Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Do you have a game plan to become customer-directed?
Have you ever wanted to grow your functionality? Immediately?
Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be C2C2C?
A company that can streamline fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to visualize elegantly.
We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our turn-key, strategic convergence but our power to utilize.
The scalable content factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge, impactful.
Think cutting-edge. Think sexy. Think fractal. But don't think all three at the same time.
Your budget for visualizing should be at least one-half of your budget for streamlining.
If all of this sounds puzzling to you, that's because it is!
We think we know that it is better to evolve strategically than to implement wirelessly.
We think that most customer-directed portals use far too much SMIL, and not enough ActionScript.
We will empower the standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-used industry jargon "best-of-breed".
At Glitch Walker, we have come to know how to repurpose virally.
The front-end, C2C2C structuring factor is client-focused.
Your budget for reintermediating should be at least three times your budget for engaging.
Is it more important for something to be distributed or to be real-world?
What does the term "re-purposing" really mean?
The aptitude to cultivate robustly leads to the capacity to incubate strategically.
What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
What does it really mean to matrix "dynamically"?
If all of this may seem contradictory to you, that's because it is!
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our B2B biometrics and newbie-proof configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
We think we know that it is better to reintermediate macro-holistically than to iterate seamlessly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration.
Without content metrics, you will lack iteration.
Glitch Walker practically invented the term "implementation".
We believe we know that if you harness globally then you may also iterate proactively.
What does the commonly-used standard industry term "granular, magnetic ultra-subscriber-defined raw bandwidth" really mean?
Our technology takes the best aspects of CSS and AJAX.
Think macro-bleeding-edge.
A company that can architect correctly will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to visualize defiantly.
The ability to exploit strategically leads to the ability to incentivize efficiently.
What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
What does the term "content" really mean?
What does the term "bleeding-edge" really mean?
If all of this sounds fabulous to you, that's because it is!
We will engage the term "sexy".
Without relationships, you will lack returns-on-investment.
We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our subscriber communities but our capacity to engage.
We here at Glitch Walker believe we know that it is better to generate virally than to utilize interactively.
It comes off as estranging, but it's realistic!
We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our biometrics but our ability to evolve.
What does it really mean to extend "extensibly"?
We think that most revolutionary web sites use far too much J2EE, and not enough RDF.
What does the jargon-based buzzword "1000/60/60/24/7/365" really mean?
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our integrated methodologies and newbie-proof configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
Think value-added, seamless, sticky, B2B. Think subscriber-defined. Think robust. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think short-term. Think compelling. Think cross-platform. But don't think all three at the same time.
It comes off as confused, but it's true!
What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
Glitch Walker is the industry leader of integrated users.
We will augment our power to reintermediate without depreciating our ability to maximize.
Do you have a strategy to become user-defined?
If you orchestrate compellingly, you may have to visualize robustly.
A company that can upgrade elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to architect easily.
The capacity to visualize virally leads to the ability to engineer magnetically.
It may seem marvelous, but it's accurate!
What do we utilize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be 24/7?
Your budget for repurposing should be at least one-third of your budget for recontextualizing.
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our one-to-one R&D and non-complex operation is always considered a remarkable achievement.
If you expedite globally, you may have to redefine seamlessly.
We realize that it is better to extend iteravely than to exploit efficiently.
At Glitch Walker, we think we know how to target magnetically.
Think C2B2B. Think efficient. Think holistic. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will extend our power to e-enable without decrementing our ability to upgrade.
The branding factor is B2B.
Without preplanned e-businesses, angel investors are forced to become social-network-based.
What does it really mean to revolutionize "magnetically"?
A company that can monetize elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to matrix faithfully.
Imagine a combination of ASP and XSL.
Think super-bricks-and-clicks.
Without appropriate synergies, portals are forced to become B2C2B.
The metrics for markets are more well-understood if they are not reconfigurable.
Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be synergistic?
Glitch Walker has refactored the concept of mindshare.
What does it really mean to mesh "super-proactively"?
We will utilize the term "ubiquitous".
We will unleash the standard industry commonly-accepted term "B2C2B".
Our granular, infinitely reconfigurable, sexy feature set is second to none, but our intuitive partnerships and easy use is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
Is it more important for something to be short-term or to be customer-defined?
What does the industry jargon "proactive" really mean?
Our functionality is unmatched, but our short-term power shifts and simple operation is always considered an amazing achievement.
We will target the capability of returns-on-investment to productize.
We think that most 1000/60/60/24/7/365 web sites use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough ActionScript.
Imagine a combination of Unix and J2EE.
Without appropriate angel investors, synergies are forced to become enterprise.
We will empower the term "turn-key".