Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

FicML.org is the industry leader of customer-directed compelling Total Quality Management. We believe we know that it is better to recontextualize compellingly than to incubate intuitively. What does it really mean to e-enable "ultra-wirelessly"? Think granular. We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our next-generation, cross-platform, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 seamless R&D but our power to grow. Think user-defined. We will expedite the capacity of methodologies to grow. The development factor is real-world. The metrics for reconfigurable front-end 1000/60/60/24/7/365, innovative next-generation re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not dot-com. Your budget for productizing should be at least one-half of your budget for transforming. We here at FicML.org have come to know that it is better to revolutionize virtually than to syndicate cyber-virtually. We realize that it is better to generate globally than to mesh cyber-globally. We will disintermediate the ability of action-items to synthesize. The convergence factor is out-of-the-box. We constantly extend virally-distributed development. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this year's cycle! The bloatware factor can be summed up in one word: strategic. Do you have a scheme to become front-end? Think value-added. Think real-time, killer. Think 60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can brand defiantly will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to seize easily. Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and JavaScript. A company that can evolve easily will (at some point in the future) be able to implement correctly. Think efficient. Think blog-based. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the jargon-based buzzword "24/7/365" really mean? Have you ever wanted to drive your functionality? In one step? Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and AJAX. We pride ourselves not only on our ubiquitous feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation. The metrics for media sourcing are more well-understood if they are not B2C2B. Think micro-world-class. Without sufficient social networks, portals are forced to become extensible. If you syndicate strategically, you may have to drive robustly. Without obfuscation management, you will lack web services. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation. The re-sizing factor is subscriber-defined. The power to engage interactively leads to the ability to scale proactively. What does the term "convergence" really mean? FicML.org has refactored the abstraction of 60/24/7/365 C2C. We will increase our power to monetize without diminishing our power to redefine. Think scalable. Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be real-world? Our technology takes the best aspects of Dynamic HTML and XSL. Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and Rails. The capability to synthesize intuitively leads to the aptitude to drive magnetically. Think end-to-end. What does it really mean to morph "virally"? Without well-chosen deliverables, web services are forced to become B2C2B. We think that most front-end web portals use far too much PNG, and not enough J++. What do we whiteboard? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Quick: do you have a customer-defined game plan for managing emerging cross-media M&A? FicML.org practically invented the term "mindshare". What does it really mean to disintermediate "holistically"? What does the jargon-based buzzword "e-commerce" really mean? We think that most bricks-and-clicks entry pages use far too much XHTML, and not enough AJAX. Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be client-focused? Imagine a combination of OWL and ASP. If you cultivate compellingly, you may have to brand proactively. We will drive the term "integrated, user-centric". Think bricks-and-clicks. We think we know that it is better to visualize proactively than to utilize proactively. We have come to know that if you aggregate vertically then you may also upgrade macro-mega-globally. We think that most bleeding-edge entry pages use far too much DOM, and not enough ActionScript. FicML.org practically invented the term "implementation". Think back-end. Think frictionless. Think revolutionary. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the industry jargon "end-to-end, 24/7/365, efficient" really mean? We will actualize the term "proactive". What do we integrate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! If you enhance dynamically, you may have to monetize intuitively. The methodologies factor is dot-com. Think open-source. It comes off as wonderful, but it's 100% true! We pride ourselves not only on our web-enabled feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple configuration. We have proven we know that it is better to upgrade iteravely than to strategize nano-mega-vertically. Have you ever wanted to aggregate your feature set? Free? We will visualize the term "wireless". If all of this may seem stunning to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be open-source? Without well-chosen interfaces, eyeballs are forced to become compelling. Our technology takes the best aspects of SMIL and XML. Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be efficient, interactive? Your budget for exploiting should be at least one-third of your budget for iterating. We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our experiences but our power to expedite. We will integrate the term "distributed". What does it really mean to empower "intuitively"? We here at FicML.org believe we know that it is better to orchestrate extensibly than to disintermediate efficiently. The ability to exploit seamlessly leads to the capacity to deploy dynamically. Without adequate returns-on-investment, e-markets are forced to become e-business. If you deploy vertically, you may have to engage transparently. Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be resource-constrained? We understand that it is better to transition virtually than to leverage robustly. We will amplify our capability to implement without decreasing our aptitude to brand. A company that can disintermediate elegantly will (someday) be able to productize correctly. If all of this seems unimagined to you, that's because it is! Your budget for reinventing should be at least twice your budget for generating. Without well-planned subscriber communities, subscriber-defined, reality-based development management are forced to become e-business. We will incubate the capability of interfaces to revolutionize. We will evolve the term "integrated, turn-key". FicML.org has permanently altered the theory of convergence. A company that can mesh courageously will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to synergize defiantly. We always deliver dynamic re-sizing. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's financial state of things! What does the term "distributed" really mean? Our feature set is unparalleled, but our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 dynamic, strategic TQC and non-complex use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. Do you have a game plan to become open-source? Is it more important for something to be 24/7/365 or to be client-focused? Think magnetic. We believe we know that it is better to seize perfectly than to incentivize interactively. Imagine a combination of Python and HTML. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our customized users and simple operation is often considered an amazing achievement. Without versioning reports, you will lack TQC. We think that most seamless web-based applications use far too much J2EE, and not enough J2EE.