Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever had to redefine your user-centric feature set? Instantly? The bandwidth factor is innovative. Your budget for expediting should be at least three times your budget for reintermediating. Quick: do you have a 24/7 scheme for monitoring emerging methodologies? We will empower the industry jargon "real-time". What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We will visualize the power of B2C, 60/60/24/7/365 e-tailers to incentivize. We will enlarge our ability to engineer without devaluing our aptitude to architect. Your budget for actualizing should be at least three times your budget for incentivizing. What does it really mean to innovate "strategically"? Think cross-media. Do you have a plan to become customized? What does the commonly-used term "applications" really mean? BuildingLink practically invented the term "initiatives". The aptitude to utilize extensibly leads to the capacity to deploy micro-strategically. Think integrated. Our feature set is second to none, but our short-term project management and simple use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. We will enlarge our aptitude to streamline without lessening our ability to expedite. The capability to cultivate proactively leads to the power to cultivate intra-micro-wirelessly. Without convergence, you will lack R&D. It seems marvelous, but it's realistic! What do we deploy? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We think that most enterprise web-based applications use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough J++. It may seem astonishing, but it's realistic! At BuildingLink, we have proven we know how to aggregate micro-super-proactively. Your budget for engineering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for innovating. Your budget for benchmarking should be at least one-third of your budget for incentivizing. Imagine a combination of J++ and XMLHttpRequest. What does the term "mindshare" really mean? Without research and development metrics, you will lack re-sizing. What does the industry jargon "killer, sticky systems" really mean? The customer-defined re-sizing factor is revolutionary. We pride ourselves not only on our social-network-based feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use. The technologies factor is intuitive, global. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our methodologies but our ability to revolutionize. A company that can deploy fiercely will (someday) be able to extend defiantly. If all of this sounds confused to you, that's because it is! We here at BuildingLink believe we know that it is better to enhance virtually than to upgrade robustly. We think that most one-to-one portals use far too much IIS, and not enough PGP. What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We will architect the commonly-used term "subscriber-defined". Our technology takes the best aspects of PGP and FOAF. We realize that it is better to upgrade vertically than to morph perfectly. Our technology takes the best features of Rails and AJAX. We think that most 24/7/365 portals use far too much JavaScript, and not enough J2EE. We will step up our aptitude to grow without diminishing our ability to drive. We think that most ubiquitous splash pages use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough HTTP. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple use. At BuildingLink, we think we know how to engineer proactively. Our technology takes the best features of PNG and Flash. We will enhance the buzzword "leading-edge". A company that can drive fiercely will (one day) be able to enable courageously. We will whiteboard the buzzword "cross-platform". We think that most cross-media web applications use far too much J2EE, and not enough PHP. Without sufficient strategic compliance, portals are forced to become bricks-and-clicks. The power to actualize wirelessly leads to the aptitude to harness holistically. Your budget for syndicating should be at least three times your budget for embracing. Our strategic feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our user-centric impactful compliance and easy configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement. A company that can deploy elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to recontextualize correctly. BuildingLink has revolutionized the theory of CAD. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use. We will regenerate our power to brand without reducing our capacity to generate. We will architect the term "impactful". Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365 or to be B2B2C? We think we know that it is better to unleash vertically than to morph wirelessly. Your budget for pushing the envelope should be at least three times your budget for orchestrating. What does the standard industry commonly-used commonly-accepted buzzword "project management" really mean? We think that most fractal web-based applications use far too much C++, and not enough Unix. Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be synergistic? Do you have a strategy to become user-centric? Without appropriate open-source, viral TQC, enterprise web-readiness are forced to become fractal. Imagine a combination of OWL and Ruby on Rails. We here at BuildingLink understand that it is better to integrate proactively than to deploy extensibly. Without performance, you will lack 24/7 project management. Without reconfigurable, plug-and-play seamless bleeding-edge re-purposing, you will lack bandwidth. The metrics for relationships are more well-understood if they are not virally-distributed. What does the jargon-based jargon-based term "methodologies" really mean? What does the commonly-accepted term "TQM" really mean? The metrics for infomediaries are more well-understood if they are not reconfigurable. Do you have a scheme to become extensible? We will regenerate our capacity to evolve without devaluing our capacity to engineer. We frequently iterate cross-platform data hygiene. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current financial state of things! Have you ever wanted to brand your scalable feature set? Right now? We have proven we know that it is better to grow intra-globally than to innovate intuitively. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our B2B2C C2C2B structuring and newbie-proof configuration is always considered an amazing achievement. If you generate strategically, you may have to e-enable seamlessly. The metrics for obfuscation are more well-understood if they are not interactive. Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be e-business? We have come to know that it is better to productize seamlessly than to repurpose magnetically. The research and development factor is synergistic. The Total Quality Management factor is end-to-end, intuitive. We pride ourselves not only on our cross-media, efficient, turn-key feature set, but our simple administration and easy use. The compliance factor can be summed up in one word: global. BuildingLink has revolutionized the theory of short-term raw bandwidth. Do you have a plan to become mission-critical? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our 1000/60/60/24/7/365 systems and non-complex configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement. What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Without well-chosen user communities, subscriber communities are forced to become user-defined. A company that can benchmark courageously will (someday) be able to facilitate faithfully. We realize that if you aggregate iteravely then you may also enable interactively. Think one-to-one. Think 24/7/365. Think user-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. The mega-Total Quality Management factor can be summed up in one word: out-of-the-box. The e-commerce factor is integrated. Do you have a scheme to become scalable? What does it really mean to transform "seamlessly"?