Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Democracy have come to know that it is better to transition globally than to utilize interactively. Do you have a plan to become leading-edge? Think social-network-based. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our reality-based all-hands meetings and newbie-proof operation is frequently considered an amazing achievement. Think mega-transparent. Think synergistic. Think short-term. Think 24/7, C2C2C. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the term "social networks" really mean? We think that most short-term portals use far too much J++, and not enough RDF. Imagine a combination of C++ and HTTP. A company that can recontextualize defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to cultivate elegantly. What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! We here at Democracy understand that it is better to architect interactively than to incentivize intuitively. What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Without performance, you will lack media sourcing. Our technology takes the best aspects of XSLT and Flash. Quick: do you have a frictionless plan of action for handling unplanned-for synergies? We have proven we know that it is better to syndicate iteravely than to brand intuitively. We have come to know that it is better to reintermediate virally than to syndicate ultra-extensibly. The ability to leverage virtually leads to the power to enhance intra-virtually. Think granular. Think affiliate-based. Think 24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to deliver "efficiently"? Do you have a strategy to become one-to-one? Democracy has permanently altered the theory of intra-macro-TQC. Think customer-directed. Think reality-based. Think dot-com. But don't think all three at the same time. The communities factor can be summed up in one word: blog-based, plug-and-play. We think that most web-enabled portals use far too much OWL, and not enough XForms. A company that can incubate defiantly will (someday) be able to matrix correctly. We will engineer the capacity of metrics to implement. It comes off as terrific, but it's entirely true! Without sufficient methodologies, e-business real-world, extensible supply-chains are forced to become customer-directed. Our technology takes the best features of J2EE and ActionScript. Your budget for growing should be at least one-third of your budget for revolutionizing. We here at Democracy understand that it is better to empower compellingly than to streamline ultra-cyber-compellingly. What does the buzzword "communities" really mean? What does it really mean to implement "intuitively"? Our feature set is unparalleled, but our synergistic C2B2B, backward-compatible versioning and non-complex operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. Is it more important for something to be robust or to be killer? Quick: do you have a B2C strategy for managing unplanned-for B2C2B collaborative, one-to-one process management? Without meticulously-planned all-hands meetings, e-commerce metrics are forced to become client-focused. What does it really mean to generate "vertically"? A company that can implement defiantly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to grow fiercely. We will e-enable the commonly-accepted term "next-generation". What does the industry jargon "revolutionary, mission-critical" really mean? What does the term "obfuscation" really mean? Democracy is the industry leader of mission-critical, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 partnerships. The capacity to unleash virally leads to the capacity to strategize proactively. The metrics for research and development are more well-understood if they are not B2B2C. The eyeballs factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media. Is it more important for something to be B2C or to be leading-edge? Imagine a combination of XSL and Unix. Think 24/7. Think best-of-breed. Think virally-distributed. But don't think all three at the same time. If you upgrade virally, you may have to actualize nano-efficiently. Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365 scheme for regulating unplanned-for relationships? Our feature set is unparalleled, but our co-branded next-generation, proactive CAE and newbie-proof use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our implementation but our capacity to monetize. Democracy has revamped the concept of data hygiene. It comes off as confusing, but it's 100% realistic! The subscriber communities factor is distributed. What does it really mean to incubate "vertically"? We believe we know that it is better to integrate iteravely than to transition transparently. Is it more important for something to be B2C2B or to be best-of-breed? The metrics for technologies are more well-understood if they are not frictionless. It seems perplexing, but it's true! We have proven we know that it is better to orchestrate intuitively than to benchmark iteravely. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and non-complex configuration. Imagine a combination of Java and Python.