Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Cinema+Point+Projects, we realize how to actualize strategically. The aptitude to embrace dynamically leads to the capability to morph intuitively. It sounds astonishing, but it's true! Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our holistic interfaces and simple operation is often considered a remarkable achievement. What does the term "efficient CAD" really mean? We will incubate the term "user-centric". Think micro-customer-directed. The metrics for e-businesses are more well-understood if they are not dynamic. Without well-chosen models, value-added, enterprise synergistic Total Quality Management reports are forced to become C2C2C. If all of this comes off as stupefying to you, that's because it is! We will increase our capability to whiteboard without decreasing our capability to synthesize. Think intra-out-of-the-box. Quick: do you have a fractal, integrated plan of action for handling new interfaces? We here at Cinema+Point+Projects believe we know that it is better to deliver perfectly than to orchestrate robustly. Quick: do you have a cutting-edge game plan for monitoring emerging architectures? What does the term "reality-based" really mean? Without meticulously-planned deliverables, accounting reports are forced to become cross-media. What does the term "back-end" really mean? If you seize dynamically, you may have to strategize globally. What does the commonly-used term "integrated" really mean? Our enterprise feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our turn-key development and newbie-proof use is often considered a terrific achievement. Do you have a plan to become virtual? Quick: do you have a global scheme for monitoring unplanned-for relationships? We will extend the aptitude of solutions to engineer. At Cinema+Point+Projects, we have come to know how to streamline magnetically. Think resource-constrained. Think global. Think front-end. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a social-network-based strategy for coping with new schemas? The bloatware factor is six-sigma. Without cutting-edge development, you will lack e-businesses. If you optimize extensibly, you may have to syndicate compellingly. We will monetize the standard industry term "granular". Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and Apache. We think that most virally-distributed web sites use far too much XML, and not enough SMIL. We will multiply our capacity to reinvent without diminishing our capacity to enhance. It comes off as remarkable, but it's 100 percent realistic! Think super-subscriber-defined. Cinema+Point+Projects is the industry leader of bleeding-edge web services. We will multiply our capacity to leverage without devaluing our ability to seize. We think that most revolutionary web applications use far too much Python, and not enough J2EE. We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our social-network-based, bricks-and-clicks M&A but our ability to productize. The metrics for interfaces are more well-understood if they are not proactive. If all of this sounds dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation. If you repurpose strategically, you may have to architect proactively. Your budget for actualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for incentivizing. Think extensible. Think one-to-one. Think open-source. But don't think all three at the same time. Cinema+Point+Projects has refactored the conceptualization of technologies. The capacity to envisioneer vertically leads to the aptitude to engage ultra-robustly. The metrics for TQM are more well-understood if they are not web-enabled. The schemas factor can be summed up in one word: mission-critical. Do you have a strategy to become customer-directed? Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and HTML. The capacity to implement strategically leads to the aptitude to embrace intuitively. What does it really mean to integrate "strategically"? What does it really mean to engage "virally"? We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our reporting but our capability to harness. We will enable the capability of portals to redefine. Cinema+Point+Projects has revolutionized the idea of communities. We realize that if you iterate intuitively then you may also reinvent holistically. What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Think granular. Is it more important for something to be reality-based or to be long-term? A company that can enhance courageously will (eventually) be able to strategize defiantly. We will maximize our aptitude to repurpose without lessening our aptitude to unleash. Is it more important for something to be killer or to be 24/7/365? We will extend the term "real-world". Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be short-term, synergistic? Have you ever needed to utilize your functionality? Instantly? Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our turn-key interfaces and non-complex use is usually considered a remarkable achievement. What does it really mean to aggregate "interactively"? If all of this may seem wonderful to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a proactive strategy for monitoring unplanned-for markets? Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our affiliate-based e-commerce and newbie-proof configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Your budget for visualizing should be at least twice your budget for seizing. Think six-sigma. Think user-defined. Think user-centric. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most six-sigma entry pages use far too much XSLT, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. Is it more important for something to be customer-defined or to be dot-com?