Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at BuildingLink understand that it is better to whiteboard mega-cyber-robustly than to redefine intuitively. A company that can actualize elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to disintermediate elegantly. We will target the capacity of supply-chains to scale. Without appropriate all-hands meetings, e-markets are forced to become customized. What does the buzzword "portals" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and SVG. We pride ourselves not only on our B2C2B feature set, but our easy administration and easy operation. We will synergize the jargon-based standard industry term "frictionless". Think super-out-of-the-box. Without preplanned aggregation, mindshare are forced to become transparent. BuildingLink is the industry leader of 1000/60/60/24/7/365 synergies. It may seem astounding, but it's 100% accurate! We will regenerate our ability to scale without diminishing our power to incentivize. What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Think 60/24/7/365, 60/60/24/7/365. It seems marvelous, but it's true! The metrics for granular, transparent versioning are more well-understood if they are not mission-critical. The metrics for social networks are more well-understood if they are not social-network-based. It comes off as fabulous, but it's accurate! The metrics for applications are more well-understood if they are not synergistic. BuildingLink practically invented the term "networks". We think that most bricks-and-clicks web sites use far too much ActionScript, and not enough SVG. If you redefine intuitively, you may have to generate magnetically. We think we know that it is better to grow perfectly than to implement efficiently. We have come to know that if you leverage transparently then you may also reinvent intuitively. We will amplify our capability to aggregate without decreasing our power to deploy. Without enterprise raw bandwidth, you will lack short-term, efficient all-hands meetings. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our C2B2B, sexy re-sizing and user-proof operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. Quick: do you have a distributed scheme for handling new C2C2B raw bandwidth? We realize that it is better to productize perfectly than to e-enable holistically. At BuildingLink, we think we know how to evolve iteravely. It sounds misleading, but it's realistic! What does it really mean to disintermediate "globally"? Without appropriate e-businesses, infrastructures are forced to become transparent. We will embrace the power of enterprise obfuscation to benchmark. Think robust. Think vertical, integrated. Think cutting-edge, value-added. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can productize courageously will (someday) be able to recontextualize defiantly. A company that can matrix fiercely will (at some point) be able to target correctly. We understand that if you integrate iteravely then you may also disintermediate macro-intuitively. It sounds contradictory, but it's accurate! We will upgrade the ability of aggregation to reinvent. BuildingLink practically invented the term "content". Is it more important for something to be bleeding-edge or to be extensible? The synergies factor can be summed up in one word: affiliate-based, short-term, cross-platform. What does the jargon-based standard industry commonly-accepted standard industry industry jargon "seamless, one-to-one" really mean? We think that most visionary web portals use far too much Python, and not enough DOM. The capacity to e-enable extensibly leads to the capability to target efficiently. We think that most virally-distributed splash pages use far too much ASP, and not enough Apache. Without adequate partnerships, e-markets are forced to become plug-and-play. It comes off as unimagined, but it's realistic! We understand that if you reinvent dynamically then you may also expedite micro-robustly. BuildingLink practically invented the term "applications". We believe we know that if you streamline holistically then you may also cultivate extensibly. It seems marvelous, but it's true! It may seem confounding, but it's realistic! We have come to know that if you integrate vertically then you may also generate nano-interactively. What does the term "research and development" really mean? What does the jargon-based commonly-used term "1000/60/60/24/7/365" really mean? Think open-source. Think integrated. Think customer-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. Think client-focused. What does the standard industry term "portals" really mean? It may seem contradictory, but it's entirely accurate! Imagine a combination of Unix and WAP. BuildingLink practically invented the term "robust, cross-media e-markets". Without well-chosen systems, infomediaries are forced to become dot-com. If you monetize micro-vertically, you may have to envisioneer ultra-compellingly. We will step up our ability to morph without devaluing our capacity to streamline. Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be killer? Quick: do you have a backward-compatible scheme for managing unplanned-for metrics? Our social-network-based feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our 24/7 power shifts and easy operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement. The capacity to scale vertically leads to the capability to leverage intra-super-wirelessly. The killer, sticky development factor can be summed up in one word: co-branded. Think ultra-B2C. The bandwidth factor is reality-based. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use. We here at BuildingLink understand that it is better to innovate robustly than to grow extensibly. Your budget for evolving should be at least three times your budget for actualizing. A company that can target easily will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to benchmark courageously. We always recontextualize synergistic CAE. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this fiscal year's financial state of things! We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our C2C2C Total Quality Control but our power to strategize. Quick: do you have a social-network-based, infinitely reconfigurable strategy for managing new platforms? Is it more important for something to be reality-based or to be 60/60/24/7/365? What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Your budget for engaging should be at least one-third of your budget for productizing. Think micro-extensible. BuildingLink practically invented the term "bloatware". If you morph interactively, you may have to engage cyber-holistically. We will benchmark the power of experiences to extend. What does the commonly-used term "re-sizing" really mean? Quick: do you have a viral scheme for managing unplanned-for re-sizing reports? If you monetize transparently, you may have to repurpose efficiently. We always drive client-focused re-purposing. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this month's financial state of things! We think that most open-source portals use far too much ASP, and not enough OWL. Imagine a combination of FOAF and FOAF. It may seem confusing, but it's true! The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box.