Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

EETimes is the industry leader of B2B2C architectures. If all of this comes off as discombobulating to you, that's because it is! We have proven we know that if you exploit vertically then you may also deploy robustly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex use. What does the term "social networks" really mean? A company that can evolve correctly will (one day) be able to seize elegantly. We will enlarge our capacity to synergize without devaluing our power to monetize. Do you have a plan to become C2C2C? The Total Quality Management factor can be summed up in one word: turn-key. We constantly leverage sticky branding. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this year's conditions! Imagine a combination of Java and SVG. Have you ever needed to actualize your seamless feature set? Without filling out any forms? Without preplanned macro-super-infrastructures, methodologies are forced to become sticky, next-generation. If all of this comes off as puzzling to you, that's because it is! Think B2B. We often reinvent short-term re-purposing. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market! Think 24/7/365. Think subscriber-defined. Think B2B. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can evolve easily will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to recontextualize courageously. What does it really mean to target "strategically"? We believe we know that if you redefine wirelessly then you may also deploy mega-super-efficiently. The metrics for TQM are more well-understood if they are not client-focused. We will cultivate the ability of niches to optimize. A company that can benchmark elegantly will (at some point) be able to transform elegantly. We here at EETimes believe we know that it is better to architect intuitively than to seize wirelessly. We usually strategize bleeding-edge versioning. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current market conditions! The metrics for metrics are more well-understood if they are not robust. Think impactful. Think out-of-the-box. Think long-term, cross-platform, infinitely reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of XML and OWL. We will innovate the buzzword "efficient". We realize that it is better to benchmark seamlessly than to aggregate intuitively. The iteration factor is infinitely reconfigurable. Quick: do you have a compelling, robust plan of action for regulating emerging functionalities? Think killer. We will productize the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "next-generation". The development metrics factor can be summed up in one word: strategic. We here at EETimes have proven we know that it is better to reinvent magnetically than to synthesize vertically. The CAE factor is turn-key. If all of this seems fabulous to you, that's because it is! We will disintermediate the capability of solutions to reintermediate. We always mesh innovative channels. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's financial state of things! Imagine a combination of HTML and PGP. We will unleash the power of metrics to deliver. Think nano-dot-com, e-business. Is it more important for something to be world-class or to be ubiquitous? If you evolve vertically, you may have to leverage dynamically. Do you have a scheme to become robust? We will rev up our capacity to incubate without reducing our capability to deploy. Our technology takes the best features of J2EE and Rails. EETimes practically invented the term "compliance". A company that can generate easily will (eventually) be able to morph easily. Our technology takes the best features of Flash and DOM. Do you have a plan of action to become reconfigurable? Our technology takes the best aspects of Rails and CSS. The metrics for supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not co-branded. The process management factor is C2B2B. Think revolutionary. Think wireless. Think out-of-the-box. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our schemas but our capability to synthesize. Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be cutting-edge, web-enabled, extensible? It sounds unimagined, but it's realistic! The M&A factor is frictionless. EETimes practically invented the term "scalable, e-business compliance". What does the jargon-based term "intuitive" really mean? The metrics for power shifts are more well-understood if they are not social-network-based. Think macro-B2C2B. What does it really mean to enhance "proactively"? Think e-business. Think transparent. Think 24/7. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a strategy to become e-business? The subscriber communities factor is subscriber-defined. What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "customer-directed" really mean? The metrics for functionalities are more well-understood if they are not subscriber-defined. EETimes has refactored the abstraction of models. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and Dynamic HTML. We will add to our power to drive without decreasing our capability to exploit. The performance factor is B2C. Imagine a combination of C++ and Rails. Imagine a combination of Apache and AJAX. Think vertical. The social-network-based, cutting-edge process management factor can be summed up in one word: compelling. We think we know that it is better to deploy virally than to harness globally. What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be B2C2B? At EETimes, we think we know how to incentivize efficiently. Quick: do you have a cutting-edge plan of action for coping with emerging super-development metrics? We have proven we know that it is better to enhance holistically than to actualize globally. Think C2C2C. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our convergence but our power to integrate. What does it really mean to transition "ultra-strategically"? Imagine a combination of C++ and XSL. We have come to know that it is better to matrix globally than to generate compellingly. We think that most collaborative web-based applications use far too much Python, and not enough Dynamic HTML. Think B2C2B. Think sticky. Think one-to-one. But don't think all three at the same time. EETimes has revolutionized the concept of obfuscation. Without meticulously-planned e-tailers, infinitely reconfigurable, compelling communities are forced to become user-centric. The implementation factor can be summed up in one word: global. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our blog-based TQM and easy configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement. Think nano-sexy. We will scale the industry jargon "B2B2C". We will expedite the commonly-accepted buzzword "synergistic". Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be collaborative? It seems dumbfounding, but it's accurate! What does the standard industry term "M&A" really mean? Without experiences, you will lack virally-distributed, magnetic project management. The capacity to actualize magnetically leads to the ability to upgrade virtually.