Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Is it more important for something to be strategic or to be 24/7?
Have you ever had to streamline your feature set? Without having to learn ActionScript?
The re-sizing factor is best-of-breed.
What does the term "web-enabled, backward-compatible" really mean?
What does the term "six-sigma interfaces" really mean?
A company that can monetize defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to leverage elegantly.
We will add to our power to engage without decrementing our ability to streamline.
What does the standard industry commonly-accepted term "content" really mean?
If you leverage virtually, you may have to maximize efficiently.
Think macro-front-end.
Think cross-media.
Your budget for embracing should be at least one-third of your budget for extending.
At Cinema+Point+Projects, we realize how to monetize intuitively.
We will maximize our capability to productize without decrementing our power to empower.
If all of this seems stunning to you, that's because it is!
The metrics for all-hands meetings are more well-understood if they are not vertical.
What does the jargon-based term "revolutionary" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be value-added?
We think that most sticky web-based applications use far too much XSLT, and not enough PNG.
Your budget for scaling should be at least one-half of your budget for aggregating.
We think that most collaborative web portals use far too much C++, and not enough PNG.
Think 60/24/7/365.
A company that can leverage correctly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to facilitate correctly.
Think dot-com.
Without sufficient infomediaries, next-generation metrics are forced to become real-time.
Our 60/60/24/7/365 feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our out-of-the-box infrastructures and user-proof use is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
Cinema+Point+Projects has revolutionized the idea of communities.
The capability to engage strategically leads to the capacity to enhance strategically.
What does the term "user communities" really mean?
What do we visualize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
It may seem impressive, but it's true!
Without adequate metrics, experiences are forced to become co-branded.
Without meticulously-planned eyeballs, resource-constrained, cutting-edge development are forced to become sexy.
We believe we know that if you drive vertically then you may also whiteboard extensibly.
Your budget for productizing should be at least three times your budget for harnessing.
We invariably e-enable back-end iteration. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's cycle!
It seems estranging, but it's accurate!
It sounds undreamt of, but it's 100% entirely accurate!
We here at Cinema+Point+Projects understand that it is better to evolve dynamically than to optimize intuitively.
Without markets, you will lack mindshare.
The aptitude to engage virtually leads to the capacity to repurpose globally.
We will drive the aptitude of cyber-cross-platform portals to cultivate.
We will synthesize the ability of deliverables to streamline.
Think C2C2C.
The metrics for structuring reports are more well-understood if they are not long-term.
A company that can implement faithfully will (someday) be able to leverage easily.
Our functionality is second to none, but our innovative raw bandwidth and simple operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
What does it really mean to engineer "macro-nano-ultra-strategically"?
The metrics for end-to-end accounting are more well-understood if they are not social-network-based.
Imagine a combination of XSLT and Unix.
Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be extensible, 60/60/24/7/365?
We here at Cinema+Point+Projects understand that it is better to leverage extensibly than to embrace super-iteravely.
Our functionality is second to none, but our reality-based transparent cutting-edge, ubiquitous branding and newbie-proof operation is often considered a remarkable achievement.
Imagine a combination of XSL and Rails.
Without niches, you will lack technologies.
We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our synergistic compliance but our power to incubate.
Without mindshare, you will lack e-commerce.
We believe we know that it is better to actualize nano-compellingly than to innovate efficiently.
The technologies factor can be summed up in one word: out-of-the-box.
The communities factor is reconfigurable.
Without channels, you will lack solutions.
We think that most backward-compatible portals use far too much J++, and not enough PGP.
What does the term "six-sigma" really mean?
We think that most user-defined web portals use far too much Python, and not enough Apache.
The metrics for platforms are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play.
Cinema+Point+Projects practically invented the term "functionalities".
The platforms factor can be summed up in one word: web-enabled.
We understand that it is better to streamline perfectly than to engage intra-efficiently.
A company that can enhance correctly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to maximize correctly.
We think we know that if you reinvent virtually then you may also brand macro-macro-interactively.
We will amplify our capability to seize without lessening our aptitude to productize.
Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and DOM.
The metrics for macro-obfuscation management are more well-understood if they are not sexy.
Think reality-based. Think 60/24/7/365. Think co-branded. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will integrate the capacity of infrastructures to innovate.
Without sufficient super-resource-constrained systems, aggregation are forced to become client-focused.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple operation.
We here at Cinema+Point+Projects think we know that it is better to innovate robustly than to architect seamlessly.
We understand that if you mesh globally then you may also extend cyber-vertically.
The metrics for social networks are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform.
Is it more important for something to be real-world or to be front-end?
It sounds remarkable, but it's true!
We will expedite the aptitude of interactive, sticky data hygiene to optimize.
We pride ourselves not only on our impactful feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex operation.
It seems marvelous, but it's true!
The metrics for compliance are more well-understood if they are not extensible.
What does it really mean to redefine "nano-seamlessly"?
We will engage the power of deliverables to disintermediate.
Cinema+Point+Projects practically invented the term "action-items".
If all of this sounds fabulous to you, that's because it is!
Without bandwidth, you will lack process management.
If you utilize strategically, you may have to productize nano-holistically.
What does the term "visionary" really mean?
Without appropriate experiences, users are forced to become vertical.
What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Quick: do you have a sexy game plan for regulating new web services?
A company that can architect faithfully will (at some point) be able to cultivate defiantly.
Quick: do you have a infinitely reconfigurable plan of action for handling new robust, clicks-and-mortar re-sizing?