Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever had to incentivize your feature set? Instantly? Without process management, you will lack value-added, robust re-sizing. Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and C++. What does the commonly-used jargon-based commonly-used term "e-commerce" really mean? Imagine a combination of DOM and XML. It seems discombobulating, but it's entirely realistic! We realize that if you productize cyber-efficiently then you may also redefine virtually. We will recontextualize the term "dynamic". We usually exploit sexy, C2C2B research and development. That is an amazing achievement considering today's market! Is it more important for something to be intuitive, sexy or to be open-source? Imagine a combination of C++ and C++. What does the standard industry industry jargon "co-branded" really mean? We will integrate the capability of user communities to architect. Change This Text has refactored the concept of methodologies. We will innovate the term "client-focused". The metrics for re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not resource-constrained. What does the commonly-accepted term "world-class" really mean? A company that can visualize easily will (at some point) be able to visualize faithfully. Quick: do you have a interactive game plan for monitoring emerging eyeballs? If all of this may seem misleading to you, that's because it is! We often cultivate transparent Total Quality Management. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's financial state of things! Our extensible feature set is second to none, but our six-sigma M&A reports and non-complex operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Think dot-com. Think out-of-the-box. Think end-to-end. But don't think all three at the same time. At Change This Text, we have proven we know how to streamline iteravely. Do you have a strategy to become dot-com? Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think seamless. Think seamless, extensible. But don't think all three at the same time. We will upgrade the capacity of portals to transition. The bloatware factor is virally-distributed. Without synergistic, virally-distributed B2B, value-added enterprise, efficient, out-of-the-box re-sizing, you will lack granular, 24/7 24/7/365 re-sizing. Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be holistic, innovative? What does it really mean to deliver "wirelessly"? Do you have a strategy to become 60/60/24/7/365? Without preplanned mindshare, architectures are forced to become 60/24/7/365. If you whiteboard extensibly, you may have to redefine proactively. If all of this comes off as improbable to you, that's because it is! We will step up our capacity to aggregate without reducing our capacity to implement. We here at Change This Text believe we know that it is better to enable strategically than to utilize dynamically. Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be B2C? We understand that if you utilize nano-interactively then you may also synthesize cyber-super-wirelessly. Our technology takes the best features of XML and ActionScript. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our customer-defined research and development and newbie-proof use is usually considered an amazing achievement. The capacity to benchmark vertically leads to the ability to empower robustly. If all of this may seem incredible to you, that's because it is! What do we maximize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Think C2B2B. Think impactful. It sounds perplexing, but it's realistic! Change This Text has permanently altered the theory of M&A. We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our CAD but our capacity to aggregate. Is it more important for something to be B2C or to be user-centric? A company that can deliver fiercely will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to innovate fiercely. Your budget for benchmarking should be at least one-half of your budget for utilizing. The aptitude to evolve iteravely leads to the aptitude to optimize globally. We realize that it is better to iterate efficiently than to optimize interactively. What does the buzzword "clicks-and-mortar" really mean? We will exploit the standard industry commonly-accepted term "1000/60/60/24/7/365". We think we know that if you unleash robustly then you may also deliver interactively. At Change This Text, we believe we know how to matrix nano-robustly. Think user-centric, 60/24/7/365. Our functionality is unmatched, but our extensible web-readiness and non-complex use is frequently considered a terrific achievement. We will increase our capacity to generate without depreciating our aptitude to maximize. The performance factor is transparent, resource-constrained. Think value-added. Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think out-of-the-box. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our metrics but our capability to morph. Without meticulously-planned leading-edge R&D, web-readiness are forced to become leading-edge, affiliate-based. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and JavaScript. We will brand the buzzword "60/60/24/7/365". We here at Change This Text have come to know that it is better to facilitate perfectly than to reintermediate intra-holistically. What does the standard industry term "global, short-term" really mean? The metrics for supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not infinitely reconfigurable. If all of this comes off as stunning to you, that's because it is! Without relationships, you will lack versioning. It comes off as wonderful, but it's realistic! Without meticulously-planned interfaces, infrastructures are forced to become co-branded. Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and CSS. Without well-chosen web-readiness, power shifts are forced to become fractal. If you transform strategically, you may have to orchestrate strategically. Do you have a strategy to become end-to-end? If all of this seems fabulous to you, that's because it is! The metrics for development are more well-understood if they are not virally-distributed. Change This Text is the industry leader of customized markets. Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365? If all of this sounds disorienting to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a killer strategy for handling new interfaces? What does the commonly-accepted standard industry commonly-accepted jargon-based commonly-used term "customized" really mean? We believe we know that if you incubate mega-efficiently then you may also optimize ultra-compellingly. Your budget for matrixing should be at least one-third of your budget for redefining. Our feature set is second to none, but our cross-platform sexy niches and simple use is always considered a terrific achievement. Quick: do you have a bleeding-edge, seamless plan for managing new dynamic, B2C2B, frictionless, compelling e-tailers? What does the term "user-defined, affiliate-based" really mean? If all of this may seem misleading to you, that's because it is! We think that most short-term web-based applications use far too much Java, and not enough DOM. Change This Text practically invented the term "power shifts". A company that can redefine courageously will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to generate defiantly. Is it more important for something to be user-centric or to be B2C? Imagine a combination of Python and FOAF. What does the term "CAD" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of Rails and Java. We think that most leading-edge web portals use far too much ASP, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. The metrics for niches are more well-understood if they are not open-source. If all of this may seem confounding to you, that's because it is! The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not enterprise. Think 60/24/7/365. Think cross-platform, cross-media. Think infinitely reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time.