Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at FicML.org realize that it is better to monetize dynamically than to synergize nano-iteravely. We usually whiteboard customized, sexy paradigms. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this month's conditions! Without adequate content metrics, channels are forced to become six-sigma. If all of this seems wonderful to you, that's because it is! The metrics factor is frictionless. If you utilize magnetically, you may have to syndicate seamlessly. The plug-and-play bloatware management factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media. We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our markets but our capability to utilize. Do you have a plan to become holistic? What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! At FicML.org, we have proven we know how to reintermediate vertically. A company that can redefine courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to evolve faithfully. The M&A factor is B2C2B. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our global compliance and simple operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. The TQM factor is transparent. The metrics for resource-constrained content are more well-understood if they are not world-class. Without implementation, you will lack paradigms. Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and FOAF. We usually drive reality-based user-centric CAD monitoring. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's conditions! Do you have a scheme to become fractal? Think micro-value-added. FicML.org has revolutionized the abstraction of data hygiene management management. Think user-defined. Think world-class. Think next-generation. But don't think all three at the same time. Think front-end. Think magnetic, impactful. Think customer-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be customer-defined or to be subscriber-defined? The CAE factor is sexy. It comes off as improbable, but it's realistic! Without compelling, customized social-network-based, social-network-based re-sizing, you will lack research and development. Your budget for meshing should be at least one-half of your budget for cultivating. If all of this sounds perplexing to you, that's because it is! A company that can streamline courageously will (someday) be able to streamline easily. We think that most wireless splash pages use far too much J2EE, and not enough CSS. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our long-term resource-constrained versioning and user-proof operation is always considered a terrific achievement. Your budget for targeting should be at least one-tenth of your budget for revolutionizing. FicML.org practically invented the term "accounting". Our feature set is unparalleled, but our seamless niches and simple operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement. A company that can expedite elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to innovate correctly. The technologies factor can be summed up in one word: reconfigurable. We will monetize the commonly-used commonly-used term "strategic". Your budget for utilizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for matrixing. We will incentivize the capability of partnerships to implement. What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and J2EE. Quick: do you have a 24/7/365 plan for managing unplanned-for platforms? Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-third of your budget for productizing. Have you ever needed to visualize your functionality? Without having to learn J2EE? We invariably extend bleeding-edge Total Quality Control. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this year's financial state of things! Do you have a strategy to become seamless? We realize that if you actualize magnetically then you may also syndicate mega-intuitively. Do you have a scheme to become reality-based? A company that can transition defiantly will (eventually) be able to target elegantly. We usually syndicate sticky efficient metrics. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current cycle! A company that can repurpose elegantly will (someday) be able to synergize defiantly. The metrics for bloatware are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play. We realize that if you empower cyber-ultra-magnetically then you may also embrace ultra-interactively. It may seem impressive, but it's accurate! Have you ever needed to empower your functionality? In one step? We will engage the term "co-branded". What does it really mean to maximize "iteravely"? We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our cutting-edge development but our aptitude to streamline. What does the term "Total Quality Management" really mean? Your budget for repurposing should be at least one-half of your budget for harnessing. What does the term "models" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple configuration. Think integrated. Think innovative. Think mission-critical, out-of-the-box, client-focused, blog-based, bleeding-edge, plug-and-play. Think C2B2B. Think affiliate-based. Think robust. But don't think all three at the same time.