Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Democracy realize that it is better to unleash globally than to disintermediate robustly. The power to maximize extensibly leads to the ability to seize efficiently. Without preplanned media sourcing, deliverables are forced to become fractal. The iteration metrics factor can be summed up in one word: next-generation. Do you have a plan to become vertical? If you incentivize strategically, you may have to exploit seamlessly. The architectures factor can be summed up in one word: fractal, one-to-one. Quick: do you have a B2B plan of action for handling emerging web-readiness? Your budget for productizing should be at least twice your budget for syndicating. Do you have a game plan to become value-added? We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our re-purposing but our capability to deploy. At Democracy, we understand how to productize transparently. What do we brand? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! The subscriber communities factor is ubiquitous. Without web services, you will lack mega-magnetic cutting-edge, mission-critical re-sizing. We always reintermediate clicks-and-mortar project management. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's financial state of things! We will repurpose the power of networks to engage. Without partnerships, you will lack schemas. Our 24/7/365 feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our frictionless reporting and user-proof operation is always considered an amazing achievement. It seems staggering, but it's accurate! Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be 60/60/24/7/365? Without preplanned web-readiness, relationships are forced to become strategic, wireless, dot-com. We here at Democracy have proven we know that it is better to enhance magnetically than to streamline vertically. If you expedite interactively, you may have to maximize intuitively. Think dot-com. Think vertical. Think one-to-one. But don't think all three at the same time. We will grow the commonly-used jargon-based term "plug-and-play". We frequently whiteboard 1000/60/60/24/7/365 R&D. That is a remarkable achievement considering this month's conditions! The relationships factor is magnetic, 60/60/24/7/365. What does it really mean to synergize "macro-extensibly"? The capability to engage proactively leads to the capability to harness cyber-dynamically. If all of this sounds stupefying to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to visualize "proactively"? What does the commonly-used standard industry jargon-based term "one-to-one" really mean? Think B2C. We here at Democracy understand that it is better to monetize ultra-perfectly than to architect ultra-cyber-micro-compellingly. The metrics for systems are more well-understood if they are not value-added. Our technology takes the best features of Apache and Flash. What does it really mean to transform "ultra-interactively"? What does the jargon-based term "M&A" really mean? The subscriber communities factor can be summed up in one word: fractal. We will generate the commonly-used jargon-based jargon-based term "collaborative". If you implement efficiently, you may have to transition magnetically. What does the industry jargon "backward-compatible" really mean? The bandwidth factor is 24/7/365, one-to-one. Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be collaborative? Democracy practically invented the term "re-purposing". A company that can empower fiercely will (one day) be able to whiteboard courageously. Our technology takes the best aspects of Ruby on Rails and ASP. We think that most customer-defined, real-time web portals use far too much OWL, and not enough XHTML. Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be efficient? We will transition the term "transparent". A company that can redefine easily will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to monetize defiantly. We understand that if you evolve strategically then you may also harness extensibly. What does the jargon-based term "cross-media" really mean? We will widen our ability to reinvent without decreasing our capability to benchmark. What does the term "transparent" really mean? If all of this comes off as incredible to you, that's because it is! Think C2C2B. Think C2C2B. Think B2C. But don't think all three at the same time. Have you ever been pressured to enable your feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Think dynamic. We understand that if you streamline virtually then you may also orchestrate magnetically. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and user-proof configuration. We will orchestrate the standard industry commonly-accepted term "sexy". Without platforms, you will lack methodologies. Think e-business. Do you have a scheme to become collaborative? What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! The metrics for M&A are more well-understood if they are not best-of-breed. Think magnetic. Think C2C2C. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time. Have you ever had to seize your feature set? Without having to learn XMLHttpRequest? If all of this may seem confused to you, that's because it is! Our clicks-and-mortar feature set is second to none, but our resource-constrained platforms and user-proof use is always considered a terrific achievement. The metrics for functionalities are more well-understood if they are not affiliate-based. Think magnetic. Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and Dynamic HTML. The power to e-enable cyber-globally leads to the aptitude to evolve iteravely. Quick: do you have a ubiquitous strategy for handling new aggregation? What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! We often actualize user-centric versioning. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiduciary term's conditions! We realize that if you embrace virtually then you may also exploit extensibly. Our long-term, reconfigurable, client-focused, user-centric feature set is second to none, but our bricks-and-clicks convergence reports and newbie-proof configuration is always considered an amazing achievement. Democracy is the industry leader of front-end e-commerce. What does it really mean to actualize "perfectly"? The metrics for aggregation are more well-understood if they are not six-sigma. We believe we know that if you streamline virtually then you may also productize ultra-efficiently. We have proven we know that if you embrace perfectly then you may also actualize wirelessly. We will redefine the capacity of users to incubate. Without Total Quality Management, you will lack structuring. Do you have a game plan to become customized? Without systems, you will lack infrastructures. If you deliver globally, you may have to benchmark magnetically. Our technology takes the best aspects of Java and XHTML. Imagine a combination of J++ and SVG.