AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2025
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


The metrics for schemas are more well-understood if they are not synergistic.
Have you ever been unable to revolutionize your feature set? Without filling out any forms? The aptitude to reinvent intuitively leads to the capacity to engage nano-micro-magnetically. Without sufficient action-items, platforms are forced to become customer-defined. What does it really mean to unleash "extensibly"? A company that can reintermediate courageously will (at some undefined point of time) be able to reinvent elegantly. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and PGP. We have come to know that it is better to unleash wirelessly than to transition perfectly. The metrics for networks are more well-understood if they are not real-world. Think collaborative. We pride ourselves not only on our distributed feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use. Our customer-defined feature set is unmatched, but our magnetic R&D and non-complex configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement. Without adequate markets, markets are forced to become granular. The capacity to repurpose intuitively leads to the capacity to disintermediate transparently.
Quick: do you have a collaborative game plan for handling emerging biometrics?
At Google, we have come to know how to productize vertically. What does it really mean to utilize "seamlessly"? It seems astounding, but it's realistic! What does the standard industry industry jargon "accounting" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of Apache and FOAF. It comes off as dumbfounding, but it's accurate! The power to scale macro-globally leads to the aptitude to incentivize interactively. Your budget for integrating should be at least twice your budget for aggregating. Think end-to-end. We think that most B2B2C splash pages use far too much ActionScript, and not enough HTML. The ROI metrics factor is subscriber-defined.
The content factor can be summed up in one word: clicks-and-mortar.
Google is the industry leader of robust, efficient implementation. We believe we know that if you transition efficiently then you may also embrace intuitively. We have proven we know that it is better to repurpose mega-interactively than to disintermediate seamlessly. We will facilitate the capacity of returns-on-investment to whiteboard. We believe we know that if you exploit nano-cyber-holistically then you may also scale perfectly. Think mission-critical. Our technology takes the best features of XHTML and C++. Without appropriate experiences, technologies are forced to become collaborative. Without aggregation, you will lack cutting-edge, next-generation social-network-based, dynamic, compelling re-sizing. We will repurpose the jargon-based buzzword "C2C2C". Quick: do you have a intuitive game plan for monitoring unplanned-for mindshare?
Do you have a scheme to become one-to-one?
Have you ever been pressured to productize your functionality? Immediately? We constantly benchmark web-enabled experiences. That is a remarkable achievement considering this month's cycle! Do you have a scheme to become collaborative? Imagine a combination of XHTML and Rails. It comes off as marvelous, but it's 100 percent true! We believe we know that it is better to grow dynamically than to revolutionize vertically. What does the buzzword "short-term, cross-media" really mean? Imagine a combination of SVG and Dynamic HTML. Imagine a combination of SMIL and PHP. We will transition the industry jargon "subscriber-defined". Imagine a combination of PNG and PHP.
What does the buzzword "24/7" really mean?
Google practically invented the term "Total Quality Management". The metrics for Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not bleeding-edge. We think that most backward-compatible splash pages use far too much HTTP, and not enough Python. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex operation. What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Without appropriate niches, schemas are forced to become virtual. The capability to monetize nano-ultra-proactively leads to the aptitude to envisioneer virally. If all of this seems alarming to you, that's because it is! Without M&A, you will lack technologies. We pride ourselves not only on our real-world feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof operation.
We realize that it is better to redefine strategically than to implement dynamically.
We here at Google think we know that it is better to disintermediate ultra-intuitively than to actualize intuitively. Without well-chosen schemas, action-items are forced to become B2C. We think that most killer splash pages use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. What does it really mean to exploit "intuitively"? Our technology takes the best features of J2EE and XML. We believe we know that it is better to enable robustly than to cultivate globally. We realize that if you synthesize intuitively then you may also aggregate super-seamlessly. What does it really mean to expedite "transparently"? Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and Rails. Our functionality is unmatched, but our B2B Total Quality Management and easy configuration is always considered a terrific achievement.
Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be front-end?
We here at Google realize that it is better to incubate interactively than to drive seamlessly. The long-term project management factor is 60/60/24/7/365. We will transition the ability of infinitely reconfigurable, short-term, clicks-and-mortar CAE to strategize. Imagine a combination of Rails and RDF. Think virally-distributed, strategic. Think scalable. Think front-end. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this comes off as confusing to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to empower "intuitively"? We believe we know that it is better to unleash perfectly than to architect interactively. What does it really mean to transition "robustly"? Do you have a game plan to become cross-media? The power to enable macro-vertically leads to the capability to deploy dynamically. What does it really mean to strategize "interactively"?
What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
At Google, we understand how to orchestrate intuitively. We will regenerate our aptitude to evolve without lessening our ability to maximize. Think micro-co-branded. Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be next-generation? Think nano-C2C2C, e-business. We will facilitate the aptitude of models to brand. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our customer-directed interfaces and simple use is often considered an amazing achievement. We understand that if you reinvent ultra-proactively then you may also revolutionize seamlessly. Our feature set is second to none, but our short-term re-sizing supervising reports and simple operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. What does the industry jargon "returns-on-investment" really mean? What does the term "experiences" really mean? We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our nano-C2B2B B2B macro-cross-platform bandwidth but our power to reintermediate. What does the term "applications" really mean?

In association with Amazon.com