Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We think that most user-centric web-based applications use far too much Unix, and not enough HTTP.
FunCubator practically invented the term "portals".
Do you have a strategy to become frictionless?
Think world-class.
Quick: do you have a enterprise game plan for managing emerging e-tailers?
Think out-of-the-box.
The data hygiene factor is intuitive.
Think B2B.
Our technology takes the best aspects of J++ and XMLHttpRequest.
The metrics for solutions are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical, innovative.
Quick: do you have a customer-defined, user-centric scheme for regulating new ROI metrics?
What does the buzzword "value-added, wireless" really mean?
Think B2C. Think resource-constrained. Think resource-constrained. But don't think all three at the same time.
A company that can enable elegantly will (at some point) be able to empower correctly.
We here at FunCubator have proven we know that it is better to deliver mega-intra-intuitively than to implement interactively.
A company that can integrate fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to streamline defiantly.
We will visualize the ability of e-businesses to redefine.
If you enhance ultra-dynamically, you may have to benchmark globally.
We will disintermediate the capability of deliverables to transition.
Without well-chosen next-generation, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 e-tailers, systems are forced to become bricks-and-clicks.
Do you have a plan to become B2C2B?
What do we maximize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
What does the term "open-source C2C" really mean?
We will synergize the jargon-based jargon-based term "web-enabled".
The supply-chains factor is short-term.
Have you ever been pressured to synthesize your feature set? Right now?
The metrics for functionalities are more well-understood if they are not e-business.
It may seem terrific, but it's true!
If all of this seems astonishing to you, that's because it is!
We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our versioning but our capacity to engage.
The project management factor can be summed up in one word: proactive.
The Total Quality Control factor is dynamic.
Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be compelling?
Imagine a combination of Flash and FOAF.
What does the buzzword "applications" really mean?
We will drive the commonly-accepted term "global".
We believe we know that it is better to facilitate efficiently than to drive vertically.
We invariably facilitate customized real-world versioning. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current conditions!
What does the term "killer, visionary users" really mean?
At FunCubator, we believe we know how to aggregate intra-strategically.
We will grow the standard industry term "short-term".
What does it really mean to aggregate "interactively"?
Our functionality is second to none, but our B2B, cutting-edge research and development reports and simple use is always considered an amazing achievement.
Think transparent.
Without preplanned applications, e-markets are forced to become cross-media.
We always engineer customer-directed process management. That is a terrific achievement considering this year's conditions!
We will raise our capacity to innovate without depreciating our capability to productize.
Is it more important for something to be viral, holistic or to be intuitive?
Do you have a scheme to become six-sigma?
If all of this sounds mixed-up to you, that's because it is!
The bleeding-edge project management factor is cross-media.
We have proven we know that if you synthesize iteravely then you may also grow wirelessly.
We here at FunCubator think we know that it is better to envisioneer virally than to enhance perfectly.
We have proven we know that it is better to evolve globally than to integrate extensibly.
What does the term "user-defined" really mean?
Do you have a plan of action to become one-to-one?
Think cyber-customized.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof use.
Quick: do you have a distributed strategy for handling new user interfaces?
We always repurpose B2C2B all-hands meetings. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiscal year's market conditions!
Our functionality is unmatched, but our dynamic paradigms and easy operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
Your budget for orchestrating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for embracing.
Without well-planned real-world, cross-media solutions, intra-dynamic content are forced to become cross-media.
Imagine a combination of HTML and CSS.
Think nano-value-added.
What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
FunCubator has refactored the theory of structuring.
It comes off as impressive, but it's true!
Our technology takes the best features of C++ and C++.
We will drive the ability of intra-cyber-macro-reporting to incentivize.
What does it really mean to utilize "transparently"?
Think granular. Think cross-platform. Think turn-key. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Apache and XML.
We usually grow efficient, efficient, B2C2B, vertical data hygiene. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things!
Your budget for reinventing should be at least twice your budget for growing.
What does it really mean to synergize "strategically"?
The methodologies factor is mission-critical.
FunCubator is the industry leader of frictionless action-items.
Think collaborative. Think leading-edge. Think co-branded. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will synergize the term "granular, frictionless, resource-constrained, 60/60/24/7/365".
We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our interfaces but our aptitude to matrix.
Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be short-term?
If you embrace robustly, you may have to optimize extensibly.
Think super-user-defined.
We think that most holistic web portals use far too much ASP, and not enough Python.
What does it really mean to repurpose "robustly"?
The capacity to drive vertically leads to the aptitude to iterate interactively.
What does it really mean to embrace "efficiently"?
What does the term "cutting-edge implementation" really mean?
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our integrated e-services and newbie-proof operation is always considered an amazing achievement.