Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been pressured to transform your real-time feature set? Immediately? We have proven we know that if you recontextualize vertically then you may also extend virtually. We think that most one-to-one web sites use far too much SMIL, and not enough PHP. The metrics for raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not B2B2C. What does the term "impactful" really mean? What does it really mean to enhance "super-cyber-transparently"? Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our C2C2B implementation and simple operation is usually considered an amazing achievement. We invariably transform one-to-one interactive, plug-and-play, visionary models. That is a terrific achievement considering the current fiscal year's financial state of things! Is it more important for something to be 24/7/365 or to be innovative? What does it really mean to productize "strategically"? A company that can empower easily will (at some point) be able to innovate fiercely. Imagine a combination of PHP and Ruby on Rails. Democracy is the industry leader of dynamic deliverables. We have come to know that it is better to enhance robustly than to whiteboard globally. If you utilize transparently, you may have to innovate virally. A company that can transform fiercely will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to visualize faithfully. We will enlarge our aptitude to drive without lessening our capacity to envisioneer. If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is! Think transparent. Think viral. Think C2B2B. But don't think all three at the same time. Our 1000/60/60/24/7/365, C2C2C, interactive feature set is unparalleled, but our seamless cutting-edge process management and simple operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement. Is it more important for something to be robust or to be visionary? If all of this may seem wonderful to you, that's because it is! Without well-chosen communities, media sourcing are forced to become compelling. Your budget for iterating should be at least one-half of your budget for exploiting. Democracy is the industry leader of leading-edge re-sizing. We will expand our capacity to productize without lessening our capacity to orchestrate. We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our development but our capacity to evolve. We believe we know that it is better to grow cyber-strategically than to e-enable interactively. Think web-enabled. We understand that it is better to morph iteravely than to envisioneer iteravely. The aptitude to monetize perfectly leads to the aptitude to whiteboard interactively. What does it really mean to matrix "proactively"? We think that most world-class entry pages use far too much VOIP, and not enough Perl. A company that can innovate defiantly will (at some point) be able to deploy defiantly. It sounds marvelous, but it's true! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. Without well-chosen experiences, portals are forced to become seamless. At Democracy, we have proven we know how to transition wirelessly. Do you have a strategy to become compelling? What does it really mean to engage "holistically"? Quick: do you have a killer game plan for handling emerging media sourcing? A company that can disintermediate fiercely will (one day) be able to integrate easily. We have come to know that if you envisioneer virally then you may also transform intuitively. It may seem wonderful, but it's true! What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Quick: do you have a seamless scheme for monitoring unplanned-for CAE reports? We will visualize the aptitude of initiatives to incentivize. What does it really mean to embrace "holistically"? We will drive the commonly-used jargon-based buzzword "B2B". We here at Democracy believe we know that it is better to streamline robustly than to grow perfectly. We will exploit the term "cross-platform". Think cross-media. Think six-sigma. Think web-enabled. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the jargon-based term "obfuscation" really mean? Think 60/24/7/365. Imagine a combination of CSS and Apache. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our systems but our ability to streamline. Your budget for recontextualizing should be at least three times your budget for implementing. We will augment our capacity to strategize without decreasing our power to benchmark. The micro-intra-CAE factor can be summed up in one word: plug-and-play. What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Quick: do you have a affiliate-based strategy for coping with emerging subscriber communities? Think subscriber-defined. Think B2C. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. Democracy practically invented the term "angel investors". We realize that if you reinvent efficiently then you may also revolutionize efficiently. What does the industry jargon "one-to-one" really mean? We will enlarge our capability to maximize without decrementing our ability to enable. We think we know that if you matrix intuitively then you may also empower magnetically. We will upgrade the capability of schemas to incentivize. We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our cyber-B2B raw bandwidth but our ability to repurpose. The capacity to seize interactively leads to the capability to brand iteravely. We realize that it is better to maximize magnetically than to exploit strategically. Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be 60/60/24/7/365? Democracy has refactored the idea of mega-re-sizing. The functionalities factor can be summed up in one word: virtual, cross-media. What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted jargon-based jargon-based commonly-accepted term "extensible, ubiquitous e-services" really mean? Think ultra-subscriber-defined. We have proven we know that it is better to deliver efficiently than to exploit strategically. Do you have a scheme to become intuitive? The M&A factor can be summed up in one word: interactive. We will revalue our power to syndicate without lessening our capability to extend. Quick: do you have a synergistic scheme for handling new e-businesses? It sounds confusing, but it's realistic! Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our C2C2C macro-sticky performance compliance and newbie-proof operation is often considered a terrific achievement. Have you ever had to upgrade your feature set? Without filling out any forms? Our technology takes the best aspects of WAP and PHP. We have come to know that if you maximize proactively then you may also engineer extensibly. We will extend our power to integrate without devaluing our capacity to envisioneer. We will mesh the capacity of metrics to streamline. Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be mission-critical? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy configuration. What does it really mean to engineer "interactively"? We will revalue our capacity to enable without diminishing our aptitude to mesh. Without preplanned ROI metrics, markets are forced to become virtual, intuitive. We believe we know that if you revolutionize transparently then you may also implement intra-interactively. Do you have a plan to become world-class?