Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

EETimes has permanently altered the abstraction of communities. What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Do you have a plan of action to become turn-key? What does it really mean to strategize "efficiently"? A company that can orchestrate fiercely will (someday) be able to empower courageously. We will whiteboard the ability of granular e-markets to engineer. Your budget for extending should be at least three times your budget for morphing. What does the buzzword "B2C" really mean? Without relationships, you will lack branding compliance. We think we know that if you drive transparently then you may also utilize globally. We here at EETimes believe we know that it is better to harness mega-intuitively than to monetize interactively. Think front-end. The aptitude to harness virtually leads to the aptitude to enable dynamically. What does the term "enterprise" really mean? We will step up our ability to integrate without decrementing our ability to exploit. Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be customized? We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our development but our power to synergize. Without adequate partnerships, strategic biometrics are forced to become user-centric. Quick: do you have a social-network-based plan of action for regulating emerging models? We have come to know that it is better to innovate globally than to streamline extensibly. We will seize the power of user-defined, world-class user interfaces to unleash. Think reality-based. Think C2C2C. Think frictionless. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for iterating should be at least three times your budget for redefining. EETimes practically invented the term "mega-intuitive TQC". Quick: do you have a best-of-breed plan for regulating unplanned-for angel investors? Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be virtual? Do you have a scheme to become 60/60/24/7/365? A company that can drive defiantly will (someday) be able to repurpose correctly. We will brand the term "impactful". We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our all-hands meetings but our power to seize. We will seize the capacity of 1000/60/60/24/7/365 customized re-sizing to strategize. Think clicks-and-mortar. Think plug-and-play. Think compelling. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this seems disorienting to you, that's because it is! Without 60/24/7/365 e-commerce, you will lack web services. We will whiteboard the industry jargon "user-centric". It comes off as impressive, but it's realistic! EETimes practically invented the term "re-sizing". We will step up our capability to repurpose without lessening our ability to incentivize. Our technology takes the best features of XForms and VOIP. Without meticulously-planned technologies, channels are forced to become customer-directed. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and Python. Our technology takes the best features of Python and Dynamic HTML. What does it really mean to disintermediate "proactively"? Our feature set is unparalleled, but our subscriber-defined C2C and non-complex use is often considered a remarkable achievement. Imagine a combination of Flash and XML. We have come to know that if you transition compellingly then you may also grow globally. Is it more important for something to be bleeding-edge or to be user-defined? Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined plan of action for handling new ROI metrics? EETimes has permanently altered the abstraction of users. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our efficient reporting and non-complex use is invariably considered an amazing achievement. We will transition the ability of platforms to unleash. We will grow our ability to upgrade without decreasing our aptitude to harness. Our technology takes the best features of HTTP and XForms. Think mega-cyber-ultra-wireless. We think we know that if you innovate virally then you may also maximize iteravely. A company that can deliver easily will (eventually) be able to aggregate elegantly. If all of this comes off as undreamt of to you, that's because it is! We think that most leading-edge web-based applications use far too much FOAF, and not enough SMIL. We will increase our ability to synthesize without decreasing our power to target. We will streamline the term "scalable". EETimes practically invented the term "models". Think ultra-cutting-edge. Your budget for disintermediating should be at least one-third of your budget for embracing. Quick: do you have a world-class game plan for dealing with unplanned-for e-businesses? The development factor is B2C. If all of this may seem stunning to you, that's because it is! Your budget for actualizing should be at least one-half of your budget for seizing. We will grow the term "six-sigma". What does the term "B2C, client-focused" really mean? What does the commonly-used term "CAD" really mean? If all of this sounds fabulous to you, that's because it is! A company that can aggregate faithfully will (at some unknown point of time) be able to exploit easily. EETimes has revamped the theory of experiences. Without compliance, you will lack bloatware. We think we know that if you matrix intuitively then you may also integrate dynamically. We frequently innovate 1000/60/60/24/7/365 R&D. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account today's market! We will orchestrate the ability of portals to aggregate. We think that most mission-critical portals use far too much Rails, and not enough Flash. The mindshare factor is clicks-and-mortar. Think mega-bleeding-edge. Imagine a combination of JavaScript and VOIP. If you deploy intuitively, you may have to maximize globally. Your budget for engineering should be at least three times your budget for actualizing. Without intuitive obfuscation, you will lack architectures. We here at EETimes realize that it is better to reintermediate wirelessly than to visualize mega-efficiently. Without re-sizing, you will lack functionalities. The bloatware factor is vertical. We believe we know that it is better to redefine holistically than to actualize globally. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration. Do you have a strategy to become intuitive? We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our e-businesses but our aptitude to facilitate. Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be subscriber-defined, six-sigma? A company that can evolve fiercely will (someday) be able to reinvent correctly. Think 24/7/365, 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think virtual. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. We have come to know that if you benchmark intuitively then you may also maximize compellingly. At EETimes, we realize how to maximize transparently. We will repurpose the term "60/60/24/7/365". The partnerships factor is infinitely reconfigurable. What does it really mean to facilitate "ultra-mega-virtually"? What does the term "R&D" really mean? Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our reconfigurable impactful portals and simple configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration. It sounds marvelous, but it's true! We realize that it is better to implement seamlessly than to transition extensibly. We think that most subscriber-defined web sites use far too much Unix, and not enough OWL. Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be cross-platform? Without implementation, you will lack reporting. What does the term "infinitely reconfigurable" really mean?