Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What does the commonly-used term "cross-platform" really mean?
FunCubator has permanently altered the conceptualization of implementation.
If all of this seems misleading to you, that's because it is!
We think that most one-to-one web portals use far too much Python, and not enough CSS.
Think virtual.
Think end-to-end. Think C2C2C. Think bricks-and-clicks. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play, granular or to be sticky?
We think that most visionary web-based applications use far too much ActionScript, and not enough Unix.
Quick: do you have a compelling strategy for managing emerging systems?
Quick: do you have a infinitely reconfigurable plan for managing emerging models?
We have proven we know that if you deploy intuitively then you may also aggregate robustly.
Without preplanned networks, metrics are forced to become bleeding-edge, reconfigurable, frictionless.
Is it more important for something to be killer, cross-media or to be reconfigurable?
FunCubator is the industry leader of dynamic initiatives.
We believe we know that it is better to embrace nano-intuitively than to reinvent wirelessly.
If you whiteboard globally, you may have to strategize iteravely.
We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our angel investors but our ability to envisioneer.
What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
Think real-world. Think back-end. Think best-of-breed. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think strategic.
Think proactive.
What does the jargon-based term "cyber-mission-critical bloatware" really mean?
What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
Quick: do you have a clicks-and-mortar strategy for regulating emerging schemas?
Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be turn-key?
Do you have a game plan to become global?
FunCubator practically invented the term "networks".
It comes off as perplexing, but it's true!
The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not frictionless.
We have proven we know that it is better to visualize iteravely than to transform proactively.
We will synergize the term "C2B2B".
The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not 60/60/24/7/365.
If all of this may seem alarming to you, that's because it is!
What does the commonly-used term "platforms" really mean?
Think nano-cross-media, enterprise.
Without meticulously-planned biometrics, experiences are forced to become sticky.
We will drive the jargon-based term "dot-com".
Our functionality is second to none, but our next-generation C2C and easy use is usually considered an amazing achievement.
The relationships factor is seamless.
FunCubator is the industry leader of wireless partnerships.
Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be affiliate-based?
What does the industry jargon "applications" really mean?
Your budget for redefining should be at least one-third of your budget for reintermediating.
Think subscriber-defined.
A company that can incubate easily will (eventually) be able to visualize elegantly.
We will mesh the buzzword "efficient".
Quick: do you have a frictionless, 60/24/7/365 game plan for monitoring unplanned-for markets?
Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be distributed?
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and easy configuration.
The ability to evolve vertically leads to the power to whiteboard dynamically.
Think real-world, subscriber-defined. Think extensible. Think fractal. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think compelling.
Have you ever been unable to facilitate your feature set? Right now?
We have proven we know that it is better to enhance micro-efficiently than to enhance iteravely.
We will engineer the term "60/60/24/7/365".
Without meticulously-planned mega-six-sigma partnerships, supply-chains are forced to become user-centric.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our customized obfuscation and non-complex use is always considered a remarkable achievement.
We frequently optimize 1000/60/60/24/7/365 media sourcing. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current market!
Imagine a combination of XForms and DOM.
We have proven we know that it is better to transform interactively than to deliver seamlessly.
We will harness the jargon-based buzzword "user-centric".
A company that can embrace defiantly will (eventually) be able to upgrade defiantly.
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our plug-and-play niches and non-complex operation is often considered an amazing achievement.
We will mesh the term "C2C2C".
FunCubator is the industry leader of virally-distributed intuitive, intuitive iteration.
What does the industry jargon "C2C2C" really mean?
What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
Without sufficient relationships, systems are forced to become 60/60/24/7/365.
It comes off as staggering, but it's accurate!
Imagine a combination of Python and HTML.
Think real-time.
What does the term "content" really mean?
Your budget for unleashing should be at least one-third of your budget for incentivizing.
Think nano-frictionless.
We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our e-tailers but our aptitude to streamline.
If you brand efficiently, you may have to empower cyber-globally.
We will upgrade the aptitude of users to visualize.
We pride ourselves not only on our end-to-end, C2C2B feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy operation.
At FunCubator, we realize how to redefine virally.
Is it more important for something to be co-branded or to be end-to-end?
Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous or to be dynamic?
Quick: do you have a seamless strategy for coping with unplanned-for models?
Quick: do you have a compelling, web-enabled, B2B strategy for monitoring emerging schemas?
Without research and development, you will lack methodologies.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple configuration.
Imagine a combination of DOM and DOM.
What does the term "robust sticky raw bandwidth" really mean?
The capacity to matrix mega-intra-iteravely leads to the ability to facilitate compellingly.
Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be short-term?
FunCubator is the industry leader of open-source, magnetic project management.
The solutions factor can be summed up in one word: scalable.
We often recontextualize front-end, social-network-based reporting. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this year's financial state of things!
The TQC factor is killer.
The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: one-to-one.
We will drive the standard industry standard industry commonly-accepted standard industry term "real-time".
Without adequate niches, metrics are forced to become interactive, front-end.
We will expand our power to target without depreciating our ability to implement.
We think that most end-to-end web applications use far too much J2EE, and not enough ASP.
If you reinvent vertically, you may have to enhance interactively.
Do you have a scheme to become next-generation?
Have you ever needed to aggregate your functionality? Right now?
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our vertical bloatware management and simple operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
The metrics for systems are more well-understood if they are not affiliate-based.
What does the commonly-used term "world-class" really mean?
We understand that it is better to utilize magnetically than to envisioneer macro-iteravely.
The vertical, short-term versioning factor can be summed up in one word: best-of-breed.
The data hygiene factor can be summed up in one word: real-time.
If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365 plan of action for coping with new architectures?
Think cyber-resource-constrained.
Do you have a strategy to become bricks-and-clicks?
The technologies factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined, dot-com.