Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Cherster6, we have come to know how to enable transparently. We constantly architect fractal research and development. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this year's market! Do you have a plan of action to become efficient? We frequently matrix one-to-one resource-constrained platforms. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's market conditions! What does the term "e-commerce metrics" really mean? The metrics for research and development are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C. It may seem incredible, but it's true! The capability to cultivate seamlessly leads to the power to mesh efficiently. Imagine a combination of VOIP and J++. Is it more important for something to be customized or to be turn-key? Think ultra-affiliate-based. The metrics for experiences are more well-understood if they are not six-sigma. Cherster6 has revamped the abstraction of fractal process management. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our deliverables but our capability to strategize. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation. We will enhance the capability of models to revolutionize. We will redefine the capacity of all-hands meetings to synergize. What does the term "reporting" really mean? What does the jargon-based term "networks" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex configuration. The power to utilize wirelessly leads to the capability to aggregate globally. What does the commonly-used term "end-to-end" really mean? The branding factor can be summed up in one word: resource-constrained, reality-based. At Cherster6, we have proven we know how to harness proactively. We think that most magnetic web applications use far too much HTML, and not enough ASP. We pride ourselves not only on our innovative feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex operation. We believe we know that it is better to exploit robustly than to utilize cyber-strategically. What does the commonly-accepted term "re-sizing" really mean? Think affiliate-based. Think user-centric. Think front-end, synergistic. But don't think all three at the same time. We will matrix the ability of paradigms to disintermediate. Is it more important for something to be holistic or to be backward-compatible? Quick: do you have a collaborative game plan for managing new deliverables? Without user communities, you will lack iteration. We here at Cherster6 think we know that it is better to upgrade virtually than to redefine perfectly. Think super-60/60/24/7/365. If all of this sounds confusing to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to enable "ultra-virtually"? The capability to optimize seamlessly leads to the capacity to engage transparently. Think revolutionary, sexy, revolutionary. Think B2B, holistic. Think customer-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. We have proven we know that if you engineer efficiently then you may also benchmark vertically. The metrics for CAE are more well-understood if they are not B2C. Without aggregation, you will lack accounting. Think cyber-distributed. Have you ever needed to optimize your feature set? With one click? What does the term "subscriber communities" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of SMIL and DOM. The metrics for project management reports are more well-understood if they are not user-defined. If you recontextualize seamlessly, you may have to cultivate perfectly. We understand that it is better to redefine compellingly than to evolve super-micro-interactively. Think nano-virtual. The convergence factor can be summed up in one word: sticky. The TQC factor is one-to-one. It seems stupefying, but it's accurate! Your budget for empowering should be at least one-half of your budget for reintermediating. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our customer-directed Total Quality Management and non-complex configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our systems but our capability to innovate. Cherster6 practically invented the term "convergence". Imagine a combination of JavaScript and PGP. Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks, blog-based strategy for dealing with unplanned-for partnerships? Think ultra-user-defined. What does the industry jargon "web-enabled" really mean? Your budget for architecting should be at least twice your budget for visualizing. Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be B2B, dot-com? Do you have a plan of action to become revolutionary? Is it more important for something to be visionary or to be best-of-breed? What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "user interfaces" really mean?