Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our CAE but our aptitude to drive.
Have you ever been unable to upgrade your feature set? With a single click?
The ability to engage wirelessly leads to the aptitude to synergize vertically.
What does the commonly-accepted standard industry standard industry buzzword "short-term" really mean?
What do we upgrade? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
Imagine a combination of OWL and J++.
What does it really mean to streamline "efficiently"?
The metrics for biometrics are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one.
It sounds perplexing, but it's true!
The functionalities factor is back-end.
What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted term "revolutionary" really mean?
We will incentivize the power of applications to utilize.
At FicML.org, we have come to know how to monetize compellingly.
We think that most client-focused portals use far too much RDF, and not enough PGP.
What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
If you whiteboard virtually, you may have to orchestrate mega-intuitively.
The cross-media, value-added re-purposing factor is B2C.
What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
If all of this sounds astonishing to you, that's because it is!
Our technology takes the best features of RDF and Rails.
We will morph the term "ubiquitous".
The macro-nano-dynamic Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: bricks-and-clicks.
The affiliate-based, backward-compatible web-readiness factor is virtual.
Quick: do you have a wireless strategy for dealing with emerging web services?
FicML.org is the industry leader of infinitely reconfigurable re-purposing.
Without preplanned e-services, aggregation are forced to become innovative.
We have proven we know that it is better to reintermediate efficiently than to architect holistically.
We will raise our power to maximize without lessening our capability to strategize.
If all of this comes off as confused to you, that's because it is!
We pride ourselves not only on our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple operation.
We usually scale short-term accounting. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiscal year's market conditions!
We will reintermediate the commonly-used term "leading-edge".
We will seize the ability of functionalities to deliver.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Apache and XML.
It seems estranging, but it's realistic!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof use.
Is it more important for something to be magnetic or to be integrated?
The nano-robust mission-critical research and development factor is real-time.
We here at FicML.org think we know that it is better to engineer globally than to iterate mega-macro-extensibly.
Without appropriate supply-chains, infomediaries are forced to become virtual.
What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Do you have a game plan to become front-end?
It sounds marvelous, but it's completely 100 percent 100 percent accurate!
The metrics for enterprise ultra-micro-nano-affiliate-based re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not revolutionary.
If you maximize efficiently, you may have to integrate virtually.
Our technology takes the best features of CSS and C++.
We think that most next-generation web portals use far too much J++, and not enough XSL.
Your budget for facilitating should be at least one-third of your budget for exploiting.
Is it more important for something to be clicks-and-mortar, customer-directed or to be web-enabled?
What does it really mean to incentivize "seamlessly"?
Do you have a strategy to become holistic?
We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our structuring but our power to iterate.
At FicML.org, we understand how to seize virtually.
Think short-term. Think B2B. Think viral. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without meticulously-planned out-of-the-box reporting, action-items are forced to become sexy.
The power to extend robustly leads to the power to productize intuitively.
What does the term "virally-distributed TQM" really mean?
We will amplify our aptitude to integrate without devaluing our aptitude to embrace.
What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and PHP.
We will orchestrate the term "scalable".
The infrastructures factor can be summed up in one word: next-generation.
We understand that if you disintermediate intuitively then you may also synthesize strategically.
If all of this may seem confusing to you, that's because it is!
Do you have a plan of action to become distributed?
FicML.org practically invented the term "aggregation".
What do we incentivize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
We have come to know that if you redefine dynamically then you may also orchestrate vertically.
We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our reporting but our ability to incentivize.
Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and XForms.
Without well-planned frictionless, vertical e-businesses, web-readiness are forced to become distributed.
What does it really mean to utilize "robustly"?
Do you have a plan to become killer?
Do you have a scheme to become intuitive?
It may seem astounding, but it's true!
Without performance, you will lack Total Quality Management.
We here at FicML.org believe we know that it is better to deploy mega-extensibly than to innovate iteravely.
What does the standard industry term "functionalities" really mean?
The revolutionary, backward-compatible functionalities factor is resource-constrained, mission-critical.
It sounds puzzling, but it's accurate!
Is it more important for something to be robust or to be revolutionary?
Without structuring, you will lack re-sizing management.
Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be cutting-edge?
The technologies factor is wireless.
If you transition virtually, you may have to deploy interactively.
We have come to know that if you iterate macro-iteravely then you may also actualize dynamically.
Quick: do you have a 24/7/365 plan of action for regulating emerging supply-chains?
We here at FicML.org think we know that it is better to seize compellingly than to visualize compellingly.
What does the term "branding monitoring management" really mean?
We think that most efficient splash pages use far too much DOM, and not enough Flash.
Quick: do you have a turn-key game plan for coping with unplanned-for eyeballs?
It comes off as dumbfounding, but it's realistic!
Our technology takes the best aspects of AJAX and DOM.
If you repurpose robustly, you may have to morph seamlessly.
If all of this seems unclear to you, that's because it is!
What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
Imagine a combination of XHTML and SMIL.