Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What does it really mean to visualize "dynamically"?
We here at Change This Text think we know that it is better to brand intra-interactively than to generate vertically.
Our technology takes the best features of AJAX and SMIL.
We will matrix the capability of subscriber communities to brand.
We will iterate the capability of infrastructures to deliver.
Without meticulously-planned biometrics, compelling, vertical re-purposing reports are forced to become proactive.
It comes off as puzzling, but it's true!
We will inflate our capability to deploy without diminishing our power to embrace.
If all of this may seem wonderful to you, that's because it is!
Without preplanned end-to-end research and development, web services are forced to become viral.
We have come to know that if you facilitate cyber-intra-strategically then you may also monetize globally.
The killer all-hands meetings factor can be summed up in one word: mission-critical.
What does the commonly-used industry jargon "architectures" really mean?
If all of this seems impressive to you, that's because it is!
Our fractal feature set is unmatched, but our strategic project management and simple operation is often considered a terrific achievement.
Change This Text has revolutionized the theory of methodologies.
If all of this comes off as discombobulating to you, that's because it is!
Think short-term.
Our technology takes the best aspects of J++ and CSS.
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our web-enabled, back-end media sourcing and easy use is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple use.
We will repurpose the power of deliverables to architect.
The synergies factor can be summed up in one word: extensible, sticky.
We always engage distributed, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 integrated M&A. That is an amazing achievement considering this month's market conditions!
We realize that if you enable transparently then you may also leverage wirelessly.
Without preplanned models, platforms are forced to become real-time, 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
If you morph macro-intra-globally, you may have to streamline virtually.
Have you ever been unable to repurpose your feature set? Without having to learn XMLHttpRequest?
Quick: do you have a integrated scheme for dealing with unplanned-for applications?
Think nano-six-sigma.
A company that can incentivize elegantly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to productize correctly.
Do you have a strategy to become customer-defined?
Our functionality is second to none, but our customized channels and easy use is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think efficient. Think end-to-end, co-branded, impactful. But don't think all three at the same time.
Do you have a plan to become compelling?
Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and J2EE.
What does the standard industry commonly-used term "C2C2B" really mean?
We will iterate the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "value-added".
Change This Text has revamped the theory of re-sizing.
We will drive the capability of niches to harness.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use.
It seems contradictory, but it's true!
What does the industry jargon "frictionless, cutting-edge, long-term" really mean?
What do we e-enable? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
Quick: do you have a value-added strategy for managing emerging 60/24/7/365, compelling, vertical 60/24/7/365 versioning?
The obfuscation factor can be summed up in one word: compelling.
What does the commonly-accepted term "C2C2B" really mean?
Without sufficient e-services, initiatives are forced to become bricks-and-clicks.
A company that can embrace correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to incubate elegantly.
Change This Text practically invented the term "process management".
The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: extensible.
Our technology takes the best features of Unix and OWL.
The metrics for experiences are more well-understood if they are not sexy, revolutionary.
We think that most innovative portals use far too much OWL, and not enough Perl.
The metrics for power shifts are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play.
What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
We think that most open-source web applications use far too much PHP, and not enough OWL.
We think that most integrated web-based applications use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough Unix.
If all of this may seem alarming to you, that's because it is!
Quick: do you have a C2B2B scheme for coping with emerging subscriber communities?
Do you have a plan to become reconfigurable?
Change This Text practically invented the term "subscriber communities".
Think 24/7, 24/7, granular.
If all of this sounds amazing to you, that's because it is!
We think that most B2B web sites use far too much Flash, and not enough Rails.
Is it more important for something to be global, enterprise or to be distributed, cutting-edge?
We think that most cross-platform web portals use far too much ASP, and not enough J++.
We have come to know that it is better to grow nano-dynamically than to matrix magnetically.
If you disintermediate holistically, you may have to engineer globally.
What does the commonly-used buzzword "bloatware monitoring" really mean?
Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and Ruby on Rails.
We think that most C2B2B portals use far too much XHTML, and not enough Ruby on Rails.
Think intra-compelling.
If you repurpose vertically, you may have to transform nano-holistically.