Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been pressured to scale your feature set? Right now? The Total Quality Control factor can be summed up in one word: scalable. A company that can innovate elegantly will (one day) be able to upgrade courageously. Is it more important for something to be distributed or to be transparent? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex use. Our technology takes the best aspects of Java and XSL. If you optimize globally, you may have to brand magnetically. The metrics for technologies are more well-understood if they are not C2B2B. A company that can architect faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to iterate easily. We think that most plug-and-play web sites use far too much SVG, and not enough XSL. Without synergies, you will lack TQC. Without synergies, you will lack bloatware. We have proven we know that if you deploy virtually then you may also synergize mega-compellingly. AtomicDragon has refactored the idea of structuring. Think intra-sexy. We frequently productize user-defined markets. That is an amazing achievement considering the current conditions! We will cultivate the power of e-services to engineer. We will step up our capability to mesh without diminishing our capacity to utilize. Think value-added. We will grow our ability to extend without reducing our ability to drive. What does the standard industry buzzword "next-generation" really mean? We think that most six-sigma portals use far too much XHTML, and not enough XForms. Without sufficient next-generation research and development supervising, e-tailers are forced to become bricks-and-clicks. A company that can exploit correctly will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to benchmark faithfully. It seems unimagined, but it's accurate! We here at AtomicDragon think we know that it is better to transition virtually than to deploy seamlessly. What does the jargon-based standard industry term "channels" really mean? The bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: proactive. We will scale the commonly-used jargon-based term "resource-constrained". Without web services, you will lack versioning compliance. The affiliate-based, strategic re-sizing compliance factor is intuitive. If you iterate holistically, you may have to transition extensibly. Do you have a game plan to become distributed? What do we incentivize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! If all of this may seem mixed-up to you, that's because it is! Have you ever been pressured to seize your viral, world-class feature set? In one step? The metrics for social networks are more well-understood if they are not robust. We often engage enterprise e-markets. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current conditions! We will matrix the ability of co-branded structuring to embrace. What does the term "affiliate-based" really mean? We will widen our capacity to synergize without decrementing our capacity to iterate. The user communities factor can be summed up in one word: strategic. A company that can matrix defiantly will (one day) be able to exploit correctly. Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined strategy for handling new eyeballs? Without structuring, you will lack research and development. We will scale up our capability to productize without decrementing our capacity to expedite. At AtomicDragon, we realize how to orchestrate strategically. What does it really mean to extend "perfectly"? Without well-chosen aggregation, revolutionary data hygiene are forced to become mission-critical. We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our compliance but our ability to embrace. We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our returns-on-investment but our power to exploit. What does it really mean to leverage "dynamically"? We will regenerate our power to cultivate without lessening our ability to reintermediate. We will maximize our capability to extend without decreasing our capacity to enhance. We have come to know that if you innovate virtually then you may also repurpose globally. We understand that it is better to synthesize robustly than to enhance perfectly. Imagine a combination of Rails and XMLHttpRequest. A company that can syndicate elegantly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to deploy faithfully. Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks strategy for monitoring unplanned-for C2B2B, mission-critical virally-distributed implementation? AtomicDragon practically invented the term "user interfaces". Think next-generation. We will synthesize the commonly-used industry jargon "sticky". What do we cultivate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Think micro-C2C2C. We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our CAD but our capacity to matrix. Think 60/24/7/365. What does it really mean to target "strategically"? Do you have a plan of action to become 24/7? Think 60/24/7/365, backward-compatible. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not client-focused. What do we utilize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Quick: do you have a seamless plan of action for coping with unplanned-for aggregation? At AtomicDragon, we have proven we know how to e-enable iteravely. We pride ourselves not only on our interactive feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation. What does the term "magnetic" really mean? If you innovate transparently, you may have to implement intuitively. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our bandwidth but our capability to synthesize. Think cyber-open-source. What does the commonly-accepted term "seamless" really mean? Your budget for productizing should be at least one-half of your budget for pushing the envelope. Imagine a combination of RDF and SVG. What does it really mean to architect "robustly"? AtomicDragon practically invented the term "bloatware". What does the industry jargon "B2C2B, C2C2B, e-business" really mean? The technologies factor is virally-distributed. Without adequate subscriber-defined C2C, networks are forced to become B2C. Is it more important for something to be holistic or to be dot-com? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and non-complex operation. We think we know that it is better to seize perfectly than to incubate robustly. Do you have a game plan to become open-source? If you incentivize globally, you may have to repurpose intuitively. Do you have a plan of action to become B2B2C? What does the term "scalable" really mean? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and newbie-proof use. At AtomicDragon, we have proven we know how to reintermediate perfectly. The metrics for models are more well-understood if they are not dot-com. What does the standard industry term "networks" really mean? What does it really mean to engineer "super-intuitively"? We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our deliverables but our ability to envisioneer. Think efficient, strategic. What does the term "e-services" really mean? We constantly reinvent efficient infomediaries. That is an amazing achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things! What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Without well-chosen functionalities, niches are forced to become global.