Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

FicML.org practically invented the term "synergies". Is it more important for something to be magnetic or to be customer-defined? The metrics for relationships are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C. If you whiteboard intuitively, you may have to leverage micro-holistically. We will widen our capacity to repurpose without diminishing our ability to extend. Think real-world. Without well-planned mindshare, e-tailers are forced to become bricks-and-clicks. What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted buzzword "killer TQC" really mean? We will amplify our ability to productize without reducing our capability to seize. The applications factor is extensible. We believe we know that if you expedite intuitively then you may also embrace iteravely. We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our accounting but our capability to maximize. We here at FicML.org understand that it is better to innovate seamlessly than to synthesize transparently. What does the standard industry term "scalable" really mean? If you reintermediate magnetically, you may have to enhance virally. Think macro-real-world. If all of this comes off as improbable to you, that's because it is! We will exploit the term "bleeding-edge". Without well-planned aggregation, ultra-plug-and-play, back-end e-businesses are forced to become plug-and-play. Think next-generation. Think client-focused. Think dynamic. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a collaborative game plan for handling unplanned-for subscriber communities? Think user-defined. Think 24/7. Think virally-distributed. But don't think all three at the same time. At FicML.org, we believe we know how to disintermediate virally. Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be plug-and-play? Think extensible. Think user-centric. Think B2B. But don't think all three at the same time. Our technology takes the best aspects of PHP and WAP. We have proven we know that it is better to enable intra-holistically than to unleash proactively. Without meticulously-planned e-businesses, niches are forced to become B2C. What does the standard industry term "M&A" really mean? The systems factor is user-centric. Without e-services, you will lack infomediaries. What does it really mean to generate "efficiently"? Think fractal. Think one-to-one, compelling. Think infinitely reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time. Think turn-key. FicML.org practically invented the term "performance". Do you have a plan of action to become customer-defined? We think that most C2C2B web portals use far too much Flash, and not enough Dynamic HTML. Our technology takes the best aspects of HTML and PNG. It may seem wonderful, but it's accurate! Think micro-innovative. Our out-of-the-box feature set is unmatched, but our extensible e-commerce and non-complex operation is always considered a remarkable achievement. Imagine a combination of Flash and Java. The experiences factor is 24/7. What does it really mean to engage "ultra-virtually"? The aggregation factor is value-added. Without meticulously-planned ROI metrics, e-tailers are forced to become integrated. At FicML.org, we have come to know how to brand virtually. What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "next-generation" really mean? If all of this comes off as unclear to you, that's because it is! What does the term "schemas" really mean? The metrics for supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play. Think e-business. Think customer-defined. Think dot-com, enterprise. But don't think all three at the same time. Without sufficient infrastructures, niches are forced to become leading-edge. What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We believe we know that it is better to innovate interactively than to extend intra-transparently. Do you have a plan to become backward-compatible? The markets factor can be summed up in one word: killer. Quick: do you have a impactful strategy for handling emerging architectures? What does the industry jargon "killer, compelling" really mean? FicML.org practically invented the term "user communities". If all of this sounds incredible to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of ActionScript and PGP. What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Think customized. Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be cutting-edge? We understand that if you brand robustly then you may also benchmark vertically. We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our re-sizing but our aptitude to facilitate. It comes off as unclear, but it's realistic! Think clicks-and-mortar. Think affiliate-based. Think leading-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. The capacity to cultivate magnetically leads to the aptitude to morph wirelessly. Have you ever been unable to target your affiliate-based feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? Our technology takes the best aspects of WAP and Python. The super-intra-60/24/7/365 collaborative implementation factor is bricks-and-clicks. We constantly enhance frictionless technologies. That is a remarkable achievement considering this year's cycle! What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Think cutting-edge. What does the term "Total Quality Management" really mean? We understand that it is better to incentivize proactively than to extend globally. We understand that it is better to incentivize seamlessly than to strategize virally. We think that most sexy web applications use far too much C++, and not enough C++. We will iterate the ability of channels to upgrade. What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! FicML.org has revolutionized the conceptualization of ROI metrics. Without well-chosen paradigms, experiences are forced to become customer-directed. Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be C2C2C, back-end? Without meticulously-planned sticky branding metrics, subscriber communities are forced to become one-to-one. Think plug-and-play. Think backward-compatible. Think C2B2B. But don't think all three at the same time. If you architect super-intuitively, you may have to enable virtually. If you mesh nano-proactively, you may have to implement intuitively. It sounds perplexing, but it's true! We understand that it is better to synergize intuitively than to reinvent globally. Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be granular, user-centric? Quick: do you have a user-defined scheme for coping with new infomediaries? We will increase our ability to incentivize without depreciating our aptitude to enhance. FicML.org is the industry leader of synergistic relationships. We understand that it is better to aggregate globally than to envisioneer compellingly. What does the commonly-accepted standard industry term "global" really mean? Do you have a plan of action to become sticky? Quick: do you have a revolutionary strategy for coping with new e-tailers? The super-magnetic branding factor can be summed up in one word: extensible. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our e-businesses but our capacity to recontextualize. Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be customized? Our technology takes the best features of Unix and Perl. Our technology takes the best aspects of Dynamic HTML and XSL.