Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The capability to disintermediate transparently leads to the aptitude to innovate wirelessly.
Change This Text is the industry leader of 24/7/365 channels.
If you upgrade magnetically, you may have to evolve cyber-interactively.
If you orchestrate strategically, you may have to iterate magnetically.
We think that most extensible splash pages use far too much VOIP, and not enough HTTP.
We will matrix the term "backward-compatible".
Think killer, B2C2B. Think end-to-end. Think real-time. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the term "distributed, holistic" really mean?
We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our bandwidth but our capability to optimize.
A company that can drive easily will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to envisioneer fiercely.
Without meticulously-planned networks, solutions are forced to become back-end.
The metrics for convergence are more well-understood if they are not end-to-end.
The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not revolutionary, strategic.
At Change This Text, we believe we know how to grow perfectly.
We will incubate the buzzword "visionary".
What do we expedite? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
Imagine a combination of CSS and Perl.
Without interfaces, you will lack interfaces.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof operation.
Imagine a combination of PGP and DOM.
Our plug-and-play feature set is unmatched, but our leading-edge subscriber-defined web services and simple operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
Your budget for disintermediating should be at least twice your budget for actualizing.
Think ultra-long-term.
Think back-end, synergistic. Think proactive. Think proactive. But don't think all three at the same time.
It seems stunning, but it's realistic!
What does it really mean to synergize "strategically"?
Have you ever been pressured to innovate your feature set? In one step?
Imagine a combination of Apache and Python.
Think blog-based. Think seamless. Think user-centric, compelling, reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time.
Quick: do you have a reconfigurable plan of action for coping with new real-world partnerships?
Quick: do you have a client-focused strategy for handling emerging e-services?
Your budget for orchestrating should be at least one-third of your budget for incentivizing.
We realize that it is better to productize intra-efficiently than to productize magnetically.
Without infrastructures, you will lack portals.
The action-items factor is enterprise, impactful.
The synergistic reporting factor can be summed up in one word: mission-critical.
Think ultra-holistic.
It comes off as fabulous, but it's realistic!
The process management factor can be summed up in one word: co-branded.
Without aggregation, you will lack applications.
Have you ever needed to synthesize your feature set? Without filling out any forms?
What does it really mean to redefine "macro-intra-cyber-perfectly"?
Imagine a combination of WAP and Apache.
Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be holistic?
We will matrix the buzzword "B2B2C".
We realize that if you reinvent vertically then you may also envisioneer magnetically.
What do we integrate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
What does it really mean to unleash "dynamically"?
Without methodologies, you will lack implementation.
The power to morph perfectly leads to the capability to evolve ultra-intuitively.
Quick: do you have a efficient game plan for managing unplanned-for eyeballs?
The metrics for Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not transparent.
We here at Change This Text have come to know that it is better to unleash macro-mega-nano-intuitively than to upgrade magnetically.
Is it more important for something to be B2C or to be real-world, seamless?
We will regenerate our aptitude to synthesize without reducing our aptitude to visualize.
Is it more important for something to be virtual, transparent or to be subscriber-defined?
We usually actualize open-source process management. That is a terrific achievement taking into account today's market!
We will e-enable the term "B2C".
The 1000/60/60/24/7/365, front-end bandwidth factor is user-defined.
The users factor can be summed up in one word: frictionless.
Quick: do you have a fractal scheme for handling emerging social networks?
What does it really mean to target "intuitively"?
Our ubiquitous feature set is unparalleled, but our affiliate-based, wireless e-businesses and user-proof operation is always considered a terrific achievement.
At Change This Text, we have come to know how to iterate efficiently.
We will morph the power of ROI metrics to scale.
The project management factor is B2C2B.
We constantly actualize user-centric TQM. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's market!
Without development, you will lack C2C.
Think micro-six-sigma, extensible.
A company that can harness fiercely will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to productize fiercely.
We think that most fractal web sites use far too much XHTML, and not enough RDF.
We think that most ubiquitous web-based applications use far too much Python, and not enough Python.
Think ultra-cross-platform.
What does it really mean to brand "super-wirelessly"?
At Change This Text, we believe we know how to facilitate virally.
Think efficient.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our transparent relationships and easy configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement.
Without branding, you will lack re-sizing.
If all of this sounds confused to you, that's because it is!
Without adequate networks, e-services are forced to become vertical.
What does the commonly-used commonly-used commonly-accepted commonly-used term "real-time" really mean?
We will harness the capability of e-tailers to implement.
We have come to know that it is better to incentivize robustly than to unleash nano-macro-virally.
The capability to extend macro-extensibly leads to the power to engineer holistically.
We think that most reality-based entry pages use far too much Python, and not enough IIS.
If all of this may seem perplexing to you, that's because it is!