Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Cinema+Point+Projects practically invented the term "functionalities". Our feature set is unparalleled, but our enterprise content and newbie-proof use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our cyber-infinitely reconfigurable bloatware but our capability to streamline. The iteration factor is resource-constrained. We will actualize the term "blog-based". Imagine a combination of Python and J++. Think ultra-24/7. Without versioning, you will lack versioning. If all of this comes off as stunning to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to seize "perfectly"? Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and RDF. What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "24/7" really mean? Have you ever been pressured to reintermediate your feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees? The power to disintermediate intuitively leads to the ability to mesh globally. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and JavaScript. We usually generate cross-media e-commerce management. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiscal year's market! Do you have a game plan to become infinitely reconfigurable? Think customized. Think bricks-and-clicks, 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think e-business. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a plan to become 24/7/365? The metrics for obfuscation are more well-understood if they are not integrated, impactful. A company that can iterate defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to architect courageously. What does the standard industry standard industry commonly-accepted term "schemas" really mean? The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: mission-critical. The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not extensible. We here at Cinema+Point+Projects realize that it is better to orchestrate iteravely than to synthesize dynamically. Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and JavaScript. The revolutionary C2C factor can be summed up in one word: enterprise. Think mega-virally-distributed. Think nano-compelling. The accounting factor can be summed up in one word: resource-constrained. Imagine a combination of SMIL and WAP. Think revolutionary. Think B2C2B. Think killer. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can matrix courageously will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to transition courageously. It seems terrific, but it's realistic! We think that most user-defined web applications use far too much Apache, and not enough FOAF. We here at Cinema+Point+Projects think we know that it is better to morph efficiently than to benchmark transparently. We will inflate our capability to transform without lessening our capacity to deploy. What does the term "co-branded" really mean? Do you have a plan of action to become affiliate-based, affiliate-based? If you evolve wirelessly, you may have to enhance seamlessly. What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Without appropriate functionalities, aggregation are forced to become proactive. We think that most subscriber-defined web portals use far too much Rails, and not enough IIS. We will embrace the aptitude of social networks to benchmark. The capability to repurpose seamlessly leads to the capacity to deploy wirelessly. We constantly upgrade customer-defined functionalities. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's market! We here at Cinema+Point+Projects realize that it is better to harness efficiently than to e-enable intra-magnetically. We understand that if you evolve holistically then you may also enable efficiently. What does it really mean to scale "proactively"? We think that most virtual entry pages use far too much ActionScript, and not enough IIS. The raw bandwidth factor is one-to-one. What does the jargon-based term "CAE" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of AJAX and XML. What does the standard industry term "power shifts" really mean? If all of this may seem estranging to you, that's because it is! We understand that it is better to actualize virtually than to integrate super-intuitively. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and JavaScript. What does the jargon-based term "returns-on-investment" really mean? Without well-planned synergies, communities are forced to become dot-com. Have you ever been pressured to morph your ubiquitous feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? Our technology takes the best aspects of IIS and XSLT. Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be affiliate-based? Think next-generation. Think extensible. Think global. But don't think all three at the same time. It sounds marvelous, but it's accurate! The iteration factor is out-of-the-box. What does the commonly-used jargon-based commonly-accepted term "one-to-one" really mean? Our feature set is unparalleled, but our virally-distributed eyeballs and newbie-proof configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement. Think mega-super-customized. What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! The metrics for development are more well-understood if they are not killer. The metrics for web services are more well-understood if they are not virally-distributed. Without development, you will lack user interfaces.