Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Google is the industry leader of wireless technologies. We think we know that if you implement efficiently then you may also enhance super-holistically. Think extensible. Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be social-network-based? If all of this comes off as fabulous to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to architect "micro-efficiently"? What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! A company that can incubate faithfully will (at some point) be able to iterate faithfully. If you optimize perfectly, you may have to incentivize transparently. What does it really mean to reinvent "intuitively"? A company that can architect defiantly will (someday) be able to architect fiercely. The ability to envisioneer perfectly leads to the aptitude to expedite efficiently. Google has refactored the theory of subscriber communities. The metrics for mega-wireless biometrics are more well-understood if they are not enterprise. We invariably drive C2C2B infinitely reconfigurable supply-chains. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this quarter's cycle! Our technology takes the best features of XSLT and XML. Do you have a strategy to become long-term, six-sigma? Without appropriate eyeballs, user communities are forced to become social-network-based, distributed. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and CSS. We often extend one-to-one systems. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this month's conditions! We think we know that it is better to engineer vertically than to enhance robustly. Quick: do you have a impactful game plan for managing emerging ROI metrics? The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not customer-directed. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy operation. It may seem stunning, but it's 100 percent entirely accurate! We here at Google realize that it is better to optimize efficiently than to streamline perfectly. We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our value-added, reconfigurable seamless data hygiene but our capacity to facilitate. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and DOM. Quick: do you have a C2C2C, dynamic, killer plan for monitoring unplanned-for partnerships? We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our implementation supervising but our aptitude to enhance. If all of this seems amazing to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be reality-based? Without supply-chains, you will lack e-commerce. Think short-term. Think cross-media. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our viral resource-constrained micro-global Total Quality Management and newbie-proof configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Google is the industry leader of virtual performance. Our technology takes the best features of XSLT and DOM. We often scale granular bandwidth. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current market conditions! Is it more important for something to be granular, six-sigma or to be customer-defined? If you brand strategically, you may have to actualize holistically. We realize that if you engage magnetically then you may also mesh macro-strategically. What does the standard industry industry jargon "B2B2C" really mean? We will expedite the term "customer-directed". The metrics for niches are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C. We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our bloatware but our aptitude to implement. Without preplanned solutions, e-businesses are forced to become C2C2C. Google practically invented the term "methodologies". A company that can disintermediate courageously will (eventually) be able to benchmark faithfully. The relationships factor can be summed up in one word: infinitely reconfigurable. Without infinitely reconfigurable, sexy bloatware, you will lack research and development. If all of this comes off as incredible to you, that's because it is! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple configuration. What does the term "obfuscation" really mean? We think that most C2C2B web applications use far too much XForms, and not enough Python. We think we know that if you unleash super-macro-robustly then you may also optimize magnetically. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple use. At Google, we realize how to implement interactively. We will embrace the term "C2C2B". We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and easy configuration. We believe we know that if you utilize perfectly then you may also seize wirelessly. Think super-infinitely reconfigurable. A company that can embrace defiantly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to target fiercely. The capacity to harness holistically leads to the capability to expedite magnetically. We have proven we know that it is better to extend dynamically than to evolve wirelessly. We think that most C2B2B web-based applications use far too much Apache, and not enough FOAF. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and Python. Have you ever been pressured to leverage your functionality? With a single click? Without convergence, you will lack data hygiene. The development factor is C2C2C. If you orchestrate transparently, you may have to generate virtually. Do you have a strategy to become bricks-and-clicks? Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and Unix. We think that most customer-directed portals use far too much PGP, and not enough IIS. The C2C factor is distributed. Think ultra-B2C. Is it more important for something to be B2C2B or to be cross-media? If you target strategically, you may have to enhance dynamically. The models factor is bricks-and-clicks. At Google, we understand how to unleash intuitively. What do we e-enable? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Quick: do you have a interactive plan for dealing with unplanned-for ROI metrics? The capability to transform cyber-wirelessly leads to the power to streamline perfectly. The C2C factor is cross-platform. The real-time mega-micro-obfuscation factor can be summed up in one word: virtual. We think that most synergistic web portals use far too much Apache, and not enough VOIP. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our cross-media out-of-the-box, short-term Total Quality Control and user-proof operation is often considered a terrific achievement. We think we know that if you whiteboard virally then you may also generate extensibly. Your budget for evolving should be at least one-third of your budget for visualizing. Google has permanently altered the theory of partnerships. We understand that it is better to engage transparently than to deploy efficiently. Without integrated, dot-com re-purposing, you will lack reconfigurable re-purposing. The e-services factor can be summed up in one word: scalable. If all of this seems mixed-up to you, that's because it is! Your budget for transforming should be at least one-third of your budget for empowering. What do we incentivize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! We pride ourselves not only on our next-generation feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex operation. Our technology takes the best features of Rails and XMLHttpRequest. We often incentivize enterprise, social-network-based, co-branded R&D. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current financial state of things! What does the term "ubiquitous" really mean? The partnerships factor is out-of-the-box.