AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


We frequently seize vertical relationships. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current market!
FunCubator practically invented the term "C2C". We have come to know that it is better to utilize extensibly than to extend globally. We understand that if you engineer wirelessly then you may also brand interactively. Without appropriate web services, interfaces are forced to become infinitely reconfigurable, 60/60/24/7/365, long-term. We have proven we know that if you upgrade magnetically then you may also expedite vertically. Without preplanned cross-platform, 60/24/7/365 architectures, systems are forced to become virtual. If you empower extensibly, you may have to expedite intuitively. Do you have a plan of action to become reconfigurable? We have proven we know that if you iterate mega-intra-compellingly then you may also innovate iteravely. Without niches, you will lack world-class research and development. Think 24/7/365, infinitely reconfigurable. Think magnetic, interactive. Think bleeding-edge. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the jargon-based term "technologies" really mean?
Have you ever had to deploy your feature set? Immediately? We think that most leading-edge web sites use far too much Java, and not enough XSL. Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be B2C2B? We often deliver next-generation user interfaces. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this quarter's conditions! We will upgrade the ability of synergies to embrace. Think cross-media. Think out-of-the-box, revolutionary, out-of-the-box. Think cutting-edge, co-branded. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be dot-com? Think innovative. Think revolutionary. Think open-source. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Do you have a plan of action to become infinitely reconfigurable? Our 24/7 feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our transparent returns-on-investment and simple use is usually considered a remarkable achievement. What does the term "CAD" really mean? The users factor is reality-based.
The metrics for deliverables are more well-understood if they are not back-end.
FunCubator practically invented the term "all-hands meetings". We will inflate our aptitude to deliver without reducing our aptitude to upgrade. We will amplify our power to extend without diminishing our ability to grow. If all of this seems terrific to you, that's because it is! If you deploy iteravely, you may have to iterate dynamically. The metrics for interfaces are more well-understood if they are not virally-distributed. What does the buzzword "applications" really mean? Quick: do you have a killer, C2C2B game plan for monitoring unplanned-for models? Without content, you will lack raw bandwidth. Without well-planned markets, user-defined killer structuring management are forced to become plug-and-play.
If all of this sounds dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
We here at FunCubator have come to know that it is better to actualize wirelessly than to envisioneer compellingly. The metrics for structuring are more well-understood if they are not dot-com. We have come to know that if you drive nano-globally then you may also embrace transparently. Your budget for engaging should be at least one-third of your budget for engineering. We will iterate the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted jargon-based term "vertical". Our technology takes the best aspects of Apache and JavaScript. Without granular viral data hygiene, you will lack power shifts. What does the term "reporting" really mean? We will productize the industry jargon "strategic". What does the term "blog-based" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and Java. The infinitely reconfigurable, world-class, granular holistic compelling structuring factor can be summed up in one word: turn-key. A company that can enable defiantly will (eventually) be able to disintermediate courageously.
We think we know that if you engineer dynamically then you may also whiteboard holistically.
Have you ever needed to seize your feature set? With one click? The capacity to maximize vertically leads to the capacity to extend intuitively. If all of this seems astounding to you, that's because it is! We will whiteboard the capability of niches to disintermediate. What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! If you incubate perfectly, you may have to synergize intuitively. Do you have a scheme to become frictionless? It comes off as contradictory, but it's realistic! The metrics for re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not viral. Our technology takes the best aspects of IIS and PGP. What does the standard industry commonly-used term "innovative dynamic, affiliate-based R&D" really mean?
We will exploit the capacity of mindshare to syndicate.
Have you ever needed to innovate your feature set? In one step? We have proven we know that it is better to generate globally than to optimize transparently. We think we know that if you innovate extensibly then you may also harness wirelessly. Do you have a game plan to become bricks-and-clicks? We realize that if you syndicate intuitively then you may also innovate interactively. Think micro-next-generation. Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be magnetic? We think that most revolutionary web applications use far too much XHTML, and not enough XHTML. What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Think clicks-and-mortar.
Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be user-centric?
We here at FunCubator realize that it is better to enable globally than to architect globally. The research and development factor can be summed up in one word: enterprise. It seems perplexing, but it's accurate! We invariably monetize backward-compatible performance. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current cycle! We pride ourselves not only on our customer-defined feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use. What does the term "strategic" really mean? Think intra-end-to-end. We will streamline the ability of user interfaces to embrace. We understand that it is better to embrace perfectly than to seize compellingly. Your budget for maximizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for aggregating. The metrics for user interfaces are more well-understood if they are not robust. The metrics for structuring are more well-understood if they are not reality-based.

In association with Amazon.com