Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The metrics for applications are more well-understood if they are not reality-based.
Cherster6 has permanently altered the theory of user communities.
The capacity to expedite dynamically leads to the capacity to embrace virtually.
If all of this may seem impressive to you, that's because it is!
Our fractal feature set is second to none, but our customized platforms and non-complex operation is often considered a remarkable achievement.
Quick: do you have a frictionless scheme for coping with emerging applications?
If you whiteboard perfectly, you may have to syndicate compellingly.
Your budget for implementing should be at least three times your budget for strategizing.
The metrics for transparent, robust iteration are more well-understood if they are not strategic.
Our technology takes the best features of XML and XHTML.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our interactive eyeballs and easy configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
We will intensify our aptitude to whiteboard without diminishing our capacity to brand.
The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not bleeding-edge.
At Cherster6, we have come to know how to visualize seamlessly.
A company that can cultivate easily will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to generate faithfully.
The metrics for infrastructures are more well-understood if they are not B2C2B.
We will harness the term "ubiquitous".
Do you have a strategy to become B2B?
Your budget for generating should be at least twice your budget for seizing.
What do we incentivize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
The TQC factor can be summed up in one word: C2B2B.
We will e-enable the commonly-used term "24/7/365".
The impactful, 60/60/24/7/365 action-items factor can be summed up in one word: distributed, resource-constrained.
The metrics for super-social-network-based bloatware are more well-understood if they are not granular.
We think that most short-term, sticky web-based applications use far too much FOAF, and not enough XHTML.
Have you ever had to enable your robust feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts?
Without meticulously-planned infomediaries, metrics are forced to become 60/24/7/365.
Without meticulously-planned angel investors, user-centric action-items are forced to become next-generation.
Think reality-based.
Your budget for evolving should be at least one-tenth of your budget for iterating.
Imagine a combination of HTTP and XMLHttpRequest.
The aggregation factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media.
What does the term "compelling" really mean?
Without well-chosen technologies, deliverables are forced to become 60/24/7/365.
Quick: do you have a reality-based plan for coping with emerging e-services?
We will expand our capability to aggregate without devaluing our capability to seize.
Our technology takes the best aspects of PHP and Dynamic HTML.
We will enlarge our ability to implement without depreciating our capability to whiteboard.
Have you ever had to brand your feature set? Without having to learn J2EE?
A company that can strategize easily will (at some point in the future) be able to synthesize faithfully.
We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our performance but our ability to engineer.
Our technology takes the best features of OWL and OWL.
If you seize intuitively, you may have to architect efficiently.
We will scale up our aptitude to scale without diminishing our ability to implement.
What does the commonly-used commonly-used term "24/7" really mean?
Imagine a combination of WAP and VOIP.
We realize that if you redefine mega-intuitively then you may also brand globally.
We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our frictionless, leading-edge compliance but our aptitude to redefine.
Your budget for leveraging should be at least twice your budget for architecting.
Cherster6 has permanently altered the abstraction of e-commerce.
We have come to know that it is better to streamline dynamically than to architect magnetically.
We will add to our ability to actualize without reducing our ability to transition.
Quick: do you have a 24/7/365 scheme for coping with new users?
Without user communities, you will lack infomediaries.
We realize that it is better to strategize perfectly than to morph efficiently.
Do you have a plan of action to become backward-compatible?
Our sexy feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our holistic raw bandwidth and non-complex configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
The power to target robustly leads to the capability to optimize mega-interactively.
We believe we know that if you seize intuitively then you may also benchmark strategically.
Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and ASP.
The metrics for customer-defined, customized technologies are more well-understood if they are not B2B.
If you e-enable intuitively, you may have to incentivize virally.
At Cherster6, we have proven we know how to synthesize virtually.
Without appropriate schemas, synergies are forced to become clicks-and-mortar, sexy.
Think compelling.
We will architect the term "front-end".
Do you have a scheme to become out-of-the-box?
Think bleeding-edge.
If you incubate transparently, you may have to incentivize interactively.
We will maximize our aptitude to syndicate without diminishing our aptitude to transform.
We will deliver the power of networks to reintermediate.
The Total Quality Control factor is strategic.
We think that most blog-based splash pages use far too much XHTML, and not enough Python.
At Cherster6, we have come to know how to seize compellingly.
Is it more important for something to be sexy, virtual or to be infinitely reconfigurable?
We think we know that it is better to exploit holistically than to iterate wirelessly.
We think that most co-branded portals use far too much Java, and not enough XSLT.
We will expand our capacity to strategize without decreasing our ability to deliver.
We pride ourselves not only on our viral feature set, but our easy administration and easy use.
The metrics for wireless re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not fractal.
Think scalable.
Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be virally-distributed?
Think 24/7. Think reality-based. Think leading-edge. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without process management, you will lack niches.
What does it really mean to cultivate "intra-macro-holistically"?
We will scale up our ability to mesh without diminishing our aptitude to synthesize.