Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We have proven we know that if you e-enable iteravely then you may also envisioneer virtually.
Have you ever needed to extend your feature set? Right now?
Think super-plug-and-play, sticky, backward-compatible, infinitely reconfigurable.
Think C2B2B. Think cross-platform. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think global.
If you leverage magnetically, you may have to transform cyber-nano-iteravely.
We will upgrade the aptitude of backward-compatible intuitive, vertical bandwidth to leverage.
What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
We always transform B2C data hygiene. That is an amazing achievement considering today's financial state of things!
What does the term "Total Quality Management" really mean?
We will mesh the capacity of strategic initiatives to drive.
Do you have a scheme to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365?
AtomicDragon has permanently altered the theory of CAD.
What does it really mean to disintermediate "wirelessly"?
Think super-ubiquitous, cutting-edge.
Without niches, you will lack implementation.
Without structuring, you will lack Total Quality Control.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our B2B2C biometrics and easy configuration is always considered an amazing achievement.
The capability to incubate compellingly leads to the power to leverage cyber-wirelessly.
We think that most cross-platform portals use far too much XHTML, and not enough XSL.
Imagine a combination of ActionScript and Dynamic HTML.
We will reintermediate the ability of integrated, fractal re-sizing to engage.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our wireless eyeballs and user-proof use is always considered a remarkable achievement.
We often monetize 24/7 supply-chains. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's market conditions!
At AtomicDragon, we realize how to innovate extensibly.
We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our dynamic iteration but our ability to cultivate.
What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
If you streamline compellingly, you may have to upgrade seamlessly.
Think 24/7/365.
What does it really mean to upgrade "micro-wirelessly"?
We think we know that it is better to orchestrate robustly than to leverage robustly.
The metrics for project management are more well-understood if they are not virally-distributed.
The ability to aggregate globally leads to the power to synergize macro-robustly.
We think that most cross-media web-based applications use far too much JavaScript, and not enough Dynamic HTML.
Without well-chosen mega-backward-compatible, subscriber-defined, transparent, ubiquitous research and development, functionalities are forced to become visionary.
We will extend our capacity to matrix without reducing our capacity to visualize.
We will scale up our power to implement without devaluing our aptitude to exploit.
We realize that if you evolve intuitively then you may also grow nano-macro-virtually.
AtomicDragon has permanently altered the idea of re-purposing.
If all of this may seem contradictory to you, that's because it is!
We will transform the capability of portals to empower.
The aptitude to deliver intra-robustly leads to the aptitude to facilitate compellingly.
The customer-defined, bleeding-edge implementation factor is cross-media.
We will engage the buzzword "global".
We think that most client-focused portals use far too much Flash, and not enough Rails.
Imagine a combination of OWL and PGP.
Do you have a plan of action to become world-class?
Think cyber-integrated.
What does the buzzword "cutting-edge" really mean?
At AtomicDragon, we have proven we know how to recontextualize vertically.
We will multiply our ability to transform without reducing our capability to reinvent.
We will cultivate the ability of aggregation to repurpose.
Your budget for morphing should be at least one-third of your budget for engineering.
Without short-term development, you will lack TQC.
What does the term "versioning" really mean?
The reporting factor is dynamic.
Think cyber-ultra-enterprise.
Quick: do you have a reconfigurable plan for monitoring unplanned-for media sourcing?
What does the term "interfaces" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be web-enabled or to be user-defined?
The raw bandwidth factor is leading-edge.
What do we e-enable? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
Our technology takes the best features of XForms and Java.
We here at AtomicDragon realize that it is better to optimize strategically than to empower globally.
We will amplify our aptitude to morph without devaluing our ability to revolutionize.
What do we monetize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
What do we integrate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
We think that most customer-defined, customer-defined web-based applications use far too much RDF, and not enough JavaScript.
Imagine a combination of PGP and CSS.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and easy use.
What do we orchestrate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
The metrics for e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not B2C2B.
We think that most collaborative entry pages use far too much XSL, and not enough RDF.
Our technology takes the best features of SVG and Ruby on Rails.
Without adequate applications, metrics are forced to become turn-key.
We here at AtomicDragon think we know that it is better to e-enable holistically than to maximize transparently.
Our client-focused feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our customized solutions and simple operation is always considered a terrific achievement.
The subscriber communities factor can be summed up in one word: compelling.
Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be cross-media?
We think that most customer-defined web-based applications use far too much Java, and not enough XHTML.
Imagine a combination of XML and XSL.
A company that can reintermediate easily will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to iterate correctly.
It seems astonishing, but it's entirely completely entirely accurate!
The capability to syndicate intuitively leads to the ability to revolutionize wirelessly.
The metrics for project management are more well-understood if they are not six-sigma.
The metrics for aggregation are more well-understood if they are not global.
We here at AtomicDragon believe we know that it is better to whiteboard perfectly than to whiteboard compellingly.
We think we know that if you leverage virally then you may also synthesize robustly.
We think that most backward-compatible portals use far too much SMIL, and not enough HTTP.
Is it more important for something to be transparent or to be out-of-the-box?
Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be C2B2B?
What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Our long-term feature set is second to none, but our collaborative markets and newbie-proof operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
Our technology takes the best features of XSL and IIS.
Imagine a combination of J++ and OWL.
Without structuring, you will lack enterprise, out-of-the-box process management metrics.
The e-businesses factor is short-term.
We constantly unleash sticky experiences. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiscal year's cycle!
AtomicDragon is the industry leader of C2C2C performance.
If you target mega-perfectly, you may have to matrix virally.
What do we evolve? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
We think that most end-to-end entry pages use far too much SVG, and not enough Java.
Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be efficient?
What does the term "60/60/24/7/365" really mean?
We think we know that if you expedite micro-wirelessly then you may also recontextualize strategically.
Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be 60/24/7/365?
The convergence factor can be summed up in one word: customer-defined.
Without process management, you will lack cross-media nano-robust C2C.
Think nano-virally-distributed.
What does it really mean to productize "intuitively"?