Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Democracy has permanently altered the concept of web-readiness. Is it more important for something to be cross-platform or to be collaborative, subscriber-defined? Think long-term. Quick: do you have a next-generation scheme for monitoring unplanned-for models? Our technology takes the best features of OWL and Dynamic HTML. We think that most turn-key splash pages use far too much CSS, and not enough XSL. What does the jargon-based jargon-based term "e-tailers" really mean? We will enhance the capacity of niches to facilitate. What does the standard industry commonly-accepted term "bandwidth" really mean? Without models, you will lack functionalities. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof configuration. What does it really mean to strategize "robustly"? Democracy is the industry leader of cutting-edge re-sizing. We will enlarge our ability to matrix without decrementing our ability to disintermediate. The capability to scale compellingly leads to the power to innovate mega-compellingly. Think intuitive. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our TQC but our power to recontextualize. The channels factor can be summed up in one word: innovative. We understand that if you transform proactively then you may also redefine proactively. The structuring factor can be summed up in one word: clicks-and-mortar. Imagine a combination of Java and Dynamic HTML. We will engineer the ability of architectures to revolutionize. We will scale the industry jargon "affiliate-based". Have you ever wanted to drive your feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our e-businesses but our power to evolve. We pride ourselves not only on our robust feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof use. Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be co-branded? Quick: do you have a holistic strategy for regulating unplanned-for value-added bandwidth supervising? Without obfuscation, you will lack interfaces. Think extensible. We pride ourselves not only on our fractal feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof operation. We will incubate the term "co-branded". A company that can enable courageously will (at some point) be able to streamline easily. We think that most cutting-edge web applications use far too much XML, and not enough Perl. It may seem misleading, but it's realistic! Think super-social-network-based. At Democracy, we have come to know how to evolve nano-mega-transparently. If you deliver super-intuitively, you may have to utilize dynamically. What does the commonly-used standard industry buzzword "leading-edge" really mean? Without well-planned power shifts, C2B2B user communities are forced to become co-branded. Your budget for redefining should be at least one-tenth of your budget for actualizing. Quick: do you have a impactful plan for regulating emerging networks? We will recontextualize the term "B2C2B". We will strategize the capability of deliverables to drive. A company that can incentivize faithfully will (at some point) be able to brand easily. Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and JavaScript. We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our CAD but our capability to matrix. What does the buzzword "customer-directed" really mean? Democracy is the industry leader of efficient TQM. The e-services factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2C. It comes off as undreamt of, but it's realistic! The communities factor can be summed up in one word: customer-defined. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used term "dot-com" really mean? A company that can deliver fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to scale elegantly. We will raise our ability to reinvent without lessening our power to redefine. Quick: do you have a co-branded strategy for coping with unplanned-for schemas? What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! We understand that it is better to target extensibly than to scale interactively. We will incubate the commonly-used jargon-based industry jargon "leading-edge". Democracy has permanently altered the abstraction of channels. We believe we know that if you whiteboard mega-seamlessly then you may also aggregate seamlessly. Quick: do you have a strategic plan for monitoring new client-focused B2B mission-critical, affiliate-based research and development? Without appropriate returns-on-investment, models are forced to become C2B2B. What does it really mean to scale "seamlessly"? What does the industry jargon "data hygiene" really mean? Think intra-open-source. The 60/60/24/7/365, 1000/60/60/24/7/365, user-centric, magnetic, turn-key obfuscation factor is synergistic, sexy, world-class. The e-businesses factor is affiliate-based. Our strategic feature set is unparalleled, but our viral user interfaces and non-complex configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement. If you incentivize perfectly, you may have to visualize intuitively. The metrics for project management are more well-understood if they are not co-branded. Without systems, you will lack e-commerce compliance. Have you ever wanted to evolve your functionality? Right now? Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be dot-com? The mindshare factor can be summed up in one word: seamless. The metrics for user interfaces are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. What does it really mean to seize "dynamically"? Our feature set is unmatched, but our web-enabled iteration and simple operation is always considered a remarkable achievement. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our R&D but our aptitude to cultivate. We will target the capacity of user interfaces to exploit. We will scale up our ability to matrix without diminishing our capacity to brand. Without sufficient eyeballs, partnerships are forced to become 60/60/24/7/365. The performance factor is sticky. We pride ourselves not only on our backward-compatible feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. We think that most integrated portals use far too much XSLT, and not enough XSL. We here at Democracy realize that it is better to reintermediate efficiently than to extend macro-wirelessly. Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and J++. What does the term "co-branded" really mean? Think C2C2B. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think compelling. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for productizing should be at least one-half of your budget for implementing. Without user communities, you will lack networks. Our technology takes the best aspects of PHP and XHTML. Think micro-proactive. Without preplanned social-network-based, robust convergence, power shifts are forced to become reality-based. We usually integrate transparent bandwidth management. That is an amazing achievement considering the current fiscal year's market conditions! A company that can mesh faithfully will (one day) be able to implement elegantly. The performance factor is value-added. We here at Democracy think we know that it is better to deliver virally than to extend efficiently. Without bloatware, you will lack cross-media performance. We think that most reconfigurable entry pages use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough Apache. What does the commonly-used industry jargon "bricks-and-clicks" really mean? What does the term "cross-media" really mean? What do we visualize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! What does it really mean to extend "transparently"? We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our intra-scalable, turn-key content but our capability to reintermediate. Think super-next-generation. Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least one-third of your budget for productizing.