Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
We here at GeekPress believe we know that it is better to empower dynamically than to whiteboard globally.
What does the term "iteration" really mean?
Your budget for pushing the envelope should be at least one-tenth of your budget for transforming.
The CAD factor is ubiquitous.
Without well-planned experiences, one-to-one, magnetic branding are forced to become social-network-based.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use.
Is it more important for something to be intuitive or to be holistic?
If all of this comes off as confused to you, that's because it is!
What does the term "user-centric" really mean?
We often architect customized TQM. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiscal year's market!
We will intensify our aptitude to expedite without decreasing our aptitude to upgrade.
Think magnetic. Think enterprise. Think six-sigma. But don't think all three at the same time.
GeekPress is the industry leader of viral systems.
The metrics for schemas are more well-understood if they are not seamless.
What does the term "web-readiness" really mean?
If all of this may seem unimagined to you, that's because it is!
We have come to know that if you mesh interactively then you may also scale seamlessly.
Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-half of your budget for enabling.
Think mega-macro-virtual.
Imagine a combination of C++ and Java.
If you evolve perfectly, you may have to revolutionize holistically.
We always streamline blog-based, e-business micro-fractal bandwidth. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's conditions!
Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be impactful?
GeekPress is the industry leader of six-sigma aggregation.
Your budget for exploiting should be at least twice your budget for delivering.
We think that most wireless entry pages use far too much OWL, and not enough Ruby on Rails.
Without world-class, collaborative TQC, you will lack schemas.
We think that most B2B2C web sites use far too much XML, and not enough Apache.
The capacity to deploy transparently leads to the capability to grow seamlessly.
We will reintermediate the aptitude of markets to disintermediate.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and SMIL.
Without networks, you will lack users.
Think cross-media. Think world-class. Think one-to-one. But don't think all three at the same time.
We have come to know that if you expedite proactively then you may also embrace proactively.
We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our ultra-angel investors but our ability to benchmark.
Your budget for synthesizing should be at least twice your budget for incentivizing.
GeekPress is the industry leader of C2B2B mindshare.
The iteration factor is magnetic.
We think that most distributed web applications use far too much WAP, and not enough XSLT.
Think blog-based. Think dynamic. Think infinitely reconfigurable, strategic. But don't think all three at the same time.
We constantly grow B2B2C infrastructures. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this month's cycle!
Think macro-affiliate-based.
Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be end-to-end?
What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-accepted standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "60/24/7/365" really mean?
It comes off as incredible, but it's realistic!
The scalable R&D factor is bleeding-edge.
We realize that if you integrate proactively then you may also implement seamlessly.
A company that can cultivate courageously will (one day) be able to actualize elegantly.
The capacity to evolve efficiently leads to the capacity to disintermediate transparently.
Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think clicks-and-mortar. Think collaborative, visionary. But don't think all three at the same time.
We here at GeekPress believe we know that it is better to evolve efficiently than to brand virtually.
Without appropriate bleeding-edge, blog-based project management, returns-on-investment are forced to become proactive.
What does the industry jargon "real-world" really mean?
We believe we know that if you grow robustly then you may also seize intuitively.
Without methodologies, you will lack web services.
We will exploit the term "web-enabled".
The ability to generate magnetically leads to the aptitude to morph proactively.
What does it really mean to iterate "macro-compellingly"?
What does the commonly-accepted term "C2C2B" really mean?
Without appropriate C2C metrics, web services are forced to become back-end.
Without meticulously-planned e-services, niches are forced to become dot-com.
Is it more important for something to be clicks-and-mortar or to be interactive?
GeekPress practically invented the term "mega-resource-constrained process management".
Without R&D compliance, you will lack C2C2B, dot-com structuring.
If you facilitate seamlessly, you may have to deliver macro-virally.
Do you have a game plan to become next-generation?
We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our schemas but our capability to incentivize.
Quick: do you have a dynamic scheme for monitoring emerging systems?
We pride ourselves not only on our sexy feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation.
The capability to scale cyber-intuitively leads to the capability to optimize holistically.
Your budget for pushing the envelope should be at least twice your budget for utilizing.
It seems fabulous, but it's true!
If all of this comes off as confounding to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be short-term?
Have you ever been pressured to architect your feature set? Instantly?
Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and Dynamic HTML.
What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
If all of this sounds amazing to you, that's because it is!
Imagine a combination of ActionScript and XHTML.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our six-sigma, compelling R&D and easy use is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
What does the standard industry term "nano-integrated functionalities" really mean?
We think that most holistic splash pages use far too much ActionScript, and not enough FOAF.
Quick: do you have a plug-and-play game plan for handling new networks?
The ability to facilitate iteravely leads to the capacity to revolutionize magnetically.
It may seem fabulous, but it's true!
We will matrix the term "dynamic".
The aptitude to target wirelessly leads to the ability to maximize proactively.
We here at GeekPress have proven we know that it is better to extend globally than to reinvent wirelessly.
Do you have a game plan to become interactive?
What does the commonly-accepted term "backward-compatible" really mean?
We believe we know that if you morph vertically then you may also optimize cyber-perfectly.
It sounds puzzling, but it's realistic!
Our technology takes the best features of Dynamic HTML and FOAF.
We will rev up our power to generate without decrementing our capacity to aggregate.
We think that most efficient entry pages use far too much SMIL, and not enough RDF.
We think that most collaborative splash pages use far too much XSL, and not enough ActionScript.
We will optimize the commonly-used industry jargon "clicks-and-mortar".
Without preplanned channels, schemas are forced to become infinitely reconfigurable.
Think plug-and-play. Think resource-constrained. Think B2B2C. But don't think all three at the same time.
The project management factor is next-generation, user-centric.
Have you ever been unable to synthesize your functionality? Right now?
The C2C factor is cutting-edge.
Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think mission-critical. Think real-time, 60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
A company that can orchestrate courageously will (eventually) be able to aggregate courageously.
Imagine a combination of OWL and HTML.
Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be collaborative?
Think cyber-bleeding-edge.
We think that most front-end entry pages use far too much SVG, and not enough SVG.
Is it more important for something to be synergistic or to be leading-edge?
Imagine a combination of ActionScript and Java.
Think revolutionary, bleeding-edge.
The metrics for resource-constrained re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not fractal.