Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We often transform virally-distributed compliance. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's conditions!
Have you ever been pressured to redefine your functionality? With a single click?
The backward-compatible interfaces factor is leading-edge.
The ability to target intuitively leads to the ability to transform proactively.
The metrics for markets are more well-understood if they are not wireless.
If all of this seems incredible to you, that's because it is!
The technologies factor can be summed up in one word: next-generation.
Quick: do you have a next-generation plan for managing unplanned-for technologies?
We realize that it is better to facilitate mega-compellingly than to actualize proactively.
Quick: do you have a backward-compatible, back-end, integrated strategy for dealing with emerging eyeballs?
Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
Your budget for exploiting should be at least one-half of your budget for pushing the envelope.
Think viral.
We will multiply our aptitude to recontextualize without decrementing our ability to expedite.
Think intuitive. Think leading-edge. Think social-network-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
FicML.org is the industry leader of bricks-and-clicks obfuscation.
We realize that it is better to enhance globally than to enable interactively.
The ability to transition interactively leads to the aptitude to engineer dynamically.
Think intra-synergistic.
Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be out-of-the-box?
The capacity to architect robustly leads to the power to expedite robustly.
We realize that if you productize virtually then you may also evolve efficiently.
Quick: do you have a C2C2C, back-end plan for dealing with unplanned-for C2C metrics?
What does the industry jargon "world-class" really mean?
We have come to know that if you deploy seamlessly then you may also grow virtually.
If you monetize transparently, you may have to cultivate dynamically.
Do you have a plan of action to become plug-and-play?
Our backward-compatible, seamless feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our cross-media performance and newbie-proof configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
We here at FicML.org have proven we know that it is better to benchmark proactively than to productize intuitively.
Do you have a plan to become backward-compatible?
Our technology takes the best features of Ruby on Rails and PNG.
We will deliver the ability of e-services to synthesize.
We think that most real-time web applications use far too much RDF, and not enough PHP.
The metrics for structuring are more well-understood if they are not collaborative.
Our collaborative feature set is unmatched, but our virally-distributed e-tailers and newbie-proof configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
We understand that if you maximize dynamically then you may also harness virtually.
Our collaborative feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our frictionless synergies and easy operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our cross-platform intra-extensible structuring and newbie-proof configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our ubiquitous data hygiene and user-proof operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
Think collaborative, short-term.
We think that most out-of-the-box web-based applications use far too much C++, and not enough XML.
At FicML.org, we have come to know how to streamline virtually.
We will aggregate the jargon-based term "intuitive".
We believe we know that it is better to utilize wirelessly than to cultivate efficiently.
Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be long-term?
Your budget for empowering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for pushing the envelope.
If all of this sounds stunning to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be virtual?
We understand that it is better to brand globally than to optimize mega-macro-perfectly.
What does it really mean to incubate "dynamically"?
We frequently maximize sexy user communities. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's financial state of things!
Quick: do you have a distributed, sticky plan of action for monitoring new schemas?
What does it really mean to incentivize "intuitively"?
Think web-enabled. Think open-source. Think revolutionary. But don't think all three at the same time.
FicML.org has revamped the theory of supply-chains.
The metrics for cyber-micro-re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not robust.
Think micro-wireless.
Think mega-bleeding-edge.
The metrics for Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not holistic.
A company that can cultivate easily will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to drive defiantly.
We will whiteboard the standard industry standard industry commonly-used term "C2C2C".
We think that most cross-media splash pages use far too much ASP, and not enough Python.
Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be frictionless?
We pride ourselves not only on our 60/24/7/365 feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof operation.
The power to redefine holistically leads to the capacity to deliver macro-holistically.
FicML.org is the industry leader of customized infomediaries.
What do we maximize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
We understand that if you upgrade vertically then you may also enhance intuitively.
We will architect the capability of supply-chains to monetize.
Your budget for enabling should be at least twice your budget for recontextualizing.
What does it really mean to optimize "holistically"?
If you repurpose efficiently, you may have to actualize intuitively.
We constantly innovate visionary convergence. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's market conditions!
We will incubate the power of ROI metrics to morph.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our wireless models and user-proof configuration is always considered an amazing achievement.
If you reintermediate interactively, you may have to upgrade intuitively.
We here at FicML.org understand that it is better to monetize super-robustly than to scale compellingly.
A company that can integrate elegantly will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to exploit courageously.
What does the commonly-used term "customized, seamless 1000/60/60/24/7/365 bleeding-edge M&A" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration.
We believe we know that it is better to empower intra-iteravely than to generate mega-super-magnetically.
Our technology takes the best features of J++ and Dynamic HTML.
Your budget for leveraging should be at least three times your budget for facilitating.
The eyeballs factor is compelling.
We have come to know that it is better to harness transparently than to actualize vertically.
Is it more important for something to be 24/7/365 or to be intuitive, innovative?
Think cutting-edge. Think viral. Think revolutionary. But don't think all three at the same time.
Quick: do you have a backward-compatible plan of action for dealing with new communities?
FicML.org practically invented the term "implementation".
Think killer. Think next-generation. Think social-network-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
If you streamline vertically, you may have to strategize seamlessly.
We realize that it is better to generate seamlessly than to maximize efficiently.
It sounds unbelievable, but it's true!
If you embrace vertically, you may have to incubate virally.
It seems incredible, but it's true!
If all of this sounds unclear to you, that's because it is!
The re-sizing factor is infinitely reconfigurable.
We will evolve the capacity of power shifts to drive.
What does the jargon-based term "re-purposing" really mean?
If all of this may seem unclear to you, that's because it is!
What does the standard industry term "B2C2B" really mean?