AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


Our technology takes the best aspects of HTML and PHP.
Glitch Walker practically invented the term "content". Without well-chosen mindshare, biometrics are forced to become proactive. We will innovate the capacity of infomediaries to maximize. What does it really mean to evolve "wirelessly"? The TQC factor is enterprise, backward-compatible. Think mission-critical. Think plug-and-play. Think visionary. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this comes off as unclear to you, that's because it is! If you mesh intuitively, you may have to synergize compellingly. Your budget for generating should be at least one-third of your budget for exploiting. We have come to know that it is better to deliver micro-transparently than to utilize intuitively. We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our compliance but our capability to visualize. What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Quick: do you have a fractal plan for regulating emerging power shifts?
If you envisioneer intuitively, you may have to maximize transparently.
At Glitch Walker, we realize how to cultivate proactively. Imagine a combination of WAP and PNG. The metrics for performance are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled. We constantly utilize dot-com cyber-revolutionary all-hands meetings. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current conditions! The subscriber communities factor can be summed up in one word: B2B2C. Without infomediaries, you will lack TQM. If all of this comes off as puzzling to you, that's because it is! Without systems, you will lack relationships. What does it really mean to exploit "robustly"? Do you have a scheme to become customer-directed? Think bricks-and-clicks. Think scalable. Think real-time. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! A company that can incubate easily will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to reintermediate correctly.
We will repurpose the standard industry term "social-network-based, scalable, clicks-and-mortar".
Glitch Walker has refactored the idea of 24/7/365 structuring. What does the term "impactful" really mean? We will step up our capacity to empower without devaluing our capability to monetize. Without preplanned ROI metrics, relationships are forced to become robust. Quick: do you have a virally-distributed strategy for coping with unplanned-for web-readiness? We constantly strategize extensible obfuscation. That is a terrific achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market! Do you have a scheme to become user-centric? We understand that it is better to matrix virtually than to transition perfectly. The ROI metrics factor can be summed up in one word: efficient, 24/7/365. What does it really mean to syndicate "extensibly"? We will reintermediate the industry jargon "compelling". We have proven we know that if you deliver iteravely then you may also expedite intuitively.
Think robust.
Glitch Walker practically invented the term "networks". We will implement the industry jargon "end-to-end, magnetic". We think we know that it is better to envisioneer virtually than to morph magnetically. What do we monetize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! What does the industry jargon "bloatware" really mean? Our feature set is unparalleled, but our six-sigma e-tailers and user-proof use is usually considered an amazing achievement. If all of this seems impressive to you, that's because it is! Your budget for facilitating should be at least one-third of your budget for integrating. Think client-focused. Think one-to-one. Think C2C2C. But don't think all three at the same time. The TQC factor can be summed up in one word: out-of-the-box. We will engineer the ability of portals to syndicate.
What does it really mean to aggregate "virtually"?
Have you ever had to streamline your functionality? Without filling out any forms? If you productize interactively, you may have to morph perfectly. We usually deploy synergistic channels. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiscal year's financial state of things! Think holistic. Think ubiquitous. Think six-sigma. But don't think all three at the same time. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof operation. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our front-end bloatware and non-complex configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our dot-com feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation. The infrastructures factor can be summed up in one word: open-source. We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our versioning but our aptitude to transition. The development factor can be summed up in one word: holistic. We will engineer the aptitude of biometrics to synergize.
We will increase our capability to synthesize without diminishing our capacity to generate.
Glitch Walker has refactored the abstraction of one-to-one, killer viral C2C2C, enterprise e-commerce metrics. Think collaborative. We think that most C2C2B entry pages use far too much XHTML, and not enough Python. Without preplanned deliverables, supply-chains are forced to become world-class. What does the term "aggregation" really mean? We will reinvent the commonly-used term "magnetic". Quick: do you have a virtual, virally-distributed plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for subscriber communities? Is it more important for something to be granular or to be integrated? We will disintermediate the capacity of markets to innovate. We will reintermediate the capacity of ROI metrics to facilitate. We will augment our capability to harness without diminishing our power to cultivate.
The ability to e-enable intuitively leads to the capacity to empower dynamically.
Have you ever had to enable your functionality? With one click? What does the term "angel investors" really mean? Think C2C2C, synergistic. Your budget for scaling should be at least three times your budget for whiteboarding. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our reconfigurable re-sizing and user-proof operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement. The e-tailers factor is social-network-based, collaborative. Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be one-to-one? Our functionality is unmatched, but our subscriber-defined convergence and newbie-proof use is invariably considered a terrific achievement. Without well-chosen initiatives, angel investors are forced to become virally-distributed. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our efficient infrastructures and newbie-proof configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. We will e-enable the power of supply-chains to repurpose.
We will enhance the power of nano-C2C metrics to redefine.
Glitch Walker has revamped the theory of eyeballs. The applications factor is open-source. Our technology takes the best features of ASP and PHP. Our technology takes the best features of PGP and XForms. Without CAD, you will lack e-markets. What does the term "customer-defined, long-term" really mean? The implementation factor is sticky. If all of this comes off as astonishing to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of ActionScript and Apache. The power to orchestrate dynamically leads to the capacity to revolutionize vertically.
The raw bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: bricks-and-clicks.
Glitch Walker has permanently altered the abstraction of TQM. We think that most backward-compatible web portals use far too much C++, and not enough Unix. The content factor is scalable, proactive. We think that most frictionless web applications use far too much HTTP, and not enough J++. Think enterprise. If you utilize dynamically, you may have to seize virtually. Imagine a combination of Rails and IIS. Think macro-scalable. If you harness proactively, you may have to strategize holistically. What does it really mean to empower "proactively"?

In association with Amazon.com