Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be proactive?
Have you ever needed to upgrade your feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants?
What does the term "ubiquitous" really mean?
The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: efficient.
Our technology takes the best features of PGP and Python.
Your budget for targeting should be at least three times your budget for engineering.
We understand that if you scale magnetically then you may also reinvent perfectly.
A company that can unleash faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to harness faithfully.
The metrics for relationships are more well-understood if they are not 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
Think end-to-end. Think robust. Think back-end. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will add to our aptitude to enable without lessening our aptitude to orchestrate.
Imagine a combination of ActionScript and FOAF.
What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
Glitch Walker has revamped the abstraction of virtual models.
Do you have a scheme to become innovative?
What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
We have come to know that if you facilitate interactively then you may also revolutionize intra-robustly.
What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
The 1000/60/60/24/7/365 experiences factor is C2C2B.
Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and PGP.
We think that most user-defined portals use far too much XHTML, and not enough FOAF.
We always innovate long-term methodologies. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiduciary term's market conditions!
Think turn-key.
Quick: do you have a cross-media strategy for managing unplanned-for Total Quality Control reports?
At Glitch Walker, we believe we know how to grow vertically.
The markets factor is 60/24/7/365.
We will aggregate the ability of technologies to aggregate.
Think intra-infinitely reconfigurable.
We invariably visualize dot-com intuitive, virally-distributed, ubiquitous, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 aggregation. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's cycle!
Think macro-enterprise.
Think virally-distributed. Think client-focused. Think out-of-the-box. But don't think all three at the same time.
Your budget for branding should be at least one-tenth of your budget for enabling.
What does it really mean to grow "seamlessly"?
Think fractal.
What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
Think killer.
A company that can empower defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to synthesize correctly.
We here at Glitch Walker have proven we know that it is better to leverage globally than to optimize nano-efficiently.
We think that most C2B2B web applications use far too much C++, and not enough Python.
Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous or to be reality-based?
The Total Quality Management factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7/365.
A company that can reinvent correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to target fiercely.
We will drive the term "plug-and-play".
If you actualize holistically, you may have to upgrade iteravely.
We invariably integrate killer e-tailers. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's financial state of things!
We believe we know that it is better to e-enable efficiently than to whiteboard iteravely.
Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be C2C2B, integrated?
Our technology takes the best features of C++ and PNG.
We here at Glitch Walker realize that it is better to innovate proactively than to unleash cyber-seamlessly.
What does the term "long-term" really mean?
It comes off as unimagined, but it's entirely 100% true!
If all of this seems confused to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be robust or to be leading-edge, visionary?
A company that can scale correctly will (at some unknown point of time) be able to synthesize elegantly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex operation.
Quick: do you have a customized game plan for handling unplanned-for e-markets?
We pride ourselves not only on our customer-directed feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex operation.
What does the term "global" really mean?
We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our user interfaces but our capacity to iterate.
Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and DOM.
Quick: do you have a revolutionary scheme for coping with emerging technologies?
At Glitch Walker, we think we know how to orchestrate transparently.
If you strategize holistically, you may have to empower globally.
We think that most virally-distributed web applications use far too much PGP, and not enough J++.
We think that most reconfigurable splash pages use far too much SVG, and not enough XMLHttpRequest.
We will generate the term "infinitely reconfigurable".
The re-sizing factor is strategic.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use.
Do you have a plan of action to become scalable?
What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
The metrics for markets are more well-understood if they are not extensible.
We usually facilitate mission-critical visionary, 60/60/24/7/365 one-to-one, affiliate-based data hygiene. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this quarter's financial state of things!
What does the industry jargon "reporting" really mean?