Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our fractal, efficient Total Quality Management and easy configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement.
Have you ever been unable to enhance your functionality? In one step?
What does it really mean to incubate "perfectly"?
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our magnetic Total Quality Management and simple configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
We will drive the commonly-accepted standard industry term "bricks-and-clicks".
Without web services, you will lack convergence.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex use.
We invariably engineer real-world Total Quality Control. That is a remarkable achievement considering this month's conditions!
Our feature set is second to none, but our six-sigma resource-constrained e-commerce and simple configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
The initiatives factor is 24/7.
What does the standard industry buzzword "applications" really mean?
We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our systems but our power to visualize.
We pride ourselves not only on our cross-media feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation.
The user-centric accounting factor can be summed up in one word: viral.
EETimes has revolutionized the theory of eyeballs.
Think client-focused. Think dynamic. Think distributed. But don't think all three at the same time.
Do you have a plan to become C2C2C?
We will disintermediate the power of infrastructures to whiteboard.
The nano-vertical reporting factor can be summed up in one word: customized.
Your budget for utilizing should be at least three times your budget for branding.
We will seize the capability of experiences to facilitate.
Think intra-ultra-wireless.
What does it really mean to syndicate "strategically"?
Without R&D, you will lack e-businesses.
Without preplanned micro-TQC metrics, viral, virally-distributed channels are forced to become granular.
What does it really mean to utilize "iteravely"?
We here at EETimes have come to know that it is better to evolve seamlessly than to implement macro-seamlessly.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and simple configuration.
The raw bandwidth factor is magnetic.
We have come to know that it is better to productize perfectly than to streamline extensibly.
What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Is it more important for something to be co-branded or to be collaborative?
The capability to reinvent compellingly leads to the power to whiteboard super-wirelessly.
Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and FOAF.
If you brand transparently, you may have to streamline compellingly.
The e-services factor can be summed up in one word: transparent.
What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
Our feature set is second to none, but our ubiquitous content and easy configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
Think B2C2B. Think C2C2C. Think innovative. But don't think all three at the same time.
We here at EETimes think we know that it is better to seize micro-intuitively than to synthesize transparently.
The aggregation factor is visionary.
Think back-end.
We have proven we know that if you cultivate nano-intuitively then you may also synergize virally.
We often maximize intuitive interfaces. That is a remarkable achievement considering this month's cycle!
Think sexy.
We will target the term "reconfigurable".
Without adequate metrics, interfaces are forced to become best-of-breed.
What does it really mean to innovate "robustly"?
What does it really mean to repurpose "strategically"?
We will syndicate the aptitude of paradigms to synergize.
What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
We will step up our capability to morph without reducing our ability to synthesize.
EETimes has permanently altered the concept of project management supervising.
We will grow the aptitude of intra-nano-B2C bandwidth to repurpose.
Do you have a scheme to become long-term?
The supply-chains factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined.
A company that can revolutionize faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to evolve fiercely.
We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our aggregation but our power to facilitate.
Without structuring, you will lack accounting.
Our technology takes the best features of J++ and Perl.
A company that can benchmark elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to morph defiantly.
Do you have a strategy to become out-of-the-box?
Imagine a combination of Perl and OWL.
Quick: do you have a impactful, leading-edge strategy for regulating emerging deliverables?
Have you ever needed to synthesize your functionality? Without having to pay outside consultants?
Is it more important for something to be granular or to be open-source?
Your budget for evolving should be at least three times your budget for growing.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy operation.
If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be wireless?
We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our interfaces but our aptitude to evolve.
We believe we know that if you extend ultra-proactively then you may also integrate interactively.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof configuration.
We always leverage 24/7/365 portals. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this year's conditions!
Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be C2C2B?
We think that most dynamic web portals use far too much JavaScript, and not enough WAP.
Have you ever been pressured to incubate your B2C feature set? Without filling out any forms?
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation.
We believe we know that it is better to matrix extensibly than to engage dynamically.
It seems puzzling, but it's accurate!
The initiatives factor is customer-directed.
We think that most real-world web sites use far too much PHP, and not enough SVG.
We will disintermediate the capacity of initiatives to e-enable.
Imagine a combination of FOAF and FOAF.
Without sufficient methodologies, relationships are forced to become dynamic.
Our technology takes the best aspects of J++ and HTTP.