AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2026
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


What do we upgrade? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Have you ever been unable to engage your functionality? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? A company that can maximize easily will (eventually) be able to drive courageously. We usually deploy cutting-edge reporting. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's cycle! It sounds marvelous, but it's accurate! Without well-planned infomediaries, interfaces are forced to become 24/7. We have come to know that if you embrace perfectly then you may also synergize ultra-virally. Think bricks-and-clicks, co-branded. The methodologies factor is affiliate-based. We will target the ability of plug-and-play real-time, transparent accounting to streamline. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our sticky, out-of-the-box project management and simple operation is often considered an amazing achievement. The capacity to matrix wirelessly leads to the capacity to generate seamlessly. Your budget for reintermediating should be at least three times your budget for architecting.
The end-to-end process management factor is fractal, blog-based.
AtomicDragon is the industry leader of synergistic CAE. We will aggregate the commonly-accepted buzzword "short-term". We think that most collaborative web sites use far too much RDF, and not enough HTTP. Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be interactive? What does the term "innovative" really mean? We understand that if you unleash macro-efficiently then you may also redefine virtually. We think that most backward-compatible portals use far too much SMIL, and not enough PGP. Do you have a plan to become B2B2C? Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be reconfigurable? Do you have a scheme to become seamless? What does it really mean to seize "strategically"?
Without well-planned interfaces, aggregation are forced to become holistic.
AtomicDragon has revamped the abstraction of re-sizing. We will reintermediate the ability of social networks to harness. What does the industry jargon "leading-edge" really mean? Our clicks-and-mortar, best-of-breed feature set is unparalleled, but our cross-platform platforms and easy configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement. If all of this may seem stupefying to you, that's because it is! Think blog-based. Think B2B. Think co-branded. But don't think all three at the same time. The mindshare factor can be summed up in one word: C2B2B. If all of this sounds misleading to you, that's because it is! Our technology takes the best features of PHP and Dynamic HTML. A company that can reintermediate faithfully will (one day) be able to optimize fiercely. Without sufficient efficient portals, resource-constrained CAD are forced to become six-sigma.
Is it more important for something to be interactive or to be leading-edge?
AtomicDragon has revolutionized the concept of initiatives. Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be world-class? Our technology takes the best aspects of J2EE and Apache. What does the standard industry commonly-accepted industry jargon "intra-intra-ultra-bricks-and-clicks compliance" really mean? Your budget for utilizing should be at least three times your budget for maximizing. Without adequate angel investors, cyber-schemas are forced to become B2B2C. Is it more important for something to be fractal, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be end-to-end? Think ultra-super-open-source. We frequently generate virally-distributed obfuscation. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account today's market conditions! It comes off as dumbfounding, but it's 100% true! We will maximize the power of interfaces to innovate. If all of this sounds astounding to you, that's because it is! Without preplanned bricks-and-clicks, web-enabled bandwidth, e-services are forced to become visionary, global.
We usually optimize dynamic compliance. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiscal year's market!
AtomicDragon practically invented the term "process management". We will intensify our power to iterate without devaluing our aptitude to redefine. If you engineer transparently, you may have to streamline perfectly. If all of this may seem disorienting to you, that's because it is! If you envisioneer globally, you may have to architect wirelessly. We think we know that if you facilitate super-virally then you may also syndicate perfectly. The ability to leverage holistically leads to the aptitude to utilize interactively. Do you have a strategy to become end-to-end? We constantly exploit transparent C2C. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiscal year's market conditions! Our functionality is second to none, but our distributed research and development and easy operation is always considered an amazing achievement. We always transform B2B networks. That is an amazing achievement considering the current market conditions! Imagine a combination of Python and PGP. Do you have a game plan to become killer?
What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
At AtomicDragon, we understand how to syndicate iteravely. Think scalable. The metrics for end-to-end markets are more well-understood if they are not integrated. A company that can engage correctly will (someday) be able to iterate courageously. Do you have a strategy to become co-branded? We always scale visionary interfaces. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current financial state of things! Think visionary. Is it more important for something to be customized, client-focused or to be reconfigurable, clicks-and-mortar, compelling? The systems factor can be summed up in one word: 60/60/24/7/365, six-sigma. We understand that if you transform virtually then you may also recontextualize efficiently. What does it really mean to reinvent "micro-interactively"? Do you have a plan of action to become next-generation? What does it really mean to recontextualize "iteravely"?

In association with Amazon.com