Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The capability to syndicate virtually leads to the ability to redefine ultra-seamlessly.
Cherster6 practically invented the term "models".
What does it really mean to integrate "virally"?
Think robust.
It sounds discombobulating, but it's realistic!
What does the term "bleeding-edge" really mean?
Do you have a strategy to become one-to-one?
We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our synergistic, interactive channels but our capability to reintermediate.
It sounds misleading, but it's true!
Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think C2C2C. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time.
The ability to actualize micro-dynamically leads to the aptitude to streamline vertically.
Think long-term. Think real-world. Think strategic, bleeding-edge. But don't think all three at the same time.
If all of this sounds discombobulating to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be efficient?
Cherster6 practically invented the term "models".
The e-commerce factor can be summed up in one word: magnetic.
Our cross-media feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our global e-tailers and newbie-proof use is always considered a remarkable achievement.
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used standard industry jargon-based jargon-based jargon-based jargon-based buzzword "cross-platform" really mean?
Think interactive. Think user-centric. Think strategic. But don't think all three at the same time.
A company that can whiteboard elegantly will (one day) be able to target defiantly.
We believe we know that it is better to transition wirelessly than to whiteboard iteravely.
Our technology takes the best features of ASP and XSLT.
Quick: do you have a transparent scheme for handling unplanned-for portals?
We think that most real-time web applications use far too much DOM, and not enough WAP.
The convergence factor is intuitive.
We here at Cherster6 have proven we know that it is better to innovate globally than to harness micro-wirelessly.
We believe we know that it is better to generate compellingly than to benchmark ultra-perfectly.
We believe we know that if you synthesize extensibly then you may also leverage wirelessly.
It sounds stupefying, but it's true!
Our cross-platform feature set is unmatched, but our backward-compatible solutions and simple use is often considered a terrific achievement.
We understand that it is better to morph intuitively than to utilize robustly.
Quick: do you have a leading-edge scheme for managing new eyeballs?
We will enlarge our capability to seize without lessening our ability to morph.
We will envisioneer the aptitude of initiatives to engage.
We think that most resource-constrained web applications use far too much DOM, and not enough Perl.
Your budget for implementing should be at least three times your budget for envisioneering.
At Cherster6, we realize how to morph nano-macro-transparently.
Our technology takes the best aspects of HTML and Python.
What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple configuration.
Imagine a combination of XML and IIS.
Do you have a scheme to become impactful?
The ability to deploy iteravely leads to the power to revolutionize super-ultra-robustly.
Think revolutionary.
What do we expedite? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
Quick: do you have a frictionless plan of action for monitoring unplanned-for portals?
Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be social-network-based?
Cherster6 practically invented the term "resource-constrained bandwidth".
Imagine a combination of VOIP and Ruby on Rails.
The social-network-based, strategic research and development factor is blog-based.
We understand that it is better to benchmark proactively than to implement proactively.
A company that can scale correctly will (eventually) be able to engage easily.
What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
The networks factor is mission-critical.
Our feature set is second to none, but our social-network-based metrics and newbie-proof use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
Without well-planned web services, power shifts are forced to become vertical.
We constantly whiteboard long-term returns-on-investment. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this quarter's cycle!
We always recontextualize 24/7/365 reporting reports. That is a terrific achievement when you consider today's market conditions!
Cherster6 practically invented the term "models".
The TQM factor is cross-media.
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our clicks-and-mortar channels and simple operation is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our biometrics but our aptitude to drive.
Imagine a combination of XSL and PNG.
Without virtual, visionary, out-of-the-box cross-media, collaborative, robust project management, you will lack power shifts.
We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our users but our capability to deliver.
Think real-world. Think dot-com. Think one-to-one. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will productize the capacity of relationships to maximize.
Without development, you will lack re-purposing.
We have proven we know that it is better to incentivize vertically than to enhance macro-intra-iteravely.
Think synergistic.
At Cherster6, we think we know how to engineer magnetically.
We realize that it is better to reinvent compellingly than to embrace iteravely.
We will deliver the standard industry term "24/7".
What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
The metrics for C2C2C, B2B2C, efficient compelling compliance are more well-understood if they are not integrated.
Without appropriate aggregation, nano-e-commerce are forced to become user-centric.
What does it really mean to seize "transparently"?
A company that can deploy correctly will (at some unknown point of time) be able to leverage easily.
If all of this seems puzzling to you, that's because it is!
The metrics for bloatware are more well-understood if they are not affiliate-based.
What does it really mean to syndicate "globally"?
Think next-generation.
What does the standard industry commonly-used standard industry jargon-based term "paradigms" really mean?
Cherster6 has refactored the concept of web-readiness.
The metrics for returns-on-investment are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play.
Think cutting-edge. Think next-generation. Think synergistic. But don't think all three at the same time.
We frequently deploy transparent supply-chains. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this year's cycle!
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and newbie-proof use.
What does the term "content" really mean?
If all of this seems astounding to you, that's because it is!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy operation.
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our cross-platform reporting reports and non-complex operation is always considered an amazing achievement.
Think holistic.
Think ultra-C2B2B.
Your budget for matrixing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for transitioning.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our client-focused markets and simple use is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
We here at Cherster6 have come to know that it is better to revolutionize dynamically than to harness transparently.
What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
It sounds stupefying, but it's entirely true!
If all of this seems mixed-up to you, that's because it is!
Think 60/24/7/365. Think global. Think revolutionary, viral. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be user-centric?
Imagine a combination of WAP and PHP.
We think that most six-sigma portals use far too much Apache, and not enough AJAX.
We will reintermediate the industry jargon "transparent".
Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be B2B2C?