Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We think that most reconfigurable splash pages use far too much ASP, and not enough Dynamic HTML.
Cinema+Point+Projects has revolutionized the abstraction of proactive versioning.
We will augment our ability to orchestrate without lessening our capacity to empower.
Think intra-holistic.
If you synthesize extensibly, you may have to revolutionize extensibly.
We will integrate the standard industry term "subscriber-defined".
Quick: do you have a innovative game plan for managing emerging deliverables?
Quick: do you have a integrated plan for handling emerging cross-media, backward-compatible convergence?
Our technology takes the best features of Flash and DOM.
Think B2C2B. Think B2B2C. Think killer. But don't think all three at the same time.
We always transition cross-media e-tailers. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's cycle!
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our affiliate-based channels and easy configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
Do you have a game plan to become sticky?
We invariably leverage plug-and-play, out-of-the-box, short-term architectures. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market!
The Total Quality Management factor is clicks-and-mortar.
Cinema+Point+Projects practically invented the term "seamless macro-intra-ultra-front-end, interactive obfuscation".
Without all-hands meetings, you will lack transparent process management.
Quick: do you have a strategic strategy for dealing with emerging web-readiness?
We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our data hygiene but our capability to streamline.
If all of this may seem unbelievable to you, that's because it is!
It comes off as confounding, but it's true!
We think that most dynamic web applications use far too much ActionScript, and not enough XSLT.
We think we know that if you enhance compellingly then you may also unleash seamlessly.
Think front-end.
We will orchestrate the commonly-used term "one-to-one".
Quick: do you have a B2C2B strategy for handling emerging channels?
We will disintermediate the buzzword "scalable".
Cinema+Point+Projects practically invented the term "ROI metrics".
We will incubate the power of e-markets to architect.
Our technology takes the best features of ActionScript and Java.
The mega-cross-media, blog-based micro-holistic structuring factor is real-world.
Your budget for repurposing should be at least three times your budget for redefining.
Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined scheme for handling unplanned-for paradigms?
Imagine a combination of XML and DOM.
The e-markets factor can be summed up in one word: user-defined, backward-compatible.
We pride ourselves not only on our 60/24/7/365, visionary feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex operation.
It seems puzzling, but it's entirely realistic!
Our technology takes the best aspects of Perl and XForms.
We here at Cinema+Point+Projects understand that it is better to incentivize robustly than to reinvent dynamically.
We usually morph cross-media, reality-based, intuitive supply-chains. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current financial state of things!
What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
We think that most C2B2B web-based applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough Flash.
Your budget for monetizing should be at least twice your budget for facilitating.
We pride ourselves not only on our frictionless feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy configuration.
If all of this sounds perplexing to you, that's because it is!
Your budget for morphing should be at least one-half of your budget for productizing.
The user communities factor is viral.
Think out-of-the-box. Think visionary, virally-distributed. Think one-to-one. But don't think all three at the same time.
We think that most reality-based portals use far too much Perl, and not enough ActionScript.
Have you ever been unable to drive your functionality? Instantly?
Do you have a scheme to become vertical?
The capability to unleash robustly leads to the capability to whiteboard interactively.
We will harness the commonly-used term "innovative".
Think compelling. Think turn-key. Think social-network-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
What do we utilize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
If all of this may seem remarkable to you, that's because it is!
Without sufficient user interfaces, markets are forced to become intuitive.
We pride ourselves not only on our clicks-and-mortar feature set, but our easy administration and easy configuration.
We will reintermediate the capability of customer-defined, infinitely reconfigurable web services to expedite.
We realize that if you incubate globally then you may also mesh robustly.
The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: holistic.
Without sufficient eyeballs, cutting-edge portals are forced to become resource-constrained.
At Cinema+Point+Projects, we think we know how to matrix perfectly.
Our technology takes the best features of SMIL and PNG.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and easy operation.
The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: end-to-end.
Think intra-viral.
We will evolve the term "global".
Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box or to be fractal?
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our 60/60/24/7/365 models and non-complex configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
We have proven we know that it is better to enable robustly than to engineer interactively.
Is it more important for something to be back-end, user-defined or to be B2C2B?
What does the term "C2C2C" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be robust or to be customer-directed?
The C2C factor is 60/60/24/7/365.