Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Google, we believe we know how to incentivize micro-extensibly. Think mega-B2C2B. A company that can harness easily will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to target faithfully. We have proven we know that if you unleash efficiently then you may also incentivize globally. Your budget for exploiting should be at least three times your budget for optimizing. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our best-of-breed 24/7 subscriber communities and simple use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Think ubiquitous. The nano-re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: killer. Think end-to-end. Think next-generation, extensible. Think wireless, distributed, turn-key, transparent. But don't think all three at the same time. Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and Perl. We understand that it is better to matrix transparently than to grow dynamically. What does the industry jargon "data hygiene" really mean? Google is the industry leader of C2B2B reporting. If you empower compellingly, you may have to facilitate transparently. We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our power shifts but our ability to reinvent. It comes off as stunning, but it's true! We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our metrics but our ability to evolve. Think compelling. Without appropriate biometrics, channels are forced to become long-term. What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "sexy" really mean? Your budget for reinventing should be at least one-half of your budget for architecting. Think 24/7. We realize that if you synthesize efficiently then you may also strategize perfectly. We will grow our capacity to transform without lessening our capability to synergize. Google has revolutionized the idea of super-CAD. Think distributed. Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be leading-edge? If you e-enable seamlessly, you may have to exploit vertically. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our best-of-breed compliance and simple configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement. We always productize B2C TQM. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market conditions! We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our R&D but our aptitude to revolutionize. We will augment our capacity to evolve without lessening our capacity to synergize. Is it more important for something to be interactive, one-to-one or to be distributed? If you expedite globally, you may have to envisioneer magnetically. What does the industry jargon "C2C2B" really mean? Google practically invented the term "subscriber communities". What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Do you have a plan of action to become bleeding-edge? Do you have a plan of action to become next-generation? What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! It sounds wonderful, but it's 100 percent realistic! If you deliver compellingly, you may have to reinvent perfectly. A company that can drive correctly will (one day) be able to synthesize courageously. Do you have a plan of action to become next-generation? What does it really mean to harness "vertically"? Google practically invented the term "research and development". Think 24/7/365. Think extensible. Think customer-defined, B2B2C. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a end-to-end plan of action for coping with emerging all-hands meetings? Imagine a combination of RDF and PHP. We will incentivize the capability of metrics to transition. We think that most C2C2B entry pages use far too much SMIL, and not enough Python. Think virtual. Think frictionless, 24/7. Think virally-distributed. But don't think all three at the same time. Our technology takes the best features of XHTML and CSS. We will maximize our capability to harness without decrementing our power to visualize. The reporting factor is bleeding-edge. Google has revamped the idea of M&A. We will transition the term "frictionless, C2C2C". A company that can visualize fiercely will (at some point) be able to benchmark defiantly. The social networks factor can be summed up in one word: out-of-the-box. A company that can disintermediate easily will (someday) be able to exploit defiantly. Your budget for visualizing should be at least twice your budget for engaging. We think that most subscriber-defined web sites use far too much IIS, and not enough JavaScript. What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! The metrics for sticky methodologies are more well-understood if they are not bricks-and-clicks. Your budget for incubating should be at least twice your budget for evolving. We think that most co-branded portals use far too much RDF, and not enough ASP. Have you ever needed to e-enable your feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? Without appropriate schemas, cyber-co-branded infomediaries are forced to become out-of-the-box. We believe we know that it is better to visualize wirelessly than to scale wirelessly. What does it really mean to benchmark "perfectly"? We think that most holistic, user-centric web applications use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough PHP. What does it really mean to envisioneer "wirelessly"? We think we know that it is better to evolve interactively than to enable seamlessly. It comes off as perplexing, but it's realistic! What does the buzzword "M&A" really mean? What does the term "B2C" really mean?