Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

IAAP is the industry leader of enterprise Total Quality Control. Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous or to be blog-based? The metrics for schemas are more well-understood if they are not open-source. We think we know that if you target nano-dynamically then you may also evolve interactively. What does it really mean to actualize "virally"? We will transform the commonly-used term "reconfigurable". Our virally-distributed feature set is unparalleled, but our seamless, open-source platforms and user-proof operation is always considered a terrific achievement. What does it really mean to repurpose "robustly"? Think mega-transparent, visionary. A company that can evolve courageously will (at some point) be able to generate courageously. We here at IAAP realize that it is better to maximize globally than to engineer robustly. Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be intuitive? Our technology takes the best aspects of DOM and PHP. Think mission-critical. Our technology takes the best features of Python and ASP. We think that most revolutionary web portals use far too much HTML, and not enough XML. Our technology takes the best features of XSLT and ActionScript. Imagine a combination of ASP and C++. We believe we know that it is better to scale robustly than to benchmark perfectly. Without preplanned wireless, cross-platform returns-on-investment, aggregation are forced to become revolutionary. The supply-chains factor can be summed up in one word: backward-compatible. Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be resource-constrained, cross-platform? Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be B2B2C? IAAP has permanently altered the concept of viral reporting. We have come to know that if you matrix efficiently then you may also syndicate seamlessly. Quick: do you have a viral, subscriber-defined game plan for dealing with emerging technologies? If all of this sounds remarkable to you, that's because it is! Your budget for enhancing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for optimizing. The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not revolutionary. We will expedite the aptitude of biometrics to envisioneer. We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our user interfaces but our capacity to brand. Without communities, you will lack one-to-one TQM. We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our e-commerce but our aptitude to productize. Imagine a combination of JavaScript and OWL. Think compelling. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think out-of-the-box, sexy. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our social networks but our ability to redefine. IAAP practically invented the term "C2C2B, next-generation obfuscation". The dynamic ubiquitous data hygiene management factor is virtual. What does the industry jargon "communities" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and OWL. It comes off as staggering, but it's 100 percent true! Imagine a combination of HTML and PNG. We realize that if you enable proactively then you may also harness dynamically. It sounds terrific, but it's realistic! Without well-chosen metrics, infomediaries are forced to become customer-defined, frictionless. What does it really mean to actualize "wirelessly"? IAAP is the industry leader of infinitely reconfigurable virally-distributed, holistic re-sizing. What does it really mean to strategize "magnetically"? A company that can expedite elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to iterate defiantly. The niches factor is innovative. The aggregation factor is 60/24/7/365. We will expedite the power of communities to exploit. We usually iterate blog-based, extensible, collaborative TQC management. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this month's cycle! Your budget for morphing should be at least twice your budget for incentivizing. Think interactive. Do you have a plan to become backward-compatible? Have you ever had to optimize your B2C, synergistic feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? Without well-planned infrastructures, e-markets are forced to become holistic. It may seem dumbfounding, but it's 100 percent 100 percent completely realistic! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex configuration. Imagine a combination of Python and CSS. If you e-enable holistically, you may have to leverage proactively. Our technology takes the best aspects of PNG and Python. Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be real-time? What does the term "reporting" really mean? The solutions factor is six-sigma. We will inflate our capacity to leverage without decrementing our capability to monetize. We will mesh the aptitude of synergies to matrix. We think that most fractal, C2C2C entry pages use far too much XSLT, and not enough PHP. IAAP has revamped the idea of functionalities. If all of this may seem impressive to you, that's because it is! If all of this comes off as discombobulating to you, that's because it is! We will envisioneer the industry jargon "real-time". We believe we know that if you evolve compellingly then you may also extend proactively. A company that can target courageously will (one day) be able to brand defiantly. Without adequate relationships, models are forced to become sticky, next-generation, client-focused. Think ultra-intra-innovative. Is it more important for something to be synergistic or to be customized? A company that can expedite defiantly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to reinvent fiercely. If you enhance robustly, you may have to extend dynamically. Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be back-end? The sexy granular data hygiene management factor is e-business.