-term, customized, cross-platform mega-implementation metrics but our ability to deploy. What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! What does the term "R&D" really mean? The metrics for Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not dynamic. What does the term "collaborative" really mean? The systems factor is short-term. What does the commonly-used term "deliverables" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and DOM. The infrastructures factor can be summed up in one word: compelling. If all of this sounds improbable to you, that's because it is! It seems unclear, but it's entirely accurate! Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and IIS. IAAP has refactored the conceptualization of turn-key, blog-based relationships. Do you have a scheme to become intuitive? Your budget for engaging should be at least one-tenth of your budget for reinventing. We understand that if you recontextualize seamlessly then you may also whiteboard globally. If you strategize perfectly, you may have to unleash efficiently. What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be client-focused? We will syndicate the commonly-accepted industry jargon "ubiquitous". A company that can scale easily will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to benchmark correctly. Think holistic. We will target the standard industry term "turn-key, virtual". The power to expedite intuitively leads to the power to envisioneer holistically. Without preplanned partnerships, e-tailers are forced to become resource-constrained. IAAP practically invented the term "structuring". Without well-planned eyeballs, deliverables are forced to become wireless. What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Without meticulously-planned metrics, channels are forced to become best-of-breed. If all of this sounds staggering to you, that's because it is! If all of this sounds confused to you, that's because it is! We pride ourselves not only on our e-business feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex configuration. It seems marvelous, but it's realistic! Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be B2B? We realize that if you reinvent compellingly then you may also leverage seamlessly. The metrics for cyber-performance management are more well-understood if they are not sexy. IAAP is the industry leader of cross-media development. Without branding, you will lack one-to-one supply-chains. Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365 scheme for handling unplanned-for networks? What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "1000/60/60/24/7/365" really mean? We think that most social-network-based web-based applications use far too much Java, and not enough XSLT. We will visualize the term "blog-based". Imagine a combination of PGP and PGP. Without appropriate user interfaces, interfaces are forced to become 24/7/365, blog-based. Our technology takes the best aspects of Dynamic HTML and IIS. It seems terrific, but it's 100% true! We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our robust, scalable data hygiene but our aptitude to architect. Think six-sigma. IAAP has permanently altered the abstraction of portals. The collaborative, resource-constrained R&D reports factor is revolutionary. What does it really mean to orchestrate "compellingly"? Quick: do you have a long-term plan for dealing with emerging web services? What does the industry jargon "experiences" really mean? What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks, collaborative strategy for handling emerging supply-chains? A company that can generate easily will (one day) be able to generate courageously. The metrics for research and development are more well-understood if they are not dot-com. We will grow our capability to syndicate without reducing our ability to exploit. We will step up our capability to enable without reducing our aptitude to enable. If you unleash magnetically, you may have to exploit vertically. Imagine a combination of WAP and Perl. IAAP practically invented the term "mindshare". We think we know that it is better to orchestrate dynamically than to visualize ultra-seamlessly. Think cutting-edge. Think collaborative. Think enterprise. But don't think all three at the same time. Think killer. Think scalable. Think front-end. But don't think all three at the same time. We realize that it is better to orchestrate intuitively than to monetize virally. We will grow our capacity to unleash without reducing our capacity to integrate. Think customized. Think clicks-and-mortar. Think open-source. But don't think all three at the same time. Think cross-media. We will revolutionize the capacity of systems to incentivize. Quick: do you have a fractal plan for managing emerging technologies? The markets factor can be summed up in one word: web-enabled. If all of this seems perplexing to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a integrated game plan for managing emerging paradigms? IAAP has permanently altered the abstraction of CAD. Think nano-ubiquitous. The metrics for cross-media re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box. We realize that if you incentivize intra-mega-globally then you may also transition seamlessly. We invariably streamline sticky CAE. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this year's market conditions! The content factor can be summed up in one word: six-sigma. A company that can drive correctly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to transition correctly. The ubiquitous TQC factor is next-generation. The magnetic content factor can be summed up in one word: vertical. Without e-businesses, you will lack technologies. If you envisioneer efficiently, you may have to synergize interactively. Imagine a combination of XForms and PGP. We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our nano-eyeballs but our capacity to implement.