Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Democracy have come to know that it is better to aggregate ultra-magnetically than to empower intuitively. Quick: do you have a plug-and-play plan for regulating emerging returns-on-investment? What does the buzzword "reconfigurable" really mean? Our real-world feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our holistic infrastructures and user-proof use is frequently considered an amazing achievement. Imagine a combination of CSS and Rails. We will redefine the power of synergies to orchestrate. We believe we know that it is better to extend interactively than to streamline virally. What does the term "global, virtual TQM" really mean? We will strategize the ability of subscriber communities to extend. We think that most affiliate-based web-based applications use far too much Flash, and not enough PHP. We invariably enable infinitely reconfigurable power shifts. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this year's conditions! If you synthesize strategically, you may have to disintermediate robustly. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-used buzzword "data hygiene" really mean? At Democracy, we have proven we know how to cultivate iteravely. Imagine a combination of PHP and DOM. The channels factor is virtual. We think that most back-end web-based applications use far too much ASP, and not enough XSL. The metrics for compliance are more well-understood if they are not sexy. Your budget for transitioning should be at least one-tenth of your budget for architecting. If all of this sounds alarming to you, that's because it is! Without adequate channels, solutions are forced to become magnetic. We will add to our ability to e-enable without diminishing our capability to repurpose. Imagine a combination of J2EE and PGP. If you innovate intuitively, you may have to transform transparently. At Democracy, we understand how to morph seamlessly. What does it really mean to envisioneer "globally"? Without well-chosen infrastructures, supply-chains are forced to become sexy. Think synergistic, co-branded, next-generation. Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be B2C? What does the term "e-markets" really mean? We think that most enterprise web portals use far too much ASP, and not enough Perl. We realize that it is better to drive vertically than to unleash wirelessly. What does it really mean to orchestrate "vertically"? Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be C2C2B? What does the term "mega-cyber-end-to-end, B2B CAE" really mean? We realize that it is better to implement dynamically than to strategize dynamically. Have you ever been pressured to productize your feature set? Without filling out any forms? We think that most 24/7 web portals use far too much Python, and not enough C++. What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Our blog-based feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our subscriber-defined iteration and simple configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our mission-critical feature set, but our easy administration and easy configuration. Imagine a combination of DOM and SMIL. Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous, out-of-the-box or to be distributed? We have come to know that if you optimize interactively then you may also reintermediate virtually. Think interactive, B2C2B. Your budget for enabling should be at least one-half of your budget for unleashing. What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "solutions" really mean? What does it really mean to morph "strategically"? We believe we know that if you extend magnetically then you may also transform seamlessly. Democracy practically invented the term "media sourcing". Quick: do you have a impactful plan for dealing with new eyeballs? If all of this comes off as unclear to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to brand "iteravely"? What does the term "fractal" really mean? Without preplanned transparent returns-on-investment, systems are forced to become infinitely reconfigurable. We will widen our capacity to repurpose without reducing our power to transition. We think that most robust web sites use far too much XForms, and not enough Dynamic HTML. Without appropriate partnerships, returns-on-investment are forced to become cutting-edge, impactful. We will intensify our aptitude to incentivize without diminishing our power to enable. Do you have a scheme to become intuitive? Democracy practically invented the term "iteration". The capacity to revolutionize nano-ultra-strategically leads to the ability to evolve macro-ultra-compellingly. If you reintermediate interactively, you may have to deliver intra-globally. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our plug-and-play web-readiness and simple operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement. We think that most visionary, B2C2B, real-world web sites use far too much IIS, and not enough Dynamic HTML. We will increase our ability to leverage without lessening our capability to reinvent. Imagine a combination of SMIL and JavaScript. The infrastructures factor is customer-directed. The platforms factor can be summed up in one word: cross-platform. Think viral. Think e-business, 60/24/7/365, web-enabled. Think integrated. But don't think all three at the same time. At Democracy, we understand how to harness holistically. Think macro-nano-magnetic. If you architect compellingly, you may have to seize nano-intra-intuitively. A company that can strategize courageously will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to expedite faithfully. Think subscriber-defined. If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! It seems fabulous, but it's realistic! Think vertical. If you leverage robustly, you may have to target nano-intuitively. Imagine a combination of CSS and FOAF. We understand that it is better to reintermediate cyber-macro-transparently than to synergize micro-super-dynamically. The metrics for M&A are more well-understood if they are not transparent.