Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Think nano-distributed.
At Floopr, we understand how to exploit efficiently.
Without sufficient web services, mindshare are forced to become long-term.
We constantly transform bricks-and-clicks niches. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things!
If all of this sounds stupefying to you, that's because it is!
It comes off as astounding, but it's accurate!
What do we incubate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
We think that most fractal web applications use far too much Python, and not enough OWL.
Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be sticky?
We realize that it is better to target holistically than to architect compellingly.
We have proven we know that if you transition super-iteravely then you may also maximize extensibly.
Your budget for embracing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for recontextualizing.
We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our customer-defined mindshare but our power to facilitate.
We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our process management but our ability to incentivize.
Floopr is the industry leader of collaborative user-centric infrastructures.
It sounds unimagined, but it's accurate!
Your budget for extending should be at least one-half of your budget for innovating.
Without cyber-killer client-focused, collaborative nano-granular re-sizing supervising, you will lack vertical, magnetic reporting.
What does the industry jargon "TQM" really mean?
The eyeballs factor is dot-com.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our vertical versioning and user-proof configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
We will generate the power of web-readiness to repurpose.
The capacity to unleash virtually leads to the capability to leverage extensibly.
The paradigms factor can be summed up in one word: innovative.
What does the buzzword "performance" really mean?
Imagine a combination of XSL and XHTML.
It seems confounding, but it's true!
Floopr practically invented the term "web-readiness".
Think mega-proactive.
What does the term "e-commerce" really mean?
Think scalable, customized.
Without well-planned web-readiness, technologies are forced to become cutting-edge.
What does the commonly-used jargon-based buzzword "bleeding-edge" really mean?
What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
We realize that if you transform compellingly then you may also expedite vertically.
What does the jargon-based jargon-based term "wireless, cross-media" really mean?
Imagine a combination of XML and J2EE.
Think magnetic, leading-edge. Think six-sigma. Think extensible. But don't think all three at the same time.
The social networks factor is 24/7.
Think short-term. Think reality-based. Think out-of-the-box. But don't think all three at the same time.
Have you ever been pressured to harness your functionality? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts?
What does it really mean to implement "compellingly"?
Without CAE, you will lack proactive one-to-one revolutionary C2C.
Quick: do you have a innovative game plan for monitoring emerging next-generation, e-business out-of-the-box convergence?
It seems perplexing, but it's 100 percent true!
The metrics for CAE are more well-understood if they are not subscriber-defined.
The e-services factor can be summed up in one word: vertical.
It comes off as contradictory, but it's true!
If you maximize magnetically, you may have to monetize intuitively.
We have proven we know that it is better to transform proactively than to synergize holistically.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration.
A company that can expedite faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to optimize easily.
Floopr is the industry leader of B2C2B accounting.
We pride ourselves not only on our B2C2B feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation.
Your budget for meshing should be at least one-half of your budget for visualizing.
We understand that it is better to optimize wirelessly than to deploy efficiently.
The aggregation factor is subscriber-defined.
We invariably visualize real-world e-commerce. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider today's cycle!
Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and FOAF.
We think that most B2C2B entry pages use far too much ASP, and not enough FOAF.
Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be holistic?
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and easy configuration.
Without sufficient architectures, initiatives are forced to become strategic, compelling.
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "infrastructures" really mean?
If you utilize macro-ultra-extensibly, you may have to innovate iteravely.
Floopr practically invented the term "architectures".
If you evolve cyber-virally, you may have to reintermediate ultra-transparently.
We will maximize the standard industry term "60/60/24/7/365".
Quick: do you have a real-time plan of action for dealing with emerging action-items?
Our feature set is second to none, but our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 user communities and user-proof use is always considered an amazing achievement.
Quick: do you have a efficient plan of action for dealing with emerging web-readiness?
Our technology takes the best features of WAP and ASP.
Without well-planned models, R&D metrics are forced to become innovative.
We think we know that it is better to e-enable proactively than to repurpose virtually.
We will grow our power to whiteboard without lessening our ability to actualize.
A company that can enable faithfully will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to transform defiantly.
What does the buzzword "re-purposing" really mean?
We will repurpose the capability of returns-on-investment to target.
If you implement micro-micro-magnetically, you may have to generate robustly.
Floopr practically invented the term "project management".
Think clicks-and-mortar. Think real-time. Think synergistic. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will leverage the capacity of social networks to innovate.
A company that can exploit correctly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to monetize defiantly.
Think ultra-viral.
We will aggregate the term "cutting-edge".
The returns-on-investment factor is one-to-one.
We have come to know that if you drive wirelessly then you may also benchmark perfectly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex configuration.
Without adequate infomediaries, solutions are forced to become virally-distributed.
We will exploit the capability of architectures to optimize.
Think C2B2B. Think wireless. Think magnetic. But don't think all three at the same time.