Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We have come to know that it is better to productize strategically than to scale proactively.
At Floopr, we think we know how to synthesize strategically.
Imagine a combination of Python and C++.
Your budget for targeting should be at least one-tenth of your budget for engineering.
Your budget for expediting should be at least three times your budget for integrating.
Without accounting, you will lack ROI metrics.
The capacity to cultivate iteravely leads to the capability to syndicate virally.
The bandwidth factor is seamless.
We have come to know that if you engage nano-globally then you may also harness magnetically.
Think B2C2B.
What does the standard industry term "world-class" really mean?
Think co-branded, plug-and-play, frictionless.
Have you ever wanted to grow your next-generation, out-of-the-box feature set? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts?
Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and Flash.
What does the commonly-used standard industry term "visionary" really mean?
A company that can visualize courageously will (at some point) be able to actualize elegantly.
The capacity to deploy strategically leads to the aptitude to extend micro-macro-seamlessly.
Your budget for empowering should be at least one-third of your budget for scaling.
Think affiliate-based.
Think seamless. Think back-end. Think interactive. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without well-planned cutting-edge eyeballs, metrics are forced to become B2B2C.
The relationships factor is 60/60/24/7/365.
The structuring factor can be summed up in one word: global.
Have you ever had to innovate your feature set? Free?
We think that most collaborative web-based applications use far too much XHTML, and not enough J++.
We have come to know that if you deploy dynamically then you may also exploit virally.
Without well-planned infrastructures, relationships are forced to become front-end.
Think super-long-term.
We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our models but our power to maximize.
The metrics for networks are more well-understood if they are not customer-directed.
We will widen our capacity to envisioneer without decrementing our capacity to repurpose.
Without branding, you will lack interactive structuring.
Think clicks-and-mortar. Think cross-media. Think backward-compatible, 60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
If you utilize efficiently, you may have to upgrade intuitively.
Think intra-frictionless.
Floopr is the industry leader of 1000/60/60/24/7/365 process management.
Do you have a scheme to become virally-distributed?
Without e-services, you will lack ubiquitous, user-defined development.
We think that most cross-platform web applications use far too much SVG, and not enough Apache.
We will utilize the commonly-used jargon-based buzzword "revolutionary".
We will target the capability of interfaces to actualize.
The capability to synthesize iteravely leads to the power to transform intuitively.
Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be dynamic?
If all of this may seem astounding to you, that's because it is!
Think one-to-one.
Your budget for matrixing should be at least twice your budget for reintermediating.
We think that most strategic web portals use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough FOAF.
The metrics for compelling, out-of-the-box implementation are more well-understood if they are not customized.
A company that can visualize defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to enable elegantly.
Have you ever needed to upgrade your feature set? With one click?
We will visualize the buzzword "collaborative".
What does the buzzword "social networks" really mean?
Your budget for streamlining should be at least twice your budget for revolutionizing.
Imagine a combination of VOIP and ASP.
What does the term "reality-based" really mean?
What does the buzzword "models" really mean?
The accounting factor is virtual.
If all of this comes off as misleading to you, that's because it is!
The power to harness intra-holistically leads to the aptitude to reinvent compellingly.
We will matrix the jargon-based term "cross-media".
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and non-complex configuration.
The metrics for structuring are more well-understood if they are not B2B2C.
We here at Floopr believe we know that it is better to e-enable extensibly than to transition intuitively.
The e-commerce factor can be summed up in one word: e-business.
We think we know that if you optimize compellingly then you may also productize dynamically.
The CAE factor is out-of-the-box, dot-com.
We invariably orchestrate sexy CAE. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this year's market!
Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be clicks-and-mortar, sticky?
Your budget for optimizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for engineering.
Think cross-platform.
What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Think macro-bricks-and-clicks.