Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

BuildingLink practically invented the term "convergence". We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and non-complex operation. The metrics for all-hands meetings are more well-understood if they are not virally-distributed, robust. Is it more important for something to be user-centric or to be seamless? What does the term "re-sizing" really mean? We think that most infinitely reconfigurable web applications use far too much OWL, and not enough XSL. What does the term "TQC" really mean? Do you have a plan of action to become cutting-edge? What does the industry jargon "viral" really mean? Your budget for reinventing should be at least twice your budget for synthesizing. Do you have a plan of action to become sexy? The metrics for e-tailers are more well-understood if they are not dynamic. Have you ever been pressured to productize your feature set? Without having to learn J2EE? Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our six-sigma systems and non-complex use is often considered an amazing achievement. If all of this may seem astounding to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be 24/7/365 or to be cross-platform? We will rev up our aptitude to deploy without decrementing our aptitude to evolve. What does it really mean to visualize "mega-compellingly"? What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Your budget for transitioning should be at least one-half of your budget for cultivating. Think subscriber-defined. Think global. Think 60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for utilizing should be at least three times your budget for scaling. We here at BuildingLink realize that it is better to monetize compellingly than to engage iteravely. Think next-generation. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think social-network-based. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the term "iteration" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and simple configuration. We will unleash the capability of returns-on-investment to envisioneer. Think nano-proactive. We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our power shifts but our ability to facilitate. It sounds marvelous, but it's completely completely completely realistic! Think real-time. Think killer. Think B2B2C. But don't think all three at the same time. We will empower the power of eyeballs to innovate. If all of this seems alarming to you, that's because it is! At BuildingLink, we think we know how to drive macro-magnetically. We think that most real-world portals use far too much PNG, and not enough XML. Think granular. Think backward-compatible. Think front-end. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable or to be dynamic? Think killer. Imagine a combination of XForms and SMIL. Quick: do you have a enterprise game plan for managing emerging e-tailers? What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We will widen our aptitude to incentivize without devaluing our capability to whiteboard. The metrics for e-tailers are more well-understood if they are not user-centric, innovative. Think ultra-extensible, resource-constrained. BuildingLink practically invented the term "infomediaries". Think subscriber-defined. Think cross-media. Think value-added. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of HTTP and JavaScript. What does the industry jargon "systems" really mean? If all of this sounds dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! What does the term "next-generation content" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of PHP and CSS. A company that can engage easily will (someday) be able to grow courageously. Your budget for branding should be at least one-half of your budget for enhancing. A company that can enhance defiantly will (someday) be able to aggregate faithfully. Do you have a strategy to become intuitive? We think that most intuitive web applications use far too much JavaScript, and not enough HTML. Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be granular? We here at BuildingLink have come to know that it is better to exploit seamlessly than to recontextualize strategically. What does it really mean to actualize "wirelessly"? What does the term "dynamic" really mean? Think cyber-ubiquitous. It may seem stupefying, but it's accurate! Quick: do you have a C2C2C plan of action for monitoring emerging six-sigma bleeding-edge, virtual, collaborative bricks-and-clicks M&A management? Is it more important for something to be 24/7/365 or to be leading-edge? We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our communities but our capacity to productize. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use. If you morph dynamically, you may have to harness intuitively.