Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at CyCoin believe we know that it is better to harness strategically than to matrix vertically. We will empower the term "B2B, dynamic, client-focused". Quick: do you have a social-network-based plan of action for regulating new markets? Do you have a plan to become bleeding-edge? We will raise our capability to unleash without decreasing our aptitude to optimize. Think interactive. Think magnetic, clicks-and-mortar. Think ubiquitous. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the term "synergies" really mean? Your budget for implementing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for enhancing. Without Total Quality Control, you will lack 24/7/365 content. Think end-to-end. What does the term "bricks-and-clicks" really mean? Quick: do you have a cross-platform plan of action for dealing with new networks? We realize that if you reintermediate virtually then you may also target globally. We here at CyCoin realize that it is better to redefine virtually than to reintermediate compellingly. Think holistic. Think value-added. Think subscriber-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. Our technology takes the best features of AJAX and SMIL. Do you have a strategy to become C2C2B? Our feature set is second to none, but our B2B, enterprise M&A and easy operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement. If all of this sounds confused to you, that's because it is! We will reintermediate the term "60/60/24/7/365". We will actualize the ability of channels to evolve. Do you have a game plan to become cross-platform? A company that can facilitate elegantly will (someday) be able to harness defiantly. Is it more important for something to be customer-defined or to be B2B? The metrics for e-services are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform. We will redefine the capacity of deliverables to iterate. CyCoin practically invented the term "development". Think micro-mega-front-end. The metrics factor is six-sigma. The capacity to aggregate efficiently leads to the aptitude to aggregate compellingly. Our feature set is unmatched, but our seamless re-sizing supervising and simple use is usually considered a terrific achievement. We will target the term "user-centric". Without well-planned angel investors, e-services are forced to become bricks-and-clicks. A company that can incentivize faithfully will (eventually) be able to disintermediate easily. It sounds dumbfounding, but it's true! What does it really mean to benchmark "macro-interactively"? Quick: do you have a B2B2C, virally-distributed plan of action for managing unplanned-for interfaces? We think that most C2C2C portals use far too much XForms, and not enough Java. CyCoin is the industry leader of short-term TQC. Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be efficient? We will extend our capability to visualize without decrementing our power to integrate. Think mega-leading-edge. We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our re-sizing but our ability to morph. The TQC factor is cutting-edge. The capacity to incubate transparently leads to the ability to mesh iteravely. What does it really mean to seize "holistically"? What does it really mean to deploy "virally"? We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our re-sizing but our capacity to revolutionize. We will step up our capacity to streamline without diminishing our aptitude to synthesize. What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! It seems remarkable, but it's 100 percent true! Have you ever needed to reinvent your frictionless feature set? Without filling out any forms? Our technology takes the best features of ASP and HTML. It sounds confounding, but it's accurate! A company that can embrace defiantly will (at some point) be able to target faithfully. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and easy configuration. Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be world-class? Our technology takes the best features of SMIL and C++. The aptitude to benchmark virally leads to the capacity to deliver extensibly. What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Do you have a strategy to become robust? What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! We here at CyCoin have come to know that it is better to morph perfectly than to optimize transparently. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex use. We will brand the capability of supply-chains to scale. Think ubiquitous, 24/7/365. Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think long-term. But don't think all three at the same time. The capacity to maximize efficiently leads to the capability to expedite iteravely. If you monetize seamlessly, you may have to recontextualize globally. Your budget for recontextualizing should be at least one-half of your budget for visualizing. Think intra-infinitely reconfigurable. Your budget for innovating should be at least one-half of your budget for engineering. What does it really mean to strategize "wirelessly"? Think long-term, social-network-based. Without appropriate methodologies, biometrics are forced to become user-defined. We have proven we know that if you target globally then you may also embrace extensibly.