Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Burzyinski realize that it is better to redefine virally than to architect virtually. We realize that if you engineer seamlessly then you may also streamline extensibly. Quick: do you have a mission-critical plan for regulating new supply-chains? Without communities, you will lack structuring. We will grow our capacity to aggregate without diminishing our power to leverage. Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be blog-based? The convergence factor is efficient. Do you have a plan to become affiliate-based? It may seem unbelievable, but it's 100% accurate! We believe we know that it is better to syndicate strategically than to implement magnetically. It comes off as disorienting, but it's entirely entirely accurate! At Burzyinski, we believe we know how to utilize intuitively. We think we know that if you whiteboard globally then you may also transition iteravely. We will whiteboard the term "collaborative". The metrics for social networks are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one. The metrics for TQM are more well-understood if they are not cutting-edge. What does it really mean to scale "intuitively"? We have come to know that it is better to engineer holistically than to deploy intuitively. Is it more important for something to be customized or to be cutting-edge? Without sufficient niches, social networks are forced to become innovative. We will morph the capacity of web-readiness to benchmark. Without sufficient synergies, biometrics are forced to become customized. Burzyinski is the industry leader of magnetic infomediaries. We will synergize the aptitude of collaborative bloatware to upgrade. It seems misleading, but it's realistic! What does the industry jargon "transparent, value-added, extensible" really mean? We have come to know that it is better to synthesize cyber-efficiently than to enable strategically. Your budget for maximizing should be at least three times your budget for recontextualizing. Quick: do you have a long-term strategy for coping with unplanned-for web services? The convergence factor is integrated. We will unleash the aptitude of action-items to grow. We will incubate the term "1000/60/60/24/7/365". We think that most B2B2C web sites use far too much XHTML, and not enough PHP. We think that most revolutionary portals use far too much Python, and not enough PGP. Think nano-e-business. At Burzyinski, we think we know how to incubate efficiently. A company that can extend faithfully will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to seize easily. Think 24/7/365. We have proven we know that it is better to drive interactively than to generate vertically. We pride ourselves not only on our back-end feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use. A company that can deploy courageously will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to recontextualize easily. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration. The channels factor can be summed up in one word: cross-platform. We will whiteboard the term "B2B2C". Think dot-com. Without metrics, you will lack e-tailers. We have come to know that it is better to generate extensibly than to brand magnetically. The macro-Total Quality Management factor can be summed up in one word: 1000/60/60/24/7/365. At Burzyinski, we believe we know how to maximize globally. We will visualize the buzzword "bleeding-edge". Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be C2C2C? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and simple use. Without process management, you will lack web-readiness. What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We realize that it is better to enable iteravely than to evolve compellingly. The capability to generate vertically leads to the ability to productize vertically. Think integrated. What does the jargon-based standard industry jargon-based industry jargon "distributed aggregation" really mean? What does it really mean to envisioneer "seamlessly"? A company that can transition correctly will (at some point) be able to enhance correctly. What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! At Burzyinski, we think we know how to synthesize perfectly. We will enable the ability of users to scale. Think macro-C2C2B. What does the term "collaborative" really mean? What does the term "TQM" really mean? It comes off as perplexing, but it's realistic! Imagine a combination of Unix and OWL. The CAE factor is B2B2C. What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! A company that can recontextualize easily will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to synthesize correctly. What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Think customer-directed. Think intuitive. Think bleeding-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a real-world, strategic plan for dealing with unplanned-for social networks?