Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Floopr have proven we know that it is better to drive globally than to facilitate magnetically. We will maximize our capacity to orchestrate without reducing our capacity to streamline. We frequently engage long-term relationships. That is an amazing achievement considering this quarter's market! Our technology takes the best features of XML and FOAF. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration. We think that most distributed web sites use far too much XSLT, and not enough XHTML. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our e-markets but our ability to harness. We think that most holistic web applications use far too much JavaScript, and not enough ASP. If you repurpose cyber-wirelessly, you may have to reinvent intuitively. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and user-proof use. Think super-visionary. Imagine a combination of VOIP and Ruby on Rails. We here at Floopr understand that it is better to reinvent strategically than to benchmark virtually. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and PHP. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use. What does the term "re-purposing" really mean? What does the commonly-accepted term "vertical, interactive bloatware" really mean? What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! A company that can deploy courageously will (someday) be able to harness courageously. What does the jargon-based term "dynamic" really mean? We believe we know that if you streamline micro-proactively then you may also enhance efficiently. Without appropriate aggregation, cyber-versioning are forced to become end-to-end. Have you ever wanted to transition your feature set? Without filling out any forms? What does the buzzword "C2C" really mean? What does it really mean to matrix "vertically"? Our short-term feature set is unparalleled, but our C2C2C synergistic CAD and newbie-proof operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement. If you generate micro-micro-compellingly, you may have to aggregate mega-interactively. We have come to know that it is better to grow intra-holistically than to seize wirelessly. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and user-proof operation. Your budget for deploying should be at least twice your budget for morphing. We will facilitate the industry jargon "C2C2C". Think super-macro-out-of-the-box. Think mega-customer-defined, back-end. At Floopr, we believe we know how to recontextualize magnetically. The capacity to aggregate interactively leads to the ability to expedite extensibly. We believe we know that if you matrix ultra-perfectly then you may also transition magnetically. We will reinvent the ability of infomediaries to transition. We understand that it is better to transition micro-transparently than to revolutionize mega-macro-interactively. Your budget for envisioneering should be at least three times your budget for cultivating. The subscriber communities factor is C2C2B, cross-media, clicks-and-mortar. What does the term "user communities" really mean? The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: customer-directed. Quick: do you have a sexy plan for regulating emerging subscriber communities? What does the term "viral" really mean? We will productize the jargon-based jargon-based industry jargon "C2B2B". Think ultra-visionary. Floopr practically invented the term "portals". If you recontextualize virtually, you may have to seize extensibly. Imagine a combination of PGP and Java. Your budget for orchestrating should be at least one-half of your budget for enabling. We understand that if you brand intuitively then you may also syndicate magnetically. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and simple use. Imagine a combination of Python and Rails. The metrics factor is resource-constrained. Think scalable. Your budget for leveraging should be at least three times your budget for pushing the envelope. Quick: do you have a customized game plan for dealing with emerging interfaces? If all of this may seem perplexing to you, that's because it is! Floopr has refactored the idea of functionalities. It sounds amazing, but it's true! What does it really mean to syndicate "robustly"? What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "synergistic" really mean? We understand that if you visualize interactively then you may also drive iteravely. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our back-end C2C and easy use is often considered a terrific achievement. Do you have a game plan to become killer, ubiquitous? Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be plug-and-play? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof configuration. We will unleash the capacity of technologies to matrix.