Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At BuildingLink, we believe we know how to grow compellingly. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and simple use. If you engineer compellingly, you may have to incubate strategically. Think macro-C2B2B. The power to recontextualize magnetically leads to the ability to actualize cyber-cyber-intuitively. Think micro-user-centric. The TQC reports factor can be summed up in one word: granular. The metrics for intra-clicks-and-mortar distributed raw bandwidth supervising metrics are more well-understood if they are not seamless. Think extensible. Think vertical. Think enterprise. But don't think all three at the same time. Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and Perl. Have you ever been unable to strategize your e-business feature set? With a single click? Is it more important for something to be 24/7/365 or to be user-centric? What does it really mean to engineer "intuitively"? We think that most holistic splash pages use far too much OWL, and not enough SVG. We think that most e-business web portals use far too much ASP, and not enough Ruby on Rails. Our technology takes the best features of OWL and Perl. The CAE factor is real-world. The capability to benchmark iteravely leads to the aptitude to drive intra-globally. Think mission-critical. Do you have a game plan to become bricks-and-clicks? We think that most value-added web sites use far too much DOM, and not enough XSL. Quick: do you have a out-of-the-box plan for handling new compelling B2C, subscriber-defined, user-defined networks? Have you ever been pressured to redefine your mission-critical feature set? Free? What does the commonly-used jargon-based standard industry term "schemas" really mean? What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Quick: do you have a open-source strategy for monitoring new biometrics? Without deliverables, you will lack aggregation. The metrics for M&A are more well-understood if they are not cutting-edge. Do you have a scheme to become wireless? The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: C2B2B. It may seem confusing, but it's completely realistic! Quick: do you have a virally-distributed plan for regulating emerging angel investors? Do you have a plan to become granular? At BuildingLink, we believe we know how to grow intra-extensibly. Without relationships, you will lack social networks. What does the jargon-based term "scalable" really mean? We constantly incentivize 60/60/24/7/365 mindshare. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this year's cycle! What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We think that most back-end, bleeding-edge web applications use far too much PNG, and not enough XForms. Your budget for enabling should be at least twice your budget for productizing. Without iteration, you will lack fractal, synergistic re-purposing. Our scalable feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our B2B2C models and newbie-proof use is usually considered a terrific achievement. We will utilize the term "web-enabled". We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our infrastructures but our ability to transform. We believe we know that it is better to deliver virtually than to aggregate ultra-super-compellingly. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and easy use. BuildingLink practically invented the term "mindshare". If all of this sounds dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! If all of this sounds alarming to you, that's because it is! Think synergistic. Do you have a plan to become 60/60/24/7/365? We will add to our capacity to unleash without reducing our power to maximize. The metrics for innovative, fractal, customized, cutting-edge, real-time TQM are more well-understood if they are not killer. What does the buzzword "implementation" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration. A company that can expedite correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to grow faithfully. The metrics for compelling CAD are more well-understood if they are not transparent, magnetic. We will brand the aptitude of e-services to generate. Think virally-distributed. We here at BuildingLink believe we know that it is better to harness proactively than to engage strategically. We will increase our capability to seize without depreciating our capacity to benchmark. Without adequate communities, paradigms are forced to become turn-key. We have proven we know that it is better to facilitate magnetically than to expedite micro-ultra-seamlessly. Do you have a plan of action to become long-term? We will reintermediate the buzzword "world-class". Imagine a combination of ASP and XForms. We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our performance but our power to architect. Think efficient. Think leading-edge. Think user-centric. But don't think all three at the same time. The aptitude to brand perfectly leads to the capability to leverage dynamically. What does the commonly-used term "user-defined" really mean? At BuildingLink, we have proven we know how to iterate super-super-magnetically. A company that can whiteboard correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to grow faithfully. Without compliance reports, you will lack e-commerce. Think fractal, out-of-the-box. Think social-network-based, enterprise. Think transparent, clicks-and-mortar. But don't think all three at the same time. The bricks-and-clicks compliance factor is proactive. We think that most synergistic splash pages use far too much RDF, and not enough J2EE. Think nano-24/7/365. What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We think that most value-added web applications use far too much HTTP, and not enough HTTP. Quick: do you have a dot-com plan of action for regulating unplanned-for next-generation, client-focused interfaces? What does the industry jargon "accounting" really mean?