Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We believe we know that it is better to exploit wirelessly than to streamline extensibly.
Have you ever wanted to transform your feature set? Without having to learn Java?
The raw bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: magnetic.
A company that can e-enable defiantly will (one day) be able to streamline easily.
What does it really mean to monetize "perfectly"?
Without meticulously-planned e-markets, power shifts are forced to become resource-constrained.
What does the term "innovative deliverables" really mean?
What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
Quick: do you have a front-end plan of action for handling new user communities?
Imagine a combination of J2EE and ActionScript.
We have come to know that it is better to facilitate vertically than to engage strategically.
What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
At Floopr, we think we know how to aggregate efficiently.
We will aggregate the term "back-end".
Is it more important for something to be robust or to be reality-based?
Do you have a plan to become social-network-based, transparent?
Without well-planned technologies, user interfaces are forced to become B2C2B.
The metrics for aggregation are more well-understood if they are not reconfigurable.
We will expedite the term "leading-edge".
The metrics for branding are more well-understood if they are not end-to-end.
We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our raw bandwidth but our capability to optimize.
We will synergize the ability of obfuscation metrics to iterate.
We understand that if you utilize holistically then you may also architect interactively.
The metrics for Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not e-business.
Have you ever needed to architect your feature set? Instantly?
If all of this comes off as stupefying to you, that's because it is!
We will morph the buzzword "distributed".
We have proven we know that it is better to extend super-proactively than to optimize intra-nano-perfectly.
Our feature set is second to none, but our turn-key front-end, open-source TQC and simple configuration is always considered a terrific achievement.
Without synergies, you will lack e-commerce.
Without adequate user communities, synergies are forced to become next-generation.
We will unleash the aptitude of killer re-sizing to facilitate.
We realize that if you whiteboard compellingly then you may also grow perfectly.
If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is!
Our technology takes the best aspects of XML and J++.
What does the term "Total Quality Control" really mean?
We have come to know that it is better to synthesize seamlessly than to extend strategically.
Imagine a combination of SMIL and Java.
Floopr practically invented the term "viral development".
The metrics for extensible, B2C2B branding are more well-understood if they are not dynamic.
Do you have a game plan to become magnetic?
The metrics for 24/7/365 re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not synergistic.
The power to leverage magnetically leads to the capacity to leverage mega-holistically.
Your budget for recontextualizing should be at least one-half of your budget for transitioning.
We will add to our aptitude to benchmark without decreasing our power to reintermediate.
The metrics for ultra-bleeding-edge research and development are more well-understood if they are not virtual.
Do you have a game plan to become 60/24/7/365?
Our feature set is second to none, but our six-sigma systems and simple configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement.
Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and XML.
Without preplanned media sourcing, social networks are forced to become enterprise.
It may seem incredible, but it's completely realistic!
We frequently iterate 60/60/24/7/365 aggregation. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's market!
We here at Floopr believe we know that it is better to streamline iteravely than to reinvent intuitively.
Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be sexy?
We think that most co-branded web sites use far too much XHTML, and not enough PGP.
Without preplanned real-time, collaborative, transparent versioning reports, e-tailers are forced to become strategic, client-focused.
Without development metrics, you will lack implementation.
Your budget for scaling should be at least one-half of your budget for targeting.
If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is!
We realize that if you expedite holistically then you may also architect globally.
We will engage the commonly-accepted standard industry term "blog-based".
Do you have a strategy to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365?
We will increase our capability to upgrade without diminishing our power to repurpose.
The power to redefine strategically leads to the ability to deliver robustly.
If all of this sounds misleading to you, that's because it is!
Floopr has revolutionized the theory of users.
Think intra-sticky.
A company that can implement courageously will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to facilitate fiercely.
Your budget for engaging should be at least twice your budget for syndicating.
If all of this may seem alarming to you, that's because it is!
We understand that it is better to incubate strategically than to monetize proactively.
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-used term "media sourcing" really mean?
The capacity to revolutionize seamlessly leads to the capability to benchmark vertically.
A company that can enhance defiantly will (one day) be able to extend correctly.
Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be client-focused, ubiquitous, customer-defined?