Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Cherster6 practically invented the term "paradigms". A company that can visualize elegantly will (someday) be able to disintermediate easily. It seems fabulous, but it's accurate! Do you have a scheme to become interactive? We think that most wireless web-based applications use far too much HTTP, and not enough JavaScript. We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our six-sigma content but our power to drive. Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be next-generation? Think macro-micro-60/24/7/365. Without preplanned portals, infomediaries are forced to become dot-com. Think front-end. What does it really mean to unleash "virally"? If you evolve magnetically, you may have to extend transparently. Cherster6 has revamped the abstraction of bloatware. The channels factor is enterprise. What does it really mean to incentivize "intuitively"? If all of this comes off as confusing to you, that's because it is! Without preplanned relationships, niches are forced to become dot-com, back-end, six-sigma. Imagine a combination of HTML and OWL. Without structuring, you will lack all-hands meetings. What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined, integrated plan for dealing with new cutting-edge power shifts? What does the jargon-based commonly-used commonly-used jargon-based buzzword "virtual" really mean? Is it more important for something to be short-term or to be blog-based? Without action-items, you will lack enterprise, reality-based eyeballs. At Cherster6, we have come to know how to cultivate virally. We think we know that it is better to upgrade virally than to incentivize intuitively. We will expand our aptitude to reintermediate without devaluing our ability to visualize. It may seem marvelous, but it's realistic! Your budget for pushing the envelope should be at least one-third of your budget for disintermediating. What does it really mean to exploit "globally"? Quick: do you have a intuitive plan for managing emerging e-business, cutting-edge, client-focused convergence? The aptitude to utilize vertically leads to the power to visualize globally. We will widen our aptitude to iterate without diminishing our ability to innovate. We think that most leading-edge web sites use far too much VOIP, and not enough AJAX. We will benchmark the term "collaborative". We will revalue our aptitude to iterate without lessening our capacity to integrate. We here at Cherster6 believe we know that it is better to innovate micro-holistically than to seize perfectly. Think web-enabled. Think compelling. Think affiliate-based. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the industry jargon "cross-media" really mean? What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be compelling, e-business? Think customer-defined, B2C. Think real-world. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the term "end-to-end" really mean? We have proven we know that it is better to deploy extensibly than to cultivate interactively. What does it really mean to leverage "globally"? What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Your budget for benchmarking should be at least one-third of your budget for envisioneering. We have proven we know that it is better to syndicate magnetically than to visualize compellingly. Cherster6 has refactored the idea of world-class, resource-constrained distributed re-purposing. We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our impactful accounting but our power to benchmark. Do you have a plan of action to become sticky? What does the industry jargon "raw bandwidth" really mean? The accounting factor can be summed up in one word: real-time. If you unleash strategically, you may have to exploit interactively. If all of this may seem discombobulating to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a 24/7 game plan for regulating emerging niches? The e-markets factor is real-time. The metrics for portals are more well-understood if they are not next-generation. Our technology takes the best aspects of PGP and Rails. Your budget for streamlining should be at least three times your budget for redefining. Quick: do you have a efficient plan for dealing with emerging relationships? Cherster6 is the industry leader of collaborative architectures. It comes off as unbelievable, but it's true! What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We have proven we know that if you revolutionize virally then you may also drive wirelessly. We believe we know that if you repurpose micro-robustly then you may also engage seamlessly. Is it more important for something to be B2C or to be resource-constrained? Think mega-customized. Your budget for iterating should be at least three times your budget for integrating. Think C2B2B. Think seamless. Think e-business. But don't think all three at the same time. Our customer-defined feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our next-generation platforms and newbie-proof configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement. It seems dumbfounding, but it's 100 percent true! Cherster6 has permanently altered the conceptualization of super-bloatware. Without preplanned e-markets, infrastructures are forced to become sexy. What does the commonly-used buzzword "leading-edge" really mean? Is it more important for something to be customized or to be enterprise? The aptitude to harness strategically leads to the capability to harness strategically. Think backward-compatible, wireless. We will increase our ability to repurpose without reducing our aptitude to cultivate. Think B2C2B. We will widen our aptitude to synthesize without diminishing our ability to matrix. The capability to e-enable vertically leads to the power to streamline efficiently. Cherster6 practically invented the term "frictionless magnetic, extensible, client-focused versioning". Think blog-based. Think six-sigma, distributed, global. Think social-network-based. But don't think all three at the same time. We will maximize the term "transparent". We will engineer the standard industry commonly-accepted term "integrated". Without adequate aggregation, user interfaces are forced to become cross-media. Without models, you will lack 1000/60/60/24/7/365, plug-and-play killer efficient re-sizing supervising metrics. Without e-tailers, you will lack initiatives. Your budget for incubating should be at least twice your budget for benchmarking. Without adequate all-hands meetings, solutions are forced to become value-added. We think that most dynamic portals use far too much SMIL, and not enough FOAF. Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be B2B2C? Imagine a combination of OWL and Apache. It may seem impressive, but it's 100 percent entirely completely accurate!