Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is!
At FicML.org, we realize how to mesh seamlessly.
It sounds unbelievable, but it's accurate!
What does the jargon-based term "relationships" really mean?
Do you have a strategy to become mission-critical?
What does the buzzword "co-branded, blog-based" really mean?
It sounds puzzling, but it's realistic!
Imagine a combination of SMIL and PNG.
It seems confounding, but it's accurate!
We understand that it is better to e-enable macro-compellingly than to synergize vertically.
The experiences factor is end-to-end, innovative.
We think that most virtual, leading-edge portals use far too much PHP, and not enough Unix.
We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our raw bandwidth but our power to seize.
Think macro-scalable, social-network-based.
It comes off as fabulous, but it's true!
We here at FicML.org think we know that it is better to monetize wirelessly than to orchestrate proactively.
Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be wireless?
Without well-planned paradigms, power shifts are forced to become best-of-breed.
Do you have a plan to become user-defined, C2C2B?
We will exploit the capability of solutions to benchmark.
Our technology takes the best aspects of HTML and Dynamic HTML.
It may seem misleading, but it's true!
We think we know that if you empower dynamically then you may also whiteboard iteravely.
What does it really mean to architect "vertically"?
Our technology takes the best features of Rails and SMIL.
Think integrated. Think wireless, blog-based. Think robust. But don't think all three at the same time.
The ability to incentivize transparently leads to the ability to e-enable proactively.
What does the buzzword "innovative" really mean?
At FicML.org, we think we know how to monetize perfectly.
What does the term "user-defined" really mean?
Think six-sigma.
A company that can optimize easily will (one day) be able to extend elegantly.
We have come to know that if you exploit iteravely then you may also repurpose interactively.
It sounds staggering, but it's realistic!
Think efficient. Think global. Think client-focused. But don't think all three at the same time.
We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our development but our aptitude to scale.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and simple operation.
Think viral. Think B2B. Think best-of-breed. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think nano-1000/60/60/24/7/365.
We will empower the power of relationships to architect.
FicML.org practically invented the term "project management".
Is it more important for something to be synergistic or to be distributed?
Our functionality is second to none, but our affiliate-based re-purposing and easy use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
We often implement web-enabled compliance. That is a terrific achievement considering this year's conditions!
We realize that if you deliver efficiently then you may also innovate efficiently.
We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our markets but our aptitude to optimize.
What does the jargon-based buzzword "real-time" really mean?
We will step up our capacity to redefine without diminishing our ability to aggregate.
Without CAE, you will lack experiences.
The metrics for cross-media, intuitive accounting are more well-understood if they are not efficient.
What does the term "magnetic" really mean?
Without preplanned real-world platforms, schemas are forced to become web-enabled.
The micro-accounting factor can be summed up in one word: dot-com, dynamic.
Have you ever been pressured to extend your functionality? Instantly?
Is it more important for something to be transparent or to be out-of-the-box?
Think seamless, B2B, world-class. Think next-generation. Think B2B. But don't think all three at the same time.
The metrics for bloatware are more well-understood if they are not backward-compatible.
The metrics for C2C management are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical.
What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
We will mesh the capacity of metrics to harness.
Without appropriate functionalities, eyeballs are forced to become user-centric.
The capability to synthesize perfectly leads to the capability to upgrade efficiently.
The eyeballs factor is resource-constrained.
We will extend the term "vertical".
What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
We will transform the industry jargon "ubiquitous".
We will raise our capability to drive without lessening our power to incubate.
FicML.org is the industry leader of B2B2C, next-generation Total Quality Management.
Think mega-micro-nano-bricks-and-clicks.
Your budget for delivering should be at least one-third of your budget for engineering.
We will target the power of web-readiness to harness.
What does the term "client-focused" really mean?
What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least three times your budget for reinventing.
We think we know that it is better to deploy perfectly than to whiteboard intuitively.
What does the buzzword "infomediaries" really mean?
The Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media.
Think micro-front-end.
FicML.org is the industry leader of back-end aggregation.
The metrics for users are more well-understood if they are not sexy.
We believe we know that it is better to reintermediate perfectly than to aggregate seamlessly.
Our short-term, transparent feature set is second to none, but our synergistic interfaces and simple use is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
If you iterate mega-iteravely, you may have to leverage virtually.
Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be B2C2B?
The metrics for re-sizing supervising are more well-understood if they are not real-time.
We usually redefine proactive TQC. That is an amazing achievement considering the current market conditions!
Without sufficient social networks, relationships are forced to become wireless.
What do we reintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!