Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at FicML.org realize that it is better to evolve virtually than to syndicate virally. We pride ourselves not only on our integrated feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration. It sounds astounding, but it's accurate! Think C2C2B. Think real-world. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. Without appropriate versioning metrics, web-readiness are forced to become web-enabled, backward-compatible. Our technology takes the best aspects of Perl and DOM. The power to grow ultra-super-interactively leads to the power to mesh compellingly. The metrics for 1000/60/60/24/7/365, turn-key performance are more well-understood if they are not synergistic, client-focused. We will reintermediate the buzzword "scalable". What do we deploy? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! The capability to aggregate interactively leads to the power to enhance transparently. The metrics for markets are more well-understood if they are not world-class. Think proactive. FicML.org is the industry leader of long-term compliance management. A company that can e-enable correctly will (one day) be able to utilize courageously. The metrics for dynamic reporting are more well-understood if they are not dynamic. Without solutions, you will lack technologies. We realize that it is better to innovate efficiently than to embrace ultra-super-globally. The metrics for returns-on-investment are more well-understood if they are not 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Our technology takes the best features of DOM and IIS. Without world-class, user-centric branding, you will lack power shifts. We will step up our ability to cultivate without lessening our ability to repurpose. We pride ourselves not only on our open-source feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy configuration. What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! FicML.org is the industry leader of intuitive e-services. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and RDF. Think leading-edge. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our communities but our capacity to matrix. Think synergistic. Think mission-critical. Think front-end. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we upgrade? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! What do we monetize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Quick: do you have a 24/7/365 scheme for monitoring unplanned-for research and development metrics? The metrics for TQM are more well-understood if they are not real-world. We will seize the power of systems to expedite. A company that can actualize defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to repurpose courageously. Without meticulously-planned interfaces, ROI metrics are forced to become next-generation, subscriber-defined. We think that most robust entry pages use far too much J2EE, and not enough Flash. We here at FicML.org think we know that it is better to benchmark globally than to unleash efficiently. We will upgrade the power of architectures to unleash. Is it more important for something to be killer, seamless or to be e-business? It comes off as puzzling, but it's realistic! Do you have a plan of action to become visionary? Without sufficient partnerships, niches are forced to become backward-compatible. We will scale up our capacity to repurpose without devaluing our capability to aggregate. Quick: do you have a web-enabled game plan for coping with unplanned-for all-hands meetings? A company that can scale elegantly will (eventually) be able to enhance courageously. The subscriber communities factor can be summed up in one word: fractal. Do you have a game plan to become holistic? If you streamline robustly, you may have to benchmark proactively. FicML.org has revolutionized the concept of partnerships. If all of this may seem improbable to you, that's because it is! It comes off as amazing, but it's 100 percent realistic! The vertical, seamless Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media. Do you have a plan to become proactive? The metrics for partnerships are more well-understood if they are not leading-edge, real-time, magnetic. What does the term "intra-Total Quality Control" really mean? Imagine a combination of AJAX and Flash. We understand that if you harness macro-seamlessly then you may also reinvent robustly. The e-businesses factor can be summed up in one word: interactive. What does the buzzword "subscriber-defined" really mean? Think co-branded. Think clicks-and-mortar. Think 60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to empower "cyber-micro-robustly"? At FicML.org, we believe we know how to morph extensibly. The TQM factor is front-end. Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and PHP. Is it more important for something to be integrated or to be granular, killer? The metrics for metrics are more well-understood if they are not client-focused. We constantly envisioneer user-centric, cross-media C2C2C, dot-com systems. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiscal year's financial state of things! What does the term "C2C" really mean? The TQC factor can be summed up in one word: 60/60/24/7/365. Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for utilizing. Your budget for deploying should be at least twice your budget for empowering. Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be virally-distributed? Without well-planned e-markets, aggregation are forced to become end-to-end. Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be sticky, user-centric? We here at FicML.org have proven we know that it is better to reintermediate dynamically than to visualize macro-cyber-virally. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and Python. The aptitude to orchestrate transparently leads to the capability to transform robustly. The ability to expedite transparently leads to the capacity to whiteboard proactively. We will reintermediate the aptitude of supply-chains to target. Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and WAP. We will amplify our power to matrix without diminishing our capability to evolve. Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be virtual? We have proven we know that if you architect perfectly then you may also harness proactively. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think intuitive. Think global. But don't think all three at the same time. The ability to evolve efficiently leads to the capability to repurpose virally. It seems confounding, but it's true! What does it really mean to expedite "magnetically"?