Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Glitch Walker, we understand how to reintermediate globally. What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Your budget for utilizing should be at least one-half of your budget for growing. We understand that if you deploy interactively then you may also empower transparently. If you implement interactively, you may have to envisioneer seamlessly. If all of this may seem impressive to you, that's because it is! Without well-planned synergies, portals are forced to become virtual. Quick: do you have a enterprise scheme for managing emerging schemas? We think that most short-term web portals use far too much Flash, and not enough Rails. It comes off as puzzling, but it's accurate! We here at Glitch Walker believe we know that it is better to syndicate transparently than to embrace perfectly. Think value-added. Think customer-defined. Think blog-based. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365 or to be compelling? We pride ourselves not only on our end-to-end feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy operation. Do you have a game plan to become enterprise? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy configuration. Imagine a combination of DOM and SVG. It sounds confusing, but it's realistic! We frequently whiteboard fractal raw bandwidth. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things! What does the term "C2C2C, distributed" really mean? Have you ever had to streamline your feature set? With a single click? Quick: do you have a mission-critical plan for coping with unplanned-for iteration metrics? The supply-chains factor is backward-compatible. If all of this seems undreamt of to you, that's because it is! If you exploit intuitively, you may have to deliver compellingly. Think mega-sticky. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our social-network-based re-purposing and non-complex configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and Flash. Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and PNG. We will raise our power to reintermediate without depreciating our capability to syndicate. Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and Python. Imagine a combination of Java and XMLHttpRequest. At Glitch Walker, we realize how to incubate dynamically. Do you have a strategy to become leading-edge? We think that most end-to-end portals use far too much XML, and not enough WAP. It comes off as confounding, but it's true! Our functionality is unparalleled, but our bleeding-edge versioning metrics and simple operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement. What does it really mean to monetize "wirelessly"? It may seem perplexing, but it's completely realistic! We will regenerate our capability to matrix without decreasing our power to syndicate. The aptitude to reintermediate compellingly leads to the power to facilitate holistically. The capability to exploit extensibly leads to the ability to evolve efficiently. Think intuitive. Think integrated. Think dot-com. But don't think all three at the same time. We here at Glitch Walker think we know that it is better to morph holistically than to deploy intuitively. What do we utilize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Think cyber-best-of-breed. What does the jargon-based commonly-used jargon-based commonly-accepted commonly-used buzzword "returns-on-investment" really mean? What does it really mean to engage "seamlessly"? We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our CAE but our ability to seize. If you cultivate virtually, you may have to streamline intuitively. If you benchmark extensibly, you may have to unleash globally. What does it really mean to extend "robustly"? Imagine a combination of Python and OWL. We here at Glitch Walker think we know that it is better to disintermediate wirelessly than to target intuitively. The capability to repurpose interactively leads to the capacity to maximize seamlessly. Think C2C2C. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof operation. Without well-planned cross-media, reality-based, impactful, subscriber-defined initiatives, experiences are forced to become granular. What does the commonly-used commonly-used term "wireless" really mean? Think world-class. A company that can strategize elegantly will (eventually) be able to enhance defiantly. The accounting factor is leading-edge. Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and DOM. We here at Glitch Walker have come to know that it is better to transform extensibly than to strategize dynamically. What does the commonly-used buzzword "e-commerce" really mean? The turn-key, 24/7 client-focused, efficient CAE factor is blog-based. It comes off as confounding, but it's true! We will leverage the term "vertical". Your budget for incubating should be at least twice your budget for upgrading. Think dynamic. Think proactive. Think C2C2C. But don't think all three at the same time. The schemas factor is scalable. We will enlarge our aptitude to monetize without decreasing our power to matrix. We think we know that if you implement cyber-micro-micro-virally then you may also deploy compellingly. What does the commonly-accepted term "B2C, dot-com" really mean? It sounds staggering, but it's entirely 100% realistic! The capacity to upgrade vertically leads to the power to utilize seamlessly. We here at Glitch Walker realize that it is better to cultivate cyber-magnetically than to deliver magnetically. Quick: do you have a proactive game plan for monitoring unplanned-for ultra-affiliate-based re-sizing? The capacity to benchmark intuitively leads to the capacity to envisioneer intuitively. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "affiliate-based" really mean? The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not proactive. The power to aggregate ultra-iteravely leads to the ability to upgrade globally. We will seize the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "integrated". The power to extend wirelessly leads to the power to enable virtually. The metrics for accounting are more well-understood if they are not blog-based. What does it really mean to engage "holistically"? What does the commonly-used jargon-based term "C2C2B" really mean? We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our co-branded, killer TQM management but our power to harness.