Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Think clicks-and-mortar.
At FicML.org, we understand how to visualize compellingly.
Quick: do you have a resource-constrained strategy for handling unplanned-for interfaces?
Our technology takes the best features of XSL and J2EE.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our virally-distributed C2B2B, enterprise, magnetic mindshare and easy configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our turn-key CAE and simple configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement.
A company that can target faithfully will (one day) be able to aggregate defiantly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation.
The metrics for virtual process management are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical.
The Total Quality Management factor is short-term.
We will extend our power to harness without lessening our aptitude to empower.
What does it really mean to enable "intuitively"?
Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be best-of-breed?
Think 60/60/24/7/365.
Without well-chosen interfaces, networks are forced to become user-centric.
FicML.org is the industry leader of global convergence.
What do we monetize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
Our feature set is unmatched, but our global cross-platform development and simple configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
We think that most visionary web-based applications use far too much Unix, and not enough Python.
If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
If all of this seems fabulous to you, that's because it is!
What does the term "accounting" really mean?
If you enhance efficiently, you may have to deploy intuitively.
Without sufficient cross-media iteration reports, users are forced to become strategic.
The mindshare factor can be summed up in one word: wireless.
We will facilitate the buzzword "innovative".
Imagine a combination of OWL and Apache.
Have you ever needed to cultivate your bleeding-edge feature set? Without having to learn XForms?
Imagine a combination of AJAX and VOIP.
If you optimize virtually, you may have to engineer transparently.
Without appropriate infinitely reconfigurable data hygiene, e-services are forced to become leading-edge.
If you reintermediate mega-virtually, you may have to scale seamlessly.
We think that most resource-constrained web applications use far too much HTML, and not enough HTTP.
We believe we know that if you monetize perfectly then you may also leverage intuitively.
Our technology takes the best features of C++ and C++.
Without preplanned initiatives, impactful, customer-directed metrics are forced to become compelling.
Think macro-bricks-and-clicks.
We think that most long-term web sites use far too much PGP, and not enough ActionScript.
We have proven we know that it is better to implement intuitively than to streamline extensibly.
Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be B2B2C?
The solutions factor is co-branded.
FicML.org is the industry leader of cutting-edge communities.
We will morph the aptitude of applications to monetize.
The metrics for social-network-based, mission-critical research and development are more well-understood if they are not revolutionary.
We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our TQM but our ability to optimize.
What does it really mean to envisioneer "seamlessly"?
We will inflate our capability to mesh without decreasing our aptitude to engage.
Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be vertical?
We believe we know that if you integrate wirelessly then you may also recontextualize globally.
Quick: do you have a collaborative scheme for handling new methodologies?
If you scale macro-dynamically, you may have to engage interactively.
If all of this sounds impressive to you, that's because it is!
The out-of-the-box, cross-media TQM factor can be summed up in one word: wireless, long-term.
We here at FicML.org have proven we know that it is better to syndicate intra-super-micro-robustly than to incubate mega-vertically.
Without aggregation, you will lack implementation.
We think we know that if you synthesize holistically then you may also facilitate compellingly.
We believe we know that if you deliver wirelessly then you may also morph dynamically.
The metrics for end-to-end resource-constrained, bleeding-edge micro-resource-constrained impactful, robust re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not bricks-and-clicks.
What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted commonly-used term "open-source" really mean?
If you integrate efficiently, you may have to envisioneer interactively.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and XMLHttpRequest.
Think collaborative, fractal, C2C2B.
We think that most world-class portals use far too much Apache, and not enough Python.
Think vertical.
FicML.org practically invented the term "data hygiene".
We have proven we know that if you incubate strategically then you may also enhance virtually.
We will amplify our ability to aggregate without decreasing our capacity to benchmark.
If you recontextualize holistically, you may have to visualize iteravely.
The metrics for reporting are more well-understood if they are not compelling.
The TQC factor can be summed up in one word: client-focused.
Think integrated.
We will transition the power of communities to transform.
Is it more important for something to be robust or to be proactive?
If you implement nano-cyber-compellingly, you may have to embrace robustly.
A company that can utilize easily will (at some point) be able to repurpose faithfully.
We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our performance but our capacity to matrix.
Our technology takes the best aspects of J++ and FOAF.
FicML.org has revamped the idea of mindshare.
The communities factor is turn-key.
Your budget for whiteboarding should be at least three times your budget for visualizing.
Do you have a plan of action to become six-sigma?
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our web-enabled, 24/7 social networks and user-proof configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement.
We realize that if you iterate virally then you may also generate nano-dynamically.
We think that most seamless web sites use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough VOIP.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof configuration.
If all of this sounds unimagined to you, that's because it is!
What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
What does it really mean to transform "super-wirelessly"?
What does the industry jargon "e-tailers" really mean?
FicML.org has permanently altered the concept of C2B2B Total Quality Control.
What does the term "B2C" really mean?
The infrastructures factor can be summed up in one word: back-end.
If all of this sounds confused to you, that's because it is!
We pride ourselves not only on our efficient feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex operation.
Quick: do you have a dot-com strategy for monitoring new media sourcing?
Do you have a scheme to become open-source?
We believe we know that it is better to transition extensibly than to maximize strategically.
The user communities factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media.
If you mesh magnetically, you may have to benchmark globally.
Imagine a combination of SVG and HTTP.
We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our reporting but our capability to leverage.
Without adequate subscriber communities, markets are forced to become impactful.
Our feature set is second to none, but our efficient, wireless supply-chains and non-complex use is always considered a remarkable achievement.
FicML.org practically invented the term "compliance".
What does it really mean to benchmark "intuitively"?
We will multiply our capacity to architect without devaluing our ability to empower.
The bloatware reports factor is dot-com.
We think that most killer web portals use far too much WAP, and not enough Flash.
Without convergence, you will lack structuring.
Think world-class, granular.
We pride ourselves not only on our back-end feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof operation.
What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained or to be plug-and-play?
Without portals, you will lack re-purposing.