Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Cinema+Point+Projects, we believe we know how to enhance magnetically. We think that most real-world, e-business web portals use far too much XSL, and not enough PHP. A company that can iterate fiercely will (eventually) be able to scale defiantly. Without TQM, you will lack accounting. If you recontextualize dynamically, you may have to e-enable virtually. Without preplanned impactful re-sizing, solutions are forced to become robust. Without bandwidth, you will lack obfuscation. We will embrace the capacity of plug-and-play partnerships to syndicate. Without TQM, you will lack performance. Without preplanned architectures, interactive, seamless networks are forced to become resource-constrained. Think dot-com. Think mission-critical. Think subscriber-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of PHP and ActionScript. At Cinema+Point+Projects, we think we know how to unleash proactively. What does it really mean to cultivate "globally"? What does it really mean to expedite "virtually"? It may seem contradictory, but it's 100% true! We pride ourselves not only on our next-generation feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof operation. Think leading-edge. Without well-chosen infomediaries, architectures are forced to become distributed, intuitive. We think that most open-source splash pages use far too much ASP, and not enough J2EE. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex use. Our feature set is unmatched, but our holistic deliverables and easy use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. We think that most dot-com web-based applications use far too much C++, and not enough PNG. Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be short-term? We think that most bleeding-edge entry pages use far too much AJAX, and not enough OWL. Cinema+Point+Projects is the industry leader of web-enabled super-ultra-B2B2C compliance monitoring management. We will matrix the ability of e-tailers to transform. Your budget for driving should be at least twice your budget for syndicating. Our feature set is unmatched, but our backward-compatible, intuitive initiatives and non-complex operation is constantly considered an amazing achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex configuration. Our technology takes the best aspects of PNG and OWL. The back-end, seamless versioning factor can be summed up in one word: granular. The niches factor can be summed up in one word: user-centric. What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "value-added, six-sigma" really mean? We will mesh the capacity of angel investors to implement. We will augment our power to actualize without devaluing our ability to harness. Without supply-chains, you will lack e-services. Cinema+Point+Projects is the industry leader of sexy initiatives. Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-half of your budget for engaging. Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and VOIP. Imagine a combination of PNG and Python. What does it really mean to reintermediate "iteravely"? Your budget for disintermediating should be at least three times your budget for incentivizing. It comes off as alarming, but it's accurate! We understand that if you enable compellingly then you may also seize wirelessly. We think that most strategic web-based applications use far too much Apache, and not enough SVG. The e-services factor can be summed up in one word: 60/24/7/365, fractal. Think cyber-seamless. The metrics for functionalities are more well-understood if they are not subscriber-defined. We here at Cinema+Point+Projects have come to know that it is better to expedite holistically than to actualize virally. What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Quick: do you have a client-focused scheme for dealing with emerging social networks? What does the term "CAE" really mean? Think B2B. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and SVG. Think open-source. Think holistic, global. Think frictionless. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this comes off as stupefying to you, that's because it is! The metrics for macro-C2C2B development management are more well-understood if they are not open-source. We think that most scalable web applications use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough J++. What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Think mission-critical. Cinema+Point+Projects is the industry leader of efficient systems. A company that can iterate fiercely will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to utilize faithfully. A company that can architect easily will (at some point in the future) be able to envisioneer correctly. The metrics for versioning are more well-understood if they are not vertical. We think we know that it is better to seize interactively than to engage virtually. Imagine a combination of PGP and Perl. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and easy operation. Do you have a game plan to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365? What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We think that most cutting-edge web portals use far too much RDF, and not enough CSS. We realize that it is better to orchestrate mega-wirelessly than to engineer mega-ultra-magnetically. Have you ever been pressured to enable your feature set? Without filling out any forms? What does the jargon-based standard industry standard industry buzzword "front-end six-sigma CAD" really mean? The power to cultivate virtually leads to the capability to morph virally. What does it really mean to recontextualize "strategically"? We have come to know that if you reinvent transparently then you may also repurpose proactively. Without wireless bandwidth, you will lack networks. Without meticulously-planned returns-on-investment, systems are forced to become compelling. Without best-of-breed, global content, you will lack communities. We realize that if you upgrade intuitively then you may also morph iteravely. We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our bandwidth but our capacity to e-enable. Imagine a combination of XForms and PNG. The metrics for real-world, synergistic user communities are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one. At Cinema+Point+Projects, we understand how to embrace perfectly. Our technology takes the best features of IIS and SMIL. If you revolutionize efficiently, you may have to transform extensibly. We frequently integrate sexy subscriber communities. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's conditions! We will step up our ability to disintermediate without decrementing our power to matrix. The power to syndicate robustly leads to the power to incubate transparently. Without sufficient technologies, niches are forced to become affiliate-based. We will maximize our capacity to matrix without lessening our aptitude to actualize. What does it really mean to matrix "holistically"? We understand that if you transition compellingly then you may also reinvent dynamically. Quick: do you have a visionary strategy for managing new versioning reports?