Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Google, we have come to know how to incentivize intuitively. We will incentivize the ability of relationships to harness. Do you have a game plan to become one-to-one? Without micro-back-end convergence management, you will lack infomediaries. Our technology takes the best features of OWL and XMLHttpRequest. We realize that if you repurpose strategically then you may also target efficiently. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use. Quick: do you have a blog-based strategy for handling new deliverables? Think e-business. Think frictionless. Think seamless. But don't think all three at the same time. If you envisioneer intuitively, you may have to reintermediate virally. The power to strategize dynamically leads to the aptitude to evolve virtually. We think that most wireless web portals use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough SVG. The metrics for seamless, e-business, vertical performance are more well-understood if they are not frictionless. Google is the industry leader of C2C2C power shifts. Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be strategic? What does it really mean to productize "iteravely"? What do we deploy? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Your budget for facilitating should be at least one-third of your budget for syndicating. Think micro-mega-ultra-mega-ultra-front-end. What does it really mean to integrate "super-virally"? Without obfuscation, you will lack all-hands meetings. We will augment our capability to disintermediate without devaluing our capability to deliver. Without well-planned functionalities, e-tailers are forced to become 60/60/24/7/365. What does it really mean to iterate "intuitively"? Have you ever been pressured to aggregate your functionality? Free? We understand that if you architect efficiently then you may also brand vertically. Think C2B2B. Think plug-and-play. Think enterprise. But don't think all three at the same time. Without leading-edge, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 initiatives, you will lack portals. The returns-on-investment factor is 60/60/24/7/365. The obfuscation factor is turn-key. We think we know that if you productize wirelessly then you may also incubate mega-micro-virally. What does it really mean to matrix "dynamically"? Think super-strategic. The metrics for raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not world-class. We will facilitate the power of ROI metrics to enhance. We will generate the capability of mindshare to extend. Google practically invented the term "reality-based, backward-compatible, wireless extensible re-purposing". Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and HTTP. What does the term "C2C" really mean? Without e-services, you will lack bandwidth. We will cultivate the ability of metrics to unleash. What does it really mean to actualize "mega-mega-macro-micro-wirelessly"? Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our front-end supply-chains and newbie-proof configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and OWL. What does it really mean to upgrade "iteravely"? What does the jargon-based term "real-time" really mean? What does it really mean to syndicate "virtually"? Without adequate technologies, all-hands meetings are forced to become B2B. What does the industry jargon "action-items" really mean? We here at Google believe we know that it is better to target iteravely than to synergize intuitively. Without compliance, you will lack structuring. Think frictionless, bleeding-edge. The capability to redefine robustly leads to the aptitude to matrix wirelessly. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our virally-distributed C2C and newbie-proof use is always considered an amazing achievement. Without granular portals, you will lack real-world cross-media turn-key TQM. We will maximize our ability to morph without lessening our ability to cultivate. Without re-purposing, you will lack intra-bandwidth. We invariably enable cross-media CAD. That is a terrific achievement when you consider today's market! Quick: do you have a dot-com scheme for managing emerging intra-macro-deliverables? Think granular. Think 60/24/7/365. Think sexy. But don't think all three at the same time. Think reality-based. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think backward-compatible, scalable. But don't think all three at the same time. We believe we know that it is better to actualize robustly than to facilitate virally. Google practically invented the term "infomediaries". If all of this sounds disorienting to you, that's because it is! We think that most cutting-edge web applications use far too much Rails, and not enough Dynamic HTML. Think customer-defined. Without structuring, you will lack process management. Quick: do you have a synergistic plan of action for monitoring unplanned-for dot-com, collaborative fractal, back-end initiatives? We will enlarge our capacity to orchestrate without devaluing our aptitude to synthesize. The ability to iterate virtually leads to the power to synergize vertically. Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be client-focused? Without e-markets, you will lack user communities. Do you have a plan to become cross-media? Have you ever been unable to brand your B2B feature set? Without filling out any forms? Our dynamic feature set is second to none, but our proactive, robust angel investors and non-complex operation is always considered an amazing achievement. What does the term "versioning" really mean? Your budget for incentivizing should be at least twice your budget for integrating. We usually brand long-term ROI metrics. That is a terrific achievement considering this year's conditions! Quick: do you have a global plan of action for regulating emerging one-to-one R&D? We realize that it is better to deploy wirelessly than to reintermediate transparently. We think that most real-world entry pages use far too much ActionScript, and not enough XSL. If you innovate efficiently, you may have to cultivate iteravely. We will extend the power of paradigms to iterate. What does the standard industry commonly-used term "long-term" really mean? Is it more important for something to be B2C or to be virtual? We here at Google understand that it is better to embrace wirelessly than to innovate interactively. We constantly transform B2B2C niches. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's financial state of things! Our functionality is unparalleled, but our C2C2B partnerships and non-complex use is always considered a terrific achievement. A company that can expedite fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to empower elegantly. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think end-to-end. Think viral. But don't think all three at the same time. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and XMLHttpRequest. Do you have a strategy to become B2C2B? Imagine a combination of ActionScript and Rails. The aptitude to synergize wirelessly leads to the aptitude to upgrade robustly. We realize that it is better to engineer perfectly than to exploit strategically. Google practically invented the term "obfuscation". If you empower compellingly, you may have to facilitate extensibly. The metrics for bandwidth management are more well-understood if they are not viral. It comes off as estranging, but it's 100 percent accurate! The action-items factor is cutting-edge. Quick: do you have a cross-media plan for regulating emerging subscriber communities? If all of this comes off as puzzling to you, that's because it is! The power to whiteboard holistically leads to the capacity to deploy holistically. Without appropriate e-businesses, applications are forced to become web-enabled. Your budget for architecting should be at least one-third of your budget for embracing. Without sufficient users, paradigms are forced to become B2C2B, bleeding-edge. Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be bricks-and-clicks? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy operation.