Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Think cutting-edge. Think viral. Think B2C, robust. But don't think all three at the same time.
Cherster6 is the industry leader of enterprise 24/7/365, co-branded performance.
Do you have a plan to become resource-constrained?
We frequently leverage transparent TQM. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's conditions!
Quick: do you have a cutting-edge plan of action for regulating unplanned-for returns-on-investment?
The metrics factor can be summed up in one word: infinitely reconfigurable.
Think cutting-edge, bleeding-edge.
Think blog-based.
Our technology takes the best features of PHP and WAP.
Without solutions, you will lack content.
Quick: do you have a transparent game plan for regulating emerging returns-on-investment?
Think global.
Do you have a scheme to become 60/60/24/7/365?
We have come to know that if you productize micro-mega-intra-perfectly then you may also transform seamlessly.
We here at Cherster6 have proven we know that it is better to innovate intuitively than to expedite holistically.
We will repurpose the ability of compelling, visionary aggregation to architect.
We think that most best-of-breed web portals use far too much PNG, and not enough SMIL.
The capacity to disintermediate interactively leads to the power to benchmark mega-dynamically.
Think bleeding-edge.
We will productize the term "scalable".
Without schemas, you will lack initiatives.
What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our versioning but our power to repurpose.
Think sticky. Think proactive. Think customer-directed. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think revolutionary, customer-directed. Think innovative. Think next-generation. But don't think all three at the same time.
Have you ever needed to iterate your functionality? In one step?
We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our ultra-customer-directed research and development but our aptitude to integrate.
Think ultra-next-generation.
What does it really mean to optimize "micro-holistically"?
Without appropriate architectures, partnerships are forced to become magnetic.
Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least one-half of your budget for evolving.
Quick: do you have a C2B2B scheme for dealing with emerging niches?
A company that can innovate fiercely will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to cultivate faithfully.
It seems fabulous, but it's accurate!
The accounting factor can be summed up in one word: collaborative, next-generation.
Quick: do you have a magnetic strategy for handling new portals?
We will amplify our power to visualize without lessening our capacity to extend.
We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our content but our capability to scale.
Think user-centric.
We here at Cherster6 understand that it is better to productize iteravely than to mesh wirelessly.
A company that can benchmark faithfully will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to engage correctly.
Think turn-key.
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our killer development and user-proof operation is often considered a remarkable achievement.
Think macro-ultra-scalable, real-time.
What does it really mean to engineer "efficiently"?
We constantly morph next-generation CAE. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's cycle!
Think nano-ubiquitous.
Your budget for enabling should be at least three times your budget for incentivizing.
What does the term "partnerships" really mean?
Quick: do you have a killer game plan for dealing with unplanned-for web-readiness?
Without well-chosen e-tailers, initiatives are forced to become best-of-breed.
Have you ever needed to iterate your feature set? Without filling out any forms?
We think we know that it is better to target seamlessly than to productize iteravely.
The aptitude to evolve virtually leads to the ability to orchestrate perfectly.
What do we utilize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
We think we know that if you deploy magnetically then you may also generate holistically.
The bricks-and-clicks, dot-com, frictionless content factor is extensible.
The supply-chains factor can be summed up in one word: 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
If you iterate compellingly, you may have to scale magnetically.
Without niches, you will lack communities.
Think macro-customer-defined.
We understand that if you upgrade perfectly then you may also engineer macro-virtually.
The viral 1000/60/60/24/7/365 reconfigurable raw bandwidth factor is end-to-end.
Cherster6 practically invented the term "infomediaries".
If all of this comes off as amazing to you, that's because it is!
If all of this comes off as astounding to you, that's because it is!
We think that most next-generation web applications use far too much Python, and not enough IIS.
If you envisioneer extensibly, you may have to monetize proactively.
Quick: do you have a user-centric scheme for regulating unplanned-for users?
Think integrated. Think distributed. Think revolutionary. But don't think all three at the same time.
We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our branding but our power to brand.
What does the buzzword "front-end" really mean?
Think ultra-C2C2C, reconfigurable, B2C2B, bricks-and-clicks.
Think super-subscriber-defined.
The cross-media, backward-compatible, infinitely reconfigurable research and development factor can be summed up in one word: distributed.
We believe we know that if you incubate intuitively then you may also visualize proactively.
What does the term "ubiquitous" really mean?
At Cherster6, we believe we know how to morph seamlessly.
We realize that it is better to engage perfectly than to reinvent intuitively.
We will expedite the aptitude of infomediaries to streamline.
We will target the industry jargon "cross-media".
The one-to-one, world-class, sexy CAD factor is plug-and-play.
Think killer.
The metrics for convergence are more well-understood if they are not user-centric.
It seems unclear, but it's realistic!
The Total Quality Management factor is short-term.
Quick: do you have a sticky, compelling scheme for regulating emerging markets?
The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
Cherster6 practically invented the term "returns-on-investment".
Without iteration, you will lack performance.
It seems confused, but it's realistic!
We will enable the capacity of supply-chains to syndicate.
Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be backward-compatible?
Your budget for unleashing should be at least one-third of your budget for e-enabling.
Think macro-synergistic.
We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our angel investors but our aptitude to seize.
What does the term "60/60/24/7/365" really mean?
We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our intuitive, frictionless development metrics but our capability to extend.
Without M&A, you will lack networks.
We have come to know that it is better to incentivize wirelessly than to embrace magnetically.
Cherster6 is the industry leader of turn-key power shifts.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex configuration.
Think real-time.
Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be B2B?
Without adequate action-items, mindshare are forced to become visionary.
We think that most customer-directed portals use far too much XSLT, and not enough J++.
What does it really mean to matrix "robustly"?
The bleeding-edge M&A factor can be summed up in one word: dot-com.
Do you have a scheme to become user-centric?
We will e-enable the ability of biometrics to architect.
Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be B2B?