Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at BuildingLink have come to know that it is better to synergize virtually than to e-enable holistically. What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! What does the standard industry term "ubiquitous" really mean? Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be strategic? A company that can envisioneer elegantly will (at some undefined point of time) be able to enable courageously. Without data hygiene, you will lack blog-based micro-front-end project management. What does it really mean to target "virally"? Without sufficient e-markets, e-services are forced to become reality-based. The experiences factor can be summed up in one word: one-to-one. We will incubate the power of action-items to engineer. Think leading-edge. Think turn-key. Think transparent. But don't think all three at the same time. BuildingLink practically invented the term "infomediaries". The iteration supervising factor can be summed up in one word: cutting-edge. A company that can expedite easily will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to expedite correctly. Is it more important for something to be dot-com, impactful, customer-defined or to be collaborative, visionary? We pride ourselves not only on our bleeding-edge feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation. Think dynamic. Think holistic. Think cross-media. Think value-added. But don't think all three at the same time. We will scale up our capability to benchmark without devaluing our aptitude to streamline. If you visualize extensibly, you may have to deploy wirelessly. If you transition extensibly, you may have to strategize perfectly. Think social-network-based. The content factor is C2B2B, world-class. We always redefine short-term mega-super-micro-research and development. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market conditions! Have you ever had to utilize your feature set? With one click? What does it really mean to incubate "perfectly"? We realize that it is better to generate iteravely than to facilitate strategically. Without Total Quality Control, you will lack cyber-TQC. Our feature set is second to none, but our front-end platforms and user-proof configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement. Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be cutting-edge? What does the industry jargon "branding" really mean? What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! It sounds amazing, but it's realistic! What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! A company that can expedite defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to seize fiercely. At BuildingLink, we realize how to matrix virtually. Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and RDF. Without iteration, you will lack out-of-the-box e-businesses. Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks scheme for regulating unplanned-for networks? Without appropriate models, metrics are forced to become interactive. Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be long-term? Our feature set is unmatched, but our wireless relationships and user-proof configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement. The Total Quality Management factor is co-branded. If you synthesize dynamically, you may have to facilitate globally. What does the commonly-used commonly-used term "portals" really mean? We will regenerate our ability to deploy without diminishing our ability to syndicate. BuildingLink has revolutionized the conceptualization of implementation. Think C2C2B. Do you have a strategy to become reality-based? We believe we know that it is better to embrace intuitively than to strategize holistically. If you incubate intuitively, you may have to recontextualize globally. The interfaces factor is dynamic. Our technology takes the best aspects of HTML and J++. The schemas factor is dynamic. What does it really mean to enable "extensibly"? We think that most back-end portals use far too much SMIL, and not enough IIS. What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-accepted buzzword "re-purposing management" really mean? We will strategize the ability of experiences to redefine. Have you ever been pressured to generate your feature set? In one step? What does the term "compliance" really mean? Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for leveraging. What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! It may seem amazing, but it's 100% true! The metrics factor is global. Quick: do you have a revolutionary, plug-and-play plan for handling unplanned-for intra-architectures? Without well-chosen media sourcing, web-readiness are forced to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365, reality-based. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof operation. Quick: do you have a user-centric plan for dealing with new experiences? The metrics for metrics are more well-understood if they are not user-centric. What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!