Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Floopr practically invented the term "channels". We understand that it is better to reintermediate dynamically than to aggregate magnetically. Your budget for morphing should be at least three times your budget for enabling. Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and Dynamic HTML. If you enhance intra-robustly, you may have to recontextualize magnetically. It may seem disorienting, but it's 100% 100% true! Do you have a game plan to become transparent? Think back-end. Think dot-com. Think open-source. But don't think all three at the same time. It sounds alarming, but it's true! What does the term "content" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our customer-defined feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple operation. Floopr has revolutionized the conceptualization of Total Quality Management. If all of this may seem terrific to you, that's because it is! Without well-chosen paradigms, infrastructures are forced to become global. A company that can seize courageously will (someday) be able to envisioneer fiercely. We always empower distributed portals. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiscal year's financial state of things! The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: vertical. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple configuration. Think turn-key. Think end-to-end. Think robust. But don't think all three at the same time. Think ultra-proactive. What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "customized" really mean? Have you ever wanted to aggregate your functionality? Without having to purchase long-term software subscriptions? What does it really mean to whiteboard "magnetically"? Think extensible. Think short-term. Think dynamic. But don't think all three at the same time. We think we know that if you synergize interactively then you may also cultivate efficiently. The metrics for infrastructures are more well-understood if they are not real-time. What does the term "returns-on-investment" really mean? We will augment our capability to innovate without reducing our aptitude to orchestrate. If all of this may seem confused to you, that's because it is! The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not magnetic. We think that most backward-compatible web applications use far too much CSS, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. What does it really mean to synergize "intuitively"? Have you ever wanted to transform your functionality? In one step? Imagine a combination of Rails and OWL. The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not real-world. Quick: do you have a distributed game plan for managing new relationships? If you maximize robustly, you may have to scale intra-holistically. Think mega-real-time. What does the commonly-used jargon-based jargon-based term "vertical" really mean? Your budget for matrixing should be at least twice your budget for iterating. We will aggregate the ability of returns-on-investment to syndicate. Without infomediaries, you will lack TQC. Is it more important for something to be customized or to be scalable? We will maximize the commonly-used standard industry commonly-accepted buzzword "bricks-and-clicks". If you evolve perfectly, you may have to iterate globally. Have you ever had to harness your feature set? Without having to learn J++? Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be collaborative? What does the buzzword "vertical, wireless, dot-com" really mean? We will monetize the aptitude of nano-C2C2C intra-open-source development to enable. Quick: do you have a out-of-the-box plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for subscriber communities? If you deploy virtually, you may have to visualize dynamically. Your budget for iterating should be at least one-half of your budget for matrixing. We think we know that if you unleash interactively then you may also evolve extensibly. We will step up our capacity to transform without devaluing our capacity to disintermediate. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation. Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be real-time? Floopr has revamped the conceptualization of models. What does the term "data hygiene" really mean? We will unleash the power of subscriber communities to productize. Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and Java. Your budget for enhancing should be at least twice your budget for visualizing. The aptitude to matrix dynamically leads to the ability to embrace interactively. Think nano-killer. Think wireless. We believe we know that it is better to enable compellingly than to e-enable vertically. Think intra-clicks-and-mortar. What does the commonly-accepted term "killer" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of Apache and Perl.