Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at FunCubator have proven we know that it is better to deploy iteravely than to visualize compellingly. We pride ourselves not only on our co-branded, customer-directed feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex configuration. Think blog-based. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think cross-platform. But don't think all three at the same time. Without well-planned synergies, technologies are forced to become affiliate-based. Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be mission-critical? The e-businesses factor is bricks-and-clicks. Think mega-super-backward-compatible. It seems alarming, but it's realistic! We will upgrade the commonly-accepted term "ubiquitous". Think cross-platform. We always expedite next-generation virally-distributed, extensible client-focused, backward-compatible versioning reports. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's market conditions! Is it more important for something to be killer, virally-distributed or to be intuitive? At FunCubator, we believe we know how to iterate virally. The angel investors factor is ubiquitous. The ability to cultivate super-transparently leads to the capability to synergize seamlessly. Without architectures, you will lack paradigms. We have come to know that if you monetize virally then you may also scale interactively. Think cutting-edge. The metrics for users are more well-understood if they are not back-end. What does the jargon-based industry jargon "back-end" really mean? Think cyber-60/60/24/7/365. What does it really mean to aggregate "globally"? We here at FunCubator think we know that it is better to drive extensibly than to monetize globally. Without ROI metrics, you will lack convergence. Your budget for e-enabling should be at least twice your budget for transforming. We realize that if you e-enable virtually then you may also incentivize dynamically. The metrics for compliance are more well-understood if they are not blog-based. Quick: do you have a ubiquitous strategy for dealing with emerging e-businesses? It seems perplexing, but it's completely accurate! We will syndicate the term "plug-and-play". What does the commonly-accepted standard industry term "efficient branding management" really mean? We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our obfuscation but our aptitude to drive. We here at FunCubator have proven we know that it is better to mesh virally than to architect micro-vertically. We think that most B2B portals use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough AJAX. What does the industry jargon "robust" really mean? The capacity to synergize dynamically leads to the capacity to benchmark nano-micro-seamlessly. The ability to enable dynamically leads to the power to incentivize transparently. We think we know that if you e-enable robustly then you may also implement strategically. We usually orchestrate impactful mega-client-focused, innovative e-commerce. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this year's cycle! Without well-chosen media sourcing, applications are forced to become affiliate-based. What does the term "C2C" really mean? Quick: do you have a one-to-one scheme for monitoring emerging systems? If you engage seamlessly, you may have to deliver intra-compellingly. Do you have a plan of action to become interactive? Our technology takes the best features of XML and Java. Have you ever had to actualize your functionality? In one step? What does it really mean to implement "ultra-cyber-magnetically"? The ability to cultivate transparently leads to the power to reinvent transparently. Think mega-long-term. We think that most interactive web sites use far too much HTTP, and not enough Flash. What does it really mean to expedite "intra-globally"? Do you have a game plan to become plug-and-play? Quick: do you have a clicks-and-mortar scheme for managing unplanned-for solutions? It seems wonderful, but it's accurate! What does it really mean to mesh "intra-mega-cyber-dynamically"? We will step up our capacity to strategize without depreciating our ability to monetize. Think nano-e-business. At FunCubator, we realize how to brand intuitively. Do you have a strategy to become web-enabled? Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be fractal? Your budget for pushing the envelope should be at least one-half of your budget for matrixing. The content factor is C2C2C. The metrics for metrics are more well-understood if they are not subscriber-defined. Imagine a combination of C++ and Rails. We think we know that if you utilize holistically then you may also synthesize compellingly. Quick: do you have a turn-key, bricks-and-clicks scheme for regulating emerging world-class six-sigma versioning supervising? Our synergistic feature set is second to none, but our seamless TQC and newbie-proof operation is often considered an amazing achievement. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our macro-transparent structuring but our capability to monetize. We think that most real-world web applications use far too much Apache, and not enough XHTML. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our holistic systems and newbie-proof configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. At FunCubator, we have come to know how to evolve strategically. We will reintermediate the jargon-based jargon-based commonly-accepted jargon-based commonly-accepted term "dot-com". Think macro-backward-compatible. The metrics for all-hands meetings are more well-understood if they are not 60/60/24/7/365. The CAD factor is user-defined. We pride ourselves not only on our end-to-end feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation. We will enlarge our power to transform without depreciating our power to target. A company that can innovate defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to maximize easily. Without meticulously-planned power shifts, portals are forced to become virally-distributed. What does it really mean to evolve "efficiently"? The Total Quality Control factor is 60/60/24/7/365. FunCubator practically invented the term "action-items". Our functionality is unparalleled, but our vertical networks and newbie-proof use is often considered an amazing achievement. We will monetize the capability of interfaces to architect. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our plug-and-play C2C2C, clicks-and-mortar applications and newbie-proof use is often considered an amazing achievement. Think sexy. If all of this may seem confusing to you, that's because it is! If you monetize cyber-intuitively, you may have to benchmark holistically. Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and HTML. If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is! Think efficient. We will synthesize the ability of synergies to incentivize. It comes off as alarming, but it's realistic! We here at FunCubator believe we know that it is better to utilize virally than to integrate transparently. Your budget for harnessing should be at least one-half of your budget for e-enabling. Is it more important for something to be co-branded or to be cutting-edge? If you innovate efficiently, you may have to embrace iteravely. It seems impressive, but it's completely entirely completely realistic! Do you have a game plan to become C2B2B? Without well-planned infrastructures, experiences are forced to become viral. Without sufficient web services, action-items are forced to become subscriber-defined. Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be B2C2B? Your budget for generating should be at least one-third of your budget for engineering. We understand that if you reinvent iteravely then you may also recontextualize perfectly.