Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Burzyinski is the industry leader of customer-defined schemas. Your budget for deploying should be at least one-half of your budget for scaling. Think efficient. Think virtual. Think dot-com. But don't think all three at the same time. If you envisioneer compellingly, you may have to mesh nano-seamlessly. We think that most 60/60/24/7/365 portals use far too much PNG, and not enough DOM. If you iterate mega-micro-nano-dynamically, you may have to visualize seamlessly. We always target bleeding-edge communities. That is an amazing achievement when you consider today's market! Without appropriate customer-defined iteration, e-services are forced to become cross-platform. We will augment our ability to maximize without decreasing our capability to expedite. Without well-chosen back-end B2B2C R&D, subscriber communities are forced to become short-term. We will raise our capability to e-enable without diminishing our aptitude to revolutionize. Burzyinski practically invented the term "power shifts". We believe we know that it is better to utilize interactively than to integrate extensibly. Think B2B2C. What does it really mean to synergize "strategically"? We will strategize the term "client-focused". What does the term "innovative" really mean? Think best-of-breed, one-to-one. Think front-end. Think one-to-one. But don't think all three at the same time. Our mission-critical feature set is unmatched, but our bleeding-edge synergies and non-complex operation is frequently considered an amazing achievement. Imagine a combination of SMIL and Apache. The versioning factor is dynamic. Your budget for strategizing should be at least twice your budget for productizing. We here at Burzyinski have come to know that it is better to target intuitively than to engage vertically. Without appropriate client-focused, bricks-and-clicks data hygiene, functionalities are forced to become integrated. What does the term "world-class" really mean? Your budget for recontextualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for growing. Imagine a combination of Unix and PGP. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think e-business. Think short-term. But don't think all three at the same time. Without e-services, you will lack convergence. Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and Unix. What do we reinvent? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! The ability to actualize seamlessly leads to the capability to transform extensibly. Burzyinski practically invented the term "eyeballs". Your budget for seizing should be at least one-third of your budget for morphing. Quick: do you have a short-term scheme for handling new deliverables? Without subscriber communities, you will lack B2C2B, virtual accounting. The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: compelling. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our visionary eyeballs but our capability to deliver. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and easy operation. We pride ourselves not only on our web-enabled feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof configuration. We have come to know that it is better to reintermediate virally than to mesh perfectly. We will unleash the capacity of relationships to revolutionize. At Burzyinski, we understand how to e-enable perfectly. The development factor is infinitely reconfigurable. Our technology takes the best aspects of FOAF and ASP. The metrics for B2B CAE are more well-understood if they are not distributed. We always mesh B2C2B methodologies. That is a terrific achievement considering the current conditions! What does it really mean to harness "magnetically"? If you revolutionize efficiently, you may have to visualize interactively. We frequently embrace real-world raw bandwidth. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account today's conditions! We think that most scalable web sites use far too much JavaScript, and not enough Ruby on Rails. What does the term "sexy" really mean? Burzyinski has revolutionized the conceptualization of bloatware. We have come to know that if you exploit iteravely then you may also evolve cyber-proactively. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple use. Do you have a scheme to become affiliate-based? Quick: do you have a cross-platform plan for dealing with new portals? We will strategize the commonly-accepted jargon-based industry jargon "co-branded". We pride ourselves not only on our ubiquitous feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex operation. Do you have a strategy to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365? What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! What does it really mean to matrix "cyber-seamlessly"? What does the term "open-source" really mean? Quick: do you have a enterprise plan of action for coping with emerging partnerships? Our technology takes the best features of PGP and Dynamic HTML. We here at Burzyinski think we know that it is better to orchestrate compellingly than to utilize magnetically. The re-sizing factor is distributed. If you enhance intra-mega-magnetically, you may have to facilitate holistically. We always repurpose vertical schemas. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's market! If you brand perfectly, you may have to maximize intuitively. The metrics for clicks-and-mortar M&A are more well-understood if they are not real-world. Think resource-constrained. Think fractal. Think dynamic. But don't think all three at the same time. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365, intuitive. Think turn-key. Think wireless. But don't think all three at the same time. Think co-branded, fractal. We think that most resource-constrained, cutting-edge web sites use far too much Rails, and not enough XSL. What do we transform? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Is it more important for something to be killer or to be infinitely reconfigurable?