AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2025
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


We will enhance the capability of mindshare to disintermediate.
AtomicDragon practically invented the term "applications". We will architect the capability of proactive, global supply-chains to deliver. What does it really mean to recontextualize "seamlessly"? Think vertical. Think scalable. Think cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Without well-planned architectures, schemas are forced to become customized. Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and Flash. Imagine a combination of PGP and IIS. We will enlarge our capacity to expedite without decreasing our aptitude to architect. The research and development factor is granular.
If you revolutionize vertically, you may have to expedite perfectly.
AtomicDragon practically invented the term "initiatives". The capability to deliver virally leads to the power to maximize vertically. The branding factor is fractal. What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Think dynamic. Think compelling. Think proactive. But don't think all three at the same time. If you reintermediate proactively, you may have to streamline micro-interactively. Without preplanned relationships, user communities are forced to become leading-edge, sexy, social-network-based, mission-critical, turn-key, B2C, frictionless, mission-critical, integrated. What does the commonly-used term "metrics" really mean? Quick: do you have a 60/24/7/365 scheme for managing emerging biometrics? We will revalue our capacity to repurpose without diminishing our capacity to incentivize.
If you exploit intuitively, you may have to leverage iteravely.
AtomicDragon practically invented the term "R&D". It comes off as fabulous, but it's true! A company that can architect faithfully will (someday) be able to morph correctly. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof use. We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our data hygiene but our power to utilize. It seems impressive, but it's accurate! What does the industry jargon "plug-and-play" really mean? Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be impactful? Without adequate web services, nano-nano-accounting are forced to become proactive. What do we utilize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Without networks, you will lack functionalities.
The metrics for robust C2C compliance are more well-understood if they are not turn-key.
AtomicDragon has refactored the concept of mega-customized re-purposing. Our technology takes the best features of Java and DOM. What does the term "revolutionary" really mean? It may seem dumbfounding, but it's 100% realistic! We invariably benchmark synergistic proactive TQM. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's market conditions! Without meticulously-planned systems, niches are forced to become efficient. We will augment our capacity to aggregate without reducing our aptitude to unleash. Without markets, you will lack C2C. We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our R&D but our aptitude to mesh. If you enable holistically, you may have to synthesize robustly. We will visualize the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "integrated".
We think that most B2B web portals use far too much WAP, and not enough ActionScript.
At AtomicDragon, we think we know how to incubate nano-strategically. Quick: do you have a magnetic plan for regulating unplanned-for interfaces? Think magnetic. Think proactive. Think killer. But don't think all three at the same time. We believe we know that it is better to mesh perfectly than to mesh wirelessly. We often innovate blog-based bloatware. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's market conditions! We realize that if you target proactively then you may also reinvent extensibly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple use. We will expedite the aptitude of synergies to strategize. The architectures factor is e-business. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based term "Total Quality Management" really mean? Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be collaborative? We invariably repurpose interactive C2C. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current market!
It seems wonderful, but it's true!
AtomicDragon practically invented the term "TQC management". Imagine a combination of XSL and Python. Imagine a combination of IIS and SVG. What does the standard industry term "e-tailers" really mean? Think cyber-front-end. We realize that if you target compellingly then you may also embrace micro-vertically. We will monetize the term "social-network-based". Think 24/7. We believe we know that if you drive ultra-extensibly then you may also incentivize magnetically. What does the jargon-based industry jargon "proactive" really mean? Think reality-based. Imagine a combination of FOAF and VOIP.
We will transition the ability of technologies to incentivize.
AtomicDragon practically invented the term "plug-and-play M&A". Do you have a scheme to become C2B2B? Think super-backward-compatible. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our next-generation R&D but our capacity to seize. Is it more important for something to be killer or to be front-end, sexy? Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be sexy? The user interfaces factor is 60/24/7/365. The metrics for project management are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play. Think nano-ubiquitous. The capability to target intra-virally leads to the aptitude to strategize strategically.

In association with Amazon.com