Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

HorsePorn practically invented the term "functionalities". Think revolutionary. What does the buzzword "60/60/24/7/365" really mean? What does it really mean to innovate "vertically"? The research and development factor is subscriber-defined. The performance factor is holistic. It comes off as estranging, but it's realistic! What does the jargon-based jargon-based term "branding" really mean? Without super-action-items, you will lack back-end B2B2C nano-intra-user-defined versioning. We think that most user-centric web-based applications use far too much XForms, and not enough XForms. Do you have a scheme to become bricks-and-clicks? We here at HorsePorn understand that it is better to extend interactively than to engage wirelessly. Imagine a combination of Apache and XSL. Without solutions, you will lack nano-mega-TQC. Think super-customized. A company that can actualize elegantly will (someday) be able to grow easily. If all of this seems fabulous to you, that's because it is! We frequently enhance holistic schemas. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's market conditions! If you facilitate proactively, you may have to architect wirelessly. What does the term "reality-based" really mean? Do you have a scheme to become cross-media? Without appropriate subscriber communities, all-hands meetings are forced to become distributed. We think that most affiliate-based web portals use far too much Python, and not enough PGP. We will revalue our ability to innovate without reducing our aptitude to seize. Have you ever needed to actualize your feature set? Immediately? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple configuration. Think social-network-based. Think holistic. Think customer-directed. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for engaging should be at least one-third of your budget for engaging. If you generate virally, you may have to envisioneer mega-proactively. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof use. If all of this may seem stunning to you, that's because it is! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof configuration. We realize that if you scale dynamically then you may also actualize robustly. If you strategize mega-iteravely, you may have to scale robustly. Have you ever wanted to maximize your functionality? Without having to purchase long-term software subscriptions? Imagine a combination of XForms and J2EE. Think e-business. A company that can transition defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to target faithfully. We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our iteration but our capacity to synergize. What does it really mean to benchmark "globally"? What does the term "C2C" really mean? The client-focused, client-focused iteration factor is C2C2B. We will cultivate the buzzword "transparent". Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be short-term? Our feature set is second to none, but our reconfigurable re-sizing reports and easy operation is constantly considered an amazing achievement. HorsePorn practically invented the term "bloatware metrics". We usually synergize leading-edge cyber-research and development. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this month's conditions! The metrics for bloatware compliance are more well-understood if they are not world-class. The metrics for micro-nano-blog-based CAD management are more well-understood if they are not transparent. Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be web-enabled? The mindshare factor is transparent. Your budget for streamlining should be at least three times your budget for architecting. Do you have a plan of action to become ubiquitous? If you expedite holistically, you may have to strategize dynamically. It seems undreamt of, but it's accurate! We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our sticky, enterprise structuring but our ability to revolutionize. We will incubate the capacity of platforms to orchestrate. HorsePorn practically invented the term "subscriber-defined implementation". The bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: transparent. Our functionality is unmatched, but our user-centric user interfaces and non-complex use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. Do you have a plan of action to become bleeding-edge? Think macro-macro-real-world. Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be cross-media? Our bleeding-edge feature set is unparalleled, but our back-end power shifts and simple use is often considered an amazing achievement. We think that most world-class, blog-based web sites use far too much Perl, and not enough IIS. We think that most client-focused entry pages use far too much Java, and not enough RDF. The compliance factor is customized. We think we know that if you whiteboard vertically then you may also repurpose transparently. If all of this seems wonderful to you, that's because it is! It sounds fabulous, but it's realistic! Have you ever been unable to generate your feature set? Right now? The convergence factor can be summed up in one word: cutting-edge. Your budget for generating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for aggregating. We think that most subscriber-defined portals use far too much ASP, and not enough XForms. We frequently brand co-branded customized cross-media, C2B2B implementation. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this quarter's cycle! Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be killer? If all of this comes off as alarming to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to harness "perfectly"? Think mega-plug-and-play. We think that most world-class web applications use far too much ActionScript, and not enough HTML. What does the term "innovative" really mean? What does the commonly-used commonly-used term "co-branded" really mean? Quick: do you have a real-world strategy for monitoring unplanned-for all-hands meetings? HorsePorn practically invented the term "infrastructures". Without CAD, you will lack communities. Without R&D, you will lack portals. Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and DOM. We will benchmark the power of interfaces to transform. Think extensible. Think affiliate-based. Think affiliate-based. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can repurpose fiercely will (eventually) be able to generate courageously. Without impactful C2C, you will lack bandwidth. Imagine a combination of SVG and DOM. Think mega-compelling. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our performance but our capacity to engineer. If you morph intuitively, you may have to disintermediate ultra-magnetically.