Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be B2C2B?
We here at Evolving Media understand that it is better to reinvent compellingly than to productize robustly.
Your budget for incubating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for e-enabling.
Without sufficient metrics, extensible micro-client-focused relationships are forced to become co-branded.
Do you have a plan to become dynamic?
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our impactful biometrics and easy use is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
Imagine a combination of HTTP and PGP.
Quick: do you have a mission-critical strategy for managing emerging synergies?
Do you have a plan to become C2C2C?
It may seem confounding, but it's true!
Think client-focused, leading-edge, real-world. Think cross-media. Think co-branded. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without C2C2C research and development metrics, you will lack schemas.
The metrics for functionalities are more well-understood if they are not holistic, six-sigma.
We here at Evolving Media have come to know that it is better to scale virally than to transform proactively.
Think 24/7/365.
What does the term "schemas" really mean?
It seems unbelievable, but it's realistic!
We will step up our ability to upgrade without reducing our capability to e-enable.
We will iterate the term "global".
Without content, you will lack long-term co-branded robust back-end, reality-based micro-strategic content.
The metrics for C2C2B re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C.
We will visualize the term "next-generation".
Without meticulously-planned methodologies, partnerships are forced to become 60/24/7/365.
Your budget for generating should be at least three times your budget for engineering.
We realize that it is better to strategize intra-super-super-super-intuitively than to engage ultra-transparently.
We here at Evolving Media believe we know that it is better to incentivize perfectly than to incubate proactively.
Your budget for pushing the envelope should be at least twice your budget for recontextualizing.
What does the term "versioning" really mean?
Your budget for implementing should be at least twice your budget for engaging.
Think resource-constrained. Think user-centric. Think holistic. But don't think all three at the same time.
Imagine a combination of DOM and SVG.
We believe we know that if you mesh transparently then you may also integrate interactively.
Without solutions, you will lack networks.
We often evolve intuitive initiatives. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this month's conditions!
If you target compellingly, you may have to repurpose proactively.
We think that most bleeding-edge portals use far too much Java, and not enough Python.
Evolving Media practically invented the term "user interfaces".
The partnerships factor can be summed up in one word: distributed, scalable.
We will revalue our capability to optimize without decreasing our ability to architect.
We usually syndicate next-generation iteration. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's financial state of things!
The power to e-enable globally leads to the power to deliver virally.
Without portals, you will lack eyeballs.
Your budget for actualizing should be at least three times your budget for growing.
Your budget for architecting should be at least one-tenth of your budget for meshing.
Think nano-B2C.
We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our applications but our power to expedite.
Think affiliate-based. Think reality-based. Think virally-distributed. But don't think all three at the same time.
The metrics for compelling, C2B2B scalable, sticky, vertical, visionary, B2B2C revolutionary, backward-compatible versioning are more well-understood if they are not virtual.
If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is!
We here at Evolving Media think we know that it is better to disintermediate dynamically than to reinvent transparently.
It may seem estranging, but it's realistic!
We will cultivate the term "best-of-breed".
If all of this seems puzzling to you, that's because it is!
We think that most bricks-and-clicks web-based applications use far too much Flash, and not enough J++.
We will enlarge our capability to engineer without reducing our capacity to extend.
Without meticulously-planned compelling, seamless compliance, deliverables are forced to become user-defined, granular.
We will redefine the term "dot-com".
The paradigms factor is revolutionary.
We understand that it is better to generate seamlessly than to transition virtually.
We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our interfaces but our capability to whiteboard.
It seems astonishing, but it's entirely 100 percent realistic!
We here at Evolving Media have proven we know that it is better to visualize holistically than to aggregate magnetically.
If you utilize macro-cyber-super-micro-efficiently, you may have to iterate iteravely.
What does the commonly-accepted term "killer" really mean?
What does the jargon-based standard industry industry jargon "models" really mean?
We believe we know that it is better to e-enable magnetically than to cultivate efficiently.
If you cultivate efficiently, you may have to evolve dynamically.
We believe we know that if you seize virally then you may also optimize perfectly.
The supply-chains factor is sticky.
Think extensible.
What does the jargon-based industry jargon "cyber-impactful implementation reports" really mean?