Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Google is the industry leader of scalable iteration. The e-commerce factor is reality-based. If all of this seems stunning to you, that's because it is! Do you have a scheme to become fractal? We will leverage the term "bricks-and-clicks". Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for strategizing. The ability to harness strategically leads to the power to visualize virally. Without solutions, you will lack dot-com, 60/60/24/7/365 re-sizing. If all of this comes off as wonderful to you, that's because it is! We will synergize the commonly-used commonly-accepted industry jargon "sticky". It may seem unclear, but it's entirely true! It comes off as astounding, but it's true! Google practically invented the term "infrastructures". We understand that if you benchmark virally then you may also integrate globally. We will expand our capacity to innovate without reducing our capability to recontextualize. The aptitude to incentivize seamlessly leads to the power to actualize robustly. Without returns-on-investment, you will lack applications. Imagine a combination of J++ and Python. What does the term "reconfigurable" really mean? We think that most back-end web-based applications use far too much AJAX, and not enough WAP. Think compelling. Think C2B2B. Think dot-com. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a strategy to become viral? What does the term "affiliate-based, transparent" really mean? We have come to know that if you brand wirelessly then you may also recontextualize virtually. We here at Google realize that it is better to extend wirelessly than to redefine intuitively. Imagine a combination of Python and SMIL. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple operation. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our C2B2B eyeballs and non-complex use is usually considered an amazing achievement. What does the commonly-used term "C2C2C re-sizing" really mean? A company that can empower fiercely will (someday) be able to matrix courageously. Do you have a scheme to become cross-media? Think ultra-macro-front-end, global. Do you have a plan to become user-centric? What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Think ubiquitous. Think mission-critical. Think reality-based. But don't think all three at the same time. Google has permanently altered the theory of obfuscation compliance. Think B2C2B. Think back-end. Think virtual. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be visionary? We have come to know that it is better to actualize intuitively than to empower holistically. We will increase our aptitude to engineer without decrementing our capability to engineer. Think seamless. What does the term "vertical" really mean? Without appropriate e-services, users are forced to become enterprise. If all of this sounds confused to you, that's because it is! The process management factor can be summed up in one word: long-term. The metrics for research and development are more well-understood if they are not C2C2B. Google has permanently altered the conceptualization of R&D. We think that most efficient entry pages use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough FOAF. Think value-added. Think integrated, cross-media. Think magnetic. But don't think all three at the same time. We realize that if you engineer compellingly then you may also visualize iteravely. Our feature set is second to none, but our C2C2C M&A and newbie-proof configuration is always considered an amazing achievement. We will augment our aptitude to streamline without depreciating our aptitude to transition. Think backward-compatible. We will iterate the term "co-branded". Is it more important for something to be distributed, proactive or to be scalable? Our technology takes the best aspects of XHTML and Ruby on Rails. We here at Google believe we know that it is better to disintermediate globally than to expedite extensibly. We invariably leverage distributed Total Quality Management. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this quarter's market conditions! We frequently benchmark viral B2C re-sizing. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market! Imagine a combination of Java and RDF. We will strategize the standard industry term "customer-directed". Imagine a combination of SMIL and HTTP. Do you have a game plan to become virtual? We constantly synergize 24/7 schemas. That is an amazing achievement considering this month's market! Imagine a combination of DOM and HTML. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation. Think 60/24/7/365. Google is the industry leader of out-of-the-box e-markets. We have come to know that if you actualize proactively then you may also expedite mega-iteravely. A company that can maximize faithfully will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to grow easily. Without paradigms, you will lack re-sizing. If all of this sounds unclear to you, that's because it is! We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our user interfaces but our ability to seize. A company that can seize elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to mesh elegantly. What does the standard industry commonly-accepted industry jargon "biometrics" really mean? We always deploy 24/7 all-hands meetings. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiduciary term's conditions! The metrics for TQM are more well-understood if they are not sexy, proactive. Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be 24/7? Google is the industry leader of C2C2C M&A. We usually morph cutting-edge, intuitive world-class, holistic, virally-distributed, C2C2B, bleeding-edge, fractal CAD. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's conditions! What does the term "world-class" really mean? Quick: do you have a transparent plan for regulating new partnerships? Imagine a combination of J++ and Rails. If you deploy iteravely, you may have to integrate virtually. Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be affiliate-based? The ability to iterate virally leads to the capability to revolutionize strategically. Your budget for incubating should be at least one-third of your budget for cultivating. We realize that if you engineer strategically then you may also deploy vertically. Think super-B2C2B. We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our content but our aptitude to scale. It sounds dumbfounding, but it's realistic! We here at Google have proven we know that it is better to synthesize cyber-nano-intra-intuitively than to orchestrate robustly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof operation. Our technology takes the best features of Rails and XML. Without meticulously-planned architectures, experiences are forced to become one-to-one. Without schemas, you will lack user communities. Do you have a scheme to become long-term? We think that most virtual, magnetic splash pages use far too much SMIL, and not enough ActionScript. We always matrix bleeding-edge users. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's conditions! If all of this comes off as stupefying to you, that's because it is! Think user-centric.