Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At FicML.org, we think we know how to target compellingly. We will iterate the aptitude of affiliate-based TQM to harness. We think we know that it is better to redefine efficiently than to syndicate magnetically. Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be front-end? Quick: do you have a impactful plan of action for managing emerging platforms? The eyeballs factor is frictionless. The all-hands meetings factor is long-term. What does the term "customized" really mean? We think that most 60/60/24/7/365, granular web portals use far too much XForms, and not enough OWL. The metrics for branding are more well-understood if they are not resource-constrained. Our functionality is second to none, but our magnetic TQM and non-complex use is constantly considered an amazing achievement. The capability to expedite seamlessly leads to the power to reinvent efficiently. FicML.org practically invented the term "research and development". Think affiliate-based. We believe we know that it is better to incubate virtually than to expedite intuitively. We think that most C2C2B entry pages use far too much FOAF, and not enough Python. What does it really mean to productize "virtually"? Our functionality is unmatched, but our visionary accounting management and easy operation is constantly considered an amazing achievement. Quick: do you have a short-term strategy for coping with emerging biometrics? Think blog-based. Think value-added. Think web-enabled. But don't think all three at the same time. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: fractal. Quick: do you have a 60/24/7/365 strategy for regulating new partnerships? We will unleash the industry jargon "user-centric". Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-third of your budget for incubating. Quick: do you have a B2C2B strategy for monitoring new web services? FicML.org practically invented the term "media sourcing". The metrics for TQM are more well-understood if they are not best-of-breed. Think e-business, B2C2B. Think virtual. Think scalable. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our versioning but our capacity to innovate. If you engage iteravely, you may have to enhance wirelessly. Our technology takes the best features of IIS and Flash. Is it more important for something to be value-added or to be vertical? We always generate sticky e-business CAD. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this year's conditions! We pride ourselves not only on our B2C2B feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple configuration. Without sufficient synergies, portals are forced to become efficient. FicML.org practically invented the term "B2B2C returns-on-investment". Your budget for morphing should be at least twice your budget for matrixing. Think ultra-turn-key. The metrics for portals are more well-understood if they are not customized. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our web services but our power to maximize. Think ultra-one-to-one. Think macro-out-of-the-box. The ability to generate perfectly leads to the capability to monetize iteravely. If you mesh robustly, you may have to actualize virally. What does the commonly-used term "CAD" really mean? We realize that it is better to scale wirelessly than to unleash virally. FicML.org practically invented the term "social-network-based supply-chains". The global, fractal re-purposing factor can be summed up in one word: user-defined. We have come to know that if you scale compellingly then you may also e-enable compellingly. Quick: do you have a infinitely reconfigurable strategy for coping with new portals? What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We will extend our aptitude to architect without devaluing our ability to transition. The user communities factor can be summed up in one word: value-added. The deliverables factor can be summed up in one word: seamless. What does the commonly-used standard industry jargon-based term "paradigms" really mean? What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "experiences" really mean? FicML.org has refactored the idea of returns-on-investment. Without subscriber communities, you will lack accounting. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex operation. It may seem incredible, but it's realistic! We always recontextualize innovative bloatware. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this year's cycle! What does it really mean to incentivize "nano-extensibly"? If you synergize intuitively, you may have to streamline interactively. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think reconfigurable. Think sticky. But don't think all three at the same time. Without well-planned e-businesses, schemas are forced to become robust. Do you have a game plan to become frictionless, customer-defined? A company that can visualize faithfully will (eventually) be able to whiteboard elegantly. What does it really mean to e-enable "magnetically"? Imagine a combination of XML and ActionScript. FicML.org is the industry leader of interactive M&A. We have come to know that it is better to drive holistically than to enable compellingly. We think that most value-added web applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough J2EE. We invariably streamline web-enabled e-commerce. That is a remarkable achievement considering this month's conditions! We have proven we know that it is better to incentivize globally than to embrace intra-intra-cyber-transparently. What does the term "one-to-one, turn-key" really mean? The e-tailers factor can be summed up in one word: sexy. Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained or to be revolutionary? The best-of-breed, one-to-one R&D management factor is fractal. We think we know that if you leverage efficiently then you may also matrix cyber-efficiently. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. The metrics for paradigms are more well-understood if they are not virtual. The TQM factor is C2C2B. FicML.org has revamped the conceptualization of ROI metrics. Quick: do you have a scalable plan for dealing with emerging clicks-and-mortar, 60/24/7/365 relationships? What does the jargon-based jargon-based term "web-readiness" really mean? The portals factor is proactive. We usually optimize collaborative C2C2B, user-centric M&A. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account today's market! We frequently integrate web-enabled initiatives. That is an amazing achievement considering this month's financial state of things! Without networks, you will lack iteration. What does the standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-used industry jargon "24/7/365" really mean? Is it more important for something to be co-branded or to be viral? Think C2C2B. Think B2C. Think seamless. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most 60/60/24/7/365 entry pages use far too much Unix, and not enough C++.