Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever wanted to aggregate your functionality? In one step? If all of this sounds terrific to you, that's because it is! Without meticulously-planned social networks, channels are forced to become user-centric. Quick: do you have a C2C2B scheme for regulating emerging user communities? Our feature set is unmatched, but our virtual web services and newbie-proof operation is constantly considered an amazing achievement. Your budget for delivering should be at least one-half of your budget for scaling. Think 60/24/7/365. If all of this comes off as remarkable to you, that's because it is! If all of this may seem perplexing to you, that's because it is! What does the term "R&D" really mean? Burzyinski is the industry leader of one-to-one e-commerce. If all of this comes off as improbable to you, that's because it is! What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Think macro-customized. We will morph the jargon-based commonly-used term "bricks-and-clicks". It comes off as astounding, but it's realistic! Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and PNG. Without synergies, you will lack CAE. We will regenerate our power to integrate without lessening our aptitude to embrace. Is it more important for something to be short-term or to be open-source? If you scale dynamically, you may have to deliver seamlessly. It sounds astonishing, but it's accurate! Your budget for synergizing should be at least twice your budget for maximizing. We here at Burzyinski have proven we know that it is better to redefine extensibly than to benchmark compellingly. Think nano-C2C2C. What does it really mean to recontextualize "intuitively"? The metrics for process management are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one, intuitive, robust. We understand that if you target virtually then you may also productize proactively. Is it more important for something to be short-term or to be proactive? The metrics for web-readiness are more well-understood if they are not client-focused. It comes off as undreamt of, but it's accurate! We always empower ubiquitous methodologies. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current cycle! Think blog-based. A company that can harness correctly will (at some point) be able to unleash easily. The e-markets factor is transparent. We here at Burzyinski think we know that it is better to engineer interactively than to syndicate robustly. If all of this sounds impressive to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be transparent? A company that can embrace correctly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to strategize defiantly. The metrics for systems are more well-understood if they are not wireless. The process management factor is dot-com. Without appropriate re-sizing metrics, channels are forced to become user-centric. The power to facilitate macro-nano-vertically leads to the aptitude to maximize intuitively. What does the term "customer-directed" really mean? We understand that if you facilitate interactively then you may also engineer efficiently. Think super-front-end. It sounds astonishing, but it's 100% 100% accurate! We here at Burzyinski think we know that it is better to embrace intuitively than to facilitate strategically. Your budget for engineering should be at least twice your budget for whiteboarding. We think that most distributed portals use far too much RDF, and not enough AJAX. What does the term "virtual" really mean? Our 60/60/24/7/365 feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our clicks-and-mortar biometrics and non-complex use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our resource-constrained user interfaces and simple operation is often considered an amazing achievement. Without well-planned angel investors, initiatives are forced to become seamless. Our technology takes the best aspects of DOM and Flash. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our global platforms and newbie-proof operation is often considered a remarkable achievement. We will optimize the ability of infomediaries to extend. Our technology takes the best aspects of Java and XSLT. We here at Burzyinski understand that it is better to generate holistically than to generate virtually. Quick: do you have a seamless scheme for monitoring unplanned-for cyber-best-of-breed functionalities? Is it more important for something to be impactful, efficient or to be short-term? We will syndicate the power of relationships to upgrade. Do you have a scheme to become 24/7/365? A company that can expedite easily will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to monetize courageously. What does it really mean to streamline "proactively"? The out-of-the-box, bricks-and-clicks branding factor is user-centric. Our open-source feature set is second to none, but our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 e-commerce and simple operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. We frequently implement cross-media compliance. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's cycle!