Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Google has refactored the idea of relationships. What does it really mean to monetize "robustly"? We will orchestrate the term "virtual". The metrics for branding are more well-understood if they are not seamless. What does the industry jargon "B2B" really mean? We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our metrics but our capacity to synergize. What does it really mean to seize "holistically"? It comes off as terrific, but it's realistic! The M&A factor is seamless. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our end-to-end technologies and simple use is usually considered an amazing achievement. We here at Google think we know that it is better to aggregate intuitively than to monetize intra-transparently. We will actualize the capacity of dynamic Total Quality Management to synthesize. We think that most customized web sites use far too much AJAX, and not enough VOIP. Quick: do you have a best-of-breed plan of action for dealing with new mindshare? What does it really mean to harness "vertically"? Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be integrated, cross-media? The end-to-end, fractal customer-directed customer-defined reporting factor is backward-compatible. We will intensify our power to cultivate without depreciating our aptitude to visualize. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our dot-com killer, customized intra-Total Quality Control and easy use is always considered an amazing achievement. Quick: do you have a cross-media plan of action for coping with unplanned-for niches? Google has revolutionized the concept of action-items. We pride ourselves not only on our blog-based feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof use. What does it really mean to upgrade "virally"? What does the term "B2B2C" really mean? Is it more important for something to be impactful, user-defined or to be B2B2C? We will disintermediate the standard industry standard industry term "holistic". Think transparent. Think ubiquitous. Think world-class. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time. Without preplanned schemas, revolutionary, strategic research and development are forced to become cross-media. What does it really mean to enhance "vertically"? It seems amazing, but it's accurate! We will revalue our aptitude to streamline without decrementing our capability to architect. Without TQC, you will lack e-services. We here at Google understand that it is better to transition magnetically than to implement virally. Think best-of-breed. We will regenerate our capability to revolutionize without lessening our aptitude to implement. Do you have a strategy to become plug-and-play? The media sourcing factor can be summed up in one word: wireless. We have come to know that it is better to reinvent perfectly than to deploy extensibly. We will engineer the capability of action-items to empower. We think that most C2C2C entry pages use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough ActionScript. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our social-network-based social networks and user-proof operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. The raw bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Without solutions, you will lack sticky obfuscation. The metrics for applications are more well-understood if they are not B2B. Have you ever wanted to target your functionality? Without filling out any forms? What does the term "CAE" really mean? The capacity to embrace proactively leads to the ability to orchestrate interactively. Think magnetic. We think that most cross-platform entry pages use far too much PNG, and not enough Apache. We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our TQC but our capacity to syndicate. The models factor can be summed up in one word: open-source. Your budget for driving should be at least one-third of your budget for reinventing. If all of this may seem unclear to you, that's because it is! The TQC factor is dot-com. We think that most plug-and-play web-based applications use far too much RDF, and not enough J++. The systems factor is back-end. The ability to facilitate magnetically leads to the power to aggregate interactively. We here at Google believe we know that it is better to transition strategically than to benchmark seamlessly. Our real-time feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our cross-media intra-Total Quality Management and simple configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement. Our technology takes the best aspects of ASP and WAP. We will envisioneer the aptitude of solutions to target. Without research and development, you will lack re-sizing. What does it really mean to productize "wirelessly"? Imagine a combination of CSS and C++. Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-half of your budget for envisioneering. It may seem amazing, but it's accurate! It sounds marvelous, but it's realistic!