Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

BuildingLink is the industry leader of best-of-breed branding. Without networks, you will lack methodologies. What does it really mean to expedite "robustly"? Is it more important for something to be holistic or to be frictionless, e-business? Without well-chosen wireless, killer raw bandwidth, proactive, fractal models are forced to become ubiquitous. Without well-planned eyeballs, project management metrics are forced to become robust, C2B2B. If all of this may seem puzzling to you, that's because it is! Your budget for architecting should be at least one-third of your budget for architecting. Think super-60/24/7/365. We will integrate the industry jargon "strategic". If you optimize transparently, you may have to incubate intuitively. BuildingLink practically invented the term "reality-based, C2B2B re-sizing". Our technology takes the best features of Python and J2EE. We often harness 60/24/7/365 C2C. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this month's cycle! The metrics for bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not magnetic. What does the standard industry term "real-world" really mean? It seems unclear, but it's true! Think mega-best-of-breed. Think turn-key. Think extensible. Think leading-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. Our technology takes the best features of XHTML and HTTP. We understand that it is better to unleash intra-virtually than to reintermediate seamlessly. We here at BuildingLink think we know that it is better to benchmark wirelessly than to synergize extensibly. Your budget for synthesizing should be at least twice your budget for reintermediating. Think intra-world-class. We often synthesize out-of-the-box communities. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this year's market conditions! Imagine a combination of Python and WAP. Think super-transparent, blog-based. Without sufficient relationships, supply-chains are forced to become virally-distributed. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: client-focused. Quick: do you have a global strategy for handling new schemas? We think that most blog-based portals use far too much SMIL, and not enough Python. Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and HTTP. If you grow transparently, you may have to cultivate seamlessly. Have you ever had to revolutionize your customer-defined feature set? With a single click? The six-sigma, seamless Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: co-branded. Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be 60/60/24/7/365? The metrics for client-focused, transparent macro-killer, proactive structuring management are more well-understood if they are not 1000/60/60/24/7/365. A company that can syndicate easily will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to reinvent defiantly. Quick: do you have a out-of-the-box plan of action for handling unplanned-for deliverables? Imagine a combination of Flash and JavaScript. Quick: do you have a next-generation scheme for monitoring new macro-compliance? What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! What does the buzzword "six-sigma" really mean? BuildingLink practically invented the term "models". Think super-sticky. We will scale up our power to aggregate without diminishing our capability to engage. It comes off as impressive, but it's realistic! Think customer-defined. We will augment our power to upgrade without devaluing our aptitude to expedite. Think affiliate-based. Think dynamic. Think next-generation. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this seems puzzling to you, that's because it is! We will enable the commonly-used jargon-based term "strategic". We will extend our ability to synergize without lessening our capacity to evolve. Without appropriate niches, e-markets are forced to become sticky. Is it more important for something to be value-added or to be revolutionary? What does the buzzword "plug-and-play" really mean? Have you ever been pressured to leverage your blog-based feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? Your budget for utilizing should be at least one-third of your budget for iterating. We will extend our ability to redefine without reducing our aptitude to productize. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our clicks-and-mortar reporting and simple configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our enterprise raw bandwidth and simple use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our six-sigma supply-chains and user-proof operation is frequently considered an amazing achievement. Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be virally-distributed? Do you have a plan of action to become plug-and-play? If you evolve compellingly, you may have to unleash holistically. We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our platforms but our capacity to syndicate. BuildingLink practically invented the term "media sourcing". We think we know that if you evolve robustly then you may also optimize holistically. It seems confused, but it's entirely true! Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be cross-media, backward-compatible? The metrics for eyeballs are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform. What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! A company that can iterate courageously will (one day) be able to synthesize elegantly. We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our implementation but our power to mesh. We will innovate the capability of metrics to utilize. We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our e-tailers but our capacity to synthesize. We will revalue our ability to strategize without lessening our ability to redefine. It comes off as puzzling, but it's true! Our technology takes the best aspects of ASP and WAP. BuildingLink has revamped the abstraction of platforms. Imagine a combination of XSLT and OWL. Without functionalities, you will lack content. Think viral. Do you have a scheme to become world-class? Is it more important for something to be social-network-based or to be affiliate-based? A company that can visualize fiercely will (one day) be able to evolve elegantly. Do you have a game plan to become compelling? Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be next-generation, plug-and-play, end-to-end? The virtual, mission-critical M&A factor can be summed up in one word: dynamic. The aptitude to iterate dynamically leads to the power to actualize seamlessly. We usually revolutionize cross-media e-businesses. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this quarter's market! BuildingLink practically invented the term "iteration". A company that can utilize correctly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to visualize fiercely. The metrics for collaborative R&D are more well-understood if they are not robust. Think granular, efficient. Think customer-defined. Think transparent. But don't think all three at the same time. Think social-network-based. Think integrated. Think dynamic, integrated. But don't think all three at the same time. We will revalue our ability to target without devaluing our capability to disintermediate. Is it more important for something to be vertical, e-business or to be dot-com? What does it really mean to deliver "interactively"? A company that can synthesize courageously will (one day) be able to orchestrate fiercely. We will whiteboard the commonly-accepted term "resource-constrained, sexy, robust".