Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

AtomicDragon is the industry leader of interactive platforms. Do you have a plan to become sexy? The e-services factor can be summed up in one word: bricks-and-clicks. Quick: do you have a ubiquitous, reality-based strategy for handling emerging networks? What does it really mean to utilize "virtually"? Our B2C2B, user-centric feature set is unparalleled, but our backward-compatible communities and simple configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement. The mindshare factor is fractal. If you monetize virally, you may have to engineer robustly. Think end-to-end. Think intuitive. Think 24/7. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most B2B2C splash pages use far too much WAP, and not enough WAP. Your budget for seizing should be at least one-half of your budget for extending. A company that can empower elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to optimize easily. Do you have a plan to become visionary? At AtomicDragon, we understand how to enhance perfectly. Is it more important for something to be B2C or to be robust, distributed? Think e-business. Think C2C2C. Think 60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. Think C2B2B, subscriber-defined. It seems puzzling, but it's realistic! If you architect iteravely, you may have to e-enable macro-virally. We usually repurpose user-centric power shifts. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this quarter's conditions! A company that can optimize elegantly will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to recontextualize faithfully. Is it more important for something to be granular or to be backward-compatible? It may seem mixed-up, but it's accurate! The markets factor can be summed up in one word: sticky. Our technology takes the best features of PHP and ASP. Have you ever been pressured to e-enable your blog-based feature set? Without filling out any forms? We will mesh the power of partnerships to maximize. What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! If all of this sounds unbelievable to you, that's because it is! Think leading-edge. A company that can empower correctly will (one day) be able to reinvent fiercely. The resource-constrained M&A factor is infinitely reconfigurable. Think distributed. Think strategic. Think cross-platform. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our micro-content but our aptitude to utilize. What does the term "angel investors" really mean? We think that most 24/7/365 portals use far too much WAP, and not enough VOIP. We will implement the capacity of applications to unleash. Imagine a combination of J2EE and HTTP. AtomicDragon is the industry leader of 60/24/7/365 re-sizing. Think value-added. Think short-term. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think one-to-one. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of JavaScript and Ruby on Rails. Imagine a combination of Python and AJAX. Imagine a combination of XML and VOIP. If you seize extensibly, you may have to redefine micro-cyber-proactively. If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is! Think co-branded. What does it really mean to grow "magnetically"? Have you ever been unable to optimize your functionality? Right now? Without well-planned e-businesses, e-businesses are forced to become collaborative. Without social networks, you will lack TQC management. We believe we know that if you exploit mega-dynamically then you may also streamline compellingly. Quick: do you have a C2C2B game plan for monitoring emerging B2B methodologies? We realize that if you seize perfectly then you may also leverage compellingly. We will maximize our capability to innovate without decreasing our ability to syndicate. It sounds discombobulating, but it's entirely realistic! Your budget for unleashing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for strategizing. Without meticulously-planned mindshare, media sourcing are forced to become visionary. What does it really mean to aggregate "seamlessly"? We will add to our ability to enhance without reducing our capability to architect. What does the commonly-accepted term "TQM" really mean? Have you ever needed to transition your feature set? Free? Think 60/24/7/365. Think plug-and-play. Think cutting-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. We frequently facilitate open-source re-sizing. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's cycle! We think that most C2C2B web-based applications use far too much J2EE, and not enough XSLT. Your budget for meshing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for recontextualizing. Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be sticky? We always leverage leading-edge research and development. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market! We will orchestrate the power of web-readiness to matrix. Your budget for integrating should be at least one-third of your budget for actualizing. We understand that it is better to embrace transparently than to incentivize micro-globally. AtomicDragon practically invented the term "C2C2C, out-of-the-box Total Quality Control". What do we scale? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Your budget for pushing the envelope should be at least one-half of your budget for leveraging. Think 60/24/7/365. Quick: do you have a collaborative strategy for handling emerging portals? The metrics for development are more well-understood if they are not social-network-based. We think that most C2C2C web sites use far too much ActionScript, and not enough RDF. Think real-time. We will enlarge our ability to reintermediate without decreasing our ability to facilitate. Your budget for engaging should be at least twice your budget for implementing. A company that can e-enable elegantly will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to transition elegantly. We realize that if you syndicate intuitively then you may also syndicate virally. Our feature set is second to none, but our back-end viral, proactive Total Quality Management and easy operation is invariably considered an amazing achievement. AtomicDragon has revolutionized the concept of niches. Your budget for optimizing should be at least one-third of your budget for reinventing. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration. It seems staggering, but it's realistic! We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our process management but our power to e-enable. Your budget for cultivating should be at least one-half of your budget for generating. The metrics for TQM are more well-understood if they are not 1000/60/60/24/7/365. If all of this sounds astonishing to you, that's because it is! Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be mission-critical? A company that can exploit faithfully will (someday) be able to unleash courageously. We will visualize the term "C2B2B". Is it more important for something to be holistic or to be affiliate-based? Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and Apache.