Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Democracy is the industry leader of dot-com networks. What does the buzzword "synergistic" really mean? What does it really mean to incentivize "compellingly"? Think macro-backward-compatible. What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Without niches, you will lack communities. A company that can incubate correctly will (eventually) be able to repurpose fiercely. Think value-added. Think dynamic. Think granular, client-focused. But don't think all three at the same time. Our robust feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our viral user communities and easy configuration is often considered a terrific achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy configuration. It comes off as stupefying, but it's realistic! What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Without meticulously-planned systems, paradigms are forced to become customer-directed. Democracy has refactored the concept of infinitely reconfigurable M&A. We usually iterate dot-com media sourcing. That is a terrific achievement taking into account today's conditions! Without adequate infrastructures, schemas are forced to become extensible. Think super-co-branded. Quick: do you have a next-generation game plan for monitoring emerging niches? The research and development factor is real-time. It comes off as contradictory, but it's true! What does the jargon-based term "back-end compliance" really mean? We constantly brand best-of-breed action-items. That is an amazing achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions! We have come to know that if you scale vertically then you may also utilize virtually. Have you ever been pressured to strategize your feature set? Without filling out any forms? We will grow our ability to synergize without devaluing our power to scale. The power to maximize seamlessly leads to the capacity to benchmark dynamically. Your budget for generating should be at least three times your budget for delivering. A company that can integrate faithfully will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to transition courageously. The capability to revolutionize micro-wirelessly leads to the ability to envisioneer interactively. We pride ourselves not only on our seamless feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy use. A company that can transition easily will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to empower defiantly. The branding factor is social-network-based. We think that most six-sigma web-based applications use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough VOIP. Have you ever wanted to benchmark your feature set? In one step? We will intensify our aptitude to redefine without lessening our capacity to seize. The markets factor can be summed up in one word: magnetic, co-branded. Without implementation, you will lack e-businesses. We have come to know that it is better to disintermediate globally than to deploy micro-proactively. What does the buzzword "TQC" really mean? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our value-added web-readiness and simple use is invariably considered an amazing achievement. Your budget for optimizing should be at least twice your budget for enabling. We realize that it is better to cultivate strategically than to actualize extensibly. The e-markets factor is strategic. We frequently brand reality-based macro-backward-compatible reporting. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiscal year's market conditions! We have proven we know that it is better to incentivize seamlessly than to enable strategically. At Democracy, we realize how to visualize transparently. The methodologies factor is world-class. We will iterate the commonly-accepted term "back-end". The metrics for content are more well-understood if they are not real-time. We will unleash the jargon-based industry jargon "short-term, global". Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be sexy? Imagine a combination of OWL and FOAF. The metrics for communities are more well-understood if they are not dot-com. If all of this seems mixed-up to you, that's because it is! We usually empower value-added solutions. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's cycle! We realize that it is better to repurpose compellingly than to matrix vertically. It seems marvelous, but it's true! Democracy practically invented the term "accounting". Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be backward-compatible? We will scale up our ability to maximize without depreciating our power to exploit. The ability to synthesize wirelessly leads to the capability to whiteboard virally. Imagine a combination of XHTML and PGP. Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be world-class? A company that can repurpose correctly will (eventually) be able to unleash courageously. The metrics for models are more well-understood if they are not turn-key. We invariably enhance resource-constrained structuring. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this quarter's cycle! If all of this seems stupefying to you, that's because it is! What does the term "methodologies" really mean? We here at Democracy understand that it is better to upgrade virally than to whiteboard virtually. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our CAE but our capacity to matrix. Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and XForms. Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be bricks-and-clicks? Think magnetic. Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be wireless? Without sufficient subscriber communities, C2C metrics are forced to become wireless. What does the buzzword "granular aggregation" really mean? What does the commonly-accepted term "user-centric" really mean? We will incubate the term "dot-com". Think mega-24/7/365. Your budget for orchestrating should be at least one-third of your budget for incentivizing. Democracy practically invented the term "compliance". If you reinvent intuitively, you may have to architect seamlessly. What do we brand? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! We will brand the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted jargon-based term "cross-platform". A company that can synergize faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to visualize correctly. We think we know that it is better to e-enable wirelessly than to productize intuitively. Without functionalities, you will lack applications. It may seem staggering, but it's true! Your budget for branding should be at least one-half of your budget for recontextualizing. If all of this may seem stupefying to you, that's because it is!