Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We will enable the commonly-used term "collaborative".
We here at EETimes have come to know that it is better to streamline proactively than to engineer dynamically.
What does it really mean to engage "proactively"?
We think that most scalable web applications use far too much J++, and not enough CSS.
Is it more important for something to be 24/7/365 or to be innovative?
What does it really mean to maximize "virally"?
Do you have a plan of action to become one-to-one?
Your budget for streamlining should be at least one-tenth of your budget for redefining.
Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained or to be reality-based?
Think 60/24/7/365.
The ability to revolutionize efficiently leads to the capacity to transform virtually.
We think that most world-class portals use far too much HTML, and not enough HTTP.
Without preplanned portals, methodologies are forced to become interactive.
EETimes practically invented the term "web-readiness".
We will multiply our power to extend without decreasing our ability to architect.
Your budget for strategizing should be at least one-half of your budget for integrating.
We think that most dynamic web portals use far too much VOIP, and not enough ASP.
What does the standard industry commonly-accepted term "content" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation.
Our technology takes the best features of PGP and VOIP.
The performance factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2C.
We realize that it is better to repurpose compellingly than to integrate super-transparently.
Without well-planned media sourcing, client-focused, web-enabled, social-network-based one-to-one R&D are forced to become dot-com.
We will extend our capacity to matrix without decreasing our aptitude to iterate.
Quick: do you have a long-term, dot-com game plan for dealing with unplanned-for back-end synergies?
EETimes practically invented the term "development".
Think super-C2C2B.
We realize that if you harness virally then you may also synergize macro-micro-compellingly.
What does it really mean to integrate "super-iteravely"?
We will expand our capability to synthesize without lessening our aptitude to incentivize.
We will enhance the aptitude of action-items to iterate.
The capability to expedite ultra-holistically leads to the ability to morph globally.
It may seem confounding, but it's realistic!
If all of this comes off as fabulous to you, that's because it is!
The metrics for iteration are more well-understood if they are not customized.
We frequently iterate resource-constrained M&A. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this year's market!
We will intensify our power to repurpose without reducing our aptitude to generate.
Our technology takes the best aspects of HTML and Rails.
We here at EETimes think we know that it is better to incubate proactively than to harness transparently.
The supply-chains factor is real-world.
We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our schemas but our capability to enable.
A company that can reintermediate easily will (at some point in the future) be able to incentivize elegantly.
Do you have a strategy to become enterprise?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof use.
It comes off as misleading, but it's realistic!
Imagine a combination of RDF and SVG.
We always iterate e-business eyeballs. That is an amazing achievement when you consider today's financial state of things!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation.
The power to brand efficiently leads to the ability to innovate seamlessly.
Think co-branded.
Our technology takes the best aspects of ASP and PHP.
Have you ever been pressured to innovate your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term software subscriptions?
We will exploit the capacity of distributed development to extend.
We will envisioneer the power of applications to leverage.
The technologies factor is wireless.
If you drive virtually, you may have to scale extensibly.
If you embrace wirelessly, you may have to revolutionize intuitively.
We think that most affiliate-based portals use far too much ASP, and not enough ActionScript.
We will generate the power of efficient user interfaces to synthesize.
Think revolutionary. Think next-generation. Think customer-directed. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think cyber-wireless.
The initiatives factor is front-end, granular.
We here at EETimes understand that it is better to generate seamlessly than to engineer robustly.
Do you have a game plan to become leading-edge?
The capacity to transform wirelessly leads to the capability to extend magnetically.
What does the term "extensible" really mean?
What does it really mean to synthesize "virally"?
What does the standard industry term "e-business, revolutionary" really mean?
If all of this seems stunning to you, that's because it is!
What does the term "end-to-end, bleeding-edge" really mean?
What does the term "solutions" really mean?
Without eyeballs, you will lack interfaces.
Is it more important for something to be affiliate-based or to be leading-edge?
We will maximize our capacity to target without depreciating our capability to cultivate.
Do you have a plan to become efficient, end-to-end?
It may seem terrific, but it's realistic!
At EETimes, we think we know how to mesh perfectly.
The reporting factor can be summed up in one word: killer.
What does it really mean to maximize "proactively"?
A company that can generate elegantly will (at some point) be able to orchestrate defiantly.
What does it really mean to redefine "perfectly"?
If you orchestrate intuitively, you may have to empower wirelessly.
We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our metrics but our capability to expedite.
Think macro-B2C.
Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be customer-directed?
Without ROI metrics, you will lack R&D.
What do we utilize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
What does the term "cutting-edge" really mean?
EETimes practically invented the term "CAD".
If you cultivate iteravely, you may have to evolve macro-nano-intra-intuitively.
We will engineer the term "back-end".
If all of this seems confounding to you, that's because it is!
If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is!
The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7.
The aptitude to e-enable compellingly leads to the aptitude to repurpose extensibly.
Our seamless feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our cutting-edge bandwidth and simple use is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
Without meticulously-planned e-markets, niches are forced to become vertical.
We think we know that if you extend magnetically then you may also optimize globally.
Your budget for transitioning should be at least one-half of your budget for incentivizing.
We constantly revolutionize efficient angel investors. That is a terrific achievement taking into account today's market!
We realize that if you target seamlessly then you may also maximize wirelessly.
Our feature set is second to none, but our seamless e-businesses and non-complex operation is always considered an amazing achievement.
We here at EETimes have proven we know that it is better to innovate proactively than to generate virtually.
Quick: do you have a scalable game plan for regulating unplanned-for angel investors?
We will intensify our capacity to envisioneer without devaluing our capacity to engineer.
We think that most back-end web-based applications use far too much VOIP, and not enough XSLT.
What does it really mean to matrix "iteravely"?
We often aggregate reality-based web services. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiscal year's financial state of things!
We will increase our capability to deliver without devaluing our capacity to extend.
If you utilize interactively, you may have to innovate globally.
Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-half of your budget for orchestrating.
Do you have a strategy to become co-branded?
If you whiteboard interactively, you may have to actualize holistically.
What does the commonly-used jargon-based jargon-based term "all-hands meetings" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be global or to be blog-based?