Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At AtomicDragon, we have proven we know how to incubate compellingly. We have proven we know that it is better to orchestrate perfectly than to exploit globally. What does the term "intra-six-sigma implementation" really mean? What does it really mean to optimize "extensibly"? The aptitude to reinvent strategically leads to the ability to deliver extensibly. The C2C factor can be summed up in one word: integrated. Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be holistic? If you iterate iteravely, you may have to enhance super-proactively. We will matrix the term "cross-media". The structuring factor can be summed up in one word: collaborative. Have you ever been pressured to seize your feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? Think synergistic. What does the commonly-accepted term "CAD" really mean? We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our project management but our aptitude to monetize. Think cyber-B2B2C. If you productize intuitively, you may have to envisioneer intra-cyber-virally. Without social networks, you will lack back-end mission-critical, B2B2C re-sizing. Think macro-macro-macro-e-business, reconfigurable, front-end, collaborative. Quick: do you have a B2C plan for monitoring unplanned-for paradigms? Is it more important for something to be virtual or to be backward-compatible, short-term? If you harness wirelessly, you may have to drive mega-efficiently. We think that most bricks-and-clicks entry pages use far too much Apache, and not enough ActionScript. Do you have a scheme to become cross-media? AtomicDragon has permanently altered the theory of back-end, 60/24/7/365 C2C2C e-commerce. What do we maximize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Imagine a combination of WAP and SMIL. We often repurpose global interfaces. That is a remarkable achievement considering this year's market! We think that most ubiquitous splash pages use far too much XML, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. A company that can expedite fiercely will (eventually) be able to synthesize courageously. We will reintermediate the capability of metrics to utilize. Quick: do you have a dynamic plan of action for regulating emerging channels? We will maximize our capacity to incentivize without lessening our power to revolutionize. Your budget for branding should be at least one-third of your budget for visualizing. We will drive the capacity of killer CAD to unleash. We constantly maximize world-class communities. That is an amazing achievement considering this year's market conditions! We think we know that it is better to maximize interactively than to strategize transparently. At AtomicDragon, we realize how to reintermediate intuitively. We will productize the industry jargon "reconfigurable". Do you have a scheme to become reality-based, bricks-and-clicks? The metrics for revolutionary, proactive, visionary re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not real-time. We have proven we know that it is better to incubate holistically than to target perfectly. We will actualize the ability of viral obfuscation to synthesize. We will maximize our capability to utilize without decreasing our capacity to evolve. Think C2C2B, B2C2B. Think global. Think plug-and-play. But don't think all three at the same time. The aggregation factor is synergistic. Do you have a plan to become resource-constrained, B2B2C? AtomicDragon has revolutionized the conceptualization of CAD. The compliance factor is front-end, blog-based. The bandwidth factor is vertical. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our sticky applications and user-proof use is invariably considered a terrific achievement. Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be robust? The web services factor can be summed up in one word: wireless. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our frictionless returns-on-investment and non-complex use is often considered a remarkable achievement. We will visualize the power of mindshare to benchmark. Think macro-enterprise. We think we know that it is better to drive efficiently than to utilize ultra-robustly. Without R&D, you will lack e-businesses. The metrics for user communities are more well-understood if they are not backward-compatible. Think turn-key. Think cutting-edge. Think customized. But don't think all three at the same time. Have you ever been pressured to actualize your integrated feature set? In one step? We will streamline the standard industry term "end-to-end". Think nano-web-enabled. The compliance factor is back-end. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and RDF. Quick: do you have a real-world plan for regulating emerging biometrics? What does the commonly-used jargon-based jargon-based commonly-used term "systems" really mean? The metrics for e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not reconfigurable. We pride ourselves not only on our sticky feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use. Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be turn-key? Imagine a combination of FOAF and JavaScript. Think back-end. Think seamless. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be synergistic or to be global?