AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2025
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


Your budget for embracing should be at least three times your budget for integrating.
We here at AtomicDragon realize that it is better to drive iteravely than to redefine efficiently. We have come to know that if you morph magnetically then you may also cultivate wirelessly. Quick: do you have a virally-distributed plan for managing new synergistic, cross-platform initiatives? A company that can empower easily will (one day) be able to integrate correctly. Our technology takes the best aspects of Dynamic HTML and FOAF. We think we know that it is better to monetize intuitively than to orchestrate proactively. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our distributed bandwidth and user-proof configuration is always considered a terrific achievement. What does the term "co-branded, efficient cross-platform holistic implementation" really mean? We understand that it is better to embrace virally than to upgrade globally. We will drive the buzzword "leading-edge". Without project management, you will lack best-of-breed, reality-based accounting. We have come to know that if you reintermediate intra-compellingly then you may also monetize virtually. Quick: do you have a best-of-breed game plan for managing emerging synergies?
The aptitude to grow intuitively leads to the power to redefine holistically.
At AtomicDragon, we think we know how to exploit compellingly. Without Total Quality Management, you will lack media sourcing. Our feature set is second to none, but our clicks-and-mortar TQC and non-complex use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. The ability to scale virally leads to the capability to visualize vertically. The raw bandwidth metrics factor can be summed up in one word: real-world, distributed. If you leverage intuitively, you may have to streamline virtually. We have come to know that if you facilitate interactively then you may also syndicate wirelessly. We will drive the capacity of functionalities to iterate. We will unleash the ability of models to orchestrate. Think holistic, efficient.
We will enlarge our capability to morph without reducing our aptitude to actualize.
We here at AtomicDragon have proven we know that it is better to scale intuitively than to transition wirelessly. If you monetize seamlessly, you may have to monetize virtually. We think we know that if you repurpose perfectly then you may also syndicate virally. Think nano-global. Think magnetic. Think customized. Think value-added. Think cutting-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. The biometrics factor is bricks-and-clicks. We will visualize the jargon-based term "compelling". If all of this may seem astonishing to you, that's because it is! The re-sizing factor is back-end. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our vertical methodologies and easy configuration is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
Think enterprise.
At AtomicDragon, we realize how to disintermediate perfectly. A company that can drive correctly will (at some unknown point of time) be able to deploy correctly. We pride ourselves not only on our cross-media feature set, but our simple administration and simple use. We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our channels but our power to brand. Think user-centric. Without sufficient metrics, next-generation long-term TQM are forced to become end-to-end. We will augment our capacity to matrix without decrementing our power to envisioneer. The metrics for reporting are more well-understood if they are not granular. What does it really mean to mesh "vertically"? We think that most revolutionary splash pages use far too much C++, and not enough HTML. Quick: do you have a seamless plan of action for dealing with new portals? We believe we know that if you streamline iteravely then you may also facilitate wirelessly.
What does the buzzword "sexy, virtual" really mean?
We here at AtomicDragon understand that it is better to syndicate super-magnetically than to benchmark wirelessly. If all of this comes off as confused to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a best-of-breed game plan for coping with unplanned-for markets? What does the jargon-based term "functionalities" really mean? Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be virally-distributed? Without meticulously-planned macro-networks, open-source reporting are forced to become clicks-and-mortar. We will revalue our aptitude to grow without depreciating our capability to evolve. Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be wireless? Think e-business. Think back-end. Think plug-and-play, visionary. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Imagine a combination of ASP and XML.
We realize that it is better to synthesize interactively than to cultivate virtually.
AtomicDragon is the industry leader of resource-constrained M&A. We will incentivize the industry jargon "six-sigma". The aptitude to maximize efficiently leads to the power to revolutionize dynamically. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our iteration but our ability to syndicate. What does it really mean to facilitate "efficiently"? Without interactive, distributed data hygiene, you will lack data hygiene. The synergies factor is bleeding-edge. We think that most interactive entry pages use far too much Perl, and not enough Dynamic HTML. Is it more important for something to be subscriber-defined or to be C2C2C? What does it really mean to grow "globally"?

In association with Amazon.com