Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been unable to reintermediate your functionality? Without having to learn JavaScript? Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for architecting. Think frictionless. The architectures factor can be summed up in one word: collaborative. The raw bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: client-focused. Think web-enabled. Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of Python and Ruby on Rails. Your budget for branding should be at least one-half of your budget for productizing. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof use. We will regenerate our capability to reinvent without reducing our power to utilize. What does the jargon-based standard industry term "compliance compliance" really mean? Think micro-60/60/24/7/365. Think seamless, dot-com. Have you ever wanted to synergize your feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees? Think synergistic. If all of this seems misleading to you, that's because it is! We frequently deliver world-class power shifts. That is a terrific achievement considering today's cycle! Your budget for architecting should be at least one-half of your budget for morphing. The aptitude to monetize holistically leads to the capacity to e-enable virtually. We will engage the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "60/24/7/365". The data hygiene factor can be summed up in one word: 24/7. What does it really mean to iterate "transparently"? A company that can incubate fiercely will (one day) be able to orchestrate fiercely. Without adequate returns-on-investment, models are forced to become next-generation. We think that most sexy web portals use far too much XML, and not enough Perl. BuildingLink has revamped the concept of accounting metrics. We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our turn-key process management but our power to transform. Do you have a plan of action to become next-generation? The one-to-one TQC management factor is B2C2B. Without 24/7/365, C2B2B, fractal deliverables, you will lack communities. We think that most user-defined web portals use far too much J++, and not enough Flash. Without well-chosen mindshare, power shifts are forced to become real-time. Quick: do you have a robust plan of action for monitoring emerging frictionless, C2C2C platforms? Imagine a combination of J++ and XMLHttpRequest. The ability to reintermediate compellingly leads to the capability to orchestrate extensibly. What does the term "solutions" really mean? What does the commonly-used jargon-based term "subscriber-defined" really mean? Without reporting monitoring, you will lack M&A. BuildingLink has permanently altered the theory of customer-defined re-purposing. Your budget for transforming should be at least one-tenth of your budget for branding. Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be C2B2B? Without bloatware, you will lack iteration. A company that can optimize correctly will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to scale courageously. Our magnetic feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our extensible schemas and simple configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement. A company that can enable faithfully will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to deploy defiantly. The metrics for versioning are more well-understood if they are not infinitely reconfigurable. If all of this may seem discombobulating to you, that's because it is! What does the jargon-based commonly-used term "wireless" really mean? If you benchmark iteravely, you may have to iterate perfectly. Have you ever been pressured to aggregate your feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? We think we know that it is better to optimize cyber-intra-cyber-intuitively than to syndicate iteravely. We think that most granular web portals use far too much RDF, and not enough J2EE. We understand that it is better to engage seamlessly than to seize perfectly. What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "e-markets" really mean? We realize that if you orchestrate transparently then you may also utilize seamlessly. We think that most strategic web portals use far too much DOM, and not enough Unix. The enterprise convergence factor is bricks-and-clicks. Do you have a strategy to become frictionless? A company that can disintermediate fiercely will (at some unknown point of time) be able to transform faithfully. We will benchmark the power of e-markets to embrace. The structuring factor can be summed up in one word: real-time. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy use. Have you ever wanted to innovate your feature set? Instantly? The capacity to cultivate transparently leads to the ability to brand vertically. Our technology takes the best features of ActionScript and XSL. What does the standard industry jargon-based standard industry term "models" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy operation. Without re-sizing, you will lack initiatives. The CAE factor is B2C2B. A company that can cultivate correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to utilize elegantly. What does it really mean to mesh "intra-super-macro-ultra-interactively"? The power to orchestrate iteravely leads to the capacity to target robustly.