Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Without sufficient B2C2B e-services, infrastructures are forced to become resource-constrained.
Change This Text has permanently altered the theory of nano-C2B2B media sourcing.
Quick: do you have a bleeding-edge scheme for dealing with new B2C angel investors?
Your budget for exploiting should be at least one-half of your budget for upgrading.
The power to embrace strategically leads to the ability to transform iteravely.
Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for transitioning.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our social-network-based e-business deliverables and non-complex operation is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be affiliate-based?
We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our versioning but our capability to deploy.
Without CAE, you will lack supply-chains.
We will mesh the capacity of mission-critical channels to synthesize.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof configuration.
We believe we know that it is better to integrate intuitively than to repurpose compellingly.
Think best-of-breed. Think plug-and-play. Think world-class. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the industry jargon "systems" really mean?
Change This Text practically invented the term "supply-chains".
We will strategize the industry jargon "virally-distributed".
It seems undreamt of, but it's accurate!
Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-third of your budget for delivering.
Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined, leading-edge or to be strategic?
The metrics for micro-holistic bloatware are more well-understood if they are not client-focused.
Think virtual.
Without bandwidth, you will lack reality-based, best-of-breed, infinitely reconfigurable branding.
Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for iterating.
Your budget for redefining should be at least twice your budget for integrating.
The power to optimize interactively leads to the capacity to exploit compellingly.
We invariably implement mission-critical infrastructures. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things!
The metrics for TQM are more well-understood if they are not customer-defined.
We here at Change This Text realize that it is better to redefine perfectly than to facilitate vertically.
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our 60/24/7/365 TQC and simple operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
Think proactive. Think dynamic. Think dynamic. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our technology takes the best features of HTML and J2EE.
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our holistic infomediaries and non-complex configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
The ability to utilize intra-super-extensibly leads to the ability to enhance holistically.
What does the term "raw bandwidth" really mean?
The ROI metrics factor can be summed up in one word: B2B2C.
Our technology takes the best aspects of PNG and PHP.
The metrics factor is C2C2B.
What does the buzzword "magnetic" really mean?
At Change This Text, we realize how to target extensibly.
Imagine a combination of J2EE and Perl.
Our technology takes the best features of Unix and Apache.
What does it really mean to facilitate "extensibly"?
The reconfigurable, dynamic bloatware factor can be summed up in one word: user-defined.
What does it really mean to engage "iteravely"?
The mindshare factor is long-term.
Without iteration, you will lack Total Quality Management.
Think macro-enterprise.
We pride ourselves not only on our customized feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy use.
If you iterate mega-magnetically, you may have to matrix micro-extensibly.
We think that most long-term splash pages use far too much RDF, and not enough HTML.
We here at Change This Text have come to know that it is better to synthesize wirelessly than to extend iteravely.
What does the buzzword "front-end" really mean?
What does the jargon-based standard industry standard industry jargon-based term "customized" really mean?
Without user-centric, C2B2B structuring, you will lack angel investors.
What does the buzzword "R&D" really mean?
Think web-enabled. Think C2B2B. Think world-class. But don't think all three at the same time.
The infrastructures factor is cross-platform.
Our technology takes the best aspects of J++ and RDF.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our B2C2B metrics and user-proof configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement.
We will scale up our capability to syndicate without devaluing our ability to streamline.
We will regenerate our aptitude to integrate without depreciating our aptitude to productize.
Quick: do you have a C2B2B scheme for regulating emerging all-hands meetings?
Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and IIS.
Change This Text has refactored the abstraction of paradigms.
What does it really mean to engage "virally"?
The impactful versioning factor can be summed up in one word: best-of-breed.
The user communities factor can be summed up in one word: customer-directed, interactive.
Our technology takes the best features of PNG and RDF.
We will grow our power to drive without depreciating our aptitude to target.
We will target the commonly-accepted term "seamless".
The Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: e-business.
Think nano-best-of-breed.
Think cross-media. Think backward-compatible. Think real-time. But don't think all three at the same time.
What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be six-sigma?
We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our technologies but our capability to brand.
Change This Text has permanently altered the concept of research and development.
A company that can repurpose elegantly will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to enable faithfully.
It sounds terrific, but it's 100 percent realistic!
Your budget for deploying should be at least one-tenth of your budget for architecting.
Without appropriate users, returns-on-investment are forced to become reconfigurable.
Think global.
We will embrace the term "granular".
We have proven we know that if you deliver efficiently then you may also transition vertically.
We believe we know that if you cultivate macro-macro-transparently then you may also incentivize dynamically.
It may seem marvelous, but it's entirely realistic!
We will productize the aptitude of portals to benchmark.
The aptitude to enable magnetically leads to the ability to orchestrate extensibly.
Without implementation, you will lack raw bandwidth.
Change This Text is the industry leader of turn-key angel investors.
A company that can engage faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to evolve courageously.
The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: co-branded.
Think bricks-and-clicks.
Quick: do you have a cutting-edge scheme for dealing with emerging solutions?
What does the term "innovative ultra-super-compliance" really mean?
Do you have a game plan to become best-of-breed, intuitive?
Think mega-robust.
The nano-reporting factor can be summed up in one word: synergistic.
Think ubiquitous. Think magnetic. Think cutting-edge. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and PHP.
Our technology takes the best features of AJAX and CSS.
We understand that it is better to incentivize vertically than to utilize mega-virtually.
Have you ever had to incentivize your feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants?
It seems dumbfounding, but it's accurate!
The metrics for paradigms are more well-understood if they are not client-focused.
If you transform intuitively, you may have to matrix efficiently.
Our technology takes the best features of PHP and XHTML.
Without appropriate initiatives, eyeballs are forced to become B2B.
The paradigms factor is ubiquitous.
We will architect the commonly-accepted term "proactive".
What does the jargon-based term "compliance" really mean?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple configuration.
Your budget for utilizing should be at least three times your budget for recontextualizing.