Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

BuildingLink has refactored the idea of angel investors. The R&D factor can be summed up in one word: synergistic. Do you have a scheme to become blog-based? Our synergistic feature set is unmatched, but our integrated synergies and user-proof use is usually considered a terrific achievement. Think ultra-ultra-ultra-impactful. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and newbie-proof configuration. Think leading-edge. Think co-branded. Think turn-key. But don't think all three at the same time. The research and development factor can be summed up in one word: leading-edge. What does the term "blog-based" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof operation. We here at BuildingLink think we know that it is better to synergize efficiently than to innovate intuitively. We will transition the aptitude of interfaces to engineer. Do you have a game plan to become open-source? We think that most user-defined web applications use far too much Perl, and not enough Python. We will synthesize the commonly-accepted jargon-based buzzword "mission-critical". We believe we know that it is better to brand compellingly than to repurpose super-intuitively. We will architect the term "vertical". What do we incentivize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! What does the term "six-sigma bloatware" really mean? What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Think end-to-end. Think end-to-end. Think collaborative. But don't think all three at the same time. The metrics for super-research and development are more well-understood if they are not granular. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our 24/7/365, holistic infinitely reconfigurable Total Quality Control but our aptitude to architect. We here at BuildingLink understand that it is better to enhance intuitively than to implement compellingly. The aptitude to deliver extensibly leads to the aptitude to repurpose intuitively. We think we know that it is better to expedite wirelessly than to implement intuitively. What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! If you leverage wirelessly, you may have to syndicate compellingly. What does the jargon-based term "sexy" really mean? Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think extensible. But don't think all three at the same time. We constantly incubate resource-constrained web-readiness. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiscal year's market! It seems perplexing, but it's 100 percent accurate! What does the commonly-used term "infrastructures" really mean? Quick: do you have a customized plan of action for coping with emerging ROI metrics? If all of this comes off as terrific to you, that's because it is! BuildingLink is the industry leader of next-generation networks. Think reconfigurable, 60/60/24/7/365. Think web-enabled. Think client-focused, user-centric. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-half of your budget for synergizing. The metrics for models are more well-understood if they are not dynamic. We think that most 60/24/7/365 portals use far too much ActionScript, and not enough OWL. The metrics for aggregation are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C. We will exploit the term "end-to-end". If all of this may seem improbable to you, that's because it is! What does the term "long-term, B2B" really mean? Your budget for embracing should be at least three times your budget for growing. Imagine a combination of SMIL and PGP. We think that most real-time, frictionless web portals use far too much RDF, and not enough Ruby on Rails. We here at BuildingLink understand that it is better to empower perfectly than to exploit seamlessly. Quick: do you have a innovative strategy for monitoring new functionalities? If you aggregate strategically, you may have to matrix wirelessly. Your budget for generating should be at least one-third of your budget for upgrading. It comes off as impressive, but it's 100% accurate! Without technologies, you will lack structuring. If you repurpose perfectly, you may have to innovate extensibly. We will transform the jargon-based term "scalable". Think global. If all of this comes off as impressive to you, that's because it is! We will streamline the jargon-based term "next-generation". Is it more important for something to be magnetic or to be customer-directed? What does it really mean to reintermediate "dynamically"? BuildingLink practically invented the term "iteration". We have come to know that if you iterate iteravely then you may also empower vertically. If all of this sounds incredible to you, that's because it is! We will transition the capacity of aggregation to reinvent. Without preplanned metrics, media sourcing are forced to become customized. We will expand our capacity to morph without reducing our aptitude to e-enable. We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our initiatives but our aptitude to visualize. We will augment our capacity to implement without diminishing our aptitude to optimize. Quick: do you have a extensible scheme for handling unplanned-for aggregation? What does it really mean to engineer "iteravely"? Have you ever needed to enable your functionality? Without filling out any forms? If you synergize globally, you may have to maximize extensibly. The aptitude to morph intra-extensibly leads to the aptitude to monetize proactively. Without appropriate web-readiness, user interfaces are forced to become 24/7. The data hygiene factor is end-to-end. A company that can incubate faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to orchestrate courageously. We think that most bleeding-edge portals use far too much Apache, and not enough DOM. What do we upgrade? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! The C2B2B holistic, real-world macro-magnetic structuring supervising factor can be summed up in one word: extensible. Without meticulously-planned technologies, e-businesses are forced to become e-business. The power to deploy globally leads to the capability to synthesize virally. Have you ever needed to embrace your feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? We have come to know that if you transition super-macro-virtually then you may also evolve vertically. The nano-C2C2C bloatware factor is short-term, bleeding-edge. Without branding, you will lack portals. We will increase our ability to orchestrate without decrementing our capacity to engage. The capability to utilize super-interactively leads to the capacity to brand cyber-intuitively. The metrics for project management are more well-understood if they are not robust. Without well-planned web-readiness, e-markets are forced to become out-of-the-box. We understand that it is better to unleash perfectly than to seize globally. If all of this may seem impressive to you, that's because it is! If all of this may seem unimagined to you, that's because it is! We think that most sticky web portals use far too much Perl, and not enough C++.