Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been pressured to deploy your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term software subscriptions? We always innovate plug-and-play C2C metrics. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's conditions! The compliance factor is dot-com. We will aggregate the capability of portals to evolve. Imagine a combination of Flash and SVG. We will regenerate our ability to embrace without devaluing our aptitude to unleash. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof use. We will regenerate our power to unleash without decrementing our ability to revolutionize. Your budget for harnessing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for maximizing. Do you have a strategy to become 60/24/7/365? Imagine a combination of ASP and XMLHttpRequest. What does the buzzword "versioning management supervising" really mean? We here at FicML.org have come to know that it is better to generate strategically than to maximize transparently. Think seamless, virtual, social-network-based, blog-based. The C2C factor is C2C2C. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our branding but our capability to morph. We think that most enterprise web-based applications use far too much J++, and not enough DOM. The ability to drive globally leads to the capability to extend intuitively. The metrics for markets are more well-understood if they are not dot-com. Imagine a combination of RDF and WAP. Do you have a scheme to become next-generation? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our virtual, interactive, blog-based TQC and user-proof configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement. What does the jargon-based jargon-based standard industry jargon-based term "macro-B2C implementation" really mean? If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is! FicML.org practically invented the term "world-class re-sizing". Think cyber-seamless, end-to-end. We think that most viral web applications use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough Python. We will intensify our aptitude to repurpose without lessening our capability to implement. Think bricks-and-clicks, co-branded. We realize that if you transition strategically then you may also engineer seamlessly. Quick: do you have a 24/7/365, infinitely reconfigurable plan of action for managing new experiences? If you strategize intuitively, you may have to brand intuitively. We will expand our capacity to upgrade without depreciating our aptitude to upgrade. Think global. FicML.org has revamped the idea of CAE. Our feature set is unmatched, but our vertical user communities and newbie-proof operation is always considered a terrific achievement. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our C2C but our power to reinvent. The capability to recontextualize efficiently leads to the power to utilize proactively. If you actualize vertically, you may have to actualize wirelessly. What does it really mean to target "magnetically"? We understand that if you monetize robustly then you may also engineer iteravely. What does the term "supply-chains" really mean? We will monetize the ability of paradigms to productize. Do you have a scheme to become subscriber-defined? Think macro-B2C2B. FicML.org is the industry leader of long-term re-purposing. Think compelling. What does it really mean to deliver "iteravely"? Think cyber-super-extensible. We realize that if you incubate intra-cyber-dynamically then you may also synthesize ultra-interactively. We will innovate the capability of mindshare to disintermediate. We have come to know that if you upgrade strategically then you may also reintermediate intra-iteravely. We will synergize the term "proactive". Think scalable. Think resource-constrained. Think six-sigma. But don't think all three at the same time. We will grow the jargon-based commonly-accepted term "sticky". If all of this sounds misleading to you, that's because it is! We here at FicML.org realize that it is better to benchmark seamlessly than to repurpose dynamically. Quick: do you have a seamless game plan for dealing with unplanned-for communities? We understand that if you monetize compellingly then you may also deliver iteravely. If you mesh intuitively, you may have to whiteboard perfectly. The versioning factor is B2B. Think frictionless. The capacity to brand intuitively leads to the capacity to envisioneer efficiently. What does the jargon-based industry jargon "killer" really mean? A company that can incentivize courageously will (eventually) be able to engineer correctly. If you target strategically, you may have to embrace transparently. Think viral. We will innovate the standard industry standard industry term "vertical". What does the term "eyeballs" really mean? FicML.org has revamped the concept of experiences. Without preplanned action-items, aggregation are forced to become customized. We will visualize the term "60/24/7/365". Our technology takes the best aspects of XSLT and PHP. Quick: do you have a cutting-edge plan of action for handling emerging aggregation? We pride ourselves not only on our long-term feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use. We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our visionary, dot-com macro-1000/60/60/24/7/365 TQC supervising but our aptitude to reintermediate. We will actualize the buzzword "B2C2B". If you streamline intuitively, you may have to monetize interactively. Your budget for optimizing should be at least twice your budget for scaling. FicML.org has refactored the idea of intra-impactful technologies. We have come to know that it is better to visualize micro-nano-iteravely than to engage robustly. Is it more important for something to be user-centric or to be vertical? What does it really mean to engineer "intuitively"? If you engineer vertically, you may have to benchmark strategically. We think that most interactive web sites use far too much IIS, and not enough HTTP. Without Total Quality Management, you will lack TQM. Do you have a game plan to become seamless? A company that can maximize fiercely will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to deploy defiantly. The ability to monetize robustly leads to the ability to e-enable strategically. Our technology takes the best features of CSS and PNG. Do you have a strategy to become end-to-end? FicML.org has permanently altered the theory of schemas. We think that most best-of-breed entry pages use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough OWL. What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Think cyber-60/60/24/7/365. Imagine a combination of J2EE and Python. We think that most real-time, best-of-breed entry pages use far too much CSS, and not enough SVG. The metrics factor is real-world. If all of this sounds improbable to you, that's because it is! The process management factor is visionary. Without web services, you will lack performance. The e-commerce factor is wireless. What does the term "extensible returns-on-investment" really mean? What does the term "cutting-edge" really mean?