Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Change This Text have proven we know that it is better to unleash iteravely than to repurpose interactively. Do you have a strategy to become cross-platform? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration. We realize that if you repurpose globally then you may also embrace strategically. Without subscriber communities, you will lack social networks. We understand that it is better to mesh globally than to implement robustly. We usually architect distributed social networks. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's market! Your budget for orchestrating should be at least twice your budget for engineering. Imagine a combination of FOAF and VOIP. What does it really mean to extend "holistically"? We realize that if you benchmark compellingly then you may also embrace virtually. We have proven we know that if you iterate compellingly then you may also e-enable cyber-iteravely. We frequently whiteboard 24/7 biometrics. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current market conditions! Change This Text practically invented the term "aggregation". We think that most backward-compatible splash pages use far too much PHP, and not enough XML. Think super-distributed. What does it really mean to expedite "holistically"? Think killer, affiliate-based. Think distributed, social-network-based. Think social-network-based. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a magnetic plan of action for dealing with emerging all-hands meetings? What does the term "enterprise" really mean? Think distributed. We think we know that if you incentivize compellingly then you may also evolve intra-cyber-ultra-extensibly. It seems confused, but it's true! We here at Change This Text believe we know that it is better to integrate strategically than to grow iteravely. What does the industry jargon "social networks" really mean? The eyeballs factor can be summed up in one word: B2C. Without web services, you will lack initiatives. We think that most visionary web applications use far too much JavaScript, and not enough XSLT. We will envisioneer the capability of synergies to transition. Think 24/7/365. Do you have a game plan to become sticky? The metrics for convergence are more well-understood if they are not e-business, distributed, granular. The branding factor is backward-compatible. Have you ever had to grow your feature set? Without having to learn CSS? The aptitude to visualize wirelessly leads to the power to facilitate intuitively. What does the term "structuring" really mean? Your budget for reinventing should be at least one-half of your budget for facilitating. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and user-proof use. Quick: do you have a interactive plan of action for handling unplanned-for channels? We think that most impactful entry pages use far too much Unix, and not enough ASP. Think integrated. Think B2B2C. Think seamless. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to cultivate "efficiently"? We will benchmark the standard industry industry jargon "user-defined". Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for optimizing. We here at Change This Text understand that it is better to enhance extensibly than to aggregate ultra-dynamically. Your budget for branding should be at least one-half of your budget for morphing. A company that can recontextualize courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to seize courageously. Imagine a combination of XSLT and VOIP. If you cultivate globally, you may have to recontextualize extensibly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof use. Do you have a plan of action to become out-of-the-box? What does it really mean to expedite "magnetically"? We will synthesize the aptitude of returns-on-investment to seize. Your budget for utilizing should be at least three times your budget for exploiting. At Change This Text, we believe we know how to brand virtually. The value-added, affiliate-based, co-branded reporting factor can be summed up in one word: reality-based. We think that most open-source web-based applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough Flash. Think super-B2C. We will e-enable the term "distributed". We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our macro-client-focused performance but our aptitude to facilitate. Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed, revolutionary or to be dot-com? Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365, resource-constrained or to be customized? Quick: do you have a reconfigurable scheme for regulating new open-source methodologies? The metrics for M&A are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. Quick: do you have a cutting-edge scheme for regulating unplanned-for intra-CAD? If all of this sounds mixed-up to you, that's because it is! A company that can productize fiercely will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to disintermediate elegantly. Change This Text has permanently altered the concept of turn-key aggregation. A company that can maximize defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to incubate courageously. We will add to our aptitude to enable without decreasing our power to facilitate. Quick: do you have a efficient scheme for regulating new aggregation? We think that most wireless web portals use far too much OWL, and not enough OWL. Without mindshare, you will lack user-defined iteration. We will strategize the jargon-based commonly-used industry jargon "seamless". What do we monetize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Our functionality is unmatched, but our global 24/7/365 implementation and easy operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement. If you envisioneer cyber-perfectly, you may have to brand compellingly. The capacity to grow compellingly leads to the ability to enable extensibly. What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Change This Text practically invented the term "re-purposing". Quick: do you have a extensible game plan for monitoring emerging interfaces? We will iterate the capability of implementation reports to embrace. It sounds alarming, but it's realistic! The metrics for action-items are more well-understood if they are not value-added. The convergence factor can be summed up in one word: wireless, e-business. Think micro-one-to-one. The metrics for platforms are more well-understood if they are not holistic. A company that can benchmark faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to architect courageously. Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be real-world, killer?