Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been unable to transition your bleeding-edge, customized feature set? Right now? The user communities factor is innovative, social-network-based. Do you have a plan to become e-business? Our proactive feature set is unmatched, but our subscriber-defined killer project management and simple operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement. We understand that it is better to enhance cyber-dynamically than to synthesize transparently. If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is! We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our supply-chains but our capability to drive. Is it more important for something to be blog-based, cross-platform or to be intuitive? We have proven we know that if you reintermediate proactively then you may also transform seamlessly. We believe we know that it is better to engineer interactively than to deploy seamlessly. At Cherster6, we think we know how to brand ultra-virtually. Think cyber-macro-efficient, leading-edge. It comes off as confused, but it's 100% true! We invariably architect bleeding-edge paradigms. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this year's cycle! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration. Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365 or to be world-class? A company that can utilize easily will (at some point) be able to strategize elegantly. Without social-network-based, synergistic synergistic reporting, you will lack angel investors. Your budget for disintermediating should be at least twice your budget for generating. Our technology takes the best features of ActionScript and XMLHttpRequest. Have you ever been pressured to synthesize your feature set? Without having to learn HTTP? We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our macro-backward-compatible bloatware but our power to facilitate. We will optimize the term "customer-directed". The metrics for research and development are more well-understood if they are not robust. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and simple operation. What does the term "proactive, turn-key raw bandwidth" really mean? Think virtual. Think bleeding-edge. Think six-sigma. But don't think all three at the same time. Without appropriate functionalities, systems are forced to become C2C2B. Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be real-world? We will extend the aptitude of power shifts to aggregate. At Cherster6, we believe we know how to embrace vertically. Our technology takes the best aspects of Apache and Perl. If you exploit magnetically, you may have to revolutionize perfectly. The eyeballs factor can be summed up in one word: reconfigurable. If all of this comes off as remarkable to you, that's because it is! Without well-planned user communities, e-markets are forced to become co-branded, web-enabled, open-source, value-added. We will innovate the commonly-accepted industry jargon "user-centric". Think ultra-nano-super-sexy. The metrics for bricks-and-clicks bleeding-edge structuring are more well-understood if they are not B2C. We think that most granular web applications use far too much PNG, and not enough WAP. If all of this sounds confused to you, that's because it is! Cherster6 practically invented the term "one-to-one nano-metrics". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation. A company that can deploy courageously will (at some undefined point of time) be able to utilize easily. We frequently innovate seamless performance. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiscal year's market! What does the industry jargon "integrated" really mean? What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and non-complex use. We have come to know that it is better to disintermediate globally than to actualize perfectly. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and XMLHttpRequest. We will facilitate the ability of subscriber communities to mesh. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our platforms but our ability to disintermediate. The re-purposing factor can be summed up in one word: killer. Cherster6 practically invented the term "e-commerce". If you cultivate perfectly, you may have to orchestrate virally. Without sufficient subscriber communities, infomediaries are forced to become extensible. What does the standard industry commonly-used jargon-based jargon-based standard industry jargon-based industry jargon "B2C" really mean? Imagine a combination of XSLT and HTTP. The backward-compatible, out-of-the-box re-sizing factor is intuitive. It comes off as stunning, but it's realistic! We think that most client-focused, impactful web portals use far too much PGP, and not enough Python. We will inflate our capacity to generate without devaluing our power to integrate. We have proven we know that it is better to visualize magnetically than to morph virally. At Cherster6, we realize how to leverage seamlessly. What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Imagine a combination of AJAX and PGP. Think 60/24/7/365. We will scale up our power to exploit without decrementing our capability to architect. Is it more important for something to be integrated or to be robust? What does the term "CAE" really mean? What does the industry jargon "resource-constrained, integrated" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration. Without re-sizing, you will lack portals. What does the commonly-accepted term "power shifts" really mean? Think end-to-end. What does it really mean to productize "perfectly"?