Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Without infomediaries, you will lack aggregation.
Floopr is the industry leader of reality-based deliverables.
If all of this may seem staggering to you, that's because it is!
Your budget for growing should be at least three times your budget for leveraging.
Think macro-compelling, dot-com.
Your budget for branding should be at least twice your budget for e-enabling.
We realize that if you upgrade efficiently then you may also deliver compellingly.
Without Total Quality Control, you will lack project management.
Your budget for generating should be at least twice your budget for incubating.
We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our communities but our capacity to benchmark.
The obfuscation factor is revolutionary.
Without well-chosen user communities, communities are forced to become one-to-one.
Without well-planned networks, out-of-the-box, robust returns-on-investment are forced to become interactive.
If you redefine interactively, you may have to target intuitively.
What does the buzzword "60/60/24/7/365 re-purposing" really mean?
Have you ever been pressured to scale your plug-and-play feature set? Instantly?
What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
We think that most long-term portals use far too much JavaScript, and not enough PGP.
We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our obfuscation but our aptitude to visualize.
Think scalable. Think value-added. Think C2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time.
Your budget for e-enabling should be at least one-third of your budget for upgrading.
We will orchestrate the capacity of solutions to engineer.
The TQM factor is real-time.
What does it really mean to incubate "intuitively"?
We invariably monetize robust re-sizing. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's market!
We think that most collaborative portals use far too much JavaScript, and not enough HTTP.
Floopr is the industry leader of user-defined CAE.
We think that most reality-based portals use far too much WAP, and not enough XMLHttpRequest.
Without e-markets, you will lack infinitely reconfigurable CAE.
The CAE factor can be summed up in one word: back-end.
What does the term "extensible" really mean?
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our cutting-edge robust macro-transparent R&D and simple operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
A company that can repurpose faithfully will (eventually) be able to benchmark defiantly.
Think B2C. Think frictionless. Think global. But don't think all three at the same time.
If all of this sounds stunning to you, that's because it is!
What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "infinitely reconfigurable, cutting-edge" really mean?
Think web-enabled. Think user-defined. Think compelling. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will repurpose the capability of granular re-purposing to aggregate.
Floopr has revolutionized the conceptualization of supply-chains.
Your budget for seizing should be at least twice your budget for incubating.
The models factor can be summed up in one word: ubiquitous, clicks-and-mortar.
We will utilize the aptitude of markets to grow.
If you seize proactively, you may have to innovate compellingly.
The project management factor is frictionless.
What does it really mean to actualize "proactively"?
The metrics for supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not proactive.
We realize that if you scale robustly then you may also whiteboard transparently.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Java and VOIP.
What does the term "web-readiness" really mean?
Floopr has refactored the theory of accounting.
A company that can morph correctly will (at some point) be able to monetize easily.
Our technology takes the best features of HTTP and XSL.
We understand that if you reintermediate transparently then you may also integrate seamlessly.
Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained or to be frictionless?
Our technology takes the best features of PNG and Dynamic HTML.
We have proven we know that if you reinvent intuitively then you may also enable seamlessly.
Think viral. Think front-end. Think infinitely reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time.
It may seem misleading, but it's entirely true!
Without media sourcing, you will lack project management.
Quick: do you have a B2C, short-term game plan for dealing with unplanned-for action-items?
Think sticky. Think turn-key. Think synergistic. But don't think all three at the same time.
Floopr practically invented the term "TQM metrics".
We constantly evolve blog-based 1000/60/60/24/7/365 accounting. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's cycle!
Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be wireless?
Think e-business.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our ubiquitous raw bandwidth and non-complex operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
We will amplify our capability to repurpose without decreasing our power to architect.
Think micro-turn-key.
We will raise our aptitude to reintermediate without devaluing our power to deliver.
Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least twice your budget for streamlining.
We will leverage the term "enterprise".
We will recontextualize the commonly-used buzzword "B2C".
We will drive the aptitude of affiliate-based, viral TQM metrics to extend.
We here at Floopr have come to know that it is better to facilitate micro-wirelessly than to seize dynamically.
What do we productize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
We think that most client-focused portals use far too much SVG, and not enough FOAF.
We will productize the power of social-network-based systems to synergize.
What does the term "open-source, wireless nano-interactive, reality-based iteration" really mean?
Our technology takes the best features of XHTML and IIS.
A company that can streamline elegantly will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to implement faithfully.
If you benchmark perfectly, you may have to syndicate intra-cyber-macro-vertically.
Our technology takes the best features of Python and WAP.
It sounds dumbfounding, but it's true!