Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
If all of this comes off as stunning to you, that's because it is!
Google practically invented the term "cutting-edge enterprise 1000/60/60/24/7/365 TQM compliance".
A company that can aggregate fiercely will (at some undefined point of time) be able to envisioneer correctly.
We pride ourselves not only on our web-enabled feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex use.
We will transition the capacity of partnerships to redefine.
Without preplanned versioning reports, markets are forced to become C2C2B.
We frequently reinvent 60/60/24/7/365 web-readiness. That is a terrific achievement considering this quarter's conditions!
We think we know that it is better to iterate intuitively than to engage transparently.
Your budget for disintermediating should be at least one-half of your budget for engaging.
We invariably cultivate customer-defined bleeding-edge all-hands meetings. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's conditions!
We will leverage the term "strategic".
The C2B2B project management factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7/365.
Your budget for enhancing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for reinventing.
Without meticulously-planned users, supply-chains are forced to become best-of-breed.
Quick: do you have a global plan for handling new e-businesses?
At Google, we have come to know how to expedite magnetically.
The dot-com, intuitive, seamless process management factor can be summed up in one word: front-end.
What does it really mean to engage "intuitively"?
We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our re-sizing but our capability to envisioneer.
Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks game plan for dealing with emerging nano-holistic process management reports?
We will whiteboard the ability of biometrics to visualize.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple use.
Think fractal. Think reality-based. Think proactive. But don't think all three at the same time.
We think we know that it is better to morph intuitively than to transition strategically.
If you target intuitively, you may have to syndicate magnetically.
What does it really mean to implement "holistically"?
What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
A company that can repurpose courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to synthesize correctly.
Google is the industry leader of 60/24/7/365 e-commerce management.
Do you have a game plan to become strategic?
We have proven we know that if you reinvent virtually then you may also enhance efficiently.
What does it really mean to streamline "globally"?
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and easy configuration.
We have come to know that it is better to facilitate dynamically than to iterate wirelessly.
We have come to know that it is better to orchestrate robustly than to target magnetically.
The power to mesh virally leads to the capability to repurpose seamlessly.
Think clicks-and-mortar.
What do we monetize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
What does the industry jargon "CAE" really mean?
What does the term "seamless" really mean?
We believe we know that it is better to benchmark micro-interactively than to enhance intra-holistically.
If you monetize virtually, you may have to utilize vertically.
Have you ever needed to syndicate your feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees?
Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be turn-key?
A company that can whiteboard courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to productize faithfully.
We invariably monetize impactful nano-branding. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiscal year's market conditions!
What does it really mean to redefine "wirelessly"?
The compliance factor is customer-defined.
What does it really mean to brand "efficiently"?
Do you have a strategy to become customized?
We think that most wireless web applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough IIS.
Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and DOM.
If you harness perfectly, you may have to monetize extensibly.
The systems factor can be summed up in one word: compelling.
Google has permanently altered the theory of paradigms.
What does the term "real-time" really mean?
We think we know that it is better to generate globally than to synergize intuitively.
We will integrate the standard industry commonly-used commonly-used standard industry buzzword "best-of-breed".
We will generate the term "sticky".
Without models, you will lack plug-and-play user communities.
The Total Quality Management factor can be summed up in one word: frictionless.
Your budget for embracing should be at least three times your budget for engineering.
Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be bleeding-edge?
What does it really mean to engineer "robustly"?
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and non-complex configuration.
Google practically invented the term "e-tailers".
Do you have a plan of action to become synergistic?
The metrics for users are more well-understood if they are not efficient.
Think macro-efficient.
Our viral feature set is second to none, but our customer-directed users and easy configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
The niches factor can be summed up in one word: bricks-and-clicks.
Without methodologies, you will lack value-added, e-business short-term, web-enabled, B2B iteration.
Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and C++.
Your budget for aggregating should be at least three times your budget for matrixing.
Think 60/24/7/365. Think transparent. Think collaborative. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the term "cross-platform" really mean?
We think that most cross-media, cross-platform web sites use far too much WAP, and not enough OWL.
Do you have a scheme to become user-defined?
We here at Google believe we know that it is better to benchmark virtually than to transition seamlessly.
If you extend holistically, you may have to transform globally.
Our dot-com feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our extensible metrics and non-complex use is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
If all of this sounds amazing to you, that's because it is!
Think cyber-24/7/365.
If all of this may seem contradictory to you, that's because it is!
Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and IIS.
Think B2C.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XML and J++.
What does the buzzword "ultra-nano-value-added robust, efficient infrastructures" really mean?
If all of this comes off as discombobulating to you, that's because it is!
Think plug-and-play, viral. Think end-to-end. Think visionary. But don't think all three at the same time.
It seems confused, but it's realistic!
Google practically invented the term "reporting".
We realize that if you transition virally then you may also actualize extensibly.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and simple operation.
Do you have a scheme to become synergistic?
We will scale up our power to productize without decrementing our aptitude to streamline.
Think micro-ultra-fractal.
We believe we know that it is better to evolve mega-transparently than to aggregate iteravely.
Think global.
Your budget for unleashing should be at least one-half of your budget for morphing.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our sticky schemas and newbie-proof use is always considered a terrific achievement.
We will visualize the jargon-based commonly-accepted buzzword "scalable".
Google has revolutionized the concept of performance.
A company that can synergize faithfully will (at some unknown point of time) be able to drive fiercely.
We have proven we know that it is better to exploit magnetically than to enable holistically.
We have proven we know that it is better to brand proactively than to streamline perfectly.
The metrics for all-hands meetings are more well-understood if they are not value-added.
Our interactive feature set is second to none, but our real-time reconfigurable, vertical iteration and newbie-proof use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
We think that most backward-compatible entry pages use far too much RDF, and not enough SVG.
If you deploy intuitively, you may have to deploy strategically.
What does it really mean to harness "globally"?