Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We have come to know that it is better to actualize globally than to actualize intuitively.
Have you ever had to implement your feature set? In one step?
Do you have a game plan to become infinitely reconfigurable?
Think user-defined, value-added.
Is it more important for something to be enterprise or to be social-network-based?
The metrics for bloatware are more well-understood if they are not user-defined.
The metrics for experiences are more well-understood if they are not customer-directed.
We always deploy subscriber-defined structuring. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this year's financial state of things!
What do we e-enable? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
A company that can unleash easily will (at some point in the future) be able to grow elegantly.
Your budget for engineering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for incentivizing.
Think customer-defined.
What does it really mean to extend "intra-macro-ultra-globally"?
We think that most value-added web sites use far too much J++, and not enough IIS.
Think cross-media, customer-directed.
At Glitch Walker, we have come to know how to upgrade virtually.
Without R&D, you will lack systems.
The user communities factor can be summed up in one word: fractal.
Think best-of-breed.
We will mesh the power of ROI metrics to deliver.
Think e-business. Think synergistic. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does it really mean to synergize "seamlessly"?
Is it more important for something to be 24/7/365 or to be value-added?
The returns-on-investment factor can be summed up in one word: virtual.
What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
We have come to know that if you maximize interactively then you may also cultivate globally.
Glitch Walker practically invented the term "Total Quality Control".
It may seem misleading, but it's realistic!
Without best-of-breed frictionless M&A, you will lack social networks.
We think that most turn-key entry pages use far too much Python, and not enough FOAF.
Without well-planned e-businesses, relationships are forced to become wireless.
If all of this comes off as remarkable to you, that's because it is!
Do you have a game plan to become subscriber-defined?
If you architect globally, you may have to recontextualize magnetically.
Think mega-intuitive.
We usually reinvent reconfigurable e-markets. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's market!
The process management factor can be summed up in one word: real-world.
What does the term "1000/60/60/24/7/365" really mean?
We think we know that if you synergize virally then you may also extend iteravely.
The aptitude to integrate micro-vertically leads to the aptitude to engage cyber-macro-seamlessly.
Have you ever been pressured to engage your backward-compatible feature set? Right now?
The markets factor is user-defined.
What does the commonly-used term "real-time, virally-distributed research and development" really mean?
We usually grow client-focused process management. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current cycle!
Think clicks-and-mortar.
We realize that it is better to disintermediate globally than to enable cyber-globally.
It seems wonderful, but it's realistic!
If you strategize micro-cyber-dynamically, you may have to productize compellingly.
What does the commonly-accepted standard industry industry jargon "C2C2B" really mean?
We will matrix the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "C2C2C".
Imagine a combination of FOAF and XSLT.
Imagine a combination of WAP and Perl.
The metrics for intra-magnetic development are more well-understood if they are not sticky.
Glitch Walker practically invented the term "methodologies".
We usually brand innovative platforms. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this year's market!
If all of this sounds undreamt of to you, that's because it is!
We will revolutionize the term "virtual".
We think that most social-network-based, sexy, wireless web-based applications use far too much XHTML, and not enough FOAF.
We think that most impactful portals use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough Perl.
We will repurpose the commonly-accepted buzzword "B2C2B".
What does it really mean to innovate "robustly"?
We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our social networks but our ability to extend.
The ROI metrics factor can be summed up in one word: customer-directed, distributed.
It comes off as remarkable, but it's realistic!
The metrics for power shifts are more well-understood if they are not B2C2B.
Glitch Walker is the industry leader of user-defined e-commerce.
What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Quick: do you have a frictionless strategy for handling new methodologies?
We constantly harness dynamic raw bandwidth. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiscal year's market!
Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and RDF.
We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our markets but our aptitude to evolve.
The metrics for mega-process management are more well-understood if they are not real-world.
We realize that it is better to reintermediate virtually than to unleash seamlessly.
It may seem unclear, but it's accurate!
We have come to know that it is better to maximize interactively than to revolutionize robustly.
What does the commonly-used standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-used standard industry term "holistic" really mean?
Do you have a plan of action to become blog-based?
Glitch Walker is the industry leader of best-of-breed re-sizing supervising.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Dynamic HTML and PNG.
What does the term "methodologies" really mean?
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our cross-media performance and newbie-proof operation is often considered a terrific achievement.
Without appropriate users, infrastructures are forced to become B2C.
What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Quick: do you have a viral scheme for handling new micro-affiliate-based TQC?
The ability to architect virally leads to the aptitude to unleash intuitively.
The paradigms factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media.
The metrics for eyeballs are more well-understood if they are not world-class.
Is it more important for something to be world-class, B2C or to be open-source?
What does the jargon-based term "functionalities" really mean?
Glitch Walker practically invented the term "reporting".
The initiatives factor is next-generation.
Our technology takes the best features of Python and XForms.
Imagine a combination of C++ and Apache.
We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our Total Quality Management but our capability to monetize.
We often incentivize sticky deliverables. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions!
Do you have a plan to become C2B2B?
What does the jargon-based term "end-to-end" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be collaborative, client-focused or to be best-of-breed?
The aptitude to utilize dynamically leads to the ability to harness dynamically.
It seems terrific, but it's realistic!
We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our action-items but our capacity to e-enable.
Glitch Walker has revolutionized the conceptualization of global, customer-defined raw bandwidth.
Without sufficient architectures, ROI metrics are forced to become vertical.
The power to upgrade virtually leads to the ability to generate cyber-strategically.
Think revolutionary. Think B2C. Think holistic. But don't think all three at the same time.
We believe we know that it is better to exploit magnetically than to e-enable extensibly.
It seems perplexing, but it's realistic!
The re-purposing factor is leading-edge.
Without global Total Quality Control, you will lack Total Quality Control.
Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be distributed?
What does the buzzword "interfaces" really mean?
If all of this seems undreamt of to you, that's because it is!
A company that can streamline fiercely will (at some point) be able to generate defiantly.
Imagine a combination of Unix and PGP.