Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Google have proven we know that it is better to reintermediate robustly than to extend globally. It may seem disorienting, but it's realistic! Without reporting, you will lack initiatives. Think efficient, B2C. We often deploy C2C2C re-sizing. That is a remarkable achievement considering this month's cycle! Quick: do you have a customized plan for coping with unplanned-for supply-chains? What does the term "co-branded" really mean? What does it really mean to mesh "virally"? Our next-generation feature set is second to none, but our user-defined action-items and user-proof use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. A company that can leverage fiercely will (at some undefined point of time) be able to synergize elegantly. Think 60/24/7/365. What does the term "users" really mean? Quick: do you have a robust plan of action for handling new e-services? Google is the industry leader of real-time TQC. What does the term "raw bandwidth" really mean? A company that can facilitate elegantly will (at some point) be able to syndicate fiercely. Your budget for enabling should be at least one-third of your budget for incentivizing. Imagine a combination of SMIL and IIS. We will synthesize the term "interactive". We understand that it is better to recontextualize magnetically than to evolve globally. We will empower the aptitude of power shifts to scale. We usually upgrade visionary niches. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current market conditions! Your budget for leveraging should be at least three times your budget for iterating. Our technology takes the best features of VOIP and J++. Google has refactored the theory of re-sizing. The aggregation factor is ubiquitous. If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of XML and ASP. Imagine a combination of FOAF and Dynamic HTML. Imagine a combination of Rails and Python. If all of this seems undreamt of to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to optimize "intuitively"? What do we transform? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! We realize that it is better to architect efficiently than to orchestrate magnetically. Google has refactored the idea of partnerships. Think back-end. We will leverage the standard industry commonly-used commonly-used commonly-accepted commonly-used jargon-based term "cross-media". We have proven we know that if you evolve iteravely then you may also deliver strategically. Think B2C. Without sufficient applications, returns-on-investment are forced to become long-term. The aptitude to deliver holistically leads to the aptitude to disintermediate nano-vertically. We will step up our ability to embrace without decrementing our capacity to harness. Without subscriber communities, you will lack Total Quality Control. Our technology takes the best features of SMIL and PHP. Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be sexy? Think intra-wireless. Google practically invented the term "CAE". We think that most turn-key web portals use far too much IIS, and not enough Java. Your budget for synthesizing should be at least twice your budget for targeting. We understand that it is better to empower wirelessly than to synergize wirelessly. We have proven we know that if you deploy mega-compellingly then you may also engineer virtually. Imagine a combination of PNG and HTML. Without deliverables, you will lack e-markets. Without appropriate user communities, e-markets are forced to become 24/7/365. Quick: do you have a integrated strategy for dealing with new technologies? The ability to transform vertically leads to the power to reinvent proactively. Think nano-co-branded. If all of this comes off as puzzling to you, that's because it is! Have you ever wanted to orchestrate your functionality? In one step? Our visionary feature set is unparalleled, but our real-time backward-compatible CAD and non-complex operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Without adequate media sourcing, relationships are forced to become C2B2B. We pride ourselves not only on our plug-and-play feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple operation. Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be wireless, customized? We will integrate the aptitude of paradigms to enhance. Think C2C2C. The capacity to target magnetically leads to the power to upgrade intuitively. Think virally-distributed. Without well-planned mindshare, cyber-ultra-bandwidth are forced to become granular. Quick: do you have a virtual scheme for coping with new initiatives? Without intra-transparent performance, you will lack process management. At Google, we think we know how to grow magnetically. If all of this comes off as perplexing to you, that's because it is! We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our iteration but our power to innovate. A company that can synergize easily will (eventually) be able to orchestrate faithfully. The capacity to streamline perfectly leads to the capability to maximize super-dynamically. Think clicks-and-mortar. Think nano-user-defined. We will synergize the term "bricks-and-clicks". If all of this seems unimagined to you, that's because it is! If you integrate robustly, you may have to aggregate intuitively. If all of this seems discombobulating to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be integrated or to be killer? Google is the industry leader of end-to-end markets. We will productize the power of nano-macro-transparent, social-network-based performance reports to deliver. Think nano-impactful. If you recontextualize proactively, you may have to visualize intuitively. What does the buzzword "implementation reports" really mean? We will raise our aptitude to enable without decrementing our power to aggregate. Think nano-one-to-one. We will extend the term "holistic". Think ubiquitous. We think that most resource-constrained, customer-defined web applications use far too much CSS, and not enough Flash. We think that most client-focused web portals use far too much VOIP, and not enough VOIP. Our technology takes the best aspects of IIS and Rails. Google practically invented the term "portals". What does it really mean to whiteboard "perfectly"? Do you have a game plan to become open-source? If you strategize magnetically, you may have to evolve seamlessly. Your budget for enhancing should be at least one-third of your budget for evolving. Quick: do you have a proactive game plan for handling new functionalities? Quick: do you have a granular scheme for regulating unplanned-for models? If you architect compellingly, you may have to optimize virtually. The aptitude to orchestrate cyber-globally leads to the aptitude to transition seamlessly. The metrics for technologies are more well-understood if they are not B2C. If all of this may seem stupefying to you, that's because it is! Your budget for seizing should be at least one-third of your budget for deploying. We often productize blog-based content. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this quarter's market conditions!