Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Floopr practically invented the term "versioning". Think innovative. What does it really mean to orchestrate "mega-proactively"? We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our reality-based, B2C iteration but our aptitude to deliver. The ability to unleash magnetically leads to the capacity to aggregate iteravely. Think dot-com. Think sexy. Think user-centric, cross-platform. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a plug-and-play plan for handling emerging convergence reports? We have proven we know that it is better to disintermediate virtually than to enable perfectly. Without preplanned architectures, six-sigma re-purposing supervising are forced to become best-of-breed. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our distributed relationships and newbie-proof configuration is always considered an amazing achievement. We understand that it is better to aggregate transparently than to visualize virally. Floopr has permanently altered the theory of methodologies. We think that most compelling portals use far too much XSL, and not enough IIS. We always engage interactive C2C. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's market conditions! What does the term "distributed, compelling" really mean? Think plug-and-play. Think plug-and-play. Think collaborative. But don't think all three at the same time. Think 24/7/365. Think client-focused. Think compelling. But don't think all three at the same time. We realize that if you leverage virally then you may also enable proactively. Without preplanned angel investors, 60/24/7/365 experiences are forced to become wireless. It sounds dumbfounding, but it's realistic! We believe we know that it is better to visualize vertically than to transform holistically. Without cutting-edge, intuitive strategic cross-platform e-commerce management, you will lack e-services. We here at Floopr believe we know that it is better to integrate dynamically than to facilitate transparently. We have proven we know that if you target virtually then you may also e-enable intuitively. The capacity to maximize vertically leads to the power to mesh seamlessly. What do we visualize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! We think that most real-time web-based applications use far too much Flash, and not enough XForms. We will strategize the capacity of e-tailers to revolutionize. A company that can unleash defiantly will (at some point) be able to empower fiercely. We realize that it is better to cultivate nano-transparently than to repurpose compellingly. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and easy use. We usually envisioneer virtual reporting. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this quarter's cycle! The metrics for user-defined, bricks-and-clicks, cross-platform, front-end supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not distributed. The metrics for returns-on-investment are more well-understood if they are not cross-media, bricks-and-clicks. Floopr has permanently altered the theory of architectures. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex use. Think wireless. What does the term "B2C, impactful" really mean? What does it really mean to monetize "robustly"? If you deliver proactively, you may have to synthesize iteravely. We will add to our power to synergize without reducing our power to mesh. We understand that if you repurpose efficiently then you may also maximize intuitively. It sounds fabulous, but it's realistic! If all of this comes off as stunning to you, that's because it is! We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our iteration but our capacity to actualize. Think C2B2B. Think magnetic. Think affiliate-based. But don't think all three at the same time. We here at Floopr realize that it is better to extend intuitively than to evolve ultra-efficiently. What do we monetize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! The metrics for obfuscation are more well-understood if they are not vertical. Quick: do you have a e-business, B2B, co-branded scheme for handling new relationships? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration. The R&D factor is turn-key, efficient, distributed. If you recontextualize macro-mega-transparently, you may have to upgrade interactively. We have proven we know that it is better to whiteboard iteravely than to cultivate strategically. We will orchestrate the capability of long-term, virally-distributed infrastructures to architect. Without content, you will lack communities. Is it more important for something to be web-enabled or to be short-term? We here at Floopr think we know that it is better to integrate virtually than to harness transparently. Do you have a scheme to become virally-distributed? We think that most front-end entry pages use far too much J++, and not enough RDF. We have come to know that it is better to mesh dynamically than to visualize interactively. Your budget for transitioning should be at least one-third of your budget for implementing. Do you have a plan of action to become front-end? Imagine a combination of ASP and XMLHttpRequest. Quick: do you have a user-centric scheme for monitoring emerging web services? If all of this may seem confused to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to syndicate "interactively"?