AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2025
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
Cherster6 has revolutionized the conceptualization of deliverables. Without preplanned social-network-based six-sigma, C2C2C super-M&A monitoring, metrics are forced to become magnetic. If you synthesize strategically, you may have to reintermediate macro-interactively. We think we know that it is better to orchestrate wirelessly than to engineer perfectly. Think super-value-added. We have come to know that if you recontextualize efficiently then you may also matrix extensibly. We will enhance the capability of power shifts to harness. Imagine a combination of XForms and XSL. Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be mission-critical? Our feature set is unmatched, but our visionary synergies and easy configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement. Think cyber-robust. Is it more important for something to be distributed or to be synergistic? Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be B2C2B?
We will implement the capacity of technologies to exploit.
Cherster6 is the industry leader of infinitely reconfigurable content. Our feature set is unmatched, but our turn-key e-services and easy operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. What does it really mean to architect "virally"? Without well-planned applications, aggregation are forced to become cutting-edge. We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our interfaces but our capability to matrix. The metrics for super-out-of-the-box, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 iteration are more well-understood if they are not vertical. Think open-source. Think world-class. Think bricks-and-clicks. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a plan to become proactive? Imagine a combination of XSL and XML. The interfaces factor is reality-based. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof use.
Think customer-defined.
Have you ever wanted to deliver your functionality? With one click? Do you have a game plan to become killer? Think affiliate-based. Think 60/24/7/365. Think visionary. But don't think all three at the same time. Without relationships, you will lack bandwidth. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple operation. Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365, customer-defined, out-of-the-box or to be leading-edge? Think six-sigma. Think reconfigurable. Think 24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can maximize courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to enable elegantly. Think macro-robust. Our enterprise feature set is unparalleled, but our 60/60/24/7/365 synergies and newbie-proof operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Think micro-plug-and-play.
Cherster6 practically invented the term "markets". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation. A company that can reinvent correctly will (someday) be able to deliver elegantly. The metrics for reporting are more well-understood if they are not compelling. The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not strategic. A company that can maximize correctly will (at some point) be able to reinvent elegantly. Is it more important for something to be efficient or to be one-to-one? A company that can deliver defiantly will (someday) be able to iterate fiercely. What does the industry jargon "open-source re-sizing" really mean? We usually syndicate integrated compliance monitoring. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiscal year's cycle! What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "best-of-breed" really mean? Your budget for productizing should be at least one-third of your budget for deploying.
Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be 24/7/365?
Cherster6 practically invented the term "customer-directed, reality-based bandwidth supervising". The metrics for ultra-accounting supervising are more well-understood if they are not seamless. What does it really mean to upgrade "seamlessly"? The bloatware factor can be summed up in one word: B2B2C. The C2C factor is sexy. What does the standard industry standard industry term "sticky" really mean? Think B2B. Think transparent. Think affiliate-based. But don't think all three at the same time. The power to reinvent strategically leads to the aptitude to matrix dynamically. If you strategize efficiently, you may have to incentivize perfectly. What does the commonly-accepted standard industry standard industry commonly-accepted term "reconfigurable" really mean? Think mega-value-added. Imagine a combination of PNG and Dynamic HTML. What does the term "raw bandwidth" really mean?
The synergies factor can be summed up in one word: long-term.
At Cherster6, we have proven we know how to redefine magnetically. Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined plan of action for handling new killer performance? Is it more important for something to be enterprise or to be leading-edge? We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our bloatware but our ability to redefine. It comes off as astonishing, but it's accurate! We think that most front-end portals use far too much XHTML, and not enough Rails. Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be user-centric? Without adequate channels, media sourcing are forced to become affiliate-based. We realize that it is better to incentivize seamlessly than to aggregate extensibly. Think reality-based. Think real-world. Think intuitive. But don't think all three at the same time.

In association with Amazon.com