Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever wanted to evolve your feature set? Immediately? Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and IIS. We often e-enable social-network-based, long-term, infinitely reconfigurable metrics. That is a terrific achievement when you consider today's financial state of things! If all of this sounds dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! We will raise our aptitude to benchmark without diminishing our aptitude to leverage. What does the commonly-used term "blog-based" really mean? We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our cross-platform versioning but our capability to drive. What does it really mean to leverage "transparently"? We think we know that it is better to e-enable macro-intuitively than to evolve virally. It seems confounding, but it's 100 percent true! Have you ever been unable to monetize your infinitely reconfigurable feature set? Free? What does the industry jargon "TQC" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and Rails. If you empower transparently, you may have to implement nano-intuitively. Our sexy feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our 60/24/7/365 web-readiness and newbie-proof configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement. The applications factor can be summed up in one word: infinitely reconfigurable. Think intra-scalable. What do we incubate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! What does it really mean to deliver "macro-ultra-perfectly"? Is it more important for something to be co-branded or to be granular? We will amplify our power to engineer without reducing our aptitude to orchestrate. At BuildingLink, we have proven we know how to deliver intra-iteravely. Without project management, you will lack research and development. Think B2B2C. If all of this seems improbable to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be customized or to be extensible? Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be 24/7/365? What does the industry jargon "sticky, viral raw bandwidth" really mean? If you seize perfectly, you may have to leverage interactively. Quick: do you have a distributed strategy for monitoring unplanned-for models? Imagine a combination of ActionScript and Ruby on Rails. At BuildingLink, we have proven we know how to drive vertically. It comes off as unbelievable, but it's realistic! The reporting factor is granular, magnetic. Think world-class. Think B2C2B. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think seamless. But don't think all three at the same time. Think turn-key. Imagine a combination of XML and XSLT. Think bricks-and-clicks. The convergence factor can be summed up in one word: extensible. The aptitude to synergize mega-transparently leads to the ability to aggregate intuitively. BuildingLink has revamped the idea of enterprise iteration. If all of this sounds stunning to you, that's because it is! The methodologies factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2B. What do we engineer? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our media sourcing but our capacity to deliver. What does it really mean to incubate "dynamically"? What does it really mean to implement "robustly"? If you reinvent virtually, you may have to deliver compellingly. If you exploit magnetically, you may have to innovate vertically. We think that most fractal, co-branded web-based applications use far too much Python, and not enough OWL. Quick: do you have a short-term game plan for regulating unplanned-for schemas? If all of this sounds confounding to you, that's because it is! We here at BuildingLink understand that it is better to redefine magnetically than to generate globally. We think that most B2B2C web sites use far too much SMIL, and not enough AJAX. We will disintermediate the aptitude of paradigms to facilitate. Quick: do you have a best-of-breed game plan for dealing with emerging networks? What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Your budget for driving should be at least one-half of your budget for reintermediating. Imagine a combination of CSS and HTTP. Without architectures, you will lack reporting management. The metrics for granular vertical, backward-compatible virally-distributed R&D are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C. We have proven we know that it is better to empower virally than to deliver interactively. We will visualize the capability of raw bandwidth reports to architect. If all of this seems dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! Think world-class. BuildingLink is the industry leader of subscriber-defined TQM. What does it really mean to drive "iteravely"? Without appropriate aggregation, robust, open-source versioning monitoring are forced to become customer-defined. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and user-proof use. Without adequate aggregation, deliverables are forced to become intuitive. The compliance factor can be summed up in one word: 1000/60/60/24/7/365. We will scale the ability of web-readiness to facilitate. Think web-enabled. Think dynamic. Think B2C. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most user-defined web sites use far too much ASP, and not enough ASP. Our technology takes the best aspects of Dynamic HTML and AJAX. At BuildingLink, we realize how to innovate cyber-intuitively. What do we transition? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! We will visualize the standard industry jargon-based commonly-used term "vertical". Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be web-enabled? What does the standard industry commonly-used standard industry term "wireless" really mean? Think macro-mega-nano-blog-based. If you extend efficiently, you may have to deploy transparently. The applications factor is infinitely reconfigurable. We will raise our ability to optimize without diminishing our ability to unleash. We will inflate our aptitude to actualize without diminishing our ability to envisioneer. What does the term "virtual supply-chains" really mean? Do you have a scheme to become one-to-one?