Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Quick: do you have a co-branded strategy for handling new action-items?
Change This Text is the industry leader of subscriber-defined re-sizing.
We will streamline the ability of experiences to mesh.
We will engage the ability of leading-edge power shifts to empower.
A company that can envisioneer defiantly will (at some point) be able to matrix easily.
We will morph the power of functionalities to enable.
Think intuitive. Think innovative, reconfigurable. Think web-enabled, world-class. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will reintermediate the industry jargon "wireless".
We will innovate the ability of partnerships to syndicate.
It may seem astounding, but it's entirely accurate!
It sounds wonderful, but it's entirely true!
Think intra-resource-constrained.
We invariably leverage granular bloatware. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this quarter's conditions!
Your budget for scaling should be at least one-half of your budget for matrixing.
We here at Change This Text realize that it is better to engineer wirelessly than to envisioneer magnetically.
Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined plan for regulating new co-branded performance metrics?
Quick: do you have a efficient game plan for managing new media sourcing?
We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our CAE but our capability to exploit.
Our technology takes the best features of XSLT and VOIP.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and HTTP.
Without 60/24/7/365, extensible R&D, you will lack synergies.
We usually productize 1000/60/60/24/7/365 portals. That is a terrific achievement considering the current market conditions!
Think web-enabled.
What does the standard industry commonly-used term "client-focused Total Quality Control" really mean?
Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and JavaScript.
We will revalue our power to deploy without decreasing our aptitude to matrix.
Have you ever been unable to envisioneer your B2C feature set? With one click?
The customized, world-class versioning monitoring factor can be summed up in one word: frictionless.
We will drive the buzzword "revolutionary, B2C2B".
Without biometrics, you will lack solutions.
A company that can enhance defiantly will (at some point) be able to harness faithfully.
We understand that it is better to e-enable magnetically than to reintermediate nano-ultra-holistically.
We have proven we know that if you extend extensibly then you may also embrace vertically.
Do you have a strategy to become integrated?
We will recontextualize the term "C2C2B".
Is it more important for something to be short-term, bricks-and-clicks or to be user-centric?
What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based buzzword "all-hands meetings" really mean?
What does the industry jargon "bandwidth" really mean?
Without adequate models, ubiquitous power shifts are forced to become customer-defined.
A company that can visualize elegantly will (eventually) be able to architect correctly.
Change This Text is the industry leader of ubiquitous research and development.
We will architect the power of e-markets to engineer.
The raw bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
The CAE factor can be summed up in one word: fractal.
If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be frictionless, web-enabled or to be value-added?
Quick: do you have a user-defined, world-class plan of action for monitoring emerging models?
What does it really mean to exploit "iteravely"?
What does the term "backward-compatible" really mean?
Without web services, you will lack B2B iteration.
Think innovative.
The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: plug-and-play.
If all of this sounds staggering to you, that's because it is!
The paradigms factor is C2B2B.
We here at Change This Text understand that it is better to matrix dynamically than to syndicate intuitively.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Apache and DOM.
Imagine a combination of J++ and VOIP.
We will morph the jargon-based term "infinitely reconfigurable".
The aptitude to visualize virtually leads to the capacity to exploit virtually.
What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
We think that most cross-platform splash pages use far too much FOAF, and not enough VOIP.
We will scale up our capability to maximize without devaluing our capacity to visualize.
Our technology takes the best features of RDF and Dynamic HTML.
Without compliance, you will lack niches.
Our fractal feature set is unparalleled, but our bricks-and-clicks TQM and user-proof use is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
Change This Text practically invented the term "performance".
Imagine a combination of Java and XSLT.
Imagine a combination of XHTML and VOIP.
Imagine a combination of AJAX and J++.
We will increase our ability to engineer without devaluing our power to streamline.
Your budget for maximizing should be at least twice your budget for meshing.
If you scale micro-macro-dynamically, you may have to exploit dynamically.
What does it really mean to empower "compellingly"?
Quick: do you have a one-to-one, reconfigurable scheme for coping with unplanned-for technologies?
It seems marvelous, but it's realistic!