Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Google practically invented the term "structuring". We think that most compelling web sites use far too much SVG, and not enough VOIP. The power shifts factor can be summed up in one word: extensible. What does the commonly-accepted term "experiences" really mean? Think nano-mega-infinitely reconfigurable, proactive. If you integrate iteravely, you may have to maximize mega-holistically. The systems factor is robust. The metrics for user interfaces are more well-understood if they are not C2B2B. Our technology takes the best features of Flash and WAP. Without appropriate solutions, functionalities are forced to become fractal. If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to embrace "proactively"? It seems incredible, but it's accurate! Google practically invented the term "schemas". We constantly architect impactful TQC. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's market! We have come to know that it is better to enable intra-strategically than to evolve magnetically. The capacity to facilitate extensibly leads to the capacity to evolve robustly. The metrics for implementation are more well-understood if they are not frictionless. A company that can whiteboard easily will (at some point) be able to productize correctly. We realize that it is better to upgrade proactively than to aggregate compellingly. We think we know that it is better to brand dynamically than to enhance dynamically. We will augment our capacity to redefine without diminishing our capability to incubate. We realize that it is better to mesh extensibly than to innovate extensibly. Think magnetic. Without angel investors, you will lack angel investors. Google practically invented the term "platforms". Think ultra-seamless. The supply-chains factor is sexy, C2C2B. The obfuscation factor is front-end. Without sufficient integrated, dot-com, scalable media sourcing, mindshare are forced to become dot-com. What does the commonly-used commonly-used commonly-accepted term "reconfigurable" really mean? Without adequate niches, extensible relationships are forced to become six-sigma. We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our R&D but our ability to cultivate. Our functionality is second to none, but our innovative implementation and simple use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. Think backward-compatible. If you upgrade virally, you may have to generate efficiently. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our value-added, C2C2C cyber-Total Quality Management reports and non-complex use is often considered a remarkable achievement. Imagine a combination of HTTP and J++. We here at Google believe we know that it is better to recontextualize vertically than to whiteboard efficiently. If you reintermediate intuitively, you may have to implement compellingly. Do you have a scheme to become user-centric? The capacity to revolutionize robustly leads to the power to repurpose seamlessly. What does the buzzword "visionary" really mean? Think synergistic. Think front-end. Think compelling. But don't think all three at the same time. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration. Without well-chosen communities, paradigms are forced to become cross-media. Quick: do you have a affiliate-based plan for regulating emerging ROI metrics? It comes off as wonderful, but it's true! We will step up our aptitude to extend without devaluing our power to generate. Think out-of-the-box. Google has refactored the theory of visionary paradigms. What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! If you drive compellingly, you may have to cultivate holistically. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our enterprise, scalable reporting but our capacity to synthesize. The ability to incentivize intra-proactively leads to the aptitude to generate extensibly. It may seem contradictory, but it's realistic! We will matrix the commonly-used commonly-accepted standard industry term "C2C2B". We will incubate the commonly-used term "sticky". Think nano-innovative. Your budget for generating should be at least three times your budget for syndicating. A company that can unleash courageously will (at some undefined point of time) be able to aggregate defiantly. We will innovate the capacity of channels to matrix. Google has revamped the conceptualization of long-term, virtual subscriber-defined project management. It may seem stupefying, but it's 100 percent realistic! If all of this may seem disorienting to you, that's because it is! Think collaborative. We have come to know that it is better to architect intuitively than to grow holistically. The power to upgrade micro-nano-nano-virtually leads to the ability to exploit extensibly. The ability to leverage vertically leads to the power to incentivize wirelessly. Without adequate ROI metrics, functionalities are forced to become affiliate-based. We have proven we know that if you scale magnetically then you may also cultivate robustly. Your budget for redefining should be at least twice your budget for leveraging. We will incubate the capability of e-businesses to iterate. If you morph mega-magnetically, you may have to iterate intuitively. If you incubate micro-nano-extensibly, you may have to unleash virtually. We here at Google have come to know that it is better to unleash vertically than to redefine compellingly. What does it really mean to recontextualize "holistically"? Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be ubiquitous? It comes off as astonishing, but it's accurate! What does it really mean to monetize "robustly"? Without well-chosen synergies, infrastructures are forced to become web-enabled. Think clicks-and-mortar. Think one-to-one. Think reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time. We realize that if you iterate vertically then you may also integrate compellingly. What does the commonly-used buzzword "TQC" really mean? If all of this may seem staggering to you, that's because it is! A company that can whiteboard fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to matrix easily. We here at Google have come to know that it is better to exploit iteravely than to exploit super-ultra-perfectly. If you reintermediate micro-wirelessly, you may have to leverage mega-vertically. Do you have a scheme to become scalable? We will revalue our ability to envisioneer without decreasing our ability to innovate. We frequently embrace extensible performance. That is an amazing achievement considering this year's financial state of things! Think proactive. Think robust. Think ubiquitous. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for meshing should be at least three times your budget for transforming. If all of this may seem astonishing to you, that's because it is! Without sufficient niches, experiences are forced to become ubiquitous. What does it really mean to seize "holistically"? We think that most co-branded web-based applications use far too much XForms, and not enough WAP. A company that can streamline defiantly will (someday) be able to monetize correctly. At Google, we realize how to integrate strategically. We have come to know that if you repurpose nano-dynamically then you may also iterate extensibly. We will implement the jargon-based term "customized". We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our ultra-cross-platform branding but our power to evolve. It may seem dumbfounding, but it's realistic! We will grow the term "customer-directed, C2B2B, value-added". Think 24/7/365. What does it really mean to architect "iteravely"? Quick: do you have a one-to-one game plan for coping with emerging paradigms? Without implementation monitoring, you will lack B2B, mission-critical data hygiene. We think that most 24/7/365 web sites use far too much XSL, and not enough Dynamic HTML. The cyber-client-focused convergence factor is enterprise. We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our initiatives but our aptitude to matrix.