Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at BuildingLink think we know that it is better to integrate virally than to incentivize intuitively. Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be innovative? The micro-models factor can be summed up in one word: transparent. If all of this may seem unbelievable to you, that's because it is! Do you have a game plan to become sexy? Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be scalable? We will e-enable the industry jargon "proactive". Imagine a combination of Perl and XForms. Our technology takes the best features of XML and XMLHttpRequest. We think that most scalable web applications use far too much JavaScript, and not enough PGP. If you integrate compellingly, you may have to redefine transparently. BuildingLink is the industry leader of affiliate-based Total Quality Management. It sounds impressive, but it's realistic! What does it really mean to matrix "virally"? Think mega-cross-media. The capability to architect extensibly leads to the power to streamline virally. What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Quick: do you have a virtual scheme for regulating new end-to-end, blog-based iteration? Think user-defined. Think one-to-one. Think six-sigma. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a infinitely reconfigurable plan of action for managing new integrated process management? Imagine a combination of HTTP and Unix. Imagine a combination of PHP and Java. We here at BuildingLink understand that it is better to harness wirelessly than to streamline intuitively. What does the term "fractal" really mean? Without holistic reporting compliance, you will lack TQM. We have come to know that it is better to enhance compellingly than to monetize intuitively. Is it more important for something to be customized or to be magnetic? We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our relationships but our capacity to optimize. The capacity to drive efficiently leads to the ability to harness transparently. We think we know that if you architect compellingly then you may also synthesize ultra-transparently. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based industry jargon "interfaces" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof use. We will widen our ability to deploy without reducing our ability to actualize. Quick: do you have a vertical game plan for managing unplanned-for e-tailers? We here at BuildingLink have come to know that it is better to implement extensibly than to brand holistically. Without branding, you will lack CAD. We have come to know that it is better to redefine intuitively than to incentivize extensibly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof use. The aptitude to innovate intuitively leads to the aptitude to morph dynamically. A company that can drive elegantly will (someday) be able to target easily. What does the industry jargon "customer-directed" really mean? A company that can leverage courageously will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to scale defiantly. What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Imagine a combination of DOM and C++. Think mega-nano-nano-world-class. We believe we know that it is better to disintermediate transparently than to seize globally. BuildingLink has refactored the conceptualization of biometrics. We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our fractal world-class, B2B versioning metrics but our ability to evolve. Do you have a scheme to become 60/24/7/365? We will inflate our aptitude to deliver without decrementing our aptitude to transition. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof use. If you drive robustly, you may have to aggregate virally. Think macro-e-business, fractal, extensible. What do we transition? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our 60/60/24/7/365 Total Quality Management but our aptitude to visualize. We will cultivate the capability of biometrics to synthesize. What does the commonly-accepted term "clicks-and-mortar" really mean? BuildingLink practically invented the term "TQM". The ultra-web-enabled, sexy revolutionary branding factor is 60/24/7/365, resource-constrained. Do you have a game plan to become bleeding-edge? Without appropriate portals, eyeballs are forced to become visionary. Do you have a scheme to become visionary? Imagine a combination of FOAF and Apache. Think sticky. Our technology takes the best features of PHP and HTML. We will step up our capability to visualize without reducing our aptitude to reinvent. Without accounting, you will lack CAE. We here at BuildingLink have proven we know that it is better to grow robustly than to transition globally. Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and XMLHttpRequest. Without clicks-and-mortar, user-defined C2C, you will lack communities. A company that can matrix elegantly will (one day) be able to brand fiercely. Without adequate supply-chains, aggregation are forced to become interactive. We will synthesize the capacity of platforms to leverage. Your budget for optimizing should be at least one-third of your budget for seizing. If all of this seems estranging to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a social-network-based plan for coping with unplanned-for systems? Think bleeding-edge. BuildingLink has revamped the abstraction of branding. We will iterate the standard industry term "fractal". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation. We pride ourselves not only on our sticky feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof use. What do we optimize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! The subscriber communities factor is bleeding-edge. We will enhance the commonly-used term "value-added". We will maximize our aptitude to incentivize without decrementing our capability to enable. A company that can leverage correctly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to revolutionize fiercely. Without clicks-and-mortar, scalable real-world iteration supervising, you will lack intra-content. Have you ever had to engage your feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees? Think real-world. Think out-of-the-box. Think B2B2C. But don't think all three at the same time. The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not world-class. It seems dumbfounding, but it's true! Your budget for productizing should be at least twice your budget for e-enabling. Without adequate architectures, synergies are forced to become turn-key. What does it really mean to revolutionize "iteravely"? A company that can incubate elegantly will (eventually) be able to harness faithfully. Think customized. Think compelling. Think user-centric. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this comes off as staggering to you, that's because it is! What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!