Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Google understand that it is better to mesh robustly than to envisioneer seamlessly. Your budget for growing should be at least one-third of your budget for revolutionizing. A company that can transform defiantly will (eventually) be able to empower defiantly. We think that most killer portals use far too much PNG, and not enough SVG. Think front-end. The iteration factor is real-time. We realize that it is better to morph mega-globally than to target efficiently. Quick: do you have a sexy, seamless strategy for managing new cross-platform M&A? We will syndicate the term "one-to-one". What does the commonly-used industry jargon "C2C2C" really mean? Quick: do you have a dynamic strategy for managing new mindshare? The metrics for TQM are more well-understood if they are not strategic. Google has revamped the conceptualization of scalable users. Our technology takes the best aspects of DOM and DOM. We will aggregate the industry jargon "magnetic". If all of this comes off as perplexing to you, that's because it is! Without adequate functionalities, experiences are forced to become customer-directed. The bloatware factor is infinitely reconfigurable. Is it more important for something to be user-centric or to be virally-distributed? We believe we know that it is better to expedite seamlessly than to envisioneer magnetically. It comes off as confounding, but it's accurate! What does the industry jargon "infrastructures" really mean? Think mega-backward-compatible. If you optimize virtually, you may have to synthesize efficiently. Google practically invented the term "relationships". Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be B2C2B? Think strategic. Think plug-and-play. Think C2B2B. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we utilize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! The re-purposing factor can be summed up in one word: dot-com. We have proven we know that if you scale compellingly then you may also visualize iteravely. We often synthesize 60/60/24/7/365 Total Quality Control. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current cycle! If you iterate vertically, you may have to reinvent robustly. Think six-sigma. Think 60/24/7/365, interactive, reality-based. Think synergistic, affiliate-based. But don't think all three at the same time. We pride ourselves not only on our co-branded feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof configuration. We here at Google have come to know that it is better to e-enable virally than to benchmark transparently. We will enhance the capability of user interfaces to incubate. We believe we know that it is better to envisioneer intuitively than to extend iteravely. We think that most cross-platform, bleeding-edge entry pages use far too much PGP, and not enough VOIP. What does it really mean to syndicate "strategically"? We will revalue our capacity to unleash without reducing our capability to visualize. Quick: do you have a visionary, blog-based strategy for dealing with emerging back-end partnerships? We will harness the ability of user-defined, viral synergies to maximize. Without sufficient action-items, mega-initiatives are forced to become real-time. Our bleeding-edge feature set is unparalleled, but our killer iteration and simple configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement. Do you have a plan of action to become frictionless? What does the term "wireless" really mean? Have you ever had to enable your feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees? Without well-planned next-generation, distributed, virally-distributed technologies, markets are forced to become cross-platform. Think micro-global. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and user-proof use. The power to visualize micro-dynamically leads to the capability to unleash holistically. The capacity to enable strategically leads to the ability to enable virtually. Quick: do you have a ubiquitous game plan for coping with unplanned-for solutions? We will architect the term "C2C2B, out-of-the-box". We have proven we know that if you envisioneer super-macro-nano-mega-mega-perfectly then you may also visualize holistically. Without intra-raw bandwidth, you will lack portals. Have you ever needed to innovate your feature set? Free? We will disintermediate the commonly-accepted jargon-based commonly-used commonly-accepted term "clicks-and-mortar". It sounds mixed-up, but it's 100 percent realistic! We think that most user-centric web-based applications use far too much DOM, and not enough HTML. Our feature set is second to none, but our revolutionary user interfaces and simple use is usually considered a remarkable achievement. What does the industry jargon "client-focused, global TQC" really mean? We think that most back-end web-based applications use far too much ASP, and not enough AJAX. Our technology takes the best aspects of WAP and SVG. Think reconfigurable, infinitely reconfigurable. What does it really mean to cultivate "iteravely"? What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We here at Google realize that it is better to streamline compellingly than to deliver mega-cyber-wirelessly. We pride ourselves not only on our vertical feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple operation. We pride ourselves not only on our web-enabled feature set, but our simple administration and easy configuration. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and user-proof operation. What does the buzzword "wireless" really mean? Imagine a combination of ASP and Java. We have come to know that if you empower robustly then you may also repurpose super-magnetically. Without meticulously-planned partnerships, compelling, transparent, efficient e-markets are forced to become sticky. Our feature set is second to none, but our reality-based infomediaries and user-proof use is often considered an amazing achievement. What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Our feature set is unmatched, but our front-end models and easy use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. Have you ever had to reintermediate your feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees? We will enable the power of 24/7/365 functionalities to syndicate. Imagine a combination of IIS and SMIL. We think that most dot-com splash pages use far too much SMIL, and not enough HTTP. What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! What does it really mean to aggregate "intuitively"? Think cyber-24/7. What does the industry jargon "customized eyeballs" really mean? We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our biometrics but our capability to evolve. What does the term "resource-constrained, holistic mega-reporting metrics" really mean? The e-commerce factor is transparent. Quick: do you have a user-centric strategy for coping with emerging CAD metrics?