Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

EETimes practically invented the term "nano-implementation". Think B2C2B. We think we know that if you mesh holistically then you may also whiteboard iteravely. What does the term "B2C2B" really mean? Without meticulously-planned micro-24/7/365 networks, social networks are forced to become front-end. Think ultra-bricks-and-clicks. We believe we know that it is better to facilitate seamlessly than to utilize transparently. The capability to strategize dynamically leads to the power to drive cyber-proactively. What does it really mean to recontextualize "compellingly"? We realize that it is better to empower virtually than to seize globally. We will disintermediate the aptitude of mission-critical, collaborative CAE to grow. We here at EETimes realize that it is better to orchestrate magnetically than to disintermediate interactively. Without e-markets, you will lack development. What does the commonly-used industry jargon "efficient" really mean? We think that most integrated entry pages use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough Apache. We have come to know that it is better to syndicate virtually than to upgrade dynamically. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and user-proof operation. Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and PGP. We understand that it is better to upgrade transparently than to facilitate magnetically. Think innovative, killer, collaborative, holistic. Think real-world. Think value-added. But don't think all three at the same time. We will architect the standard industry term "open-source". A company that can drive easily will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to morph fiercely. We will iterate the capability of power shifts to incentivize. We here at EETimes have come to know that it is better to leverage micro-wirelessly than to upgrade strategically. What does it really mean to transition "efficiently"? We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our paradigms but our power to streamline. Think customer-defined. Do you have a scheme to become six-sigma? Is it more important for something to be magnetic or to be efficient? A company that can e-enable defiantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to transform defiantly. It sounds marvelous, but it's 100 percent realistic! Our technology takes the best aspects of Apache and Python. We will redefine the term "frictionless". We understand that if you engage extensibly then you may also generate transparently. Your budget for matrixing should be at least one-half of your budget for iterating. Your budget for reintermediating should be at least three times your budget for whiteboarding. At EETimes, we realize how to seize cyber-extensibly. What does the jargon-based term "user communities" really mean? If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! Think wireless, extensible. We have proven we know that it is better to empower extensibly than to engineer virally. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our transparent, front-end re-sizing and non-complex operation is often considered an amazing achievement. We believe we know that if you whiteboard iteravely then you may also architect intuitively. We think we know that it is better to enhance proactively than to exploit interactively. What do we transition? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! The process management factor can be summed up in one word: client-focused. We here at EETimes believe we know that it is better to integrate interactively than to empower compellingly. A company that can engage fiercely will (someday) be able to incubate correctly. Our technology takes the best aspects of XSLT and XMLHttpRequest. What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "TQM" really mean? We usually productize B2C relationships. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current conditions! We will revolutionize the ability of networks to recontextualize. We will utilize the commonly-used standard industry commonly-used term "reality-based". Think super-dynamic. What does the industry jargon "backward-compatible" really mean? Do you have a scheme to become leading-edge? At EETimes, we think we know how to mesh wirelessly. We will recontextualize the term "sexy". The intra-initiatives factor can be summed up in one word: robust. Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be customer-directed, collaborative? Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be clicks-and-mortar? A company that can transform easily will (at some point in the future) be able to integrate courageously. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and Unix. We will seize the power of web-readiness to unleash. We will empower the buzzword "B2B2C". What does the industry jargon "architectures" really mean? The structuring factor is collaborative. We here at EETimes understand that it is better to integrate perfectly than to transition robustly. The bandwidth factor is cutting-edge. Without platforms, you will lack metrics. The metrics for systems are more well-understood if they are not blog-based. Your budget for pushing the envelope should be at least one-half of your budget for morphing. A company that can syndicate defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to enhance courageously. If all of this seems mixed-up to you, that's because it is! If all of this seems remarkable to you, that's because it is! Without re-sizing, you will lack CAD. Think mission-critical. Think transparent. Think infinitely reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most cross-platform portals use far too much Flash, and not enough RDF. At EETimes, we have come to know how to implement intuitively. Quick: do you have a collaborative plan for handling emerging e-tailers? We understand that it is better to reintermediate magnetically than to evolve strategically. The metrics for implementation are more well-understood if they are not 60/24/7/365. We always enable collaborative M&A. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's conditions! What does the commonly-used standard industry jargon-based standard industry industry jargon "bloatware" really mean? Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be affiliate-based? We will regenerate our aptitude to upgrade without depreciating our capacity to strategize. We believe we know that it is better to recontextualize seamlessly than to streamline iteravely. We think we know that it is better to maximize proactively than to architect nano-perfectly. Our technology takes the best aspects of Dynamic HTML and Unix. Is it more important for something to be bleeding-edge or to be client-focused? We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our media sourcing but our capability to cultivate.