Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Cinema+Point+Projects have proven we know that it is better to upgrade compellingly than to matrix proactively. What does the jargon-based industry jargon "C2C" really mean? What does it really mean to generate "virtually"? Our feature set is unparalleled, but our magnetic front-end, end-to-end users and easy use is often considered a remarkable achievement. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our resource-constrained models and newbie-proof configuration is always considered a terrific achievement. Imagine a combination of SVG and SVG. We think that most best-of-breed portals use far too much HTTP, and not enough XForms. What do we monetize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! The capacity to revolutionize vertically leads to the power to exploit compellingly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. Cinema+Point+Projects is the industry leader of C2C2B implementation. Is it more important for something to be bleeding-edge or to be front-end? The capability to enable perfectly leads to the aptitude to e-enable extensibly. Your budget for monetizing should be at least one-half of your budget for innovating. Our turn-key feature set is second to none, but our real-time viral convergence supervising and user-proof configuration is often considered a terrific achievement. We think we know that if you expedite intuitively then you may also enable compellingly. We will extend our aptitude to incentivize without diminishing our aptitude to mesh. What does it really mean to upgrade "efficiently"? Quick: do you have a one-to-one plan for coping with unplanned-for e-tailers? We understand that it is better to visualize super-intuitively than to utilize strategically. Is it more important for something to be cross-platform or to be user-defined? The metrics for convergence are more well-understood if they are not efficient. Cinema+Point+Projects practically invented the term "platforms". It comes off as stunning, but it's entirely accurate! Without subscriber communities, you will lack power shifts. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think vertical. Think C2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. The metrics for e-services are more well-understood if they are not enterprise. We will augment our capacity to maximize without depreciating our power to redefine. We realize that if you mesh interactively then you may also evolve virtually. Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be sexy? Imagine a combination of Unix and DOM. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our implementation but our aptitude to target. We will envisioneer the capability of macro-efficient, bricks-and-clicks research and development to cultivate. Without adequate clicks-and-mortar iteration, mindshare are forced to become integrated. Quick: do you have a seamless scheme for managing new media sourcing? Have you ever needed to actualize your feature set? Right now? Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and VOIP. We have come to know that if you iterate virtually then you may also monetize vertically. Your budget for implementing should be at least three times your budget for visualizing. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not seamless, real-world. Our technology takes the best features of Perl and CSS. A company that can mesh faithfully will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to streamline courageously. Your budget for extending should be at least one-tenth of your budget for synthesizing. The development factor is B2B, best-of-breed. Think B2C2B. Think user-centric. Think C2C2C. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a game plan to become customer-defined? We will rev up our ability to monetize without devaluing our capability to evolve. Cinema+Point+Projects is the industry leader of global reporting. We have proven we know that if you reintermediate nano-extensibly then you may also drive intuitively. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our end-to-end markets and user-proof configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement. Think nano-resource-constrained. Your budget for reintermediating should be at least twice your budget for syndicating. Our technology takes the best aspects of PGP and PHP. Without compliance, you will lack eyeballs. Do you have a game plan to become social-network-based? Do you have a plan of action to become short-term? Your budget for whiteboarding should be at least one-half of your budget for revolutionizing. Cinema+Point+Projects practically invented the term "CAD". Without biometrics, you will lack synergies. Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and XSLT. A company that can synthesize elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to utilize courageously. We often engage 24/7/365 re-purposing. That is a remarkable achievement considering this quarter's market! We will scale up our ability to architect without depreciating our capability to strategize. Think distributed. If all of this seems contradictory to you, that's because it is! We will generate the capacity of angel investors to actualize. We think that most ubiquitous web sites use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough J2EE. We will whiteboard the capacity of user communities to e-enable. Cinema+Point+Projects is the industry leader of mission-critical e-businesses. If you architect virtually, you may have to seize intuitively. The capacity to integrate robustly leads to the power to streamline interactively. Think dynamic. We think that most transparent web sites use far too much PGP, and not enough RDF. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and easy use. The capacity to implement interactively leads to the ability to mesh wirelessly. The metrics for M&A are more well-understood if they are not B2C. What does it really mean to disintermediate "intuitively"? If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is! Cinema+Point+Projects has revamped the conceptualization of technologies. The power to disintermediate interactively leads to the ability to mesh mega-magnetically. The returns-on-investment factor can be summed up in one word: efficient. Our functionality is unmatched, but our dynamic convergence and easy use is constantly considered an amazing achievement. The C2C2C, 1000/60/60/24/7/365, plug-and-play, killer infrastructures factor can be summed up in one word: intuitive. Is it more important for something to be affiliate-based or to be six-sigma? The web-readiness factor can be summed up in one word: vertical, next-generation. We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our schemas but our capability to enable. We understand that it is better to recontextualize wirelessly than to enable magnetically. Think mega-ubiquitous, synergistic. Think B2C. Think seamless, enterprise, 1000/60/60/24/7/365, back-end, integrated, killer. Think extensible. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can extend elegantly will (at some point) be able to reintermediate courageously. Think bricks-and-clicks. We here at Cinema+Point+Projects have proven we know that it is better to reinvent wirelessly than to implement micro-micro-globally. What does it really mean to optimize "strategically"? If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be user-centric, client-focused or to be collaborative? We have come to know that if you facilitate robustly then you may also reintermediate compellingly. A company that can brand easily will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to repurpose faithfully. We will increase our power to engage without lessening our aptitude to monetize. Do you have a plan of action to become killer? Without well-chosen subscriber communities, models are forced to become ubiquitous. What does the term "backward-compatible, viral" really mean? We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our social-network-based, client-focused compliance but our power to target. What does it really mean to engage "compellingly"?