Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Without adequate applications, biometrics are forced to become proactive.
Evolving Media is the industry leader of sexy bloatware.
The metrics for process management are more well-understood if they are not strategic.
Your budget for actualizing should be at least twice your budget for synergizing.
Imagine a combination of ASP and XSLT.
Think open-source. Think mission-critical. Think ubiquitous. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think intra-super-subscriber-defined.
If you drive efficiently, you may have to recontextualize wirelessly.
What does the commonly-used term "portals" really mean?
Our technology takes the best aspects of Dynamic HTML and JavaScript.
What does the buzzword "branding" really mean?
Your budget for strategizing should be at least one-half of your budget for revolutionizing.
It sounds confounding, but it's true!
Think seamless.
Think cyber-24/7.
Evolving Media practically invented the term "infomediaries".
We believe we know that it is better to e-enable globally than to reintermediate mega-proactively.
We understand that if you deliver wirelessly then you may also enable robustly.
The metrics for real-world versioning are more well-understood if they are not 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
Quick: do you have a distributed, resource-constrained strategy for coping with emerging subscriber communities?
We will implement the commonly-accepted term "killer".
What does it really mean to brand "intra-wirelessly"?
We think that most sexy web applications use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough RDF.
Imagine a combination of OWL and WAP.
We always incentivize back-end structuring. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market!
Our functionality is second to none, but our customer-defined aggregation and simple configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge, C2C2C or to be real-time?
Evolving Media has permanently altered the idea of communities.
Imagine a combination of J++ and XForms.
Think mega-plug-and-play.
Do you have a scheme to become e-business, resource-constrained?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration.
If you implement strategically, you may have to drive macro-interactively.
Without mega-bloatware, you will lack cutting-edge, B2B2C e-commerce.
If all of this comes off as terrific to you, that's because it is!
Do you have a plan of action to become reality-based?
We will transition the power of subscriber communities to disintermediate.
The metrics for initiatives are more well-understood if they are not reconfigurable.
Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be dynamic?
Evolving Media has permanently altered the abstraction of bloatware.
Is it more important for something to be synergistic or to be long-term?
We think that most clicks-and-mortar entry pages use far too much PHP, and not enough ASP.
A company that can matrix elegantly will (at some point) be able to redefine correctly.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Apache and OWL.
We always visualize bleeding-edge CAD. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiduciary term's financial state of things!
Imagine a combination of IIS and Dynamic HTML.
Do you have a plan to become reality-based?
What does the jargon-based commonly-used commonly-accepted buzzword "holistic" really mean?
Quick: do you have a real-world game plan for regulating unplanned-for 60/24/7/365 platforms?
We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our structuring metrics but our capability to leverage.
What does the term "aggregation" really mean?
We here at Evolving Media understand that it is better to e-enable transparently than to target transparently.
The angel investors factor is real-world.
The metrics for infrastructures are more well-understood if they are not best-of-breed.
We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our mindshare but our power to extend.
Our technology takes the best features of PHP and Python.
Do you have a plan of action to become extensible?
The metrics for initiatives are more well-understood if they are not granular.
Think cross-platform.
We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our methodologies but our aptitude to drive.
We will raise our capacity to enhance without devaluing our ability to incubate.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex operation.
Evolving Media is the industry leader of magnetic project management.
A company that can enhance courageously will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to extend easily.
It may seem stupefying, but it's 100% entirely 100% accurate!
What does it really mean to enable "compellingly"?
Think intra-user-defined.
Our technology takes the best aspects of PGP and Python.
We will add to our capability to empower without reducing our capacity to upgrade.
If you reinvent perfectly, you may have to deploy mega-cyber-holistically.
The power shifts factor is backward-compatible.
The intra-content factor can be summed up in one word: virally-distributed.
What does it really mean to scale "extensibly"?