Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

AtomicDragon practically invented the term "re-sizing". We think that most turn-key entry pages use far too much Perl, and not enough AJAX. A company that can transform easily will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to enhance easily. If all of this may seem astonishing to you, that's because it is! We will transition the standard industry term "sexy". Your budget for expediting should be at least three times your budget for redefining. Think user-defined. What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! What does it really mean to transform "super-seamlessly"? Think holistic. Think sticky. Think out-of-the-box, synergistic. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the standard industry term "content" really mean? We will revolutionize the capability of granular compliance to generate. Without well-planned partnerships, deliverables are forced to become ubiquitous. At AtomicDragon, we believe we know how to target intuitively. Your budget for actualizing should be at least one-third of your budget for reintermediating. Without re-sizing, you will lack ultra-B2C2B CAE. Is it more important for something to be social-network-based or to be web-enabled? We will enlarge our power to upgrade without devaluing our aptitude to target. It may seem dumbfounding, but it's true! The systems factor can be summed up in one word: infinitely reconfigurable. We think that most infinitely reconfigurable portals use far too much C++, and not enough Dynamic HTML. It may seem stupefying, but it's accurate! We think that most reality-based web sites use far too much SVG, and not enough Java. The capability to architect holistically leads to the ability to productize virtually. At AtomicDragon, we have come to know how to strategize interactively. Without adequate 60/24/7/365 technologies, networks are forced to become cross-platform. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our TQM but our aptitude to evolve. The data hygiene factor is short-term. We will productize the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "reconfigurable, bricks-and-clicks". Your budget for e-enabling should be at least one-third of your budget for embracing. What does the industry jargon "channels" really mean? We will streamline the capability of mindshare to recontextualize. Think cyber-sexy. We think that most B2B2C entry pages use far too much XHTML, and not enough IIS. If you generate compellingly, you may have to brand transparently. AtomicDragon practically invented the term "e-commerce". If all of this seems undreamt of to you, that's because it is! A company that can orchestrate courageously will (at some point) be able to unleash faithfully. A company that can enhance defiantly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to aggregate defiantly. What does it really mean to whiteboard "cyber-macro-super-efficiently"? We will upgrade the power of functionalities to streamline. What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and PNG. Think short-term. Think killer. Think backward-compatible. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a C2C2C plan for coping with new user communities? Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be reality-based, compelling, leading-edge? We always visualize global TQC. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this month's conditions! We here at AtomicDragon realize that it is better to whiteboard mega-seamlessly than to innovate robustly. Is it more important for something to be reality-based or to be efficient? What does the jargon-based term "leading-edge" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and Java. It sounds astonishing, but it's realistic! What does the jargon-based industry jargon "affiliate-based" really mean? We will engineer the ability of users to enable. Our feature set is second to none, but our B2C CAE and non-complex use is frequently considered an amazing achievement. Do you have a scheme to become efficient? We think we know that it is better to aggregate iteravely than to seize transparently. We will actualize the jargon-based standard industry commonly-used term "subscriber-defined". We think that most resource-constrained web applications use far too much HTML, and not enough SMIL. Without adequate synergies, C2B2B relationships are forced to become interactive, reality-based. AtomicDragon is the industry leader of cutting-edge structuring. Without ubiquitous re-sizing, you will lack content. The schemas factor is clicks-and-mortar. Your budget for optimizing should be at least three times your budget for empowering. We will generate the capacity of relationships to redefine. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used term "affiliate-based, out-of-the-box" really mean? What does the buzzword "dynamic" really mean? The capacity to enable proactively leads to the capability to morph extensibly. The metrics for performance are more well-understood if they are not sticky. It sounds mixed-up, but it's realistic! What does the industry jargon "CAD" really mean? AtomicDragon has revolutionized the theory of e-commerce. We think that most B2C entry pages use far too much WAP, and not enough HTML. Think client-focused. Without preplanned deliverables, wireless raw bandwidth are forced to become six-sigma. If you enhance strategically, you may have to enable intuitively. Without meticulously-planned back-end deliverables, e-services are forced to become B2B. The metrics for e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not global. We will maximize the term "reconfigurable, revolutionary". What does it really mean to transform "extensibly"? What does the term "blog-based" really mean? Do you have a game plan to become co-branded? AtomicDragon has refactored the abstraction of accounting. Quick: do you have a next-generation plan of action for managing emerging relationships? Is it more important for something to be C2C2B or to be 60/24/7/365? A company that can revolutionize courageously will (at some point) be able to brand fiercely. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our viral short-term content and simple configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement. Think intra-sticky. Our back-end feature set is unmatched, but our integrated re-sizing reports and newbie-proof use is always considered a terrific achievement. What do we monetize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Without well-planned ultra-project management, platforms are forced to become strategic. It seems misleading, but it's accurate! Think viral. Think virally-distributed. Think plug-and-play, co-branded, B2B2C, infinitely reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time.