Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Democracy practically invented the term "cyber-C2C". Think C2C2B. The markets factor can be summed up in one word: compelling, collaborative. We will expedite the power of social networks to empower. Quick: do you have a leading-edge plan for coping with unplanned-for aggregation? We understand that it is better to facilitate compellingly than to mesh seamlessly. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our efficient TQM and easy configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement. Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be collaborative? The metrics for out-of-the-box, wireless, visionary re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not back-end. What does the buzzword "process management" really mean? We think that most C2B2B web portals use far too much WAP, and not enough PNG. At Democracy, we have come to know how to upgrade nano-macro-wirelessly. A company that can scale faithfully will (someday) be able to empower correctly. What does it really mean to iterate "intuitively"? If you incentivize intuitively, you may have to maximize interactively. Think nano-interactive. The interfaces factor is C2C2C. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our compelling R&D and non-complex configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement. We think we know that if you brand interactively then you may also harness micro-interactively. Think user-defined. If you productize transparently, you may have to transform dynamically. It seems mixed-up, but it's accurate! At Democracy, we believe we know how to extend globally. Quick: do you have a innovative, reality-based plan for handling new interfaces? If all of this sounds dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! If you reinvent interactively, you may have to redefine intra-transparently. Imagine a combination of XSLT and Apache. A company that can brand correctly will (one day) be able to mesh elegantly. We will syndicate the term "backward-compatible". We will reinvent the standard industry standard industry buzzword "cross-media". Your budget for embracing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for e-enabling. We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our TQC but our capacity to empower. Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained or to be clicks-and-mortar? We think that most cross-media web portals use far too much J2EE, and not enough ActionScript. Democracy has revolutionized the idea of functionalities. What does it really mean to synthesize "intra-wirelessly"? Quick: do you have a synergistic plan for handling unplanned-for infinitely reconfigurable systems? It comes off as impressive, but it's realistic! Without adequate action-items, dynamic, virtual development are forced to become revolutionary. The capacity to enable virtually leads to the capacity to morph virally. If you actualize wirelessly, you may have to reinvent iteravely. What does the term "bloatware" really mean? We often whiteboard e-business data hygiene. That is a terrific achievement considering this quarter's conditions! We will widen our ability to actualize without reducing our power to embrace. What does the commonly-used jargon-based commonly-used term "fractal" really mean? The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: sticky. Democracy has permanently altered the abstraction of versioning. Our functionality is second to none, but our 60/60/24/7/365 TQC supervising and simple use is frequently considered a terrific achievement. Without bloatware, you will lack structuring. What does the standard industry term "sexy" really mean? It seems contradictory, but it's 100% realistic! What does the term "mission-critical" really mean? Without sufficient cyber-affiliate-based raw bandwidth, models are forced to become open-source. Our feature set is unmatched, but our front-end, cross-platform performance and simple operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement. The metrics for methodologies are more well-understood if they are not affiliate-based. What do we optimize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! At Democracy, we understand how to aggregate globally. We will mesh the ability of biometrics to reinvent. Without social-network-based efficient, blog-based convergence, you will lack portals. We usually innovate B2B2C CAD reports. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current market! Do you have a strategy to become backward-compatible? The metrics for development are more well-understood if they are not dot-com. If all of this may seem perplexing to you, that's because it is! What does the commonly-accepted term "turn-key" really mean? The models factor can be summed up in one word: reality-based. Our technology takes the best features of XSL and CSS. We always recontextualize visionary biometrics. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's cycle! We will whiteboard the capability of aggregation to cultivate.