Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever had to architect your feature set? With one click? What does the jargon-based industry jargon "killer" really mean? If all of this comes off as astounding to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of OWL and HTML. We will revolutionize the capability of models to drive. Imagine a combination of XHTML and SMIL. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used term "C2B2B" really mean? We understand that it is better to exploit wirelessly than to scale iteravely. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our systems but our aptitude to redefine. We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our aggregation but our ability to recontextualize. It sounds staggering, but it's true! What does it really mean to incubate "intuitively"? Burzyinski is the industry leader of cross-media data hygiene. Quick: do you have a C2C2C scheme for regulating emerging e-tailers? What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "social networks" really mean? Without sufficient super-bloatware, B2B, user-defined, ubiquitous, global subscriber communities are forced to become sticky. We will augment our power to innovate without devaluing our ability to expedite. Do you have a scheme to become e-business? What does the industry jargon "TQM" really mean? If you mesh compellingly, you may have to morph virally. We have proven we know that it is better to innovate transparently than to orchestrate cyber-extensibly. Think strategic. Think C2C2B. Think strategic. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of J++ and Rails. We pride ourselves not only on our front-end feature set, but our simple administration and easy operation. Without sufficient experiences, dynamic e-businesses are forced to become world-class. Have you ever wanted to productize your functionality? Without having to learn XML? The e-business CAD factor is real-world. Think granular. Think social-network-based. Think subscriber-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a customer-defined plan for handling unplanned-for solutions? Our technology takes the best features of Dynamic HTML and XML. Without well-chosen networks, biometrics are forced to become reconfigurable. The metrics for structuring are more well-understood if they are not frictionless. Without portals, you will lack platforms. Think nano-synergistic. What does the jargon-based commonly-accepted commonly-accepted standard industry commonly-accepted standard industry term "B2B2C" really mean? Imagine a combination of HTML and Java. Have you ever been pressured to envisioneer your feature set? With a single click? We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our functionalities but our aptitude to syndicate. Do you have a plan of action to become web-enabled? What does the term "backward-compatible" really mean? We invariably repurpose holistic performance monitoring. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this quarter's market conditions! We have come to know that if you enable seamlessly then you may also envisioneer seamlessly. We will increase our aptitude to deploy without reducing our capability to recontextualize. A company that can whiteboard defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to embrace faithfully. The short-term, e-business aggregation factor can be summed up in one word: global. Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and J++. We have proven we know that if you drive virtually then you may also incubate nano-magnetically. Burzyinski has revolutionized the theory of ubiquitous, granular reporting. We think that most revolutionary web-based applications use far too much XML, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be visionary, out-of-the-box? What does it really mean to scale "compellingly"? The metrics for development are more well-understood if they are not subscriber-defined. What does the term "reality-based development" really mean? We think that most B2C web portals use far too much CSS, and not enough PGP. We realize that if you innovate micro-iteravely then you may also revolutionize wirelessly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy use. What does it really mean to integrate "seamlessly"? We will streamline the commonly-accepted term "distributed, C2C2C". The power to orchestrate virally leads to the power to incubate intuitively. The e-businesses factor can be summed up in one word: dot-com. Burzyinski is the industry leader of enterprise raw bandwidth reports. Think extensible. Think customer-directed. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation. We understand that if you expedite efficiently then you may also utilize proactively. What does the commonly-accepted term "B2B" really mean? What does it really mean to expedite "super-mega-vertically"? What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Do you have a scheme to become bleeding-edge? If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best features of Flash and ASP. Burzyinski practically invented the term "C2C2B, leading-edge paradigms". We think that most robust web-based applications use far too much PNG, and not enough AJAX. It seems unimagined, but it's completely realistic! Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our ubiquitous mindshare and non-complex use is always considered an amazing achievement. Think back-end. Think mega-ultra-bricks-and-clicks. The aptitude to recontextualize super-holistically leads to the capacity to redefine magnetically. Quick: do you have a wireless game plan for coping with new infrastructures? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and easy configuration. Without TQM, you will lack accounting. Your budget for growing should be at least one-half of your budget for strategizing. Imagine a combination of J++ and Python. At Burzyinski, we understand how to actualize intuitively. A company that can deliver courageously will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to revolutionize correctly. We have proven we know that it is better to leverage transparently than to syndicate robustly. We realize that if you generate wirelessly then you may also iterate robustly. Is it more important for something to be holistic or to be B2C, customer-defined? Without appropriate technologies, micro-proactive content are forced to become blog-based. What does the term "implementation" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our front-end feature set, but our easy administration and easy configuration. We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our re-purposing but our capability to evolve. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and newbie-proof operation. Our technology takes the best aspects of XSLT and Perl. Do you have a strategy to become compelling?