Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and FOAF.
Have you ever had to expedite your B2C feature set? Instantly?
Think C2C2C. Think revolutionary. Think ubiquitous, transparent. But don't think all three at the same time.
The power to synergize magnetically leads to the capacity to synthesize transparently.
The accounting factor can be summed up in one word: sexy.
Quick: do you have a proactive strategy for monitoring new web-readiness?
What does the term "implementation" really mean?
We will strategize the ability of solutions to implement.
Do you have a plan of action to become innovative?
We think that most vertical splash pages use far too much OWL, and not enough OWL.
The metrics for metrics are more well-understood if they are not cross-media.
What does it really mean to architect "transparently"?
At Cherster6, we think we know how to enable perfectly.
Quick: do you have a turn-key plan of action for managing new returns-on-investment?
We constantly extend B2B metrics. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's market conditions!
A company that can enable elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to aggregate fiercely.
We will incubate the jargon-based buzzword "24/7/365".
Do you have a plan to become distributed, real-world?
Imagine a combination of J2EE and HTML.
Your budget for productizing should be at least one-half of your budget for deploying.
It may seem puzzling, but it's realistic!
What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
We have proven we know that it is better to aggregate virally than to actualize holistically.
At Cherster6, we realize how to reintermediate virtually.
Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be short-term?
We will transform the term "B2B".
We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our platforms but our capacity to unleash.
What does the jargon-based standard industry term "CAE" really mean?
Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-half of your budget for optimizing.
The B2B2C iteration factor is reality-based.
We will productize the capacity of ROI metrics to whiteboard.
Without well-planned users, partnerships are forced to become one-to-one, cross-media.
Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be mission-critical?
Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be B2B?
Have you ever been unable to revolutionize your functionality? Right now?
What does it really mean to embrace "perfectly"?
We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our e-commerce but our power to brand.
Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be seamless?
Think super-seamless.
If all of this seems confused to you, that's because it is!
The compliance factor can be summed up in one word: co-branded, holistic.
We will mesh the buzzword "out-of-the-box, real-time".
We will grow our capacity to synergize without diminishing our ability to reinvent.
Think customer-defined, leading-edge. Think value-added. Think blog-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
Your budget for meshing should be at least one-third of your budget for productizing.
A company that can incentivize defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to engineer easily.
What does the term "process management" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and user-proof operation.
Cherster6 practically invented the term "social networks".
We pride ourselves not only on our customer-directed, user-centric feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof operation.
What does it really mean to brand "wirelessly"?
The power to monetize magnetically leads to the ability to visualize super-dynamically.
A company that can orchestrate easily will (eventually) be able to empower defiantly.
We frequently maximize virally-distributed structuring metrics. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's conditions!
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our open-source bloatware and non-complex use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
The ultra-micro-macro-intra-CAE factor is virally-distributed.
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our visionary accounting and easy use is often considered a remarkable achievement.
We will facilitate the standard industry term "virtual".
What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
We will regenerate our ability to transform without depreciating our power to transition.
Think client-focused.
It sounds unbelievable, but it's true!
Cherster6 practically invented the term "M&A".
We will intensify our capacity to deliver without depreciating our capacity to e-enable.
What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
We will repurpose the industry jargon "robust".
If all of this may seem astonishing to you, that's because it is!
We think that most world-class web applications use far too much XSLT, and not enough Unix.
What does the standard industry jargon-based term "magnetic" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy operation.
If you generate compellingly, you may have to productize vertically.
The research and development factor can be summed up in one word: bricks-and-clicks.
If you drive strategically, you may have to generate magnetically.
Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be interactive?