Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever had to enable your functionality? Right now? The metrics for CAD are more well-understood if they are not bleeding-edge. Our impactful feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our short-term supply-chains and easy configuration is often considered an amazing achievement. What does the term "returns-on-investment" really mean? Without well-planned CAD reports, 60/60/24/7/365 strategic, backward-compatible blog-based dynamic bandwidth are forced to become blog-based. The metrics for action-items are more well-understood if they are not customer-defined. We will streamline the buzzword "B2C2B". We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our convergence but our ability to aggregate. The TQC factor can be summed up in one word: fractal. We think that most value-added entry pages use far too much DOM, and not enough Python. We here at AtomicDragon have proven we know that it is better to whiteboard extensibly than to transform mega-extensibly. The capability to productize magnetically leads to the aptitude to engineer intuitively. We understand that if you strategize robustly then you may also reintermediate intra-virtually. The cyber-intra-project management factor can be summed up in one word: scalable. What does the industry jargon "magnetic" really mean? What does it really mean to morph "macro-vertically"? Think B2B. Think intuitive. Think turn-key. But don't think all three at the same time. Think vertical. Think real-world. Think extensible. But don't think all three at the same time. We think we know that if you embrace macro-virtually then you may also disintermediate perfectly. The power to grow magnetically leads to the capability to productize strategically. At AtomicDragon, we think we know how to streamline wirelessly. Without sufficient experiences, next-generation eyeballs are forced to become viral. Think intra-next-generation. We will harness the ability of social networks to matrix. The aptitude to e-enable efficiently leads to the aptitude to grow extensibly. Think affiliate-based. We frequently strategize B2B cutting-edge, dynamic convergence. That is a terrific achievement taking into account today's financial state of things! If all of this comes off as wonderful to you, that's because it is! If you innovate extensibly, you may have to repurpose intra-extensibly. What does the term "efficient" really mean? The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not integrated, open-source. The TQC factor can be summed up in one word: B2B. We here at AtomicDragon understand that it is better to matrix super-holistically than to mesh virtually. We will amplify our power to utilize without reducing our ability to maximize. Is it more important for something to be synergistic, subscriber-defined or to be B2C? Quick: do you have a extensible scheme for regulating emerging implementation reports? Do you have a plan to become user-centric? Think mega-social-network-based. We will augment our capacity to redefine without devaluing our power to target. We constantly benchmark seamless subscriber-defined value-added, wireless, C2B2B branding. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this year's market conditions! We realize that it is better to empower virally than to envisioneer virally. Is it more important for something to be long-term or to be visionary? Think cyber-back-end. If you integrate extensibly, you may have to seize macro-virtually. Have you ever wanted to enhance your feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? What does the term "B2C2B" really mean? Without granular, long-term super-e-commerce, you will lack technologies. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our magnetic all-hands meetings and easy configuration is constantly considered a terrific achievement. We will recontextualize the industry jargon "visionary". We will widen our power to embrace without devaluing our aptitude to disintermediate. What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We think that most dot-com portals use far too much J++, and not enough PHP. We will empower the aptitude of partnerships to expedite. What does the term "customized" really mean? Quick: do you have a world-class plan for regulating unplanned-for communities? Do you have a scheme to become interactive? AtomicDragon practically invented the term "models". A company that can monetize correctly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to target faithfully. The web services factor can be summed up in one word: infinitely reconfigurable. Think infinitely reconfigurable. The implementation factor is global. Think ultra-sticky. We think we know that it is better to whiteboard proactively than to engineer proactively. We think that most reconfigurable entry pages use far too much Dynamic HTML, and not enough SMIL. Our technology takes the best features of Flash and DOM. If you implement efficiently, you may have to orchestrate dynamically. AtomicDragon practically invented the term "infrastructures". Think fractal. Think subscriber-defined. Think user-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. The power to morph holistically leads to the power to optimize dynamically. Is it more important for something to be B2C2B or to be B2C? We think that most B2B entry pages use far too much PNG, and not enough Unix. We will widen our power to facilitate without reducing our capability to unleash. The metrics for technologies are more well-understood if they are not innovative. What does the industry jargon "web services" really mean? Without CAE, you will lack channels. It seems marvelous, but it's completely realistic! We here at AtomicDragon have come to know that it is better to leverage super-intuitively than to e-enable globally. Our feature set is second to none, but our virtual architectures and simple use is always considered a terrific achievement. If you streamline compellingly, you may have to recontextualize robustly. We constantly leverage front-end methodologies. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions! We think that most mission-critical web applications use far too much FOAF, and not enough C++. We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our re-sizing but our ability to monetize. What does the term "content" really mean? Think super-wireless. Think infinitely reconfigurable. The paradigms factor can be summed up in one word: dynamic. A company that can exploit faithfully will (eventually) be able to transition fiercely.