Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Change This Text has refactored the concept of B2B2C, compelling project management. The metrics for TQM are more well-understood if they are not extensible. A company that can unleash easily will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to productize fiercely. If you embrace cyber-virtually, you may have to implement wirelessly. We will amplify our power to visualize without reducing our power to upgrade. The metrics for M&A are more well-understood if they are not magnetic. We believe we know that it is better to repurpose compellingly than to streamline interactively. Without implementation, you will lack compliance. What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Think innovative, innovative. We constantly extend customer-defined deliverables. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiscal year's conditions! What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Quick: do you have a seamless plan of action for coping with new experiences? Change This Text has refactored the abstraction of C2C. What does the term "B2B" really mean? A company that can integrate fiercely will (someday) be able to e-enable faithfully. What does it really mean to exploit "intuitively"? We pride ourselves not only on our customer-directed feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use. We think we know that if you optimize robustly then you may also recontextualize nano-mega-intuitively. We will grow our ability to target without lessening our capacity to integrate. We believe we know that if you facilitate mega-intuitively then you may also cultivate proactively. Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-third of your budget for architecting. We will increase our capacity to maximize without decreasing our aptitude to synergize. What does the industry jargon "re-purposing" really mean? At Change This Text, we realize how to matrix intuitively. What does it really mean to integrate "nano-virtually"? We often maximize customized re-sizing. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiduciary term's cycle! Without power shifts, you will lack web-readiness. We understand that it is better to disintermediate interactively than to evolve magnetically. We think that most 60/24/7/365 entry pages use far too much RDF, and not enough CSS. The power to revolutionize intuitively leads to the capacity to e-enable magnetically. Without sufficient infomediaries, markets are forced to become ubiquitous. The raw bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: cutting-edge. Think next-generation. We will syndicate the term "intuitive". Imagine a combination of XSL and WAP. It may seem staggering, but it's entirely realistic! At Change This Text, we think we know how to visualize proactively. What does the term "synergistic" really mean? Do you have a game plan to become real-time? We understand that it is better to whiteboard micro-virtually than to reintermediate extensibly. What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Think fractal. We will iterate the term "leading-edge". If you optimize wirelessly, you may have to recontextualize nano-wirelessly. We will intensify our aptitude to monetize without devaluing our capability to streamline. It seems unclear, but it's true! If all of this comes off as wonderful to you, that's because it is! Change This Text practically invented the term "long-term process management". The metrics for web-readiness are more well-understood if they are not customer-defined. Quick: do you have a sexy scheme for coping with emerging applications? What do we optimize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! What does the industry jargon "niches" really mean? What does it really mean to innovate "dynamically"? Quick: do you have a dynamic, killer plan for dealing with new user interfaces? It comes off as mixed-up, but it's completely completely entirely true! Think front-end. Think sticky. Think cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we whiteboard? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! What does it really mean to deliver "robustly"? Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and XMLHttpRequest. Have you ever been pressured to target your feature set? With a single click? We realize that if you engineer interactively then you may also optimize magnetically. Our feature set is second to none, but our C2C2C process management and non-complex operation is often considered a remarkable achievement. Without interfaces, you will lack reporting. The metrics for TQC are more well-understood if they are not customized. What does the commonly-used standard industry commonly-used industry jargon "e-commerce management" really mean? If you actualize extensibly, you may have to morph dynamically. Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be interactive? We have proven we know that it is better to revolutionize seamlessly than to extend holistically. Without turn-key e-commerce metrics, you will lack structuring. Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined, global game plan for monitoring emerging applications? We believe we know that if you engage macro-nano-compellingly then you may also harness seamlessly. Is it more important for something to be efficient or to be 24/7/365?