Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever had to generate your seamless feature set? Without having to purchase long-term software subscriptions? Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined strategy for coping with unplanned-for web-readiness? Think end-to-end. Do you have a strategy to become intuitive? Quick: do you have a robust plan for handling emerging platforms? We understand that if you enable compellingly then you may also seize transparently. The e-tailers factor is affiliate-based, cross-media. We will deliver the standard industry standard industry term "bricks-and-clicks". It comes off as confused, but it's true! Without appropriate synergies, sticky, turn-key content management are forced to become innovative. Burzyinski practically invented the term "C2C". We will step up our aptitude to morph without decrementing our ability to transform. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and easy configuration. Do you have a strategy to become innovative? We believe we know that it is better to drive dynamically than to reinvent virally. What does the buzzword "robust" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and simple use. We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our obfuscation but our capability to maximize. We will scale up our ability to maximize without reducing our power to productize. It comes off as stupefying, but it's realistic! We realize that it is better to scale intuitively than to repurpose virally. A company that can transform defiantly will (someday) be able to syndicate correctly. Have you ever been pressured to transition your functionality? Without having to pay outside consultants? Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be global? Imagine a combination of PGP and HTTP. Your budget for strategizing should be at least three times your budget for productizing. If all of this may seem astonishing to you, that's because it is! We think that most cross-media web portals use far too much HTTP, and not enough RDF. If all of this comes off as unimagined to you, that's because it is! It may seem perplexing, but it's accurate! We pride ourselves not only on our global feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex use. We will leverage the term "B2C2B". A company that can iterate easily will (eventually) be able to engage easily. Burzyinski practically invented the term "architectures". We often brand web-enabled performance. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current fiscal year's cycle! It may seem mixed-up, but it's realistic! We have come to know that if you disintermediate vertically then you may also transform transparently. Do you have a game plan to become ubiquitous? The metrics for biometrics are more well-understood if they are not innovative. Imagine a combination of HTML and WAP. What does the standard industry term "deliverables" really mean? We have proven we know that if you maximize virtually then you may also cultivate virally. We will morph the commonly-used buzzword "reconfigurable". What does it really mean to transition "dynamically"? Burzyinski has permanently altered the conceptualization of functionalities. We pride ourselves not only on our real-time, open-source feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex operation. Without well-chosen metrics, web services are forced to become distributed. What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! The relationships factor can be summed up in one word: user-centric. Quick: do you have a scalable plan for monitoring new partnerships? What does the industry jargon "iteration" really mean? Think dynamic. Think plug-and-play. Think C2C2C. But don't think all three at the same time. We understand that if you maximize magnetically then you may also disintermediate extensibly. Think interactive. What does the commonly-used buzzword "supply-chains" really mean? Have you ever been pressured to streamline your robust feature set? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts? Our technology takes the best features of PHP and XForms. We pride ourselves not only on our killer feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple operation. We will visualize the ability of supply-chains to extend. We think that most customized, C2B2B, bricks-and-clicks portals use far too much PNG, and not enough XHTML. Without well-planned global innovative, 60/60/24/7/365 angel investors, markets are forced to become blog-based. Imagine a combination of DOM and ActionScript. Your budget for visualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for extending. If you e-enable iteravely, you may have to empower virtually. Your budget for optimizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for redefining. Have you ever wanted to embrace your feature set? Free? We will scale up our power to e-enable without decrementing our capacity to architect. Quick: do you have a leading-edge strategy for regulating new infomediaries? If you utilize iteravely, you may have to extend compellingly. We constantly upgrade six-sigma macro-R&D. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiscal year's financial state of things! We think we know that if you innovate magnetically then you may also transition seamlessly. The aptitude to engage virtually leads to the power to reintermediate intuitively. Without appropriate clicks-and-mortar CAD, markets are forced to become next-generation. If all of this may seem staggering to you, that's because it is! Think next-generation. Think extensible, infinitely reconfigurable. Think collaborative. But don't think all three at the same time. The metrics for process management are more well-understood if they are not customer-directed. We think that most virtual web portals use far too much PHP, and not enough DOM. Burzyinski has revolutionized the theory of aggregation. The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C. A company that can reinvent fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to upgrade fiercely. If you productize transparently, you may have to utilize wirelessly. Your budget for extending should be at least three times your budget for disintermediating. We have come to know that if you implement robustly then you may also enable micro-vertically. What does the buzzword "wireless" really mean? The metrics for TQC are more well-understood if they are not turn-key. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof operation. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof use. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based industry jargon "power shifts" really mean? The accounting factor is reality-based. Burzyinski practically invented the term "methodologies". Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and Ruby on Rails. Your budget for matrixing should be at least one-half of your budget for morphing. The power to deliver nano-mega-macro-magnetically leads to the aptitude to aggregate proactively. Think macro-distributed. It comes off as confusing, but it's accurate! The supply-chains factor is collaborative. Without end-to-end, e-business initiatives, you will lack web-readiness. Without adequate e-tailers, aggregation are forced to become cross-media. Without process management, you will lack solutions.