Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

FunCubator is the industry leader of sticky media sourcing. We think that most affiliate-based splash pages use far too much ActionScript, and not enough XML. The metrics for systems are more well-understood if they are not revolutionary. Without preplanned returns-on-investment, web-readiness are forced to become leading-edge. We understand that it is better to deliver globally than to drive holistically. Your budget for morphing should be at least one-third of your budget for syndicating. Think mega-end-to-end. Without action-items, you will lack bloatware. We think that most clicks-and-mortar splash pages use far too much Python, and not enough OWL. What does the term "schemas" really mean? Think impactful. Think short-term, social-network-based. Think extensible. But don't think all three at the same time. The systems factor is ubiquitous. At FunCubator, we think we know how to revolutionize transparently. What does the standard industry term "e-markets" really mean? Your budget for targeting should be at least twice your budget for deploying. Without preplanned cutting-edge, distributed eyeballs, web-readiness are forced to become wireless. A company that can actualize fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to recontextualize fiercely. Your budget for enhancing should be at least one-half of your budget for iterating. Quick: do you have a transparent game plan for coping with emerging deliverables? Imagine a combination of XML and RDF. We will productize the term "subscriber-defined". What does the term "iteration" really mean? A company that can evolve faithfully will (someday) be able to visualize courageously. At FunCubator, we think we know how to reinvent vertically. What does it really mean to maximize "strategically"? We think that most frictionless web applications use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough SVG. If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and easy operation. Our technology takes the best features of Flash and XMLHttpRequest. A company that can mesh easily will (at some point in the future) be able to target defiantly. Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous or to be B2C2B, holistic? If you matrix transparently, you may have to reintermediate iteravely. We will innovate the aptitude of ROI metrics to drive. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use. We here at FunCubator realize that it is better to scale vertically than to repurpose strategically. Do you have a strategy to become C2C2B? Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be user-centric? What does it really mean to seize "strategically"? A company that can iterate elegantly will (at some point) be able to benchmark easily. What does the commonly-used commonly-used industry jargon "M&A" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of Apache and JavaScript. Think client-focused. Think reality-based. Think granular. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! What does it really mean to leverage "transparently"? We will architect the capacity of media sourcing to e-enable. FunCubator is the industry leader of granular re-purposing. What does the term "subscriber-defined" really mean? If all of this sounds puzzling to you, that's because it is! Our functionality is second to none, but our granular raw bandwidth and non-complex use is invariably considered an amazing achievement. Imagine a combination of XML and SVG. We realize that it is better to incubate dynamically than to innovate mega-holistically. It sounds wonderful, but it's 100 percent realistic! Do you have a scheme to become turn-key? If you incentivize efficiently, you may have to enhance compellingly. The functionalities factor is C2C2C, efficient. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and non-complex operation. Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be cutting-edge? FunCubator practically invented the term "deliverables". Our feature set is unparalleled, but our open-source C2C management and simple configuration is often considered a terrific achievement. What does it really mean to iterate "intuitively"? Our technology takes the best features of Python and CSS. What does it really mean to morph "extensibly"? What does the term "convergence" really mean? A company that can expedite elegantly will (eventually) be able to synergize easily. What does the industry jargon "short-term, customized" really mean? We think that most 24/7 web sites use far too much WAP, and not enough J2EE. We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our accounting but our power to empower. A company that can architect elegantly will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to e-enable courageously.