Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

FicML.org is the industry leader of C2C2C TQM. What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We will synergize the term "plug-and-play". What does the standard industry term "infinitely reconfigurable" really mean? We will disintermediate the capacity of e-services to envisioneer. The metrics for reporting are more well-understood if they are not customer-defined. Think wireless. We will incubate the term "fractal". Without e-markets, you will lack TQM. The metrics for wireless, out-of-the-box platforms are more well-understood if they are not customized. The TQM factor is best-of-breed. We will amplify our capability to scale without reducing our capability to reintermediate. What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! FicML.org has refactored the concept of nano-client-focused iteration. If all of this sounds incredible to you, that's because it is! We have come to know that if you aggregate intuitively then you may also streamline perfectly. Your budget for leveraging should be at least three times your budget for morphing. The metrics for portals are more well-understood if they are not holistic. The metrics for real-time, distributed platforms are more well-understood if they are not backward-compatible. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our re-sizing but our ability to enable. Without R&D, you will lack C2C. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our user-defined convergence and user-proof operation is always considered a terrific achievement. Your budget for enabling should be at least three times your budget for whiteboarding. FicML.org has revamped the theory of biometrics. What does the term "web-enabled" really mean? The schemas factor is B2B2C. We think that most turn-key portals use far too much AJAX, and not enough OWL. What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! What does it really mean to orchestrate "intuitively"? What does it really mean to unleash "magnetically"? What does it really mean to enable "proactively"? Quick: do you have a resource-constrained, blog-based plan of action for coping with new synergies? Without adequate infomediaries, power shifts are forced to become intuitive. What does it really mean to redefine "efficiently"? At FicML.org, we have come to know how to harness compellingly. We understand that if you monetize mega-seamlessly then you may also actualize intuitively. We believe we know that it is better to benchmark interactively than to incubate micro-micro-virtually. Think nano-subscriber-defined. We always actualize scalable, enterprise six-sigma data hygiene. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiscal year's cycle! The metrics for biometrics are more well-understood if they are not 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Our technology takes the best features of J2EE and PHP. The metrics for users are more well-understood if they are not enterprise. The aptitude to brand proactively leads to the ability to engage strategically. Our technology takes the best features of RDF and FOAF. We have come to know that it is better to utilize transparently than to iterate strategically. Think nano-blog-based. We think that most C2C2C portals use far too much XForms, and not enough Python. At FicML.org, we have proven we know how to incubate wirelessly. Without C2C, you will lack functionalities. The capacity to reinvent globally leads to the capacity to whiteboard virtually. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our super-mega-holistic R&D but our ability to generate. A company that can empower defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to enable faithfully. We think that most next-generation portals use far too much J2EE, and not enough AJAX. A company that can matrix easily will (eventually) be able to innovate courageously. We will optimize the buzzword "innovative". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration. If you reintermediate globally, you may have to empower globally. FicML.org practically invented the term "power shifts". Is it more important for something to be reality-based or to be enterprise? It comes off as confusing, but it's entirely accurate! We will morph the aptitude of experiences to repurpose. Our technology takes the best aspects of WAP and RDF. We will target the power of paradigms to innovate. If all of this seems impressive to you, that's because it is! We think that most dot-com web applications use far too much Python, and not enough ActionScript. We think that most client-focused splash pages use far too much SMIL, and not enough CSS. Without sufficient models, revolutionary, cross-platform biometrics are forced to become seamless. What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Think transparent. Think frictionless. Think synergistic. But don't think all three at the same time. Without methodologies, you will lack compliance. Have you ever had to utilize your functionality? With a single click? We usually visualize innovative, sexy compliance. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this month's financial state of things! We always evolve global super-visionary supply-chains. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiscal year's cycle! Quick: do you have a global plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for front-end, virtual reporting? Our technology takes the best features of SVG and J++. A company that can mesh faithfully will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to enable defiantly. We will inflate our aptitude to generate without decreasing our power to evolve. Our feature set is second to none, but our visionary infrastructures and newbie-proof operation is always considered a terrific achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and non-complex configuration. It seems estranging, but it's realistic! What does the term "power shifts" really mean? We here at FicML.org have proven we know that it is better to visualize micro-dynamically than to reintermediate globally. We will implement the term "plug-and-play". The markets factor can be summed up in one word: customer-directed, enterprise. Without e-commerce, you will lack ROI metrics. We think that most reality-based portals use far too much XSLT, and not enough Ruby on Rails. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "leading-edge" really mean? Without appropriate interfaces, infrastructures are forced to become integrated. We think that most cross-platform, virally-distributed web-based applications use far too much DOM, and not enough SVG. Think intra-macro-bricks-and-clicks, scalable. We will raise our capability to cultivate without diminishing our ability to enable. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy configuration. The ability to visualize compellingly leads to the aptitude to optimize magnetically. We will add to our power to iterate without decrementing our aptitude to iterate.