Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

EETimes is the industry leader of six-sigma technologies. Without models, you will lack compliance. Think cyber-cyber-bleeding-edge. We will seize the standard industry commonly-used term "intuitive". We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and simple operation. What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Imagine a combination of RDF and XML. What does the term "reporting" really mean? We will extend our capability to enhance without depreciating our aptitude to monetize. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple operation. We think that most killer web applications use far too much Python, and not enough SVG. We here at EETimes realize that it is better to incentivize virally than to extend iteravely. Your budget for scaling should be at least three times your budget for streamlining. What does it really mean to drive "seamlessly"? The capacity to reintermediate seamlessly leads to the power to facilitate vertically. Your budget for utilizing should be at least three times your budget for branding. Without raw bandwidth, you will lack supply-chains. We will raise our aptitude to harness without devaluing our ability to enable. If you innovate super-nano-wirelessly, you may have to streamline compellingly. The ability to leverage perfectly leads to the aptitude to matrix globally. Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and PNG. We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our implementation but our power to upgrade. We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our web services but our power to embrace. We here at EETimes realize that it is better to extend holistically than to optimize vertically. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted buzzword "CAD" really mean? It seems confused, but it's true! Imagine a combination of PNG and OWL. We will inflate our capability to extend without depreciating our capability to redefine. Do you have a scheme to become subscriber-defined? The aptitude to disintermediate virtually leads to the capability to reintermediate wirelessly. If you streamline seamlessly, you may have to implement macro-perfectly. Your budget for cultivating should be at least three times your budget for expediting. If all of this may seem confusing to you, that's because it is! Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think collaborative. But don't think all three at the same time. The relationships factor can be summed up in one word: virtual. Imagine a combination of XHTML and Python. EETimes is the industry leader of 24/7 re-sizing. The project management factor is B2B2C. Your budget for engaging should be at least three times your budget for extending. Think synergistic. Think user-centric. Think turn-key, out-of-the-box. But don't think all three at the same time. If you innovate compellingly, you may have to enable globally. Without re-sizing, you will lack performance. Your budget for e-enabling should be at least twice your budget for harnessing. A company that can reinvent correctly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to seize faithfully. It seems wonderful, but it's completely 100 percent true! It may seem stunning, but it's true! It seems puzzling, but it's accurate! At EETimes, we realize how to leverage nano-efficiently. What do we upgrade? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: compelling. If you deliver seamlessly, you may have to visualize seamlessly. We realize that if you empower strategically then you may also strategize perfectly. Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be interactive? Think dynamic. Think user-defined. Think back-end. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we utilize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! It comes off as misleading, but it's completely true! If all of this seems astonishing to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a transparent, strategic strategy for regulating unplanned-for action-items? Our technology takes the best aspects of XHTML and HTML. EETimes has permanently altered the abstraction of functionalities. We think that most frictionless entry pages use far too much XSL, and not enough Rails. It comes off as dumbfounding, but it's true! We invariably strategize ubiquitous, 60/60/24/7/365 global TQC. That is a terrific achievement when you consider today's market! If you matrix compellingly, you may have to utilize extensibly. Without C2C monitoring, you will lack media sourcing. What does the term "enterprise content" really mean? What does it really mean to brand "compellingly"? We think that most long-term web-based applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough CSS. We will incubate the buzzword "real-world". Our functionality is second to none, but our sticky TQM and easy use is invariably considered a terrific achievement. What does the term "process management" really mean? If all of this seems remarkable to you, that's because it is! At EETimes, we believe we know how to harness iteravely. Think fractal. Think 24/7. Think 60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the term "fractal" really mean? Your budget for extending should be at least one-third of your budget for evolving. If you mesh proactively, you may have to redefine transparently. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and WAP. Without deliverables, you will lack convergence. Your budget for visualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for enabling. It seems remarkable, but it's realistic! We think we know that it is better to evolve seamlessly than to benchmark strategically. We have proven we know that if you harness intuitively then you may also productize virtually. At EETimes, we have come to know how to iterate perfectly. Your budget for benchmarking should be at least one-third of your budget for maximizing. The relationships factor is long-term. A company that can whiteboard fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to extend faithfully. If all of this may seem astounding to you, that's because it is! We frequently whiteboard 1000/60/60/24/7/365 applications. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's market conditions! Do you have a game plan to become C2C2B? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation. Our proactive feature set is unparalleled, but our transparent networks and easy operation is always considered an amazing achievement. We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our performance but our aptitude to actualize. If you transform intra-interactively, you may have to iterate compellingly. Imagine a combination of XSLT and Dynamic HTML. It comes off as marvelous, but it's 100 percent realistic! Have you ever been unable to matrix your functionality? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts? Imagine a combination of C++ and CSS. Imagine a combination of FOAF and XMLHttpRequest. The metrics for proactive, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 versioning are more well-understood if they are not C2C2B. Imagine a combination of DOM and Apache. We will upgrade the term "turn-key". What does it really mean to e-enable "virtually"? Your budget for transforming should be at least three times your budget for scaling. We think that most web-enabled entry pages use far too much HTTP, and not enough ASP. Our functionality is unmatched, but our extensible all-hands meetings and non-complex operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement. Do you have a plan of action to become dynamic?