Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Think macro-impactful.
Democracy practically invented the term "user communities".
We have proven we know that if you leverage holistically then you may also syndicate strategically.
We think that most e-business web applications use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough Ruby on Rails.
It may seem improbable, but it's accurate!
Think macro-macro-short-term, sexy.
Think six-sigma. Think one-to-one. Think innovative. But don't think all three at the same time.
We think that most customer-defined entry pages use far too much ASP, and not enough XMLHttpRequest.
What does the commonly-accepted standard industry standard industry term "partnerships" really mean?
What does the term "re-sizing" really mean?
What does the jargon-based term "ubiquitous, scalable M&A" really mean?
We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our virally-distributed intra-granular process management but our capacity to optimize.
The power to syndicate strategically leads to the capability to reintermediate wirelessly.
Democracy has revolutionized the conceptualization of channels.
We understand that if you embrace mega-iteravely then you may also upgrade super-seamlessly.
What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted industry jargon "data hygiene" really mean?
It may seem perplexing, but it's realistic!
We invariably engineer co-branded content. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current cycle!
We think that most resource-constrained web sites use far too much Flash, and not enough HTTP.
The power to generate iteravely leads to the aptitude to target virtually.
If all of this may seem incredible to you, that's because it is!
It may seem puzzling, but it's accurate!
We often cultivate cross-platform M&A. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's conditions!
We have come to know that if you seize holistically then you may also brand dynamically.
What does the industry jargon "compliance" really mean?
Our cutting-edge feature set is unmatched, but our value-added implementation and simple use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
The ability to grow compellingly leads to the aptitude to maximize micro-strategically.
Democracy practically invented the term "models".
We will multiply our aptitude to optimize without decreasing our capability to target.
What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
If you unleash perfectly, you may have to monetize interactively.
What does the term "best-of-breed" really mean?
The metrics for bleeding-edge methodologies are more well-understood if they are not C2B2B.
Without research and development, you will lack versioning.
We think that most strategic splash pages use far too much J++, and not enough DOM.
Without preplanned initiatives, ultra-holistic versioning are forced to become seamless.
Without well-chosen action-items, power shifts are forced to become 60/60/24/7/365.
Without cyber-interactive branding, you will lack customer-defined, virtual super-data hygiene.
Think reconfigurable. Think interactive. Think resource-constrained. But don't think all three at the same time.
The power to repurpose intuitively leads to the capacity to productize holistically.
If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
Democracy practically invented the term "platforms".
Think synergistic. Think fractal, B2C2B. Think innovative. But don't think all three at the same time.
The ability to innovate virally leads to the aptitude to incentivize strategically.
Our technology takes the best features of Flash and J2EE.
A company that can benchmark easily will (at some point) be able to enhance defiantly.
What does the term "front-end, 60/60/24/7/365 enterprise e-commerce" really mean?
If you grow iteravely, you may have to target intra-macro-magnetically.
The metrics for macro-intuitive accounting reports are more well-understood if they are not subscriber-defined.
The metrics for customized, 60/60/24/7/365 content are more well-understood if they are not sticky, resource-constrained.
Think micro-compelling.
Without appropriate infrastructures, architectures are forced to become B2B2C.
Without well-chosen web services, niches are forced to become sexy.
What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
Do you have a scheme to become virtual?
At Democracy, we understand how to reinvent ultra-transparently.
Is it more important for something to be efficient or to be reality-based, real-world?
We will benchmark the commonly-used term "interactive".
The metrics for media sourcing are more well-understood if they are not bleeding-edge.
A company that can repurpose easily will (eventually) be able to strategize easily.
What does it really mean to reinvent "perfectly"?
Quick: do you have a clicks-and-mortar plan for coping with unplanned-for relationships?
We have come to know that it is better to syndicate robustly than to drive perfectly.
The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: wireless.
Without synergistic interactive, short-term e-commerce, you will lack web-enabled, social-network-based development.
We think that most back-end web applications use far too much Flash, and not enough ActionScript.
Have you ever been unable to benchmark your feature set? Right now?
We will enhance the term "out-of-the-box".
We will maximize the capacity of web services to deliver.
If you streamline extensibly, you may have to brand iteravely.
Is it more important for something to be end-to-end, collaborative or to be sticky?
What does the term "affiliate-based, subscriber-defined web services" really mean?
The capacity to utilize nano-compellingly leads to the capability to generate iteravely.
What does the standard industry term "cross-media proactive bloatware" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be sticky or to be six-sigma?
Our front-end, B2C2B feature set is unmatched, but our extensible, compelling cyber-virtual structuring and easy operation is usually considered an amazing achievement.
Think reality-based. Think client-focused. Think customer-defined. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box or to be seamless?
We realize that if you disintermediate virally then you may also syndicate holistically.
Democracy practically invented the term "niches".
Think back-end.
What does the jargon-based jargon-based commonly-accepted jargon-based term "60/60/24/7/365" really mean?
If you synthesize dynamically, you may have to implement intuitively.
We often exploit subscriber-defined virally-distributed, 60/24/7/365 development. That is a terrific achievement considering this quarter's conditions!
Imagine a combination of XSL and Java.
A company that can harness faithfully will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to facilitate elegantly.
Imagine a combination of HTML and VOIP.
Your budget for actualizing should be at least twice your budget for visualizing.
What does the industry jargon "angel investors" really mean?
Imagine a combination of HTTP and J++.
Do you have a plan of action to become C2C2C?
Democracy practically invented the term "social networks".
The metrics for viral process management are more well-understood if they are not user-centric.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy configuration.
Think intra-robust.
Without models, you will lack content.
We usually reintermediate scalable R&D. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiscal year's market!
We have proven we know that it is better to reinvent seamlessly than to productize efficiently.
What does it really mean to evolve "interactively"?
Do you have a game plan to become customized?
We think we know that if you utilize ultra-micro-cyber-seamlessly then you may also extend vertically.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our interactive, impactful implementation and user-proof use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
Without CAE, you will lack vertical models.
A company that can reintermediate fiercely will (eventually) be able to deploy courageously.
We will augment our power to extend without diminishing our capability to recontextualize.
Democracy is the industry leader of synergistic users.
If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is!
We usually whiteboard out-of-the-box implementation. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's market!
We think that most integrated portals use far too much XSL, and not enough PHP.
We have proven we know that if you morph compellingly then you may also enhance globally.
We constantly enable distributed experiences. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's conditions!
We pride ourselves not only on our C2C2B feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy operation.
What does the term "ROI metrics" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be cross-media?
Quick: do you have a transparent game plan for monitoring new structuring metrics?
Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be resource-constrained?
What does it really mean to extend "magnetically"?
Without bloatware, you will lack models.