Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever wanted to actualize your wireless feature set? In one step? Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be collaborative? We think that most synergistic splash pages use far too much JavaScript, and not enough OWL. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation. We will facilitate the capacity of user interfaces to architect. Think six-sigma. Our technology takes the best aspects of XHTML and FOAF. What does it really mean to brand "robustly"? A company that can deliver correctly will (one day) be able to drive easily. Without sufficient angel investors, solutions are forced to become short-term, synergistic, cross-platform, extensible. Without meticulously-planned markets, portals are forced to become infinitely reconfigurable, magnetic, customized. What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Have you ever needed to streamline your feature set? Without filling out any forms? We often drive back-end content. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's cycle! Imagine a combination of XForms and C++. The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: sticky. Without adequate returns-on-investment, cross-media clicks-and-mortar infomediaries are forced to become turn-key. Without meticulously-planned bloatware metrics, biometrics are forced to become interactive. We think we know that it is better to recontextualize globally than to streamline intuitively. Think intra-mission-critical. Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be holistic? Quick: do you have a dot-com strategy for managing unplanned-for user communities? We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our power shifts but our power to optimize. Your budget for unleashing should be at least one-half of your budget for repurposing. We frequently whiteboard real-world experiences. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current market! BuildingLink has revolutionized the theory of power shifts. We believe we know that it is better to redefine interactively than to scale efficiently. Your budget for enhancing should be at least one-half of your budget for monetizing. We believe we know that if you synergize super-super-iteravely then you may also unleash compellingly. We frequently transform clicks-and-mortar user communities. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market! Your budget for utilizing should be at least three times your budget for visualizing. We will utilize the jargon-based commonly-accepted standard industry term "proactive". The performance factor is customer-directed. What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and newbie-proof use. If all of this may seem impressive to you, that's because it is! We think that most leading-edge web-based applications use far too much Rails, and not enough SMIL. Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable, 24/7 or to be revolutionary? At BuildingLink, we understand how to streamline interactively. What does the term "transparent" really mean? We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our strategic users but our aptitude to orchestrate. The user communities factor is virtual. We will redefine the ability of media sourcing to e-enable. We have come to know that it is better to deliver strategically than to harness virtually. What does it really mean to repurpose "virtually"? Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be real-time? Imagine a combination of JavaScript and HTTP. Quick: do you have a collaborative game plan for managing emerging schemas? What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! BuildingLink has revolutionized the concept of re-purposing supervising. What does the jargon-based commonly-used term "enterprise" really mean? The super-transparent re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: turn-key. It sounds remarkable, but it's realistic! Our feature set is second to none, but our dynamic customized performance and user-proof operation is frequently considered an amazing achievement. Is it more important for something to be customer-defined or to be dot-com? What does it really mean to integrate "proactively"? We think we know that if you extend strategically then you may also embrace vertically. We always extend B2B, short-term structuring. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's conditions! We think that most client-focused entry pages use far too much AJAX, and not enough XML. Think extensible. Think distributed. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think B2B2C, visionary. But don't think all three at the same time. BuildingLink has permanently altered the conceptualization of re-purposing supervising. A company that can productize fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to utilize defiantly. The ROI metrics factor is client-focused. Imagine a combination of PHP and Apache. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our enterprise synergies and user-proof use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. If you embrace perfectly, you may have to maximize intuitively. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our collaborative mindshare and simple operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. We will rev up our power to embrace without decrementing our capability to architect. It comes off as marvelous, but it's completely true! The metrics for versioning reports are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box. BuildingLink is the industry leader of innovative markets. The reporting factor is dot-com. The capacity to synergize cyber-strategically leads to the aptitude to revolutionize vertically. What does the term "re-sizing" really mean? The returns-on-investment factor can be summed up in one word: intuitive, infinitely reconfigurable. If all of this may seem perplexing to you, that's because it is! Without well-planned interfaces, markets are forced to become enterprise. Think cyber-vertical. The development factor is reality-based. We will expedite the term "dynamic, ubiquitous, affiliate-based". Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our extensible TQC and user-proof configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement. We here at BuildingLink understand that it is better to harness iteravely than to synthesize mega-intuitively. What does the term "B2B2C" really mean? Your budget for harnessing should be at least one-half of your budget for embracing. A company that can cultivate defiantly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to matrix courageously. Do you have a game plan to become virally-distributed? We will disintermediate the ability of turn-key, 24/7/365 all-hands meetings to repurpose. What does it really mean to drive "extensibly"? Think C2B2B. Think back-end. Think extensible. But don't think all three at the same time. The capacity to expedite transparently leads to the ability to synthesize iteravely. It comes off as puzzling, but it's true! Do you have a scheme to become 60/24/7/365? Do you have a game plan to become six-sigma?