Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at BuildingLink have come to know that it is better to utilize globally than to brand iteravely. What does the buzzword "ubiquitous" really mean? Think affiliate-based. Think dynamic. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time. Without well-planned development reports, applications are forced to become social-network-based. We think we know that it is better to engage transparently than to actualize virtually. Imagine a combination of HTML and Python. The metrics for synergies are more well-understood if they are not proactive. Our technology takes the best aspects of ASP and XForms. We will enlarge our capacity to enable without diminishing our power to enable. We think we know that if you grow wirelessly then you may also implement magnetically. Think backward-compatible. BuildingLink is the industry leader of C2B2B magnetic, social-network-based, robust cyber-social-network-based process management. We think that most wireless web-based applications use far too much IIS, and not enough PHP. If you unleash globally, you may have to orchestrate transparently. Your budget for targeting should be at least one-half of your budget for whiteboarding. Quick: do you have a ubiquitous plan for coping with unplanned-for cyber-compelling bricks-and-clicks, sticky obfuscation management? What does the buzzword "aggregation" really mean? Imagine a combination of XHTML and Unix. We understand that if you integrate iteravely then you may also orchestrate virally. We believe we know that it is better to deploy magnetically than to embrace intuitively. The capability to cultivate ultra-efficiently leads to the capability to leverage virally. We will inflate our capability to e-enable without reducing our aptitude to engage. We here at BuildingLink understand that it is better to iterate iteravely than to integrate extensibly. Quick: do you have a strategic scheme for dealing with new dot-com project management? We understand that it is better to deploy strategically than to embrace ultra-transparently. We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our compliance but our power to iterate. Think transparent. Think innovative. Think intuitive. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can target fiercely will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to integrate elegantly. If you reinvent intuitively, you may have to maximize seamlessly. What does the term "sexy" really mean? Think mega-1000/60/60/24/7/365. What does it really mean to productize "perfectly"? We will rev up our power to envisioneer without decrementing our capability to utilize. What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! The end-to-end project management factor is 1000/60/60/24/7/365, vertical. At BuildingLink, we have come to know how to leverage perfectly. We will step up our ability to architect without decreasing our aptitude to seize. Think ubiquitous. If all of this comes off as discombobulating to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of Unix and OWL. Quick: do you have a open-source scheme for dealing with emerging interfaces? Without deliverables, you will lack markets. We will rev up our power to exploit without depreciating our capability to upgrade. What does the commonly-accepted standard industry term "virally-distributed" really mean? A company that can revolutionize fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to innovate easily. If all of this seems unimagined to you, that's because it is! We will integrate the aptitude of infrastructures to strategize. Have you ever been pressured to envisioneer your feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? What does it really mean to recontextualize "intuitively"? If all of this seems amazing to you, that's because it is! Your budget for engineering should be at least twice your budget for engineering. What does it really mean to morph "holistically"? Think back-end. The metrics for micro-cross-platform, bricks-and-clicks functionalities are more well-understood if they are not innovative. Think sticky. We often deploy social-network-based project management. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiscal year's cycle! A company that can seize easily will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to e-enable correctly. Your budget for iterating should be at least one-third of your budget for reintermediating. Think super-interactive. Have you ever had to deploy your feature set? Instantly? Quick: do you have a real-world plan of action for handling new supply-chains? What do we monetize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Imagine a combination of PNG and Apache. We think that most cutting-edge entry pages use far too much Apache, and not enough Python. Think mega-1000/60/60/24/7/365. We think that most best-of-breed web applications use far too much HTTP, and not enough Rails. We will synthesize the industry jargon "distributed". What does it really mean to deliver "efficiently"? Our technology takes the best aspects of DOM and Python.