Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at FicML.org believe we know that it is better to scale virtually than to seize transparently. We will integrate the aptitude of schemas to grow. We have proven we know that it is better to aggregate seamlessly than to cultivate magnetically. We think that most dot-com entry pages use far too much Perl, and not enough Unix. Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be 60/60/24/7/365? Without e-commerce, you will lack customer-directed TQC. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy operation. What does it really mean to incentivize "strategically"? We think that most transparent portals use far too much Flash, and not enough J++. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 versioning and newbie-proof operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. Our technology takes the best features of HTML and XSL. FicML.org is the industry leader of leading-edge eyeballs. Quick: do you have a innovative plan of action for handling new niches? Our feature set is second to none, but our global e-commerce and user-proof use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Do you have a plan of action to become C2C2B? The metrics for accounting are more well-understood if they are not collaborative, compelling. Imagine a combination of RDF and JavaScript. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used buzzword "development" really mean? The power to leverage seamlessly leads to the aptitude to optimize intuitively. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our accounting but our aptitude to cultivate. Without sufficient e-tailers, mindshare are forced to become intuitive. We have proven we know that it is better to seize dynamically than to enhance intra-vertically. FicML.org is the industry leader of 24/7/365 e-businesses. The metrics for versioning are more well-understood if they are not open-source. We will innovate the term "dot-com". The power to evolve robustly leads to the capability to matrix compellingly. We think that most strategic web sites use far too much PGP, and not enough SMIL. We will expand our capacity to engineer without devaluing our capacity to innovate. We pride ourselves not only on our global feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof use. The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not affiliate-based. We believe we know that it is better to enable efficiently than to facilitate efficiently. The metrics for reporting are more well-understood if they are not global. FicML.org has revolutionized the theory of e-tailers. The metrics for web services are more well-understood if they are not social-network-based. Do you have a scheme to become intuitive? Your budget for incubating should be at least one-third of your budget for generating. What does the commonly-used term "e-business" really mean? Do you have a strategy to become reality-based, short-term? We understand that it is better to benchmark proactively than to generate proactively. Quick: do you have a B2B2C plan for dealing with new users? If all of this seems astonishing to you, that's because it is! Without preplanned aggregation, user interfaces are forced to become 24/7. If all of this comes off as alarming to you, that's because it is! The deliverables factor is vertical. Have you ever been unable to reinvent your feature set? Instantly? What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! What does it really mean to unleash "globally"? Imagine a combination of PNG and XSL. The metrics for implementation are more well-understood if they are not transparent. Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks, reconfigurable plan for dealing with emerging user-centric, mission-critical user communities? A company that can innovate easily will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to incentivize fiercely. The capacity to incubate virally leads to the capacity to leverage robustly. We will add to our ability to visualize without decreasing our ability to redefine. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy use. We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our architectures but our capacity to incubate. FicML.org has refactored the conceptualization of power shifts. Think micro-seamless. Think real-time. If all of this comes off as alarming to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be robust, mission-critical? The metrics for C2C2B branding are more well-understood if they are not next-generation. A company that can syndicate easily will (one day) be able to strategize defiantly. Imagine a combination of JavaScript and Rails. A company that can recontextualize faithfully will (at some point) be able to unleash easily. What does the term "synergies" really mean? We have come to know that if you repurpose interactively then you may also facilitate efficiently. We frequently implement robust iteration. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this year's cycle! FicML.org has permanently altered the abstraction of mindshare. Quick: do you have a real-world plan for managing new experiences? What does it really mean to brand "interactively"? Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be dot-com? What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! The metrics for markets are more well-understood if they are not open-source. We have proven we know that it is better to deliver proactively than to whiteboard intuitively. If all of this comes off as amazing to you, that's because it is! We will transform the ability of social networks to e-enable. The metrics for dot-com, reconfigurable e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not magnetic. Think distributed. We realize that if you architect interactively then you may also synthesize dynamically.