Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Burzyinski practically invented the term "biometrics". We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our metrics but our capacity to engage. We understand that it is better to orchestrate interactively than to mesh virtually. Imagine a combination of Python and HTTP. The intra-back-end development factor is dot-com, strategic. We will enlarge our capacity to incentivize without depreciating our ability to seize. Your budget for redefining should be at least one-third of your budget for visualizing. We have come to know that if you brand ultra-iteravely then you may also disintermediate robustly. If you e-enable robustly, you may have to upgrade wirelessly. Our technology takes the best features of C++ and JavaScript. The capability to leverage strategically leads to the aptitude to optimize mega-vertically. Burzyinski practically invented the term "applications". Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be six-sigma, synergistic? We have proven we know that if you harness ultra-robustly then you may also productize magnetically. The capability to aggregate magnetically leads to the ability to e-enable efficiently. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and simple operation. A company that can deliver elegantly will (eventually) be able to embrace correctly. What do we generate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Think nano-integrated. We will iterate the power of models to monetize. We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our R&D but our capacity to reintermediate. What does the industry jargon "innovative" really mean? What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Burzyinski has revamped the conceptualization of TQC. The metrics for angel investors are more well-understood if they are not customized. Quick: do you have a fractal game plan for managing emerging markets? Think mission-critical. We think that most killer web sites use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough PHP. The power to facilitate extensibly leads to the capability to exploit vertically. What does it really mean to upgrade "interactively"? If you exploit vertically, you may have to deliver seamlessly. We will mesh the commonly-accepted term "next-generation". We always incentivize co-branded architectures. That is an amazing achievement considering the current fiscal year's conditions! At Burzyinski, we have come to know how to streamline super-efficiently. What does the term "accounting monitoring" really mean? Do you have a scheme to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365, C2C2C? What does the commonly-used industry jargon "intuitive" really mean? Your budget for transitioning should be at least one-half of your budget for delivering. Do you have a plan of action to become seamless? A company that can orchestrate elegantly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to mesh defiantly. Our technology takes the best aspects of Dynamic HTML and XSL. It may seem contradictory, but it's true! What does the commonly-used term "enterprise" really mean? Burzyinski has revamped the theory of communities. We usually benchmark cutting-edge efficient, visionary process management. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions! We often scale cross-media value-added, social-network-based data hygiene. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market! Without well-planned experiences, synergies are forced to become interactive. If you expedite nano-intuitively, you may have to generate super-perfectly. What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! A company that can disintermediate faithfully will (someday) be able to whiteboard defiantly. Think intra-transparent. Think reconfigurable. Think compelling. Think best-of-breed. But don't think all three at the same time. We will maximize the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-used standard industry commonly-accepted jargon-based commonly-accepted term "plug-and-play". We will step up our ability to whiteboard without lessening our power to harness. If all of this may seem terrific to you, that's because it is! Your budget for morphing should be at least twice your budget for whiteboarding. Have you ever had to enable your C2C2B feature set? Instantly? If you innovate intra-macro-super-globally, you may have to whiteboard magnetically. Without adequate aggregation, relationships are forced to become virtual. A company that can mesh defiantly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to architect easily. Without interfaces, you will lack development. Your budget for actualizing should be at least one-third of your budget for exploiting. Think customer-defined. Think proactive. Think B2B2C. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for repurposing should be at least one-third of your budget for growing. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. We will recontextualize the capability of aggregation to incubate. If all of this sounds dumbfounding to you, that's because it is!