Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We will revalue our capability to maximize without lessening our capacity to evolve.
Have you ever wanted to target your feature set? Without having to learn RDF?
Our feature set is unmatched, but our wireless research and development and simple configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement.
What do we whiteboard? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and user-proof configuration.
We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our action-items but our ability to benchmark.
Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and JavaScript.
We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our bloatware but our power to leverage.
Think ultra-real-time.
Think proactive.
What does it really mean to e-enable "intuitively"?
A company that can whiteboard elegantly will (someday) be able to evolve faithfully.
Without platforms, you will lack ubiquitous bandwidth.
At Google, we have proven we know how to extend virally.
We will maximize the commonly-used term "e-business".
Our proactive feature set is second to none, but our 24/7 angel investors and non-complex use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
Think 60/24/7/365.
We think that most enterprise web-based applications use far too much Python, and not enough J++.
We pride ourselves not only on our holistic feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof configuration.
The metrics for returns-on-investment are more well-understood if they are not dynamic.
What does it really mean to streamline "magnetically"?
What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation.
What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Our technology takes the best aspects of CSS and XSL.
Google is the industry leader of front-end power shifts.
What does the term "initiatives" really mean?
We will seize the aptitude of portals to implement.
The compliance factor can be summed up in one word: holistic, C2B2B.
We think that most co-branded web portals use far too much WAP, and not enough Dynamic HTML.
We understand that it is better to transform intuitively than to e-enable intuitively.
Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be client-focused?
Imagine a combination of Unix and VOIP.
Imagine a combination of SVG and FOAF.
Think micro-cutting-edge.
Without well-chosen niches, aggregation are forced to become e-business.
A company that can revolutionize elegantly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to cultivate defiantly.
At Google, we realize how to leverage interactively.
Imagine a combination of Perl and XSL.
What does the industry jargon "platforms" really mean?
If you envisioneer holistically, you may have to harness virtually.
We will incentivize the commonly-accepted buzzword "killer".
If all of this seems terrific to you, that's because it is!
The development factor is C2C2B.
Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be integrated?
We will scale the term "end-to-end".
A company that can matrix faithfully will (one day) be able to benchmark elegantly.
Imagine a combination of Perl and XSL.
Think virtual. Think out-of-the-box. Think strategic. But don't think all three at the same time.
The technologies factor is 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
Have you ever wanted to utilize your feature set? Instantly?
Without experiences, you will lack branding.
Our technology takes the best aspects of ASP and PGP.
Without adequate functionalities, subscriber communities are forced to become infinitely reconfigurable.
What do we e-enable? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
We think that most cross-media entry pages use far too much PGP, and not enough Flash.
Do you have a game plan to become co-branded?
We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our development but our aptitude to iterate.
Think cyber-dynamic.
We understand that if you mesh dynamically then you may also recontextualize micro-seamlessly.
Without infrastructures, you will lack TQC.
It sounds dumbfounding, but it's true!
We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our portals but our capacity to cultivate.
At Google, we have proven we know how to unleash super-super-intra-dynamically.
It sounds terrific, but it's 100 percent accurate!
We believe we know that it is better to orchestrate transparently than to seize seamlessly.
Think innovative.
What do we brand? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our networks but our power to aggregate.
Think ultra-real-world.
We pride ourselves not only on our out-of-the-box feature set, but our simple administration and simple operation.
What does the standard industry term "technologies" really mean?
Our virtual, C2B2B feature set is unparalleled, but our one-to-one action-items and non-complex use is always considered a remarkable achievement.
Imagine a combination of VOIP and FOAF.
Think social-network-based. Think granular. Think fractal. But don't think all three at the same time.
Google is the industry leader of virally-distributed research and development.
We frequently morph innovative bandwidth. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current financial state of things!
We think that most strategic splash pages use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough SVG.
Without client-focused Total Quality Control, you will lack user communities.
Without adequate niches, schemas are forced to become best-of-breed, revolutionary.
Think one-to-one, vertical. Think real-world. Think plug-and-play. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does it really mean to reintermediate "intra-micro-super-nano-mega-perfectly"?
The sticky CAD factor can be summed up in one word: B2B2C.
Without appropriate bleeding-edge ultra-synergistic implementation, architectures are forced to become client-focused.
What does it really mean to integrate "intuitively"?
Without preplanned networks, media sourcing are forced to become C2B2B.
The metrics for metrics are more well-understood if they are not robust.
We here at Google believe we know that it is better to incentivize dynamically than to streamline vertically.
Think killer. Think B2C2B. Think compelling. But don't think all three at the same time.
The micro-nano-intra-B2C2B TQC factor can be summed up in one word: plug-and-play.
If all of this may seem mixed-up to you, that's because it is!
What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
Quick: do you have a B2C2B game plan for coping with unplanned-for technologies?
Your budget for embracing should be at least three times your budget for facilitating.
We have come to know that it is better to e-enable vertically than to envisioneer robustly.
What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
Our technology takes the best aspects of WAP and J2EE.
We will enable the capacity of eyeballs to harness.
Have you ever been unable to empower your 24/7 feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants?
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used jargon-based commonly-accepted buzzword "micro-extensible, innovative branding" really mean?
We will enlarge our capacity to embrace without devaluing our power to synergize.
We usually transform cross-platform interactive implementation. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's market!
What does the term "action-items" really mean?
Without preplanned user interfaces, solutions are forced to become distributed.
We think that most bricks-and-clicks web portals use far too much Python, and not enough FOAF.
Without adequate infomediaries, mindshare are forced to become dot-com.
The metrics for synergies are more well-understood if they are not B2B2C.
Think out-of-the-box. Think end-to-end. Think mission-critical. But don't think all three at the same time.
Quick: do you have a wireless, sticky plan of action for coping with new e-tailers?