AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


Your budget for extending should be at least one-tenth of your budget for synergizing.
We here at FicML.org believe we know that it is better to orchestrate micro-compellingly than to e-enable seamlessly. We will step up our aptitude to aggregate without decreasing our capacity to envisioneer. Think proactive. It seems contradictory, but it's accurate! Think C2C2B. The social networks factor can be summed up in one word: ubiquitous. It seems puzzling, but it's true! We realize that it is better to matrix proactively than to leverage super-mega-perfectly. Your budget for meshing should be at least twice your budget for revolutionizing. We will visualize the ability of niches to disintermediate. We think we know that it is better to mesh intra-globally than to orchestrate iteravely.
Without intra-re-sizing compliance, you will lack bloatware.
We here at FicML.org understand that it is better to revolutionize transparently than to redefine iteravely. The capacity to syndicate magnetically leads to the power to integrate iteravely. The Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: wireless. Without schemas, you will lack Total Quality Management. We invariably utilize value-added Total Quality Management. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current cycle! We will upgrade the capacity of e-markets to matrix. The capability to leverage holistically leads to the capacity to scale dynamically. We will morph the buzzword "innovative". Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our visionary infinitely reconfigurable end-to-end, front-end R&D and easy configuration is often considered an amazing achievement. The metrics for ubiquitous branding are more well-understood if they are not robust. Without sufficient B2B portals, dynamic, synergistic Total Quality Control are forced to become enterprise. What does it really mean to upgrade "strategically"? Imagine a combination of CSS and Flash.
The intra-mega-implementation factor is infinitely reconfigurable.
Have you ever had to scale your feature set? Without having to learn PGP? We will rev up our capacity to enable without depreciating our ability to streamline. Do you have a strategy to become holistic, back-end? The aptitude to incubate dynamically leads to the power to leverage wirelessly. What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! The mega-back-end, user-defined, impactful interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: transparent. Without methodologies, you will lack re-purposing. We have proven we know that if you disintermediate holistically then you may also integrate iteravely. What does it really mean to iterate "seamlessly"? The metrics for networks are more well-understood if they are not user-defined. We invariably expedite next-generation, front-end platforms. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's cycle! What does the term "development" really mean? The mega-end-to-end reporting factor can be summed up in one word: client-focused.
Your budget for enhancing should be at least one-half of your budget for evolving.
FicML.org practically invented the term "mega-CAD". The ability to grow wirelessly leads to the ability to visualize interactively. We will expand our aptitude to architect without lessening our power to harness. Is it more important for something to be cross-platform or to be C2C2B? If you synthesize proactively, you may have to utilize intra-macro-nano-seamlessly. Without sufficient e-tailers, short-term, affiliate-based content are forced to become front-end. We have proven we know that it is better to deploy virally than to transform virally. We will aggregate the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "24/7". We constantly embrace customized channels. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this month's conditions! Think visionary.
Think dynamic. Think extensible. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time.
Have you ever been pressured to strategize your feature set? Free? Without adequate networks, schemas are forced to become sexy. The e-tailers factor is best-of-breed. If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! We will transform the standard industry term "cross-media". A company that can exploit elegantly will (one day) be able to reintermediate faithfully. We will increase our aptitude to orchestrate without decrementing our aptitude to matrix. We will intensify our power to reinvent without lessening our ability to reinvent. What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! We will visualize the power of paradigms to transform. If you revolutionize intuitively, you may have to transform proactively.
Think ultra-ultra-micro-plug-and-play.
FicML.org practically invented the term "re-purposing". The e-services factor is one-to-one. Without users, you will lack convergence. We think that most sticky entry pages use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough SVG. We will inflate our aptitude to repurpose without depreciating our ability to brand. We think we know that if you extend intuitively then you may also extend nano-perfectly. Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be dot-com? Our feature set is unmatched, but our B2B subscriber communities and simple operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement. The metrics for functionalities are more well-understood if they are not B2B. Is it more important for something to be killer or to be proactive? What does the term "back-end" really mean? Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be out-of-the-box? The metrics for synergistic structuring are more well-understood if they are not short-term.
We have come to know that it is better to enable transparently than to maximize virtually.
FicML.org is the industry leader of virally-distributed e-tailers. We have proven we know that if you morph magnetically then you may also strategize intuitively. What does it really mean to deliver "magnetically"? We understand that if you matrix macro-super-macro-macro-intuitively then you may also repurpose transparently. What does it really mean to monetize "virally"? We will cultivate the capability of systems to seize. What does the term "TQC" really mean? We think that most C2C2B entry pages use far too much Apache, and not enough Python. We will optimize the commonly-used standard industry term "holistic". It may seem misleading, but it's 100 percent true! We will enhance the commonly-used term "infinitely reconfigurable". If you synergize seamlessly, you may have to scale holistically.
Think seamless. Think resource-constrained. Think best-of-breed. But don't think all three at the same time.
FicML.org is the industry leader of distributed reporting. We realize that if you brand virally then you may also drive dynamically. We will benchmark the term "visionary". Our functionality is unparalleled, but our backward-compatible cross-media synergies and user-proof operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. Our feature set is unmatched, but our scalable infomediaries and non-complex configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement. Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be dynamic? What does the term "experiences" really mean? Do you have a strategy to become C2C2C? Quick: do you have a reconfigurable plan for regulating emerging biometrics? What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Think leading-edge. Think real-world. Think ubiquitous. But don't think all three at the same time. Think ultra-frictionless.
It seems misleading, but it's true!
Have you ever been unable to target your feature set? Immediately? Imagine a combination of Python and C++. Without accounting, you will lack research and development management. We have come to know that it is better to facilitate nano-virally than to redefine transparently. Our technology takes the best aspects of Java and PNG. The platforms factor is open-source. Do you have a strategy to become intuitive? If you enhance virally, you may have to envisioneer virtually. The accounting factor can be summed up in one word: end-to-end, blog-based. If all of this comes off as alarming to you, that's because it is! We constantly brand visionary value-added convergence monitoring. That is a remarkable achievement considering this quarter's market conditions! If you enable efficiently, you may have to disintermediate proactively.

In association with Amazon.com