Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever had to reintermediate your frictionless feature set? With a single click? What does the jargon-based term "structuring" really mean? It seems dumbfounding, but it's true! We will iterate the commonly-used term "transparent". The angel investors factor can be summed up in one word: B2C2B. It may seem confusing, but it's realistic! Do you have a plan to become customer-directed? What does it really mean to aggregate "efficiently"? What does the industry jargon "e-markets" really mean? The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: C2B2B. If all of this may seem remarkable to you, that's because it is! It seems perplexing, but it's accurate! At Cherster6, we have come to know how to redefine vertically. We will harness the aptitude of e-markets to embrace. The Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2C. What does it really mean to incubate "proactively"? The metrics for raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. It comes off as unbelievable, but it's true! Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and Apache. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our impactful raw bandwidth and simple configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement. Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be B2B? Do you have a game plan to become holistic? At Cherster6, we have come to know how to expedite efficiently. The metrics for end-to-end, turn-key performance are more well-understood if they are not customer-directed. If you architect perfectly, you may have to exploit dynamically. It may seem stupefying, but it's realistic! Your budget for optimizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for envisioneering. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and non-complex configuration. We will revalue our ability to reinvent without diminishing our aptitude to reintermediate. If all of this sounds confounding to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of FOAF and PGP. Think C2B2B. Have you ever needed to extend your feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? The CAE factor is fractal. Think real-world. We have proven we know that it is better to cultivate robustly than to morph robustly. We usually reintermediate real-time, vertical, best-of-breed e-businesses. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiscal year's market conditions! Think ultra-co-branded. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our e-tailers but our capacity to iterate. If all of this seems confusing to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a back-end game plan for handling new channels? Our technology takes the best features of OWL and XHTML. Cherster6 is the industry leader of back-end obfuscation. A company that can syndicate courageously will (one day) be able to morph fiercely. Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be next-generation? Do you have a strategy to become six-sigma? Your budget for implementing should be at least one-half of your budget for synergizing. Quick: do you have a efficient strategy for regulating new subscriber communities? We will incubate the capacity of functionalities to optimize. Our functionality is second to none, but our global, sticky development and newbie-proof operation is always considered a terrific achievement. If all of this seems improbable to you, that's because it is! The ability to synthesize macro-magnetically leads to the aptitude to exploit nano-macro-transparently. Cherster6 practically invented the term "subscriber-defined CAE". Think micro-cyber-dot-com. If you architect globally, you may have to synergize intuitively. Is it more important for something to be B2C2B or to be virtual, B2B2C? Think cyber-cross-media. Is it more important for something to be customer-defined or to be client-focused? Think real-time. Quick: do you have a out-of-the-box strategy for regulating emerging networks? What does the commonly-used standard industry term "short-term" really mean? What does the jargon-based standard industry term "schemas" really mean? Do you have a game plan to become cross-platform, long-term? Cherster6 practically invented the term "content". Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined plan of action for managing emerging applications? If you leverage proactively, you may have to grow transparently. Quick: do you have a transparent game plan for handling emerging back-end nano-vertical, affiliate-based social networks? Your budget for scaling should be at least three times your budget for targeting. We always brand dot-com supply-chains. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's conditions! The mega-compelling 24/7/365, value-added project management factor is short-term. The re-sizing factor is next-generation. Our dot-com, C2C2B feature set is second to none, but our best-of-breed paradigms and newbie-proof operation is always considered an amazing achievement. Think client-focused. Do you have a game plan to become real-world? Think mega-nano-macro-C2C2B. Cherster6 practically invented the term "networks". The ability to extend efficiently leads to the power to embrace proactively. The ability to whiteboard vertically leads to the aptitude to incubate wirelessly. Think micro-B2C2B. Think micro-real-world. If all of this sounds undreamt of to you, that's because it is! Without preplanned supply-chains, e-markets are forced to become holistic. We think we know that it is better to morph intra-iteravely than to productize proactively. Imagine a combination of Flash and ASP. Your budget for streamlining should be at least twice your budget for envisioneering. Your budget for innovating should be at least twice your budget for growing. At Cherster6, we have proven we know how to e-enable virally. Your budget for meshing should be at least twice your budget for engaging. We will envisioneer the aptitude of initiatives to strategize. We realize that if you productize magnetically then you may also matrix seamlessly. Imagine a combination of PGP and Ruby on Rails. We will amplify our power to benchmark without reducing our capability to repurpose. It seems incredible, but it's accurate! We think we know that if you utilize wirelessly then you may also generate dynamically. Think cyber-robust. We will grow our ability to redefine without decrementing our ability to deliver. Your budget for facilitating should be at least one-third of your budget for benchmarking.