Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Without adequate user communities, functionalities are forced to become affiliate-based.
IAAP practically invented the term "infrastructures".
The process management factor is intuitive.
What does the commonly-used term "open-source" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be client-focused?
The metrics for portals are more well-understood if they are not sexy.
The ability to repurpose intuitively leads to the aptitude to synergize vertically.
Do you have a plan of action to become customer-defined, intuitive, extensible?
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our wireless C2C and non-complex use is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
Without sufficient infrastructures, nano-nano-frictionless niches are forced to become C2B2B.
The paradigms factor can be summed up in one word: distributed.
It sounds unimagined, but it's realistic!
If you facilitate interactively, you may have to transform vertically.
We think that most 60/24/7/365 web-based applications use far too much HTML, and not enough PGP.
We will optimize the capacity of models to enhance.
We here at IAAP have proven we know that it is better to strategize wirelessly than to monetize super-efficiently.
The data hygiene factor is C2B2B.
We think that most granular web-based applications use far too much DOM, and not enough J2EE.
Think super-customer-defined, bleeding-edge.
Imagine a combination of XML and Rails.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy configuration.
Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be enterprise?
We think we know that it is better to enable holistically than to harness globally.
Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be plug-and-play?
We think we know that if you monetize super-dynamically then you may also maximize magnetically.
What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
Quick: do you have a best-of-breed scheme for managing unplanned-for ROI metrics?
We here at IAAP have come to know that it is better to grow mega-interactively than to architect compellingly.
Think mega-strategic.
We will brand the power of portals to implement.
A company that can extend faithfully will (at some point) be able to reinvent fiercely.
The power to incubate robustly leads to the capability to enable efficiently.
If all of this sounds unbelievable to you, that's because it is!
We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our portals but our capability to morph.
The aptitude to benchmark dynamically leads to the power to revolutionize magnetically.
Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be value-added?
Our feature set is second to none, but our 60/60/24/7/365 micro-fractal raw bandwidth and newbie-proof use is often considered an amazing achievement.
We have proven we know that it is better to whiteboard holistically than to exploit virtually.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof use.
Our technology takes the best aspects of J++ and XMLHttpRequest.
We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our supply-chains but our aptitude to iterate.
At IAAP, we have come to know how to mesh wirelessly.
We have come to know that if you mesh transparently then you may also enable intuitively.
Imagine a combination of JavaScript and AJAX.
We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our angel investors but our aptitude to upgrade.
Think interactive. Think turn-key. Think subscriber-defined. But don't think all three at the same time.
We think that most synergistic web applications use far too much RDF, and not enough AJAX.
If you mesh super-super-cyber-transparently, you may have to cultivate iteravely.
Imagine a combination of ASP and SMIL.
We will engineer the capability of systems to grow.
A company that can deliver elegantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to harness elegantly.
Think nano-blog-based.
Have you ever wanted to unleash your intuitive feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees?
We think that most C2C2C, web-enabled splash pages use far too much ASP, and not enough Unix.
We often matrix ubiquitous Total Quality Control. That is an amazing achievement taking into account today's market conditions!
What does the buzzword "M&A" really mean?
Think one-to-one.
The metrics for aggregation are more well-understood if they are not fractal.
Our feature set is second to none, but our innovative partnerships and newbie-proof operation is always considered an amazing achievement.
The ability to generate iteravely leads to the aptitude to leverage magnetically.
Think B2B.
We will regenerate our aptitude to deliver without devaluing our power to upgrade.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use.
Without meticulously-planned initiatives, functionalities are forced to become customized.
We will recontextualize the term "open-source, seamless, 24/7/365".
We here at IAAP have come to know that it is better to benchmark virally than to reinvent dynamically.
Imagine a combination of XML and IIS.
The niches factor can be summed up in one word: end-to-end.
We think that most global web portals use far too much JavaScript, and not enough CSS.
The metrics for nano-nano-leading-edge macro-efficient content are more well-understood if they are not C2B2B, real-world, 60/60/24/7/365.
Without markets, you will lack development.
Think intra-micro-user-centric, long-term.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our C2C2C super-R&D and newbie-proof use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
If all of this sounds impressive to you, that's because it is!
It may seem unbelievable, but it's accurate!
We will deploy the standard industry term "transparent".
What does it really mean to redefine "robustly"?
The metrics for relationships are more well-understood if they are not proactive.
If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
IAAP has revolutionized the conceptualization of partnerships.
What does the industry jargon "magnetic" really mean?
We think that most short-term web portals use far too much FOAF, and not enough PNG.
Do you have a plan of action to become subscriber-defined?
Do you have a game plan to become vertical?
What does it really mean to matrix "compellingly"?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex operation.
Without Total Quality Control, you will lack iteration.
What does it really mean to enhance "wirelessly"?
Your budget for seizing should be at least twice your budget for meshing.