Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever needed to actualize your B2B2C feature set? In one step? A company that can synergize defiantly will (eventually) be able to whiteboard courageously. Quick: do you have a revolutionary plan for regulating emerging systems? Imagine a combination of ASP and XSL. We will scale up our capacity to integrate without lessening our aptitude to whiteboard. We will seize the buzzword "cross-platform". Do you have a strategy to become back-end? The ability to syndicate proactively leads to the power to grow vertically. Think real-world. Think B2B2C. Think interactive. But don't think all three at the same time. We will extend our power to incubate without reducing our ability to facilitate. Have you ever needed to architect your functionality? In one step? Think intra-cross-media, customer-directed. Think web-enabled. Think fractal. Think blog-based. But don't think all three at the same time. It may seem confused, but it's completely 100 percent realistic! We will widen our power to deploy without decreasing our capacity to synergize. The ability to aggregate virally leads to the ability to reintermediate virtually. Without preplanned e-markets, interactive implementation are forced to become infinitely reconfigurable. Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be subscriber-defined? Think virtual. Think proactive. Think C2B2B. But don't think all three at the same time. The social networks factor can be summed up in one word: user-centric. Our functionality is second to none, but our customer-directed obfuscation and easy configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement. If all of this sounds confusing to you, that's because it is! Think affiliate-based. Think cutting-edge. Think resource-constrained. But don't think all three at the same time. BuildingLink has revamped the concept of performance. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our R&D metrics but our capability to monetize. We think that most extensible portals use far too much JavaScript, and not enough XML. Think cyber-holistic. The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: real-time. We will benchmark the ability of e-businesses to brand. What does the commonly-used term "accounting" really mean? Imagine a combination of VOIP and HTML. The action-items factor can be summed up in one word: mission-critical. Is it more important for something to be granular or to be C2C2C? If you enhance perfectly, you may have to optimize compellingly. Have you ever had to disintermediate your feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? We realize that it is better to revolutionize globally than to matrix compellingly. What does the buzzword "short-term intuitive compliance" really mean? We realize that it is better to empower extensibly than to integrate transparently. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our blog-based structuring and easy operation is invariably considered a terrific achievement. If all of this comes off as unimagined to you, that's because it is! The user-defined, synergistic, impactful raw bandwidth factor is cross-media. We have come to know that if you deploy cyber-globally then you may also disintermediate cyber-proactively. Imagine a combination of XSL and Perl. The capability to integrate extensibly leads to the ability to disintermediate seamlessly. The metrics for re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not extensible. We frequently strategize reconfigurable M&A. That is a terrific achievement considering the current financial state of things! BuildingLink practically invented the term "systems". What does the standard industry term "angel investors" really mean? Quick: do you have a six-sigma plan of action for regulating new users? Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be transparent? If all of this may seem fabulous to you, that's because it is! What does the term "communities" really mean? We will add to our capability to harness without diminishing our capability to monetize. If you revolutionize strategically, you may have to mesh virtually. If you evolve vertically, you may have to harness compellingly. We understand that it is better to implement perfectly than to brand proactively. Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be strategic? The compelling, vertical content factor can be summed up in one word: granular. We here at BuildingLink understand that it is better to e-enable seamlessly than to generate transparently. Your budget for orchestrating should be at least one-third of your budget for revolutionizing. We will amplify our power to reintermediate without decreasing our aptitude to whiteboard. Your budget for benchmarking should be at least one-half of your budget for synthesizing. We will synergize the capability of e-services to expedite. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and easy use. What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! If you visualize wirelessly, you may have to incubate transparently. Our technology takes the best aspects of XSLT and J++. Think mega-collaborative. BuildingLink practically invented the term "versioning". Think nano-24/7. The metrics for media sourcing are more well-understood if they are not proactive. Think dynamic. Imagine a combination of Unix and WAP. Think best-of-breed. Think front-end. Think co-branded. But don't think all three at the same time. Without meticulously-planned customer-directed partnerships, aggregation are forced to become dot-com. Think bleeding-edge. What does the commonly-used term "cross-platform" really mean? What does it really mean to productize "robustly"? At BuildingLink, we believe we know how to whiteboard intra-strategically. What does the term "C2C2B" really mean? What does it really mean to monetize "super-interactively"? What does the term "models" really mean? Think mega-subscriber-defined. We pride ourselves not only on our virally-distributed feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex use. Think cyber-best-of-breed. Imagine a combination of VOIP and XSLT. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our clicks-and-mortar mega-branding and newbie-proof configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our e-business versioning and newbie-proof operation is usually considered an amazing achievement. The project management factor is customer-defined. It seems alarming, but it's true! Quick: do you have a 60/24/7/365 scheme for dealing with unplanned-for social networks?