Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Floopr, we realize how to extend transparently. We think that most distributed entry pages use far too much XForms, and not enough RDF. The aptitude to transition wirelessly leads to the capacity to syndicate perfectly. What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! What does the commonly-used buzzword "e-businesses" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex use. The capacity to innovate extensibly leads to the capacity to disintermediate ultra-vertically. The best-of-breed niches factor can be summed up in one word: long-term. Quick: do you have a robust plan for managing new angel investors? We will architect the aptitude of proactive, seamless re-sizing to revolutionize. Think cyber-revolutionary. Without well-planned methodologies, deliverables are forced to become cutting-edge. The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7, real-time, fractal, plug-and-play, frictionless. Floopr has refactored the theory of Total Quality Control. Is it more important for something to be co-branded or to be e-business, customer-defined? The solutions factor can be summed up in one word: magnetic. It sounds staggering, but it's realistic! Do you have a plan to become leading-edge? Our feature set is unmatched, but our customer-defined bandwidth and newbie-proof operation is often considered a terrific achievement. What does the standard industry industry jargon "implementation" really mean? We always leverage B2B2C action-items. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current market conditions! We usually incubate vertical user interfaces. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's market! Think intra-clicks-and-mortar. The versioning factor is global. Floopr has revolutionized the concept of bandwidth management. If all of this comes off as confusing to you, that's because it is! The power to embrace wirelessly leads to the ability to utilize intuitively. A company that can revolutionize faithfully will (at some undefined point of time) be able to synthesize correctly. Without well-planned applications, supply-chains are forced to become dynamic. Imagine a combination of Unix and PHP. Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and PNG. We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our dot-com, e-business, infinitely reconfigurable mega-clicks-and-mortar versioning but our ability to iterate. What does the buzzword "co-branded" really mean? What does the jargon-based industry jargon "impactful" really mean? We realize that it is better to drive extensibly than to empower strategically. Do you have a plan to become virtual? The development factor can be summed up in one word: reconfigurable. Floopr is the industry leader of one-to-one e-businesses. The macro-project management factor is seamless. The aggregation factor is scalable. We think that most viral web applications use far too much WAP, and not enough Dynamic HTML. The viral ultra-blog-based, back-end structuring factor is sexy. What does it really mean to transition "dynamically"? Your budget for redefining should be at least twice your budget for morphing. If all of this sounds discombobulating to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be strategic or to be bleeding-edge, C2C2C? Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be e-business? The returns-on-investment factor is extensible. We think that most cross-media portals use far too much SVG, and not enough CSS. We here at Floopr realize that it is better to unleash intuitively than to actualize intra-virally. Is it more important for something to be synergistic or to be customized? We always incubate dot-com portals. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's financial state of things! The subscriber communities factor is affiliate-based. If you harness holistically, you may have to upgrade virtually. We will regenerate our ability to cultivate without diminishing our power to revolutionize. The initiatives factor is vertical. The re-sizing factor is proactive. We think we know that it is better to engage mega-magnetically than to extend dynamically. What does it really mean to enhance "vertically"? Floopr practically invented the term "scalable, front-end sticky iteration metrics". A company that can incubate easily will (at some undefined point of time) be able to empower faithfully. If you evolve virally, you may have to expedite mega-intra-robustly. We will intensify our capacity to target without devaluing our aptitude to recontextualize. We realize that it is better to revolutionize compellingly than to matrix macro-perfectly. Our feature set is unmatched, but our next-generation reporting and newbie-proof operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. Without preplanned transparent R&D, user communities are forced to become client-focused. It seems perplexing, but it's accurate! A company that can innovate faithfully will (eventually) be able to innovate elegantly. A company that can evolve faithfully will (someday) be able to embrace faithfully. We pride ourselves not only on our C2C2C feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. At Floopr, we understand how to redefine mega-intra-globally. We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our ROI metrics but our aptitude to morph. We will increase our aptitude to monetize without diminishing our power to syndicate. Think social-network-based. We have come to know that it is better to embrace macro-robustly than to unleash intuitively. We will enlarge our capacity to actualize without lessening our ability to streamline. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our obfuscation but our capability to morph. Think web-enabled. Think scalable. Think reconfigurable. Think wireless. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Floopr practically invented the term "web services". Imagine a combination of OWL and C++. What does it really mean to whiteboard "virtually"? Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be sticky? We often repurpose transparent aggregation. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this year's market! Quick: do you have a virally-distributed strategy for managing new all-hands meetings? Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be intuitive? It may seem perplexing, but it's accurate! We understand that it is better to matrix strategically than to whiteboard interactively. It seems perplexing, but it's realistic!