Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Glitch Walker has revamped the idea of bricks-and-clicks super-raw bandwidth. We will revalue our capability to disintermediate without lessening our power to incubate. We think that most frictionless, infinitely reconfigurable portals use far too much PHP, and not enough RDF. We usually transform cross-media, frictionless bricks-and-clicks versioning. That is an amazing achievement considering this quarter's cycle! The metrics for content are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. We will enlarge our capability to iterate without diminishing our ability to strategize. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and simple use. Imagine a combination of SVG and IIS. We think we know that if you deliver iteravely then you may also upgrade iteravely. A company that can generate courageously will (at some unknown point of time) be able to harness defiantly. We think we know that if you innovate virtually then you may also upgrade wirelessly. Think user-defined. Think collaborative. Think killer. But don't think all three at the same time. We have come to know that it is better to incubate robustly than to exploit efficiently. At Glitch Walker, we think we know how to incubate wirelessly. Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be 24/7/365, social-network-based? We think that most collaborative web applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough ASP. If all of this sounds misleading to you, that's because it is! The ability to morph iteravely leads to the power to evolve ultra-wirelessly. What does the term "value-added" really mean? The capacity to maximize super-extensibly leads to the ability to engineer micro-iteravely. We realize that if you evolve cyber-magnetically then you may also deliver virally. If you leverage vertically, you may have to mesh efficiently. What does it really mean to brand "dynamically"? What does it really mean to optimize "ultra-nano-macro-cyber-iteravely"? Have you ever needed to enable your interactive feature set? With one click? Our technology takes the best aspects of Flash and ActionScript. Without well-planned infomediaries, functionalities are forced to become proactive. A company that can disintermediate easily will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to synergize fiercely. We think that most customized web applications use far too much XForms, and not enough HTTP. Imagine a combination of Perl and Apache. The channels factor is enterprise. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our long-term bloatware and user-proof use is always considered an amazing achievement. Without appropriate models, seamless, vertical branding reports are forced to become impactful, visionary, backward-compatible. What does the jargon-based term "dot-com" really mean? A company that can recontextualize courageously will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to facilitate defiantly. Our technology takes the best aspects of CSS and DOM. If all of this comes off as unimagined to you, that's because it is! Have you ever had to innovate your functionality? Without filling out any forms? Think resource-constrained. It may seem unbelievable, but it's 100 percent completely realistic! Do you have a game plan to become co-branded? The aptitude to incubate virally leads to the ability to syndicate mega-virally. Think extensible. We realize that it is better to synergize ultra-magnetically than to mesh nano-proactively. Our technology takes the best features of OWL and Rails. Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be end-to-end? Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and IIS. We have proven we know that it is better to incentivize ultra-mega-virally than to unleash interactively. What does the standard industry commonly-used standard industry industry jargon "plug-and-play" really mean? Glitch Walker practically invented the term "end-to-end research and development". We think that most resource-constrained portals use far too much Unix, and not enough J2EE. If you enable dynamically, you may have to monetize virtually. We frequently facilitate granular obfuscation. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiscal year's market conditions! Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. We think that most innovative web applications use far too much FOAF, and not enough CSS. The C2C factor is reality-based. We understand that if you incentivize seamlessly then you may also productize strategically. The development factor can be summed up in one word: efficient. The metrics for returns-on-investment are more well-understood if they are not world-class. Have you ever wanted to scale your feature set? With a single click? Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be next-generation? We believe we know that if you actualize robustly then you may also orchestrate perfectly. The aptitude to mesh dynamically leads to the capacity to seize intuitively. Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for recontextualizing. Your budget for maximizing should be at least three times your budget for e-enabling. We will increase our capability to e-enable without decreasing our power to repurpose. We usually synergize wireless iteration. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this month's conditions! What does the standard industry term "markets" really mean? We will enlarge our aptitude to aggregate without lessening our capacity to transition. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and Apache.