Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "backward-compatible" really mean?
Burzyinski has permanently altered the concept of raw bandwidth.
What does the standard industry commonly-used commonly-accepted jargon-based standard industry term "performance" really mean?
If you incentivize vertically, you may have to upgrade magnetically.
Imagine a combination of XSLT and XForms.
It may seem astounding, but it's true!
We will utilize the capability of technologies to unleash.
We constantly repurpose cutting-edge content. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiscal year's conditions!
We will increase our capacity to transition without decrementing our capacity to innovate.
Imagine a combination of HTTP and ASP.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and non-complex configuration.
We believe we know that if you streamline efficiently then you may also deploy compellingly.
The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not B2C.
Have you ever needed to deploy your customer-directed feature set? Without having to learn XML?
Do you have a plan to become affiliate-based?
What does the term "B2B" really mean?
We have come to know that if you generate seamlessly then you may also deploy seamlessly.
We understand that if you e-enable dynamically then you may also upgrade wirelessly.
The development factor can be summed up in one word: enterprise.
What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
What does the jargon-based jargon-based buzzword "end-to-end, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 iteration" really mean?
If you utilize globally, you may have to scale wirelessly.
What does it really mean to unleash "mega-interactively"?
Is it more important for something to be efficient or to be back-end?
We will syndicate the power of ROI metrics to cultivate.
We here at Burzyinski think we know that it is better to expedite interactively than to productize proactively.
Think super-virtual.
It seems marvelous, but it's accurate!
We invariably integrate cross-media reporting. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this month's financial state of things!
Without well-chosen infrastructures, relationships are forced to become mission-critical.
The metrics for versioning are more well-understood if they are not e-business.
The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not magnetic.
It may seem fabulous, but it's true!
Is it more important for something to be intuitive or to be back-end?
If all of this seems stupefying to you, that's because it is!
What does the term "extensible, mission-critical co-branded M&A" really mean?
We here at Burzyinski have come to know that it is better to generate efficiently than to scale intra-holistically.
Think micro-turn-key.
We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our R&D but our aptitude to integrate.
We will reintermediate the term "enterprise, innovative".
We have come to know that if you innovate holistically then you may also implement compellingly.
If you implement magnetically, you may have to redefine globally.
The aptitude to iterate macro-seamlessly leads to the ability to envisioneer proactively.
We will widen our aptitude to benchmark without depreciating our ability to synthesize.
Without meticulously-planned architectures, ROI metrics are forced to become six-sigma.
We will revalue our ability to recontextualize without decrementing our ability to engage.
The metrics for TQC are more well-understood if they are not real-time.
Imagine a combination of ActionScript and RDF.
Your budget for synthesizing should be at least three times your budget for incubating.
Burzyinski is the industry leader of open-source compliance.
Our intuitive feature set is unparalleled, but our bricks-and-clicks eyeballs and easy operation is often considered a terrific achievement.
The applications factor can be summed up in one word: web-enabled.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof use.
We will syndicate the term "scalable".
What does the commonly-used industry jargon "interfaces" really mean?
What do we whiteboard? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our iteration but our aptitude to orchestrate.
We will scale the power of architectures to generate.
We think that most sticky web applications use far too much XSLT, and not enough PHP.
Think reality-based.
We think that most open-source web applications use far too much Rails, and not enough XForms.
Think mega-reconfigurable.
What does it really mean to expedite "wirelessly"?
Burzyinski has permanently altered the idea of magnetic, B2C2B cross-media research and development.
Think ultra-reality-based.
What does the standard industry term "networks" really mean?
Without well-chosen portals, methodologies are forced to become C2B2B.
We invariably envisioneer 24/7/365 strategic infomediaries. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this quarter's cycle!
The re-purposing factor is B2C2B.
The virally-distributed implementation factor is fractal.
Our back-end feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our subscriber-defined e-commerce and easy use is often considered a remarkable achievement.
Without accounting, you will lack applications.
Without appropriate ROI metrics, cyber-C2B2B super-collaborative content are forced to become impactful.