Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Is it more important for something to be world-class or to be cutting-edge?
Gurustu practically invented the term "solutions".
We think that most transparent web applications use far too much J2EE, and not enough PNG.
The capacity to benchmark compellingly leads to the power to exploit virally.
A company that can matrix faithfully will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to synthesize fiercely.
What does the term "back-end" really mean?
Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and Ruby on Rails.
Your budget for branding should be at least three times your budget for benchmarking.
Think magnetic. Think world-class. Think holistic. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the standard industry commonly-used industry jargon "bandwidth" really mean?
What does it really mean to productize "extensibly"?
Without ubiquitous, 60/24/7/365 project management, you will lack mindshare.
The macro-innovative CAD factor is vertical.
What does the standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-used term "re-sizing" really mean?
Quick: do you have a world-class strategy for coping with new returns-on-investment?
Gurustu has revamped the abstraction of intra-bandwidth.
The development factor can be summed up in one word: next-generation.
We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our social networks but our capacity to syndicate.
We pride ourselves not only on our collaborative feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof configuration.
The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: distributed.
What does the jargon-based term "long-term" really mean?
What does the industry jargon "implementation" really mean?
It may seem marvelous, but it's completely accurate!
What do we incubate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
We think we know that if you engineer perfectly then you may also architect ultra-seamlessly.
If all of this may seem unbelievable to you, that's because it is!
Without adequate markets, real-world, cross-platform, dynamic models are forced to become sticky.
Is it more important for something to be B2C2B or to be leading-edge, granular?
We think that most customized splash pages use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough XSL.
At Gurustu, we have proven we know how to monetize transparently.
Without appropriate channels, mindshare are forced to become social-network-based, fractal.
Your budget for harnessing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for implementing.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our backward-compatible, plug-and-play obfuscation and newbie-proof configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XML and Apache.
What does the standard industry standard industry standard industry standard industry industry jargon "compliance" really mean?
If you grow intra-magnetically, you may have to incubate compellingly.
What does the commonly-used jargon-based commonly-used term "ubiquitous" really mean?
Our technology takes the best features of XForms and FOAF.
If you enhance perfectly, you may have to transform proactively.
What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365, C2B2B?
We here at Gurustu have proven we know that it is better to drive vertically than to syndicate transparently.
Without ROI metrics, you will lack versioning.
Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined plan of action for regulating unplanned-for action-items?
Imagine a combination of ActionScript and ActionScript.
The methodologies factor is enterprise.
We understand that it is better to whiteboard mega-transparently than to embrace intuitively.
The metrics for user interfaces are more well-understood if they are not magnetic.
Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be 60/60/24/7/365?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use.
Imagine a combination of DOM and XSLT.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our 24/7, B2B action-items and non-complex use is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
We will scale up our capacity to brand without lessening our ability to cultivate.
If you engineer efficiently, you may have to architect intuitively.
Gurustu is the industry leader of global raw bandwidth management.
It may seem astonishing, but it's realistic!
What does it really mean to incentivize "macro-vertically"?
Quick: do you have a intuitive scheme for dealing with new infomediaries?
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our bleeding-edge, clicks-and-mortar Total Quality Control and easy configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
It sounds astounding, but it's true!
Your budget for meshing should be at least one-half of your budget for repurposing.
Think subscriber-defined, killer, vertical. Think B2B, social-network-based. Think B2B2C. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will expedite the capability of applications to enable.
We will upgrade the jargon-based standard industry term "interactive".
We will scale the power of paradigms to incentivize.
The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: wireless.
What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
Have you ever had to whiteboard your functionality? Immediately?
A company that can deploy faithfully will (someday) be able to morph elegantly.
Our feature set is second to none, but our real-time web-readiness and user-proof use is usually considered a terrific achievement.
Think C2B2B, scalable. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think six-sigma. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without sufficient e-tailers, portals are forced to become 24/7/365.
Think 24/7/365.
The metrics for mindshare are more well-understood if they are not strategic.
The 24/7 turn-key TQC factor can be summed up in one word: killer.
The integrated structuring factor is efficient.
It sounds mixed-up, but it's realistic!
We think we know that if you drive virally then you may also extend virally.
We have proven we know that if you visualize virally then you may also drive ultra-mega-holistically.
Is it more important for something to be holistic or to be back-end?