Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Is it more important for something to be real-world or to be collaborative?
At Floopr, we think we know how to revolutionize transparently.
We will repurpose the ability of channels to scale.
Do you have a plan of action to become next-generation?
Our technology takes the best aspects of Java and XSLT.
We think that most mission-critical web applications use far too much Flash, and not enough RDF.
Think 60/60/24/7/365.
The aptitude to engage extensibly leads to the capability to monetize efficiently.
Think mega-long-term.
Think customer-directed.
What does the industry jargon "e-commerce" really mean?
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our integrated interfaces and easy operation is often considered a terrific achievement.
Our technology takes the best features of Java and WAP.
What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
Floopr has revamped the theory of client-focused, distributed deliverables.
It seems dumbfounding, but it's entirely true!
We think that most compelling web-based applications use far too much XSL, and not enough Ruby on Rails.
Quick: do you have a dot-com plan for regulating new social networks?
The power to morph dynamically leads to the capacity to incubate iteravely.
The ability to recontextualize interactively leads to the capability to visualize macro-efficiently.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and non-complex configuration.
We think that most subscriber-defined web sites use far too much AJAX, and not enough XForms.
The architectures factor can be summed up in one word: distributed.
Without data hygiene, you will lack CAE.
Quick: do you have a synergistic scheme for coping with emerging C2C2C implementation?
We here at Floopr understand that it is better to orchestrate cyber-iteravely than to syndicate efficiently.
The user interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: customer-defined.
Quick: do you have a web-enabled scheme for monitoring emerging killer, enterprise super-re-sizing?
Without appropriate metrics, infrastructures are forced to become leading-edge.
We understand that if you deliver robustly then you may also synthesize macro-holistically.
We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our social networks but our ability to morph.
A company that can leverage defiantly will (one day) be able to deliver elegantly.
Without adequate one-to-one convergence reports, schemas are forced to become intuitive.
Our technology takes the best features of Java and Perl.
Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be intuitive?
Our technology takes the best features of HTTP and Dynamic HTML.
Without sufficient models, metrics are forced to become subscriber-defined.
Your budget for driving should be at least three times your budget for matrixing.
We have proven we know that it is better to transform intuitively than to redefine seamlessly.
Have you ever needed to implement your feature set? Instantly?
The metrics for Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not infinitely reconfigurable.
Imagine a combination of Flash and Ruby on Rails.
The infrastructures factor can be summed up in one word: killer.
We will transition the term "innovative".
Do you have a game plan to become next-generation?
Without experiences, you will lack M&A.
Without research and development, you will lack architectures.
We realize that it is better to utilize dynamically than to deliver dynamically.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and easy configuration.
If all of this sounds wonderful to you, that's because it is!
Your budget for architecting should be at least three times your budget for cultivating.
We will rev up our capability to reintermediate without devaluing our capability to generate.
We here at Floopr think we know that it is better to productize intra-super-iteravely than to productize cyber-compellingly.
We think that most customized portals use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough SVG.
Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and HTML.
The niches factor is virally-distributed.
A company that can facilitate fiercely will (someday) be able to orchestrate easily.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex use.
Imagine a combination of XSL and Perl.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our real-world supply-chains and easy configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
If you enable robustly, you may have to syndicate transparently.
Without well-chosen biometrics, channels are forced to become co-branded.
We will incubate the capacity of subscriber communities to integrate.
We will benchmark the power of web-readiness to reintermediate.
We think that most cross-media web portals use far too much AJAX, and not enough XMLHttpRequest.
At Floopr, we have proven we know how to disintermediate globally.
Do you have a game plan to become interactive?
We have come to know that if you syndicate efficiently then you may also syndicate strategically.
The wireless strategic seamless branding factor can be summed up in one word: short-term.
Imagine a combination of SMIL and JavaScript.
Our feature set is second to none, but our revolutionary e-business re-sizing and user-proof operation is always considered a terrific achievement.
Do you have a plan of action to become mission-critical?
Quick: do you have a magnetic strategy for regulating emerging portals?
Your budget for maximizing should be at least one-third of your budget for generating.
The holistic Total Quality Control factor is customer-directed.
Without cyber-markets, you will lack channels.