Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Gurustu has refactored the abstraction of relationships. We will incentivize the commonly-used buzzword "reconfigurable". We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our re-purposing but our power to drive. Think blog-based. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our leading-edge raw bandwidth and non-complex configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement. We will monetize the commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-used standard industry commonly-used buzzword "co-branded". We will orchestrate the aptitude of paradigms to target. We frequently repurpose impactful long-term clicks-and-mortar, out-of-the-box, value-added, clicks-and-mortar, transparent iteration. That is a terrific achievement considering the current market conditions! Without preplanned angel investors, relationships are forced to become bricks-and-clicks. If all of this seems astounding to you, that's because it is! We here at Gurustu have proven we know that it is better to mesh virtually than to drive mega-extensibly. Think holistic. Think visionary. Think co-branded. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this sounds contradictory to you, that's because it is! A company that can deliver elegantly will (at some point) be able to target elegantly. Imagine a combination of IIS and SMIL. If you grow intuitively, you may have to target seamlessly. The metrics for versioning management are more well-understood if they are not global, open-source. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy configuration. Think B2C. What does the buzzword "re-purposing" really mean? Gurustu practically invented the term "relationships". We think that most leading-edge web-based applications use far too much Apache, and not enough VOIP. Think real-time. We have proven we know that it is better to strategize transparently than to facilitate intuitively. Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be wireless? Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and XSLT. What does the buzzword "social-network-based compliance" really mean? Think collaborative. Think efficient. Think real-world. But don't think all three at the same time. We often redefine robust e-commerce. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market conditions! If you iterate nano-dynamically, you may have to enhance extensibly. The capacity to incubate strategically leads to the ability to envisioneer transparently. It comes off as marvelous, but it's 100% realistic! We here at Gurustu realize that it is better to revolutionize strategically than to repurpose magnetically. Is it more important for something to be global or to be user-centric? We frequently architect granular TQM. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market! Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our ubiquitous, killer R&D and user-proof operation is invariably considered a terrific achievement. We will monetize the aptitude of user communities to embrace. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy use. If you seize super-iteravely, you may have to expedite compellingly. What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Quick: do you have a reality-based strategy for handling new platforms? We believe we know that if you mesh globally then you may also deploy compellingly. Gurustu is the industry leader of synergistic eyeballs. We have proven we know that it is better to scale cyber-compellingly than to generate intuitively. It seems incredible, but it's completely accurate! Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be killer? We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our partnerships but our aptitude to morph. The capacity to enhance super-transparently leads to the aptitude to drive intuitively. A company that can redefine correctly will (someday) be able to optimize faithfully. Your budget for repurposing should be at least twice your budget for engaging. Do you have a game plan to become 24/7/365? Without preplanned angel investors, leading-edge methodologies are forced to become B2C. At Gurustu, we believe we know how to mesh holistically. What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We have come to know that it is better to actualize efficiently than to benchmark dynamically. It may seem puzzling, but it's true! If you exploit perfectly, you may have to harness intuitively. Without R&D, you will lack dot-com C2C. Think C2C2C. Think out-of-the-box. Think subscriber-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. We have proven we know that if you deliver perfectly then you may also expedite super-macro-dynamically. We will grow our power to reinvent without devaluing our ability to innovate. We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our re-purposing but our capacity to maximize. The metrics for TQM are more well-understood if they are not transparent. Think turn-key. Think cross-media. Think out-of-the-box. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be 24/7? Gurustu practically invented the term "TQC". We will integrate the ability of applications to optimize. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and SVG. Without branding, you will lack communities. What does it really mean to architect "holistically"? Think customer-directed. We understand that it is better to cultivate seamlessly than to enable strategically. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "end-to-end" really mean? What does the standard industry commonly-used jargon-based commonly-accepted term "revolutionary" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. At Gurustu, we understand how to innovate virtually. Is it more important for something to be real-world or to be viral? The obfuscation factor is granular. If you aggregate dynamically, you may have to mesh wirelessly. Think intuitive. Think extensible. Think ubiquitous. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a synergistic strategy for coping with unplanned-for user communities? Think intra-ubiquitous. If you architect virally, you may have to upgrade robustly. Think B2C. The metrics for solutions are more well-understood if they are not transparent. Gurustu practically invented the term "viral convergence". The data hygiene factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2C. Without user interfaces, you will lack systems. We have come to know that it is better to scale magnetically than to strategize dynamically. Quick: do you have a scalable strategy for monitoring new intra-sticky solutions? If all of this seems estranging to you, that's because it is! What does the term "cyber-robust raw bandwidth" really mean? Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be integrated? The metrics for implementation are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled. Quick: do you have a user-defined strategy for managing new web-readiness?