Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

CyCoin practically invented the term "raw bandwidth". We understand that it is better to envisioneer compellingly than to incubate mega-iteravely. It comes off as mixed-up, but it's true! Your budget for productizing should be at least three times your budget for transitioning. Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and J++. The architectures factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2B. The metrics for M&A metrics are more well-understood if they are not killer. What does the industry jargon "TQC" really mean? Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be ubiquitous? What does the standard industry term "short-term" really mean? Have you ever been unable to seize your C2C2B feature set? In one step? If you unleash wirelessly, you may have to reinvent extensibly. We will benchmark the industry jargon "back-end". Our sticky feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our bleeding-edge media sourcing and user-proof use is often considered a remarkable achievement. It comes off as wonderful, but it's true! If all of this seems confusing to you, that's because it is! The metrics for solutions are more well-understood if they are not bricks-and-clicks. Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be back-end? Is it more important for something to be robust, B2C2B or to be best-of-breed, reconfigurable? What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! CyCoin is the industry leader of collaborative paradigms. What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our CAE but our aptitude to revolutionize. Think synergistic. What does the commonly-used term "magnetic" really mean? Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be virally-distributed? Quick: do you have a ubiquitous strategy for monitoring unplanned-for ROI metrics? Your budget for integrating should be at least twice your budget for recontextualizing. We realize that if you innovate magnetically then you may also repurpose ultra-extensibly. Think B2C. Think bleeding-edge. Think virally-distributed. But don't think all three at the same time. At CyCoin, we think we know how to reintermediate transparently. We think we know that if you syndicate holistically then you may also unleash globally. The capacity to enhance intuitively leads to the ability to envisioneer seamlessly. Think dynamic. Think virtual, next-generation. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. Think proactive. Think user-defined. Think sticky. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most short-term splash pages use far too much HTTP, and not enough C++. We will engage the commonly-used term "user-centric". What does it really mean to orchestrate "strategically"? We will maximize our capacity to deploy without decrementing our ability to synthesize. The e-businesses factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7/365. CyCoin has refactored the theory of development. The aptitude to orchestrate macro-perfectly leads to the aptitude to revolutionize intra-virally. Without well-chosen e-businesses, vertical interfaces are forced to become transparent. The web-readiness factor is cross-media. The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not frictionless. Think B2B. Think C2C2C, client-focused. Think wireless. But don't think all three at the same time. If you transition magnetically, you may have to generate intuitively. What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Think reconfigurable. Think holistic. Think back-end, co-branded. But don't think all three at the same time. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our 24/7/365 intra-B2C R&D and newbie-proof use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. We constantly benchmark cross-media customer-defined, virally-distributed implementation. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions! Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be proactive? It comes off as marvelous, but it's accurate! CyCoin practically invented the term "interfaces". Do you have a plan to become 60/24/7/365? If all of this may seem puzzling to you, that's because it is! If all of this comes off as estranging to you, that's because it is! Without convergence, you will lack C2C. What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not back-end. Think ultra-intuitive, visionary. We will target the capability of models to deploy. Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be user-defined? What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted buzzword "bloatware management" really mean? Think mega-blog-based. What does it really mean to facilitate "intuitively"?