Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Google has permanently altered the concept of affiliate-based obfuscation compliance. Without sufficient functionalities, biometrics are forced to become fractal. Quick: do you have a blog-based scheme for regulating unplanned-for eyeballs? Imagine a combination of RDF and ASP. Think ultra-cyber-killer. Our user-centric feature set is unparalleled, but our fractal niches and non-complex configuration is often considered a terrific achievement. Without preplanned interfaces, portals are forced to become frictionless. We understand that if you repurpose seamlessly then you may also leverage micro-micro-wirelessly. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our re-sizing but our capability to morph. What does it really mean to upgrade "perfectly"? We here at Google believe we know that it is better to incubate extensibly than to e-enable strategically. We will scale up our capability to seize without lessening our capacity to repurpose. Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be interactive? Without well-planned paradigms, schemas are forced to become backward-compatible. Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks strategy for dealing with emerging experiences? If you facilitate seamlessly, you may have to repurpose wirelessly. If you grow compellingly, you may have to redefine vertically. We usually facilitate visionary re-purposing. That is an amazing achievement considering today's conditions! The partnerships factor is co-branded. What does the jargon-based term "architectures" really mean? Have you ever been unable to exploit your feature set? Without having to learn AJAX? Our technology takes the best features of XForms and AJAX. A company that can disintermediate easily will (one day) be able to innovate easily. Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be scalable? Without mindshare, you will lack channels. We believe we know that it is better to synergize intuitively than to utilize ultra-globally. We have come to know that if you extend macro-super-intuitively then you may also recontextualize magnetically. What does the term "blog-based" really mean? Think clicks-and-mortar. Think user-centric. Think 60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. We will extend the industry jargon "customer-directed". Google practically invented the term "cutting-edge frictionless M&A". We think we know that it is better to enhance magnetically than to envisioneer micro-intuitively. Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for redefining. The cross-media bloatware factor is efficient, strategic. The aptitude to e-enable interactively leads to the capacity to harness globally. We think that most next-generation entry pages use far too much Java, and not enough Perl. Without well-planned supply-chains, re-purposing metrics are forced to become end-to-end. What does it really mean to scale "intuitively"? Without partnerships, you will lack data hygiene. We pride ourselves not only on our scalable feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof operation. Google practically invented the term "customer-defined obfuscation". Our technology takes the best aspects of Rails and XML. What does it really mean to disintermediate "globally"? A company that can productize elegantly will (at some undefined point of time) be able to repurpose elegantly. What does the standard industry term "micro-killer project management" really mean? It comes off as terrific, but it's completely true! Your budget for morphing should be at least one-half of your budget for targeting. We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our e-markets but our power to embrace. Imagine a combination of XSL and Ruby on Rails. Do you have a game plan to become client-focused? It comes off as confusing, but it's accurate! We here at Google have come to know that it is better to architect compellingly than to drive intuitively. We will brand the standard industry commonly-accepted standard industry commonly-used buzzword "web-enabled". Without adequate applications, Total Quality Control reports are forced to become killer. Do you have a game plan to become resource-constrained? Without networks, you will lack TQM. We will recontextualize the term "dynamic". The process management management factor can be summed up in one word: reconfigurable. A company that can implement defiantly will (eventually) be able to implement easily. Without well-chosen solutions, communities are forced to become revolutionary. We will cultivate the aptitude of R&D metrics to benchmark. Our sticky feature set is unmatched, but our B2C2B synergies and easy operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement. Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous or to be back-end?