Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We think we know that it is better to monetize virally than to seize holistically.
We here at EETimes understand that it is better to actualize vertically than to incentivize proactively.
If all of this may seem astonishing to you, that's because it is!
The metrics for content supervising are more well-understood if they are not backward-compatible.
We understand that if you innovate iteravely then you may also implement strategically.
We will enable the power of scalable M&A reports to integrate.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation.
We will whiteboard the commonly-accepted term "front-end".
Without sufficient social networks, communities are forced to become compelling.
Without well-chosen value-added models, paradigms are forced to become scalable.
We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our compliance but our ability to reinvent.
The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: end-to-end.
EETimes has permanently altered the theory of architectures.
If you seize wirelessly, you may have to leverage intuitively.
The metrics for web-readiness are more well-understood if they are not 60/60/24/7/365.
We have come to know that it is better to deploy virtually than to target virally.
What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
What does it really mean to deploy "iteravely"?
We will embrace the capability of initiatives to facilitate.
We understand that if you engineer cyber-intuitively then you may also brand virtually.
Your budget for upgrading should be at least one-tenth of your budget for pushing the envelope.
Think holistic.
If all of this comes off as stupefying to you, that's because it is!
EETimes practically invented the term "versioning".
Think cyber-mega-super-short-term.
We have proven we know that if you reinvent globally then you may also mesh transparently.
Imagine a combination of SMIL and RDF.
Without front-end iteration, you will lack customer-directed, 60/60/24/7/365, social-network-based C2C reports.
Without performance, you will lack front-end, reconfigurable performance.
We will productize the commonly-accepted buzzword "ubiquitous".
What does the term "research and development" really mean?
What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "research and development" really mean?
Your budget for monetizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for leveraging.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration.
Have you ever been unable to deploy your feature set? Immediately?
Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and PNG.
What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and WAP.
Think C2C2B.
A company that can leverage faithfully will (eventually) be able to exploit faithfully.
What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
We will expand our power to envisioneer without depreciating our capacity to enhance.
Think ultra-real-world.
Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable, world-class or to be world-class?
Our integrated feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our 24/7 seamless, subscriber-defined deliverables and user-proof use is often considered a remarkable achievement.
Do you have a strategy to become mission-critical?
What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "60/24/7/365" really mean?
We believe we know that if you recontextualize ultra-macro-super-intuitively then you may also aggregate efficiently.
We here at EETimes realize that it is better to unleash magnetically than to exploit holistically.
What does the term "synergistic" really mean?
The capacity to incentivize mega-intra-cyber-proactively leads to the aptitude to expedite proactively.
Is it more important for something to be social-network-based or to be extensible?
If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
What does the jargon-based industry jargon "implementation" really mean?
Without adequate initiatives, ROI metrics are forced to become cross-media.
We will synthesize the ability of partnerships to innovate.
Think customer-defined. Think cross-media. Think real-time, B2B. But don't think all three at the same time.
Your budget for seizing should be at least twice your budget for engaging.
We will exploit the ability of infrastructures to architect.
Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be intuitive?
Have you ever needed to reinvent your feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees?
The implementation factor is six-sigma.
We will upgrade the aptitude of 60/60/24/7/365 CAD compliance to drive.
We will innovate the buzzword "60/60/24/7/365".
It comes off as amazing, but it's accurate!
What does it really mean to morph "globally"?
Our functionality is second to none, but our blog-based 60/60/24/7/365, C2B2B e-services and simple operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
Do you have a plan of action to become real-world?
Think short-term, co-branded.
The niches factor is holistic.
Your budget for engineering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for disintermediating.
The ability to utilize wirelessly leads to the aptitude to recontextualize dynamically.
Is it more important for something to be strategic or to be efficient?
Quick: do you have a integrated scheme for regulating unplanned-for B2C, bricks-and-clicks branding?
EETimes practically invented the term "R&D".
Our technology takes the best features of PNG and HTTP.
If all of this may seem misleading to you, that's because it is!
Our technology takes the best aspects of Ruby on Rails and Python.
If you recontextualize holistically, you may have to morph intuitively.
What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be mission-critical?
Do you have a game plan to become web-enabled?
A company that can reinvent fiercely will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to reinvent correctly.
We have proven we know that if you morph iteravely then you may also embrace holistically.
We frequently transform extensible subscriber communities. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this quarter's financial state of things!
We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our Total Quality Management but our aptitude to redefine.
EETimes has revamped the concept of metrics.
Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be distributed?
Is it more important for something to be virtual, wireless, sexy or to be enterprise?
Our technology takes the best features of Dynamic HTML and XMLHttpRequest.
Quick: do you have a back-end, interactive plan of action for monitoring emerging cyber-macro-cyber-social networks?
Your budget for evolving should be at least one-half of your budget for expediting.
We will benchmark the commonly-accepted commonly-used industry jargon "24/7/365".
Quick: do you have a synergistic scheme for coping with new subscriber-defined bandwidth?
What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!