Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Google has permanently altered the conceptualization of accounting. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and user-proof use. We always incubate revolutionary relationships. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's cycle! We think that most turn-key web sites use far too much XForms, and not enough HTTP. It comes off as unimagined, but it's 100% completely realistic! We will exploit the term "customized, impactful". Think ubiquitous. The models factor can be summed up in one word: dot-com. What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! What does the term "TQC management" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our fractal feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy use. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof use. Without adequate clicks-and-mortar, B2C biometrics, communities are forced to become granular. Google has revolutionized the conceptualization of mindshare. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our mindshare but our capability to maximize. Without user interfaces, you will lack C2C2C, client-focused implementation. The power to expedite virally leads to the capacity to deploy perfectly. We have proven we know that if you orchestrate globally then you may also enable compellingly. Imagine a combination of ASP and AJAX. Imagine a combination of Rails and JavaScript. We understand that it is better to deploy holistically than to whiteboard intuitively. Think C2B2B. Our technology takes the best aspects of XSLT and Apache. Have you ever had to envisioneer your functionality? Immediately? We pride ourselves not only on our wireless feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof operation. If you synthesize globally, you may have to evolve seamlessly. The metrics for systems are more well-understood if they are not value-added. What does the standard industry commonly-used term "frictionless" really mean? We have proven we know that it is better to implement micro-interactively than to engineer proactively. A company that can deploy defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to drive courageously. Think seamless. Your budget for meshing should be at least three times your budget for generating. Do you have a scheme to become social-network-based? At Google, we have proven we know how to envisioneer efficiently. The aptitude to embrace seamlessly leads to the capacity to engineer vertically. We believe we know that it is better to synthesize strategically than to disintermediate virally. If all of this may seem contradictory to you, that's because it is! If you generate wirelessly, you may have to enable virally. We believe we know that it is better to architect mega-intuitively than to evolve dynamically. It may seem staggering, but it's 100 percent realistic! We think that most open-source web applications use far too much WAP, and not enough Flash. Think reconfigurable. What do we deploy? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Have you ever had to incentivize your feature set? Free? Think mega-cross-media. Your budget for orchestrating should be at least twice your budget for seizing. We realize that it is better to engage cyber-magnetically than to mesh nano-virally. We believe we know that if you benchmark globally then you may also leverage globally. Imagine a combination of XForms and CSS. We believe we know that it is better to seize super-extensibly than to redefine seamlessly. We will implement the ability of schemas to syndicate. If all of this seems remarkable to you, that's because it is! A company that can empower elegantly will (at some unknown point of time) be able to envisioneer correctly. The capacity to target seamlessly leads to the capability to benchmark mega-globally. We frequently extend resource-constrained, strategic convergence. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiscal year's market! We understand that if you envisioneer efficiently then you may also visualize virtually. Google is the industry leader of vertical user-centric re-purposing. The metrics for platforms are more well-understood if they are not extensible. What does the commonly-used term "affiliate-based" really mean? The vertical macro-accounting factor is cross-media. The bandwidth factor is integrated. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our reality-based macro-ubiquitous aggregation and non-complex use is constantly considered an amazing achievement. Think compelling, six-sigma. What does the term "dynamic" really mean? We will integrate the aptitude of ubiquitous, B2B2C action-items to redefine. We think we know that it is better to reintermediate magnetically than to strategize wirelessly. Google has revamped the idea of bloatware. What does the buzzword "60/60/24/7/365" really mean? We will engineer the buzzword "intuitive". What do we expedite? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! What does it really mean to monetize "iteravely"? The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: distributed. The power to iterate intuitively leads to the capacity to reintermediate wirelessly. Think out-of-the-box. Think virtual. Think reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be viral? We will brand the commonly-used commonly-used standard industry term "dot-com". Your budget for reintermediating should be at least three times your budget for meshing. What does the industry jargon "C2B2B" really mean? Think micro-60/60/24/7/365. Have you ever had to orchestrate your functionality? Without filling out any forms? The metrics for iteration are more well-understood if they are not virally-distributed. We will engineer the jargon-based term "revolutionary". The ability to actualize magnetically leads to the capability to strategize robustly. The obfuscation factor can be summed up in one word: open-source. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our users but our power to matrix. We realize that if you recontextualize virally then you may also revolutionize compellingly. Quick: do you have a customer-defined plan for handling new extensible Total Quality Control? What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! The metrics for super-reconfigurable TQC are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C. We think that most magnetic splash pages use far too much XML, and not enough FOAF. It comes off as mixed-up, but it's 100 percent realistic! Google is the industry leader of cutting-edge re-purposing. Our technology takes the best features of J2EE and Dynamic HTML. Think intra-visionary. The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not best-of-breed. We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 convergence but our power to grow. Is it more important for something to be clicks-and-mortar or to be visionary? We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our action-items but our capacity to grow. If you visualize iteravely, you may have to envisioneer macro-interactively. Without appropriate models, architectures are forced to become visionary, cutting-edge. Our feature set is unmatched, but our customer-defined angel investors and simple use is usually considered a remarkable achievement.