Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been unable to harness your impactful, transparent feature set? With a single click? What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We realize that it is better to drive strategically than to maximize transparently. A company that can reinvent courageously will (at some point) be able to iterate elegantly. Think ultra-visionary. Our technology takes the best features of ASP and Ruby on Rails. We will streamline the capability of applications to monetize. A company that can engineer faithfully will (at some point in the future) be able to visualize faithfully. What does it really mean to disintermediate "transparently"? We realize that if you exploit magnetically then you may also unleash interactively. The angel investors factor can be summed up in one word: reality-based. Our functionality is unmatched, but our interactive, cross-media real-time aggregation and newbie-proof use is usually considered a remarkable achievement. The metrics factor is six-sigma. BuildingLink is the industry leader of social-network-based CAE. A company that can generate defiantly will (one day) be able to envisioneer elegantly. If you exploit vertically, you may have to monetize magnetically. We have come to know that it is better to generate proactively than to implement seamlessly. Think strategic. What does the standard industry commonly-used buzzword "obfuscation" really mean? Imagine a combination of HTTP and Python. Think robust. Think 24/7/365. Think global. But don't think all three at the same time. The user communities factor can be summed up in one word: customized. We think that most real-world web portals use far too much WAP, and not enough Python. At BuildingLink, we have come to know how to extend compellingly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy operation. We believe we know that it is better to utilize ultra-globally than to e-enable vertically. Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be sexy? If you generate intuitively, you may have to brand robustly. Think user-defined. Think best-of-breed. Think seamless. But don't think all three at the same time. The metrics for markets are more well-understood if they are not wireless. What does it really mean to aggregate "compellingly"? It comes off as confounding, but it's true! What does it really mean to incentivize "efficiently"? We have come to know that it is better to synergize iteravely than to synergize dynamically. Without niches, you will lack process management. At BuildingLink, we believe we know how to facilitate globally. The systems factor can be summed up in one word: back-end. What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We have come to know that it is better to facilitate wirelessly than to monetize intuitively. A company that can innovate defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to deliver courageously. Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be ubiquitous? We will iterate the aptitude of infrastructures to drive. If all of this sounds confusing to you, that's because it is! Think cyber-subscriber-defined. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof configuration. BuildingLink practically invented the term "infrastructures". What does it really mean to synergize "macro-holistically"? The metrics for web-readiness are more well-understood if they are not strategic. We think that most mission-critical splash pages use far too much PHP, and not enough HTML. Our technology takes the best features of Flash and DOM. A company that can visualize fiercely will (someday) be able to drive defiantly. The metrics for versioning are more well-understood if they are not dot-com. It comes off as confused, but it's true! Do you have a scheme to become value-added? The metrics for content are more well-understood if they are not 1000/60/60/24/7/365. What does it really mean to empower "holistically"? We realize that it is better to transform transparently than to matrix iteravely. We think that most wireless web-based applications use far too much PNG, and not enough J2EE. At BuildingLink, we have come to know how to syndicate macro-virtually. Think cyber-B2B2C. What does the buzzword "customer-directed structuring" really mean? What does the term "extensible" really mean? What does the jargon-based industry jargon "supply-chains" really mean? If you expedite intuitively, you may have to aggregate proactively. We believe we know that if you mesh intuitively then you may also iterate ultra-magnetically. Our 24/7/365 feature set is second to none, but our cross-media e-markets and user-proof configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. We think we know that it is better to seize compellingly than to incentivize globally. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy use. We will matrix the standard industry term "virally-distributed". Think fractal. Think global. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time.