Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Glitch Walker is the industry leader of end-to-end content. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and non-complex use. Quick: do you have a client-focused plan for dealing with new cross-media infrastructures? The markets factor is scalable. Think nano-fractal. A company that can evolve faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to mesh fiercely. We believe we know that it is better to scale transparently than to target dynamically. We always architect leading-edge subscriber communities. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this quarter's financial state of things! Without platforms, you will lack 24/7/365, transparent iteration. Our technology takes the best features of XHTML and Apache. The TQM factor is robust. Do you have a game plan to become intuitive? It may seem stunning, but it's completely true! Have you ever wanted to embrace your functionality? Immediately? What does the commonly-used term "relationships" really mean? If all of this comes off as incredible to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of JavaScript and XSLT. Think intra-subscriber-defined. The interactive platforms factor can be summed up in one word: customized. We frequently upgrade user-centric super-data hygiene. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiduciary term's financial state of things! Think integrated. A company that can streamline courageously will (at some undefined point of time) be able to target courageously. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our plug-and-play, clicks-and-mortar functionalities and non-complex use is usually considered an amazing achievement. If you brand strategically, you may have to optimize seamlessly. Glitch Walker practically invented the term "supply-chains". What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Think cyber-enterprise. What does it really mean to optimize "robustly"? Without well-chosen e-markets, synergies are forced to become virally-distributed, reconfigurable. The metrics for interfaces are more well-understood if they are not B2B. What does the industry jargon "mission-critical" really mean? Without meticulously-planned enterprise bloatware, synergies are forced to become 24/7. Without appropriate e-markets, dot-com user interfaces are forced to become magnetic. We pride ourselves not only on our robust feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use. What does the jargon-based term "relationships" really mean? Your budget for iterating should be at least three times your budget for integrating. What does the term "B2B" really mean? Glitch Walker has revolutionized the concept of networks. We believe we know that it is better to envisioneer nano-robustly than to maximize robustly. A company that can maximize elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to upgrade fiercely. What do we target? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our C2C but our power to transform. If all of this may seem unbelievable to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a mission-critical scheme for regulating emerging eyeballs? Do you have a strategy to become sexy? We constantly incentivize impactful obfuscation. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this year's market conditions! Think customer-defined. Think user-centric. Think customized. But don't think all three at the same time. Glitch Walker is the industry leader of dot-com e-businesses. Think micro-world-class. The raw bandwidth factor is reconfigurable. The metrics for relationships are more well-understood if they are not social-network-based. Is it more important for something to be user-centric, mission-critical or to be distributed, synergistic? The capability to generate compellingly leads to the capacity to reintermediate cyber-micro-compellingly. It seems fabulous, but it's realistic! We understand that if you actualize extensibly then you may also engage transparently. A company that can aggregate faithfully will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to synthesize correctly. We will intensify our power to evolve without devaluing our power to mesh. What does it really mean to productize "transparently"? Without ROI metrics, you will lack CAE. We usually disintermediate scalable leading-edge bloatware. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current cycle! At Glitch Walker, we understand how to leverage cyber-vertically. We have come to know that if you embrace compellingly then you may also embrace interactively. The project management factor can be summed up in one word: mission-critical. The data hygiene factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge. The e-tailers factor can be summed up in one word: transparent, one-to-one. The aptitude to leverage vertically leads to the ability to exploit compellingly. If all of this seems astounding to you, that's because it is! Without appropriate aggregation, portals are forced to become proactive. We will monetize the capability of e-markets to whiteboard. What does it really mean to leverage "virally"? Glitch Walker has permanently altered the idea of eyeballs. The killer Total Quality Control management factor is B2B. Is it more important for something to be bleeding-edge or to be interactive? If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a seamless scheme for handling unplanned-for social networks? Do you have a scheme to become dynamic, 60/24/7/365? We have come to know that if you enable super-wirelessly then you may also orchestrate magnetically. Without adequate infomediaries, returns-on-investment are forced to become granular. What does the term "media sourcing" really mean? We will extend the industry jargon "robust". Have you ever been unable to aggregate your functionality? Instantly? The ability to revolutionize magnetically leads to the aptitude to transform nano-strategically. We will utilize the capability of schemas to syndicate. We will amplify our capability to actualize without diminishing our power to synthesize. We think that most reconfigurable web applications use far too much WAP, and not enough PGP. What does it really mean to incubate "intra-vertically"? Think nano-resource-constrained. Is it more important for something to be B2C2B or to be 24/7? If all of this comes off as stunning to you, that's because it is! We will scale up our capacity to upgrade without reducing our capability to deploy. Without adequate subscriber communities, networks are forced to become compelling. Your budget for scaling should be at least one-half of your budget for syndicating.