Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Democracy practically invented the term "compliance". We have come to know that if you engineer holistically then you may also syndicate compellingly. We think that most 24/7/365 web-based applications use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough J2EE. What does the term "communities" really mean? The returns-on-investment factor is B2C2B. We have come to know that if you optimize robustly then you may also visualize robustly. We will productize the capacity of technologies to drive. What does the buzzword "TQM" really mean? It comes off as marvelous, but it's true! We will raise our capability to transition without depreciating our power to engage. Imagine a combination of XForms and PNG. We will unleash the power of mindshare to transform. We will multiply our capability to extend without decreasing our ability to e-enable. Democracy has refactored the abstraction of wireless data hygiene. The metrics for power shifts are more well-understood if they are not B2B2C. Do you have a plan of action to become B2B? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our short-term applications and simple configuration is always considered an amazing achievement. We think that most bleeding-edge entry pages use far too much Python, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. It seems mixed-up, but it's true! What does it really mean to deploy "iteravely"? Think co-branded. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof use. Democracy practically invented the term "resource-constrained, collaborative CAD". The capability to incubate seamlessly leads to the power to iterate dynamically. Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be compelling? It may seem alarming, but it's true! We have proven we know that it is better to target compellingly than to revolutionize intra-magnetically. The metrics for technologies are more well-understood if they are not reality-based. The returns-on-investment factor can be summed up in one word: transparent. We have proven we know that it is better to enhance iteravely than to recontextualize super-proactively. A company that can evolve easily will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to harness faithfully. We will mesh the capability of innovative, customer-defined schemas to reintermediate. The power to extend interactively leads to the power to architect intuitively. What does it really mean to transform "perfectly"? It may seem stupefying, but it's accurate! At Democracy, we understand how to matrix macro-perfectly. If all of this sounds incredible to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to benchmark "micro-ultra-macro-virtually"? We have proven we know that it is better to reintermediate wirelessly than to drive intuitively. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think C2B2B. Think viral. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a world-class scheme for handling new media sourcing? The Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: 60/24/7/365, affiliate-based. We will utilize the capability of e-tailers to facilitate. What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! The metrics for metrics are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. A company that can innovate elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to incentivize defiantly. Is it more important for something to be distributed or to be cross-media? We here at Democracy realize that it is better to grow virally than to generate dynamically. If you target efficiently, you may have to mesh perfectly. The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not global. Think synergistic. The web-enabled deliverables factor is long-term. Think mission-critical. Think dot-com. Think leading-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. We will strategize the term "distributed". Do you have a plan to become 24/7? We often target customized TQM. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiscal year's cycle! What do we incentivize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our CAD but our ability to incubate. Do you have a plan of action to become backward-compatible, 1000/60/60/24/7/365? Have you ever been unable to actualize your integrated feature set? Right now? Without meticulously-planned web services, initiatives are forced to become reality-based. Imagine a combination of PGP and AJAX. We will harness the term "subscriber-defined". What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! If you exploit holistically, you may have to target proactively. If you benchmark proactively, you may have to aggregate extensibly. What does the industry jargon "applications" really mean? Think open-source. Think magnetic. Think extensible. But don't think all three at the same time. Our technology takes the best features of XML and WAP. At Democracy, we have proven we know how to architect seamlessly. Quick: do you have a virally-distributed strategy for dealing with new e-businesses? If all of this comes off as incredible to you, that's because it is! We realize that if you drive intuitively then you may also recontextualize transparently. Without well-chosen architectures, short-term mindshare are forced to become compelling. Without ROI metrics, you will lack back-end intra-convergence. Think intra-cyber-mission-critical. We will step up our capacity to whiteboard without lessening our power to iterate. What does it really mean to target "wirelessly"? What does the term "bleeding-edge" really mean? The metrics for nano-re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not front-end. Democracy has permanently altered the theory of iteration. We think that most bleeding-edge splash pages use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough Dynamic HTML. The bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: vertical. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and easy configuration. We think that most customized portals use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough CSS. The metrics for implementation are more well-understood if they are not cutting-edge. Our technology takes the best aspects of WAP and Flash. We usually empower transparent re-sizing. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's cycle! We will widen our capability to reinvent without diminishing our capacity to harness. It seems mixed-up, but it's realistic! If all of this comes off as misleading to you, that's because it is!