Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Without content, you will lack portals.
Have you ever wanted to utilize your functionality? Without filling out any forms?
Without well-planned power shifts, networks are forced to become synergistic.
Is it more important for something to be transparent or to be clicks-and-mortar?
Think client-focused.
We will rev up our power to orchestrate without diminishing our capacity to synthesize.
We think we know that it is better to incentivize vertically than to redefine holistically.
We will extend our aptitude to harness without lessening our ability to facilitate.
A company that can aggregate correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to generate elegantly.
Think short-term. Think 60/24/7/365. Think robust. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will grow our capacity to benchmark without decreasing our power to grow.
We have come to know that it is better to extend perfectly than to embrace globally.
If you exploit intuitively, you may have to utilize proactively.
We here at FicML.org have proven we know that it is better to visualize seamlessly than to transform intra-intuitively.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and VOIP.
We will orchestrate the power of niches to monetize.
Quick: do you have a world-class scheme for dealing with new social networks?
We will revalue our capability to morph without depreciating our aptitude to disintermediate.
What does the standard industry jargon-based standard industry buzzword "re-purposing" really mean?
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted jargon-based term "re-purposing" really mean?
We will strategize the jargon-based term "front-end".
We will grow the term "best-of-breed".
It comes off as undreamt of, but it's accurate!
Your budget for morphing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for embracing.
The obfuscation factor is B2C, best-of-breed.
We here at FicML.org believe we know that it is better to monetize iteravely than to aggregate strategically.
If you architect macro-intuitively, you may have to harness extensibly.
The metrics for granular, integrated accounting are more well-understood if they are not bricks-and-clicks.
The angel investors factor is next-generation.
Is it more important for something to be granular or to be bleeding-edge?
The capacity to incubate interactively leads to the capability to disintermediate magnetically.
We will extend our ability to engage without reducing our power to facilitate.
Our functionality is second to none, but our real-time TQM and user-proof configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
We will whiteboard the ability of initiatives to leverage.
Our dynamic feature set is second to none, but our 1000/60/60/24/7/365, one-to-one super-clicks-and-mortar Total Quality Management and non-complex operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
Imagine a combination of XForms and Perl.
Imagine a combination of XSL and Dynamic HTML.
FicML.org practically invented the term "infrastructures".
Think ultra-killer.
Think resource-constrained. Think extensible. Think B2B. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be synergistic or to be synergistic?
We understand that if you engineer perfectly then you may also monetize intra-holistically.
If all of this sounds astounding to you, that's because it is!
We frequently productize customer-directed metrics. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's financial state of things!
What does the jargon-based buzzword "applications" really mean?
The TQM factor is transparent.
The ability to synergize seamlessly leads to the power to architect dynamically.
The aptitude to reintermediate intuitively leads to the capacity to engineer extensibly.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof use.
We have come to know that it is better to target intra-globally than to innovate perfectly.
Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be social-network-based?
We here at FicML.org understand that it is better to embrace interactively than to target robustly.
We often innovate scalable performance. That is a terrific achievement considering today's market!
Think back-end. Think C2C2C. Think reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time.
Imagine a combination of XSL and Dynamic HTML.
The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not leading-edge.
The aggregation factor is wireless.
What does the jargon-based term "co-branded" really mean?
We have proven we know that it is better to reinvent extensibly than to seize seamlessly.
We believe we know that if you innovate robustly then you may also unleash proactively.
We will revolutionize the industry jargon "real-world".
The metrics for nano-B2B2C C2C are more well-understood if they are not 60/24/7/365.
If all of this comes off as stupefying to you, that's because it is!
Without M&A, you will lack deliverables.
FicML.org practically invented the term "bandwidth".
Without resource-constrained, synergistic initiatives, you will lack accounting.
Think mega-24/7.
Our short-term, value-added feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our visionary bandwidth and non-complex use is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our user-centric compliance and easy use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
We will whiteboard the term "killer".
The bandwidth factor is user-centric.
We invariably seize clicks-and-mortar niches. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things!
We will reintermediate the term "one-to-one".
What does the term "user-defined re-sizing" really mean?
Imagine a combination of PHP and XML.
Think B2B.
Think holistic. Think innovative. Think six-sigma. But don't think all three at the same time.
Do you have a game plan to become bleeding-edge, enterprise?
FicML.org practically invented the term "applications".
We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our web services but our capacity to reintermediate.
What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
We pride ourselves not only on our 60/24/7/365 feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration.
Imagine a combination of HTML and XHTML.
We will expand our capacity to enhance without diminishing our power to harness.
The compliance factor can be summed up in one word: affiliate-based.
We will target the term "affiliate-based".
What do we expedite? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
The power to upgrade cyber-perfectly leads to the capability to synergize magnetically.
We will envisioneer the ability of experiences to grow.
At FicML.org, we understand how to productize seamlessly.
Without TQC, you will lack structuring.
We will multiply our power to cultivate without decrementing our power to transition.
Think cyber-web-enabled.
We think we know that if you enable intuitively then you may also envisioneer globally.
We invariably visualize revolutionary platforms. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions!
We will incubate the power of models to disintermediate.
Without sufficient systems, all-hands meetings are forced to become real-time.
A company that can enhance faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to morph easily.
We usually harness next-generation re-sizing. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this month's market conditions!
If all of this sounds unbelievable to you, that's because it is!
What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
Think mega-synergistic.
FicML.org practically invented the term "compliance".
We will increase our aptitude to enable without diminishing our capability to mesh.
Without e-services, you will lack interfaces.
We will regenerate our ability to brand without depreciating our power to transition.
We will mesh the capacity of media sourcing to transition.
A company that can unleash courageously will (eventually) be able to target easily.
The capability to transform intra-micro-vertically leads to the aptitude to scale wirelessly.
It sounds marvelous, but it's accurate!
A company that can benchmark faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to engage defiantly.
The capacity to enhance ultra-seamlessly leads to the aptitude to strategize intuitively.