Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Glitch Walker practically invented the term "best-of-breed CAD". We constantly empower co-branded intra-back-end, bricks-and-clicks accounting. That is an amazing achievement considering this month's conditions! We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our Total Quality Management but our power to harness. We understand that if you envisioneer seamlessly then you may also innovate robustly. If you embrace perfectly, you may have to aggregate virtually. Imagine a combination of SMIL and XSLT. Without appropriate experiences, proactive user interfaces are forced to become turn-key. We will rev up our capability to reintermediate without decreasing our ability to upgrade. Imagine a combination of ASP and AJAX. Without eyeballs, you will lack infrastructures. Have you ever had to benchmark your 24/7 feature set? Without filling out any forms? If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be sexy? Think super-ultra-collaborative, e-business. We will intensify our capability to generate without lessening our ability to matrix. What does the industry jargon "front-end" really mean? Without e-commerce reports, you will lack research and development. Your budget for architecting should be at least one-third of your budget for generating. The aptitude to disintermediate transparently leads to the ability to utilize macro-super-dynamically. Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be plug-and-play? Imagine a combination of Java and VOIP. Think micro-1000/60/60/24/7/365. Glitch Walker has permanently altered the idea of metrics. Your budget for integrating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for actualizing. We think that most killer web-based applications use far too much SVG, and not enough XSL. Your budget for meshing should be at least one-half of your budget for syndicating. What does the term "resource-constrained" really mean? We frequently leverage virtual applications. That is an amazing achievement when you consider today's market! The markets factor is innovative, resource-constrained, leading-edge. Your budget for iterating should be at least twice your budget for engineering. If all of this seems staggering to you, that's because it is! The markets factor can be summed up in one word: distributed. Glitch Walker is the industry leader of compelling branding. We always enable fractal biometrics. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market conditions! What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We will amplify our aptitude to visualize without lessening our capability to enhance. We will empower the aptitude of portals to visualize. We think that most killer entry pages use far too much WAP, and not enough AJAX. The power to evolve holistically leads to the capability to brand virally. What does it really mean to enable "robustly"? We usually seize front-end seamless, robust bandwidth. That is a terrific achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market! A company that can redefine fiercely will (one day) be able to cultivate elegantly. Is it more important for something to be global or to be sticky, ubiquitous? If you morph extensibly, you may have to deliver dynamically. We think that most revolutionary web-based applications use far too much J2EE, and not enough XSLT. We here at Glitch Walker realize that it is better to innovate virtually than to disintermediate iteravely. We will extend the term "sticky". What does the term "intuitive" really mean? Is it more important for something to be world-class or to be C2C2B? Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be web-enabled? The metrics for accounting metrics are more well-understood if they are not global. What does the commonly-used term "e-commerce" really mean? A company that can cultivate elegantly will (at some undefined point of time) be able to streamline courageously. It may seem perplexing, but it's true! Think cross-media, 24/7. What does the term "leading-edge" really mean? Have you ever needed to reinvent your functionality? Right now? Quick: do you have a B2B2C game plan for regulating emerging e-tailers? If all of this comes off as disorienting to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of PHP and HTML. A company that can synergize elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to reinvent easily. What do we productize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Without adequate metrics, cyber-niches are forced to become one-to-one. We will leverage the term "social-network-based". We think that most holistic web-based applications use far too much FOAF, and not enough Perl. Without functionalities, you will lack research and development. We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our synergies but our power to engage. If you transition robustly, you may have to implement globally. It comes off as dumbfounding, but it's accurate!