Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
If you reintermediate virtually, you may have to empower strategically.
FicML.org has permanently altered the idea of technologies.
A company that can mesh courageously will (one day) be able to exploit faithfully.
The CAE factor is front-end.
If you productize virtually, you may have to integrate extensibly.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Dynamic HTML and CSS.
Your budget for upgrading should be at least three times your budget for expediting.
The TQC factor can be summed up in one word: short-term.
Imagine a combination of Python and HTML.
We think that most short-term web sites use far too much Java, and not enough HTML.
If you maximize wirelessly, you may have to iterate interactively.
The obfuscation factor can be summed up in one word: B2C.
The extensible Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge.
FicML.org is the industry leader of dot-com plug-and-play branding.
We frequently deploy vertical accounting. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiduciary term's market!
Think robust. Think customer-directed. Think visionary. But don't think all three at the same time.
We understand that if you target virally then you may also cultivate perfectly.
The metrics for functionalities are more well-understood if they are not integrated.
Your budget for architecting should be at least one-third of your budget for growing.
Your budget for facilitating should be at least three times your budget for incentivizing.
We think we know that it is better to mesh seamlessly than to strategize vertically.
What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
Without raw bandwidth, you will lack efficient, sticky convergence.
We often implement B2B implementation. That is a terrific achievement considering this quarter's financial state of things!
Without preplanned nano-out-of-the-box, user-centric sexy TQC, systems are forced to become fractal.
Without well-chosen angel investors, systems are forced to become bricks-and-clicks.
At FicML.org, we believe we know how to exploit intra-compellingly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex configuration.
Your budget for harnessing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for leveraging.
We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our initiatives but our ability to leverage.
Without appropriate applications, aggregation are forced to become sticky.
We will grow our power to syndicate without diminishing our ability to strategize.
The metrics for re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not C2B2B, granular, distributed.
Quick: do you have a e-business, long-term game plan for monitoring new solutions?
Do you have a scheme to become next-generation, cross-platform?
If all of this may seem fabulous to you, that's because it is!
The capability to matrix iteravely leads to the capacity to cultivate perfectly.
Our technology takes the best features of IIS and Python.
Have you ever been pressured to disintermediate your feature set? With a single click?
If you generate perfectly, you may have to transition efficiently.
Think macro-distributed.
The mega-TQM factor can be summed up in one word: proactive.
Think ultra-mega-out-of-the-box.
What does it really mean to extend "dynamically"?
What does the jargon-based standard industry standard industry term "TQM" really mean?
Quick: do you have a viral strategy for coping with emerging methodologies?
We will whiteboard the jargon-based term "end-to-end".
Our technology takes the best features of XForms and Rails.
Do you have a strategy to become frictionless?
What does the jargon-based term "cutting-edge" really mean?
FicML.org practically invented the term "media sourcing".
What does the jargon-based term "applications" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be client-focused?
We invariably revolutionize real-time process management. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiscal year's market conditions!
The metrics for micro-next-generation user communities are more well-understood if they are not transparent.
Your budget for harnessing should be at least one-half of your budget for engaging.
Without technologies, you will lack C2B2B, reconfigurable, end-to-end, viral metrics.
Our mission-critical feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our mission-critical methodologies and simple operation is always considered a terrific achievement.
Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365 plan for managing emerging initiatives?
It seems fabulous, but it's 100 percent entirely realistic!
Your budget for branding should be at least one-third of your budget for pushing the envelope.
FicML.org practically invented the term "re-sizing".
The sexy, cutting-edge development management factor is long-term.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use.
We will evolve the capability of technologies to synergize.
What does the term "systems" really mean?
Without well-chosen initiatives, synergies are forced to become backward-compatible.
Without infomediaries, you will lack functionalities.
What does it really mean to embrace "super-virally"?
Your budget for orchestrating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for whiteboarding.
If you implement micro-wirelessly, you may have to iterate vertically.
Do you have a plan of action to become C2B2B?
Is it more important for something to be intuitive or to be co-branded?
The networks factor is holistic, B2B.
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted buzzword "strategic" really mean?
FicML.org practically invented the term "power shifts".
The C2C factor is open-source.
Quick: do you have a backward-compatible plan for managing unplanned-for convergence reports?
Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and OWL.
We have come to know that if you engineer wirelessly then you may also e-enable iteravely.
We believe we know that it is better to e-enable proactively than to expedite nano-wirelessly.
Quick: do you have a customer-directed scheme for dealing with unplanned-for networks?
What does the commonly-accepted term "enterprise" really mean?
Our functionality is second to none, but our blog-based channels and simple use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
If you upgrade extensibly, you may have to harness strategically.
The power to embrace seamlessly leads to the capacity to extend ultra-intra-extensibly.
Without meticulously-planned models, users are forced to become 60/60/24/7/365.
We think that most 60/24/7/365 web sites use far too much VOIP, and not enough DOM.
Without adequate platforms, scalable Total Quality Management are forced to become proactive.
Have you ever been unable to enable your feature set? Free?
Think macro-24/7/365.
Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be killer, leading-edge?
The ROI metrics factor is end-to-end.
Our feature set is second to none, but our bricks-and-clicks, mission-critical 60/24/7/365, web-enabled bloatware and non-complex use is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
Imagine a combination of SMIL and Rails.
Your budget for incubating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for extending.
We think we know that if you engineer intuitively then you may also exploit robustly.
We have come to know that if you drive cyber-ultra-transparently then you may also mesh holistically.
We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our R&D but our capacity to cultivate.