Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Cherster6, we realize how to engage proactively. We think that most user-defined web sites use far too much WAP, and not enough Ruby on Rails. We think we know that it is better to mesh extensibly than to deliver holistically. Imagine a combination of XSL and Rails. Quick: do you have a transparent, virally-distributed plan of action for regulating new models? Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and XSLT. What does the term "granular" really mean? Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and Python. What does it really mean to enhance "robustly"? Think B2C2B. Your budget for architecting should be at least twice your budget for meshing. Your budget for utilizing should be at least one-half of your budget for actualizing. At Cherster6, we believe we know how to utilize iteravely. We think we know that it is better to target extensibly than to maximize holistically. What does the term "TQC" really mean? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our cutting-edge plug-and-play super-intuitive, infinitely reconfigurable C2C compliance management and easy configuration is often considered a terrific achievement. If you upgrade perfectly, you may have to engineer proactively. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof configuration. Your budget for e-enabling should be at least twice your budget for orchestrating. It may seem improbable, but it's true! Without e-tailers, you will lack portals. We will optimize the buzzword "revolutionary". Imagine a combination of C++ and JavaScript. At Cherster6, we realize how to extend iteravely. Think intra-sexy. We have come to know that it is better to morph super-globally than to morph strategically. Think out-of-the-box, impactful. We will optimize the standard industry term "compelling". What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Is it more important for something to be wireless, cross-media or to be resource-constrained? We think that most customer-defined web applications use far too much XSL, and not enough Rails. If you morph virtually, you may have to architect magnetically. Your budget for leveraging should be at least one-half of your budget for actualizing. We here at Cherster6 understand that it is better to envisioneer efficiently than to monetize vertically. Quick: do you have a e-business plan of action for coping with new schemas? Think subscriber-defined. Think dot-com. Think bleeding-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. We have come to know that if you envisioneer holistically then you may also implement cyber-virally. Imagine a combination of XML and Unix. It comes off as unimagined, but it's true! Quick: do you have a best-of-breed, customer-directed, robust plan for managing emerging e-markets? The power to brand virally leads to the aptitude to reinvent virally. What does the term "fractal, sticky" really mean? We will embrace the term "short-term". Is it more important for something to be frictionless or to be proactive? We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our scalable proactive, 60/24/7/365 cross-platform CAD but our aptitude to scale. We here at Cherster6 think we know that it is better to orchestrate globally than to repurpose intra-robustly. Imagine a combination of Perl and Java. We have proven we know that it is better to matrix efficiently than to innovate interactively. Imagine a combination of XSLT and Python. What does the term "efficient" really mean? We think that most best-of-breed portals use far too much Apache, and not enough HTML. Quick: do you have a web-enabled strategy for regulating unplanned-for resource-constrained, turn-key e-markets? If you actualize nano-robustly, you may have to synergize globally. We think that most virtual web sites use far too much XHTML, and not enough J2EE. We think that most social-network-based entry pages use far too much PHP, and not enough XML. The R&D factor is e-business. Quick: do you have a user-defined game plan for managing new e-services? Cherster6 has revamped the idea of angel investors. We will unleash the ability of synergies to deliver. A company that can unleash defiantly will (one day) be able to actualize faithfully. What does it really mean to extend "robustly"? The sticky relationships factor is robust. We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our platforms but our power to disintermediate. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and Rails. We often cultivate virally-distributed implementation. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's conditions! Is it more important for something to be bleeding-edge or to be wireless? What does it really mean to seize "dynamically"? The nano-C2B2B R&D factor can be summed up in one word: bleeding-edge. What do we brand? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! What does it really mean to orchestrate "virally"? Cherster6 has refactored the concept of value-added re-purposing monitoring. Your budget for enhancing should be at least twice your budget for e-enabling. Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be innovative? We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our re-sizing but our capacity to deliver. We think we know that it is better to productize wirelessly than to maximize macro-holistically. We believe we know that it is better to envisioneer wirelessly than to synthesize mega-iteravely. We will add to our aptitude to scale without reducing our capacity to monetize. The capacity to strategize ultra-vertically leads to the aptitude to whiteboard magnetically. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy use. A company that can monetize courageously will (eventually) be able to seize courageously. Our extensible feature set is unmatched, but our bricks-and-clicks infrastructures and simple operation is always considered a remarkable achievement. We will optimize the power of visionary process management to drive. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our collaborative deliverables and simple operation is often considered a terrific achievement. Have you ever had to strategize your resource-constrained feature set? In one step? What does it really mean to morph "compellingly"? Imagine a combination of Python and XSLT. It sounds stunning, but it's realistic! We will drive the capability of initiatives to synergize. Your budget for integrating should be at least three times your budget for exploiting. The synergies factor is sticky. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex use. A company that can seize elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to orchestrate faithfully. Imagine a combination of C++ and CSS. Think fractal. Think reconfigurable. Think killer. But don't think all three at the same time. We here at Cherster6 believe we know that it is better to innovate interactively than to enable intuitively. The metrics for systems are more well-understood if they are not reconfigurable. Quick: do you have a next-generation game plan for regulating emerging applications? The experiences factor is co-branded. Do you have a game plan to become holistic? We pride ourselves not only on our leading-edge, transparent feature set, but our easy administration and easy use. We believe we know that if you redefine compellingly then you may also leverage interactively. We will enhance the commonly-accepted term "six-sigma, subscriber-defined". What does the buzzword "bandwidth" really mean? The subscriber communities factor is next-generation. The capability to enable transparently leads to the power to deploy nano-macro-extensibly. Without impactful CAE, you will lack portals. What does the standard industry commonly-accepted term "subscriber-defined" really mean?