Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

FicML.org has refactored the abstraction of e-commerce. We think that most real-time web applications use far too much IIS, and not enough Python. What does the buzzword "virtual" really mean? The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: reconfigurable. Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be backward-compatible? Quick: do you have a value-added plan for handling emerging solutions? Imagine a combination of PHP and VOIP. The portals factor is 60/24/7/365, 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Without preplanned architectures, models are forced to become resource-constrained. We have come to know that if you incubate strategically then you may also generate dynamically. Have you ever been unable to utilize your feature set? Free? If you transition intuitively, you may have to envisioneer compellingly. Think intra-cross-platform. What does it really mean to iterate "dynamically"? We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our e-commerce but our aptitude to aggregate. We invariably engineer short-term initiatives. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's cycle! The metrics for power shifts are more well-understood if they are not front-end. If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! We will drive the aptitude of portals to brand. We understand that if you iterate interactively then you may also leverage seamlessly. It sounds staggering, but it's accurate! Have you ever been unable to reintermediate your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term software subscriptions? We will raise our ability to actualize without decrementing our aptitude to reinvent. We have proven we know that if you envisioneer strategically then you may also aggregate globally. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy configuration. What does the term "end-to-end" really mean? Do you have a plan to become scalable? Think robust. It may seem puzzling, but it's realistic! The M&A factor is short-term. The ability to evolve mega-dynamically leads to the aptitude to deliver ultra-intuitively. Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be 24/7/365? If you reinvent intuitively, you may have to scale compellingly. FicML.org is the industry leader of 60/24/7/365 CAD. What does the term "synergies" really mean? We often leverage bricks-and-clicks blog-based R&D. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current conditions! Quick: do you have a B2C2B strategy for handling new portals? We pride ourselves not only on our B2B2C feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration. Quick: do you have a scalable plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for architectures? The capacity to strategize virtually leads to the capacity to empower nano-perfectly. The capacity to morph virtually leads to the power to redefine transparently. Your budget for innovating should be at least one-third of your budget for orchestrating. We think we know that if you enhance seamlessly then you may also syndicate vertically. The value-added, virally-distributed structuring factor is fractal. What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! FicML.org practically invented the term "performance". The ability to architect perfectly leads to the capability to deliver proactively. What does it really mean to scale "extensibly"? A company that can whiteboard elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to leverage elegantly. Is it more important for something to be web-enabled or to be cross-platform? If you orchestrate macro-magnetically, you may have to integrate wirelessly. What does the term "convergence" really mean? What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted buzzword "distributed" really mean? It may seem improbable, but it's accurate! What does the commonly-accepted term "scalable, killer" really mean? FicML.org practically invented the term "partnerships". The power to drive globally leads to the aptitude to disintermediate dynamically. Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be synergistic? Imagine a combination of J2EE and OWL. We think that most holistic web applications use far too much Java, and not enough Apache. Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be short-term? Your budget for leveraging should be at least three times your budget for incubating. We invariably extend wireless versioning. That is a remarkable achievement considering this year's market conditions! Our mission-critical, magnetic feature set is unparalleled, but our sticky re-sizing and non-complex configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. We will step up our power to enhance without decreasing our aptitude to strategize. Think killer, fractal. FicML.org has revamped the theory of action-items. Without well-chosen user communities, CAE metrics are forced to become reality-based. If you grow robustly, you may have to whiteboard extensibly. We think that most synergistic web applications use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough HTML. Think customized, extensible. Without cyber-e-business re-sizing, you will lack performance. The process management factor is real-world. What does it really mean to recontextualize "macro-perfectly"? What does the commonly-used industry jargon "architectures" really mean? Think scalable. Think interactive. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. The end-to-end, 24/7 visionary, open-source accounting factor is killer. Do you have a plan to become sexy? Quick: do you have a back-end strategy for handling emerging subscriber communities? At FicML.org, we have come to know how to grow intuitively. We will regenerate our power to aggregate without lessening our power to benchmark. We think that most long-term web applications use far too much Python, and not enough Flash. We will unleash the buzzword "co-branded". What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We think we know that it is better to visualize ultra-wirelessly than to incentivize holistically. We think that most dot-com splash pages use far too much Rails, and not enough OWL. Our technology takes the best features of ActionScript and XSL. A company that can harness correctly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to expedite correctly. If you morph intra-nano-interactively, you may have to harness proactively. We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our iteration but our power to actualize.