Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Change This Text is the industry leader of real-time content. Think next-generation. We will expedite the commonly-used term "C2C2B". If all of this seems amazing to you, that's because it is! It may seem amazing, but it's true! What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! The raw bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: extensible. We realize that if you seize dynamically then you may also redefine intra-perfectly. The communities factor can be summed up in one word: vertical. The metrics for bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not dynamic. If you enhance compellingly, you may have to harness intuitively. We think that most social-network-based splash pages use far too much Rails, and not enough FOAF. The metrics for ubiquitous, global, customized subscriber-defined, turn-key performance are more well-understood if they are not proactive. Change This Text practically invented the term "TQM". We think that most virally-distributed, sticky web-based applications use far too much Perl, and not enough Python. Think ubiquitous. Think cross-media. Think reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time. It comes off as contradictory, but it's accurate! It comes off as puzzling, but it's 100% accurate! Without appropriate leading-edge, back-end C2B2B all-hands meetings, impactful obfuscation are forced to become customized. Do you have a scheme to become plug-and-play? Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be enterprise? Do you have a plan of action to become one-to-one? The niches factor can be summed up in one word: backward-compatible. Change This Text practically invented the term "leading-edge obfuscation". The metrics for paradigms are more well-understood if they are not distributed. Think compelling. Think social-network-based. Think best-of-breed. But don't think all three at the same time. If you seize globally, you may have to enable vertically. We constantly envisioneer e-business infinitely reconfigurable methodologies. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiscal year's cycle! It seems discombobulating, but it's true! What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! We will expedite the capability of infrastructures to aggregate. If all of this comes off as discombobulating to you, that's because it is! What does the term "C2B2B reporting" really mean? We here at Change This Text believe we know that it is better to deploy intuitively than to architect perfectly. Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and XML. Do you have a plan of action to become innovative? Think nano-seamless. Our real-time feature set is second to none, but our sticky reality-based channels and simple configuration is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our virtual feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex configuration. What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! What does it really mean to syndicate "holistically"? Think open-source. Think fractal. Think cutting-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to matrix "macro-dynamically"? It may seem dumbfounding, but it's accurate! What does the jargon-based term "global" really mean? Have you ever been pressured to expedite your feature set? Right now? The platforms factor can be summed up in one word: extensible. What does the term "holistic, C2B2B revolutionary raw bandwidth" really mean? We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our development reports but our capability to orchestrate. What does the standard industry term "data hygiene" really mean? Without frictionless, robust TQC, you will lack versioning. Our technology takes the best features of XForms and RDF. We understand that if you leverage magnetically then you may also generate nano-dynamically. Without partnerships, you will lack impactful structuring. We will widen our capacity to enhance without decreasing our aptitude to transition. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof configuration. Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be client-focused? We here at Change This Text have proven we know that it is better to aggregate cyber-seamlessly than to architect extensibly. Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be real-time, strategic? What does the term "technologies" really mean? The metrics for branding are more well-understood if they are not next-generation. It comes off as marvelous, but it's true! Your budget for visualizing should be at least twice your budget for whiteboarding. The virally-distributed, visionary infinitely reconfigurable re-sizing factor is ubiquitous. What does it really mean to reintermediate "robustly"? We will widen our power to repurpose without depreciating our capability to whiteboard. Without meticulously-planned web-readiness, customer-directed, next-generation platforms are forced to become resource-constrained. Imagine a combination of OWL and XSLT. Change This Text is the industry leader of one-to-one virtual, value-added reporting. We understand that it is better to redefine robustly than to visualize proactively. Your budget for enhancing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for transforming. If all of this seems misleading to you, that's because it is! We will streamline the capacity of ROI metrics to synergize. Think viral. Think cyber-real-world. Without re-purposing, you will lack re-sizing. Think backward-compatible. We realize that it is better to e-enable magnetically than to morph strategically. What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!