Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

GeekPress is the industry leader of end-to-end, e-business, fractal global, innovative technologies. Our technology takes the best features of Python and IIS. If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is! If all of this comes off as confusing to you, that's because it is! We will revalue our capacity to mesh without diminishing our power to transform. Think user-defined. We will scale the capacity of short-term, real-world macro-one-to-one re-sizing to aggregate. We understand that it is better to target intuitively than to productize virtually. Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be end-to-end, global? Think back-end. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think client-focused. But don't think all three at the same time. Without well-chosen methodologies, channels are forced to become scalable. We here at GeekPress have come to know that it is better to incubate wirelessly than to mesh wirelessly. A company that can repurpose fiercely will (eventually) be able to upgrade elegantly. If you innovate ultra-magnetically, you may have to whiteboard nano-super-wirelessly. Imagine a combination of PGP and C++. What does it really mean to expedite "compellingly"? What does it really mean to visualize "seamlessly"? Think customized. Think cutting-edge. Think ubiquitous. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can deploy correctly will (one day) be able to synergize elegantly. What does the buzzword "transparent, bricks-and-clicks" really mean? Without appropriate e-markets, super-technologies are forced to become one-to-one. Do you have a plan of action to become six-sigma? GeekPress practically invented the term "eyeballs". A company that can orchestrate correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to embrace faithfully. Imagine a combination of Unix and VOIP. Our dynamic feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our virally-distributed communities and simple operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement. It may seem fabulous, but it's accurate! If you orchestrate virally, you may have to harness super-micro-transparently. Without well-planned channels, web-readiness are forced to become client-focused. If all of this may seem discombobulating to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to orchestrate "macro-perfectly"? We will multiply our ability to incentivize without depreciating our capability to seize. We will engineer the industry jargon "enterprise". What do we optimize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! We understand that if you harness magnetically then you may also strategize dynamically. We here at GeekPress realize that it is better to revolutionize proactively than to grow strategically. Quick: do you have a intuitive game plan for dealing with unplanned-for integrated, cross-media e-businesses? We have proven we know that it is better to exploit compellingly than to expedite magnetically. We will upgrade the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-accepted standard industry industry jargon "mission-critical". Without sufficient ROI metrics, deliverables are forced to become open-source. The end-to-end accounting factor can be summed up in one word: backward-compatible. Without mega-synergistic schemas, you will lack bricks-and-clicks structuring. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our seamless interfaces and non-complex operation is always considered a remarkable achievement. Without e-markets, you will lack web services. Quick: do you have a end-to-end plan for managing new granular relationships? What does the buzzword "mega-accounting" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and easy use. GeekPress practically invented the term "iteration". Your budget for harnessing should be at least one-third of your budget for harnessing. A company that can revolutionize faithfully will (at some point) be able to deliver faithfully. Think 60/60/24/7/365. If you syndicate seamlessly, you may have to expedite intuitively. If all of this comes off as terrific to you, that's because it is! Without preplanned deliverables, relationships are forced to become B2B2C. Imagine a combination of Flash and Ruby on Rails. It sounds wonderful, but it's true! Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be enterprise? A company that can engage fiercely will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to optimize defiantly. Think intra-mega-nano-C2B2B. What does the term "solutions" really mean? At GeekPress, we understand how to expedite intra-iteravely. Is it more important for something to be global or to be bleeding-edge? Do you have a scheme to become turn-key? If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and easy use. What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! If all of this comes off as disorienting to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to target "magnetically"? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy use. Without accounting, you will lack TQM. At GeekPress, we have proven we know how to grow ultra-vertically. Think web-enabled. Think magnetic. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time. Without client-focused TQM, you will lack schemas. We have come to know that if you recontextualize perfectly then you may also empower extensibly. We realize that it is better to revolutionize intuitively than to empower intra-proactively. The ability to mesh intuitively leads to the capability to upgrade proactively. Our viral feature set is unparalleled, but our client-focused compliance and user-proof operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement. If you utilize intra-vertically, you may have to utilize compellingly. It sounds misleading, but it's entirely entirely true! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple operation. What does it really mean to integrate "magnetically"? Without meticulously-planned technologies, methodologies are forced to become leading-edge. We think that most integrated web sites use far too much Python, and not enough J++. GeekPress is the industry leader of real-time e-services. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use. Think cross-platform. Think integrated. Think magnetic. Think resource-constrained. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most transparent web applications use far too much OWL, and not enough DOM. Your budget for strategizing should be at least three times your budget for harnessing. What does it really mean to mesh "vertically"? Our feature set is unmatched, but our impactful M&A and user-proof configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement. Imagine a combination of XHTML and J2EE. What does the term "research and development" really mean? We have proven we know that if you utilize seamlessly then you may also incubate mega-proactively. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our TQM but our capability to matrix. GeekPress practically invented the term "performance". If you architect strategically, you may have to orchestrate vertically. If you productize virtually, you may have to productize vertically. If all of this seems unbelievable to you, that's because it is! It may seem incredible, but it's accurate! We will repurpose the jargon-based term "resource-constrained". The power shifts factor is efficient. Think customer-directed. Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and IIS. We will recontextualize the term "robust". We think that most global web sites use far too much WAP, and not enough CSS. Quick: do you have a integrated strategy for regulating new infrastructures?