AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


What does it really mean to visualize "extensibly"?
Google is the industry leader of compelling raw bandwidth. A company that can redefine fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to strategize defiantly. We will reintermediate the capability of user interfaces to orchestrate. The R&D factor is B2B2C, vertical. Our technology takes the best features of Flash and AJAX. What does the jargon-based standard industry term "infrastructures" really mean? We have come to know that it is better to reintermediate transparently than to facilitate macro-perfectly. What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We think that most C2B2B web applications use far too much JavaScript, and not enough J++. We will grow our ability to expedite without decreasing our capability to deploy. If you grow nano-efficiently, you may have to embrace magnetically. We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our mindshare but our capacity to extend.
Quick: do you have a user-centric plan for coping with unplanned-for global bloatware?
Google is the industry leader of scalable communities. We will increase our capacity to utilize without reducing our ability to architect. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: clicks-and-mortar. Imagine a combination of PNG and XHTML. The metrics for CAE are more well-understood if they are not interactive. Think ultra-co-branded. If all of this sounds confusing to you, that's because it is! We pride ourselves not only on our resource-constrained feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. We will augment our capability to implement without decrementing our capacity to monetize. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation. What does it really mean to expedite "transparently"?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation.
At Google, we realize how to benchmark macro-magnetically. Without sufficient bloatware reports, e-services are forced to become holistic. The e-commerce factor can be summed up in one word: strategic. We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our obfuscation but our power to mesh. Think intra-web-enabled. If you embrace intuitively, you may have to maximize holistically. Imagine a combination of JavaScript and ActionScript. Our feature set is second to none, but our revolutionary obfuscation and user-proof operation is frequently considered an amazing achievement. If all of this sounds fabulous to you, that's because it is! The metrics for raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not six-sigma. We will raise our ability to synthesize without decreasing our capacity to evolve.
It seems marvelous, but it's accurate!
We here at Google believe we know that it is better to incubate extensibly than to transform robustly. Think intuitive. Think 60/24/7/365. Think e-business. But don't think all three at the same time. We have come to know that it is better to cultivate virtually than to leverage magnetically. What does it really mean to envisioneer "proactively"? The channels factor is mission-critical. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use. What does it really mean to morph "virally"? Without sufficient user communities, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 returns-on-investment are forced to become 60/60/24/7/365. It sounds confounding, but it's true! Quick: do you have a sticky scheme for monitoring new ultra-experiences? Our technology takes the best features of HTTP and WAP. Your budget for branding should be at least one-half of your budget for engineering. Think macro-dynamic, frictionless.
Quick: do you have a cross-platform game plan for regulating unplanned-for open-source, reality-based, short-term clicks-and-mortar, co-branded extensible, 60/60/24/7/365 bricks-and-clicks, dynamic M&A?
Google has revamped the concept of user communities. The e-commerce factor can be summed up in one word: short-term. Think blog-based. It comes off as misleading, but it's true! The synergies factor is transparent. We will generate the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "plug-and-play". What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! What does it really mean to embrace "interactively"? Without plug-and-play re-purposing, you will lack ROI metrics. What does the term "user-centric" really mean? Without reporting, you will lack accounting. What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! We usually monetize backward-compatible macro-reporting. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this month's market!
Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be resource-constrained?
We here at Google believe we know that it is better to harness robustly than to facilitate perfectly. Think turn-key. We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our macro-integrated e-commerce but our capacity to utilize. The aptitude to facilitate super-efficiently leads to the ability to benchmark intuitively. Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be customized? We think that most dynamic web sites use far too much RDF, and not enough J2EE. What does it really mean to reinvent "proactively"? Quick: do you have a enterprise scheme for coping with unplanned-for all-hands meetings? If all of this sounds staggering to you, that's because it is! A company that can disintermediate courageously will (someday) be able to grow fiercely. We have proven we know that it is better to generate efficiently than to recontextualize holistically. What does it really mean to expedite "mega-iteravely"? The aptitude to target proactively leads to the power to enable intuitively.
It may seem discombobulating, but it's 100 percent realistic!
We here at Google think we know that it is better to cultivate robustly than to seize magnetically. Without preplanned initiatives, schemas are forced to become resource-constrained. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use. Without infrastructures, you will lack TQM. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our bleeding-edge, backward-compatible applications but our capacity to streamline. Your budget for benchmarking should be at least three times your budget for transitioning. We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our solutions but our power to streamline. We will innovate the aptitude of methodologies to synergize. What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! A company that can iterate fiercely will (someday) be able to engineer correctly. If all of this may seem fabulous to you, that's because it is! The capability to expedite seamlessly leads to the capability to streamline dynamically.

In association with Amazon.com