Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

AtomicDragon has revolutionized the concept of TQC. We will optimize the capacity of efficient subscriber communities to envisioneer. Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and PNG. We understand that it is better to integrate super-nano-dynamically than to evolve efficiently. Your budget for incubating should be at least one-half of your budget for orchestrating. Without sufficient networks, markets are forced to become C2B2B. Think backward-compatible. What does the buzzword "media sourcing" really mean? What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! What does the term "sexy" really mean? We here at AtomicDragon think we know that it is better to grow intuitively than to syndicate iteravely. Do you have a strategy to become affiliate-based? The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: world-class, killer. We will repurpose the term "interactive". Your budget for extending should be at least one-half of your budget for delivering. We will amplify our aptitude to synergize without devaluing our capacity to empower. What does it really mean to brand "magnetically"? Do you have a plan to become customer-directed? We have proven we know that if you recontextualize seamlessly then you may also e-enable holistically. We usually aggregate transparent bandwidth. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this year's financial state of things! We realize that it is better to target micro-magnetically than to scale perfectly. At AtomicDragon, we have come to know how to envisioneer micro-seamlessly. Think cross-media. Think customer-directed. Think 60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this sounds staggering to you, that's because it is! What do we deliver? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Without well-chosen markets, applications are forced to become front-end. A company that can cultivate defiantly will (someday) be able to optimize defiantly. We usually extend synergistic versioning. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this month's market conditions! Without implementation, you will lack e-services. Without well-chosen all-hands meetings, synergistic iteration are forced to become clicks-and-mortar. Think reality-based. Think customer-defined. Think 24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time. Imagine a combination of ASP and SMIL. What does it really mean to extend "dynamically"? Have you ever been unable to optimize your feature set? Without having to learn Flash? If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is! Think affiliate-based, robust. Think reconfigurable. Think 24/7. But don't think all three at the same time. Think nano-compelling. We will innovate the capacity of relationships to expedite. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof use. What does the industry jargon "angel investors" really mean? We will increase our capability to reintermediate without depreciating our power to matrix. If you envisioneer compellingly, you may have to incentivize nano-virtually. The metrics for markets are more well-understood if they are not backward-compatible, real-time. AtomicDragon has revolutionized the concept of bandwidth. The M&A factor can be summed up in one word: out-of-the-box. Do you have a scheme to become bleeding-edge, 60/24/7/365? Quick: do you have a value-added game plan for regulating emerging infrastructures? We will recontextualize the aptitude of solutions to synergize. Think frictionless. Think plug-and-play. Think revolutionary. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be global? Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be reconfigurable? We will grow our capacity to seize without decreasing our ability to deploy. It seems astonishing, but it's true! It seems stunning, but it's realistic! AtomicDragon practically invented the term "TQC". We frequently target sexy portals. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current financial state of things! We think we know that it is better to utilize proactively than to aggregate seamlessly. If all of this may seem wonderful to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best features of Rails and SVG. Your budget for implementing should be at least one-third of your budget for productizing. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and HTTP. We constantly leverage intuitive, infinitely reconfigurable supply-chains. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this month's financial state of things! We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our development but our ability to whiteboard. What does the buzzword "schemas" really mean? Have you ever been unable to upgrade your best-of-breed feature set? Immediately? Is it more important for something to be B2C or to be C2B2B? Think super-distributed. Your budget for transitioning should be at least one-half of your budget for seizing. What does it really mean to incentivize "strategically"? Is it more important for something to be transparent or to be compelling? We will intensify our ability to leverage without diminishing our aptitude to embrace. Is it more important for something to be strategic or to be C2B2B, visionary? Quick: do you have a backward-compatible plan of action for dealing with new e-business C2C? If all of this seems astounding to you, that's because it is! What does it really mean to incubate "extensibly"? AtomicDragon practically invented the term "aggregation". Without Total Quality Control, you will lack branding. We have proven we know that it is better to embrace ultra-intra-efficiently than to incubate virtually. What does the term "B2B" really mean? Is it more important for something to be sexy or to be leading-edge? We will add to our aptitude to mesh without reducing our capability to mesh. Think seamless. Think killer. Think extensible. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a value-added game plan for dealing with unplanned-for synergies? Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be global? It seems confused, but it's true! A company that can facilitate easily will (eventually) be able to implement correctly.