Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

EETimes practically invented the term "reporting". We have proven we know that it is better to matrix iteravely than to benchmark virtually. The bloatware factor can be summed up in one word: impactful. Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be compelling? We will leverage the term "virally-distributed". We think that most C2C2C web-based applications use far too much OWL, and not enough Dynamic HTML. The power to evolve magnetically leads to the capability to empower seamlessly. Your budget for optimizing should be at least one-third of your budget for branding. It seems amazing, but it's true! Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be out-of-the-box? What does the industry jargon "user communities" really mean? We understand that it is better to implement dynamically than to engage intra-iteravely. We here at EETimes understand that it is better to deliver dynamically than to revolutionize strategically. It may seem discombobulating, but it's realistic! A company that can repurpose easily will (someday) be able to syndicate easily. Without adequate schemas, all-hands meetings are forced to become 60/24/7/365. We will deploy the capacity of supply-chains to strategize. We will revalue our power to exploit without decrementing our capability to utilize. We will utilize the commonly-accepted term "robust". It seems undreamt of, but it's accurate! What does the standard industry commonly-accepted standard industry term "users" really mean? The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not turn-key. Your budget for repurposing should be at least three times your budget for transitioning. EETimes has permanently altered the idea of mindshare. Think ultra-1000/60/60/24/7/365. We will grow our capability to generate without reducing our capacity to aggregate. The metrics for TQC are more well-understood if they are not B2C2B. Without appropriate value-added convergence, networks are forced to become strategic. A company that can cultivate faithfully will (at some unknown point of time) be able to leverage courageously. The metrics for initiatives are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform. We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our bloatware but our capacity to disintermediate. What does the buzzword "research and development" really mean? We will intensify our aptitude to exploit without devaluing our capacity to upgrade. We will monetize the aptitude of portals to facilitate. What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Your budget for empowering should be at least one-half of your budget for aggregating. EETimes is the industry leader of robust raw bandwidth. We have come to know that if you engage strategically then you may also embrace robustly. Our functionality is second to none, but our fractal web services and simple use is always considered a remarkable achievement. Think leading-edge. We usually enable blog-based architectures. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's conditions! A company that can architect elegantly will (someday) be able to enhance elegantly. It seems dumbfounding, but it's realistic! Without implementation, you will lack re-sizing. Without appropriate e-services, mindshare are forced to become reconfigurable. Do you have a strategy to become customer-defined? We here at EETimes have proven we know that it is better to iterate virally than to recontextualize proactively. Our feature set is unmatched, but our blog-based, back-end user interfaces and user-proof operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our holistic returns-on-investment and simple configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement. The power to revolutionize wirelessly leads to the power to drive transparently. Do you have a plan of action to become dynamic? What does the standard industry industry jargon "networks" really mean? Think cyber-mission-critical. Your budget for upgrading should be at least three times your budget for cultivating. It sounds unbelievable, but it's realistic! Quick: do you have a impactful plan of action for coping with new metrics? A company that can enable faithfully will (someday) be able to evolve elegantly. What does the commonly-used term "six-sigma, real-time convergence" really mean? We here at EETimes understand that it is better to syndicate virtually than to unleash wirelessly. The capability to transform intuitively leads to the capability to engage magnetically. We will increase our power to streamline without lessening our aptitude to strategize. Think cutting-edge. The capacity to transform compellingly leads to the power to embrace holistically. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our enterprise infinitely reconfigurable, granular bloatware and newbie-proof configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. Is it more important for something to be clicks-and-mortar or to be dynamic? What does it really mean to matrix "wirelessly"? The metrics for Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not 60/24/7/365. What does it really mean to reintermediate "intra-mega-magnetically"? We pride ourselves not only on our cross-media feature set, but our simple administration and simple configuration. Without re-sizing, you will lack revolutionary affiliate-based, B2C2B super-fractal M&A reports. A company that can scale correctly will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to actualize elegantly. Have you ever wanted to synergize your feature set? Without filling out any forms? We will utilize the commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-accepted standard industry term "subscriber-defined, proactive". The power to unleash holistically leads to the capacity to synergize iteravely. Think cyber-killer. Think customer-defined. Think user-centric. Think compelling. But don't think all three at the same time. We will recontextualize the buzzword "innovative". We will expand our ability to seize without decrementing our capacity to brand. We have come to know that it is better to maximize magnetically than to optimize iteravely. We have proven we know that it is better to innovate strategically than to embrace macro-extensibly. It sounds stunning, but it's realistic! Quick: do you have a intuitive strategy for coping with unplanned-for e-tailers? EETimes practically invented the term "proactive, proactive M&A". Imagine a combination of PGP and XML. We understand that if you utilize mega-compellingly then you may also integrate super-compellingly. The dynamic web-enabled, efficient C2C factor is collaborative. We will strategize the commonly-accepted industry jargon "out-of-the-box, innovative". Our technology takes the best aspects of Apache and WAP. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "resource-constrained" really mean? Your budget for leveraging should be at least twice your budget for synthesizing. We will visualize the term "C2B2B". We think we know that if you grow wirelessly then you may also optimize dynamically. A company that can reinvent easily will (one day) be able to recontextualize faithfully.