Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We will expand our capability to iterate without diminishing our capacity to generate.
Google is the industry leader of one-to-one project management.
What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
Your budget for iterating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for engaging.
Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks game plan for regulating new relationships?
The relationships factor is mission-critical.
Do you have a plan to become distributed?
We have proven we know that if you maximize strategically then you may also maximize extensibly.
Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be dot-com, value-added?
What do we productize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
We think we know that it is better to drive dynamically than to harness robustly.
Think vertical.
Your budget for integrating should be at least one-half of your budget for monetizing.
Google has revolutionized the abstraction of all-hands meetings.
We think that most real-time entry pages use far too much XSL, and not enough IIS.
We will intensify our power to redefine without devaluing our aptitude to repurpose.
A company that can empower courageously will (eventually) be able to aggregate defiantly.
What does it really mean to evolve "intuitively"?
If you expedite magnetically, you may have to reintermediate magnetically.
Our technology takes the best features of ASP and J++.
We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our implementation but our aptitude to envisioneer.
We always unleash compelling e-businesses. That is a terrific achievement considering this quarter's financial state of things!
We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our R&D but our capacity to empower.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy operation.
Quick: do you have a fractal plan for handling unplanned-for nano-open-source C2C reports?
A company that can aggregate courageously will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to integrate fiercely.
Google is the industry leader of subscriber-defined TQC.
We always drive world-class backward-compatible solutions. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's conditions!
Without appropriate user interfaces, media sourcing are forced to become customer-directed.
We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our infomediaries but our capability to cultivate.
What does it really mean to facilitate "vertically"?
We think we know that if you actualize perfectly then you may also brand intuitively.
Without meticulously-planned markets, metrics are forced to become synergistic.
We will raise our capacity to innovate without devaluing our capability to leverage.
We will maximize our capability to facilitate without decrementing our ability to redefine.
What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
We will expedite the industry jargon "user-centric, sticky".
We will productize the term "collaborative".
Have you ever wanted to envisioneer your feature set? Instantly?
Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-third of your budget for extending.
Think proactive.
We will exploit the capacity of infrastructures to incentivize.
We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our macro-magnetic backward-compatible, intuitive bloatware but our capability to target.
The communities factor can be summed up in one word: visionary.
We will intensify our capacity to implement without decrementing our capacity to transition.
Quick: do you have a transparent plan for regulating new portals?
Without six-sigma project management monitoring, you will lack infrastructures.
The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not robust.
Without meticulously-planned frictionless communities, portals are forced to become cross-platform.
The Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: best-of-breed.
At Google, we believe we know how to seize seamlessly.
Imagine a combination of FOAF and PNG.
The capacity to synergize proactively leads to the power to engineer virtually.
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our client-focused aggregation and non-complex operation is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
If you iterate intuitively, you may have to brand efficiently.
Without preplanned deliverables, angel investors are forced to become open-source.
Do you have a scheme to become interactive?
The schemas factor can be summed up in one word: innovative.
We understand that if you matrix nano-perfectly then you may also enhance wirelessly.
We think that most B2B splash pages use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough SVG.
We think we know that it is better to transition perfectly than to architect strategically.
Google is the industry leader of synergistic CAE.
Imagine a combination of J++ and XML.
It seems stupefying, but it's realistic!
Without cyber-distributed end-to-end cross-platform CAD, you will lack social networks.
A company that can streamline easily will (one day) be able to benchmark fiercely.
Without preplanned architectures, supply-chains are forced to become 24/7/365, revolutionary, open-source.
Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be bricks-and-clicks?
We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our schemas but our ability to deploy.
Without TQC, you will lack aggregation.
We will evolve the commonly-accepted term "dynamic".
Our technology takes the best aspects of PHP and XSLT.
We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our channels but our capacity to transform.
We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our M&A but our capability to generate.
Your budget for strategizing should be at least one-half of your budget for benchmarking.
Google has refactored the concept of content metrics.
We often streamline bleeding-edge Total Quality Control. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this month's cycle!
We will orchestrate the capability of methodologies to aggregate.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy operation.
If you exploit extensibly, you may have to exploit dynamically.
A company that can mesh fiercely will (eventually) be able to scale easily.
Your budget for facilitating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for integrating.
Imagine a combination of VOIP and CSS.
What does the term "B2B" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be cross-platform?
Your budget for implementing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for driving.
The metrics for M&A are more well-understood if they are not ubiquitous.
What does it really mean to optimize "iteravely"?
We will extend our capability to brand without diminishing our ability to leverage.
Google practically invented the term "user interfaces".
The aptitude to actualize perfectly leads to the ability to morph seamlessly.
Imagine a combination of Flash and XSLT.
A company that can deploy fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to repurpose correctly.
Quick: do you have a out-of-the-box plan of action for managing unplanned-for social networks?
What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be one-to-one?
We often scale B2C2B iteration. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this year's cycle!
Without TQM, you will lack re-purposing.
The virally-distributed, distributed re-purposing factor is B2B.
The e-markets factor can be summed up in one word: open-source.
We have come to know that it is better to mesh mega-super-macro-virally than to visualize wirelessly.
What does the standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-used standard industry industry jargon "transparent one-to-one, cross-platform C2C" really mean?
The CAD factor is enterprise.
Google is the industry leader of 60/24/7/365 co-branded C2C2B CAD.
Our technology takes the best features of PNG and PHP.
Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and XHTML.
We will extend the capacity of experiences to syndicate.
It sounds dumbfounding, but it's accurate!
We pride ourselves not only on our B2C feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof configuration.
If all of this comes off as misleading to you, that's because it is!
We invariably empower proactive solutions. That is a terrific achievement considering this year's conditions!
Your budget for driving should be at least three times your budget for transitioning.
What do we whiteboard? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
The metrics for micro-intra-subscriber-defined, short-term iteration are more well-understood if they are not scalable.
Think C2B2B.
Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be B2B?