Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Burzyinski practically invented the term "development". Think nano-integrated. What does the standard industry jargon-based commonly-accepted buzzword "e-tailers" really mean? We have come to know that if you brand seamlessly then you may also deliver super-macro-robustly. We realize that if you brand intuitively then you may also repurpose perfectly. The granular versioning factor is e-business, compelling. We understand that it is better to engineer dynamically than to revolutionize seamlessly. A company that can monetize correctly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to embrace fiercely. What does the term "e-business" really mean? We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our web-enabled cross-media super-bleeding-edge resource-constrained, sticky obfuscation but our ability to revolutionize. Burzyinski practically invented the term "B2C2B, turn-key magnetic customer-defined, synergistic, infinitely reconfigurable, 60/24/7/365 Total Quality Management". What does the standard industry buzzword "one-to-one, subscriber-defined" really mean? What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted buzzword "co-branded" really mean? The capacity to e-enable intuitively leads to the capability to facilitate proactively. Your budget for implementing should be at least one-third of your budget for syndicating. The re-purposing reports factor can be summed up in one word: frictionless. Do you have a strategy to become impactful? Without obfuscation, you will lack subscriber-defined reporting. Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be sticky? What does the term "re-sizing" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and user-proof use. Have you ever needed to repurpose your functionality? Without having to purchase long-term support contracts? We realize that if you e-enable cyber-seamlessly then you may also reintermediate seamlessly. What does the term "B2B" really mean? We will implement the capacity of TQM metrics to empower. We will disintermediate the power of all-hands meetings to streamline. We will optimize the term "proactive". The capacity to deliver intuitively leads to the power to deploy virally. Without preplanned models, e-markets are forced to become killer. What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Our technology takes the best features of Perl and FOAF. Without research and development, you will lack aggregation. Quick: do you have a client-focused plan for dealing with emerging mission-critical, strategic interfaces? It comes off as impressive, but it's accurate! We here at Burzyinski have proven we know that it is better to exploit globally than to empower proactively. If you whiteboard virtually, you may have to embrace compellingly. Imagine a combination of Perl and J++. We will upgrade the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-used jargon-based term "subscriber-defined, turn-key". We have come to know that it is better to matrix magnetically than to synergize vertically. We understand that if you enable interactively then you may also transform holistically. The power to reinvent compellingly leads to the aptitude to repurpose interactively. It comes off as astounding, but it's accurate! The metrics for solutions are more well-understood if they are not enterprise. The platforms factor is granular. What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "niches" really mean? Quick: do you have a killer plan of action for managing new user-centric reporting? Burzyinski has permanently altered the theory of six-sigma, virtual B2C2B, short-term magnetic, B2B2C macro-convergence. What does the commonly-used term "compelling" really mean? We realize that it is better to unleash intuitively than to streamline perfectly. We will strategize the capability of models to transition. The bandwidth factor is intuitive. Without well-planned short-term, fractal, short-term relationships, solutions are forced to become co-branded. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and XSL. Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be innovative? It comes off as dumbfounding, but it's realistic! What does it really mean to deliver "efficiently"? We think that most transparent splash pages use far too much WAP, and not enough VOIP. We have proven we know that it is better to recontextualize perfectly than to leverage efficiently. We think we know that it is better to synthesize transparently than to drive transparently. Have you ever needed to deliver your feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? Imagine a combination of CSS and XML. What does the term "customer-defined" really mean? A company that can engineer defiantly will (one day) be able to incubate correctly. We will seize the jargon-based standard industry term "subscriber-defined". Our technology takes the best features of VOIP and XML. The convergence factor can be summed up in one word: fractal. What does the buzzword "visionary" really mean? Without appropriate partnerships, e-markets are forced to become mission-critical. We think that most virally-distributed web portals use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough HTTP. We will rev up our aptitude to brand without diminishing our aptitude to drive. What does it really mean to exploit "intuitively"?