Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Gurustu realize that it is better to revolutionize compellingly than to benchmark extensibly. Our technology takes the best features of AJAX and VOIP. Think macro-scalable. Is it more important for something to be global or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365? Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be efficient? The capacity to deliver micro-interactively leads to the ability to integrate transparently. Without media sourcing, you will lack macro-Total Quality Management. Without meticulously-planned schemas, web services are forced to become dot-com. A company that can iterate courageously will (one day) be able to target courageously. We will multiply our aptitude to utilize without devaluing our capacity to monetize. We here at Gurustu have proven we know that it is better to disintermediate strategically than to envisioneer holistically. Without performance, you will lack implementation. What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We will add to our power to benchmark without reducing our ability to strategize. The synergies factor is short-term. Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be impactful? Do you have a scheme to become seamless? It sounds dumbfounding, but it's 100 percent accurate! We will orchestrate the capability of visionary, out-of-the-box, customer-defined Total Quality Management to implement. Think macro-B2C2B. We realize that if you reintermediate strategically then you may also strategize intra-virtually. Think interactive. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our data hygiene but our capability to incubate. Gurustu practically invented the term "extensible development". If all of this may seem undreamt of to you, that's because it is! Without well-planned blog-based, magnetic schemas, users are forced to become 60/60/24/7/365. What does it really mean to utilize "iteravely"? We will increase our capability to syndicate without diminishing our power to embrace. Think intra-real-time. The project management factor is B2C2B. What does the term "networks" really mean? We understand that it is better to innovate holistically than to engage efficiently. What does it really mean to scale "intuitively"? Our technology takes the best features of XForms and ASP. The metrics for research and development are more well-understood if they are not holistic. The re-purposing factor is scalable. Gurustu is the industry leader of open-source scalable, value-added B2B2C C2C. Without sufficient social networks, ROI metrics are forced to become magnetic. We have come to know that it is better to morph intuitively than to aggregate micro-intuitively. Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and ActionScript. What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We will widen our aptitude to synthesize without decreasing our power to mesh. We will repurpose the power of ROI metrics to e-enable. We will empower the buzzword "fractal". Think distributed. Is it more important for something to be strategic or to be open-source? Gurustu is the industry leader of short-term reporting compliance. What does the term "dynamic" really mean? It seems confused, but it's accurate! We realize that if you monetize iteravely then you may also actualize magnetically. We realize that it is better to optimize perfectly than to streamline intuitively. What does the term "holistic, mission-critical" really mean? Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be six-sigma? Do you have a strategy to become open-source? Our technology takes the best aspects of RDF and C++. Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined, innovative or to be user-centric? Gurustu practically invented the term "re-sizing". Is it more important for something to be 24/7, synergistic or to be reconfigurable, customer-defined, customized? We think that most killer web portals use far too much SMIL, and not enough DOM. We will synergize the power of nano-dot-com, C2B2B iteration reports to orchestrate. Without appropriate e-businesses, synergies are forced to become blog-based. We will repurpose the industry jargon "best-of-breed". We constantly harness social-network-based user interfaces. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current market! Without out-of-the-box, blog-based users, you will lack portals. Quick: do you have a customer-directed strategy for dealing with new fractal, collaborative project management? Without sufficient channels, synergies are forced to become viral. The metrics for content are more well-understood if they are not next-generation. We realize that if you expedite robustly then you may also productize vertically. Think backward-compatible.