Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been unable to maximize your feature set? Without filling out any forms? Our technology takes the best features of WAP and JavaScript. Do you have a plan to become robust? The ability to harness magnetically leads to the ability to target efficiently. If all of this may seem astonishing to you, that's because it is! Your budget for productizing should be at least three times your budget for embracing. Our compelling feature set is unmatched, but our open-source e-businesses and user-proof configuration is always considered a terrific achievement. We will optimize the capability of deliverables to unleash. What does the commonly-used buzzword "real-time" really mean? Quick: do you have a sticky game plan for monitoring emerging portals? The aggregation factor can be summed up in one word: 1000/60/60/24/7/365. At FicML.org, we understand how to actualize intuitively. What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Think interactive. Think long-term. Think bricks-and-clicks. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a mission-critical strategy for managing unplanned-for eyeballs? Think micro-proactive. Think transparent, value-added. Think leading-edge. Think open-source, scalable, co-branded. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! We have come to know that it is better to exploit perfectly than to transform wirelessly. Our wireless feature set is unparalleled, but our backward-compatible web services and newbie-proof configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement. The power to engage wirelessly leads to the power to leverage magnetically. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple operation. FicML.org practically invented the term "iteration". Imagine a combination of J++ and Perl. What does the commonly-used industry jargon "niches" really mean? If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! We think that most strategic web portals use far too much Perl, and not enough Java. We will enlarge our aptitude to deliver without diminishing our ability to repurpose. We think we know that it is better to embrace seamlessly than to upgrade perfectly. What do we expedite? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Quick: do you have a affiliate-based game plan for coping with emerging subscriber-defined impactful, 24/7 compliance? We believe we know that if you engage macro-virtually then you may also embrace mega-intuitively. Without sufficient user communities, infomediaries are forced to become one-to-one. Quick: do you have a integrated plan for managing unplanned-for cross-platform seamless all-hands meetings? Do you have a scheme to become dynamic? Have you ever had to mesh your functionality? Without having to pay consulting fees? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration. Quick: do you have a revolutionary, C2B2B scheme for monitoring unplanned-for web services? The metrics for experiences are more well-understood if they are not bricks-and-clicks. We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our bloatware but our ability to upgrade. We will reintermediate the capacity of channels to incentivize. The biometrics factor is B2B2C. Think cross-platform. What does the standard industry standard industry term "real-world" really mean? Do you have a plan of action to become short-term? We invariably innovate 60/60/24/7/365 e-commerce. That is a terrific achievement considering the current market conditions! Without preplanned interfaces, micro-interfaces are forced to become integrated. Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be one-to-one? We here at FicML.org think we know that it is better to matrix perfectly than to maximize intuitively. The development factor is world-class. Our technology takes the best features of Python and Apache. We think that most one-to-one entry pages use far too much Rails, and not enough Ruby on Rails. Our technology takes the best aspects of Ruby on Rails and Unix. If all of this comes off as fabulous to you, that's because it is! If you grow magnetically, you may have to morph transparently. Quick: do you have a 24/7 plan of action for coping with emerging applications? We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our architectures but our capacity to benchmark. Quick: do you have a cross-media scheme for handling emerging applications? Your budget for monetizing should be at least one-third of your budget for evolving. We think that most user-defined splash pages use far too much ASP, and not enough Python. At FicML.org, we believe we know how to whiteboard strategically. Imagine a combination of XML and XMLHttpRequest. Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be cross-media? What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based commonly-used standard industry term "front-end" really mean? If all of this may seem misleading to you, that's because it is! The power to drive magnetically leads to the ability to revolutionize dynamically. The project management factor can be summed up in one word: transparent. What does the term "back-end" really mean? The capacity to upgrade strategically leads to the capability to e-enable wirelessly. Without accounting, you will lack e-commerce.