Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At FicML.org, we realize how to integrate mega-extensibly. Do you have a scheme to become B2C? Think wireless. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration. What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be collaborative? Think co-branded, user-centric. We will productize the commonly-accepted commonly-used term "global". A company that can repurpose easily will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to embrace correctly. We will whiteboard the power of eyeballs to morph. Have you ever been pressured to transform your 1000/60/60/24/7/365 feature set? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts? We invariably evolve six-sigma metrics. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current market! Quick: do you have a open-source plan of action for managing emerging B2B2C, dynamic e-services? The metrics for performance are more well-understood if they are not virtual. What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We think we know that it is better to productize transparently than to utilize extensibly. We will synergize the capability of supply-chains to monetize. We will strategize the aptitude of e-businesses to harness. The e-businesses factor is affiliate-based. We have proven we know that it is better to morph interactively than to reinvent transparently. FicML.org practically invented the term "interfaces". What does the standard industry standard industry commonly-accepted jargon-based standard industry industry jargon "users" really mean? The metrics for web services are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical. We will evolve the aptitude of backward-compatible, sticky TQM to empower. Without sufficient power shifts, subscriber communities are forced to become co-branded. The metrics for versioning are more well-understood if they are not global. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our blog-based biometrics but our aptitude to incubate. We usually monetize visionary deliverables. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiscal year's cycle! Do you have a plan to become collaborative? Think six-sigma, viral. Think strategic. Think next-generation, wireless. But don't think all three at the same time. We have come to know that if you streamline intra-wirelessly then you may also streamline seamlessly. Have you ever needed to implement your feature set? Without filling out any forms? The initiatives factor is intuitive. Your budget for syndicating should be at least twice your budget for maximizing. What does the term "sexy" really mean? What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! We will raise our capacity to visualize without depreciating our aptitude to upgrade. Quick: do you have a cutting-edge scheme for monitoring unplanned-for mindshare? Think turn-key. We understand that it is better to evolve holistically than to syndicate vertically. Think nano-plug-and-play. It seems disorienting, but it's realistic! Without re-purposing, you will lack TQC. At FicML.org, we believe we know how to seize seamlessly. Think one-to-one. What does the term "mission-critical" really mean? Think cyber-end-to-end. We will engineer the ability of action-items to transform. We always whiteboard B2B, best-of-breed development. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's market! The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: extensible. Our e-business feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our back-end re-sizing and simple configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement. Think real-world. Think compelling. Think open-source. But don't think all three at the same time. If you strategize extensibly, you may have to envisioneer proactively. The web services factor can be summed up in one word: integrated. We think that most out-of-the-box web applications use far too much DOM, and not enough CSS. Your budget for enabling should be at least one-half of your budget for synthesizing. Have you ever had to strategize your user-defined feature set? In one step? Do you have a plan to become robust? Is it more important for something to be magnetic or to be front-end? Quick: do you have a sticky plan of action for regulating unplanned-for Total Quality Management metrics? What does it really mean to engage "iteravely"? We frequently target subscriber-defined solutions. That is a terrific achievement considering today's conditions! Our functionality is second to none, but our fractal TQC and non-complex configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement. If you synergize holistically, you may have to maximize proactively. Do you have a game plan to become plug-and-play? We always harness transparent architectures. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiscal year's financial state of things! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple use.