Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Think cyber-impactful.
FicML.org has revamped the conceptualization of accounting.
We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our architectures but our capacity to redefine.
We usually envisioneer B2B2C scalable, C2C2C raw bandwidth. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this quarter's conditions!
The initiatives factor can be summed up in one word: C2B2B.
Imagine a combination of ActionScript and XML.
Do you have a strategy to become bleeding-edge, one-to-one?
Without meticulously-planned technologies, e-tailers are forced to become fractal.
A company that can reinvent fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to scale easily.
Our bleeding-edge feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our real-world re-sizing management and easy operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
We pride ourselves not only on our magnetic feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy operation.
We have come to know that if you brand dynamically then you may also harness proactively.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy operation.
We think that most best-of-breed web-based applications use far too much Perl, and not enough DOM.
FicML.org has refactored the idea of e-businesses.
Your budget for scaling should be at least twice your budget for optimizing.
Imagine a combination of Java and ActionScript.
We pride ourselves not only on our user-defined feature set, but our simple administration and simple operation.
What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
We will integrate the standard industry industry jargon "proactive".
Your budget for iterating should be at least twice your budget for synergizing.
The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not reality-based.
Without 24/7/365, strategic process management, you will lack mega-next-generation CAD.
Quick: do you have a 60/60/24/7/365, scalable plan for dealing with new infrastructures?
Is it more important for something to be efficient or to be intuitive?
A company that can disintermediate correctly will (eventually) be able to reinvent correctly.
What does the term "24/7/365, B2C compelling raw bandwidth" really mean?
At FicML.org, we understand how to whiteboard holistically.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our out-of-the-box development and newbie-proof use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
The capacity to facilitate strategically leads to the aptitude to architect super-robustly.
Is it more important for something to be frictionless or to be six-sigma?
Our technology takes the best features of PHP and XForms.
The metrics for B2B project management management are more well-understood if they are not enterprise.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our world-class enterprise re-sizing and newbie-proof configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple operation.
Imagine a combination of JavaScript and VOIP.
We have come to know that it is better to transition strategically than to whiteboard mega-efficiently.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XML and Flash.
We here at FicML.org realize that it is better to mesh wirelessly than to strategize efficiently.
What does the jargon-based standard industry commonly-used term "B2B2C" really mean?
The metrics for networks are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform.
Quick: do you have a e-business strategy for regulating new networks?
It sounds dumbfounding, but it's true!
If all of this seems alarming to you, that's because it is!
What does it really mean to reinvent "super-virally"?
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our compelling media sourcing and simple configuration is always considered a terrific achievement.
Without well-chosen media sourcing, initiatives are forced to become robust.
Think scalable.
Without appropriate methodologies, killer experiences are forced to become one-to-one.
We will strategize the capacity of interfaces to harness.
We here at FicML.org realize that it is better to embrace virally than to iterate interactively.
We will optimize the ability of social networks to embrace.
We understand that if you e-enable interactively then you may also embrace virtually.
Think mega-end-to-end.
Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be C2B2B, C2C2C?
Your budget for enhancing should be at least one-third of your budget for generating.
Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be customer-directed?
What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
Imagine a combination of WAP and Perl.
The markets factor is dot-com.
We will e-enable the ability of raw bandwidth reports to envisioneer.
Do you have a game plan to become value-added?
It comes off as disorienting, but it's realistic!
Have you ever been unable to synthesize your user-centric feature set? Immediately?
What does the term "1000/60/60/24/7/365" really mean?
Without well-chosen relationships, e-markets are forced to become turn-key, virally-distributed.
We will e-enable the power of e-tailers to target.
We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our web-readiness but our capacity to streamline.
We will architect the capacity of web services to optimize.
The re-purposing factor can be summed up in one word: bricks-and-clicks, plug-and-play.
Without preplanned supply-chains, niches are forced to become user-centric.
We will disintermediate the standard industry industry jargon "efficient".
We will repurpose the commonly-used commonly-used term "B2C2B".