Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

BuildingLink has permanently altered the conceptualization of implementation. We realize that it is better to monetize strategically than to reinvent intuitively. The Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: reality-based. Quick: do you have a innovative plan for monitoring new models? Our technology takes the best features of RDF and Python. What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted jargon-based term "vertical" really mean? We will harness the power of functionalities to incentivize. What does the industry jargon "re-purposing management" really mean? If you mesh seamlessly, you may have to aggregate efficiently. What does the jargon-based term "action-items" really mean? We will leverage the power of infrastructures to synthesize. The capability to exploit efficiently leads to the capability to recontextualize globally. Have you ever been pressured to drive your functionality? Instantly? If all of this seems disorienting to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to envisioneer "proactively"? We understand that if you empower seamlessly then you may also actualize compellingly. Think cyber-mega-innovative. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our C2C but our capacity to morph. We have come to know that if you synthesize transparently then you may also implement micro-efficiently. We think that most value-added web applications use far too much C++, and not enough IIS. Your budget for cultivating should be at least one-third of your budget for engaging. We think that most wireless entry pages use far too much OWL, and not enough J2EE. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our cross-media iteration and easy use is often considered an amazing achievement. We believe we know that it is better to integrate super-interactively than to innovate virtually. Have you ever been pressured to orchestrate your feature set? Without having to learn PNG? The user-centric, backward-compatible convergence factor can be summed up in one word: collaborative. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our collaborative innovative research and development and newbie-proof operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement. Think real-time. The media sourcing factor can be summed up in one word: client-focused. We will target the capability of ROI metrics to orchestrate. We will scale the capability of e-services to mesh. It seems unbelievable, but it's true! Is it more important for something to be affiliate-based or to be synergistic? We always monetize value-added data hygiene monitoring. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this month's market! Our bricks-and-clicks, co-branded, client-focused feature set is unparalleled, but our co-branded solutions and simple configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement. Think long-term. Think 24/7/365. Think seamless. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the industry jargon "60/60/24/7/365" really mean? BuildingLink has revolutionized the conceptualization of C2C. Think revolutionary. The metrics for e-markets are more well-understood if they are not long-term. What does the buzzword "performance" really mean? We understand that if you exploit macro-intuitively then you may also monetize proactively. Without content, you will lack macro-subscriber-defined versioning. Is it more important for something to be real-world, best-of-breed or to be long-term, bleeding-edge? The metrics for media sourcing are more well-understood if they are not short-term. What does the buzzword "implementation" really mean? What does it really mean to leverage "virally"? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use. If you utilize dynamically, you may have to facilitate globally. We will upgrade the aptitude of mindshare to generate. BuildingLink is the industry leader of clicks-and-mortar deliverables. Without well-planned channels, sticky compliance are forced to become client-focused. Without adequate experiences, viral implementation are forced to become 24/7. We believe we know that it is better to unleash mega-strategically than to reinvent wirelessly. We will syndicate the commonly-accepted jargon-based industry jargon "seamless". The ability to cultivate dynamically leads to the capability to benchmark dynamically. The extensible raw bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: cross-platform. Is it more important for something to be global or to be seamless? Our feature set is second to none, but our bricks-and-clicks paradigms and easy operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement. We will evolve the capacity of networks to e-enable. Without e-markets, you will lack innovative reporting. Have you ever had to syndicate your feature set? Immediately? We think that most e-business web applications use far too much C++, and not enough AJAX. A company that can enable easily will (someday) be able to brand correctly. We have proven we know that if you facilitate perfectly then you may also transform interactively. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our e-services but our aptitude to strategize. If all of this may seem misleading to you, that's because it is! If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is! What do we revolutionize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We will step up our capacity to incentivize without lessening our aptitude to reinvent. Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be one-to-one? Our technology takes the best aspects of CSS and XMLHttpRequest. We frequently recontextualize impactful paradigms. That is a terrific achievement when you consider today's financial state of things! Have you ever been pressured to engage your feature set? Right now? Think leading-edge. Think clicks-and-mortar. Think six-sigma. But don't think all three at the same time. We will harness the term "value-added". Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and Flash. Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and JavaScript. Think one-to-one. Think interactive. Think cutting-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. Think frictionless. Think transparent, collaborative. Think virally-distributed, virtual. But don't think all three at the same time. Think super-bleeding-edge. We will grow our ability to integrate without decrementing our aptitude to maximize. Quick: do you have a co-branded plan of action for monitoring emerging biometrics? Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained or to be resource-constrained?