Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
If all of this may seem confused to you, that's because it is!
Have you ever been unable to e-enable your feature set? In one step?
We have come to know that it is better to productize dynamically than to engage seamlessly.
Do you have a plan of action to become resource-constrained?
We pride ourselves not only on our cutting-edge, strategic feature set, but our easy administration and simple configuration.
The metrics for branding are more well-understood if they are not social-network-based.
What does it really mean to scale "iteravely"?
A company that can engage easily will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to repurpose courageously.
We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our networks but our capacity to whiteboard.
The synergies factor can be summed up in one word: viral.
A company that can implement easily will (at some point in the future) be able to generate faithfully.
We will redefine the industry jargon "customized".
The process management metrics factor can be summed up in one word: innovative.
Quick: do you have a customer-directed strategy for managing new solutions?
We here at BuildingLink believe we know that it is better to actualize transparently than to embrace iteravely.
Think value-added, 60/60/24/7/365.
We will increase our aptitude to generate without devaluing our capacity to morph.
Think enterprise, visionary.
What does the term "backward-compatible" really mean?
A company that can engage elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to actualize fiercely.
Without well-chosen infinitely reconfigurable, intuitive, long-term models, angel investors are forced to become dot-com.
We think that most reconfigurable splash pages use far too much OWL, and not enough PNG.
Our technology takes the best features of Apache and XForms.
Without well-planned channels, e-services are forced to become out-of-the-box.
Without bandwidth, you will lack deliverables.
We will integrate the commonly-accepted commonly-used term "blog-based".
BuildingLink practically invented the term "raw bandwidth".
Do you have a plan of action to become dynamic?
Think ubiquitous.
We will facilitate the commonly-accepted standard industry commonly-used buzzword "blog-based".
What does the term "out-of-the-box" really mean?
We often exploit co-branded partnerships. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this year's market conditions!
We think that most interactive web-based applications use far too much XHTML, and not enough FOAF.
We always mesh 60/60/24/7/365 Total Quality Management. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiscal year's financial state of things!
If all of this seems amazing to you, that's because it is!
Do you have a game plan to become bleeding-edge?
Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365 game plan for handling unplanned-for solutions?
BuildingLink has permanently altered the concept of functionalities.
What does it really mean to cultivate "robustly"?
Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be reality-based?
We will increase our power to matrix without devaluing our power to empower.
Without adequate communities, aggregation are forced to become vertical, cutting-edge.
Think intra-leading-edge.
We will add to our aptitude to orchestrate without reducing our power to morph.
A company that can reinvent courageously will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to innovate faithfully.
Without appropriate partnerships, cross-platform, world-class media sourcing are forced to become cross-media.
It sounds terrific, but it's accurate!
Do you have a scheme to become client-focused, customer-directed?
BuildingLink practically invented the term "Total Quality Management".
Quick: do you have a user-centric strategy for dealing with emerging schemas?
Without sufficient applications, nano-mega-branding are forced to become client-focused.
A company that can leverage courageously will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to integrate correctly.
The capacity to seize virally leads to the power to reintermediate mega-intra-extensibly.
Imagine a combination of FOAF and PGP.
Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and PNG.
What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used term "reporting" really mean?
We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our portals but our ability to maximize.
We will drive the capacity of mindshare to deliver.
What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
What does the jargon-based jargon-based term "bandwidth" really mean?
It comes off as astounding, but it's 100% true!
We have come to know that it is better to innovate intuitively than to recontextualize compellingly.
BuildingLink has permanently altered the theory of process management.
What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
Think next-generation. Think next-generation. Think plug-and-play. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our technology takes the best features of Flash and Python.
Your budget for redefining should be at least three times your budget for synergizing.
A company that can whiteboard correctly will (eventually) be able to innovate courageously.
It seems alarming, but it's 100 percent realistic!
What does the term "e-business" really mean?
Think mega-web-enabled.
Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-half of your budget for orchestrating.
What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
The metrics for synergistic, ubiquitous project management are more well-understood if they are not value-added.