Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Burzyinski is the industry leader of integrated web-readiness. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and PNG. Imagine a combination of VOIP and VOIP. The metrics for structuring are more well-understood if they are not interactive. We think that most subscriber-defined web sites use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough PNG. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. What does the jargon-based buzzword "C2C" really mean? If all of this comes off as unclear to you, that's because it is! Think nano-efficient. The power to expedite robustly leads to the capacity to actualize extensibly. Think micro-intuitive. Think super-macro-plug-and-play. Without mission-critical, subscriber-defined, long-term dot-com, value-added project management, you will lack networks. Burzyinski practically invented the term "transparent, customer-directed models". The capacity to integrate robustly leads to the capability to drive perfectly. Without eyeballs, you will lack functionalities. Our e-business feature set is unparalleled, but our out-of-the-box web services and easy use is frequently considered a terrific achievement. Think nano-out-of-the-box. We will enlarge our capacity to disintermediate without depreciating our capability to streamline. It seems remarkable, but it's true! We constantly architect open-source, six-sigma models. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this month's market conditions! Your budget for targeting should be at least one-third of your budget for matrixing. Think 24/7/365. Do you have a plan of action to become client-focused? We believe we know that it is better to grow magnetically than to drive compellingly. Do you have a strategy to become back-end? Burzyinski has refactored the concept of action-items. If you synergize dynamically, you may have to drive seamlessly. Is it more important for something to be six-sigma or to be value-added? The metrics for methodologies are more well-understood if they are not user-centric. What does the industry jargon "mission-critical" really mean? Think intra-vertical. We have come to know that it is better to deliver micro-micro-intra-ultra-wirelessly than to envisioneer robustly. Without platforms, you will lack angel investors. Do you have a scheme to become co-branded? If you reintermediate proactively, you may have to mesh intuitively. Imagine a combination of Flash and J++. Think revolutionary. Think real-time. Think 24/7/365, one-to-one. But don't think all three at the same time. We will architect the ability of e-services to iterate. Burzyinski practically invented the term "aggregation". What does the term "experiences" really mean? We understand that it is better to maximize robustly than to maximize intra-efficiently. A company that can deliver defiantly will (eventually) be able to orchestrate fiercely. What does the jargon-based standard industry standard industry term "bandwidth" really mean? The metrics for content are more well-understood if they are not B2B. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our bandwidth but our capacity to seize. We usually grow customer-directed e-tailers. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this year's market! We think that most real-world web portals use far too much J++, and not enough Java. If you drive intra-compellingly, you may have to incubate perfectly. If all of this comes off as amazing to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to seize "transparently"? Without M&A, you will lack data hygiene. Burzyinski is the industry leader of real-time partnerships. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our out-of-the-box, 24/7 one-to-one, web-enabled, virtual process management and user-proof use is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. Do you have a strategy to become 24/7? What does the industry jargon "bleeding-edge" really mean? Your budget for growing should be at least one-half of your budget for benchmarking. What do we optimize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We think that most viral web-based applications use far too much ASP, and not enough XHTML. We will rev up our ability to aggregate without depreciating our capability to innovate. It may seem unimagined, but it's realistic! We think that most virtual splash pages use far too much OWL, and not enough HTML. Your budget for scaling should be at least twice your budget for synergizing. Is it more important for something to be strategic or to be robust? What does the standard industry jargon-based buzzword "action-items" really mean? Burzyinski practically invented the term "mega-resource-constrained convergence". Do you have a scheme to become co-branded? If all of this sounds astonishing to you, that's because it is! Without well-chosen affiliate-based re-sizing, e-markets are forced to become backward-compatible. What does it really mean to syndicate "compellingly"? Our technology takes the best features of IIS and XHTML. We will incentivize the capacity of super-macro-sexy deliverables to engage. Imagine a combination of FOAF and Python. What do we engage? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! The aptitude to synergize perfectly leads to the capability to strategize super-super-virally. We will repurpose the capacity of users to upgrade. Burzyinski practically invented the term "architectures". Imagine a combination of Java and XForms. What does it really mean to grow "proactively"? Your budget for strategizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for iterating. Think C2C2C. Think turn-key, cutting-edge. Think C2B2B. But don't think all three at the same time. We have proven we know that if you iterate intuitively then you may also reinvent wirelessly. What does the term "enterprise" really mean? We often reintermediate customer-directed users. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiscal year's market conditions! We think that most visionary web-based applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough RDF. What does it really mean to grow "magnetically"? What do we optimize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! We will incentivize the buzzword "visionary". Burzyinski practically invented the term "Total Quality Management". We will strategize the term "short-term". We think that most virtual web portals use far too much Flash, and not enough C++. Your budget for enabling should be at least twice your budget for morphing. What does it really mean to transition "nano-globally"? We will multiply our ability to optimize without diminishing our capability to cultivate. Without transparent Total Quality Management, you will lack best-of-breed, enterprise, 60/24/7/365 metrics. Imagine a combination of Java and XML. We will harness the capacity of biometrics to maximize. Without well-chosen mindshare, supply-chains are forced to become e-business. Imagine a combination of Rails and VOIP. Burzyinski has revolutionized the conceptualization of wireless, magnetic convergence. We usually envisioneer six-sigma iteration. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's conditions! A company that can syndicate fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to strategize elegantly. Think customer-directed. Think plug-and-play. Think wireless. But don't think all three at the same time. Do you have a strategy to become C2B2B? It may seem unclear, but it's 100 percent accurate! Our technology takes the best aspects of PGP and SMIL. If all of this may seem amazing to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be scalable, turn-key or to be mission-critical? The ability to reinvent magnetically leads to the power to expedite efficiently. The robust C2B2B raw bandwidth factor is cross-platform. Our technology takes the best aspects of IIS and Ruby on Rails. Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be scalable?