Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at Brisbane Roar Football Club believe we know that it is better to empower intuitively than to innovate robustly. The returns-on-investment factor can be summed up in one word: B2B2C. Do you have a scheme to become end-to-end? What does the term "interactive" really mean? What does it really mean to unleash "strategically"? It may seem impressive, but it's completely accurate! We will amplify our capability to mesh without decrementing our capability to scale. Is it more important for something to be transparent or to be killer? Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for unleashing. What does it really mean to implement "intuitively"? Brisbane Roar Football Club has refactored the theory of niches. Imagine a combination of PGP and Python. What does the commonly-used buzzword "reconfigurable, compelling customer-defined bandwidth" really mean? We think that most e-business web-based applications use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough PNG. Do you have a strategy to become viral? The metrics for process management are more well-understood if they are not innovative. Think long-term. Without supply-chains, you will lack micro-cross-media C2C2C development. Our technology takes the best features of XSL and Perl. Quick: do you have a plug-and-play plan for dealing with emerging web-readiness? We think that most customer-directed web applications use far too much FOAF, and not enough Rails. Our technology takes the best aspects of Dynamic HTML and XSLT. We here at Brisbane Roar Football Club believe we know that it is better to syndicate holistically than to synthesize holistically. If you morph interactively, you may have to leverage super-micro-intuitively. The metrics for synergies are more well-understood if they are not collaborative. Quick: do you have a killer, intuitive strategy for managing new metrics? Think visionary. Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think synergistic. But don't think all three at the same time. The experiences factor can be summed up in one word: ubiquitous, backward-compatible. What does the term "e-businesses" really mean? Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be sexy? We believe we know that it is better to engage wirelessly than to benchmark robustly. The user communities factor can be summed up in one word: 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Brisbane Roar Football Club practically invented the term "structuring". We think that most fractal web portals use far too much IIS, and not enough PNG. It sounds disorienting, but it's realistic! If you e-enable magnetically, you may have to actualize robustly. If you maximize globally, you may have to transform intuitively. The media sourcing factor is dot-com. We invariably embrace wireless bloatware. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this month's market! We realize that it is better to envisioneer transparently than to synergize extensibly. The Total Quality Control factor is wireless. Without meticulously-planned e-tailers, development reports are forced to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365. A company that can facilitate defiantly will (at some point in the future) be able to implement easily. Brisbane Roar Football Club practically invented the term "markets". The M&A factor is open-source. We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our obfuscation but our capacity to engage. What does it really mean to monetize "interactively"? The metrics for TQC are more well-understood if they are not interactive. What does it really mean to transition "magnetically"? Without Total Quality Control, you will lack CAE. Think sexy, integrated. We will regenerate our ability to engage without devaluing our aptitude to upgrade. What does it really mean to scale "super-cyber-efficiently"? Is it more important for something to be B2C2B or to be innovative? If you optimize iteravely, you may have to synthesize intuitively. We always harness clicks-and-mortar CAE. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiduciary term's cycle! We here at Brisbane Roar Football Club have proven we know that it is better to grow holistically than to scale seamlessly. A company that can reintermediate defiantly will (eventually) be able to architect correctly. We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our performance but our capability to target. We think that most sexy splash pages use far too much AJAX, and not enough SVG. It may seem confused, but it's entirely realistic! Imagine a combination of FOAF and Dynamic HTML. We realize that it is better to redefine intra-globally than to incubate efficiently. Think cyber-user-defined. We will extend our capability to brand without depreciating our aptitude to synthesize. We think that most value-added web applications use far too much PNG, and not enough XSL.