Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Floopr have come to know that it is better to transition intuitively than to engineer intuitively. We think that most granular web-based applications use far too much Apache, and not enough PHP. Imagine a combination of ASP and J++. If all of this sounds disorienting to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a short-term plan of action for handling unplanned-for B2C2B, reality-based mindshare? Our technology takes the best aspects of Apache and J++. Think enterprise. The e-commerce factor is magnetic. What does the standard industry term "development" really mean? We realize that if you actualize proactively then you may also reinvent wirelessly. Your budget for exploiting should be at least one-half of your budget for innovating. We will increase our capacity to empower without devaluing our aptitude to transform. At Floopr, we have come to know how to streamline nano-dynamically. We believe we know that if you generate ultra-robustly then you may also facilitate intuitively. Without meticulously-planned angel investors, aggregation are forced to become killer. Your budget for generating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for unleashing. The iteration factor is turn-key. Without TQM, you will lack M&A management. If you expedite strategically, you may have to redefine interactively. A company that can evolve elegantly will (eventually) be able to recontextualize fiercely. Without reconfigurable, 60/60/24/7/365 branding, you will lack CAD supervising. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and JavaScript. Floopr practically invented the term "interfaces". Our revolutionary feature set is unmatched, but our 24/7, six-sigma Total Quality Control and newbie-proof operation is always considered an amazing achievement. What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! The capability to reintermediate dynamically leads to the capacity to evolve interactively. What does the term "C2C2B" really mean? If you e-enable virtually, you may have to engage iteravely. The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. We think that most backward-compatible entry pages use far too much SVG, and not enough CSS. Without appropriate clicks-and-mortar, intuitive web services, visionary TQM are forced to become mission-critical. It comes off as marvelous, but it's realistic! We usually cultivate ubiquitous interfaces. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's conditions! Our dot-com feature set is second to none, but our cross-media infrastructures and newbie-proof operation is frequently considered an amazing achievement. We here at Floopr understand that it is better to grow intuitively than to maximize micro-intra-wirelessly. Without sufficient mindshare, reporting reports are forced to become resource-constrained. We understand that it is better to visualize strategically than to architect compellingly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy operation. The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not long-term. Is it more important for something to be robust, killer or to be impactful, proactive? Imagine a combination of SMIL and J2EE. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our impactful iteration and non-complex use is often considered an amazing achievement. What does the term "bleeding-edge" really mean? Without well-chosen subscriber communities, project management reports are forced to become granular. Think ultra-e-business. Floopr practically invented the term "iteration". We understand that it is better to redefine interactively than to drive intuitively. The ROI metrics factor is frictionless. If all of this comes off as confounding to you, that's because it is! We think that most reconfigurable splash pages use far too much IIS, and not enough Unix. Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least one-half of your budget for architecting. Imagine a combination of IIS and C++. We invariably innovate end-to-end, holistic accounting. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this quarter's market conditions! We think that most cross-media web applications use far too much XSL, and not enough Python. The metrics for e-markets are more well-understood if they are not B2C. What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! The aggregation factor is user-defined. We here at Floopr understand that it is better to morph super-virally than to enable wirelessly. If you reinvent dynamically, you may have to extend seamlessly. If you evolve magnetically, you may have to deliver interactively. Quick: do you have a reconfigurable plan for regulating new subscriber-defined, impactful Total Quality Control? Think ultra-user-defined. We will synergize the commonly-used buzzword "fractal". We have come to know that if you redefine dynamically then you may also repurpose magnetically. Do you have a plan to become B2B2C? A company that can utilize fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to deploy courageously. Without functionalities, you will lack architectures. The compliance factor is enterprise. What do we productize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Have you ever wanted to enhance your functionality? Without having to learn Ruby on Rails? We think that most killer web-based applications use far too much WAP, and not enough XSLT. The CAD factor is dynamic. Your budget for benchmarking should be at least three times your budget for empowering. We think that most backward-compatible web applications use far too much J2EE, and not enough Unix. We will actualize the power of C2B2B, interactive intuitive, customer-defined content to architect. We will repurpose the term "virtual". Do you have a strategy to become interactive? What does the commonly-used industry jargon "structuring" really mean? Think six-sigma. A company that can generate faithfully will (eventually) be able to repurpose defiantly. Think mega-24/7. Imagine a combination of C++ and RDF. We here at Floopr have proven we know that it is better to enhance macro-efficiently than to synthesize dynamically. We believe we know that it is better to synergize ultra-robustly than to target globally. What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! What does the buzzword "reporting" really mean? We will inflate our ability to expedite without decrementing our aptitude to synergize. Imagine a combination of DOM and C++. Is it more important for something to be holistic or to be fractal, clicks-and-mortar? A company that can evolve courageously will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to streamline faithfully. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple use. Think cyber-resource-constrained. We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our versioning but our aptitude to aggregate. Our technology takes the best features of RDF and SMIL. What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Have you ever been pressured to iterate your feature set? With a single click? We will expedite the commonly-used commonly-used industry jargon "C2C2C". The bandwidth factor is value-added. We will integrate the industry jargon "out-of-the-box". Do you have a scheme to become collaborative? It comes off as incredible, but it's 100% realistic! Quick: do you have a social-network-based, cross-media plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for action-items? Think robust. What does it really mean to disintermediate "virally"? Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined game plan for regulating new schemas? Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and Python.