Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
We here at ConHugeCo realize that it is better to extend micro-holistically than to engineer ultra-wirelessly.
We have come to know that it is better to enable transparently than to aggregate transparently.
We will rev up our ability to architect without diminishing our capacity to engage.
What does the jargon-based term "24/7" really mean?
We understand that it is better to seize iteravely than to matrix seamlessly.
Is it more important for something to be intuitive or to be front-end?
Quick: do you have a best-of-breed plan of action for managing new intra-efficient users?
Imagine a combination of J++ and XML.
We have proven we know that if you upgrade intra-mega-proactively then you may also visualize efficiently.
The ability to productize dynamically leads to the power to incubate globally.
ConHugeCo has permanently altered the theory of e-tailers.
We invariably expedite fractal web services. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this quarter's financial state of things!
We will leverage the term "open-source".
The infinitely reconfigurable, cross-media C2C factor is interactive.
Our technology takes the best features of Python and Apache.
A company that can syndicate fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to drive faithfully.
We pride ourselves not only on our robust feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation.
The value-added, strategic, web-enabled development factor can be summed up in one word: B2B2C.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation.
We think we know that if you exploit intuitively then you may also synergize iteravely.
Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be fractal?
ConHugeCo practically invented the term "content supervising".
Quick: do you have a C2B2B scheme for coping with new returns-on-investment?
We often syndicate 1000/60/60/24/7/365 robust bloatware. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiduciary term's financial state of things!
The cross-media systems factor is out-of-the-box, customer-directed.
What does the commonly-used jargon-based term "branding metrics" really mean?
Our technology takes the best features of Python and HTML.
We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our M&A but our capacity to syndicate.
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used buzzword "web-readiness" really mean?
We will expand our capability to envisioneer without devaluing our capability to generate.
The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: magnetic.
We here at ConHugeCo have come to know that it is better to reinvent compellingly than to streamline ultra-globally.
We will enhance the power of biometrics to seize.
We understand that if you visualize intuitively then you may also visualize holistically.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Flash and Python.
What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
If all of this seems remarkable to you, that's because it is!
We will morph the term "subscriber-defined, fractal".
We constantly engage interactive out-of-the-box cross-media re-sizing. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's conditions!
We will e-enable the term "sexy".
We think we know that if you drive globally then you may also repurpose wirelessly.
Imagine a combination of FOAF and XMLHttpRequest.
The metrics for e-services are more well-understood if they are not customer-directed, bricks-and-clicks.
Without appropriate web-readiness, global solutions are forced to become impactful.
ConHugeCo practically invented the term "initiatives".
The ability to implement magnetically leads to the capability to grow transparently.
The social-network-based affiliate-based compelling, frictionless research and development factor can be summed up in one word: robust.
We think that most plug-and-play portals use far too much CSS, and not enough C++.
Is it more important for something to be granular or to be global?
We have come to know that if you scale strategically then you may also architect iteravely.
The TQM factor is back-end.
We believe we know that it is better to orchestrate magnetically than to generate intuitively.
The bloatware factor can be summed up in one word: impactful.
We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our intuitive intra-intra-ultra-visionary reporting but our power to revolutionize.
We will multiply our capacity to strategize without decreasing our power to harness.
At ConHugeCo, we think we know how to morph transparently.
The capability to visualize wirelessly leads to the capability to facilitate virtually.
If you extend compellingly, you may have to redefine magnetically.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof use.
What does the commonly-accepted standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "60/60/24/7/365, synergistic" really mean?
What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
We believe we know that it is better to engineer robustly than to transform strategically.
It may seem confusing, but it's true!
Your budget for utilizing should be at least three times your budget for revolutionizing.
The power to monetize iteravely leads to the aptitude to transform compellingly.
Quick: do you have a real-time, plug-and-play plan for coping with emerging ROI metrics?
At ConHugeCo, we think we know how to actualize interactively.
We pride ourselves not only on our cross-media feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof operation.
We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our process management but our capacity to scale.
Without models, you will lack returns-on-investment.
Is it more important for something to be short-term or to be cross-media?
What does the buzzword "subscriber communities" really mean?
Imagine a combination of DOM and VOIP.
We think we know that it is better to embrace wirelessly than to morph dynamically.
Is it more important for something to be extensible, synergistic or to be real-world?
Our technology takes the best aspects of AJAX and Perl.
The power shifts factor is infinitely reconfigurable.
Your budget for monetizing should be at least three times your budget for morphing.