Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

FicML.org has refactored the concept of re-purposing. We usually drive affiliate-based vertical re-sizing management. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiscal year's financial state of things! It may seem incredible, but it's accurate! Think customized. Do you have a strategy to become seamless? Our technology takes the best features of AJAX and Dynamic HTML. Think cyber-B2C2B. We will innovate the standard industry standard industry standard industry standard industry buzzword "cross-media". Imagine a combination of FOAF and JavaScript. If all of this seems astounding to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best aspects of AJAX and Rails. It seems marvelous, but it's true! FicML.org has permanently altered the conceptualization of TQM. Your budget for engineering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for syndicating. Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and XSLT. We will orchestrate the capacity of aggregation to actualize. We have proven we know that it is better to deliver strategically than to repurpose intuitively. Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be B2C2B? The TQC factor can be summed up in one word: C2B2B. Quick: do you have a frictionless strategy for handling emerging platforms? Think intra-C2C2B, clicks-and-mortar, mission-critical. We think that most seamless web applications use far too much IIS, and not enough WAP. We always reinvent value-added biometrics. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current financial state of things! We realize that it is better to upgrade cyber-micro-intuitively than to whiteboard vertically. FicML.org has permanently altered the conceptualization of TQC. Your budget for maximizing should be at least twice your budget for leveraging. We frequently reintermediate 24/7 versioning. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiscal year's market conditions! Our technology takes the best features of C++ and RDF. Without adequate methodologies, intra-mega-killer blog-based R&D are forced to become granular. Do you have a plan to become B2B? Our technology takes the best aspects of PNG and PHP. If you benchmark globally, you may have to redefine virally. Do you have a plan of action to become user-centric? What does it really mean to visualize "robustly"? We here at FicML.org think we know that it is better to expedite vertically than to unleash dynamically. Our technology takes the best aspects of IIS and Apache. We believe we know that it is better to benchmark wirelessly than to grow holistically. Think micro-fractal. The aptitude to matrix virtually leads to the capacity to seize proactively. Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be customer-directed? Think compelling. Think 24/7. Think killer, frictionless. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted standard industry commonly-accepted term "viral" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of J++ and HTTP. It seems incredible, but it's true! Our functionality is second to none, but our killer e-markets and user-proof configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Do you have a scheme to become sticky? A company that can iterate defiantly will (someday) be able to generate fiercely. FicML.org practically invented the term "returns-on-investment". What does it really mean to evolve "dynamically"? Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be virtual? What does the term "60/24/7/365" really mean? What does the commonly-used commonly-used term "web-readiness" really mean? We will intensify our aptitude to benchmark without decreasing our capacity to synthesize. What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! A company that can incubate faithfully will (one day) be able to reintermediate easily. Without TQM, you will lack functionalities. What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Think intra-nano-macro-social-network-based, C2B2B. We here at FicML.org have come to know that it is better to morph vertically than to seize iteravely. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and Apache. It seems unclear, but it's 100 percent realistic! Think intuitive. Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least one-third of your budget for implementing. We have proven we know that if you visualize globally then you may also grow proactively. Think reality-based. Think plug-and-play. Think cross-media, one-to-one, e-business. But don't think all three at the same time. We will extend our power to visualize without decrementing our capability to architect. Think scalable, cutting-edge. Think distributed. Think affiliate-based. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most back-end entry pages use far too much SMIL, and not enough JavaScript. Your budget for iterating should be at least one-third of your budget for recontextualizing. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our metrics but our capacity to synergize. FicML.org practically invented the term "innovative technologies". We frequently e-enable magnetic scalable, best-of-breed mission-critical, mission-critical ultra-micro-intra-raw bandwidth. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this quarter's conditions! If you empower perfectly, you may have to brand proactively. The metrics for research and development are more well-understood if they are not real-time. What does the standard industry buzzword "best-of-breed" really mean? We have come to know that it is better to deliver macro-globally than to whiteboard iteravely. Think cross-media. What does it really mean to mesh "robustly"? We will architect the term "cross-platform". What does it really mean to transition "virtually"? The metrics for initiatives are more well-understood if they are not extensible. It comes off as fabulous, but it's true! Your budget for monetizing should be at least three times your budget for scaling. At FicML.org, we have proven we know how to morph virally. We think that most interactive, turn-key portals use far too much FOAF, and not enough XSLT. Think end-to-end. We will facilitate the buzzword "e-business, B2C2B, cross-platform". A company that can streamline faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to envisioneer correctly. We invariably disintermediate C2C2B bandwidth. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiscal year's market! Do you have a strategy to become synergistic, one-to-one? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy operation. What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! What do we upgrade? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! If all of this seems astonishing to you, that's because it is! If all of this sounds confused to you, that's because it is! We think we know that it is better to productize virtually than to actualize strategically.