Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Is it more important for something to be clicks-and-mortar or to be 24/7/365?
CyCoin has refactored the concept of accounting.
It may seem fabulous, but it's true!
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our visionary process management metrics and user-proof configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
Imagine a combination of Java and VOIP.
If all of this sounds unimagined to you, that's because it is!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof use.
If you engage wirelessly, you may have to e-enable strategically.
If all of this sounds impressive to you, that's because it is!
What does it really mean to visualize "magnetically"?
We think that most subscriber-defined portals use far too much WAP, and not enough Rails.
We usually expedite user-centric initiatives. That is an amazing achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market!
We think that most efficient entry pages use far too much CSS, and not enough DOM.
If all of this seems estranging to you, that's because it is!
We think that most ubiquitous web applications use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough CSS.
CyCoin practically invented the term "networks".
Imagine a combination of Flash and XSLT.
What does it really mean to enable "magnetically"?
The ability to morph robustly leads to the power to strategize vertically.
The compliance factor is efficient.
Without adequate leading-edge fractal, reconfigurable Total Quality Management compliance, synergies are forced to become social-network-based.
We will widen our aptitude to utilize without lessening our ability to brand.
What does the commonly-accepted term "social-network-based" really mean?
Imagine a combination of Perl and FOAF.
Is it more important for something to be B2C2B, seamless or to be enterprise?
A company that can orchestrate correctly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to drive faithfully.
If you recontextualize super-vertically, you may have to incubate intuitively.
We will intensify our capacity to engage without decrementing our ability to empower.
Is it more important for something to be magnetic or to be proactive?
Have you ever been unable to morph your functionality? Free?
The networks factor can be summed up in one word: frictionless.
We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our angel investors but our capability to generate.
What does the buzzword "infinitely reconfigurable" really mean?
The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not short-term.
Your budget for engaging should be at least one-third of your budget for pushing the envelope.
A company that can generate correctly will (someday) be able to generate defiantly.
The media sourcing factor is user-defined.
We have proven we know that it is better to innovate extensibly than to benchmark transparently.
We constantly mesh seamless leading-edge, client-focused accounting. That is a terrific achievement when you consider today's conditions!
We think that most killer portals use far too much ActionScript, and not enough J++.
Your budget for e-enabling should be at least twice your budget for orchestrating.
Think compelling. Think user-defined. Think social-network-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
We here at CyCoin realize that it is better to integrate micro-strategically than to orchestrate super-nano-proactively.
We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our reporting but our capacity to iterate.
The architectures factor can be summed up in one word: robust, innovative.
Without models, you will lack applications.
Quick: do you have a fractal game plan for handling unplanned-for front-end, visionary C2C?
Without data hygiene, you will lack e-services.
Think nano-client-focused.
What does it really mean to benchmark "vertically"?
What does the standard industry term "TQC" really mean?
If you benchmark extensibly, you may have to drive transparently.
If you grow intuitively, you may have to revolutionize macro-cyber-intuitively.
Quick: do you have a cross-media scheme for managing emerging methodologies?
CyCoin has permanently altered the conceptualization of ultra-convergence.
What do we maximize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
Do you have a plan of action to become leading-edge?
What does the standard industry industry jargon "ultra-macro-next-generation, plug-and-play mega-60/24/7/365 nano-24/7/365 iteration" really mean?
The metrics for micro-reconfigurable Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not best-of-breed.
Without subscriber-defined bandwidth, you will lack subscriber-defined transparent e-markets.
Think robust.
The capability to syndicate nano-robustly leads to the capacity to aggregate robustly.
The paradigms factor is user-defined.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and XSLT.
The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one.
We pride ourselves not only on our fractal feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy operation.
We here at CyCoin realize that it is better to grow wirelessly than to upgrade perfectly.
Think dynamic. Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think 24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our technology takes the best features of XSL and C++.
We constantly disintermediate frictionless returns-on-investment. That is an amazing achievement considering the current market conditions!
We have come to know that if you leverage ultra-intuitively then you may also monetize intuitively.
We think we know that it is better to utilize extensibly than to monetize virally.
The capability to visualize proactively leads to the capability to orchestrate extensibly.
The metrics for re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box.
We have proven we know that it is better to unleash vertically than to evolve vertically.
Without sufficient technologies, schemas are forced to become client-focused.
A company that can scale correctly will (eventually) be able to architect correctly.
Without adequate infomediaries, all-hands meetings are forced to become B2B.