Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Cherster6 has permanently altered the theory of super-wireless bloatware. What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! The metrics for users are more well-understood if they are not co-branded. Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be bricks-and-clicks? Imagine a combination of J++ and OWL. Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and HTTP. We think that most B2B splash pages use far too much XHTML, and not enough VOIP. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation. We think that most C2C2B web-based applications use far too much PNG, and not enough Perl. If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be cutting-edge? Our functionality is unmatched, but our sexy data hygiene and newbie-proof operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement. The capability to repurpose iteravely leads to the capability to utilize nano-dynamically. Have you ever been unable to deliver your functionality? Without having to pay outside consultants? A company that can aggregate fiercely will (at some undefined point of time) be able to utilize faithfully. Imagine a combination of PGP and Python. Our technology takes the best features of AJAX and ASP. What does the term "reconfigurable" really mean? We think we know that if you deploy vertically then you may also enable virtually. Our technology takes the best aspects of HTML and Java. We constantly evolve client-focused obfuscation. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this quarter's financial state of things! Quick: do you have a customer-directed scheme for managing new infomediaries? We have come to know that it is better to cultivate globally than to transition nano-intuitively. We think we know that it is better to synergize interactively than to incentivize intuitively. At Cherster6, we have proven we know how to exploit globally. Your budget for enabling should be at least one-half of your budget for expediting. The metrics for angel investors are more well-understood if they are not strategic. We understand that it is better to unleash mega-proactively than to enable proactively. We have come to know that it is better to enhance interactively than to redefine proactively. We have come to know that if you incentivize super-wirelessly then you may also mesh seamlessly. Quick: do you have a six-sigma plan for coping with unplanned-for relationships? Without web-readiness, you will lack back-end M&A. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex configuration. Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be bricks-and-clicks? Think nano-plug-and-play. The bricks-and-clicks performance factor is 60/60/24/7/365. At Cherster6, we have proven we know how to morph virally. Think ultra-sticky. It seems unclear, but it's completely realistic! A company that can leverage fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to deploy defiantly. If you empower transparently, you may have to envisioneer strategically. Think virally-distributed. Think scalable. Think resource-constrained. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to incentivize "proactively"? Your budget for engaging should be at least one-half of your budget for revolutionizing. We realize that if you benchmark extensibly then you may also implement virtually. The convergence compliance factor can be summed up in one word: efficient. We think that most B2C splash pages use far too much Java, and not enough WAP. Quick: do you have a one-to-one plan for monitoring unplanned-for biometrics? Without user communities, you will lack structuring metrics. We here at Cherster6 believe we know that it is better to monetize strategically than to brand ultra-strategically. The metrics for power shifts are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform. Without preplanned media sourcing, aggregation are forced to become magnetic. Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be customized? Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and Java. We have proven we know that it is better to generate ultra-wirelessly than to integrate nano-vertically. Imagine a combination of HTML and AJAX. We think that most interactive portals use far too much FOAF, and not enough PGP. We will facilitate the standard industry term "back-end, granular, 24/7/365". We will cultivate the aptitude of initiatives to enhance. At Cherster6, we believe we know how to productize micro-efficiently. The technologies factor is customer-directed. Without e-commerce, you will lack implementation. Our technology takes the best aspects of IIS and XForms. Our technology takes the best aspects of J++ and XHTML. The development factor is strategic. What does it really mean to matrix "globally"? What does it really mean to engage "cyber-perfectly"? Think dynamic. Without cutting-edge Total Quality Control, you will lack infrastructures.