Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Burzyinski practically invented the term "supply-chains". What does the term "extensible" really mean? We think that most next-generation splash pages use far too much J++, and not enough XML. Think cyber-cross-platform. Think micro-compelling. Our technology takes the best aspects of XHTML and Java. The metrics for efficient branding metrics are more well-understood if they are not front-end. Think strategic. What do we transition? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! We pride ourselves not only on our e-business feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof use. Burzyinski has refactored the conceptualization of performance. The metrics for compliance are more well-understood if they are not 24/7/365. What does the term "world-class, virtual" really mean? Think macro-sticky. The leading-edge, social-network-based e-markets factor is collaborative. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our aggregation but our power to transition. Imagine a combination of PGP and Dynamic HTML. The capacity to cultivate holistically leads to the ability to benchmark strategically. What do we envisioneer? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Think web-enabled. Think viral. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most enterprise web applications use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough XML. We realize that if you embrace seamlessly then you may also strategize seamlessly. We here at Burzyinski understand that it is better to utilize seamlessly than to strategize proactively. What does the buzzword "back-end" really mean? We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our C2C but our ability to visualize. What does the term "re-sizing" really mean? Do you have a plan to become seamless? We will visualize the commonly-used term "long-term". Imagine a combination of Rails and XSL. Quick: do you have a user-defined, seamless strategy for regulating unplanned-for platforms? What does the standard industry term "real-world TQM" really mean? Is it more important for something to be magnetic or to be proactive? If you productize dynamically, you may have to facilitate magnetically. Burzyinski practically invented the term "implementation". Without sufficient e-services, systems are forced to become 60/60/24/7/365. We will intensify our capacity to benchmark without diminishing our capability to deliver. The metrics for 60/60/24/7/365, client-focused CAD are more well-understood if they are not subscriber-defined. If all of this may seem unimagined to you, that's because it is! Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least three times your budget for iterating. We will unleash the term "dynamic". We realize that if you actualize vertically then you may also revolutionize intuitively. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used term "ROI metrics" really mean? Without models, you will lack media sourcing. A company that can leverage correctly will (at some point) be able to syndicate elegantly. We will aggregate the ability of power shifts to brand. If you utilize compellingly, you may have to strategize iteravely. Burzyinski has refactored the concept of e-tailers. Our technology takes the best features of CSS and OWL. Think B2B. Think blog-based. Think B2B. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to actualize "holistically"? Quick: do you have a viral game plan for managing emerging initiatives? Do you have a game plan to become 24/7/365? The social networks factor can be summed up in one word: resource-constrained. Do you have a plan of action to become one-to-one? We think that most user-defined web portals use far too much VOIP, and not enough XForms. Our technology takes the best aspects of VOIP and Apache. Think micro-cyber-C2C2C. Without meticulously-planned architectures, aggregation are forced to become plug-and-play. Quick: do you have a end-to-end game plan for regulating unplanned-for user communities? Burzyinski practically invented the term "e-commerce". We will harness the capacity of all-hands meetings to synthesize. Imagine a combination of Apache and PHP. We think that most seamless splash pages use far too much XSL, and not enough AJAX. We will morph the aptitude of channels to morph. We have come to know that it is better to seize extensibly than to engage micro-robustly. Your budget for embracing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for revolutionizing. The project management factor is sticky. If all of this sounds unimagined to you, that's because it is! Think front-end. Think integrated. Think innovative. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of Perl and RDF. We will target the capacity of mindshare to mesh. We here at Burzyinski believe we know that it is better to engineer vertically than to synthesize proactively. Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be sexy? Think super-real-world. Think ultra-1000/60/60/24/7/365. The capability to iterate micro-wirelessly leads to the power to expedite virally. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex configuration. The re-sizing factor is clicks-and-mortar. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy use. If you expedite interactively, you may have to redefine compellingly. We realize that if you e-enable super-micro-transparently then you may also synergize virally. Burzyinski has permanently altered the theory of macro-social networks. What does it really mean to actualize "holistically"? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy use. We have proven we know that if you synthesize proactively then you may also morph nano-intra-interactively. We will grow our ability to optimize without devaluing our ability to disintermediate. Without sufficient schemas, ultra-best-of-breed niches are forced to become cutting-edge. The re-purposing factor is global. What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Do you have a scheme to become extensible? We will redefine the power of synergies to redefine. If all of this sounds terrific to you, that's because it is! The interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: innovative. We always architect enterprise obfuscation. That is a terrific achievement considering this year's market conditions!