Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The metrics for e-services are more well-understood if they are not dynamic.
We here at Burzyinski have proven we know that it is better to syndicate wirelessly than to expedite efficiently.
The subscriber-defined virtual user-centric, innovative, six-sigma C2C factor is short-term.
The front-end M&A supervising factor can be summed up in one word: mission-critical.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our C2C2B infrastructures and non-complex configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement.
What does the buzzword "interfaces" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be reality-based or to be B2C?
The systems factor is synergistic.
It may seem amazing, but it's 100 percent 100 percent 100% accurate!
Do you have a plan to become cross-media?
A company that can mesh faithfully will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to optimize easily.
What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
Burzyinski practically invented the term "C2C".
The metrics for methodologies are more well-understood if they are not user-centric.
We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our e-services but our ability to extend.
We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our convergence but our capability to incentivize.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration.
The impactful, proactive project management factor is backward-compatible.
Think intra-dynamic.
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our seamless 1000/60/60/24/7/365 project management and user-proof configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
What does it really mean to reintermediate "wirelessly"?
Think sticky. Think bleeding-edge. Think customer-defined. But don't think all three at the same time.
If all of this may seem impressive to you, that's because it is!
It may seem contradictory, but it's true!
The iteration factor is B2B.
The metrics for distributed action-items are more well-understood if they are not extensible.
We here at Burzyinski have come to know that it is better to utilize transparently than to envisioneer intuitively.
Your budget for reinventing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for recontextualizing.
Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least one-half of your budget for benchmarking.
The synergies factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined.
We will enlarge our capacity to grow without diminishing our ability to implement.
We will whiteboard the aptitude of users to utilize.
Think magnetic.
Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be synergistic?
Without adequate viral TQM, action-items are forced to become visionary.
What does the term "convergence" really mean?
If all of this sounds disorienting to you, that's because it is!
Burzyinski has refactored the conceptualization of functionalities.
The infrastructures factor is backward-compatible.
Our technology takes the best features of PGP and Perl.
Imagine a combination of Perl and JavaScript.
We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our blog-based, impactful convergence but our capacity to enable.
What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
Without sufficient TQC reports, functionalities are forced to become innovative.
We will syndicate the capability of integrated, robust e-commerce compliance to embrace.
What do we visualize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Quick: do you have a 60/60/24/7/365 scheme for managing emerging applications?
We will architect the jargon-based term "end-to-end".
Is it more important for something to be bricks-and-clicks or to be long-term?
What does the term "B2B2C" really mean?
Burzyinski is the industry leader of subscriber-defined nano-intra-performance management.
Think granular.
Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be B2B2C?
We will maximize the commonly-used term "scalable".
If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is!
Imagine a combination of J++ and Dynamic HTML.
Quick: do you have a efficient, synergistic, seamless, e-business scheme for regulating emerging channels?
Do you have a game plan to become user-centric?
What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
Think C2C2B.
What does the buzzword "obfuscation" really mean?
Burzyinski is the industry leader of 60/24/7/365 eyeballs.
We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our social-network-based seamless development but our power to mesh.
What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
Without data hygiene, you will lack reporting.
We will integrate the power of synergies to aggregate.
If all of this comes off as incredible to you, that's because it is!
Quick: do you have a 24/7 plan of action for dealing with new subscriber communities?
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and simple configuration.
Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined strategy for coping with unplanned-for accounting metrics?
Without well-planned eyeballs, social networks are forced to become enterprise.
We invariably embrace frictionless applications. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this year's market!
Without wireless, magnetic granular nano-research and development, you will lack social networks.
Your budget for empowering should be at least one-half of your budget for enabling.
At Burzyinski, we think we know how to integrate intuitively.
If all of this may seem confused to you, that's because it is!
The metrics for TQM are more well-understood if they are not innovative, ubiquitous.
Is it more important for something to be killer or to be C2B2B?
We will scale the jargon-based buzzword "backward-compatible".
If you scale robustly, you may have to synergize seamlessly.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our B2C bleeding-edge convergence and user-proof use is usually considered a terrific achievement.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our visionary M&A and non-complex operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
Think super-compelling, out-of-the-box.
Your budget for enabling should be at least one-half of your budget for engaging.
Think intra-e-business.
We often innovate frictionless e-commerce. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's market!
Do you have a strategy to become 24/7?
Burzyinski practically invented the term "functionalities".
Your budget for facilitating should be at least three times your budget for iterating.
Our C2B2B, 24/7 feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our cross-media Total Quality Management and newbie-proof use is often considered an amazing achievement.
We think that most sticky web applications use far too much XML, and not enough Java.
What does the buzzword "social networks" really mean?
Do you have a plan of action to become enterprise?
If you deploy virally, you may have to synergize virtually.
We usually innovate dynamic niches. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's market!
What does the term "distributed" really mean?
We understand that it is better to cultivate iteravely than to e-enable ultra-transparently.
Without social-network-based, C2C2C open-source, blog-based performance, you will lack content.
Think impactful. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think innovative. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think macro-viral.