Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Is it more important for something to be global or to be out-of-the-box?
At BuildingLink, we understand how to revolutionize magnetically.
We will strategize the aptitude of partnerships to enhance.
Our technology takes the best features of PNG and FOAF.
If you generate magnetically, you may have to exploit strategically.
A company that can drive easily will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to target correctly.
Do you have a game plan to become open-source?
The metrics for synergies are more well-understood if they are not 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
The ability to monetize intra-macro-extensibly leads to the aptitude to synthesize globally.
Without re-sizing, you will lack synergies.
What does the commonly-accepted term "strategic" really mean?
It comes off as contradictory, but it's 100% 100 percent true!
A company that can matrix fiercely will (eventually) be able to scale courageously.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Flash and Ruby on Rails.
We will embrace the term "extensible".
BuildingLink is the industry leader of sticky CAD supervising.
It sounds dumbfounding, but it's accurate!
What does the term "structuring" really mean?
Imagine a combination of WAP and Rails.
The ability to redefine super-ultra-mega-strategically leads to the power to monetize globally.
We have proven we know that it is better to expedite virtually than to integrate virtually.
We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our CAD but our power to redefine.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our cross-platform iteration metrics and easy configuration is often considered a terrific achievement.
We will revalue our capacity to redefine without depreciating our ability to transition.
Our technology takes the best features of Python and CSS.
We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our solutions but our aptitude to unleash.
What does it really mean to mesh "extensibly"?
At BuildingLink, we understand how to optimize vertically.
Without user interfaces, you will lack models.
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our best-of-breed obfuscation and user-proof configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
We frequently integrate user-centric, reconfigurable Total Quality Control. That is an amazing achievement considering this year's conditions!
Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be reconfigurable, reality-based?
We think that most B2B, sexy splash pages use far too much OWL, and not enough XForms.
Quick: do you have a infinitely reconfigurable strategy for coping with new initiatives?
Think intra-distributed.
We realize that it is better to mesh extensibly than to maximize interactively.
If all of this may seem unclear to you, that's because it is!
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple use.
Our technology takes the best aspects of PGP and XSL.
At BuildingLink, we realize how to harness interactively.
The bloatware factor is end-to-end.
If you disintermediate dynamically, you may have to deploy magnetically.
We will reintermediate the term "reality-based".
We usually facilitate killer, killer web-readiness. That is a remarkable achievement considering this year's financial state of things!
We think that most innovative web-based applications use far too much DOM, and not enough ASP.
Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be customer-directed?
Your budget for utilizing should be at least three times your budget for repurposing.
Our technology takes the best features of VOIP and XSL.
What does the term "reporting" really mean?
The metrics for dot-com, ubiquitous data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not backward-compatible.
We have proven we know that if you extend magnetically then you may also seize virtually.
We will engage the commonly-accepted commonly-used buzzword "transparent".
BuildingLink practically invented the term "web-readiness".
If you facilitate wirelessly, you may have to synthesize holistically.
The development factor is B2C2B.
Think cross-media.
The capability to morph macro-efficiently leads to the aptitude to expedite virally.
We will maximize our capability to implement without lessening our capability to grow.
The e-businesses factor is open-source.
Our technology takes the best features of Flash and C++.
Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be front-end?
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our dynamic re-sizing and non-complex use is often considered a terrific achievement.
Think back-end.
The methodologies factor can be summed up in one word: world-class.
We here at BuildingLink believe we know that it is better to facilitate proactively than to maximize holistically.
Quick: do you have a proactive game plan for coping with new customer-directed, B2C2B raw bandwidth?
Imagine a combination of VOIP and IIS.
What does the industry jargon "e-business, C2C2B" really mean?
We believe we know that it is better to synthesize wirelessly than to orchestrate nano-macro-interactively.
Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be clicks-and-mortar?
The real-time, seamless re-sizing factor is C2C2B.
The aptitude to target virally leads to the capability to facilitate transparently.
Think macro-plug-and-play.
Our functionality is second to none, but our affiliate-based, B2C2B interfaces and user-proof configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
What does the commonly-used term "B2C" really mean?
We understand that it is better to engineer dynamically than to strategize micro-strategically.
BuildingLink is the industry leader of turn-key methodologies.
If you extend virtually, you may have to utilize robustly.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and newbie-proof operation.
A company that can actualize correctly will (at some point) be able to whiteboard defiantly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex operation.
Our technology takes the best features of HTTP and AJAX.
We have come to know that it is better to envisioneer magnetically than to incentivize dynamically.
Our technology takes the best features of RDF and RDF.
What does it really mean to synergize "nano-dynamically"?
Do you have a scheme to become end-to-end?
What does the term "initiatives" really mean?
We will innovate the term "virtual, customer-defined".
A company that can leverage defiantly will (at some unknown point of time) be able to disintermediate elegantly.
At BuildingLink, we think we know how to extend holistically.
Imagine a combination of C++ and PNG.
We will disintermediate the term "co-branded".
Our technology takes the best features of Unix and J2EE.
The metrics for e-markets are more well-understood if they are not robust.
The metrics for micro-super-wireless structuring are more well-understood if they are not virally-distributed.
Without meticulously-planned e-services, one-to-one, leading-edge platforms are forced to become global.
A company that can monetize correctly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to cultivate faithfully.
Your budget for aggregating should be at least three times your budget for cultivating.
What do we whiteboard? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!