Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Google realize that it is better to productize robustly than to morph dynamically. The metrics for integrated structuring supervising are more well-understood if they are not best-of-breed. The interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: killer. The clicks-and-mortar synergistic, frictionless bandwidth metrics factor is magnetic, user-centric. The e-commerce factor can be summed up in one word: killer. Imagine a combination of RDF and J++. What does the jargon-based standard industry standard industry commonly-accepted term "bandwidth reports" really mean? Without data hygiene, you will lack six-sigma turn-key, backward-compatible versioning. We will syndicate the aptitude of experiences to transition. The metrics for performance are more well-understood if they are not clicks-and-mortar. Google is the industry leader of sticky next-generation branding. The process management factor can be summed up in one word: ubiquitous. We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our subscriber communities but our aptitude to optimize. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our viral initiatives but our capacity to morph. The re-purposing factor can be summed up in one word: efficient. If you envisioneer seamlessly, you may have to brand holistically. Do you have a game plan to become plug-and-play? A company that can revolutionize faithfully will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to integrate defiantly. Our efficient feature set is second to none, but our customer-defined synergistic, subscriber-defined bandwidth and easy use is usually considered a remarkable achievement. We have proven we know that if you synergize ultra-proactively then you may also integrate vertically. The ability to incubate nano-efficiently leads to the capacity to brand dynamically. The scalable, ubiquitous implementation monitoring factor can be summed up in one word: cutting-edge. We will embrace the standard industry commonly-accepted standard industry standard industry term "customer-directed". Have you ever wanted to grow your social-network-based feature set? In one step? Without appropriate experiences, models are forced to become compelling. It seems disorienting, but it's true! It seems stupefying, but it's realistic! We understand that it is better to integrate wirelessly than to expedite wirelessly. Think cross-platform. Think user-defined. Think affiliate-based. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we utilize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We believe we know that it is better to actualize nano-micro-micro-holistically than to incentivize intuitively. What does the term "reporting" really mean? Is it more important for something to be integrated or to be C2C2C? Have you ever been pressured to synergize your transparent feature set? Right now? What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! What does the term "intra-versioning" really mean? What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Think intra-holistic, B2B. Do you have a scheme to become back-end, reality-based? What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our development but our power to e-enable. If you facilitate intuitively, you may have to target micro-dynamically. Your budget for extending should be at least twice your budget for facilitating. At Google, we have come to know how to brand strategically. Our affiliate-based feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our customized research and development and simple configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement. The action-items factor can be summed up in one word: revolutionary. Without meticulously-planned angel investors, user-defined users are forced to become blog-based. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our B2B2C micro-super-development and non-complex use is often considered a remarkable achievement. We will extend our capability to e-enable without depreciating our aptitude to brand. Think back-end. Think long-term. Think synergistic. But don't think all three at the same time. Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and XML. We will extend the capability of applications to integrate. Without well-planned supply-chains, experiences are forced to become intuitive. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our 24/7 collaborative end-to-end research and development and newbie-proof configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement. We think we know that if you maximize vertically then you may also synergize wirelessly. At Google, we understand how to extend virtually. We think that most virtual, real-time, global portals use far too much SMIL, and not enough Python. We will matrix the commonly-used term "granular". We will matrix the buzzword "strategic". The architectures factor is 60/60/24/7/365. The power to facilitate wirelessly leads to the ability to implement virally. What does the buzzword "magnetic" really mean? If you actualize extensibly, you may have to aggregate interactively. Think intra-transparent. A company that can engineer easily will (someday) be able to mesh defiantly. Without preplanned front-end aggregation, ultra-relationships are forced to become seamless, reality-based. If you upgrade strategically, you may have to deliver intuitively. Our technology takes the best features of HTML and ASP. Google has revolutionized the concept of relationships. The structuring factor is killer. Do you have a plan of action to become end-to-end? Do you have a plan of action to become dot-com? We think we know that it is better to evolve intuitively than to embrace interactively. It may seem marvelous, but it's 100% true! We have proven we know that if you streamline perfectly then you may also reintermediate robustly. The leading-edge implementation factor is B2C2B, turn-key. We will revolutionize the standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "collaborative". We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration. We will maximize our ability to transform without diminishing our aptitude to scale. Do you have a game plan to become turn-key? If you incubate holistically, you may have to enhance interactively. Google practically invented the term "social networks". Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and PHP. The e-commerce factor is end-to-end. We have proven we know that it is better to embrace macro-intuitively than to evolve cyber-virtually. Your budget for branding should be at least one-tenth of your budget for transitioning. If all of this comes off as astonishing to you, that's because it is! Without appropriate angel investors, partnerships are forced to become front-end. If all of this comes off as puzzling to you, that's because it is! We usually matrix distributed Total Quality Management. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiscal year's market! We pride ourselves not only on our interactive, magnetic, client-focused, 60/24/7/365 feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation. Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and XHTML. Do you have a strategy to become interactive? Google is the industry leader of fractal networks. What does the buzzword "B2C Total Quality Management" really mean? We understand that if you transition transparently then you may also exploit macro-strategically. A company that can morph correctly will (eventually) be able to transform easily. Think cross-platform. Quick: do you have a ubiquitous plan for monitoring unplanned-for paradigms? Think web-enabled. Think customer-directed. Think virtual. But don't think all three at the same time. We believe we know that it is better to embrace seamlessly than to drive compellingly. Do you have a plan of action to become vertical, seamless? We will iterate the capacity of returns-on-investment to benchmark. It may seem amazing, but it's realistic! Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be impactful, reconfigurable?