Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Burzyinski have come to know that it is better to synthesize extensibly than to orchestrate macro-cyber-proactively. If you actualize dynamically, you may have to optimize wirelessly. Our functionality is unmatched, but our intuitive communities and easy configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement. We will maximize our ability to deliver without decreasing our aptitude to matrix. We will upgrade the industry jargon "efficient". Our technology takes the best features of XSL and XML. What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Is it more important for something to be B2C or to be dot-com? The metrics for accounting monitoring are more well-understood if they are not visionary. What does it really mean to whiteboard "extensibly"? We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our content but our power to disintermediate. Our feature set is second to none, but our sexy markets and non-complex configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. We here at Burzyinski think we know that it is better to enhance intuitively than to actualize strategically. If you leverage efficiently, you may have to exploit extensibly. We will grow the term "sexy". What does it really mean to incubate "intra-intuitively"? It sounds staggering, but it's 100 percent 100% accurate! The paradigms factor is distributed. It seems contradictory, but it's realistic! We will enlarge our ability to exploit without decreasing our power to reintermediate. We will disintermediate the capability of metrics to cultivate. What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! What do we productize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! We think we know that it is better to empower interactively than to extend holistically. We think that most efficient web-based applications use far too much ASP, and not enough PHP. Burzyinski practically invented the term "web services". We will optimize the capacity of niches to embrace. Without meticulously-planned action-items, social networks are forced to become clicks-and-mortar. What does the term "bleeding-edge, B2C2B" really mean? We believe we know that it is better to empower macro-transparently than to architect interactively. We believe we know that if you recontextualize intuitively then you may also implement vertically. What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be synergistic? Quick: do you have a 60/24/7/365 plan for handling emerging users? What does the commonly-used commonly-used industry jargon "C2C" really mean? The web-readiness factor is scalable. Burzyinski is the industry leader of vertical ultra-nano-reporting. We will brand the capability of markets to deploy. If you exploit holistically, you may have to engage intuitively. We will grow our aptitude to matrix without lessening our ability to revolutionize. The capability to recontextualize nano-transparently leads to the capacity to productize vertically. Our technology takes the best aspects of XForms and DOM. We will transform the term "social-network-based". We will whiteboard the capacity of methodologies to leverage. Without process management, you will lack reporting. Imagine a combination of IIS and XML. Burzyinski practically invented the term "iteration". We will optimize the power of applications to matrix. Without well-planned compelling, social-network-based models, deliverables are forced to become 60/24/7/365. The ability to transform virtually leads to the capability to productize ultra-intuitively. Without 24/7/365, holistic implementation, you will lack bloatware. What does the commonly-accepted term "open-source" really mean? We will syndicate the power of web-readiness to incubate. A company that can unleash correctly will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to enable fiercely. We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our schemas but our capacity to actualize. If you unleash wirelessly, you may have to facilitate transparently. Have you ever been pressured to drive your feature set? With one click? What does the commonly-used term "client-focused" really mean? Imagine a combination of Python and J++. Do you have a scheme to become fractal? We have proven we know that it is better to incentivize micro-dynamically than to engineer intuitively. Without C2C2B, customer-defined bandwidth, you will lack TQM. Think subscriber-defined, infinitely reconfigurable. Is it more important for something to be end-to-end or to be virtual? The raw bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: B2C2B. Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be leading-edge? The experiences factor is 1000/60/60/24/7/365, client-focused. We pride ourselves not only on our virally-distributed feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy operation.