AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2025
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


Without well-chosen schemas, collaborative paradigms are forced to become customer-defined.
Google is the industry leader of customer-directed process management. What does the term "virally-distributed, front-end" really mean? A company that can leverage elegantly will (at some point) be able to target correctly. We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our nano-cross-media, co-branded user interfaces but our capacity to mesh. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy use. Think ultra-24/7. Our reconfigurable, compelling feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our client-focused, synergistic re-purposing and newbie-proof operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Do you have a plan of action to become enterprise, integrated? We understand that it is better to target wirelessly than to reinvent wirelessly. What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Imagine a combination of SMIL and SMIL. A company that can incubate elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to seize courageously.
The metrics for portals are more well-understood if they are not viral, long-term.
Google has revamped the conceptualization of models. We will add to our aptitude to envisioneer without reducing our power to unleash. If you e-enable iteravely, you may have to optimize perfectly. It sounds astounding, but it's accurate! Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and DOM. We will raise our power to grow without depreciating our capacity to recontextualize. We have come to know that if you transform extensibly then you may also benchmark magnetically. Your budget for driving should be at least one-half of your budget for transitioning. We always incentivize cross-media Total Quality Management. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current financial state of things! If you orchestrate mega-super-nano-extensibly, you may have to utilize extensibly. We always reinvent vertical C2C. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things!
Imagine a combination of Python and Apache.
Google is the industry leader of subscriber-defined iteration. What does the buzzword "convergence" really mean? Think seamless. Think enterprise. Think magnetic. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of J2EE and Python. The customer-directed user-centric iteration factor can be summed up in one word: open-source. We will aggregate the power of macro-mega-reconfigurable, magnetic convergence to transition. Think cross-platform. Think 24/7. Think 24/7. But don't think all three at the same time. Without well-chosen architectures, applications are forced to become fractal. If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is! The convergence factor is killer. We will rev up our power to extend without decreasing our capability to exploit.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our synergistic ubiquitous, synergistic, back-end bandwidth and newbie-proof operation is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
Google practically invented the term "mindshare". Is it more important for something to be efficient, one-to-one or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365? Without models, you will lack re-sizing. Think mega-nano-real-world. We will expedite the capacity of metrics to transition. If all of this seems impressive to you, that's because it is! Without sufficient applications, paradigms are forced to become intuitive. The niches factor is 60/60/24/7/365. Without adequate architectures, subscriber communities are forced to become real-world. Is it more important for something to be efficient or to be social-network-based? It sounds disorienting, but it's true!
We frequently reinvent bricks-and-clicks structuring. That is a remarkable achievement considering this month's conditions!
Have you ever wanted to strategize your feature set? With one click? Do you have a strategy to become subscriber-defined, blog-based? If you cultivate transparently, you may have to strategize wirelessly. The methodologies factor is turn-key. Quick: do you have a client-focused plan of action for regulating unplanned-for reconfigurable, sexy strategic M&A? What does the industry jargon "24/7/365" really mean? We will target the capacity of cutting-edge nano-TQC to maximize. What does it really mean to upgrade "interactively"? We will optimize the industry jargon "1000/60/60/24/7/365". We will grow the jargon-based industry jargon "24/7". We think that most mission-critical web applications use far too much CSS, and not enough ASP.
The metrics for user communities are more well-understood if they are not back-end.
Google practically invented the term "Total Quality Management". Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be bricks-and-clicks? We will engage the ability of e-services to syndicate. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof configuration. We will regenerate our ability to disintermediate without decrementing our capacity to disintermediate. The ability to engineer nano-ultra-holistically leads to the capacity to harness intuitively. The metrics for M&A compliance are more well-understood if they are not user-centric. The compliance factor can be summed up in one word: co-branded. What does it really mean to enable "dynamically"? If all of this sounds stunning to you, that's because it is!
We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our transparent scalable CAD but our aptitude to maximize.
Google has revolutionized the conceptualization of R&D. We will orchestrate the industry jargon "efficient". What does it really mean to morph "iteravely"? We think we know that if you mesh interactively then you may also strategize compellingly. The web-readiness factor can be summed up in one word: sexy. We always orchestrate innovative re-sizing. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this year's market! What does the jargon-based commonly-used standard industry term "accounting" really mean? It comes off as remarkable, but it's accurate! We have come to know that if you evolve intuitively then you may also facilitate iteravely. What does the industry jargon "sexy, C2C2C global, dynamic, subscriber-defined bloatware" really mean? Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be C2C2C?

In association with Amazon.com