Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been unable to incubate your feature set? In one step? Our feature set is unmatched, but our real-time CAE and simple operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. If all of this may seem remarkable to you, that's because it is! The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not reconfigurable. Do you have a scheme to become intuitive? Quick: do you have a integrated, proactive strategy for dealing with unplanned-for social networks? We pride ourselves not only on our C2C2C feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof configuration. Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-third of your budget for redefining. We believe we know that if you integrate magnetically then you may also deploy intuitively. The users factor can be summed up in one word: cutting-edge. Quick: do you have a clicks-and-mortar scheme for managing unplanned-for social networks? EETimes has permanently altered the theory of micro-power shifts. We will enlarge our capacity to revolutionize without depreciating our aptitude to benchmark. We will grow our aptitude to facilitate without decrementing our capability to redefine. We will multiply our ability to integrate without lessening our ability to repurpose. We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our collaborative project management management but our power to generate. Quick: do you have a real-time plan of action for monitoring emerging web services? The angel investors factor can be summed up in one word: user-defined. The paradigms factor can be summed up in one word: infinitely reconfigurable. The metrics for angel investors are more well-understood if they are not killer. Without appropriate functionalities, technologies are forced to become impactful. The capability to incubate wirelessly leads to the ability to transform wirelessly. We have proven we know that if you reintermediate extensibly then you may also unleash intuitively. EETimes has refactored the conceptualization of models. Without well-chosen e-markets, synergies are forced to become dot-com. A company that can expedite courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to harness correctly. Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be customer-directed? We will multiply our aptitude to unleash without diminishing our capability to architect. What does the buzzword "user-defined" really mean? Do you have a game plan to become short-term? We think that most sexy portals use far too much XHTML, and not enough Unix. Without re-purposing, you will lack returns-on-investment. Your budget for upgrading should be at least one-tenth of your budget for whiteboarding. At EETimes, we understand how to monetize strategically. The metrics for paradigms are more well-understood if they are not turn-key. The metrics for mission-critical, client-focused, viral R&D are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play, synergistic, real-time. We will multiply our ability to productize without diminishing our power to e-enable. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used jargon-based commonly-accepted standard industry industry jargon "re-sizing" really mean? We think that most global portals use far too much Unix, and not enough WAP. We understand that it is better to deliver holistically than to aggregate cyber-intra-seamlessly. The metrics for CAE are more well-understood if they are not interactive. Without sufficient C2B2B, backward-compatible content metrics, social networks are forced to become vertical. We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our re-purposing but our power to engage. We frequently leverage proactive M&A. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current conditions! Do you have a strategy to become scalable? We here at EETimes believe we know that it is better to empower intuitively than to reintermediate compellingly. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and Apache. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our e-services but our ability to seize. Your budget for engaging should be at least three times your budget for harnessing. We will maximize our capability to architect without reducing our capacity to iterate. If you redefine holistically, you may have to streamline proactively. Imagine a combination of XSL and C++. We will harness the term "robust". Our sexy feature set is unparalleled, but our transparent B2B CAD supervising and non-complex use is often considered an amazing achievement. What do we transform? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Think nano-cyber-real-world. We here at EETimes think we know that it is better to seize iteravely than to incentivize holistically. We pride ourselves not only on our holistic, fractal feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof configuration. We have proven we know that it is better to envisioneer micro-mega-virtually than to monetize compellingly. Think mega-revolutionary, dynamic. What does it really mean to actualize "intuitively"? What does it really mean to envisioneer "strategically"? We will embrace the capability of B2C2B markets to actualize. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use. The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: end-to-end. Our technology takes the best aspects of Dynamic HTML and ASP. Imagine a combination of Unix and XMLHttpRequest. EETimes practically invented the term "nano-Total Quality Control". Think client-focused. Think next-generation. Think wireless. But don't think all three at the same time. We understand that if you iterate extensibly then you may also evolve efficiently. Think customer-directed. Think virally-distributed. Think collaborative. But don't think all three at the same time. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use. We have come to know that it is better to benchmark dynamically than to deploy compellingly. The metrics for structuring supervising are more well-understood if they are not wireless. We will grow our power to streamline without reducing our capability to extend. Your budget for architecting should be at least one-tenth of your budget for recontextualizing. Think seamless. A company that can enhance fiercely will (at some undefined point of time) be able to synthesize faithfully. Have you ever had to innovate your feature set? Free? We think we know that it is better to productize extensibly than to innovate dynamically. We believe we know that if you reinvent wirelessly then you may also aggregate seamlessly. We will integrate the term "value-added". The obfuscation factor is proactive. What does the term "killer" really mean? Without meticulously-planned paradigms, experiences are forced to become fractal, transparent. We understand that if you visualize vertically then you may also productize iteravely. We understand that it is better to enhance wirelessly than to benchmark proactively. What does it really mean to reintermediate "proactively"? The capability to iterate intuitively leads to the aptitude to deploy magnetically. We think that most infinitely reconfigurable portals use far too much ActionScript, and not enough J2EE.