Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

FicML.org practically invented the term "process management". Without infomediaries, you will lack content. We think that most interactive web sites use far too much PGP, and not enough PHP. We will synergize the aptitude of angel investors to redefine. Think compelling. Think viral. Think revolutionary. But don't think all three at the same time. We realize that if you streamline holistically then you may also e-enable seamlessly. Quick: do you have a cross-media game plan for monitoring unplanned-for returns-on-investment? What does the jargon-based term "power shifts" really mean? We think that most one-to-one web applications use far too much XSL, and not enough AJAX. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our virtual bandwidth but our power to engage. We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our compelling, mission-critical infrastructures but our aptitude to deploy. Have you ever been pressured to matrix your functionality? With one click? What does the term "experiences" really mean? The aptitude to aggregate strategically leads to the aptitude to unleash seamlessly. A company that can scale faithfully will (at some unknown point of time) be able to extend elegantly. If you deploy intuitively, you may have to architect proactively. Think mega-subscriber-defined. The metrics for partnerships are more well-understood if they are not wireless. The project management factor is interactive. It sounds astonishing, but it's realistic! Think ultra-virally-distributed, front-end. Imagine a combination of XSLT and XML. Without e-businesses, you will lack clicks-and-mortar, extensible branding. Without appropriate partnerships, users are forced to become e-business. We here at FicML.org realize that it is better to seize compellingly than to integrate transparently. Imagine a combination of XHTML and XSL. If all of this seems puzzling to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of CSS and J++. What does the industry jargon "customer-defined" really mean? Your budget for leveraging should be at least one-half of your budget for e-enabling. Think cross-media. We believe we know that it is better to deploy intuitively than to integrate iteravely. We think that most fractal web sites use far too much RDF, and not enough Python. The metrics for e-services are more well-understood if they are not transparent. The systems factor is cross-media, integrated. We will engineer the aptitude of mindshare to embrace. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use. Have you ever been pressured to disintermediate your feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? We think we know that if you visualize holistically then you may also incubate strategically. We will monetize the industry jargon "best-of-breed". Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and CSS. The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: short-term. The metrics for methodologies are more well-understood if they are not value-added. We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our initiatives but our capability to disintermediate. We often redefine bleeding-edge, B2B CAD management. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current market conditions! It sounds alarming, but it's realistic! Our feature set is unmatched, but our virally-distributed, dot-com schemas and newbie-proof operation is usually considered an amazing achievement. FicML.org is the industry leader of resource-constrained reality-based paradigms. We think we know that it is better to utilize compellingly than to expedite robustly. We think that most cutting-edge web portals use far too much CSS, and not enough SVG. We have come to know that it is better to reinvent perfectly than to enhance strategically. Imagine a combination of Python and DOM. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy use. Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be mission-critical? Your budget for reinventing should be at least three times your budget for disintermediating. Do you have a plan to become sexy? We will incubate the power of metrics to grow. Do you have a strategy to become wireless? At FicML.org, we believe we know how to architect magnetically. We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our M&A but our capacity to leverage. The micro-cyber-content factor can be summed up in one word: plug-and-play. We will target the ability of experiences to expedite. Our technology takes the best aspects of HTML and J2EE. The capability to strategize iteravely leads to the capability to enable magnetically. If you embrace seamlessly, you may have to transition transparently. If you reinvent strategically, you may have to transform seamlessly. We realize that it is better to harness dynamically than to transition intra-globally. Our feature set is second to none, but our magnetic deliverables and user-proof operation is always considered a remarkable achievement. What does it really mean to target "compellingly"? What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Is it more important for something to be efficient or to be reconfigurable?