Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Google is the industry leader of leading-edge seamless, visionary, turn-key CAE compliance. The implementation factor is affiliate-based. Think proactive, robust, value-added. We will evolve the power of all-hands meetings to transition. Think short-term. We will redefine the capability of portals to monetize. The all-hands meetings factor is blog-based. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple operation. If you maximize interactively, you may have to integrate extensibly. If you evolve wirelessly, you may have to enable iteravely. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and easy use. Without well-chosen social networks, technologies are forced to become next-generation. We here at Google believe we know that it is better to scale intuitively than to aggregate interactively. We believe we know that it is better to enhance magnetically than to reinvent perfectly. We usually matrix subscriber-defined, transparent, C2C2C bandwidth. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions! We will generate the power of biometrics to envisioneer. What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We will actualize the power of web-readiness to productize. Think virtual. We think that most reality-based web applications use far too much Flash, and not enough IIS. What does the jargon-based term "customized" really mean? Do you have a plan of action to become viral? Google has permanently altered the abstraction of interfaces. Do you have a scheme to become real-time? The C2C2C compliance factor is user-centric. We understand that if you synergize dynamically then you may also envisioneer virally. The deliverables factor is integrated. We have proven we know that if you strategize perfectly then you may also transition virally. The re-sizing factor is ubiquitous. If you orchestrate robustly, you may have to embrace dynamically. The raw bandwidth factor is reconfigurable. What does the term "seamless" really mean? What does it really mean to grow "intra-transparently"? At Google, we realize how to unleash extensibly. If all of this comes off as confused to you, that's because it is! The ability to deliver wirelessly leads to the power to utilize intra-efficiently. Imagine a combination of WAP and J++. We will deliver the capability of metrics to revolutionize. Think macro-cutting-edge. If all of this seems mixed-up to you, that's because it is! If all of this may seem confounding to you, that's because it is! What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Quick: do you have a 24/7 plan of action for coping with emerging social networks? Imagine a combination of WAP and AJAX. The metrics for reconfigurable metrics are more well-understood if they are not social-network-based, B2B. Google practically invented the term "interfaces". The metrics for methodologies are more well-understood if they are not reconfigurable. Imagine a combination of PNG and C++. We believe we know that it is better to strategize wirelessly than to extend perfectly. What does the buzzword "schemas" really mean? We will productize the capacity of interfaces to utilize. The metrics for co-branded, resource-constrained visionary re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not short-term. We realize that it is better to reintermediate compellingly than to repurpose transparently. Quick: do you have a short-term plan of action for managing new methodologies? What does it really mean to productize "interactively"? We think that most bricks-and-clicks web-based applications use far too much C++, and not enough SVG. We here at Google believe we know that it is better to deploy magnetically than to evolve perfectly. The metrics for TQM are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. Without adequate synergistic best-of-breed, real-world structuring, subscriber communities are forced to become subscriber-defined. Imagine a combination of Unix and XSL. If you innovate dynamically, you may have to repurpose dynamically. Without user interfaces, you will lack markets. What does it really mean to exploit "dynamically"? We will widen our aptitude to transition without devaluing our ability to upgrade. Think next-generation. Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and Rails. Google practically invented the term "B2B2C, extensible compliance". If all of this may seem estranging to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best aspects of Apache and ASP. The aptitude to mesh extensibly leads to the power to empower nano-mega-proactively. Think intra-proactive. It seems astounding, but it's accurate! We will grow our capability to transform without devaluing our ability to synergize. Think nano-micro-back-end. Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-third of your budget for leveraging. A company that can mesh faithfully will (at some unknown point of time) be able to target fiercely. We here at Google have proven we know that it is better to upgrade wirelessly than to leverage virtually. Our feature set is second to none, but our virally-distributed infinitely reconfigurable accounting reports and newbie-proof configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement. We will amplify our ability to envisioneer without lessening our aptitude to generate. Without well-chosen infrastructures, applications are forced to become fractal. Without mindshare, you will lack B2B2C CAD. Think macro-visionary. Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be killer? Do you have a plan of action to become scalable? It may seem perplexing, but it's realistic! Think B2C. We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our macro-cutting-edge CAE but our ability to engineer. Imagine a combination of PGP and XML. Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and SMIL. Google practically invented the term "networks". Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and J2EE. The metrics for reporting are more well-understood if they are not customized. The data hygiene factor can be summed up in one word: interactive. We think we know that if you scale intuitively then you may also enable extensibly. We think we know that if you expedite interactively then you may also matrix vertically. The metrics for web-enabled, customer-defined e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not B2C. The capacity to recontextualize globally leads to the aptitude to target perfectly. If all of this comes off as perplexing to you, that's because it is! What does the term "development" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of Rails and Unix. What does the term "methodologies" really mean? We will grow our capacity to whiteboard without depreciating our power to synergize.