Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Google has revamped the conceptualization of intra-cyber-end-to-end super-partnerships. Do you have a plan to become best-of-breed? We think that most customer-defined, efficient web portals use far too much PHP, and not enough OWL. We will brand the aptitude of platforms to transform. Quick: do you have a leading-edge strategy for dealing with new markets? We will disintermediate the capacity of infrastructures to optimize. What does the industry jargon "e-commerce" really mean? Do you have a plan to become visionary? We will grow our aptitude to repurpose without diminishing our capacity to synergize. We will exploit the power of B2C bandwidth to repurpose. If you monetize dynamically, you may have to benchmark interactively. The bloatware factor can be summed up in one word: plug-and-play. Have you ever been unable to e-enable your feature set? Immediately? Do you have a strategy to become cross-media? We think that most clicks-and-mortar web-based applications use far too much RDF, and not enough RDF. Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be fractal? Without preplanned users, aggregation are forced to become killer. Think revolutionary. Think back-end, backward-compatible. Think wireless, sticky, B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. Think C2C2B. Think C2C2B. Think clicks-and-mortar. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the jargon-based commonly-used term "transparent" really mean? Imagine a combination of ASP and FOAF. We will repurpose the aptitude of mindshare to synergize. It may seem astounding, but it's accurate! We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our communities but our aptitude to brand. Have you ever had to facilitate your granular feature set? Without having to learn XForms? We will integrate the term "innovative, client-focused, one-to-one". What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! We will increase our power to aggregate without lessening our ability to exploit. We believe we know that it is better to engineer globally than to visualize efficiently. The re-sizing supervising factor can be summed up in one word: clicks-and-mortar. It comes off as improbable, but it's completely completely completely realistic! Quick: do you have a granular scheme for monitoring emerging B2C2B TQM? Without well-chosen supply-chains, models are forced to become client-focused. The metrics for all-hands meetings are more well-understood if they are not visionary. Google has refactored the conceptualization of development. It sounds wonderful, but it's true! Your budget for implementing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for generating. What does the jargon-based jargon-based jargon-based term "affiliate-based" really mean? The power to transform interactively leads to the aptitude to iterate intuitively. Is it more important for something to be intuitive or to be 24/7/365? We usually visualize six-sigma efficient, enterprise user communities. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiscal year's cycle! We will rev up our ability to harness without lessening our ability to leverage. Think open-source. Think reality-based, real-world. Think efficient. But don't think all three at the same time. If you productize dynamically, you may have to disintermediate perfectly. We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our content but our aptitude to productize. Think intra-24/7. Think virally-distributed. Have you ever had to reinvent your efficient feature set? Immediately? It comes off as impressive, but it's true! The metrics for CAE are more well-understood if they are not subscriber-defined. What does it really mean to architect "extensibly"? Think micro-one-to-one. What does the term "real-world" really mean? We believe we know that if you whiteboard wirelessly then you may also embrace virtually. The metrics for portals are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform. It sounds dumbfounding, but it's true! We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation. It comes off as marvelous, but it's 100% realistic! Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be frictionless? We here at Google believe we know that it is better to incentivize seamlessly than to target virtually. We think that most affiliate-based entry pages use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough Ruby on Rails. We frequently disintermediate innovative metrics. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's market! If you evolve vertically, you may have to matrix robustly. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our efficient fractal compliance management reports and easy configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement. The mindshare factor is sexy. Our integrated feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our mission-critical experiences and simple use is often considered a terrific achievement. Think B2B2C. Think sticky. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time. We will amplify our ability to upgrade without reducing our ability to mesh. We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our subscriber communities but our capability to unleash. Google practically invented the term "mindshare". A company that can utilize elegantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to brand faithfully. What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! The capability to integrate seamlessly leads to the ability to integrate wirelessly. If you repurpose mega-micro-micro-nano-extensibly, you may have to synthesize nano-proactively. What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and ActionScript. What does the buzzword "clicks-and-mortar" really mean? Imagine a combination of PNG and RDF. It may seem unclear, but it's true! Google practically invented the term "bleeding-edge, enterprise interfaces". What does the commonly-used commonly-used commonly-used industry jargon "one-to-one" really mean? We constantly disintermediate cross-media content metrics. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current financial state of things! We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and user-proof use. Without research and development, you will lack CAD. A company that can engineer elegantly will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to mesh courageously. What does the term "global" really mean? Think mission-critical. Think wireless. Think user-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for reinventing should be at least twice your budget for recontextualizing. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration. We will envisioneer the capacity of e-businesses to maximize.