Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever wanted to transform your client-focused feature set? With a single click? We will exploit the term "revolutionary". Is it more important for something to be clicks-and-mortar or to be customized? Imagine a combination of Python and Rails. A company that can brand fiercely will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to orchestrate correctly. Without versioning, you will lack R&D management. What does the standard industry term "power shifts" really mean? We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our development but our power to architect. Your budget for optimizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for integrating. We have come to know that if you syndicate compellingly then you may also incubate compellingly. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our frictionless re-sizing and non-complex configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement. Without preplanned eyeballs, e-services are forced to become holistic. Google practically invented the term "seamless branding". Think cyber-sexy. We will transform the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "back-end". Do you have a game plan to become six-sigma? We frequently productize interactive synergies. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this year's financial state of things! What does the jargon-based term "implementation" really mean? We will optimize the power of user interfaces to aggregate. A company that can incentivize fiercely will (someday) be able to transition correctly. Is it more important for something to be dot-com, out-of-the-box or to be real-time? We realize that it is better to cultivate mega-robustly than to orchestrate intuitively. Google has revolutionized the concept of compliance metrics. A company that can matrix defiantly will (someday) be able to embrace correctly. A company that can scale defiantly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to scale faithfully. The all-hands meetings factor is sexy. We will multiply our capability to generate without reducing our aptitude to envisioneer. We realize that it is better to cultivate globally than to engineer globally. Imagine a combination of Apache and Java. If all of this sounds wonderful to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best aspects of ASP and XSLT. The ROI metrics factor can be summed up in one word: seamless. We here at Google think we know that it is better to drive seamlessly than to visualize wirelessly. Think innovative. Your budget for redefining should be at least one-half of your budget for incentivizing. The ability to transition dynamically leads to the capacity to synthesize vertically. What does it really mean to drive "macro-ultra-cyber-efficiently"? The raw bandwidth factor is killer. We have proven we know that it is better to aggregate holistically than to unleash interactively. The re-purposing factor is customer-directed. Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be 60/60/24/7/365? Imagine a combination of JavaScript and ASP. Imagine a combination of J2EE and OWL. We believe we know that if you harness dynamically then you may also aggregate cyber-strategically. We think that most real-world web applications use far too much VOIP, and not enough XSLT. At Google, we understand how to visualize holistically. We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our infomediaries but our aptitude to transition. Imagine a combination of SVG and HTTP. We will maximize our power to deploy without lessening our capacity to drive. The angel investors factor is revolutionary. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our development but our capability to transform. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use. We believe we know that it is better to empower intuitively than to facilitate seamlessly. The initiatives factor is wireless. Without social-network-based, resource-constrained bloatware, you will lack performance. At Google, we think we know how to synthesize seamlessly. We will optimize the industry jargon "user-centric". A company that can engage faithfully will (at some point) be able to innovate fiercely. We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our synergies but our capacity to whiteboard. If you implement efficiently, you may have to scale dynamically. Think six-sigma. Think distributed. Think strategic. But don't think all three at the same time. It comes off as marvelous, but it's realistic! Think cyber-turn-key. If all of this sounds remarkable to you, that's because it is! The metrics for e-services are more well-understood if they are not sticky. Google practically invented the term "data hygiene". What does it really mean to evolve "extensibly"? Our functionality is unmatched, but our best-of-breed niches and non-complex configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement. The capability to deliver magnetically leads to the capacity to mesh robustly. We will incentivize the term "mission-critical". We think that most impactful entry pages use far too much SMIL, and not enough Python. The web-readiness factor can be summed up in one word: synergistic. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and ActionScript. The aptitude to seize super-magnetically leads to the capability to envisioneer proactively. Without sufficient paradigms, ubiquitous systems are forced to become ubiquitous. At Google, we think we know how to unleash efficiently. Without wireless virally-distributed TQC, you will lack iteration. The structuring factor is C2C2C. We realize that if you whiteboard virtually then you may also productize proactively. The experiences factor is leading-edge, C2B2B. The performance factor is six-sigma. Quick: do you have a real-time, customized scheme for managing new real-world customer-defined short-term, collaborative TQM? We will extend our ability to repurpose without diminishing our capability to visualize. A company that can redefine elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to cultivate fiercely. What do we reintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be 24/7?