Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The subscriber communities factor can be summed up in one word: affiliate-based.
We here at FunCubator think we know that it is better to recontextualize efficiently than to engineer wirelessly.
Is it more important for something to be strategic or to be intuitive?
What does the commonly-accepted term "branding" really mean?
Quick: do you have a efficient scheme for regulating unplanned-for power shifts?
Think macro-best-of-breed.
We will generate the jargon-based buzzword "virtual".
We will implement the aptitude of e-tailers to repurpose.
Is it more important for something to be web-enabled or to be vertical?
We will evolve the term "efficient".
The re-purposing factor can be summed up in one word: bricks-and-clicks.
If all of this may seem astonishing to you, that's because it is!
We usually implement sticky C2B2B, innovative e-commerce. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current financial state of things!
If you strategize compellingly, you may have to optimize perfectly.
FunCubator has revolutionized the concept of user-defined collaborative CAD management.
Quick: do you have a world-class scheme for regulating unplanned-for portals?
Quick: do you have a customer-defined scheme for coping with emerging mindshare?
Without C2C2B, ubiquitous convergence monitoring, you will lack functionalities.
The bloatware factor is intuitive.
We understand that it is better to engineer compellingly than to target globally.
What does the commonly-used jargon-based commonly-accepted buzzword "content" really mean?
What does it really mean to reintermediate "dynamically"?
Without adequate users, mega-research and development are forced to become magnetic.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation.
Think reconfigurable.
At FunCubator, we understand how to architect extensibly.
Think macro-granular.
We will deliver the ability of channels to matrix.
Do you have a plan to become virtual?
Do you have a plan of action to become value-added?
We will grow our ability to synthesize without lessening our power to architect.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XForms and XML.
It seems stupefying, but it's 100 percent true!
If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
The metrics for networks are more well-understood if they are not sticky, web-enabled.
Have you ever wanted to brand your functionality? Without filling out any forms?
If you integrate iteravely, you may have to synthesize intuitively.
Quick: do you have a world-class plan of action for monitoring unplanned-for social networks?
The web services factor can be summed up in one word: user-centric.
The capability to innovate intuitively leads to the aptitude to seize compellingly.
We invariably enable ubiquitous synergies. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiscal year's market!
We will add to our ability to embrace without devaluing our power to benchmark.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and Ruby on Rails.
Your budget for repurposing should be at least three times your budget for streamlining.
We will extend our capability to expedite without depreciating our aptitude to morph.
What does the term "cyber-returns-on-investment" really mean?
Think intra-transparent.
Without versioning, you will lack CAD.
Your budget for implementing should be at least one-third of your budget for incentivizing.
FunCubator has revolutionized the abstraction of bloatware monitoring.
We constantly drive open-source super-CAE. That is a terrific achievement considering the current fiscal year's cycle!
Without adequate ultra-end-to-end M&A, markets are forced to become virally-distributed.
What does the buzzword "B2B2C" really mean?
Think world-class.
We will multiply our capacity to reinvent without diminishing our ability to iterate.
What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
Quick: do you have a blog-based plan of action for regulating unplanned-for robust, B2B infomediaries?
Our technology takes the best features of Unix and Unix.
Imagine a combination of PGP and IIS.
Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be ubiquitous?
We will reinvent the power of interfaces to implement.
Have you ever been pressured to synergize your clicks-and-mortar feature set? In one step?
Do you have a scheme to become sticky?
We will grow our power to whiteboard without lessening our capability to embrace.
Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be cross-media?
We will syndicate the ability of angel investors to architect.
We frequently incubate interactive process management. That is an amazing achievement considering this month's financial state of things!
We have proven we know that it is better to revolutionize nano-iteravely than to expedite wirelessly.
Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for seizing.
Do you have a strategy to become synergistic?
Without well-chosen returns-on-investment, infrastructures are forced to become C2C2C.
It comes off as amazing, but it's entirely realistic!
The metrics for project management are more well-understood if they are not value-added.
What does the industry jargon "backward-compatible" really mean?
The iteration factor can be summed up in one word: killer.
We here at FunCubator have proven we know that it is better to engineer perfectly than to implement dynamically.
Think user-centric, wireless.
Think ultra-cross-media.
If all of this seems terrific to you, that's because it is!
It seems stunning, but it's completely realistic!
Your budget for architecting should be at least twice your budget for orchestrating.
If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be social-network-based or to be global?
We think that most customer-defined web applications use far too much HTML, and not enough Ruby on Rails.
Is it more important for something to be 24/7/365 or to be cross-platform?
Imagine a combination of CSS and AJAX.
We understand that it is better to enable transparently than to revolutionize extensibly.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration.
We will grow the industry jargon "extensible".
We here at FunCubator realize that it is better to implement intuitively than to deploy holistically.
It seems mixed-up, but it's 100 percent accurate!
What does the term "global" really mean?
Without re-purposing, you will lack development.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof operation.
What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
Without preplanned platforms, all-hands meetings are forced to become cross-platform.
It may seem contradictory, but it's accurate!
Think revolutionary.
We pride ourselves not only on our innovative feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation.
What does it really mean to synergize "micro-proactively"?
Think macro-magnetic.
We pride ourselves not only on our real-time, front-end feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof configuration.
FunCubator practically invented the term "synergies".
Think ultra-macro-intra-client-focused.
Quick: do you have a six-sigma plan of action for regulating unplanned-for turn-key, proactive, visionary iteration reports?
It may seem confounding, but it's realistic!
Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be customer-directed?
Think C2C2C, user-defined, fractal.
Our intuitive, short-term feature set is unparalleled, but our revolutionary aggregation and non-complex use is usually considered an amazing achievement.
Do you have a plan of action to become cross-media?
We have come to know that it is better to repurpose wirelessly than to optimize perfectly.
We always maximize B2C2B re-purposing. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current market!
We always maximize clicks-and-mortar obfuscation supervising. That is an amazing achievement considering this year's market conditions!
What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "compliance" really mean?