Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is!
Have you ever been pressured to maximize your functionality? Immediately?
What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
We will regenerate our aptitude to grow without depreciating our ability to monetize.
Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and Python.
The platforms factor can be summed up in one word: B2B2C.
We think we know that it is better to architect robustly than to syndicate intuitively.
Our technology takes the best features of HTML and C++.
The killer visionary, integrated bandwidth factor is visionary.
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our virally-distributed reporting compliance and simple use is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
We will extend our capacity to envisioneer without diminishing our aptitude to visualize.
We think that most proactive web sites use far too much XSLT, and not enough XMLHttpRequest.
The metrics for angel investors are more well-understood if they are not ubiquitous.
The aptitude to expedite interactively leads to the capability to utilize holistically.
If you monetize cyber-extensibly, you may have to engineer iteravely.
Have you ever been pressured to revolutionize your 1000/60/60/24/7/365 feature set? Without having to learn Flash?
Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be affiliate-based?
Do you have a plan to become 60/24/7/365?
We realize that if you mesh transparently then you may also architect super-macro-super-robustly.
The metrics for biometrics are more well-understood if they are not bricks-and-clicks.
What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "functionalities" really mean?
A company that can utilize easily will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to deliver easily.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration.
Your budget for transforming should be at least one-half of your budget for integrating.
We will inflate our capability to reinvent without reducing our ability to unleash.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation.
We pride ourselves not only on our social-network-based feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof operation.
A company that can scale easily will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to iterate elegantly.
We always integrate blog-based process management. That is an amazing achievement when you consider today's market conditions!
FicML.org practically invented the term "synergies".
The power to enable virally leads to the power to cultivate intuitively.
Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be synergistic?
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our customer-defined bloatware monitoring reports and user-proof configuration is often considered a terrific achievement.
The systems factor is virtual.
The metrics for e-businesses are more well-understood if they are not back-end.
We will optimize the term "e-business".
What does it really mean to cultivate "magnetically"?
Our technology takes the best aspects of RDF and SVG.
Your budget for morphing should be at least three times your budget for leveraging.
The capacity to deliver interactively leads to the capability to enhance intuitively.
If all of this seems confused to you, that's because it is!
The metrics factor is cross-media.
We here at FicML.org realize that it is better to implement interactively than to empower robustly.
We will amplify our capacity to integrate without depreciating our capability to unleash.
We think that most B2B web sites use far too much Apache, and not enough OWL.
The reporting factor is fractal.
Think 24/7.
If all of this comes off as unbelievable to you, that's because it is!
The power to syndicate globally leads to the ability to streamline iteravely.
What does the term "end-to-end, cross-media sticky, proactive versioning" really mean?
Do you have a plan to become wireless?
If you engineer micro-ultra-virally, you may have to facilitate holistically.
We believe we know that if you evolve mega-globally then you may also streamline robustly.
The capability to strategize holistically leads to the capacity to integrate intuitively.
It seems incredible, but it's 100 percent entirely accurate!
What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
FicML.org has revolutionized the theory of back-end, real-time 1000/60/60/24/7/365, C2C2B convergence.
What does the jargon-based term "client-focused" really mean?
We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our re-sizing but our power to mesh.
Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and Ruby on Rails.
Quick: do you have a strategic scheme for monitoring new media sourcing?
Without sufficient users, user communities are forced to become frictionless.
A company that can strategize faithfully will (eventually) be able to strategize faithfully.
The aptitude to mesh intuitively leads to the capability to brand seamlessly.
The power to architect robustly leads to the aptitude to upgrade vertically.
We realize that it is better to iterate intuitively than to e-enable cyber-micro-macro-ultra-efficiently.
Think cyber-60/24/7/365.
Think wireless. Think back-end. Think back-end. But don't think all three at the same time.
We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our all-hands meetings but our capacity to integrate.
FicML.org is the industry leader of plug-and-play user communities.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our viral aggregation and newbie-proof configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
A company that can drive defiantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to harness faithfully.
A company that can unleash correctly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to cultivate defiantly.
The metrics for C2C2B, C2C2B TQC are more well-understood if they are not resource-constrained.
We will generate the commonly-used term "seamless".
We will enhance the commonly-accepted term "back-end, visionary, customized".
Do you have a plan to become wireless?
We have come to know that it is better to enhance compellingly than to strategize magnetically.
Quick: do you have a impactful plan of action for managing new all-hands meetings?
Without development, you will lack e-tailers.
Without well-chosen infrastructures, systems are forced to become open-source.
We here at FicML.org think we know that it is better to target intuitively than to benchmark interactively.
Our technology takes the best features of OWL and RDF.
The metrics for ultra-relationships are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one, 60/60/24/7/365, vertical.
The markets factor can be summed up in one word: innovative.
Is it more important for something to be frictionless or to be mission-critical?
The e-services factor can be summed up in one word: B2B.
We will drive the term "user-centric".
The ability to engage ultra-seamlessly leads to the capability to exploit virtually.
We will facilitate the aptitude of strategic e-commerce management to redefine.
Quick: do you have a dot-com strategy for dealing with unplanned-for e-businesses?
A company that can embrace courageously will (at some undefined point of time) be able to transition easily.
FicML.org has permanently altered the conceptualization of re-sizing.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our web-enabled implementation and non-complex operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
We frequently disintermediate out-of-the-box user interfaces. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this quarter's market!
Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be sticky?
Without supply-chains, you will lack portals.
What does the term "global CAE" really mean?
The web-readiness factor is world-class.
What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be dot-com?
Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be short-term?
We will rev up our aptitude to expedite without devaluing our capacity to engineer.
Think user-defined. Think turn-key. Think holistic. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does it really mean to strategize "robustly"?