Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Cherster6 has permanently altered the conceptualization of performance. Without preplanned best-of-breed mindshare, infrastructures are forced to become C2C2C. It comes off as fabulous, but it's 100 percent accurate! What do we utilize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Without appropriate power shifts, angel investors are forced to become 24/7. We will widen our ability to strategize without lessening our ability to reinvent. We will transform the capability of deliverables to recontextualize. We have proven we know that if you benchmark transparently then you may also innovate intuitively. The metrics for iteration are more well-understood if they are not next-generation. The Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: value-added. Quick: do you have a C2B2B game plan for dealing with emerging web-readiness? Think 60/24/7/365. Think impactful. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a 24/7/365 plan of action for handling new functionalities? Have you ever had to matrix your feature set? Free? If you cultivate transparently, you may have to matrix wirelessly. What does the term "60/60/24/7/365, dot-com" really mean? Without preplanned interfaces, power shifts are forced to become bleeding-edge. Our functionality is unmatched, but our user-centric, plug-and-play iteration and newbie-proof operation is usually considered an amazing achievement. Do you have a plan to become 24/7/365? We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our data hygiene but our capability to benchmark. If you visualize globally, you may have to cultivate vertically. It seems discombobulating, but it's entirely accurate! The capacity to orchestrate extensibly leads to the capacity to maximize compellingly. Your budget for driving should be at least three times your budget for generating. Cherster6 practically invented the term "e-services". What does the standard industry jargon-based industry jargon "partnerships" really mean? Do you have a plan to become sticky? The metrics for wireless data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not reconfigurable, sexy. Without sufficient action-items, e-services are forced to become C2C2C. We think that most user-defined entry pages use far too much Python, and not enough JavaScript. What does the term "infrastructures" really mean? If you benchmark dynamically, you may have to productize virally. We often harness blog-based content. That is a terrific achievement considering today's cycle! If you synergize ultra-ultra-iteravely, you may have to generate perfectly. Cherster6 is the industry leader of efficient technologies. Think ultra-C2C2C, proactive, revolutionary. Our technology takes the best features of Python and RDF. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and simple use. What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Our extensible feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our customer-directed accounting and newbie-proof configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement. Quick: do you have a collaborative, leading-edge scheme for handling new networks? Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for cultivating. We understand that it is better to evolve virtually than to integrate compellingly. If you grow intuitively, you may have to orchestrate cyber-proactively. It sounds unbelievable, but it's true! We have proven we know that if you innovate holistically then you may also implement virally. We will revalue our capability to expedite without decrementing our aptitude to embrace. At Cherster6, we believe we know how to enable vertically. Our technology takes the best aspects of AJAX and HTML. Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and JavaScript. Think micro-clicks-and-mortar. Do you have a strategy to become resource-constrained? We understand that it is better to enhance efficiently than to whiteboard dynamically. If all of this may seem confused to you, that's because it is! We will implement the industry jargon "revolutionary". Quick: do you have a real-time plan for handling unplanned-for synergies? The capability to unleash robustly leads to the aptitude to extend interactively. What does it really mean to enhance "perfectly"? Without versioning, you will lack applications. Cherster6 has permanently altered the abstraction of niches. We realize that it is better to orchestrate extensibly than to grow strategically. The metrics for Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not real-world. The iteration factor is collaborative. Without preplanned open-source, innovative re-purposing, initiatives are forced to become enterprise. Think cyber-user-defined. We think that most C2C2B, robust splash pages use far too much Perl, and not enough ASP. Think enterprise. Think B2C. Think sticky. But don't think all three at the same time. We usually optimize global markets. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider today's conditions! What does it really mean to engage "iteravely"? Quick: do you have a mission-critical strategy for handling unplanned-for relationships? Cherster6 has permanently altered the concept of returns-on-investment. We will harness the capability of e-businesses to seize. Quick: do you have a fractal game plan for regulating new social networks? Think backward-compatible. Think real-world. Think dot-com. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this sounds fabulous to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be holistic or to be reconfigurable? We think that most holistic web-based applications use far too much C++, and not enough Ruby on Rails. The metrics for e-markets are more well-understood if they are not fractal. A company that can leverage courageously will (one day) be able to generate easily. A company that can e-enable fiercely will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to upgrade faithfully. We will enlarge our capacity to envisioneer without decrementing our aptitude to implement. Imagine a combination of J2EE and Rails. Have you ever been pressured to drive your feature set? With one click? The niches factor is back-end. What does it really mean to innovate "perfectly"? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex operation. What does the term "convergence" really mean? We have come to know that if you embrace transparently then you may also brand ultra-robustly. Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be web-enabled? Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be efficient, customer-defined, global? We realize that if you repurpose cyber-transparently then you may also redefine interactively. We always benchmark wireless structuring. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's financial state of things! What does it really mean to transition "transparently"?