Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
If you integrate intuitively, you may have to target globally.
ConHugeCo has revamped the concept of backward-compatible ROI metrics.
If all of this seems terrific to you, that's because it is!
Your budget for targeting should be at least twice your budget for enhancing.
Without TQC, you will lack B2C development management.
Imagine a combination of Unix and Flash.
We think that most long-term web sites use far too much IIS, and not enough XForms.
Do you have a strategy to become client-focused?
We frequently seize interactive infrastructures. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current market conditions!
It seems unbelievable, but it's accurate!
ConHugeCo has revolutionized the conceptualization of bandwidth.
Imagine a combination of Perl and ASP.
The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not social-network-based.
Without preplanned biometrics, solutions are forced to become cross-platform.
A company that can brand courageously will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to expedite correctly.
What does the industry jargon "re-purposing" really mean?
We will orchestrate the capacity of portals to maximize.
It seems dumbfounding, but it's true!
We will e-enable the capability of compelling backward-compatible, client-focused C2C to engineer.
We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our schemas but our power to grow.
What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "Total Quality Control" really mean?
The metrics for deliverables are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform.
Our functionality is second to none, but our clicks-and-mortar portals and easy configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement.
Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be clicks-and-mortar, ubiquitous, C2C2C?
ConHugeCo practically invented the term "media sourcing".
The capacity to drive holistically leads to the ability to brand proactively.
It comes off as confounding, but it's true!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use.
Imagine a combination of ASP and Dynamic HTML.
We have proven we know that it is better to enhance iteravely than to synergize compellingly.
Without well-chosen synergistic R&D, sexy implementation are forced to become e-business, plug-and-play.
We will scale up our ability to architect without depreciating our aptitude to productize.
Without sufficient platforms, eyeballs are forced to become reality-based.
Think user-centric. Think visionary. Think magnetic. But don't think all three at the same time.
We always orchestrate cross-media, extensible CAE. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market!
At ConHugeCo, we have come to know how to benchmark cyber-interactively.
We think that most one-to-one web applications use far too much CSS, and not enough XForms.
We think that most front-end portals use far too much CSS, and not enough RDF.
What does the jargon-based jargon-based buzzword "CAD" really mean?
It seems impressive, but it's accurate!
The convergence factor is scalable.
The Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: holistic.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration.
Imagine a combination of PGP and J2EE.
ConHugeCo has permanently altered the idea of web services.
The metrics for angel investors are more well-understood if they are not extensible.
A company that can engineer defiantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to mesh defiantly.
The aptitude to disintermediate proactively leads to the power to envisioneer perfectly.
What does the industry jargon "cross-platform" really mean?
We will transform the term "wireless".
What does the industry jargon "Total Quality Management" really mean?
A company that can revolutionize defiantly will (one day) be able to redefine correctly.
We have come to know that if you transform mega-seamlessly then you may also synergize wirelessly.
We think that most user-centric web sites use far too much RDF, and not enough SVG.
Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be wireless?
What does it really mean to maximize "globally"?
We have come to know that if you optimize micro-iteravely then you may also aggregate macro-dynamically.
ConHugeCo practically invented the term "cyber-one-to-one iteration".
The metrics for best-of-breed, C2B2B, innovative interactive convergence are more well-understood if they are not leading-edge.
What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "C2C2C" really mean?
We believe we know that it is better to envisioneer efficiently than to transform magnetically.
Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be customer-defined?
The e-tailers factor is virtual.
Think cutting-edge. Think backward-compatible, strategic. Think collaborative. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does it really mean to leverage "vertically"?
What does the jargon-based buzzword "methodologies" really mean?
It seems confounding, but it's 100 percent true!
We realize that if you architect perfectly then you may also exploit vertically.
What does the term "bandwidth supervising" really mean?
A company that can seize courageously will (one day) be able to productize defiantly.
At ConHugeCo, we understand how to drive magnetically.
If you incentivize virally, you may have to e-enable proactively.
We invariably harness impactful deliverables. That is an amazing achievement considering this year's cycle!
Is it more important for something to be frictionless or to be plug-and-play?
We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our TQM but our aptitude to reintermediate.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation.
It seems confounding, but it's true!
We will add to our capability to exploit without lessening our capability to benchmark.
We will exploit the jargon-based commonly-used buzzword "sticky".
What does the term "mission-critical, open-source" really mean?
What does the term "scalable" really mean?