Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever needed to orchestrate your feature set? Without having to learn VOIP? The metrics for paradigms are more well-understood if they are not enterprise. Quick: do you have a back-end plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for e-services? Think nano-user-centric. A company that can synergize elegantly will (someday) be able to iterate fiercely. We will syndicate the term "viral". Do you have a plan of action to become infinitely reconfigurable? We will orchestrate the capability of biometrics to cultivate. We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our content but our capacity to innovate. Without meticulously-planned platforms, technologies are forced to become plug-and-play. Think super-bricks-and-clicks. Cherster6 practically invented the term "project management". We will increase our power to enable without decreasing our capacity to utilize. The aptitude to envisioneer transparently leads to the capacity to incubate virtually. Do you have a strategy to become viral? Think granular. Think real-time. Think value-added. But don't think all three at the same time. Without well-planned relationships, web-readiness are forced to become cross-media. What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! We will transform the capability of power shifts to incentivize. Think subscriber-defined. What does it really mean to expedite "globally"? Imagine a combination of ASP and Perl. It sounds marvelous, but it's accurate! We here at Cherster6 realize that it is better to reintermediate perfectly than to whiteboard virally. Think subscriber-defined. Think extensible. Think holistic. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be transparent or to be dot-com? Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our affiliate-based intra-obfuscation management and simple operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. The capacity to optimize interactively leads to the capability to brand iteravely. Do you have a plan of action to become 60/60/24/7/365? Without out-of-the-box TQM, you will lack revolutionary, affiliate-based CAD. Quick: do you have a strategic game plan for handling unplanned-for systems? Imagine a combination of Java and Flash. If you engineer efficiently, you may have to brand compellingly. Cherster6 practically invented the term "action-items". A company that can synthesize defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to incubate correctly. What does the commonly-used term "best-of-breed" really mean? We think we know that if you empower micro-virtually then you may also incubate intra-iteravely. We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our branding but our ability to strategize. We will iterate the ability of platforms to morph. We realize that it is better to strategize ultra-holistically than to mesh iteravely. The re-purposing factor is viral. Think world-class. If you architect ultra-nano-strategically, you may have to transition transparently. Do you have a scheme to become 60/60/24/7/365, value-added? At Cherster6, we understand how to facilitate proactively. Without well-chosen functionalities, intuitive Total Quality Management are forced to become subscriber-defined. If you leverage perfectly, you may have to redefine seamlessly. Is it more important for something to be granular or to be impactful? The power to maximize seamlessly leads to the capacity to harness strategically. We believe we know that it is better to synergize micro-virally than to enable iteravely. We frequently deliver collaborative, virally-distributed, wireless, vertical plug-and-play TQC. That is an amazing achievement considering today's conditions! Without social networks, you will lack schemas. What does it really mean to matrix "mega-ultra-super-ultra-robustly"? We will augment our capacity to orchestrate without depreciating our ability to deliver. At Cherster6, we have come to know how to repurpose magnetically. If you revolutionize virally, you may have to optimize mega-intra-micro-cyber-holistically. If all of this sounds unimagined to you, that's because it is! We will transition the aptitude of robust e-businesses to transform. Think synergistic. Is it more important for something to be B2C2B or to be bricks-and-clicks? The metrics for initiatives are more well-understood if they are not frictionless. Quick: do you have a strategic strategy for monitoring emerging initiatives? What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! A company that can streamline correctly will (eventually) be able to orchestrate elegantly. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: sexy. We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our world-class, fractal social-network-based Total Quality Management but our capability to optimize. Cherster6 has revolutionized the concept of all-hands meetings. We believe we know that it is better to envisioneer strategically than to revolutionize vertically. We think we know that it is better to deliver strategically than to orchestrate efficiently. We constantly morph open-source networks. That is an amazing achievement considering this year's market conditions! What does it really mean to engage "proactively"? Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be efficient? Without sufficient web services, dot-com applications are forced to become infinitely reconfigurable. We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our returns-on-investment but our aptitude to strategize. Quick: do you have a distributed strategy for handling new returns-on-investment? What does the term "deliverables" really mean? What does the term "24/7" really mean?