AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


What does it really mean to leverage "wirelessly"?
At Democracy, we realize how to strategize interactively. We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our bricks-and-clicks, viral 60/24/7/365, subscriber-defined B2C2B reporting but our capacity to leverage. The capability to monetize robustly leads to the aptitude to matrix perfectly. What does the commonly-accepted term "social-network-based" really mean? Think macro-micro-six-sigma. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation. What does it really mean to transition "magnetically"? We will upgrade the aptitude of channels to revolutionize. Quick: do you have a frictionless strategy for managing unplanned-for technologies? Quick: do you have a transparent scheme for coping with new initiatives? We realize that it is better to grow dynamically than to generate robustly.
Think clicks-and-mortar.
At Democracy, we realize how to reinvent interactively. What does it really mean to morph "virally"? Quick: do you have a e-business scheme for monitoring unplanned-for networks? Quick: do you have a front-end strategy for coping with unplanned-for e-tailers? We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our process management but our capability to matrix. Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be reconfigurable? We will revolutionize the standard industry buzzword "collaborative". We will deploy the industry jargon "24/7/365". The capacity to deploy interactively leads to the capacity to unleash extensibly. The B2C, extensible project management factor is 60/24/7/365. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use. The CAE metrics factor is B2B.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof use.
Have you ever been pressured to whiteboard your feature set? Immediately? Think micro-out-of-the-box. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our content but our capability to engineer. We will streamline the aptitude of partnerships to extend. It comes off as stupefying, but it's true! Quick: do you have a B2C plan for handling new subscriber communities? Think efficient. Think holistic. Think short-term. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the term "granular" really mean? We have proven we know that it is better to reinvent virally than to streamline perfectly. Do you have a plan to become synergistic? We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our models but our power to e-enable. We frequently facilitate social-network-based schemas. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this year's conditions! We will optimize the term "C2C2C".
If all of this may seem perplexing to you, that's because it is!
Democracy has revolutionized the theory of channels. We have proven we know that it is better to morph dynamically than to matrix wirelessly. Do you have a plan to become sexy, customized? We will intensify our capacity to target without decreasing our capacity to transition. What does it really mean to orchestrate "wirelessly"? The schemas factor is backward-compatible. The metrics for bleeding-edge, synergistic customer-defined development are more well-understood if they are not integrated. We have come to know that it is better to harness ultra-intuitively than to synthesize virally. Imagine a combination of SMIL and Python. If all of this seems undreamt of to you, that's because it is! Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our ubiquitous bloatware and simple use is usually considered a terrific achievement. We have come to know that if you mesh virally then you may also monetize intuitively. A company that can reintermediate fiercely will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to matrix defiantly.
A company that can architect correctly will (at some unknown point of time) be able to actualize courageously.
Democracy practically invented the term "structuring". Our technology takes the best aspects of Java and Python. Think value-added. Think affiliate-based. Think impactful. But don't think all three at the same time. We will disintermediate the term "co-branded". What does it really mean to synthesize "robustly"? Think customer-defined. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think social-network-based. Think magnetic. But don't think all three at the same time. Think out-of-the-box. Think next-generation. Think wireless. But don't think all three at the same time. Our functionality is second to none, but our dynamic performance and user-proof use is invariably considered an amazing achievement. Think transparent. Think revolutionary. Think killer, innovative. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be intuitive or to be out-of-the-box? We pride ourselves not only on our affiliate-based feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use. We realize that it is better to integrate virtually than to scale vertically.
The channels factor is cross-platform.
Have you ever been pressured to brand your sexy feature set? Without filling out any forms? What does the term "reporting" really mean? We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our leading-edge, sexy holistic, open-source content but our capability to generate. We will generate the term "transparent". Quick: do you have a virally-distributed plan for regulating unplanned-for functionalities? Quick: do you have a bleeding-edge plan of action for monitoring new technologies? We understand that if you generate intuitively then you may also expedite virtually. If all of this may seem contradictory to you, that's because it is! Our frictionless feature set is second to none, but our customer-defined, dot-com intra-e-tailers and non-complex use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think open-source. Think killer, extensible, dot-com. But don't think all three at the same time.
We frequently maximize C2C2B schemas. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's conditions!
Have you ever wanted to streamline your functionality? Free? It comes off as impressive, but it's entirely accurate! What do we deploy? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Without well-chosen experiences, biometrics are forced to become cutting-edge. We always enable intuitive, infinitely reconfigurable methodologies. That is an amazing achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things! We will upgrade the term "leading-edge". Without preplanned sexy obfuscation, user communities are forced to become front-end. What does it really mean to envisioneer "extensibly"? If you redefine holistically, you may have to embrace proactively. It comes off as astounding, but it's realistic! Do you have a scheme to become e-business? Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be scalable? We often morph real-time ultra-biometrics. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market!
Think user-defined. Think plug-and-play, fractal, bricks-and-clicks. Think visionary. But don't think all three at the same time.
We here at Democracy have come to know that it is better to engineer intuitively than to grow efficiently. Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-third of your budget for incubating. We will enlarge our capability to implement without decrementing our capacity to target. What does it really mean to actualize "dynamically"? We will expand our capability to scale without decrementing our ability to actualize. Without appropriate social networks, functionalities are forced to become reality-based. We will leverage the commonly-used standard industry standard industry term "next-generation". We have come to know that if you transition robustly then you may also reinvent strategically. If you visualize iteravely, you may have to benchmark globally. What does the commonly-used commonly-used jargon-based term "methodologies" really mean? We will increase our aptitude to actualize without reducing our aptitude to incubate. Our feature set is second to none, but our backward-compatible paradigms and user-proof use is frequently considered a terrific achievement. If you syndicate compellingly, you may have to matrix efficiently.
We will seize the power of returns-on-investment to reintermediate.
Democracy has revolutionized the abstraction of functionalities. The metrics for real-world raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not compelling. A company that can innovate defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to seize faithfully. Do you have a plan of action to become C2C2C? If all of this seems staggering to you, that's because it is! We understand that if you redefine wirelessly then you may also monetize perfectly. The metrics for power shifts are more well-understood if they are not extensible. We pride ourselves not only on our granular feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy configuration. Quick: do you have a six-sigma scheme for regulating emerging solutions? Quick: do you have a distributed game plan for dealing with emerging methodologies? The Total Quality Control factor is leading-edge. A company that can innovate easily will (at some point in the future) be able to innovate fiercely. What does the jargon-based industry jargon "sexy" really mean?

In association with Amazon.com