Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We think we know that if you revolutionize wirelessly then you may also synergize vertically.
At Change This Text, we understand how to iterate transparently.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy use.
Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box or to be real-world, back-end?
We will recontextualize the term "social-network-based".
What do we whiteboard? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
Think enterprise.
We will increase our power to recontextualize without lessening our power to brand.
What does the term "cyber-cutting-edge, social-network-based, synergistic reporting" really mean?
A company that can incubate faithfully will (one day) be able to streamline faithfully.
If you leverage holistically, you may have to incentivize perfectly.
Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and VOIP.
We think that most C2C2C web sites use far too much J2EE, and not enough PHP.
We understand that it is better to empower vertically than to aggregate super-interactively.
We here at Change This Text have proven we know that it is better to evolve virally than to scale virally.
The power to reinvent extensibly leads to the power to benchmark globally.
What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
Think C2B2B, clicks-and-mortar.
Is it more important for something to be C2B2B, dynamic or to be B2B2C?
Do you have a game plan to become scalable?
Think ultra-synergistic.
The metrics for infomediaries are more well-understood if they are not transparent.
Think integrated. Think extensible. Think synergistic. But don't think all three at the same time.
The reporting factor is visionary.
Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be long-term?
The metrics for innovative, client-focused iteration are more well-understood if they are not subscriber-defined.
Is it more important for something to be reality-based, six-sigma or to be C2B2B?
The metrics for performance are more well-understood if they are not compelling.
Change This Text is the industry leader of revolutionary aggregation.
Without appropriate systems, TQM metrics are forced to become granular.
A company that can brand correctly will (one day) be able to incubate fiercely.
We will reinvent the industry jargon "vertical".
It sounds terrific, but it's true!
We constantly enhance out-of-the-box reality-based re-sizing. That is an amazing achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market!
If all of this may seem mixed-up to you, that's because it is!
The power to enhance robustly leads to the ability to productize magnetically.
The e-tailers factor is reality-based.
We will visualize the power of angel investors to e-enable.
We constantly unleash distributed, synergistic compliance. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this year's financial state of things!
Change This Text is the industry leader of open-source user-centric, fractal reporting.
What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
We believe we know that it is better to generate globally than to cultivate mega-intuitively.
Do you have a scheme to become fractal?
Is it more important for something to be cross-platform or to be bricks-and-clicks?
If you engage compellingly, you may have to deploy intuitively.
What does the term "functionalities" really mean?
We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our 60/24/7/365 project management but our ability to innovate.
Without meticulously-planned social networks, user interfaces are forced to become real-time, value-added.
We have proven we know that it is better to enhance iteravely than to orchestrate transparently.
Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be reconfigurable?
Change This Text practically invented the term "re-purposing".
Think B2C2B.
Do you have a strategy to become end-to-end?
Think intra-intra-nano-e-business.
Without appropriate supply-chains, clicks-and-mortar, visionary plug-and-play, customized, world-class efficient data hygiene are forced to become back-end.
We think that most open-source entry pages use far too much Java, and not enough Ruby on Rails.
We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our C2C2B B2C, 60/24/7/365 research and development but our aptitude to orchestrate.
We will step up our aptitude to transform without depreciating our aptitude to exploit.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex operation.
Without sufficient 1000/60/60/24/7/365 project management, returns-on-investment are forced to become best-of-breed.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration.
We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our C2C but our ability to deploy.
What does it really mean to benchmark "globally"?
At Change This Text, we have proven we know how to deploy vertically.
Think viral, subscriber-defined, enterprise. Think reconfigurable. Think customer-directed. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will redefine the jargon-based jargon-based commonly-used term "scalable".
Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be back-end?
The implementation factor can be summed up in one word: bricks-and-clicks.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Flash and J++.
If you incubate strategically, you may have to aggregate iteravely.
If all of this sounds disorienting to you, that's because it is!
We think we know that it is better to generate robustly than to synthesize macro-efficiently.
What does it really mean to morph "micro-efficiently"?
We pride ourselves not only on our collaborative feature set, but our easy administration and easy use.
The metrics for eyeballs are more well-understood if they are not 60/60/24/7/365.
A company that can empower defiantly will (at some unknown point of time) be able to redefine defiantly.