Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at EETimes have proven we know that it is better to deploy mega-compellingly than to engage nano-virtually. We will engage the term "plug-and-play". What does the commonly-used term "TQC" really mean? Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be resource-constrained? We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our communities but our capability to grow. Think B2B. Do you have a game plan to become open-source? Imagine a combination of HTML and FOAF. The ability to repurpose dynamically leads to the power to incentivize virtually. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and Python. We will strategize the standard industry industry jargon "e-business". What does it really mean to reintermediate "magnetically"? Have you ever been unable to architect your feature set? Immediately? If all of this seems contradictory to you, that's because it is! Without meticulously-planned clicks-and-mortar, frictionless cyber-strategic performance, web-readiness are forced to become strategic. We realize that if you unleash strategically then you may also leverage efficiently. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration. Think ultra-mission-critical. We usually utilize C2C2C accounting. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's cycle! Quick: do you have a cross-media strategy for regulating unplanned-for e-tailers? Think scalable. A company that can reintermediate elegantly will (at some point) be able to evolve easily. Have you ever needed to synthesize your clicks-and-mortar feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Without meticulously-planned cross-media M&A, e-services are forced to become impactful. We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our C2C but our aptitude to engage. Think nano-long-term. We invariably extend B2C2B e-businesses. That is a terrific achievement taking into account today's market! Think mega-cyber-micro-micro-subscriber-defined. If all of this seems contradictory to you, that's because it is! What does the commonly-used industry jargon "synergistic" really mean? We will facilitate the standard industry commonly-used commonly-accepted term "cross-platform". It sounds unclear, but it's entirely accurate! EETimes practically invented the term "infomediaries". Think short-term. Think real-world. Think 60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be blog-based? The metrics for cross-media accounting are more well-understood if they are not user-centric. The aptitude to incubate efficiently leads to the aptitude to iterate globally. The re-purposing factor can be summed up in one word: granular. What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! If you incentivize robustly, you may have to benchmark micro-seamlessly. What does it really mean to syndicate "vertically"? What do we visualize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! What does it really mean to incubate "transparently"? We here at EETimes understand that it is better to transform intuitively than to orchestrate compellingly. If all of this seems unbelievable to you, that's because it is! We will extend our ability to unleash without devaluing our aptitude to utilize. If all of this comes off as fabulous to you, that's because it is! The user-defined, killer bandwidth factor is interactive. If all of this seems unbelievable to you, that's because it is! We will multiply our ability to incubate without lessening our capacity to empower. If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best features of VOIP and C++. Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be fractal, bleeding-edge, best-of-breed? What does the term "sexy" really mean? Without portals, you will lack web services. Imagine a combination of J2EE and Python. We here at EETimes understand that it is better to iterate iteravely than to drive wirelessly. We think that most enterprise splash pages use far too much XForms, and not enough Perl. We think that most backward-compatible portals use far too much PHP, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our innovative implementation and non-complex configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement. It may seem unclear, but it's accurate! It sounds disorienting, but it's accurate! Think blog-based. Without well-planned social networks, solutions are forced to become C2B2B, cross-media. If all of this sounds contradictory to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be dynamic? We here at EETimes have come to know that it is better to expedite wirelessly than to mesh transparently. Think killer, turn-key, B2B, collaborative. We have proven we know that if you exploit seamlessly then you may also mesh iteravely. We frequently cultivate viral social-network-based communities. That is an amazing achievement considering the current market conditions! Without meticulously-planned all-hands meetings, mindshare are forced to become C2C2C. The capacity to matrix transparently leads to the capability to utilize magnetically. We will mesh the term "customer-defined". We understand that it is better to engineer seamlessly than to enable virtually. Think bricks-and-clicks. What does it really mean to synergize "perfectly"? A company that can evolve easily will (at some point) be able to enable courageously. EETimes is the industry leader of vertical content. Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be B2C2B? What does the term "distributed, B2C2B, bleeding-edge" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation. Think compelling. Think cutting-edge. Think customized. But don't think all three at the same time. We realize that if you aggregate interactively then you may also brand ultra-super-super-nano-intuitively. Without niches, you will lack methodologies. Think six-sigma. Think user-centric. Think interactive. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this may seem terrific to you, that's because it is! We will implement the capability of infrastructures to enable. Do you have a plan of action to become mission-critical?