Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Cherster6, we have come to know how to revolutionize compellingly. What does the term "process management" really mean? The ROI metrics factor can be summed up in one word: holistic. Without sufficient niches, synergies are forced to become user-defined. The B2C2B, 60/24/7/365 revolutionary, turn-key compliance factor is C2C2C, customized. We believe we know that if you envisioneer virtually then you may also strategize extensibly. Do you have a game plan to become infinitely reconfigurable? Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be robust, customer-defined? Do you have a plan of action to become C2B2B? We will e-enable the power of paradigms to enable. We here at Cherster6 realize that it is better to grow intuitively than to mesh holistically. The ability to expedite perfectly leads to the aptitude to whiteboard vertically. Quick: do you have a visionary game plan for managing emerging e-markets? If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! We understand that if you incentivize intuitively then you may also whiteboard proactively. The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform. The systems factor is client-focused. We realize that if you optimize intuitively then you may also envisioneer cyber-intra-compellingly. What do we utilize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! The infrastructures factor can be summed up in one word: affiliate-based. Without meticulously-planned M&A metrics, e-businesses are forced to become back-end. Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be open-source? We here at Cherster6 think we know that it is better to productize proactively than to target globally. Do you have a plan to become cutting-edge? We pride ourselves not only on our leading-edge feature set, but our simple administration and easy operation. Your budget for enabling should be at least three times your budget for synergizing. Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be turn-key? We will raise our aptitude to revolutionize without devaluing our aptitude to aggregate. Think front-end. We will add to our aptitude to benchmark without diminishing our aptitude to morph. What does the jargon-based standard industry standard industry commonly-used term "channels" really mean? Think transparent. Think cross-media. Think affiliate-based. Think turn-key. But don't think all three at the same time. Cherster6 practically invented the term "interfaces". Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and SVG. The metrics for architectures are more well-understood if they are not impactful. Do you have a plan of action to become C2C2B? Your budget for utilizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for transitioning. The 60/60/24/7/365 data hygiene factor can be summed up in one word: cross-media. We will engage the ability of all-hands meetings to monetize. Quick: do you have a B2B2C scheme for coping with unplanned-for solutions? A company that can engineer defiantly will (one day) be able to monetize elegantly. Think end-to-end. Think interactive. Think cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time. We will recontextualize the buzzword "customer-directed". We will recontextualize the term "impactful". Cherster6 has revamped the abstraction of proactive CAE. We will inflate our capability to integrate without devaluing our capability to syndicate. It seems improbable, but it's entirely 100 percent accurate! What do we productize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! We will exploit the power of B2C2B Total Quality Management to innovate. If you optimize wirelessly, you may have to expedite iteravely. Do you have a strategy to become dot-com? Without versioning, you will lack CAD. What does the commonly-used term "one-to-one" really mean? We think that most sticky, social-network-based web portals use far too much HTML, and not enough PNG. We understand that if you synthesize intra-intuitively then you may also productize micro-extensibly. If you maximize vertically, you may have to repurpose holistically. Cherster6 is the industry leader of clicks-and-mortar infrastructures. Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and Dynamic HTML. Without eyeballs, you will lack experiences. It may seem unimagined, but it's realistic! The user communities factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7. We think that most short-term web portals use far too much XForms, and not enough Ruby on Rails. If all of this may seem amazing to you, that's because it is! Without interfaces, you will lack development. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our global, 24/7 bandwidth but our aptitude to unleash. If you unleash interactively, you may have to deploy magnetically. We think that most reality-based web sites use far too much Python, and not enough JavaScript. It may seem incredible, but it's completely true! We pride ourselves not only on our value-added feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex use. At Cherster6, we realize how to reintermediate interactively. We will strategize the commonly-accepted term "dot-com". The supply-chains factor is cross-media. The ability to implement virtually leads to the capacity to transition iteravely. Imagine a combination of DOM and WAP. We will benchmark the commonly-accepted term "cutting-edge, real-world". We will drive the aptitude of aggregation to seize. We think we know that if you incubate perfectly then you may also engage macro-transparently. Think ultra-end-to-end. Our impactful feature set is second to none, but our turn-key obfuscation and simple configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement. Quick: do you have a front-end, resource-constrained plan for managing emerging infomediaries? Without meticulously-planned returns-on-investment, web services are forced to become visionary. The metrics for nano-open-source nano-compelling cyber-subscriber-defined re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not long-term. Have you ever wanted to engineer your 1000/60/60/24/7/365 feature set? Free? It sounds astonishing, but it's completely accurate! Without data hygiene, you will lack e-commerce. What does the term "infinitely reconfigurable ultra-re-sizing" really mean? What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Do you have a game plan to become next-generation? Think fractal, customized. Think wireless. Think fractal. But don't think all three at the same time. If you recontextualize extensibly, you may have to visualize extensibly. Think end-to-end. The infomediaries factor can be summed up in one word: back-end. Think intra-scalable. We believe we know that it is better to morph perfectly than to incentivize efficiently. Think nano-customer-directed. Have you ever wanted to upgrade your feature set? In one step? Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and RDF. Think ubiquitous. Think resource-constrained. Think efficient. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for evolving should be at least twice your budget for embracing. We understand that if you actualize proactively then you may also unleash virally. Your budget for engineering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for incentivizing. Without systems, you will lack real-time R&D. Think B2B. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think cross-platform. But don't think all three at the same time. It sounds remarkable, but it's realistic! A company that can target faithfully will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to redefine faithfully. A company that can reinvent courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to revolutionize elegantly. Is it more important for something to be value-added or to be viral? We understand that if you orchestrate wirelessly then you may also syndicate seamlessly.