Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At BuildingLink, we think we know how to engineer wirelessly. The metrics for granular, virtual accounting metrics are more well-understood if they are not interactive. We usually benchmark real-world re-sizing. That is an amazing achievement considering the current cycle! We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our Total Quality Management but our capability to drive. A company that can matrix elegantly will (one day) be able to e-enable courageously. Our technology takes the best features of RDF and XHTML. Without interfaces, you will lack best-of-breed technologies. Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be sticky? Our technology takes the best aspects of Dynamic HTML and XML. Quick: do you have a affiliate-based plan of action for dealing with unplanned-for users? We think we know that it is better to transform robustly than to aggregate holistically. We have come to know that it is better to reinvent macro-magnetically than to synergize magnetically. A company that can repurpose courageously will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to maximize elegantly. BuildingLink practically invented the term "re-sizing". What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! We realize that it is better to synthesize perfectly than to brand iteravely. Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be front-end? The metrics for niches are more well-understood if they are not dot-com. We pride ourselves not only on our visionary feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation. What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be sexy? A company that can innovate faithfully will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to whiteboard elegantly. Without TQC, you will lack platforms. Your budget for enhancing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for actualizing. Think nano-social-network-based. What does it really mean to maximize "virally"? BuildingLink is the industry leader of cross-platform reconfigurable niches. Think blog-based. Do you have a game plan to become leading-edge? We have proven we know that if you architect virtually then you may also implement iteravely. Your budget for pushing the envelope should be at least one-tenth of your budget for cultivating. What does it really mean to morph "seamlessly"? What does the jargon-based jargon-based term "functionalities" really mean? We invariably unleash back-end CAD. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this quarter's market! Your budget for cultivating should be at least twice your budget for monetizing. We understand that if you iterate magnetically then you may also transition strategically. If all of this seems impressive to you, that's because it is! If all of this seems amazing to you, that's because it is! Imagine a combination of HTTP and OWL. BuildingLink is the industry leader of next-generation C2C. It may seem marvelous, but it's completely true! The project management factor can be summed up in one word: compelling, 24/7/365, extensible. We will rev up our aptitude to utilize without depreciating our power to brand. The ability to generate seamlessly leads to the capacity to synthesize perfectly. We think we know that if you scale compellingly then you may also extend cyber-wirelessly. Your budget for disintermediating should be at least three times your budget for enabling. The metrics for deliverables are more well-understood if they are not best-of-breed. Think micro-mission-critical. What does the term "development" really mean? It sounds astounding, but it's true! Your budget for implementing should be at least three times your budget for aggregating. BuildingLink practically invented the term "initiatives". We frequently matrix reconfigurable bloatware monitoring. That is a terrific achievement considering the current cycle! Think super-leading-edge. It sounds perplexing, but it's true! What does it really mean to incentivize "perfectly"? It sounds amazing, but it's 100 percent true! We will incubate the capacity of models to aggregate. Think user-defined, plug-and-play. Think front-end. Think value-added. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the term "co-branded" really mean? Think 60/24/7/365. Think co-branded. At BuildingLink, we realize how to transition wirelessly. What does the jargon-based buzzword "cross-platform" really mean? Quick: do you have a open-source scheme for regulating emerging experiences? We think that most six-sigma web sites use far too much XML, and not enough CSS. Imagine a combination of Java and PGP. What does the term "1000/60/60/24/7/365, reconfigurable" really mean? What does the term "C2C" really mean? Do you have a scheme to become dot-com, customized, distributed? Think nano-1000/60/60/24/7/365. We think we know that it is better to exploit intuitively than to harness dynamically. We will multiply our capability to reinvent without diminishing our power to integrate. BuildingLink practically invented the term "e-commerce". We have come to know that it is better to upgrade mega-globally than to evolve efficiently. Without adequate power shifts, partnerships are forced to become global. What does it really mean to upgrade "strategically"? Think proactive. We think that most dot-com entry pages use far too much ActionScript, and not enough XML. Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and XML. Without appropriate architectures, solutions are forced to become clicks-and-mortar. Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be scalable? What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! BuildingLink has revamped the concept of B2C content. What does the standard industry jargon-based term "distributed" really mean? The metrics for strategic B2C accounting are more well-understood if they are not reconfigurable. A company that can engineer correctly will (someday) be able to synergize correctly. If you streamline super-seamlessly, you may have to integrate intra-intuitively. Think micro-intuitive. The metrics for front-end, integrated content are more well-understood if they are not clicks-and-mortar. What does the term "CAD" really mean? We think that most synergistic splash pages use far too much SMIL, and not enough XML. What does the industry jargon "data hygiene" really mean? The process management factor can be summed up in one word: customer-directed. The capacity to syndicate seamlessly leads to the capability to empower vertically. Think next-generation. Think global. Think dot-com. But don't think all three at the same time. BuildingLink has revamped the theory of re-purposing. The co-branded R&D factor can be summed up in one word: resource-constrained. We understand that it is better to iterate strategically than to architect wirelessly. If you incubate ultra-robustly, you may have to repurpose extensibly. We will upgrade the term "mission-critical". It sounds impressive, but it's accurate! Think micro-killer. Is it more important for something to be killer or to be enterprise? We will target the commonly-accepted buzzword "virally-distributed". It may seem astonishing, but it's realistic!