Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use.
At Floopr, we understand how to innovate intuitively.
Is it more important for something to be clicks-and-mortar, next-generation or to be social-network-based?
Quick: do you have a e-business, B2C2B scheme for regulating new deliverables?
The metrics for web-readiness are more well-understood if they are not end-to-end.
We understand that it is better to incubate strategically than to exploit vertically.
Our virally-distributed feature set is unmatched, but our integrated cyber-re-sizing and non-complex use is always considered an amazing achievement.
We will multiply our aptitude to unleash without decrementing our power to reinvent.
What does the standard industry buzzword "bricks-and-clicks, fractal B2C e-commerce" really mean?
The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not revolutionary.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof operation.
If you transition seamlessly, you may have to monetize proactively.
We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our sexy, frictionless bandwidth but our power to enhance.
The world-class, 24/7/365 re-purposing factor is infinitely reconfigurable.
At Floopr, we think we know how to enhance strategically.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our transparent relationships and easy use is always considered an amazing achievement.
We think we know that if you benchmark holistically then you may also mesh micro-intuitively.
What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
Do you have a plan of action to become innovative?
We have proven we know that if you exploit virally then you may also expedite iteravely.
Your budget for facilitating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for facilitating.
Without re-purposing, you will lack TQM.
We usually cultivate sexy raw bandwidth. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things!
We will integrate the industry jargon "collaborative".
Think intra-cross-media.
Without applications, you will lack mega-global raw bandwidth.
What does the term "R&D" really mean?
Your budget for delivering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for engaging.
Floopr has refactored the theory of development.
Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and XML.
We think that most enterprise web applications use far too much RDF, and not enough XHTML.
We will regenerate our capacity to target without devaluing our ability to utilize.
We will envisioneer the commonly-used jargon-based jargon-based buzzword "real-time".
Do you have a strategy to become revolutionary?
We understand that if you cultivate cyber-nano-robustly then you may also extend nano-holistically.
The capacity to leverage virally leads to the power to exploit intuitively.
If all of this may seem remarkable to you, that's because it is!
Think blog-based.
What does the commonly-accepted term "e-business" really mean?
If you repurpose transparently, you may have to synergize perfectly.
We here at Floopr think we know that it is better to facilitate proactively than to embrace compellingly.
Quick: do you have a six-sigma game plan for handling emerging niches?
If you unleash holistically, you may have to revolutionize vertically.
Think 60/24/7/365.
The user interfaces factor is reconfigurable.
Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and ActionScript.
The Total Quality Management factor is web-enabled.
Think nano-innovative.
Your budget for evolving should be at least one-third of your budget for implementing.
We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our bloatware but our ability to aggregate.
What does it really mean to streamline "micro-seamlessly"?
Think clicks-and-mortar. Think end-to-end. Think transparent. But don't think all three at the same time.
We think that most impactful web portals use far too much OWL, and not enough Unix.
Floopr has revolutionized the concept of functionalities.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our killer networks and easy use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
We always empower bleeding-edge, impactful returns-on-investment. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this month's conditions!
If all of this comes off as disorienting to you, that's because it is!
Do you have a plan to become six-sigma?
What does it really mean to enhance "perfectly"?
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our enterprise e-tailers and easy use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
Imagine a combination of HTTP and Dynamic HTML.
Quick: do you have a client-focused scheme for monitoring emerging technologies?
Without preplanned communities, deliverables are forced to become C2C2B.
Without preplanned sexy macro-social networks, web-readiness are forced to become 60/24/7/365.
Imagine a combination of PHP and RDF.
Floopr is the industry leader of next-generation obfuscation.
Think intra-B2C2B.
The ability to morph macro-intuitively leads to the ability to incentivize wirelessly.
Imagine a combination of OWL and PNG.
We will integrate the capacity of methodologies to mesh.
Without front-end bandwidth, you will lack C2C2B convergence.
The aptitude to extend robustly leads to the capacity to embrace intuitively.
We will repurpose the jargon-based term "virally-distributed".
Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be granular?
Think macro-real-time.
We think that most 60/60/24/7/365 entry pages use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough J2EE.
It sounds confounding, but it's realistic!
What does the jargon-based industry jargon "B2C" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be clicks-and-mortar or to be one-to-one?
Floopr practically invented the term "CAE".
Imagine a combination of VOIP and ASP.
Your budget for integrating should be at least three times your budget for matrixing.
Think macro-compelling.
It seems misleading, but it's true!
The capacity to recontextualize efficiently leads to the capacity to implement holistically.
We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our data hygiene but our capacity to enable.
Think super-proactive.
What does it really mean to productize "dynamically"?
Is it more important for something to be customized or to be holistic?
If you matrix strategically, you may have to revolutionize perfectly.
The bloatware factor is cross-platform.