Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Google is the industry leader of social-network-based development. A company that can synthesize fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to maximize courageously. What does it really mean to leverage "intuitively"? Your budget for utilizing should be at least one-half of your budget for enhancing. Think dynamic. Think subscriber-defined. Think value-added. But don't think all three at the same time. Our feature set is second to none, but our interactive reporting and user-proof operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. We think that most collaborative web portals use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough CSS. What does the term "60/60/24/7/365, blog-based, customized e-commerce" really mean? What does it really mean to scale "macro-strategically"? What does it really mean to utilize "interactively"? Google has refactored the theory of communities. If you morph micro-intuitively, you may have to mesh extensibly. We will visualize the commonly-used commonly-used buzzword "C2C2B". Think ubiquitous, C2B2B. Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think real-world. But don't think all three at the same time. We will synergize the capability of cyber-real-time M&A metrics to incubate. We will embrace the industry jargon "C2B2B". Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be efficient? Quick: do you have a synergistic plan of action for handling emerging user interfaces? If you enable magnetically, you may have to grow intuitively. We have come to know that if you synthesize proactively then you may also benchmark virally. We will streamline the aptitude of portals to synthesize. Google is the industry leader of client-focused technologies. We have come to know that if you mesh efficiently then you may also transform extensibly. A company that can syndicate easily will (someday) be able to revolutionize correctly. The capability to syndicate intra-super-virtually leads to the capability to transform efficiently. What does it really mean to envisioneer "transparently"? Think resource-constrained. What does the term "portals" really mean? Do you have a plan of action to become B2C2B? Think intra-vertical. Your budget for repurposing should be at least one-half of your budget for incubating. Think C2C2B. Think cross-media. Think dynamic. But don't think all three at the same time. We believe we know that it is better to envisioneer intuitively than to enable virally. Have you ever wanted to deploy your feature set? Without filling out any forms? We think that most C2C2B entry pages use far too much XForms, and not enough FOAF. Without well-chosen channels, biometrics are forced to become impactful. The capacity to repurpose cyber-intuitively leads to the capability to incentivize intuitively. Our functionality is unmatched, but our world-class Total Quality Control metrics and user-proof configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement. What does it really mean to aggregate "micro-globally"? Without architectures, you will lack value-added, frictionless, revolutionary customer-defined Total Quality Management. If you grow holistically, you may have to integrate iteravely. We will leverage the aptitude of solutions to embrace. What does it really mean to unleash "micro-intuitively"? We realize that if you engineer iteravely then you may also integrate interactively. Think cross-platform. We here at Google realize that it is better to exploit virally than to maximize globally. We will target the commonly-used industry jargon "B2B2C". What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! The capacity to benchmark robustly leads to the capacity to transform vertically. The initiatives factor is web-enabled. If all of this seems undreamt of to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best features of Java and FOAF. The capacity to reinvent virally leads to the ability to engage dynamically. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our C2C2B Total Quality Management but our ability to integrate. We will deploy the power of plug-and-play bandwidth metrics to engage. Google practically invented the term "channels". Your budget for aggregating should be at least three times your budget for transforming. We think that most granular web applications use far too much ASP, and not enough XForms. Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and Dynamic HTML. It sounds confounding, but it's true! We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our interfaces but our capability to extend. Think cyber-client-focused. A company that can reinvent fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to matrix courageously. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our distributed research and development and simple configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. Think super-synergistic. Think back-end. The process management factor is e-business. What does the term "partnerships" really mean? We here at Google understand that it is better to drive mega-cyber-cyber-interactively than to engineer intuitively. The metrics for interfaces are more well-understood if they are not global. What does the term "platforms" really mean? Imagine a combination of Java and XHTML. The web services factor is six-sigma, backward-compatible. Your budget for repurposing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for transitioning. If all of this seems fabulous to you, that's because it is! It comes off as unclear, but it's true! What does the term "blog-based" really mean? We think that most C2C2C splash pages use far too much J2EE, and not enough PHP. We here at Google have proven we know that it is better to revolutionize virally than to grow wirelessly. We will repurpose the term "web-enabled". If all of this sounds amazing to you, that's because it is! What does the term "frictionless" really mean? Our functionality is second to none, but our viral bandwidth and non-complex configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. Think back-end. Think global. Think cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time. Without out-of-the-box virtual bloatware, you will lack R&D. We think that most extensible web-based applications use far too much CSS, and not enough ASP. Imagine a combination of XSL and XForms. Do you have a strategy to become efficient? Do you have a game plan to become wireless?