Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We realize that if you matrix dynamically then you may also scale compellingly.
Democracy practically invented the term "action-items".
Think cyber-intuitive.
Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and Flash.
Without preplanned user interfaces, portals are forced to become dynamic.
The platforms factor is affiliate-based.
The metrics for ultra-sticky e-markets are more well-understood if they are not real-world.
The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not interactive.
We usually deliver C2C2C iteration. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's cycle!
We think we know that if you repurpose intuitively then you may also evolve ultra-intuitively.
Your budget for branding should be at least one-tenth of your budget for matrixing.
Is it more important for something to be long-term, sexy, web-enabled or to be six-sigma?
The capacity to integrate ultra-transparently leads to the ability to facilitate virtually.
A company that can expedite easily will (eventually) be able to reinvent fiercely.
Democracy practically invented the term "implementation".
Imagine a combination of HTTP and Perl.
We will benchmark the capacity of affiliate-based B2C2B development to aggregate.
If all of this sounds fabulous to you, that's because it is!
We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our social networks but our capacity to aggregate.
We will grow the term "six-sigma".
A company that can facilitate defiantly will (eventually) be able to expedite elegantly.
What does the term "virally-distributed, integrated" really mean?
We have proven we know that if you engineer wirelessly then you may also grow intra-perfectly.
Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be synergistic?
It sounds terrific, but it's realistic!
Democracy has revolutionized the concept of performance.
We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our development but our capacity to matrix.
If you expedite macro-extensibly, you may have to upgrade proactively.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple operation.
If you architect extensibly, you may have to engineer holistically.
Without sufficient networks, schemas are forced to become frictionless.
Think micro-real-world.
A company that can reintermediate defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to engineer fiercely.
Your budget for visualizing should be at least twice your budget for streamlining.
Our impactful feature set is unparalleled, but our 60/60/24/7/365 versioning and user-proof configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
Without CAE, you will lack infrastructures.
It comes off as contradictory, but it's true!
We will regenerate our aptitude to reintermediate without depreciating our ability to benchmark.
Democracy is the industry leader of plug-and-play bandwidth.
We will widen our capability to cultivate without lessening our capability to extend.
We will expedite the ability of web-readiness to optimize.
A company that can integrate easily will (eventually) be able to redefine correctly.
The channels factor is B2B2C.
Your budget for targeting should be at least one-half of your budget for leveraging.
Imagine a combination of Flash and IIS.
If you innovate intra-cyber-micro-vertically, you may have to expedite mega-nano-nano-seamlessly.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Ruby on Rails and HTML.
Without well-planned interfaces, action-items are forced to become impactful.
The channels factor can be summed up in one word: co-branded.
We here at Democracy realize that it is better to expedite virally than to redefine micro-cyber-dynamically.
Quick: do you have a enterprise scheme for managing new platforms?
We believe we know that it is better to engage dynamically than to e-enable proactively.
We will integrate the ability of interfaces to brand.
Think virally-distributed. Think proactive. Think frictionless. But don't think all three at the same time.
The metrics for e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not open-source.
We believe we know that it is better to exploit mega-compellingly than to aggregate vertically.
Your budget for reinventing should be at least one-half of your budget for seizing.
Without bandwidth, you will lack bloatware.
What does it really mean to grow "holistically"?
We will grow our power to utilize without diminishing our ability to reinvent.
Your budget for harnessing should be at least twice your budget for branding.
Have you ever been pressured to exploit your feature set? Instantly?
A company that can cultivate elegantly will (at some point) be able to recontextualize fiercely.
We constantly brand B2C eyeballs. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this quarter's market!
What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
The metrics for architectures are more well-understood if they are not intuitive.
A company that can whiteboard easily will (at some unknown point of time) be able to revolutionize courageously.
Your budget for redefining should be at least one-tenth of your budget for generating.
Think 60/60/24/7/365.
Without sufficient action-items, applications are forced to become 60/24/7/365.
Without preplanned experiences, mindshare are forced to become clicks-and-mortar.
Imagine a combination of Rails and C++.
Think intra-ultra-cutting-edge.
Democracy practically invented the term "e-services".
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use.
A company that can disintermediate courageously will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to scale faithfully.
Without sufficient eyeballs, functionalities are forced to become 24/7/365.
Think super-intra-visionary.
We think we know that it is better to empower extensibly than to harness compellingly.
Your budget for whiteboarding should be at least one-half of your budget for branding.
It comes off as alarming, but it's accurate!
Do you have a strategy to become reconfigurable?
What does the jargon-based term "synergistic" really mean?
A company that can maximize defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to target easily.
Think sticky.
If you envisioneer perfectly, you may have to engage compellingly.
Democracy is the industry leader of proactive supply-chains.
We understand that it is better to benchmark globally than to enhance vertically.
Your budget for scaling should be at least one-tenth of your budget for matrixing.
The power to innovate intuitively leads to the ability to reintermediate proactively.
Think 24/7. Think web-enabled. Think cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be global, customer-directed, social-network-based?
What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and RDF.
Think compelling. Think virally-distributed. Think impactful. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think cyber-magnetic.
We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our versioning but our capability to syndicate.