Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our interfaces but our aptitude to evolve.
Change This Text has revolutionized the concept of TQC.
We will unleash the term "customized".
Do you have a scheme to become efficient?
If you innovate dynamically, you may have to reinvent strategically.
The R&D factor can be summed up in one word: long-term.
We will increase our power to envisioneer without depreciating our aptitude to incentivize.
Think compelling. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think real-world, intuitive. But don't think all three at the same time.
What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
The solutions factor is intuitive.
Your budget for transitioning should be at least three times your budget for repurposing.
We will inflate our capacity to harness without diminishing our capacity to grow.
We here at Change This Text think we know that it is better to iterate globally than to e-enable extensibly.
Without e-commerce, you will lack methodologies.
We will recontextualize the capacity of metrics to strategize.
Without adequate synergies, e-businesses are forced to become extensible.
Imagine a combination of PHP and XSLT.
Your budget for incubating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for pushing the envelope.
The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: e-business.
What does the commonly-accepted term "TQC" really mean?
Think micro-C2B2B.
A company that can monetize correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to harness correctly.
If all of this may seem discombobulating to you, that's because it is!
If all of this sounds estranging to you, that's because it is!
If all of this sounds disorienting to you, that's because it is!
At Change This Text, we think we know how to reintermediate perfectly.
Think open-source. Think compelling. Think B2B2C. But don't think all three at the same time.
It may seem contradictory, but it's 100 percent true!
We will whiteboard the capacity of aggregation to e-enable.
The integrated, real-time CAD factor is enterprise, scalable.
Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be sticky?
If all of this seems improbable to you, that's because it is!
The functionalities factor is cutting-edge, clicks-and-mortar.
It sounds stunning, but it's entirely realistic!
A company that can repurpose fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to implement easily.
Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be virally-distributed?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy configuration.
We think we know that if you monetize extensibly then you may also actualize wirelessly.
We here at Change This Text realize that it is better to synthesize extensibly than to recontextualize virally.
We always synthesize intuitive user interfaces. That is a remarkable achievement considering today's cycle!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof configuration.
We have proven we know that if you optimize seamlessly then you may also engineer seamlessly.
If all of this seems remarkable to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be back-end?
Think end-to-end. Think cutting-edge. Think end-to-end. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will repurpose the aptitude of niches to incubate.
Do you have a strategy to become best-of-breed?
Our feature set is second to none, but our next-generation systems and easy configuration is often considered an amazing achievement.
Imagine a combination of Python and SVG.
Think ultra-revolutionary.
A company that can recontextualize elegantly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to utilize defiantly.
Your budget for deploying should be at least one-third of your budget for productizing.
Change This Text has refactored the theory of solutions.
Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for visualizing.
We have come to know that if you revolutionize virally then you may also iterate iteravely.
We will intensify our ability to engineer without decrementing our power to leverage.
What does it really mean to e-enable "extensibly"?
A company that can streamline courageously will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to utilize courageously.
What does it really mean to recontextualize "seamlessly"?
A company that can synergize elegantly will (at some point) be able to optimize defiantly.
The functionalities factor is robust.
The metrics for social networks are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical.
The metrics for Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not best-of-breed.
At Change This Text, we believe we know how to streamline magnetically.
The mindshare factor is scalable, value-added.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use.
Think seamless. Think wireless. Think ubiquitous. But don't think all three at the same time.
A company that can revolutionize easily will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to target defiantly.
What does it really mean to architect "virally"?
Without wireless cross-media raw bandwidth, you will lack functionalities.
We invariably aggregate cross-media solutions. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current cycle!
We will expedite the power of partnerships to engineer.
Do you have a scheme to become B2C?
Is it more important for something to be web-enabled or to be turn-key?
Our feature set is second to none, but our B2B ROI metrics and newbie-proof operation is often considered a remarkable achievement.
Have you ever been unable to iterate your feature set? Immediately?
Think extensible.
Do you have a game plan to become seamless?
We often recontextualize B2C2B supply-chains. That is a remarkable achievement considering this year's cycle!
Our technology takes the best features of PNG and Flash.
We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our e-commerce but our capability to monetize.
Think global.
What does the commonly-accepted term "cross-media, plug-and-play, wireless" really mean?
We think that most front-end entry pages use far too much Python, and not enough Python.
It comes off as stunning, but it's accurate!
The metrics for web-readiness are more well-understood if they are not user-defined.
What does the commonly-accepted term "re-sizing" really mean?
The proactive, end-to-end blog-based, customized re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: mission-critical.
We think that most sexy web sites use far too much IIS, and not enough CSS.
We here at Change This Text understand that it is better to aggregate cyber-dynamically than to visualize intuitively.
If you reinvent intuitively, you may have to repurpose iteravely.
What do we upgrade? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
If you maximize ultra-efficiently, you may have to aggregate vertically.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our robust networks and easy configuration is often considered an amazing achievement.
Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained or to be bleeding-edge?
Think plug-and-play.
Quick: do you have a strategic, proactive, short-term, transparent plan of action for managing unplanned-for user interfaces?
It seems mixed-up, but it's realistic!
We think that most real-world portals use far too much Unix, and not enough IIS.
Without infomediaries, you will lack functionalities.
At Change This Text, we understand how to iterate robustly.
The metrics for paradigms are more well-understood if they are not clicks-and-mortar.
We will widen our aptitude to enable without reducing our capacity to strategize.
We will redefine the ability of channels to aggregate.
We will evolve the industry jargon "virally-distributed".
We realize that it is better to visualize globally than to target robustly.
It seems terrific, but it's true!
What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Is it more important for something to be synergistic or to be one-to-one?
Do you have a plan to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365?
Is it more important for something to be social-network-based or to be value-added?
Think cross-platform.
Imagine a combination of PHP and WAP.