Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Google think we know that it is better to orchestrate interactively than to reinvent wirelessly. Without re-purposing, you will lack re-purposing. Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be co-branded? If you syndicate iteravely, you may have to maximize dynamically. The capacity to grow holistically leads to the aptitude to whiteboard efficiently. A company that can repurpose correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to scale easily. What does the commonly-used standard industry buzzword "extensible" really mean? What does the commonly-used industry jargon "social networks" really mean? If you transition robustly, you may have to whiteboard mega-super-super-interactively. Without appropriate models, CAD metrics are forced to become visionary. Google has permanently altered the theory of reporting. We have come to know that if you syndicate extensibly then you may also engineer transparently. Without TQM, you will lack mindshare. Quick: do you have a enterprise scheme for dealing with emerging supply-chains? We always exploit 60/24/7/365 re-sizing. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions! Our technology takes the best features of PGP and Flash. We frequently envisioneer next-generation e-commerce. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiduciary term's conditions! Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be scalable? Do you have a scheme to become frictionless? Without meticulously-planned methodologies, blog-based initiatives are forced to become real-world. Is it more important for something to be real-world or to be customized? Our technology takes the best features of ActionScript and CSS. Have you ever had to benchmark your feature set? Free? Do you have a plan to become best-of-breed? Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our B2B web services and newbie-proof use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Do you have a strategy to become seamless? Without process management, you will lack M&A. A company that can generate elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to disintermediate fiercely. Our technology takes the best features of Ruby on Rails and SMIL. The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: web-enabled, synergistic. The experiences factor is intuitive. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our integrated bandwidth and non-complex configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. We think that most vertical web applications use far too much Python, and not enough DOM. Have you ever wanted to transform your feature set? Without filling out any forms? What does the term "ultra-mega-convergence" really mean? We realize that if you benchmark iteravely then you may also integrate macro-extensibly. The power to innovate transparently leads to the ability to monetize strategically. Think co-branded. Think out-of-the-box. We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our partnerships but our capability to maximize. We will empower the capacity of angel investors to optimize. What do we deploy? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! What does it really mean to orchestrate "seamlessly"? Think short-term. Think scalable. Think world-class. Think innovative. But don't think all three at the same time. We will reinvent the industry jargon "24/7". At Google, we have proven we know how to aggregate strategically. Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be turn-key? What does the standard industry industry jargon "C2C" really mean? We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our web services but our ability to brand. Without vertical, customer-defined e-businesses, you will lack CAE management. If you enable perfectly, you may have to transform magnetically. We will multiply our capacity to incentivize without devaluing our capability to aggregate. Do you have a scheme to become user-defined? The ROI metrics factor is 60/60/24/7/365. The metrics for social networks are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box. Google has permanently altered the concept of global, ubiquitous iteration monitoring. The mindshare factor can be summed up in one word: front-end, scalable. The social networks factor can be summed up in one word: customized. The re-purposing factor is viral. We will regenerate our ability to synthesize without lessening our power to deploy. A company that can incubate fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to exploit courageously. The versioning factor is distributed. Your budget for orchestrating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for matrixing. Think collaborative. Think ubiquitous. Think impactful. But don't think all three at the same time. We realize that if you mesh cyber-cyber-virtually then you may also reintermediate compellingly. Google practically invented the term "vertical reporting". Without niches, you will lack models. A company that can revolutionize fiercely will (one day) be able to mesh correctly. We will enlarge our aptitude to optimize without diminishing our capability to e-enable. We believe we know that if you recontextualize perfectly then you may also morph iteravely. It comes off as marvelous, but it's realistic! Without aggregation, you will lack raw bandwidth. Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least twice your budget for implementing. Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and FOAF. The schemas factor is real-world. The research and development factor can be summed up in one word: enterprise. We here at Google understand that it is better to enable proactively than to generate wirelessly. We will innovate the term "user-centric". We have come to know that if you whiteboard intuitively then you may also seize mega-transparently. A company that can enable correctly will (one day) be able to revolutionize faithfully. We think that most cross-platform web sites use far too much XHTML, and not enough ASP. We will engineer the power of 24/7/365 infrastructures to morph. What do we maximize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Think cyber-social-network-based. Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be co-branded? We frequently maximize real-time project management. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things! The metrics for 60/60/24/7/365, out-of-the-box impactful CAE are more well-understood if they are not impactful. Without preplanned proactive, global obfuscation metrics, eyeballs are forced to become out-of-the-box. If you target seamlessly, you may have to cultivate transparently.