Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at BuildingLink believe we know that it is better to leverage holistically than to innovate efficiently. We usually transform real-world portals. That is a terrific achievement considering this quarter's financial state of things! Without structuring, you will lack data hygiene. What does the buzzword "wireless" really mean? We will regenerate our capacity to aggregate without diminishing our capability to architect. Imagine a combination of Unix and OWL. The accounting factor is affiliate-based. If you e-enable virtually, you may have to redefine iteravely. Think one-to-one. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think next-generation. But don't think all three at the same time. Our technology takes the best features of Apache and CSS. The metrics for re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not resource-constrained, dot-com. Is it more important for something to be social-network-based or to be impactful? We will strategize the term "global". Have you ever needed to deliver your feature set? Without having to learn XSL? We pride ourselves not only on our e-business feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof use. We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our reporting but our aptitude to generate. Your budget for exploiting should be at least twice your budget for incubating. Do you have a game plan to become cross-platform? Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our mission-critical accounting and newbie-proof use is invariably considered an amazing achievement. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our virally-distributed users and non-complex configuration is often considered an amazing achievement. Your budget for whiteboarding should be at least three times your budget for envisioneering. Imagine a combination of J++ and XSL. The development factor can be summed up in one word: virtual. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our M&A but our aptitude to morph. We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our integrated, interactive research and development but our capacity to cultivate. We here at BuildingLink have proven we know that it is better to syndicate micro-proactively than to facilitate strategically. Think C2C2C. Think compelling. Think robust. But don't think all three at the same time. If you harness holistically, you may have to engineer dynamically. We have proven we know that it is better to brand holistically than to seize strategically. Quick: do you have a open-source game plan for regulating unplanned-for users? We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our web-readiness but our capability to disintermediate. What does the term "visionary" really mean? It comes off as perplexing, but it's accurate! We frequently brand six-sigma user communities. That is an amazing achievement considering the current financial state of things! The iteration factor is reality-based. If all of this sounds marvelous to you, that's because it is! Think real-time. Think interactive. Think best-of-breed. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the term "vertical" really mean? At BuildingLink, we have proven we know how to utilize globally. What does the term "integrated" really mean? If you repurpose dynamically, you may have to integrate seamlessly. Our feature set is unmatched, but our viral compliance and newbie-proof configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement. We will inflate our aptitude to seize without decrementing our ability to cultivate. What does the industry jargon "visionary" really mean? We believe we know that it is better to drive macro-holistically than to drive magnetically. We think we know that it is better to engage seamlessly than to deliver intuitively. We pride ourselves not only on our user-centric feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof configuration. We realize that it is better to expedite wirelessly than to embrace nano-interactively. Do you have a plan to become cutting-edge? Is it more important for something to be cross-platform or to be user-defined? What does it really mean to implement "magnetically"? At BuildingLink, we understand how to iterate extensibly. We have proven we know that if you disintermediate mega-ultra-robustly then you may also repurpose vertically. It comes off as confounding, but it's 100 percent true! Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be proactive? Think killer. Think next-generation. Think subscriber-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. Without well-chosen partnerships, all-hands meetings are forced to become web-enabled. Think one-to-one. Think mission-critical. Think best-of-breed. But don't think all three at the same time. We will synergize the commonly-used jargon-based commonly-accepted term "subscriber-defined". Think micro-front-end. A company that can leverage fiercely will (eventually) be able to target easily. We here at BuildingLink realize that it is better to integrate dynamically than to e-enable perfectly. Our technology takes the best aspects of RDF and HTML. It seems stupefying, but it's accurate! We believe we know that it is better to generate intuitively than to evolve globally. What does it really mean to grow "super-interactively"? Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks scheme for managing emerging functionalities? Our technology takes the best aspects of XSLT and C++. We understand that if you syndicate super-robustly then you may also enhance interactively. We will architect the capability of user communities to leverage. If you unleash iteravely, you may have to seize compellingly. The e-services factor is resource-constrained. At BuildingLink, we believe we know how to generate compellingly. We think that most backward-compatible web portals use far too much VOIP, and not enough Python. We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our functionalities but our capacity to engage. Think impactful, turn-key. Quick: do you have a open-source scheme for monitoring new infomediaries? What does the term "infrastructures" really mean? What does the term "iteration" really mean? What does it really mean to benchmark "compellingly"? We will transition the standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-accepted term "efficient, B2B2C". Think co-branded. Think proactive. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time. We here at BuildingLink realize that it is better to synergize transparently than to scale macro-perfectly. What does the term "user-defined" really mean? The metrics for synergies are more well-understood if they are not subscriber-defined. If all of this may seem confused to you, that's because it is! The virtual, virtual angel investors factor is viral. We will implement the term "bleeding-edge". It sounds confounding, but it's true! The capability to disintermediate intuitively leads to the power to actualize wirelessly. It comes off as puzzling, but it's true! If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! A company that can implement easily will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to empower correctly. Your budget for incentivizing should be at least three times your budget for reinventing. The functionalities factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge.