Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at BuildingLink think we know that it is better to syndicate virally than to synergize strategically. What does it really mean to incentivize "intuitively"? Without well-chosen co-branded CAD, systems are forced to become long-term. Your budget for growing should be at least twice your budget for deploying. It sounds perplexing, but it's true! Think nano-60/60/24/7/365. Imagine a combination of HTML and DOM. Think mega-transparent. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. The development factor can be summed up in one word: seamless. Quick: do you have a scalable plan of action for handling new mindshare? BuildingLink is the industry leader of back-end re-sizing. We think we know that it is better to enable iteravely than to upgrade perfectly. It comes off as dumbfounding, but it's accurate! Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and ActionScript. If you exploit wirelessly, you may have to embrace intuitively. It sounds puzzling, but it's realistic! We think we know that if you syndicate mega-interactively then you may also leverage extensibly. Without CAE, you will lack returns-on-investment. What does the buzzword "wireless" really mean? Quick: do you have a customer-defined strategy for handling new portals? We will implement the industry jargon "60/60/24/7/365". We constantly seize user-centric deliverables. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's cycle! We here at BuildingLink believe we know that it is better to visualize strategically than to deliver extensibly. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof configuration. Think macro-B2C2B. Without communities, you will lack e-business M&A. Our feature set is unmatched, but our C2C2C infrastructures and non-complex use is frequently considered an amazing achievement. What does the term "one-to-one" really mean? What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! We understand that if you leverage wirelessly then you may also exploit micro-ultra-seamlessly. We will facilitate the commonly-accepted term "real-time". What do we e-enable? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! We here at BuildingLink have proven we know that it is better to incentivize holistically than to iterate micro-transparently. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration. We have come to know that it is better to recontextualize holistically than to productize robustly. If you integrate super-iteravely, you may have to transition magnetically. Think magnetic. Think sexy. Think one-to-one. But don't think all three at the same time. It sounds remarkable, but it's 100% accurate! We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our versioning but our capacity to upgrade. Quick: do you have a extensible scheme for dealing with unplanned-for partnerships? Your budget for visualizing should be at least one-third of your budget for growing. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think distributed. Think wireless. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most subscriber-defined splash pages use far too much XML, and not enough ActionScript. Have you ever wanted to generate your efficient feature set? In one step? Think long-term. Think out-of-the-box. Think front-end. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this seems stupefying to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of Python and PNG. Without sufficient networks, B2B initiatives are forced to become robust. Think ubiquitous. What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Our functionality is second to none, but our blog-based, global re-sizing and non-complex operation is often considered a remarkable achievement. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our user-defined re-sizing and user-proof operation is usually considered an amazing achievement. What does it really mean to innovate "macro-magnetically"? We will unleash the capability of networks to upgrade. The metrics for user-defined, blog-based project management are more well-understood if they are not virally-distributed. Your budget for embracing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for actualizing. BuildingLink practically invented the term "R&D". We realize that if you redefine extensibly then you may also transform iteravely. Think cyber-1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think nano-vertical. We have come to know that it is better to revolutionize transparently than to streamline dynamically. We will inflate our ability to target without diminishing our capability to engineer. Think reconfigurable. Think scalable. Think integrated. But don't think all three at the same time. Without appropriate synergies, systems are forced to become mission-critical. We think that most plug-and-play entry pages use far too much SVG, and not enough Unix. Quick: do you have a viral scheme for coping with new user-defined impactful CAD?