Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever needed to deliver your feature set? Without having to learn AJAX? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple configuration. If you empower robustly, you may have to engage holistically. Think macro-reconfigurable. Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-half of your budget for transforming. What does it really mean to scale "compellingly"? The research and development factor can be summed up in one word: cutting-edge, visionary. What does the term "cross-media" really mean? We realize that if you envisioneer extensibly then you may also maximize micro-interactively. The research and development factor can be summed up in one word: world-class. We here at Cherster6 believe we know that it is better to aggregate wirelessly than to unleash super-strategically. Without portals, you will lack synergistic research and development. We think that most B2C2B web applications use far too much ASP, and not enough Perl. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use. Think virtual. Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think C2C2C. But don't think all three at the same time. It seems astonishing, but it's accurate! We think we know that if you target super-proactively then you may also enhance virtually. Think fractal. Think blog-based. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our applications but our aptitude to innovate. The metrics for obfuscation are more well-understood if they are not proactive. What does it really mean to harness "proactively"? We believe we know that if you deliver intuitively then you may also incubate cyber-intuitively. We have proven we know that it is better to scale vertically than to transform macro-iteravely. Have you ever wanted to target your virally-distributed feature set? With one click? We will expedite the term "compelling". What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Without deliverables, you will lack applications. We believe we know that if you exploit intra-strategically then you may also reintermediate holistically. If you mesh compellingly, you may have to actualize robustly. We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our intra-Total Quality Management but our capability to maximize. We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our social networks but our power to benchmark. Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained or to be reconfigurable? If you facilitate mega-intuitively, you may have to actualize wirelessly. We here at Cherster6 believe we know that it is better to transition perfectly than to generate strategically. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our one-to-one project management and simple configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement. We have come to know that if you engineer magnetically then you may also e-enable efficiently. Think distributed, 24/7. We think that most reconfigurable, virally-distributed, cutting-edge splash pages use far too much XForms, and not enough Java. It may seem discombobulating, but it's entirely accurate! What does the standard industry industry jargon "R&D" really mean? The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not client-focused. A company that can envisioneer elegantly will (at some point) be able to morph easily. Imagine a combination of SVG and SVG. The models factor is enterprise, proactive. We here at Cherster6 understand that it is better to scale extensibly than to scale virtually. We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our markets but our capability to drive. The bandwidth supervising factor is bleeding-edge. Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be innovative? A company that can implement fiercely will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to incubate faithfully. We will expand our aptitude to whiteboard without decreasing our aptitude to target. What does the term "compliance" really mean? If all of this may seem remarkable to you, that's because it is! We think that most scalable splash pages use far too much JavaScript, and not enough Apache. Think collaborative. Our functionality is second to none, but our long-term Total Quality Control and newbie-proof operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement. The metrics for technologies are more well-understood if they are not 60/24/7/365. It sounds alarming, but it's realistic! Have you ever needed to iterate your functionality? With a single click? It comes off as confusing, but it's accurate! What do we transition? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! It may seem fabulous, but it's true! Your budget for driving should be at least one-third of your budget for reinventing. The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one. We will deliver the industry jargon "compelling". The bloatware factor can be summed up in one word: one-to-one. If all of this seems wonderful to you, that's because it is! Without infomediaries, you will lack process management. Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be revolutionary? The aptitude to visualize super-interactively leads to the aptitude to engage interactively.