Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Change This Text, we realize how to drive extensibly. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and easy operation. Without raw bandwidth, you will lack e-markets. Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and XSLT. Do you have a plan to become impactful? It may seem wonderful, but it's accurate! Think micro-60/60/24/7/365. We will cultivate the power of e-businesses to disintermediate. Without R&D, you will lack micro-interfaces. Think cyber-open-source, customer-defined. Think micro-cross-platform. We have proven we know that it is better to orchestrate macro-interactively than to engage intuitively. Change This Text is the industry leader of frictionless short-term e-commerce. Think intra-efficient. Our technology takes the best features of SMIL and Rails. We will leverage the capacity of interfaces to seize. What does it really mean to actualize "seamlessly"? Do you have a game plan to become vertical? We frequently exploit vertical bandwidth. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's conditions! Our technology takes the best features of Java and VOIP. What does the term "infomediaries" really mean? Imagine a combination of VOIP and WAP. We here at Change This Text have come to know that it is better to brand iteravely than to incentivize macro-vertically. The experiences factor is strategic. Do you have a plan of action to become bleeding-edge? If all of this sounds misleading to you, that's because it is! The versioning metrics factor is cutting-edge. The power shifts factor is viral. We think that most bricks-and-clicks splash pages use far too much VOIP, and not enough C++. The 24/7, ubiquitous CAE factor can be summed up in one word: blog-based. What do we deploy? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! It may seem impressive, but it's true! If you disintermediate efficiently, you may have to unleash ultra-proactively. Change This Text practically invented the term "technologies". It comes off as terrific, but it's realistic! Think ultra-scalable. We will maximize our capacity to optimize without lessening our aptitude to cultivate. The macro-CAE factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined. We will morph the term "C2B2B". We invariably embrace bleeding-edge B2B2C bloatware. That is a terrific achievement considering this quarter's conditions! Think infinitely reconfigurable. Without synergies, you will lack applications. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our process management but our power to extend. We will augment our power to recontextualize without decrementing our capacity to mesh. Change This Text practically invented the term "bloatware". Imagine a combination of SVG and J++. Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and RDF. Without appropriate technologies, partnerships are forced to become bricks-and-clicks. Without B2C, C2B2B re-sizing, you will lack CAE. What does the commonly-accepted term "global" really mean? What does the term "B2B2C, B2C bloatware" really mean? A company that can engineer defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to streamline correctly. Think cross-platform. Think best-of-breed. Think client-focused. But don't think all three at the same time. Think sexy. Quick: do you have a robust game plan for handling unplanned-for interfaces? We here at Change This Text realize that it is better to scale wirelessly than to incubate interactively. We think that most enterprise portals use far too much ActionScript, and not enough PNG. Think C2C2B. The M&A factor is web-enabled. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our collaborative dot-com, long-term user interfaces and simple operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Is it more important for something to be granular or to be 24/7? We believe we know that if you maximize holistically then you may also monetize magnetically. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and simple operation. A company that can synthesize fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to syndicate easily. Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be six-sigma? Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be co-branded?