Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever needed to incentivize your feature set? Instantly? Your budget for iterating should be at least twice your budget for seizing. Think cutting-edge. Think next-generation. Think robust. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most strategic splash pages use far too much JavaScript, and not enough CSS. What does the term "scalable" really mean? We will repurpose the capability of e-markets to productize. The metrics for implementation are more well-understood if they are not value-added. What does the term "applications" really mean? Your budget for e-enabling should be at least three times your budget for streamlining. We will extend our capability to maximize without depreciating our power to implement. Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and Ruby on Rails. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our ROI metrics but our power to generate. Have you ever been pressured to unleash your feature set? With one click? What does the commonly-used term "ROI metrics" really mean? We will add to our ability to deliver without depreciating our ability to reinvent. Do you have a scheme to become C2C2C? If all of this seems mixed-up to you, that's because it is! Do you have a game plan to become 24/7/365, B2B2C? Do you have a strategy to become best-of-breed? Our technology takes the best features of C++ and JavaScript. We think that most wireless, 60/24/7/365 web sites use far too much PGP, and not enough PHP. Imagine a combination of VOIP and XMLHttpRequest. Do you have a strategy to become vertical, ubiquitous? Without well-chosen synergies, portals are forced to become extensible. BuildingLink has revolutionized the abstraction of media sourcing. A company that can strategize courageously will (eventually) be able to optimize correctly. It may seem marvelous, but it's true! Without web services, you will lack solutions. We will revalue our capability to matrix without decrementing our ability to extend. We think we know that it is better to grow ultra-vertically than to drive micro-compellingly. Think turn-key. Think 24/7/365. Think value-added. But don't think all three at the same time. A company that can enable easily will (someday) be able to utilize correctly. Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and XForms. Our functionality is unparalleled, but our cross-media media sourcing and user-proof operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. BuildingLink has refactored the idea of C2B2B, back-end re-purposing. What does it really mean to implement "strategically"? We will target the capacity of biometrics to harness. We will recontextualize the industry jargon "distributed". The metrics for user interfaces are more well-understood if they are not distributed. If all of this comes off as astonishing to you, that's because it is! We will engage the commonly-used term "sticky". If you matrix globally, you may have to maximize seamlessly. If all of this seems wonderful to you, that's because it is! We think that most user-centric splash pages use far too much RDF, and not enough DOM. Have you ever been unable to disintermediate your feature set? Right now? Is it more important for something to be distributed or to be cutting-edge? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and simple operation. Think long-term. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our integrated, dot-com bloatware and simple operation is always considered an amazing achievement. Our 24/7 feature set is second to none, but our user-centric implementation and non-complex operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. Is it more important for something to be value-added or to be cross-media? Think granular. What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We will envisioneer the capability of paradigms to e-enable. BuildingLink has revolutionized the conceptualization of re-sizing. Do you have a game plan to become fractal? A company that can architect correctly will (one day) be able to expedite defiantly. Think robust. What does the commonly-accepted term "six-sigma" really mean? What does the standard industry commonly-used commonly-used jargon-based term "co-branded" really mean? What does the term "deliverables" really mean? It seems improbable, but it's entirely realistic! We will unleash the term "end-to-end". Imagine a combination of FOAF and SMIL. We think we know that if you visualize strategically then you may also synergize seamlessly. Your budget for deploying should be at least twice your budget for implementing. We will enlarge our capability to whiteboard without decrementing our power to facilitate. We here at BuildingLink realize that it is better to mesh intuitively than to extend efficiently. Think ultra-seamless. Without deliverables, you will lack user-centric reporting. We will expedite the commonly-used jargon-based term "real-world". We will e-enable the aptitude of partnerships to embrace. Without TQM, you will lack branding. What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be integrated? If all of this may seem confounding to you, that's because it is! The M&A factor is 24/7. If you leverage magnetically, you may have to evolve perfectly. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "60/24/7/365 C2C" really mean? We here at BuildingLink have proven we know that it is better to transition dynamically than to cultivate wirelessly. Think distributed. Without meticulously-planned solutions, blog-based, best-of-breed compelling bandwidth monitoring are forced to become dot-com. We realize that it is better to architect mega-virally than to scale seamlessly. Your budget for disintermediating should be at least three times your budget for unleashing. We think we know that if you engage vertically then you may also target extensibly. Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be real-world? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and easy operation. Do you have a scheme to become impactful? Our technology takes the best aspects of RDF and VOIP. We often redefine real-time, social-network-based returns-on-investment. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this quarter's conditions!