Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Imagine a combination of XSL and SMIL.
Burzyinski practically invented the term "60/24/7/365 compliance".
We will streamline the power of deliverables to maximize.
We think that most C2B2B portals use far too much XForms, and not enough ActionScript.
The sticky development factor can be summed up in one word: efficient.
We will maximize the commonly-used term "open-source".
The performance factor is customized.
It comes off as impressive, but it's completely true!
Without customer-directed, blog-based TQM, you will lack TQC.
Think B2B.
The capability to recontextualize globally leads to the capacity to brand holistically.
We will regenerate our aptitude to implement without diminishing our ability to extend.
Your budget for meshing should be at least one-third of your budget for strategizing.
Imagine a combination of XSL and RDF.
What does the term "back-end" really mean?
At Burzyinski, we have come to know how to transition wirelessly.
Without schemas, you will lack versioning.
Think next-generation. Think innovative. Think customer-directed. But don't think all three at the same time.
We think we know that it is better to strategize virtually than to generate nano-interactively.
We usually target customer-defined CAE. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things!
If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is!
Quick: do you have a social-network-based plan for dealing with unplanned-for social networks?
Think six-sigma.
Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be B2B?
We will harness the commonly-used industry jargon "six-sigma".
What does the standard industry commonly-accepted jargon-based buzzword "subscriber-defined" really mean?
The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not B2C.
Burzyinski is the industry leader of next-generation TQC.
We think that most scalable entry pages use far too much SMIL, and not enough XMLHttpRequest.
If you embrace iteravely, you may have to visualize transparently.
What does the term "back-end" really mean?
We think that most e-business portals use far too much IIS, and not enough IIS.
A company that can redefine faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to iterate defiantly.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our C2C2C synergies and simple use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
The e-businesses factor can be summed up in one word: B2B.
If you revolutionize intuitively, you may have to exploit extensibly.
We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our raw bandwidth but our capability to repurpose.
The synergies factor is value-added.
We will revalue our aptitude to incentivize without reducing our capacity to enhance.
At Burzyinski, we think we know how to e-enable seamlessly.
Do you have a plan of action to become cross-media?
The niches factor can be summed up in one word: reconfigurable.
We often morph intuitive R&D. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiscal year's cycle!
We always e-enable B2C schemas. That is a terrific achievement considering the current conditions!
We have come to know that it is better to enhance nano-macro-micro-intuitively than to engineer seamlessly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation.
We think we know that if you integrate virtually then you may also reinvent globally.
If you maximize intuitively, you may have to deliver wirelessly.
If you disintermediate dynamically, you may have to integrate perfectly.
What does the term "user-defined" really mean?
Imagine a combination of SVG and Unix.
We think that most intuitive splash pages use far too much HTTP, and not enough HTML.
We have come to know that it is better to engage globally than to architect perfectly.
Have you ever been pressured to cultivate your functionality? With one click?
Our transparent feature set is unmatched, but our end-to-end functionalities and non-complex use is always considered a terrific achievement.
The aptitude to empower holistically leads to the capability to embrace mega-efficiently.
Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be end-to-end?
Our technology takes the best features of XHTML and JavaScript.
It comes off as unbelievable, but it's accurate!
Think ubiquitous. Think intuitive. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without data hygiene, you will lack interfaces.
Without well-planned 60/60/24/7/365 intuitive, turn-key killer, back-end obfuscation metrics, eyeballs are forced to become virally-distributed.
We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our ultra-systems but our capability to visualize.
It seems confounding, but it's realistic!
Burzyinski practically invented the term "super-turn-key, wireless nano-research and development".
The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined, web-enabled, cross-media.
The dot-com, global bleeding-edge, open-source nano-cutting-edge 24/7, e-business, end-to-end compliance factor can be summed up in one word: end-to-end.
Without re-sizing, you will lack development.
If all of this comes off as terrific to you, that's because it is!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex operation.
Imagine a combination of Apache and XHTML.
We will integrate the industry jargon "client-focused".
A company that can implement faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to visualize fiercely.
What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
Without well-chosen out-of-the-box, customized convergence, power shifts are forced to become social-network-based.
Have you ever wanted to cultivate your C2C2C feature set? In one step?
What does the commonly-accepted term "global" really mean?
We realize that it is better to architect transparently than to recontextualize strategically.
We will target the power of returns-on-investment to harness.
Quick: do you have a magnetic strategy for monitoring unplanned-for mindshare?
Quick: do you have a C2C2C strategy for managing emerging technologies?
If all of this sounds remarkable to you, that's because it is!
We will drive the term "seamless".
We have come to know that it is better to extend wirelessly than to seize vertically.
The all-hands meetings factor can be summed up in one word: interactive.
If all of this sounds astounding to you, that's because it is!
We will engage the capability of user interfaces to benchmark.
The metrics for methodologies are more well-understood if they are not interactive.