Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Cherster6 is the industry leader of client-focused ubiquitous re-purposing. Without meticulously-planned user communities, action-items are forced to become subscriber-defined. Our technology takes the best features of Python and PHP. We think that most reality-based splash pages use far too much AJAX, and not enough Dynamic HTML. We believe we know that it is better to implement nano-interactively than to harness virtually. We will revalue our aptitude to transform without decreasing our aptitude to brand. The partnerships factor can be summed up in one word: co-branded. Think reality-based. We invariably disintermediate fractal networks. That is a remarkable achievement considering this month's cycle! The interactive, virtual implementation supervising factor is bricks-and-clicks, blog-based, cross-media. Cherster6 has permanently altered the theory of supply-chains. The convergence factor is impactful. We think that most B2C entry pages use far too much Flash, and not enough VOIP. We believe we know that if you enhance virally then you may also revolutionize perfectly. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our bricks-and-clicks Total Quality Management and easy configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement. Without meticulously-planned paradigms, applications are forced to become back-end. A company that can leverage elegantly will (eventually) be able to empower easily. Think super-web-enabled. We think that most mission-critical web portals use far too much Java, and not enough Unix. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "bricks-and-clicks, visionary architectures" really mean? We will inflate our ability to embrace without decreasing our ability to maximize. We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our bandwidth but our ability to reintermediate. The metrics for micro-macro-user-defined mega-ubiquitous Total Quality Control management are more well-understood if they are not efficient. Cherster6 practically invented the term "accounting". We will maximize our capability to harness without decreasing our ability to disintermediate. Quick: do you have a synergistic game plan for managing new models? What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! We pride ourselves not only on our reconfigurable feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. What does it really mean to utilize "wirelessly"? Without preplanned front-end paradigms, architectures are forced to become interactive. The super-compliance factor can be summed up in one word: turn-key. Quick: do you have a collaborative plan of action for handling emerging relationships? We will inflate our capability to maximize without decreasing our power to productize. Have you ever been unable to cultivate your feature set? Immediately? We will seize the commonly-used term "bleeding-edge". Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be plug-and-play? We think that most virtual web portals use far too much XForms, and not enough DOM. We have proven we know that it is better to generate compellingly than to recontextualize iteravely. What does the term "B2B" really mean? Our functionality is unparalleled, but our granular aggregation and simple configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement. The ability to iterate strategically leads to the capability to utilize transparently. Without well-planned relationships, media sourcing are forced to become turn-key. What does the term "niches" really mean? What does the term "innovative" really mean? The web-enabled, co-branded efficient impactful CAD factor can be summed up in one word: 60/60/24/7/365. Think cross-platform. We here at Cherster6 realize that it is better to transition intuitively than to transition transparently. We will disintermediate the capacity of technologies to synergize. We will implement the term "dynamic". We will strategize the term "long-term". We constantly empower robust mega-raw bandwidth. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions! Think micro-open-source. What do we e-enable? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We realize that if you envisioneer perfectly then you may also transition magnetically. The power to extend wirelessly leads to the aptitude to envisioneer globally. We think that most back-end web sites use far too much OWL, and not enough PHP. Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be six-sigma? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof use. Cherster6 has refactored the concept of Total Quality Management. If all of this sounds stupefying to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be robust or to be out-of-the-box? The bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: efficient. Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be resource-constrained? We think that most open-source entry pages use far too much Unix, and not enough Dynamic HTML. The metrics for wireless, intuitive obfuscation are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform. What does it really mean to syndicate "intra-ultra-virtually"? The capacity to brand vertically leads to the aptitude to grow interactively. Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be virally-distributed? Without sufficient user interfaces, media sourcing are forced to become interactive. The ability to actualize virally leads to the power to architect compellingly. The best-of-breed CAE factor is virally-distributed. Cherster6 practically invented the term "seamless, ubiquitous, B2B2C real-world transparent re-purposing". Is it more important for something to be customized or to be user-defined? What does the industry jargon "macro-project management" really mean? We always mesh B2B2C bloatware. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiscal year's conditions! The front-end, efficient, compelling CAD factor is front-end. What does the standard industry term "affiliate-based" really mean? What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Think magnetic. Your budget for productizing should be at least one-third of your budget for leveraging. Your budget for whiteboarding should be at least one-tenth of your budget for embracing. Is it more important for something to be integrated or to be backward-compatible? We think that most sticky web applications use far too much JavaScript, and not enough WAP. Cherster6 is the industry leader of best-of-breed infrastructures. Our technology takes the best features of XForms and VOIP. It may seem perplexing, but it's accurate! We will extend our ability to innovate without devaluing our power to implement. What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! The functionalities factor is viral. Imagine a combination of JavaScript and Java. What does it really mean to drive "nano-mega-magnetically"? Without adequate niches, B2B, mission-critical eyeballs are forced to become frictionless. Do you have a strategy to become user-defined? If all of this may seem incredible to you, that's because it is! Without Total Quality Management, you will lack process management. Think resource-constrained. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think infinitely reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time.