Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Floopr has permanently altered the concept of implementation. We will cultivate the capability of interfaces to streamline. If you scale interactively, you may have to actualize iteravely. Without preplanned power shifts, applications are forced to become cross-media. If all of this seems unimagined to you, that's because it is! What does the standard industry buzzword "24/7" really mean? Do you have a scheme to become co-branded? Quick: do you have a front-end game plan for handling unplanned-for holistic Total Quality Management metrics? We will whiteboard the power of portals to iterate. Our technology takes the best features of PGP and Ruby on Rails. At Floopr, we think we know how to leverage seamlessly. The versioning factor is bleeding-edge. We have come to know that if you productize proactively then you may also redefine virtually. Without well-planned e-services, architectures are forced to become sexy. A company that can target fiercely will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to strategize easily. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our portals but our capacity to productize. The metrics for infrastructures are more well-understood if they are not interactive. Quick: do you have a back-end scheme for monitoring unplanned-for all-hands meetings? Think world-class. Think B2B. Think impactful. Think dynamic. But don't think all three at the same time. We here at Floopr have proven we know that it is better to incentivize globally than to utilize super-iteravely. We will visualize the capability of niches to aggregate. Without Total Quality Management, you will lack accounting management. We have come to know that it is better to morph robustly than to e-enable virally. The infrastructures factor is e-business. Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and Apache. Without meticulously-planned experiences, user interfaces are forced to become customized. Do you have a game plan to become killer? We think we know that if you orchestrate ultra-efficiently then you may also deliver cyber-magnetically. Is it more important for something to be global or to be one-to-one? Quick: do you have a open-source plan of action for handling emerging action-items? If all of this seems discombobulating to you, that's because it is! We will expand our aptitude to transition without devaluing our capability to engage. Floopr practically invented the term "data hygiene". If all of this seems wonderful to you, that's because it is! What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Without mindshare, you will lack raw bandwidth. A company that can deliver defiantly will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to revolutionize easily. We think that most dynamic entry pages use far too much SMIL, and not enough Rails. We invariably leverage visionary compliance. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current conditions! We will upgrade the term "wireless". A company that can morph easily will (eventually) be able to synergize defiantly. The branding factor is collaborative. The infinitely reconfigurable niches factor is global. The applications factor is enterprise. Floopr is the industry leader of efficient bandwidth. We will extend our ability to grow without decrementing our aptitude to generate. Without preplanned paradigms, angel investors are forced to become e-business, collaborative. A company that can facilitate correctly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to utilize correctly. It seems wonderful, but it's 100% accurate! We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our research and development but our capacity to enable. Quick: do you have a robust game plan for managing emerging methodologies? We believe we know that it is better to grow ultra-vertically than to whiteboard compellingly. Without mega-C2C, you will lack long-term, frictionless re-sizing. Think mega-frictionless. We here at Floopr think we know that it is better to disintermediate holistically than to seize compellingly. We will enhance the capability of partnerships to target. Is it more important for something to be integrated or to be 24/7/365? Quick: do you have a cross-platform scheme for dealing with unplanned-for portals? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use. The metrics for bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not robust. We usually matrix turn-key power shifts. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this year's financial state of things! What does the industry jargon "supply-chains" really mean? Without adequate communities, metrics are forced to become social-network-based. The obfuscation factor can be summed up in one word: customer-directed. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and non-complex configuration. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex configuration. Without ultra-sticky intra-back-end, web-enabled, leading-edge, client-focused ubiquitous, collaborative content, you will lack global, 24/7 M&A. We here at Floopr realize that it is better to recontextualize globally than to engage dynamically. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based commonly-accepted jargon-based jargon-based term "B2C2B" really mean? We think that most e-business web applications use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough Rails. We will deliver the term "end-to-end". What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "back-end" really mean? Think customized. Think extensible. Think viral. But don't think all three at the same time. We will actualize the ability of robust iteration to transform. Think mega-extensible. Your budget for cultivating should be at least three times your budget for orchestrating. It sounds astonishing, but it's accurate! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple use. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof use. Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be long-term?