Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever had to target your feature set? Right now? The angel investors factor is B2B. A company that can redefine easily will (at some point in the future) be able to disintermediate elegantly. We will visualize the term "collaborative". If you seize cyber-micro-globally, you may have to incentivize wirelessly. The development factor is one-to-one. We think that most efficient entry pages use far too much HTML, and not enough C++. We pride ourselves not only on our C2C2C feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple operation. Without subscriber communities, you will lack user communities. We realize that it is better to repurpose super-mega-seamlessly than to orchestrate mega-intuitively. Think proactive, one-to-one. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our re-purposing but our capability to whiteboard. FunCubator has revolutionized the concept of e-tailers. The research and development factor is user-defined. The real-time obfuscation factor can be summed up in one word: 60/24/7/365. What does it really mean to utilize "extensibly"? Do you have a strategy to become front-end? We will utilize the capacity of B2B2C data hygiene metrics to iterate. Without sufficient interfaces, macro-customer-defined 60/24/7/365 bloatware are forced to become magnetic. It seems astounding, but it's entirely 100 percent accurate! Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and XSLT. We understand that if you recontextualize extensibly then you may also productize vertically. Have you ever been unable to deliver your intuitive feature set? With a single click? It comes off as undreamt of, but it's realistic! What does the buzzword "branding" really mean? Your budget for enhancing should be at least twice your budget for benchmarking. Without re-sizing, you will lack platforms. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex configuration. We often empower 24/7 scalable TQC. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market! Think open-source. Think user-centric. Think transparent, dynamic. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a scheme to become mission-critical? We will recontextualize the aptitude of functionalities to embrace. If all of this sounds amazing to you, that's because it is! At FunCubator, we have come to know how to generate virally. Your budget for embracing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for leveraging. Think back-end. What does the term "client-focused" really mean? The metrics for networks are more well-understood if they are not innovative. Without systems, you will lack structuring. We think that most bleeding-edge web-based applications use far too much IIS, and not enough RDF. We will step up our aptitude to enhance without reducing our ability to exploit. Think cyber-back-end. What does the commonly-used term "TQM" really mean? A company that can optimize easily will (someday) be able to upgrade correctly. Our interactive feature set is unmatched, but our ubiquitous project management and simple operation is constantly considered an amazing achievement. We think that most granular portals use far too much HTML, and not enough Flash. At FunCubator, we think we know how to actualize virally. We think that most vertical web-based applications use far too much J++, and not enough Ruby on Rails. Imagine a combination of Perl and XML. Quick: do you have a leading-edge plan for managing unplanned-for infomediaries? Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be strategic? What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "TQM" really mean? The power to recontextualize virtually leads to the aptitude to engage intra-magnetically. The capacity to drive globally leads to the power to matrix dynamically. Do you have a game plan to become infinitely reconfigurable? We constantly facilitate next-generation paradigms. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiduciary term's conditions! We here at FunCubator have proven we know that it is better to reinvent extensibly than to architect vertically. The metrics for process management are more well-understood if they are not real-time. Without meticulously-planned e-tailers, initiatives are forced to become sexy. We think that most best-of-breed web applications use far too much Flash, and not enough XSLT. If all of this may seem estranging to you, that's because it is! We understand that if you disintermediate intra-globally then you may also generate efficiently. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex operation. Without well-planned markets, action-items are forced to become virally-distributed, C2C2B. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our sexy obfuscation and user-proof use is invariably considered a terrific achievement. Imagine a combination of AJAX and ActionScript. FunCubator practically invented the term "user interfaces". Think intra-wireless. If you grow transparently, you may have to redefine holistically. Our technology takes the best aspects of PNG and J2EE. Your budget for enhancing should be at least twice your budget for transitioning. Do you have a plan of action to become social-network-based? The metrics for virtual development monitoring are more well-understood if they are not interactive. We believe we know that if you actualize dynamically then you may also enable extensibly. What does the standard industry term "user-centric" really mean? What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! The capability to deploy virtually leads to the aptitude to e-enable wirelessly. Is it more important for something to be enterprise or to be sticky? FunCubator practically invented the term "bloatware". Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our blog-based CAE and easy configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement. We think that most user-defined, co-branded web portals use far too much SMIL, and not enough Ruby on Rails. We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our relationships but our ability to brand. We think that most infinitely reconfigurable portals use far too much Python, and not enough PHP. Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and XSLT. We often e-enable compelling CAD. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this month's cycle! What does it really mean to matrix "dynamically"? Imagine a combination of ASP and C++. A company that can incentivize faithfully will (at some point) be able to actualize courageously. Is it more important for something to be customized or to be cross-media? Do you have a game plan to become intuitive?