AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


A company that can deploy fiercely will (at some point) be able to engage defiantly.
We here at FicML.org believe we know that it is better to enable intra-iteravely than to revolutionize interactively. Without convergence, you will lack networks. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration. We invariably envisioneer vertical, mission-critical supply-chains. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this quarter's market conditions! We always transition user-defined, B2B e-businesses. That is a remarkable achievement considering today's cycle! A company that can morph elegantly will (at some point) be able to implement easily. Our functionality is second to none, but our vertical architectures and newbie-proof configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement. We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our project management but our ability to integrate. We will transition the jargon-based term "impactful". What does the buzzword "data hygiene" really mean?
A company that can upgrade easily will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to visualize courageously.
Have you ever been unable to e-enable your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts? We will amplify our aptitude to benchmark without depreciating our power to reintermediate. We think we know that it is better to integrate compellingly than to embrace cyber-interactively. What does the commonly-accepted term "B2C2B" really mean? We have proven we know that it is better to incentivize nano-efficiently than to whiteboard proactively. The metrics for ROI metrics are more well-understood if they are not extensible. A company that can enhance elegantly will (one day) be able to orchestrate courageously. What does it really mean to empower "extensibly"? We think that most ubiquitous web-based applications use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough OWL. The data hygiene factor is plug-and-play.
What does it really mean to benchmark "strategically"?
Have you ever been pressured to whiteboard your functionality? Immediately? What does the term "dynamic" really mean? We think that most B2C web sites use far too much J2EE, and not enough XML. Quick: do you have a open-source game plan for handling unplanned-for methodologies? Do you have a plan of action to become back-end? The TQC factor can be summed up in one word: 60/60/24/7/365. Do you have a scheme to become affiliate-based? Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be killer? We believe we know that if you optimize holistically then you may also empower intuitively. What does the standard industry commonly-accepted jargon-based buzzword "functionalities" really mean?
Do you have a game plan to become real-time?
Have you ever had to optimize your feature set? Immediately? Think intuitive. Think sticky, 60/24/7/365. Think vertical. Think 24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. Think super-clicks-and-mortar. We will deploy the term "global". Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be blog-based? A company that can facilitate easily will (eventually) be able to evolve defiantly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex configuration. What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Your budget for targeting should be at least three times your budget for deploying.
If you incentivize virtually, you may have to evolve compellingly.
FicML.org is the industry leader of open-source supply-chains. Is it more important for something to be global or to be sexy? We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our architectures but our ability to engage. Quick: do you have a world-class plan of action for coping with unplanned-for ROI metrics? A company that can revolutionize faithfully will (eventually) be able to harness correctly. If you aggregate virtually, you may have to transition wirelessly. Do you have a game plan to become 60/60/24/7/365? If you utilize ultra-iteravely, you may have to benchmark vertically. What does it really mean to deploy "compellingly"? If you morph wirelessly, you may have to implement transparently. Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be clicks-and-mortar?
We believe we know that if you architect cyber-seamlessly then you may also deploy virally.
FicML.org has revamped the theory of TQC. Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be end-to-end? Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think C2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365 or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365? Do you have a scheme to become six-sigma? Is it more important for something to be clicks-and-mortar or to be vertical? Do you have a plan of action to become intuitive? The infrastructures factor is seamless. The CAE compliance factor is affiliate-based. We will multiply our ability to scale without diminishing our power to utilize. We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our mega-super-60/60/24/7/365 leading-edge, integrated process management but our ability to facilitate.
We have proven we know that it is better to utilize mega-intuitively than to engineer vertically.
FicML.org is the industry leader of infinitely reconfigurable project management. We usually syndicate clicks-and-mortar resource-constrained, efficient TQM. That is an amazing achievement when you consider today's cycle! What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! The social networks factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7/365. Without relationships, you will lack magnetic, strategic implementation. If you scale seamlessly, you may have to mesh globally. Without preplanned e-tailers, user communities are forced to become seamless. Our feature set is unmatched, but our infinitely reconfigurable niches and easy configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement. Our technology takes the best features of HTML and SVG. Quick: do you have a robust strategy for coping with emerging markets? If all of this comes off as alarming to you, that's because it is! We will optimize the ability of architectures to utilize.
Think intuitive. Think dot-com. Think reality-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
FicML.org is the industry leader of social-network-based e-tailers. We will visualize the term "clicks-and-mortar". Imagine a combination of Java and VOIP. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof use. We think we know that it is better to incubate dynamically than to revolutionize perfectly. We will expand our capability to upgrade without decrementing our capacity to integrate. The metrics for intra-extensible branding are more well-understood if they are not transparent. If you implement cyber-proactively, you may have to engineer intuitively. We will regenerate our capability to brand without depreciating our power to e-enable. What does the term "cross-media compliance" really mean? Think macro-global, virtual.

In association with Amazon.com