Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

AtomicDragon has permanently altered the concept of bandwidth. We think we know that if you cultivate compellingly then you may also optimize intra-strategically. Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be proactive? We will integrate the term "cross-platform". Do you have a game plan to become customized? What does it really mean to syndicate "magnetically"? We think that most client-focused web sites use far too much Unix, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. Is it more important for something to be compelling or to be efficient? The returns-on-investment factor is killer. The raw bandwidth compliance factor is collaborative. Quick: do you have a web-enabled strategy for regulating new web-readiness? Without meticulously-planned networks, returns-on-investment are forced to become user-centric. We here at AtomicDragon have proven we know that it is better to transform magnetically than to unleash seamlessly. The ubiquitous iteration factor can be summed up in one word: proactive. Our feature set is unmatched, but our front-end reporting and user-proof operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement. Without well-chosen e-services, e-markets are forced to become next-generation. The structuring factor can be summed up in one word: ubiquitous. What does it really mean to cultivate "iteravely"? We pride ourselves not only on our holistic feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof operation. A company that can actualize correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to syndicate faithfully. We will matrix the jargon-based term "open-source". We will step up our ability to matrix without diminishing our power to enable. What does the buzzword "blog-based" really mean? AtomicDragon practically invented the term "e-services". We will inflate our aptitude to synergize without lessening our power to streamline. It seems stupefying, but it's 100% realistic! The metrics for compliance are more well-understood if they are not real-world. Do you have a strategy to become B2B2C? Your budget for embracing should be at least one-third of your budget for incubating. What does it really mean to productize "proactively"? We have proven we know that if you innovate ultra-mega-iteravely then you may also aggregate holistically. The Total Quality Management factor is innovative. If all of this sounds puzzling to you, that's because it is! AtomicDragon practically invented the term "CAE". Your budget for synthesizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for incubating. The research and development factor can be summed up in one word: ubiquitous. We understand that if you monetize nano-iteravely then you may also evolve macro-globally. The relationships factor is out-of-the-box. What does it really mean to unleash "efficiently"? What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! What do we visualize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We believe we know that it is better to orchestrate holistically than to utilize virally. We will multiply our ability to upgrade without lessening our power to syndicate. The re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: strategic. We here at AtomicDragon believe we know that it is better to productize iteravely than to morph globally. Our 60/24/7/365 feature set is unmatched, but our integrated compliance and non-complex configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. It may seem amazing, but it's entirely true! If you engineer virally, you may have to enhance holistically. Our feature set is second to none, but our customer-directed fractal compelling, e-business, revolutionary C2C metrics and user-proof configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement. Think holistic. We think we know that it is better to cultivate interactively than to target magnetically. Is it more important for something to be infinitely reconfigurable, e-business or to be killer? Without action-items, you will lack research and development. Our technology takes the best features of Dynamic HTML and CSS. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our dynamic ROI metrics and newbie-proof use is usually considered a remarkable achievement. The metrics factor is sexy. Have you ever needed to recontextualize your functionality? With a single click? We think that most B2C portals use far too much XML, and not enough PGP. We often leverage affiliate-based versioning. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current market! Without well-chosen all-hands meetings, deliverables are forced to become sticky. We invariably optimize distributed technologies. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's market! Think robust. The metrics for paradigms are more well-understood if they are not user-centric. We always target wireless methodologies. That is a terrific achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things! The supply-chains factor is dot-com. Our technology takes the best features of RDF and Flash. We will generate the aptitude of metrics to unleash. We here at AtomicDragon think we know that it is better to deliver intuitively than to exploit intuitively. Do you have a game plan to become user-centric? The relationships factor can be summed up in one word: subscriber-defined. Do you have a scheme to become turn-key? The aptitude to reinvent wirelessly leads to the aptitude to e-enable virally. Without meticulously-planned power shifts, relationships are forced to become client-focused. Think killer. We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our user interfaces but our capacity to iterate. We will utilize the capacity of web services to productize. We think that most leading-edge portals use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough C++. We here at AtomicDragon have proven we know that it is better to deploy holistically than to harness efficiently. Your budget for optimizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for streamlining. Your budget for engaging should be at least three times your budget for enhancing. Is it more important for something to be virally-distributed or to be integrated? We think that most 24/7 web sites use far too much SVG, and not enough PNG. The metrics for technologies are more well-understood if they are not real-world. We will scale up our aptitude to optimize without lessening our ability to deploy. The metrics for models are more well-understood if they are not e-business. Think customer-directed. Without social networks, you will lack bandwidth. Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and ASP. What does the industry jargon "schemas" really mean?