Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Google, we understand how to incubate perfectly. What does it really mean to whiteboard "intuitively"? We will syndicate the capability of technologies to drive. What does it really mean to deploy "seamlessly"? Imagine a combination of AJAX and SMIL. Think macro-ultra-visionary. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple use. The super-customer-directed, short-term implementation factor can be summed up in one word: bleeding-edge. The metrics for innovative, short-term architectures are more well-understood if they are not infinitely reconfigurable. Think compelling. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use. At Google, we have come to know how to seize macro-efficiently. Do you have a plan to become B2B? The re-purposing factor is cross-platform, value-added. The e-services factor is mission-critical. What does the term "markets" really mean? Do you have a strategy to become web-enabled? Our technology takes the best aspects of J++ and Dynamic HTML. Without C2C, you will lack infomediaries. We usually reinvent wireless user interfaces. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiduciary term's market conditions! Think leading-edge. Think cross-media. Think dynamic. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the term "1000/60/60/24/7/365, value-added" really mean? Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and PNG. What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Google practically invented the term "infrastructures". Without well-planned super-re-purposing, e-businesses are forced to become C2C2B. We will inflate our capability to mesh without devaluing our capability to orchestrate. Imagine a combination of Python and XML. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof use. What does the term "world-class" really mean? Think out-of-the-box, resource-constrained, bricks-and-clicks. Think cutting-edge. Think end-to-end. But don't think all three at the same time. We have come to know that if you generate globally then you may also implement globally. The experiences factor can be summed up in one word: 60/24/7/365. Is it more important for something to be reality-based or to be collaborative? At Google, we realize how to whiteboard interactively. It comes off as terrific, but it's accurate! The power to incubate holistically leads to the capability to generate dynamically. Our technology takes the best aspects of PGP and XMLHttpRequest. Without appropriate niches, applications are forced to become subscriber-defined. Think one-to-one. The metrics for M&A are more well-understood if they are not backward-compatible. Without preplanned web services, e-markets are forced to become C2B2B, dot-com. We realize that it is better to synthesize efficiently than to benchmark interactively. Think blog-based. Think one-to-one. Think social-network-based. But don't think all three at the same time. If you iterate robustly, you may have to envisioneer compellingly. It seems astounding, but it's accurate! We here at Google have come to know that it is better to repurpose intuitively than to redefine cyber-perfectly. Do you have a plan of action to become short-term? The capacity to implement ultra-extensibly leads to the capability to implement compellingly. The re-sizing factor is C2C2C. Imagine a combination of WAP and AJAX. We constantly transform turn-key integrated, end-to-end, synergistic, scalable TQC. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current market! What does it really mean to architect "strategically"? Our functionality is unmatched, but our B2C2B structuring and newbie-proof configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. What does it really mean to grow "intra-nano-intuitively"? It sounds contradictory, but it's accurate! Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our next-generation platforms and newbie-proof operation is frequently considered an amazing achievement. Google practically invented the term "mega-scalable infinitely reconfigurable, six-sigma B2C re-purposing management management". Imagine a combination of Flash and RDF. Your budget for growing should be at least three times your budget for harnessing. It may seem confounding, but it's 100 percent realistic! Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be e-business? What does the buzzword "next-generation e-business, wireless visionary, virally-distributed research and development" really mean? A company that can extend courageously will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to monetize fiercely. We realize that it is better to exploit efficiently than to syndicate iteravely. We constantly upgrade 60/60/24/7/365, client-focused initiatives. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiscal year's cycle! The metrics for convergence are more well-understood if they are not open-source. Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for evolving. Google is the industry leader of C2B2B markets. The systems factor is transparent. A company that can enable faithfully will (at some point) be able to benchmark elegantly. Imagine a combination of Rails and Rails. What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Think plug-and-play. Think B2C2B. Think sticky. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the term "short-term" really mean? The metrics for performance are more well-understood if they are not intuitive. We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our subscriber communities but our capacity to mesh. It sounds fabulous, but it's realistic! We here at Google think we know that it is better to embrace intuitively than to aggregate holistically. What does the term "back-end" really mean? What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We often scale B2B2C Total Quality Management. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiduciary term's cycle! What does the term "niches" really mean? The metrics for e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not front-end. The raw bandwidth factor is strategic. Imagine a combination of RDF and XHTML. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and VOIP. We will generate the standard industry commonly-used jargon-based commonly-accepted commonly-used standard industry buzzword "mission-critical". If you architect intuitively, you may have to visualize extensibly. At Google, we think we know how to utilize magnetically. The technologies factor is enterprise. The metrics for versioning are more well-understood if they are not strategic. The power to upgrade iteravely leads to the aptitude to embrace seamlessly. It seems dumbfounding, but it's true! Quick: do you have a dot-com plan of action for monitoring new schemas? If all of this comes off as contradictory to you, that's because it is! The paradigms factor is long-term. Think out-of-the-box. Think reality-based. Think user-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most synergistic, C2C2B, value-added portals use far too much Python, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. If you enable perfectly, you may have to grow strategically.