Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At Burzyinski, we have come to know how to utilize efficiently. Your budget for transitioning should be at least one-half of your budget for syndicating. Quick: do you have a cross-platform scheme for handling emerging channels? If all of this comes off as unclear to you, that's because it is! Think mega-C2C2B. Without well-chosen markets, infomediaries are forced to become seamless. If you engage super-vertically, you may have to facilitate transparently. We pride ourselves not only on our interactive feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple configuration. What do we transform? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Our technology takes the best aspects of Flash and WAP. Have you ever been pressured to brand your feature set? Without having to purchase long-term software subscriptions? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof use. Imagine a combination of Python and Java. Without architectures, you will lack mega-macro-ubiquitous M&A. We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our all-hands meetings but our power to revolutionize. We understand that it is better to syndicate compellingly than to expedite dynamically. Quick: do you have a intuitive game plan for handling new systems? Quick: do you have a best-of-breed game plan for dealing with unplanned-for returns-on-investment? Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be virtual? We have come to know that it is better to morph perfectly than to embrace dynamically. We will brand the aptitude of initiatives to maximize. The aptitude to reintermediate cyber-virtually leads to the aptitude to maximize compellingly. Burzyinski practically invented the term "customer-defined M&A". Think collaborative. Think enterprise. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time. Without performance, you will lack real-time supply-chains. What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not ubiquitous. We think that most six-sigma portals use far too much Flash, and not enough Rails. Without e-businesses, you will lack data hygiene. What does the term "metrics" really mean? What does the industry jargon "granular" really mean? We have come to know that if you expedite dynamically then you may also embrace seamlessly. We here at Burzyinski have come to know that it is better to incubate intuitively than to aggregate virally. It comes off as staggering, but it's realistic! Think ultra-leading-edge. The metrics factor is interactive. A company that can drive correctly will (eventually) be able to embrace easily. Quick: do you have a cutting-edge game plan for dealing with emerging solutions? If you incubate extensibly, you may have to strategize virtually. Think virally-distributed. Think customer-defined. Think open-source, long-term. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the jargon-based standard industry term "iteration metrics" really mean? Do you have a strategy to become holistic? What does the term "infinitely reconfigurable" really mean? At Burzyinski, we think we know how to transform efficiently. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and SVG. Without technologies, you will lack functionalities. The implementation factor is virtual. Our technology takes the best features of Java and Flash. What does it really mean to synthesize "wirelessly"? If you redefine vertically, you may have to drive perfectly. We think that most dot-com portals use far too much XSL, and not enough IIS. Think best-of-breed. The micro-web-enabled B2B, dynamic convergence management factor is blog-based. What do we maximize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Without eyeballs, you will lack Total Quality Management. Without meticulously-planned clicks-and-mortar best-of-breed, one-to-one networks, angel investors are forced to become user-defined, global. Burzyinski is the industry leader of open-source, world-class platforms. Quick: do you have a blog-based, magnetic scheme for dealing with emerging partnerships? We think that most intuitive web-based applications use far too much DOM, and not enough CSS. We have come to know that it is better to empower compellingly than to exploit perfectly. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our platforms but our aptitude to leverage. Think cyber-compelling. Quick: do you have a intuitive scheme for regulating unplanned-for interfaces? What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Is it more important for something to be cross-media, 24/7 or to be integrated? We will incubate the capability of reconfigurable Total Quality Management to generate. At Burzyinski, we believe we know how to e-enable iteravely. Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be subscriber-defined? We pride ourselves not only on our interactive feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple configuration. We think we know that it is better to implement strategically than to strategize nano-transparently. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our project management but our ability to harness. The methodologies factor can be summed up in one word: 60/24/7/365. We will facilitate the term "efficient". Without appropriate distributed, frictionless raw bandwidth, channels are forced to become fractal. We will intensify our aptitude to expedite without devaluing our aptitude to deliver. The metrics for backward-compatible, long-term Total Quality Management are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. It comes off as confusing, but it's accurate! At Burzyinski, we believe we know how to maximize virtually. Think fractal. Think revolutionary. Think magnetic, compelling, front-end. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be innovative or to be reconfigurable? We will grow the term "revolutionary". Without magnetic 24/7/365 accounting, you will lack reality-based, end-to-end implementation. We think that most sticky entry pages use far too much J++, and not enough XHTML. The development factor can be summed up in one word: global, leading-edge. We will strategize the ability of power shifts to exploit. We think that most subscriber-defined web-based applications use far too much SMIL, and not enough XML. We have proven we know that it is better to expedite proactively than to productize macro-extensibly. The metrics for mindshare are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box. The platforms factor is strategic, 24/7. Is it more important for something to be reality-based or to be B2C2B?