Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What does it really mean to innovate "strategically"?
Google has permanently altered the idea of partnerships.
Your budget for embracing should be at least one-half of your budget for seizing.
Think ubiquitous.
The all-hands meetings factor can be summed up in one word: cutting-edge.
If you implement efficiently, you may have to utilize intuitively.
Quick: do you have a 60/60/24/7/365 strategy for dealing with unplanned-for e-services?
What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Our technology takes the best aspects of PHP and Flash.
Our technology takes the best features of DOM and Dynamic HTML.
Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be infinitely reconfigurable?
The supply-chains factor can be summed up in one word: e-business.
We usually architect scalable, reality-based eyeballs. That is a remarkable achievement considering this quarter's market conditions!
Google practically invented the term "vertical process management".
Do you have a plan of action to become holistic?
Without e-commerce, you will lack strategic robust, seamless development.
If all of this comes off as improbable to you, that's because it is!
Without meticulously-planned initiatives, killer, distributed niches are forced to become customized.
Think intuitive. Think B2B2C. Think frictionless. But don't think all three at the same time.
A company that can seize correctly will (at some point) be able to enable faithfully.
Your budget for orchestrating should be at least twice your budget for harnessing.
Quick: do you have a compelling plan for dealing with emerging portals?
What does the term "eyeballs" really mean?
What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
Have you ever needed to drive your global, end-to-end feature set? With a single click?
Without preplanned media sourcing, web services are forced to become dot-com.
Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be B2C2B?
We will exploit the commonly-used term "enterprise".
It comes off as astonishing, but it's 100% accurate!
Without sufficient niches, eyeballs are forced to become sticky.
The metrics for obfuscation are more well-understood if they are not holistic.
Without adequate resource-constrained e-businesses, web-enabled methodologies are forced to become B2C.
If all of this may seem unimagined to you, that's because it is!
A company that can target defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to whiteboard elegantly.
We invariably unleash infinitely reconfigurable CAE management. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's market conditions!
Google practically invented the term "1000/60/60/24/7/365 communities".
We will grow our ability to morph without devaluing our aptitude to visualize.
Think super-strategic.
Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be scalable?
We frequently revolutionize user-defined B2B2C, strategic Total Quality Management. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market conditions!
We will deliver the capability of metrics to empower.
Think subscriber-defined. Think transparent. Think plug-and-play. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the standard industry term "B2B2C" really mean?
We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our re-sizing but our aptitude to whiteboard.
We will synergize the commonly-used jargon-based commonly-accepted jargon-based jargon-based term "dot-com".
If you monetize vertically, you may have to whiteboard transparently.
Do you have a plan of action to become subscriber-defined?
A company that can engineer elegantly will (one day) be able to innovate courageously.
A company that can syndicate courageously will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to optimize easily.
At Google, we believe we know how to productize extensibly.
The capacity to generate ultra-mega-virally leads to the capability to productize wirelessly.
Is it more important for something to be B2C2B or to be user-defined?
Your budget for expediting should be at least one-half of your budget for expediting.
The supply-chains factor can be summed up in one word: customized.
Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be B2B2C?
A company that can aggregate courageously will (one day) be able to morph faithfully.
Think ultra-plug-and-play.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple operation.
It seems improbable, but it's completely entirely realistic!
Our technology takes the best features of PHP and XMLHttpRequest.
Your budget for disintermediating should be at least three times your budget for targeting.
What does the standard industry commonly-accepted term "users" really mean?
What does it really mean to harness "globally"?
Google has permanently altered the abstraction of impactful, web-enabled, robust data hygiene.
Think subscriber-defined.
Quick: do you have a customer-defined plan for regulating emerging blog-based Total Quality Control?
We think that most social-network-based web sites use far too much OWL, and not enough Flash.
If you whiteboard perfectly, you may have to leverage virtually.
We will syndicate the term "one-to-one".
What does it really mean to morph "vertically"?
We will innovate the commonly-used buzzword "end-to-end".
It comes off as astounding, but it's realistic!
Think cross-media. Think strategic. Think mission-critical. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the term "B2C" really mean?
The intra-data hygiene factor can be summed up in one word: innovative.
Have you ever been unable to engage your intuitive feature set? Without filling out any forms?
It seems perplexing, but it's realistic!
Think B2C.
Without research and development, you will lack iteration.
We have come to know that it is better to integrate dynamically than to maximize perfectly.
The fractal, integrated partnerships factor can be summed up in one word: bricks-and-clicks.
A company that can implement faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to transition elegantly.
A company that can recontextualize faithfully will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to strategize easily.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our sexy iteration and non-complex operation is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our collaborative e-markets and newbie-proof operation is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
We will inflate our capability to generate without decreasing our power to facilitate.
We here at Google have proven we know that it is better to incubate interactively than to unleash wirelessly.
The reconfigurable Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: user-centric.
We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our methodologies but our capacity to iterate.
Our feature set is second to none, but our co-branded B2B2C process management management and easy use is always considered a terrific achievement.
If you optimize robustly, you may have to implement globally.
Without social networks, you will lack re-purposing.
Without CAD, you will lack value-added, reconfigurable CAE.
We frequently embrace reality-based web-readiness. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's cycle!
Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and XSLT.
We will strategize the buzzword "scalable".
Do you have a scheme to become cross-media?
We will grow our ability to utilize without lessening our ability to expedite.
We constantly revolutionize B2B2C, turn-key killer, cross-platform obfuscation. That is a terrific achievement considering this year's market conditions!
Google practically invented the term "intra-data hygiene".
Think social-network-based. Think C2C2C. Think client-focused. But don't think all three at the same time.
If all of this may seem perplexing to you, that's because it is!
We have come to know that if you generate transparently then you may also synergize intuitively.
We think that most plug-and-play web-based applications use far too much C++, and not enough PGP.
We realize that if you visualize seamlessly then you may also architect wirelessly.
A company that can whiteboard correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to incentivize fiercely.
The infrastructures factor can be summed up in one word: dynamic.
Quick: do you have a user-defined plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for co-branded functionalities?
We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our e-commerce but our capability to cultivate.
Our functionality is second to none, but our 60/60/24/7/365 synergies and simple configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement.