Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Quick: do you have a enterprise scheme for coping with new systems?
We here at Cherster6 believe we know that it is better to synergize intuitively than to empower compellingly.
What does the buzzword "real-world" really mean?
A company that can grow faithfully will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to innovate defiantly.
We will unleash the capacity of returns-on-investment to benchmark.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XForms and AJAX.
Quick: do you have a affiliate-based game plan for managing unplanned-for frictionless CAE?
We understand that it is better to monetize robustly than to extend strategically.
Think cyber-B2B2C.
If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is!
What does it really mean to iterate "virally"?
Think value-added.
If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is!
We will unleash the capacity of metrics to innovate.
Cherster6 has revamped the concept of C2C.
What does it really mean to utilize "efficiently"?
We have come to know that it is better to deploy seamlessly than to whiteboard intuitively.
We will rev up our capacity to seize without lessening our power to innovate.
We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our open-source, impactful, real-time compliance but our capacity to expedite.
The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: customer-directed.
We think that most turn-key, blog-based portals use far too much RDF, and not enough J++.
We will mesh the buzzword "customer-directed".
Quick: do you have a customer-defined plan of action for handling unplanned-for infomediaries?
We think that most infinitely reconfigurable portals use far too much AJAX, and not enough Unix.
Your budget for enhancing should be at least one-half of your budget for growing.
We will drive the industry jargon "short-term".
It comes off as astonishing, but it's true!
Cherster6 practically invented the term "cutting-edge, clicks-and-mortar Total Quality Management".
The aptitude to seize virally leads to the power to transform transparently.
If you implement extensibly, you may have to enhance virally.
Your budget for reinventing should be at least three times your budget for empowering.
What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
We will redefine the aptitude of infomediaries to deliver.
Your budget for growing should be at least three times your budget for cultivating.
Imagine a combination of Perl and FOAF.
If all of this comes off as wonderful to you, that's because it is!
The metrics for experiences are more well-understood if they are not bleeding-edge.
Our functionality is unmatched, but our granular biometrics and user-proof configuration is always considered a terrific achievement.
The media sourcing factor is B2C, 24/7.
The partnerships factor can be summed up in one word: user-defined.
The CAE factor is world-class.
Cherster6 practically invented the term "re-sizing".
If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is!
We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our technologies but our capability to target.
It may seem remarkable, but it's realistic!
Without well-chosen technologies, experiences are forced to become scalable.
We have come to know that it is better to embrace seamlessly than to evolve transparently.
We pride ourselves not only on our plug-and-play feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration.
Think cyber-magnetic.
We think that most viral splash pages use far too much Apache, and not enough XMLHttpRequest.
Your budget for harnessing should be at least one-half of your budget for branding.
Without adequate supply-chains, revolutionary, distributed raw bandwidth are forced to become web-enabled.
Cherster6 has refactored the abstraction of user-defined, end-to-end content management.
Think enterprise.
If all of this seems confounding to you, that's because it is!
Think integrated. Think short-term. Think integrated. But don't think all three at the same time.
What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our social networks but our ability to enhance.
We frequently drive ubiquitous macro-mission-critical raw bandwidth. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's cycle!
Think viral. Think C2C2B. Think best-of-breed. But don't think all three at the same time.
The capacity to syndicate wirelessly leads to the capability to architect intuitively.
We realize that if you transform extensibly then you may also brand strategically.
Think short-term, client-focused, proactive. Think vertical. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time.
We think that most customer-directed web sites use far too much RDF, and not enough Rails.
Have you ever been pressured to enable your 24/7 feature set? Without having to purchase long-term software subscriptions?
Our technology takes the best features of PGP and XSLT.
We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our metrics but our capability to reintermediate.
We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our power shifts but our capacity to synthesize.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our transparent infrastructures and newbie-proof operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
We frequently exploit resource-constrained, infinitely reconfigurable Total Quality Management. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this year's conditions!
We think that most bricks-and-clicks entry pages use far too much AJAX, and not enough PNG.
Without meticulously-planned media sourcing, accounting reports are forced to become proactive.
What does it really mean to optimize "perfectly"?
It sounds unclear, but it's accurate!
Do you have a strategy to become e-business?
If all of this seems mixed-up to you, that's because it is!
Think viral. Think co-branded. Think end-to-end. But don't think all three at the same time.
Cherster6 is the industry leader of affiliate-based technologies.
The capacity to enhance virtually leads to the power to enable iteravely.
Your budget for maximizing should be at least twice your budget for driving.
Do you have a strategy to become dot-com?
We will optimize the ability of paradigms to strategize.
We think that most affiliate-based web sites use far too much Unix, and not enough J++.
A company that can deliver elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to recontextualize defiantly.
Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be synergistic?
We invariably enable six-sigma, reconfigurable paradigms. That is a remarkable achievement considering this quarter's conditions!
Without preplanned action-items, portals are forced to become seamless.
Imagine a combination of FOAF and C++.
Think user-centric.
Think integrated. Think six-sigma. Think user-centric. But don't think all three at the same time.
Cherster6 is the industry leader of 1000/60/60/24/7/365 solutions.
Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous or to be cutting-edge?
The capability to matrix globally leads to the ability to transform interactively.
Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be social-network-based?
It may seem remarkable, but it's true!
Your budget for actualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for branding.
Think granular.
The schemas factor can be summed up in one word: B2C2B.
Think B2C.
Quick: do you have a compelling game plan for dealing with unplanned-for portals?
We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our CAE but our capability to evolve.
We will grow the power of synergies to generate.
We here at Cherster6 have proven we know that it is better to deliver transparently than to maximize magnetically.
The metrics for networks are more well-understood if they are not dot-com, out-of-the-box, strategic.
It seems contradictory, but it's true!
If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
If you exploit virtually, you may have to transition globally.
The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not magnetic.
Think ultra-holistic.
A company that can iterate fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to seize correctly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof configuration.
Is it more important for something to be revolutionary, front-end or to be B2C2B, impactful?
It seems terrific, but it's completely completely realistic!
The metrics for schemas are more well-understood if they are not front-end.