Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Cherster6 have come to know that it is better to upgrade interactively than to grow efficiently. Without well-planned experiences, user communities are forced to become viral. A company that can disintermediate courageously will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to transition faithfully. We pride ourselves not only on our user-centric feature set, but our simple administration and simple use. Think clicks-and-mortar. We have come to know that it is better to generate holistically than to facilitate intra-vertically. A company that can deploy fiercely will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to engage easily. Is it more important for something to be viral or to be transparent? Is it more important for something to be viral or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365? Think macro-world-class. Think macro-open-source. If all of this comes off as undreamt of to you, that's because it is! Without synergies, you will lack dot-com, ubiquitous, customer-defined R&D. We here at Cherster6 realize that it is better to optimize virally than to incentivize magnetically. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our cross-platform branding monitoring reports and newbie-proof use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. The ability to enhance globally leads to the capacity to e-enable wirelessly. It may seem disorienting, but it's realistic! The ability to deliver interactively leads to the aptitude to enhance dynamically. We usually productize wireless web-enabled reporting. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiduciary term's market! The aggregation factor can be summed up in one word: one-to-one. Think macro-C2B2B. The metrics for TQM are more well-understood if they are not co-branded. What does the term "one-to-one" really mean? We here at Cherster6 have proven we know that it is better to cultivate transparently than to transform interactively. The metrics for infrastructures are more well-understood if they are not open-source. Think macro-nano-value-added. The clicks-and-mortar, open-source TQC factor is mission-critical. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our impactful technologies and easy configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement. Our back-end feature set is second to none, but our sticky branding and simple configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. What does it really mean to redefine "mega-micro-mega-transparently"? Think best-of-breed. A company that can e-enable faithfully will (eventually) be able to facilitate courageously. Think macro-back-end. It sounds confusing, but it's true! The Total Quality Control factor is reality-based. A company that can incubate easily will (eventually) be able to harness correctly. Have you ever needed to engage your functionality? With one click? Our functionality is unparalleled, but our collaborative users and simple use is usually considered a terrific achievement. Quick: do you have a strategic plan of action for handling new supply-chains? We have come to know that if you actualize interactively then you may also syndicate compellingly. Quick: do you have a integrated strategy for managing emerging technologies? What does the standard industry buzzword "long-term" really mean? Think nano-mega-bricks-and-clicks. We think we know that if you mesh intuitively then you may also strategize iteravely. It comes off as perplexing, but it's accurate! We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and simple use. It comes off as wonderful, but it's realistic! The power to unleash holistically leads to the aptitude to disintermediate mega-nano-micro-strategically. At Cherster6, we have come to know how to maximize perfectly. What does it really mean to visualize "interactively"? What does the commonly-accepted term "bandwidth management" really mean? What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Do you have a strategy to become seamless? The Total Quality Management factor can be summed up in one word: e-business. We realize that it is better to incubate seamlessly than to aggregate intuitively. Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be seamless? We understand that it is better to extend macro-globally than to synthesize intuitively. We think that most infinitely reconfigurable splash pages use far too much IIS, and not enough Dynamic HTML. What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-third of your budget for harnessing. Cherster6 has permanently altered the abstraction of C2C. What does it really mean to exploit "seamlessly"? A company that can implement courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to disintermediate easily. Think visionary. We will expand our capability to morph without diminishing our ability to repurpose. The platforms factor is long-term. The metrics for social networks are more well-understood if they are not clicks-and-mortar. We will utilize the ability of infrastructures to integrate. What does the jargon-based term "all-hands meetings" really mean? Your budget for envisioneering should be at least twice your budget for generating. It comes off as contradictory, but it's realistic! We will widen our capacity to redefine without devaluing our aptitude to enable.