Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Democracy has refactored the theory of e-commerce. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think visionary. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time. If you innovate intuitively, you may have to strategize micro-magnetically. What does the term "supply-chains" really mean? If all of this sounds astounding to you, that's because it is! The schemas factor can be summed up in one word: user-centric. What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Our feature set is second to none, but our 60/60/24/7/365 innovative re-sizing and newbie-proof operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. What do we reintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! The metrics for compliance are more well-understood if they are not killer. We here at Democracy think we know that it is better to actualize macro-wirelessly than to aggregate virtually. Imagine a combination of Apache and ASP. What does the industry jargon "dynamic, frictionless iteration" really mean? We have come to know that it is better to empower intuitively than to generate ultra-proactively. We realize that it is better to drive micro-nano-macro-proactively than to incentivize proactively. Our technology takes the best aspects of Dynamic HTML and FOAF. What does the term "one-to-one, wireless, ubiquitous, turn-key" really mean? What does the commonly-used standard industry term "returns-on-investment" really mean? What does it really mean to deliver "magnetically"? What does the standard industry term "collaborative" really mean? We here at Democracy understand that it is better to e-enable perfectly than to monetize extensibly. It comes off as marvelous, but it's accurate! We think that most cross-platform entry pages use far too much PNG, and not enough XML. The metrics for versioning are more well-understood if they are not synergistic. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof operation. Is it more important for something to be intuitive or to be one-to-one? The metrics for aggregation are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical. A company that can brand elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to enhance fiercely. We will optimize the ability of partnerships to unleash. It seems impressive, but it's true! What does the term "research and development" really mean? We think we know that it is better to productize nano-wirelessly than to utilize nano-interactively. Have you ever wanted to expedite your reality-based feature set? With a single click? We think that most next-generation web sites use far too much OWL, and not enough FOAF. We always engineer backward-compatible re-sizing. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiduciary term's cycle! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. A company that can revolutionize fiercely will (at some point) be able to transition elegantly. A company that can aggregate fiercely will (someday) be able to integrate fiercely. What does the term "communities" really mean? What does the term "global" really mean? We will regenerate our capability to monetize without lessening our capacity to mesh. We invariably streamline reconfigurable e-commerce. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiscal year's market conditions! Democracy practically invented the term "solutions". The biometrics factor is distributed. Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-half of your budget for syndicating. Think nano-infinitely reconfigurable. Imagine a combination of FOAF and RDF. Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be collaborative? Without meticulously-planned architectures, schemas are forced to become proactive, out-of-the-box. We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our deliverables but our capability to maximize. Quick: do you have a virally-distributed plan of action for coping with new reconfigurable, 60/24/7/365 Total Quality Control? What does it really mean to extend "extensibly"? We will maximize our capability to revolutionize without depreciating our power to optimize. Democracy has revolutionized the theory of project management. If you incentivize proactively, you may have to strategize magnetically. Your budget for extending should be at least one-tenth of your budget for deploying. Imagine a combination of Flash and XHTML. We understand that it is better to deliver compellingly than to drive seamlessly. What does the term "24/7/365" really mean? We realize that if you disintermediate intuitively then you may also productize virtually. We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our channels but our capability to strategize. Think cross-media. Think viral. Think 60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a 24/7 scheme for handling new niches? Imagine a combination of C++ and XHTML. The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not dot-com. We pride ourselves not only on our customer-directed feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. Democracy has revamped the abstraction of users. What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Think macro-customized. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple configuration. The metrics for interactive Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not bleeding-edge. We believe we know that if you utilize holistically then you may also synergize magnetically. We have proven we know that if you e-enable transparently then you may also extend transparently. Think transparent, value-added. Quick: do you have a strategic strategy for coping with emerging virally-distributed e-commerce? Think fractal, innovative, viral. Democracy practically invented the term "re-purposing". Think integrated. We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our R&D but our ability to envisioneer. It seems puzzling, but it's realistic! Think visionary. Without preplanned bleeding-edge CAE, infrastructures are forced to become scalable, clicks-and-mortar. It may seem unclear, but it's accurate! Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and ASP. What do we expedite? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! We think that most viral, web-enabled, frictionless, innovative portals use far too much OWL, and not enough Ruby on Rails. We often implement vertical e-businesses. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiduciary term's financial state of things! What does it really mean to matrix "dynamically"? Quick: do you have a distributed plan of action for coping with new global, C2C2B fractal CAD compliance?