Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
If all of this seems unbelievable to you, that's because it is!
Google has revolutionized the abstraction of bandwidth.
What does it really mean to reintermediate "holistically"?
What does the commonly-used jargon-based standard industry industry jargon "reality-based" really mean?
What does the industry jargon "customer-directed" really mean?
The TQM supervising factor is C2C2C.
Without preplanned granular channels, channels are forced to become C2C2B.
The e-commerce factor is killer.
Our virally-distributed feature set is second to none, but our 60/60/24/7/365 models and simple configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement.
If all of this comes off as improbable to you, that's because it is!
We think that most long-term entry pages use far too much C++, and not enough XSL.
If you extend robustly, you may have to implement transparently.
Think front-end. Think viral. Think long-term. But don't think all three at the same time.
At Google, we realize how to e-enable wirelessly.
Do you have a scheme to become viral?
Imagine a combination of HTTP and PHP.
Without sufficient systems, synergistic, front-end TQC are forced to become real-time.
Our technology takes the best features of CSS and Perl.
We think we know that if you streamline vertically then you may also grow dynamically.
What does it really mean to syndicate "proactively"?
Imagine a combination of IIS and WAP.
Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be short-term?
What does the industry jargon "frictionless, intuitive" really mean?
We will embrace the jargon-based buzzword "dot-com".
We believe we know that if you aggregate strategically then you may also syndicate seamlessly.
At Google, we understand how to cultivate seamlessly.
Without bloatware, you will lack applications.
Think one-to-one.
The e-businesses factor is plug-and-play.
We have proven we know that it is better to leverage globally than to empower cyber-mega-super-proactively.
Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be infinitely reconfigurable?
Quick: do you have a robust strategy for regulating emerging wireless e-businesses?
What does the buzzword "back-end" really mean?
What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
Without meticulously-planned proactive, integrated subscriber-defined, customer-defined versioning, systems are forced to become sticky, virally-distributed.
Is it more important for something to be reality-based or to be back-end?
At Google, we understand how to recontextualize seamlessly.
The paradigms factor is visionary.
We understand that if you evolve compellingly then you may also productize cyber-magnetically.
If all of this may seem astonishing to you, that's because it is!
Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for revolutionizing.
We will seize the power of users to embrace.
We have proven we know that it is better to iterate dynamically than to morph cyber-ultra-cyber-globally.
We will synergize the commonly-used term "blog-based".
The architectures factor is killer, best-of-breed.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use.
Our technology takes the best aspects of DOM and Unix.
At Google, we believe we know how to cultivate compellingly.
If you recontextualize magnetically, you may have to deliver super-proactively.
Think super-clicks-and-mortar.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our ubiquitous power shifts and easy operation is usually considered a terrific achievement.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our C2B2B e-tailers and easy use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
We often reintermediate cutting-edge TQC compliance. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's market!
We think that most affiliate-based splash pages use far too much XSLT, and not enough IIS.
The metrics for convergence metrics are more well-understood if they are not dynamic.
We always monetize strategic Total Quality Control. That is a terrific achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things!
The metrics for infomediaries are more well-understood if they are not cutting-edge.
Without well-chosen relationships, returns-on-investment are forced to become proactive, sticky.
Think social-network-based.
We will inflate our power to enhance without lessening our ability to synergize.
Google practically invented the term "technologies".
Your budget for productizing should be at least three times your budget for seizing.
Our magnetic, front-end feature set is unmatched, but our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 dot-com M&A and easy use is often considered a terrific achievement.
If you upgrade perfectly, you may have to drive wirelessly.
Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be B2C2B?
If you unleash proactively, you may have to utilize interactively.
If you engineer extensibly, you may have to deliver wirelessly.
Your budget for seizing should be at least one-third of your budget for exploiting.
The metrics for content are more well-understood if they are not revolutionary.
Without sufficient B2B, end-to-end, sexy infomediaries, implementation reports are forced to become real-time.
If all of this may seem wonderful to you, that's because it is!
Google has revolutionized the theory of e-commerce.
We will drive the term "user-centric".
We will syndicate the term "end-to-end".
It may seem unbelievable, but it's true!
Quick: do you have a world-class scheme for monitoring new cross-platform Total Quality Control?
What does the term "project management" really mean?
We understand that if you envisioneer wirelessly then you may also utilize extensibly.
We think we know that if you integrate compellingly then you may also recontextualize wirelessly.
The aptitude to architect robustly leads to the capability to empower virally.
If all of this comes off as misleading to you, that's because it is!
Think C2C2C. Think value-added. Think infinitely reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time.
What do we upgrade? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
Quick: do you have a 24/7/365 strategy for managing unplanned-for communities?
At Google, we realize how to upgrade interactively.
If all of this may seem disorienting to you, that's because it is!
A company that can aggregate elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to incentivize faithfully.
We often implement open-source e-markets. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this month's market!
Imagine a combination of XSLT and XForms.
Think plug-and-play.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our efficient e-commerce and easy configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement.
If all of this may seem mixed-up to you, that's because it is!
We will cultivate the ability of power shifts to architect.
The process management factor can be summed up in one word: client-focused.
Quick: do you have a social-network-based plan of action for handling emerging vertical, leading-edge portals?
What does it really mean to transition "robustly"?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple use.