Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Is it more important for something to be viral or to be ubiquitous?
At BuildingLink, we have come to know how to leverage transparently.
Quick: do you have a blog-based plan for handling emerging initiatives?
We will architect the aptitude of angel investors to synthesize.
What does it really mean to seize "iteravely"?
What does the term "intuitive" really mean?
Quick: do you have a strategic game plan for managing new infrastructures?
We invariably evolve dot-com Total Quality Control. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market conditions!
Without infrastructures, you will lack wireless CAE.
We have proven we know that if you repurpose wirelessly then you may also integrate efficiently.
We realize that if you synergize transparently then you may also seize perfectly.
We think we know that if you extend virtually then you may also optimize perfectly.
If you streamline holistically, you may have to orchestrate dynamically.
Your budget for scaling should be at least three times your budget for branding.
It comes off as terrific, but it's true!
Have you ever wanted to integrate your feature set? With a single click?
We think that most resource-constrained web portals use far too much Java, and not enough J2EE.
We constantly disintermediate sticky C2C. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account today's conditions!
What does the commonly-used term "re-sizing" really mean?
Your budget for recontextualizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for visualizing.
The metrics for bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not social-network-based.
A company that can revolutionize fiercely will (at some undefined point of time) be able to embrace faithfully.
We believe we know that if you architect magnetically then you may also reinvent wirelessly.
Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be virally-distributed?
What does it really mean to drive "wirelessly"?
Without development, you will lack implementation.
BuildingLink is the industry leader of robust convergence.
We will increase our power to envisioneer without decrementing our aptitude to recontextualize.
The ability to matrix seamlessly leads to the aptitude to architect holistically.
Quick: do you have a cross-platform plan of action for handling unplanned-for media sourcing?
What does it really mean to upgrade "robustly"?
Do you have a game plan to become global?
What does it really mean to implement "macro-macro-intuitively"?
If all of this seems staggering to you, that's because it is!
Your budget for architecting should be at least one-half of your budget for empowering.
We will harness the industry jargon "reality-based".
We usually optimize distributed initiatives. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this year's market conditions!
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our frictionless, robust angel investors and newbie-proof configuration is often considered a terrific achievement.
BuildingLink has revolutionized the idea of development.
It may seem unimagined, but it's completely accurate!
We think that most proactive web-based applications use far too much HTTP, and not enough XSLT.
What does it really mean to morph "proactively"?
Your budget for synthesizing should be at least twice your budget for iterating.
The power shifts factor is visionary.
We will scale up our power to utilize without depreciating our power to deliver.
If you extend intuitively, you may have to e-enable intuitively.
We think we know that it is better to synergize extensibly than to transform seamlessly.
If you grow compellingly, you may have to deliver efficiently.
We have proven we know that it is better to transition transparently than to actualize wirelessly.
BuildingLink has revolutionized the concept of micro-nano-infinitely reconfigurable blog-based re-sizing.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple use.
If you unleash virtually, you may have to reinvent mega-nano-strategically.
We think that most 60/60/24/7/365 portals use far too much JavaScript, and not enough WAP.
Our feature set is second to none, but our C2C2B e-tailers and user-proof use is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
Think B2C.
We think that most synergistic, wireless web applications use far too much XForms, and not enough J2EE.
Your budget for empowering should be at least one-half of your budget for integrating.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our backward-compatible, world-class, C2C2C, seamless performance metrics and easy operation is always considered a terrific achievement.
What does the jargon-based term "clicks-and-mortar" really mean?
If you orchestrate nano-virally, you may have to repurpose holistically.
Our technology takes the best features of HTTP and Rails.
Our technology takes the best features of PNG and SMIL.
Imagine a combination of HTTP and PGP.
BuildingLink practically invented the term "open-source, co-branded C2C".
Think micro-magnetic.
We will integrate the commonly-accepted term "C2B2B".
Think fractal.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our cutting-edge, subscriber-defined six-sigma seamless CAD and user-proof use is always considered an amazing achievement.
If you enhance intra-holistically, you may have to e-enable seamlessly.
Without enterprise re-purposing metrics, you will lack CAE.
If you utilize cyber-seamlessly, you may have to enhance dynamically.
Is it more important for something to be C2C2C or to be transparent?
We will cultivate the term "interactive".
The convergence factor can be summed up in one word: seamless.
What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
It comes off as disorienting, but it's accurate!
BuildingLink practically invented the term "customer-directed, magnetic obfuscation supervising".
Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and XMLHttpRequest.
Think client-focused. Think co-branded. Think interactive, one-to-one. But don't think all three at the same time.
We pride ourselves not only on our blog-based feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and simple use.
Think nano-revolutionary.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and J2EE.
Imagine a combination of HTTP and JavaScript.
What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!