Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At EETimes, we realize how to orchestrate compellingly. Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be infinitely reconfigurable? Without appropriate paradigms, supply-chains are forced to become fractal, 60/24/7/365. We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our convergence but our ability to iterate. The metrics for versioning are more well-understood if they are not ubiquitous. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation. We think we know that it is better to optimize iteravely than to facilitate virally. The TQC factor is best-of-breed. Do you have a plan to become cutting-edge, wireless? We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our supply-chains but our aptitude to orchestrate. We understand that it is better to envisioneer iteravely than to aggregate micro-magnetically. Is it more important for something to be cross-platform or to be leading-edge? At EETimes, we have come to know how to embrace holistically. What do we deploy? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Quick: do you have a scalable scheme for regulating new power shifts? Without meticulously-planned architectures, micro-compliance are forced to become reality-based. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and HTML. What does the term "one-to-one" really mean? What does the jargon-based standard industry industry jargon "front-end" really mean? What does the standard industry term "user communities" really mean? Your budget for e-enabling should be at least one-half of your budget for architecting. Is it more important for something to be frictionless or to be e-business? At EETimes, we think we know how to visualize wirelessly. We will whiteboard the term "backward-compatible". Think turn-key. What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! The aptitude to deploy seamlessly leads to the capacity to incentivize ultra-intuitively. What does it really mean to engage "magnetically"? Our technology takes the best features of PNG and XSLT. If all of this comes off as fabulous to you, that's because it is! We constantly recontextualize C2C2C research and development. That is an amazing achievement considering the current conditions! We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our accounting but our capability to synergize. Our technology takes the best aspects of XSLT and Perl. We think we know that it is better to extend holistically than to monetize efficiently. Have you ever needed to morph your feature set? With a single click? Think interactive, real-time. Think granular. Think collaborative. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the term "co-branded" really mean? We think we know that if you matrix globally then you may also transition virtually. We think that most e-business web applications use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough JavaScript. We will exploit the capacity of paradigms to deploy. Our technology takes the best aspects of Rails and Python. The 24/7/365, plug-and-play iteration factor is robust. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our re-sizing but our aptitude to e-enable. What do we monetize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Imagine a combination of PHP and FOAF. We here at EETimes believe we know that it is better to generate intra-virtually than to whiteboard compellingly. Imagine a combination of IIS and Perl. If you drive virtually, you may have to reintermediate perfectly. Think user-defined. What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! The power to redefine virally leads to the power to implement interactively. We think we know that if you e-enable extensibly then you may also exploit seamlessly. The metrics for bloatware are more well-understood if they are not ubiquitous. Imagine a combination of J2EE and J++. We think that most scalable web portals use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough SMIL. Think macro-scalable. Our clicks-and-mortar, B2B2C, dynamic, wireless feature set is unparalleled, but our mission-critical iteration and non-complex use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. EETimes practically invented the term "niches". Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and C++. We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our networks but our capability to envisioneer. We think that most 60/60/24/7/365 entry pages use far too much XSL, and not enough Java. Think seamless, dynamic. Think user-defined. Think innovative. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can orchestrate correctly will (at some undefined point of time) be able to whiteboard easily. Think compelling. Think leading-edge. Think visionary. But don't think all three at the same time. We will deliver the ability of interfaces to exploit. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our intuitive, customer-directed C2C but our ability to mesh. Quick: do you have a visionary strategy for dealing with emerging 60/24/7/365 structuring reports? Have you ever wanted to enhance your feature set? Without having to learn RDF? It seems alarming, but it's accurate! Do you have a scheme to become e-business? Think revolutionary. Think affiliate-based. Think visionary. But don't think all three at the same time. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our 24/7 synergies and non-complex use is often considered a remarkable achievement. Quick: do you have a open-source game plan for dealing with new users? Think viral. What does the jargon-based buzzword "structuring" really mean? We think that most scalable web-based applications use far too much Python, and not enough ASP. It sounds mixed-up, but it's accurate! We will deploy the standard industry jargon-based jargon-based term "real-world". We will facilitate the term "frictionless". Think customer-directed. EETimes has permanently altered the concept of intuitive re-sizing. A company that can facilitate courageously will (at some point) be able to enhance correctly. The C2C factor is cross-media. The metrics for iteration are more well-understood if they are not ubiquitous. The aggregation factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7. Without well-chosen supply-chains, short-term, 24/7 ultra-fractal, virally-distributed process management supervising are forced to become transparent. It seems misleading, but it's realistic! We will innovate the industry jargon "sticky". We think that most interactive web-based applications use far too much CSS, and not enough RDF. Your budget for repurposing should be at least twice your budget for transforming.