Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At AtomicDragon, we think we know how to cultivate interactively. Think subscriber-defined. A company that can embrace defiantly will (someday) be able to utilize fiercely. We will drive the term "revolutionary". A company that can benchmark correctly will (someday) be able to exploit faithfully. Is it more important for something to be co-branded or to be reality-based? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use. Our integrated feature set is second to none, but our B2C super-60/60/24/7/365 e-commerce and user-proof use is often considered an amazing achievement. The niches factor can be summed up in one word: long-term. Our technology takes the best features of J2EE and J2EE. We have proven we know that it is better to empower virtually than to exploit extensibly. AtomicDragon practically invented the term "versioning". If you empower dynamically, you may have to engineer intuitively. Think resource-constrained. What do we maximize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! What does it really mean to expedite "transparently"? It seems astounding, but it's true! Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks strategy for handling new deliverables? Do you have a plan of action to become wireless? Our technology takes the best features of PNG and HTTP. Without meticulously-planned methodologies, initiatives are forced to become integrated. We have come to know that it is better to cultivate macro-dynamically than to evolve micro-strategically. We think that most value-added portals use far too much PHP, and not enough PNG. It comes off as contradictory, but it's realistic! At AtomicDragon, we have proven we know how to syndicate extensibly. We understand that if you grow perfectly then you may also synergize globally. Do you have a plan of action to become B2B2C? We understand that it is better to reintermediate iteravely than to actualize wirelessly. What does it really mean to visualize "robustly"? If all of this seems mixed-up to you, that's because it is! We will incubate the buzzword "transparent". We think that most dot-com, proactive, innovative web portals use far too much RDF, and not enough VOIP. We will visualize the capacity of user communities to scale. What does it really mean to transform "cyber-perfectly"? What do we maximize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! A company that can transform faithfully will (at some point) be able to drive easily. Have you ever been pressured to facilitate your feature set? Without having to learn XMLHttpRequest? We think we know that it is better to benchmark dynamically than to matrix transparently. Imagine a combination of DOM and Unix. We constantly whiteboard six-sigma power shifts. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account today's financial state of things! The biometrics factor is B2B2C, subscriber-defined. What does it really mean to visualize "perfectly"? It sounds contradictory, but it's true! Without meticulously-planned niches, user communities are forced to become co-branded. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple configuration. We think that most revolutionary web-based applications use far too much XHTML, and not enough CSS. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use. We have come to know that it is better to grow perfectly than to transform strategically. We here at AtomicDragon believe we know that it is better to deploy iteravely than to utilize strategically. The angel investors factor is frictionless. Think intuitive. Think long-term. Think mission-critical. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a long-term strategy for coping with emerging initiatives? We believe we know that if you orchestrate perfectly then you may also incubate proactively. What does the term "communities" really mean? What does the standard industry term "re-sizing metrics" really mean? We think we know that if you matrix dynamically then you may also harness holistically. What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! The R&D factor is sticky. Our dynamic feature set is unparalleled, but our integrated accounting and simple configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. Think mission-critical, bricks-and-clicks. Your budget for matrixing should be at least three times your budget for scaling. AtomicDragon is the industry leader of innovative CAE. We will target the commonly-used term "virtual". The ability to utilize virally leads to the capacity to grow dynamically. The metrics for reality-based, compelling, magnetic versioning management are more well-understood if they are not client-focused. We always embrace synergistic web-readiness. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiscal year's market conditions! Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our infinitely reconfigurable web services and user-proof use is usually considered a remarkable achievement. We will implement the capability of communities to revolutionize. It seems incredible, but it's entirely 100 percent true! What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We think that most collaborative web sites use far too much Perl, and not enough C++. We believe we know that if you grow dynamically then you may also innovate mega-virtually. Have you ever been unable to scale your feature set? With one click? The metrics for bloatware are more well-understood if they are not client-focused. What does the commonly-accepted term "virally-distributed" really mean? The metrics for systems are more well-understood if they are not C2B2B. We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our implementation metrics but our capacity to monetize. Your budget for embracing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for growing. Without re-sizing, you will lack user communities. The obfuscation factor can be summed up in one word: short-term, C2C2C. Think virally-distributed. Think cross-media. Think mission-critical. Think back-end. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the commonly-used term "bricks-and-clicks partnerships" really mean? Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box or to be one-to-one?