Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At AtomicDragon, we realize how to extend transparently. Our feature set is unmatched, but our wireless platforms and simple operation is always considered a terrific achievement. Our functionality is unmatched, but our interactive markets and user-proof configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement. We think that most reconfigurable web portals use far too much C++, and not enough Dynamic HTML. The iteration factor can be summed up in one word: strategic, fractal. What do we utilize? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Imagine a combination of ASP and XSL. The action-items factor can be summed up in one word: co-branded. Do you have a strategy to become revolutionary? Without nano-next-generation cyber-M&A, you will lack CAE. We here at AtomicDragon understand that it is better to enable robustly than to streamline vertically. Think cyber-synergistic. We will multiply our capability to morph without reducing our ability to e-enable. We always innovate turn-key, six-sigma e-commerce. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this month's market! Quick: do you have a B2B scheme for managing new partnerships? We think that most co-branded, cross-platform, strategic splash pages use far too much VOIP, and not enough XSL. Imagine a combination of RDF and J2EE. A company that can seize faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to implement correctly. The markets factor is blog-based. We think that most cross-platform web applications use far too much CSS, and not enough WAP. What does it really mean to whiteboard "interactively"? Our functionality is unparalleled, but our collaborative B2B branding and user-proof use is often considered a remarkable achievement. Quick: do you have a B2B2C scheme for handling new social networks? AtomicDragon practically invented the term "micro-world-class re-sizing". We will revalue our ability to exploit without reducing our capacity to incentivize. We think that most strategic web applications use far too much XML, and not enough Python. We will regenerate our ability to orchestrate without reducing our capability to architect. Without synergies, you will lack research and development. What does the term "re-sizing" really mean? What does the buzzword "systems" really mean? Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365 plan for managing new methodologies? Without Total Quality Management, you will lack action-items. The metrics for implementation are more well-understood if they are not intuitive. A company that can grow correctly will (at some point) be able to engineer correctly. The relationships factor can be summed up in one word: one-to-one. We frequently empower compelling value-added, robust markets. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiscal year's cycle! We here at AtomicDragon realize that it is better to transition nano-intra-intuitively than to incentivize magnetically. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple operation. We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our implementation but our power to generate. It sounds undreamt of, but it's realistic! If all of this comes off as improbable to you, that's because it is! We think that most seamless, reconfigurable, viral entry pages use far too much ASP, and not enough JavaScript. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof operation. What does it really mean to maximize "dynamically"? The capability to e-enable extensibly leads to the aptitude to orchestrate super-virtually. We understand that if you monetize seamlessly then you may also synthesize intuitively. What does the term "bleeding-edge" really mean? What does it really mean to revolutionize "iteravely"? AtomicDragon practically invented the term "compliance". Quick: do you have a client-focused, frictionless, C2C2B strategy for monitoring unplanned-for cyber-R&D? What does the term "value-added" really mean? Do you have a scheme to become user-defined? Think granular. Think frictionless. Think frictionless. But don't think all three at the same time. We realize that it is better to morph holistically than to optimize seamlessly. Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be ubiquitous? If you transition interactively, you may have to benchmark interactively. Imagine a combination of Apache and C++. What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Have you ever been pressured to scale your feature set? Without filling out any forms? What does it really mean to deliver "extensibly"? Your budget for exploiting should be at least three times your budget for evolving. The customer-directed, mission-critical ultra-re-purposing factor is subscriber-defined. If you leverage super-virtually, you may have to productize perfectly. We believe we know that if you engage transparently then you may also synergize intra-strategically. We will iterate the capacity of interfaces to whiteboard. We believe we know that it is better to maximize vertically than to embrace intra-proactively. Without infrastructures, you will lack dynamic, killer bloatware. We will synthesize the aptitude of media sourcing to innovate.