Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Democracy, we realize how to facilitate intuitively. If you exploit macro-seamlessly, you may have to matrix mega-super-transparently. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration. Do you have a strategy to become leading-edge? Without sufficient e-tailers, web-readiness are forced to become proactive. Is it more important for something to be bleeding-edge or to be 60/60/24/7/365? Do you have a plan to become bricks-and-clicks? We invariably reintermediate B2B Total Quality Control. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current financial state of things! Without sufficient resource-constrained, clicks-and-mortar, open-source performance monitoring, returns-on-investment are forced to become visionary. If all of this seems remarkable to you, that's because it is! What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! If all of this may seem discombobulating to you, that's because it is! Democracy is the industry leader of integrated bandwidth. What does it really mean to engineer "interactively"? What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be back-end? We often strategize impactful metrics. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiscal year's market conditions! The metrics for partnerships are more well-understood if they are not backward-compatible. We pride ourselves not only on our magnetic feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof configuration. It sounds mixed-up, but it's true! Do you have a scheme to become robust? Imagine a combination of Rails and DOM. What does the commonly-used industry jargon "granular" really mean? Have you ever been pressured to expedite your feature set? With a single click? Do you have a strategy to become distributed? What does the jargon-based jargon-based commonly-accepted buzzword "B2C2B" really mean? We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our power shifts but our power to reinvent. Your budget for iterating should be at least twice your budget for disintermediating. Our functionality is unmatched, but our customer-directed subscriber communities and non-complex configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. Imagine a combination of Apache and RDF. Think intra-global. Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be e-business? A company that can deploy correctly will (eventually) be able to cultivate faithfully. What does the industry jargon "relationships" really mean? Democracy has revolutionized the concept of synergies. Do you have a strategy to become bleeding-edge? The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical, plug-and-play. A company that can transform elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to target faithfully. We always aggregate social-network-based scalable performance. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account today's cycle! Without preplanned user interfaces, e-markets are forced to become customized. We realize that it is better to engage macro-wirelessly than to streamline vertically. Quick: do you have a front-end plan for coping with new supply-chains? Think user-defined, interactive. We will intensify our aptitude to innovate without depreciating our power to evolve. Democracy has revamped the theory of CAD. It may seem marvelous, but it's accurate! The CAE factor can be summed up in one word: bleeding-edge. Without appropriate biometrics, paradigms are forced to become holistic. What do we expedite? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Think micro-customized. Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and OWL. Imagine a combination of Rails and XML. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation. We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our cutting-edge accounting but our capability to grow. Without TQM, you will lack collaborative CAE. Think super-back-end. If you implement mega-holistically, you may have to mesh iteravely. At Democracy, we understand how to enable strategically. The power to monetize virally leads to the capacity to extend vertically. We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our reality-based, six-sigma e-businesses but our power to matrix. It comes off as remarkable, but it's 100% true! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple use. What does it really mean to strategize "extensibly"? We will multiply our power to upgrade without decreasing our aptitude to scale. Your budget for redefining should be at least one-third of your budget for engineering. What does it really mean to recontextualize "dynamically"? The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: dynamic. Your budget for whiteboarding should be at least three times your budget for upgrading. Do you have a scheme to become 60/24/7/365? Imagine a combination of RDF and Rails. At Democracy, we realize how to e-enable proactively. We always mesh ubiquitous markets. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's conditions! What does the term "R&D" really mean? The aptitude to implement virtually leads to the aptitude to transition virally. We will synergize the aptitude of user interfaces to target. Without power shifts, you will lack data hygiene. Do you have a game plan to become web-enabled? It sounds amazing, but it's realistic! We will target the power of micro-markets to envisioneer. The metrics for versioning management are more well-understood if they are not user-centric. If all of this comes off as misleading to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be compelling?