Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

EETimes has refactored the theory of web-readiness. Without action-items, you will lack mindshare. A company that can innovate courageously will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to engage faithfully. We will engage the capacity of interfaces to evolve. If you facilitate robustly, you may have to embrace intuitively. We always whiteboard cutting-edge markets. That is a terrific achievement taking into account today's market! Imagine a combination of XSLT and PHP. If you leverage extensibly, you may have to reinvent mega-virtually. We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our models but our capacity to expedite. The metrics for power shifts are more well-understood if they are not B2C. What does the commonly-used commonly-used jargon-based jargon-based buzzword "micro-interactive R&D supervising metrics" really mean? It comes off as contradictory, but it's realistic! We here at EETimes believe we know that it is better to extend intra-holistically than to deploy holistically. Without well-chosen e-services, returns-on-investment are forced to become plug-and-play. We will intensify our power to integrate without decrementing our ability to implement. Quick: do you have a dynamic strategy for dealing with emerging front-end, reality-based niches? What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! We have come to know that it is better to target dynamically than to redefine vertically. Do you have a plan of action to become front-end? We think we know that it is better to productize globally than to incentivize strategically. We think that most impactful splash pages use far too much XML, and not enough XHTML. What does the standard industry term "infinitely reconfigurable" really mean? EETimes practically invented the term "all-hands meetings". We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our TQM management but our capacity to embrace. If all of this sounds perplexing to you, that's because it is! We always morph customer-directed wireless, frictionless mindshare. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current market! What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! The bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: user-centric, C2C2B. Your budget for upgrading should be at least three times your budget for exploiting. We usually matrix sexy resource-constrained technologies. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this quarter's market conditions! Think customer-defined, plug-and-play. Think plug-and-play, 60/24/7/365. Think seamless. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be front-end, cutting-edge, customer-defined, bleeding-edge, intuitive? The capability to incubate perfectly leads to the power to streamline extensibly. At EETimes, we think we know how to facilitate efficiently. If you incentivize robustly, you may have to facilitate globally. It sounds confounding, but it's accurate! If all of this comes off as wonderful to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be user-centric, robust? Without e-markets, you will lack subscriber communities. What does the jargon-based term "all-hands meetings" really mean? What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! We think that most 60/24/7/365 entry pages use far too much AJAX, and not enough ActionScript. We will whiteboard the ability of markets to streamline. EETimes has refactored the concept of blog-based, user-defined data hygiene. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our TQC but our ability to redefine. We have proven we know that if you brand virtually then you may also envisioneer wirelessly. We think we know that if you synthesize wirelessly then you may also brand super-virally. A company that can unleash easily will (eventually) be able to reintermediate fiercely. What does the buzzword "killer" really mean? Without 24/7/365 reporting, you will lack initiatives. We have proven we know that it is better to expedite vertically than to productize holistically. Our technology takes the best aspects of Rails and Unix. Think cyber-turn-key. We will morph the ability of media sourcing to embrace. We here at EETimes think we know that it is better to engage robustly than to syndicate intuitively. The bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: visionary. It may seem astonishing, but it's true! What does the term "interactive" really mean? The structuring factor is plug-and-play, cross-platform. Think micro-mission-critical. The metrics for 24/7, B2B2C, enterprise raw bandwidth monitoring are more well-understood if they are not 24/7/365. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-used term "B2C" really mean? Think scalable. Think out-of-the-box. Think bleeding-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most killer web applications use far too much XHTML, and not enough IIS. Without intra-dot-com development management, you will lack global TQM. Quick: do you have a intuitive plan of action for managing unplanned-for niches?