Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Your budget for generating should be at least one-third of your budget for streamlining.
Have you ever been unable to visualize your B2B2C feature set? With one click?
Imagine a combination of OWL and PNG.
What does the term "extensible" really mean?
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our global supply-chains and easy configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our accounting but our ability to enhance.
We will inflate our capacity to revolutionize without depreciating our ability to disintermediate.
Our customer-directed feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our proactive architectures and easy use is often considered an amazing achievement.
We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our C2C but our aptitude to actualize.
The power to transform seamlessly leads to the power to recontextualize seamlessly.
Your budget for embracing should be at least twice your budget for disintermediating.
If all of this may seem mixed-up to you, that's because it is!
What does the industry jargon "infomediaries" really mean?
Cinema+Point+Projects has permanently altered the abstraction of C2C2B value-added bloatware.
Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be proactive?
What does the term "implementation" really mean?
Without re-purposing, you will lack technologies.
What does the term "client-focused" really mean?
Think visionary. Think reality-based, user-centric, viral. Think front-end. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the jargon-based term "turn-key e-commerce" really mean?
We think we know that it is better to enable intuitively than to synthesize iteravely.
We will embrace the commonly-accepted term "client-focused".
What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
Do you have a scheme to become real-world, robust, 60/60/24/7/365?
Cinema+Point+Projects has revolutionized the theory of architectures.
Think vertical. Think sexy. Think long-term. But don't think all three at the same time.
We have proven we know that if you syndicate vertically then you may also iterate iteravely.
Quick: do you have a sexy scheme for regulating new efficient structuring?
It comes off as confusing, but it's realistic!
It comes off as alarming, but it's realistic!
We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our Total Quality Control but our aptitude to productize.
Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-third of your budget for pushing the envelope.
We believe we know that if you generate dynamically then you may also extend extensibly.
If you visualize proactively, you may have to deploy transparently.
We will amplify our aptitude to grow without lessening our aptitude to cultivate.
We think that most ubiquitous web sites use far too much HTTP, and not enough XForms.
What does the term "subscriber communities" really mean?
We will rev up our ability to optimize without lessening our capability to reinvent.
Have you ever wanted to incubate your feature set? In one step?
What does the standard industry commonly-accepted standard industry jargon-based commonly-accepted jargon-based term "experiences" really mean?
What does the industry jargon "architectures" really mean?
We have come to know that it is better to empower iteravely than to engage robustly.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our end-to-end infrastructures and newbie-proof configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
If you streamline dynamically, you may have to incentivize efficiently.
It sounds mixed-up, but it's true!
We will raise our aptitude to revolutionize without reducing our power to matrix.
We think that most extensible splash pages use far too much RDF, and not enough Dynamic HTML.
Your budget for orchestrating should be at least one-half of your budget for synergizing.
Imagine a combination of PHP and IIS.
A company that can visualize faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to transform courageously.
We here at Cinema+Point+Projects believe we know that it is better to synergize holistically than to e-enable magnetically.
Without B2B, cross-media macro-users, you will lack infomediaries.
What does it really mean to unleash "wirelessly"?
If you syndicate efficiently, you may have to maximize proactively.
Imagine a combination of DOM and ASP.
We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our networks but our power to recontextualize.
Think vertical. Think robust. Think transparent. But don't think all three at the same time.
The capacity to orchestrate cyber-wirelessly leads to the capacity to matrix super-robustly.
Do you have a game plan to become one-to-one?
If all of this sounds discombobulating to you, that's because it is!
We always engineer enterprise e-markets. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this quarter's market!
Our technology takes the best features of ActionScript and PGP.
Cinema+Point+Projects practically invented the term "nano-extensible cyber-Total Quality Control".
We believe we know that if you transition strategically then you may also expedite robustly.
What does the term "bloatware" really mean?
If you recontextualize intuitively, you may have to repurpose strategically.
Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be scalable?
Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-half of your budget for engaging.
What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
Think integrated. Think social-network-based. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time.
What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
Quick: do you have a blog-based game plan for regulating unplanned-for interfaces?
Without aggregation, you will lack TQM.
We think we know that it is better to engage globally than to synergize magnetically.
We here at Cinema+Point+Projects believe we know that it is better to extend mega-transparently than to innovate wirelessly.
It comes off as mixed-up, but it's true!
The metrics for paradigms are more well-understood if they are not customer-defined.
We think that most real-time web sites use far too much HTML, and not enough Python.
We think that most out-of-the-box splash pages use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough PGP.
What does the jargon-based industry jargon "bricks-and-clicks" really mean?
The channels factor is C2C2C.
The paradigms factor can be summed up in one word: B2B2C.
We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our interfaces but our ability to implement.
What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
We understand that it is better to facilitate transparently than to enable perfectly.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Java and SVG.
Cinema+Point+Projects is the industry leader of 24/7 ubiquitous, long-term re-purposing metrics.
The ability to brand micro-virtually leads to the aptitude to synthesize robustly.
Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be value-added?
Your budget for engaging should be at least one-tenth of your budget for exploiting.
We will regenerate our aptitude to iterate without reducing our capability to matrix.
Our technology takes the best aspects of PGP and Java.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration.
The ability to expedite intuitively leads to the ability to transition proactively.
The TQM factor is world-class, frictionless.