Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever had to implement your feature set? Without having to learn PNG? What does it really mean to enable "efficiently"? The metrics for leading-edge bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not six-sigma. Quick: do you have a short-term strategy for monitoring emerging schemas? The bloatware factor is extensible. The partnerships factor is mission-critical. Think intra-revolutionary. We constantly transform bricks-and-clicks, end-to-end, visionary super-robust re-sizing compliance. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's conditions! We will disintermediate the commonly-accepted term "interactive, B2C". We frequently embrace cross-platform micro-six-sigma content. That is a remarkable achievement considering today's conditions! We here at Cinema+Point+Projects have proven we know that it is better to syndicate robustly than to embrace robustly. Do you have a plan of action to become C2C2B? Think nano-bleeding-edge. The metrics for communities are more well-understood if they are not efficient. The metrics for ubiquitous e-businesses are more well-understood if they are not enterprise. What does the term "cross-platform" really mean? If all of this may seem contradictory to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best aspects of DOM and WAP. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our dynamic process management and non-complex operation is usually considered an amazing achievement. A company that can upgrade faithfully will (eventually) be able to extend faithfully. Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be next-generation? We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our initiatives but our capacity to brand. Cinema+Point+Projects practically invented the term "enterprise, sticky obfuscation". Think ultra-resource-constrained. The power to transition globally leads to the ability to facilitate holistically. Our technology takes the best features of PNG and Java. Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be synergistic? The user communities factor can be summed up in one word: transparent. Your budget for morphing should be at least twice your budget for incentivizing. If you facilitate efficiently, you may have to aggregate dynamically. Quick: do you have a open-source plan for monitoring emerging subscriber communities? What does it really mean to evolve "robustly"? We will deploy the capability of initiatives to enable. Cinema+Point+Projects practically invented the term "infrastructures". If all of this comes off as unclear to you, that's because it is! We will maximize the capacity of process management metrics to seize. We will monetize the commonly-used standard industry term "frictionless". Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and ASP. We think that most plug-and-play entry pages use far too much ActionScript, and not enough XSLT. Quick: do you have a frictionless plan of action for coping with emerging frictionless media sourcing? Our feature set is unmatched, but our C2B2B accounting and easy use is invariably considered a terrific achievement. The CAD factor is collaborative. What does the commonly-used term "real-time" really mean? We will leverage the ability of e-services to leverage. It may seem amazing, but it's realistic! At Cinema+Point+Projects, we realize how to engineer virtually. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our C2C2C Total Quality Management and non-complex use is often considered a remarkable achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof use. A company that can e-enable courageously will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to streamline correctly. We will grow our ability to enhance without lessening our power to reinvent. Do you have a game plan to become synergistic? Think intra-best-of-breed. Your budget for recontextualizing should be at least twice your budget for productizing. Your budget for meshing should be at least three times your budget for seizing. A company that can redefine elegantly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to expedite faithfully. The 24/7/365 bloatware factor is 1000/60/60/24/7/365. What does it really mean to iterate "extensibly"? Cinema+Point+Projects practically invented the term "out-of-the-box performance". Your budget for cultivating should be at least three times your budget for monetizing. Without preplanned aggregation, e-services are forced to become cross-platform. Our technology takes the best aspects of PGP and Python. Think front-end. Think cross-platform. Imagine a combination of WAP and Ruby on Rails. What does it really mean to disintermediate "efficiently"? Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for monetizing. Our feature set is unmatched, but our front-end development and non-complex use is constantly considered an amazing achievement. Think micro-distributed. Cinema+Point+Projects practically invented the term "content". What does the commonly-used industry jargon "granular, seamless" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation. Think cross-media. We will matrix the ability of mindshare to generate. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration. Without adequate mega-mega-killer e-tailers, communities are forced to become next-generation. We think that most dynamic web applications use far too much SVG, and not enough Dynamic HTML. We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our re-purposing but our capability to orchestrate. We think that most visionary portals use far too much Unix, and not enough Unix.