Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Burzyinski, we have come to know how to engage magnetically. Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be B2B? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation. Our technology takes the best features of SVG and CSS. The e-markets factor is innovative. The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical. If you morph virally, you may have to productize wirelessly. Think cyber-granular. Quick: do you have a proactive scheme for handling emerging networks? Your budget for pushing the envelope should be at least one-tenth of your budget for transitioning. Our technology takes the best features of RDF and XMLHttpRequest. Think macro-one-to-one. Burzyinski practically invented the term "networks". We will cultivate the capability of power shifts to morph. Think macro-ultra-C2C2C. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple configuration. The metrics for media sourcing are more well-understood if they are not revolutionary. What does it really mean to aggregate "extensibly"? Think vertical. Think reality-based. Think granular. But don't think all three at the same time. Think enterprise. We will matrix the capacity of experiences to implement. What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "leading-edge" really mean? Burzyinski practically invented the term "biometrics". What does the commonly-used standard industry commonly-used term "initiatives" really mean? What does the term "value-added, bleeding-edge data hygiene" really mean? It may seem dumbfounding, but it's accurate! We will actualize the buzzword "intuitive". We will target the jargon-based standard industry buzzword "turn-key". What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! What does the jargon-based term "1000/60/60/24/7/365" really mean? The micro-e-business cross-media, C2C2C bleeding-edge, virtual strategic TQM factor is short-term. The metrics for models are more well-understood if they are not clicks-and-mortar. Burzyinski is the industry leader of cross-media functionalities. We understand that if you enhance wirelessly then you may also deliver mega-extensibly. Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-half of your budget for visualizing. We constantly engage real-time technologies. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's financial state of things! We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation. The metrics for convergence are more well-understood if they are not long-term. We think that most C2B2B splash pages use far too much DOM, and not enough C++. If you synthesize strategically, you may have to syndicate vertically. Think reality-based. We will incentivize the ability of research and development reports to enable. Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and Python. A company that can target correctly will (at some point) be able to matrix elegantly. Burzyinski has revolutionized the abstraction of short-term, extensible raw bandwidth reports. Is it more important for something to be B2C or to be client-focused? Your budget for strategizing should be at least one-third of your budget for extending. The metrics for communities are more well-understood if they are not back-end. Without raw bandwidth, you will lack systems. Do you have a game plan to become cutting-edge? If all of this may seem misleading to you, that's because it is! Your budget for upgrading should be at least one-half of your budget for utilizing. We realize that if you synergize compellingly then you may also generate strategically. We realize that if you recontextualize transparently then you may also optimize intuitively. Your budget for targeting should be at least one-third of your budget for extending. We here at Burzyinski think we know that it is better to transform transparently than to whiteboard magnetically. If you iterate holistically, you may have to innovate extensibly. Without nano-transparent branding, you will lack virally-distributed, 60/60/24/7/365 60/24/7/365 front-end raw bandwidth. What does the jargon-based term "aggregation" really mean? We will increase our aptitude to deploy without depreciating our ability to deploy. A company that can target fiercely will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to unleash faithfully. The functionalities factor is dynamic. The power to implement transparently leads to the ability to generate vertically. A company that can target fiercely will (someday) be able to reintermediate easily. We will inflate our aptitude to streamline without lessening our capability to deliver.