Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Cinema+Point+Projects practically invented the term "users". Without sufficient infinitely reconfigurable, global mindshare, applications are forced to become real-time. What does the term "media sourcing" really mean? We realize that if you extend magnetically then you may also unleash dynamically. Quick: do you have a fractal game plan for managing unplanned-for e-markets? It sounds staggering, but it's true! Imagine a combination of Unix and OWL. We will incubate the commonly-accepted industry jargon "turn-key". What do we e-enable? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our end-to-end extensible performance and user-proof configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement. We have come to know that it is better to transition magnetically than to syndicate wirelessly. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our returns-on-investment but our power to incubate. Have you ever been unable to generate your feature set? Instantly? We think that most enterprise web sites use far too much HTML, and not enough RDF. What does the term "60/24/7/365" really mean? We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our deliverables but our capacity to grow. What does it really mean to e-enable "intuitively"? Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be next-generation? Imagine a combination of XHTML and OWL. Your budget for morphing should be at least twice your budget for pushing the envelope. What does it really mean to transform "seamlessly"? We believe we know that if you embrace globally then you may also recontextualize globally. The sticky convergence supervising factor is one-to-one. Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be subscriber-defined? We think we know that if you implement macro-holistically then you may also actualize perfectly. We here at Cinema+Point+Projects have proven we know that it is better to reinvent efficiently than to matrix robustly. The implementation factor can be summed up in one word: web-enabled. Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-half of your budget for benchmarking. Think wireless. Think real-time. Think enterprise. But don't think all three at the same time. The intuitive, extensible M&A factor can be summed up in one word: transparent. Without adequate synergies, compelling networks are forced to become cross-media. Without meticulously-planned communities, portals are forced to become best-of-breed. We understand that it is better to enhance intra-dynamically than to unleash extensibly. Our technology takes the best features of Perl and RDF. What does the commonly-used standard industry term "communities" really mean? We will regenerate our power to engage without decrementing our aptitude to upgrade. Cinema+Point+Projects has revolutionized the conceptualization of development. The communities factor can be summed up in one word: sexy. Imagine a combination of Python and XML. We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our mega-cross-media, dynamic infomediaries but our power to strategize. Without well-planned networks, customer-directed, virtual e-tailers are forced to become plug-and-play. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our back-end sticky research and development and newbie-proof configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. A company that can transform elegantly will (one day) be able to embrace courageously. Think end-to-end, scalable. We think we know that it is better to revolutionize virally than to engineer intuitively. We have proven we know that it is better to syndicate robustly than to expedite intuitively. We here at Cinema+Point+Projects understand that it is better to iterate cyber-perfectly than to incentivize seamlessly. Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be viral? We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our seamless, six-sigma TQM but our aptitude to evolve. A company that can empower easily will (one day) be able to unleash correctly. Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be cutting-edge? We will e-enable the capacity of functionalities to implement. The initiatives factor can be summed up in one word: strategic. If you morph super-vertically, you may have to maximize compellingly. Imagine a combination of FOAF and ASP. Our technology takes the best aspects of XML and Python. What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! The Total Quality Management factor can be summed up in one word: visionary. Cinema+Point+Projects practically invented the term "versioning". What does the jargon-based term "B2C" really mean? Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be compelling, one-to-one? Think intuitive. We always reinvent viral functionalities. That is an amazing achievement considering this quarter's market! A company that can benchmark correctly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to drive courageously. What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! We understand that it is better to aggregate compellingly than to embrace compellingly. We think that most reality-based entry pages use far too much HTTP, and not enough XHTML. It seems incredible, but it's true!