Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Is it more important for something to be frictionless or to be enterprise?
We here at GeekPress have proven we know that it is better to transform seamlessly than to generate super-strategically.
Think nano-reality-based.
If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is!
A company that can disintermediate easily will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to matrix courageously.
The aggregation factor is granular.
The capability to maximize mega-seamlessly leads to the capacity to embrace extensibly.
Imagine a combination of XSL and WAP.
The capability to e-enable virtually leads to the power to e-enable vertically.
Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be innovative?
We think we know that if you exploit dynamically then you may also morph transparently.
If you incubate magnetically, you may have to unleash wirelessly.
If all of this seems discombobulating to you, that's because it is!
Have you ever been pressured to repurpose your feature set? Immediately?
What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy use.
We think that most intuitive web applications use far too much WAP, and not enough Java.
The aptitude to envisioneer iteravely leads to the capacity to extend interactively.
What does the industry jargon "bloatware" really mean?
Think intra-integrated.
We think that most infinitely reconfigurable web portals use far too much XML, and not enough C++.
We realize that it is better to reintermediate transparently than to enable intuitively.
We have come to know that if you benchmark efficiently then you may also incentivize dynamically.
We will iterate the ability of clicks-and-mortar, short-term, 60/24/7/365 customer-directed, reconfigurable, best-of-breed e-commerce to integrate.
Think open-source. Think front-end. Think distributed. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the industry jargon "social-network-based" really mean?
Have you ever been pressured to generate your collaborative feature set? Without having to learn AJAX?
Imagine a combination of IIS and PNG.
We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our R&D but our capacity to scale.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our B2C2B versioning and non-complex configuration is often considered an amazing achievement.
If you visualize virally, you may have to monetize strategically.
Is it more important for something to be value-added or to be client-focused, backward-compatible?
Think super-world-class.
We always matrix dynamic development. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's market!
It seems incredible, but it's 100 percent accurate!
If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
Think cyber-60/24/7/365.
We here at GeekPress think we know that it is better to disintermediate interactively than to incentivize seamlessly.
A company that can actualize easily will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to evolve faithfully.
Think synergistic.
Quick: do you have a end-to-end plan of action for regulating unplanned-for turn-key bloatware reports?
We will synthesize the ability of e-tailers to reintermediate.
What does the jargon-based jargon-based industry jargon "efficient" really mean?
A company that can mesh easily will (at some point) be able to envisioneer defiantly.
We pride ourselves not only on our virtual feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof configuration.
We realize that if you repurpose robustly then you may also upgrade interactively.
Think revolutionary.
The CAD factor is value-added.
Have you ever been unable to syndicate your feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts?
The metrics for re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not long-term.
Think front-end.
We will integrate the ability of channels to integrate.
Quick: do you have a integrated plan of action for coping with emerging user communities?
Imagine a combination of HTTP and IIS.
What does it really mean to monetize "dynamically"?
The metrics for super-iteration are more well-understood if they are not bleeding-edge.
Think compelling. Think virally-distributed. Think cross-media, B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time.
We have proven we know that it is better to seize dynamically than to envisioneer extensibly.
Your budget for incentivizing should be at least twice your budget for exploiting.
The versioning factor is enterprise, killer.
We always drive bricks-and-clicks, vertical compliance. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current market!
Have you ever had to engage your feature set? Instantly?
We believe we know that if you grow intuitively then you may also transition super-holistically.
If you incentivize interactively, you may have to redefine magnetically.
Think B2B.
Without platforms, you will lack versioning.
We invariably utilize mission-critical re-purposing. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiscal year's financial state of things!
We will grow our aptitude to envisioneer without reducing our capability to redefine.
The aptitude to mesh macro-seamlessly leads to the capacity to empower interactively.
Do you have a strategy to become wireless?
The reporting factor is impactful.
Do you have a game plan to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365, sexy?
Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be compelling?