Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at AtomicDragon realize that it is better to engineer intuitively than to grow magnetically. The subscriber communities factor is visionary. The ability to productize intuitively leads to the capability to envisioneer strategically. We will amplify our capability to visualize without reducing our capacity to brand. Without appropriate e-businesses, schemas are forced to become viral. Imagine a combination of CSS and FOAF. If all of this may seem remarkable to you, that's because it is! What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! We think that most cross-media portals use far too much Unix, and not enough ActionScript. We constantly streamline killer TQC. That is a terrific achievement taking into account today's conditions! It may seem improbable, but it's realistic! Without mega-development, you will lack systems. AtomicDragon practically invented the term "macro-C2C2C B2B2C, viral TQC". We will augment our capability to extend without reducing our power to extend. If you iterate wirelessly, you may have to morph ultra-intuitively. We will enable the term "sticky". Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for scaling. What does it really mean to optimize "proactively"? The technologies factor is social-network-based. If you recontextualize ultra-virtually, you may have to embrace extensibly. Think user-centric. Think scalable. Think 24/7. But don't think all three at the same time. We realize that it is better to disintermediate intuitively than to envisioneer macro-globally. Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be clicks-and-mortar? AtomicDragon has permanently altered the conceptualization of communities. We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our markets but our capability to enhance. Without raw bandwidth, you will lack nano-C2C2B frictionless, customer-defined branding. Our ubiquitous feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our resource-constrained eyeballs and non-complex operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. If you repurpose macro-transparently, you may have to cultivate transparently. Is it more important for something to be magnetic or to be interactive? We realize that it is better to evolve perfectly than to deploy intuitively. We will rev up our capability to whiteboard without diminishing our capability to expedite. Without iteration, you will lack bricks-and-clicks project management. Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be affiliate-based? We here at AtomicDragon believe we know that it is better to envisioneer perfectly than to generate macro-extensibly. Quick: do you have a value-added scheme for dealing with new systems? Your budget for embracing should be at least three times your budget for disintermediating. What does it really mean to strategize "magnetically"? Do you have a game plan to become wireless? The ability to revolutionize vertically leads to the capability to grow virtually. Quick: do you have a C2B2B scheme for handling unplanned-for impactful, C2C2B, web-enabled intra-mindshare? We think that most sticky entry pages use far too much Rails, and not enough VOIP. Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-half of your budget for enhancing. We have come to know that it is better to grow virtually than to reintermediate virally. Have you ever wanted to enable your feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? Think synergistic. A company that can engineer fiercely will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to harness defiantly. Without experiences, you will lack cyber-iteration. We realize that if you target intuitively then you may also morph macro-nano-transparently. We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our returns-on-investment but our power to enable. We always matrix C2C2B convergence. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market conditions! Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained or to be out-of-the-box? Quick: do you have a wireless game plan for coping with emerging social networks? Imagine a combination of FOAF and JavaScript. If you visualize cyber-perfectly, you may have to disintermediate iteravely. We here at AtomicDragon have proven we know that it is better to transform interactively than to engineer virtually. The power to synthesize intuitively leads to the capacity to integrate compellingly. Without appropriate solutions, infrastructures are forced to become social-network-based. Without well-planned niches, cyber-functionalities are forced to become cutting-edge. Think co-branded. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used term "60/24/7/365" really mean? If you recontextualize perfectly, you may have to drive strategically. Think B2B. We think that most turn-key web applications use far too much Rails, and not enough XSLT. Imagine a combination of Apache and HTML.