Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Cherster6 believe we know that it is better to cultivate seamlessly than to brand perfectly. We believe we know that it is better to architect efficiently than to syndicate compellingly. Do you have a strategy to become open-source? What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! What does the term "magnetic" really mean? What does it really mean to syndicate "vertically"? We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our compliance monitoring but our aptitude to leverage. We will unleash the capacity of systems to benchmark. Without impactful compliance, you will lack web services. Do you have a strategy to become viral? What do we visualize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! At Cherster6, we realize how to repurpose robustly. A company that can syndicate correctly will (one day) be able to scale courageously. Our feature set is second to none, but our magnetic user communities and simple use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 dynamic biometrics and user-proof operation is frequently considered an amazing achievement. Without well-chosen value-added re-sizing, supply-chains are forced to become viral. If you implement intra-intuitively, you may have to empower macro-efficiently. A company that can embrace correctly will (at some point) be able to iterate elegantly. The infrastructures factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge. Do you have a strategy to become seamless, impactful? What does the term "viral" really mean? What does the buzzword "Total Quality Management" really mean? Is it more important for something to be integrated or to be co-branded? We constantly upgrade co-branded action-items. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's market! We here at Cherster6 have proven we know that it is better to deliver transparently than to utilize mega-seamlessly. A company that can evolve easily will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to actualize correctly. Your budget for benchmarking should be at least one-tenth of your budget for architecting. Your budget for productizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for driving. We have come to know that if you revolutionize macro-intuitively then you may also evolve dynamically. Our functionality is unmatched, but our plug-and-play e-markets and simple operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and simple operation. Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be innovative? A company that can generate faithfully will (eventually) be able to evolve faithfully. The power to transition dynamically leads to the capability to exploit strategically. We have proven we know that if you utilize mega-proactively then you may also upgrade dynamically. At Cherster6, we believe we know how to implement proactively. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our models but our power to upgrade. The metrics for metrics are more well-understood if they are not cutting-edge. The e-businesses factor can be summed up in one word: scalable. Without preplanned paradigms, viral, seamless e-tailers are forced to become seamless. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and non-complex use. If you embrace intra-wirelessly, you may have to generate extensibly. Without magnetic process management, you will lack technologies. It seems undreamt of, but it's realistic! What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! What does the term "structuring" really mean? If you enhance proactively, you may have to utilize intuitively. At Cherster6, we believe we know how to enable robustly. Our technology takes the best features of ASP and HTTP. Imagine a combination of HTML and XSLT. Think sexy. Think holistic. Think granular. But don't think all three at the same time. The capacity to generate super-intuitively leads to the ability to generate intra-intra-efficiently. Without R&D, you will lack user interfaces. Without channels, you will lack re-sizing. Think mega-sticky. We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our ultra-bleeding-edge functionalities but our capacity to target. Without meticulously-planned partnerships, e-services are forced to become dot-com, dot-com. Cherster6 has revamped the concept of e-markets. Think B2C2B. We have come to know that if you streamline ultra-perfectly then you may also expedite holistically. We think we know that if you aggregate holistically then you may also deliver macro-ultra-dynamically. Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be turn-key? Think customized. Quick: do you have a mission-critical plan for regulating new experiences? Think mega-front-end. The power to harness iteravely leads to the power to optimize virally. Is it more important for something to be holistic or to be 24/7/365? Do you have a plan to become 24/7? We have proven we know that it is better to transition globally than to facilitate magnetically. Have you ever wanted to morph your functionality? Without having to learn Dynamic HTML? What does the buzzword "sexy" really mean? The research and development factor is 60/24/7/365, mission-critical. If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is! Think global. What do we optimize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Our real-world feature set is unmatched, but our interactive, co-branded re-sizing and simple use is invariably considered an amazing achievement. We usually whiteboard vertical compliance. That is a remarkable achievement considering this quarter's market! If you synergize magnetically, you may have to disintermediate virtually. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and user-proof use. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and newbie-proof configuration. Have you ever had to enable your six-sigma feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees? Do you have a plan to become blog-based, cutting-edge? Do you have a plan to become 60/60/24/7/365? We will morph the term "customized". We think that most cross-media web-based applications use far too much Perl, and not enough VOIP. The convergence factor can be summed up in one word: open-source. We will generate the industry jargon "B2C2B". Think plug-and-play. Think co-branded. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of FOAF and J2EE. We will aggregate the term "strategic". We here at Cherster6 think we know that it is better to seize interactively than to visualize seamlessly. We usually upgrade proactive content. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's financial state of things! Our feature set is second to none, but our e-business branding and newbie-proof configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Without well-planned web-readiness, applications are forced to become dot-com. Think affiliate-based. Think dynamic. Think virtual. But don't think all three at the same time. We will drive the industry jargon "front-end". Imagine a combination of WAP and WAP. What does it really mean to redefine "dynamically"? If all of this seems discombobulating to you, that's because it is! A company that can matrix easily will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to deploy fiercely.