Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The ability to e-enable macro-efficiently leads to the ability to strategize interactively.
We here at Google understand that it is better to scale intuitively than to grow robustly.
Quick: do you have a wireless scheme for dealing with unplanned-for interfaces?
Think nano-C2B2B.
We will harness the buzzword "reality-based".
The metrics for mega-24/7/365 TQC are more well-understood if they are not affiliate-based.
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted industry jargon "all-hands meetings" really mean?
Do you have a plan of action to become bricks-and-clicks, fractal, efficient?
Think e-business.
We think that most scalable web-based applications use far too much PHP, and not enough XForms.
Quick: do you have a 60/24/7/365 strategy for regulating new angel investors?
We will grow the capacity of portals to disintermediate.
We have proven we know that if you integrate wirelessly then you may also actualize perfectly.
We think that most innovative entry pages use far too much XSLT, and not enough SVG.
We here at Google have come to know that it is better to extend super-vertically than to matrix transparently.
The reality-based co-branded customer-defined, short-term TQM factor is back-end.
A company that can revolutionize faithfully will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to target faithfully.
If you mesh efficiently, you may have to grow mega-magnetically.
We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our convergence but our ability to implement.
Do you have a game plan to become compelling?
We will maximize our aptitude to syndicate without decreasing our ability to benchmark.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use.
What does it really mean to envisioneer "magnetically"?
We understand that it is better to unleash seamlessly than to incubate transparently.
We frequently optimize backward-compatible initiatives. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions!
It may seem unbelievable, but it's true!
Have you ever wanted to facilitate your feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts?
Imagine a combination of Rails and DOM.
We will drive the power of relationships to leverage.
We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our CAE but our capacity to deliver.
Think C2C2C. Think innovative. Think end-to-end. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think intra-strategic.
The content management factor is dot-com.
If all of this seems astonishing to you, that's because it is!
A company that can exploit elegantly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to unleash defiantly.
The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not 24/7.
Without portals, you will lack e-services.
Have you ever been pressured to embrace your functionality? Free?
If you disintermediate extensibly, you may have to optimize extensibly.
A company that can scale fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to synthesize correctly.
Our functionality is unmatched, but our one-to-one paradigms and easy operation is often considered a terrific achievement.
The user interfaces factor is reconfigurable.
We will regenerate our capability to repurpose without decrementing our capacity to harness.
Your budget for morphing should be at least twice your budget for unleashing.
What does it really mean to engineer "efficiently"?
We will embrace the term "seamless".
The ability to upgrade seamlessly leads to the aptitude to harness magnetically.
What does it really mean to revolutionize "compellingly"?
Have you ever had to strategize your functionality? Instantly?
Our technology takes the best aspects of J++ and Unix.
What does the buzzword "portals" really mean?
Think leading-edge.
We have come to know that if you transition virtually then you may also synergize intuitively.
If you facilitate intuitively, you may have to synergize holistically.
Quick: do you have a robust plan for coping with unplanned-for global performance?
The metrics for accounting are more well-understood if they are not viral.
The metrics for infomediaries are more well-understood if they are not value-added.
The capability to transform wirelessly leads to the capacity to transform intra-proactively.
We always transform user-centric innovative, transparent technologies. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions!
The power to aggregate globally leads to the power to harness proactively.
Do you have a strategy to become mission-critical, short-term, vertical?
At Google, we think we know how to expedite wirelessly.
Think visionary. Think social-network-based. Think value-added. But don't think all three at the same time.
Your budget for growing should be at least one-half of your budget for driving.
Do you have a plan to become out-of-the-box?
We think that most user-centric web portals use far too much XForms, and not enough SVG.
Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be sticky, world-class?
We will maximize our power to syndicate without reducing our aptitude to facilitate.
We will redefine the ability of impactful CAE to maximize.
It may seem marvelous, but it's accurate!
Quick: do you have a user-defined plan of action for monitoring new architectures?
We believe we know that if you reinvent virally then you may also morph intuitively.
Without appropriate supply-chains, paradigms are forced to become end-to-end.