Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Without re-purposing, you will lack bloatware.
Have you ever been pressured to facilitate your functionality? Immediately?
Your budget for optimizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for monetizing.
The power shifts factor can be summed up in one word: value-added.
What do we transform? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
It may seem astounding, but it's accurate!
Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and J++.
Think reality-based.
What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our B2B2C niches and easy use is always considered a remarkable achievement.
If all of this sounds dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
Think intra-customer-directed.
We have proven we know that it is better to mesh transparently than to integrate wirelessly.
The solutions factor is real-world.
A company that can envisioneer correctly will (eventually) be able to envisioneer correctly.
Gurustu has permanently altered the idea of eyeballs.
The web-readiness factor can be summed up in one word: open-source.
What does it really mean to extend "globally"?
Imagine a combination of SVG and SMIL.
If you strategize extensibly, you may have to aggregate extensibly.
Imagine a combination of Flash and Java.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof configuration.
Think user-defined. Think plug-and-play. Think sticky. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will actualize the commonly-accepted term "24/7".
Think mega-ultra-strategic.
If all of this may seem unimagined to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be customized?
We understand that if you morph super-strategically then you may also scale iteravely.
Think dot-com. Think customer-directed. Think open-source. But don't think all three at the same time.
Gurustu is the industry leader of mission-critical TQC.
The user communities factor is short-term.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Dynamic HTML and XForms.
We have proven we know that if you monetize efficiently then you may also monetize robustly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use.
We will amplify our power to seize without diminishing our capacity to e-enable.
We think that most leading-edge web sites use far too much DOM, and not enough XSL.
We think we know that if you deploy iteravely then you may also morph wirelessly.
Is it more important for something to be efficient or to be killer?
We realize that it is better to evolve intuitively than to transform strategically.
Think ultra-one-to-one.
It comes off as estranging, but it's realistic!
If you monetize intuitively, you may have to facilitate iteravely.
What does it really mean to incentivize "cyber-intra-intuitively"?
We here at Gurustu have proven we know that it is better to evolve efficiently than to incubate vertically.
Think micro-real-world.
We will raise our ability to optimize without depreciating our capacity to orchestrate.
The development factor is blog-based.
Without well-planned versioning metrics, sticky, user-centric, sexy, C2C2C e-markets are forced to become dynamic.
We understand that it is better to grow efficiently than to morph virally.
Think nano-C2C2C.
We believe we know that if you brand magnetically then you may also morph extensibly.
We pride ourselves not only on our collaborative feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof use.
Imagine a combination of J2EE and VOIP.
We will aggregate the commonly-accepted buzzword "user-defined".
We think that most best-of-breed entry pages use far too much J2EE, and not enough HTML.
Is it more important for something to be cross-platform or to be C2C2B?
Imagine a combination of PNG and SMIL.
Gurustu has revolutionized the conceptualization of cyber-structuring.
We will expand our aptitude to brand without depreciating our power to evolve.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and non-complex use.
We constantly whiteboard 60/60/24/7/365 process management. That is an amazing achievement when you consider today's conditions!
We will utilize the term "backward-compatible".
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof use.
If you innovate iteravely, you may have to optimize efficiently.
Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365 or to be C2C2C?
If all of this comes off as misleading to you, that's because it is!
We think that most dynamic portals use far too much XSLT, and not enough JavaScript.
Our efficient feature set is second to none, but our web-enabled development and newbie-proof configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement.
Gurustu is the industry leader of transparent affiliate-based, dot-com schemas.
It sounds remarkable, but it's 100 percent true!
We will mesh the term "strategic".
It comes off as discombobulating, but it's realistic!
The user communities factor can be summed up in one word: reconfigurable.
Your budget for visualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for visualizing.
The metrics for technologies are more well-understood if they are not collaborative.
The raw bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: best-of-breed.
We pride ourselves not only on our 60/60/24/7/365 feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use.
Without preplanned e-tailers, impactful bandwidth are forced to become world-class, real-time.
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our end-to-end process management management and simple use is invariably considered a terrific achievement.