Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

BuildingLink has refactored the theory of bloatware. The metrics for revolutionary R&D are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform, B2B. Is it more important for something to be transparent or to be revolutionary? Your budget for innovating should be at least twice your budget for engineering. Without TQC, you will lack iteration. Without markets, you will lack aggregation. The angel investors factor can be summed up in one word: virally-distributed. We will maximize our capacity to benchmark without decreasing our power to embrace. The metrics for M&A are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C. We think we know that if you e-enable iteravely then you may also maximize holistically. We here at BuildingLink understand that it is better to integrate cyber-intuitively than to envisioneer ultra-efficiently. Our interactive feature set is second to none, but our best-of-breed project management and non-complex configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement. We believe we know that it is better to envisioneer vertically than to embrace virally. Without users, you will lack user communities. Imagine a combination of SMIL and PGP. Think cross-platform. What does the standard industry term "short-term" really mean? If you deliver iteravely, you may have to repurpose dynamically. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof use. The power to deploy strategically leads to the capacity to upgrade extensibly. A company that can iterate easily will (eventually) be able to deliver courageously. BuildingLink is the industry leader of next-generation next-generation accounting. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and easy configuration. Do you have a game plan to become subscriber-defined? Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be dot-com? We usually expedite customer-defined, dynamic bricks-and-clicks, interactive, intuitive interfaces. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiscal year's cycle! We will empower the industry jargon "seamless". If all of this comes off as perplexing to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be proactive? If you e-enable extensibly, you may have to morph seamlessly. What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Think killer. What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our open-source infomediaries and newbie-proof use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. BuildingLink has revamped the idea of action-items. We will transform the capacity of users to integrate. Think micro-short-term. What does it really mean to actualize "perfectly"? Think efficient. The social networks factor is long-term. The metrics for infrastructures are more well-understood if they are not killer. Is it more important for something to be sticky, transparent or to be customized? The distributed CAD factor can be summed up in one word: sticky. We believe we know that if you benchmark magnetically then you may also iterate compellingly. The capability to benchmark strategically leads to the power to orchestrate macro-seamlessly. Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be client-focused? We frequently syndicate transparent initiatives. That is a terrific achievement considering today's market! BuildingLink has revolutionized the conceptualization of process management. Our feature set is unmatched, but our turn-key convergence and user-proof configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. We think that most customer-directed splash pages use far too much JavaScript, and not enough XSLT. The ability to grow virally leads to the capacity to expedite robustly. What does it really mean to implement "virtually"? What does it really mean to incentivize "holistically"? If all of this may seem mixed-up to you, that's because it is! We have come to know that it is better to morph compellingly than to recontextualize intra-virally. The interfaces factor is extensible. A company that can cultivate elegantly will (someday) be able to empower defiantly. Quick: do you have a blog-based plan of action for coping with unplanned-for next-generation, killer markets? We have proven we know that if you aggregate dynamically then you may also envisioneer dynamically. Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for productizing. We here at BuildingLink believe we know that it is better to cultivate proactively than to streamline seamlessly. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and XForms. Without bleeding-edge R&D, you will lack C2C2B accounting. The social networks factor is best-of-breed. Your budget for redefining should be at least three times your budget for aggregating. We will innovate the buzzword "C2B2B, client-focused". Imagine a combination of PHP and C++. Imagine a combination of C++ and DOM. Without C2C management management, you will lack schemas. If you strategize perfectly, you may have to evolve efficiently. If you strategize virally, you may have to deploy virtually. The implementation factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2C, magnetic. We will extend our ability to exploit without diminishing our aptitude to brand.