AndrewDavidson.com.  We don't reinvent the wheel... we just make reinventing the wheel easier. Visit PDFCalendar.com for free customizable printable calendars.
Home
Resources
Software
Links
Articles
About
About Drew
Contact
Feedback
Subscribe to our Newsletter:
Printer-Friendly
© 1999-2018
Andrew Davidson.
All Rights Reserved.

Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Company Name: 

Your Randomly-Generated Corporate Gibberish:


We think we know that if you iterate wirelessly then you may also reinvent proactively.
Have you ever needed to evolve your dynamic feature set? Right now? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple use. Our technology takes the best features of XSLT and XSLT. It may seem wonderful, but it's true! Think macro-efficient. We think we know that if you deploy intuitively then you may also generate interactively. What does the term "user-defined" really mean? Imagine a combination of OWL and Python. Our feature set is unmatched, but our frictionless, B2B2C B2C, blog-based R&D and non-complex operation is always considered a remarkable achievement. The Total Quality Management factor is 60/24/7/365.
Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think customer-directed. Think distributed. But don't think all three at the same time.
AssCo practically invented the term "accounting". Quick: do you have a real-world strategy for handling unplanned-for e-tailers? We think we know that it is better to brand macro-perfectly than to harness holistically. Without deliverables, you will lack e-commerce. Think intra-compelling. Without well-planned e-markets, portals are forced to become dynamic. Quick: do you have a customized scheme for regulating new functionalities? What does the term "C2C metrics" really mean? We will drive the commonly-accepted term "one-to-one, resource-constrained". Your budget for matrixing should be at least three times your budget for scaling. We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our re-purposing but our capability to engage. What does the commonly-accepted commonly-used term "structuring" really mean?
What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "24/7" really mean?
AssCo has revolutionized the abstraction of impactful blog-based structuring. The metrics for performance metrics are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one. Imagine a combination of FOAF and Perl. We pride ourselves not only on our B2C feature set, but our simple administration and simple use. We have come to know that it is better to drive intuitively than to productize compellingly. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our Total Quality Management but our capacity to aggregate. We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our cross-media, six-sigma versioning but our capacity to extend. The capacity to e-enable ultra-intuitively leads to the power to whiteboard efficiently. Our technology takes the best features of Perl and Rails. What does the term "holistic, long-term" really mean? The capacity to target strategically leads to the capability to deploy transparently. Quick: do you have a affiliate-based plan of action for monitoring new niches? What does the term "TQM" really mean?
Without well-chosen C2C metrics, aggregation are forced to become enterprise.
Have you ever wanted to syndicate your 60/24/7/365 feature set? In one step? We will extend our power to mesh without decrementing our aptitude to enhance. The ability to extend globally leads to the capability to harness iteravely. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based commonly-used commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-accepted buzzword "client-focused" really mean? The front-end reporting factor can be summed up in one word: turn-key. What does it really mean to enhance "interactively"? Your budget for pushing the envelope should be at least three times your budget for targeting. If you seize intra-micro-extensibly, you may have to monetize holistically. A company that can envisioneer fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to implement easily. Think customer-directed. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our customer-defined CAD and newbie-proof configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement. Without structuring, you will lack platforms. Quick: do you have a six-sigma plan of action for dealing with new metrics?
Your budget for meshing should be at least one-half of your budget for synthesizing.
At AssCo, we have proven we know how to benchmark interactively. Our technology takes the best aspects of VOIP and Perl. The TQC factor can be summed up in one word: reconfigurable. Your budget for integrating should be at least one-half of your budget for scaling. Imagine a combination of XSLT and ASP. Without versioning, you will lack technologies. We will deliver the term "holistic". Think proactive. Think revolutionary. Think short-term. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the standard industry commonly-used term "blog-based, bleeding-edge project management" really mean? Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-third of your budget for upgrading. We will multiply our power to synergize without lessening our capability to innovate. Think ultra-best-of-breed. The iteration factor is real-world.
Our technology takes the best aspects of WAP and Perl.
AssCo practically invented the term "dynamic, synergistic project management". We believe we know that if you revolutionize magnetically then you may also mesh globally. Is it more important for something to be transparent or to be plug-and-play? We will deliver the jargon-based buzzword "blog-based". A company that can matrix courageously will (at some point) be able to cultivate defiantly. The metrics for supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not short-term. If you evolve strategically, you may have to synthesize efficiently. The metrics for re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one. The metrics for e-services are more well-understood if they are not intuitive. We will syndicate the term "cross-media".
We will raise our ability to whiteboard without decrementing our capability to exploit.
Have you ever had to disintermediate your functionality? In one step? A company that can evolve easily will (at some point) be able to enhance courageously. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and ASP. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our global branding and newbie-proof use is often considered a terrific achievement. Without implementation, you will lack ROI metrics. We will exploit the commonly-used standard industry term "innovative". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy operation. We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our compliance but our power to cultivate. Without meticulously-planned applications, biometrics are forced to become magnetic. The metrics for cyber-B2C2B Total Quality Control monitoring are more well-understood if they are not cross-media. If you benchmark perfectly, you may have to harness proactively. Quick: do you have a scalable plan for regulating unplanned-for user communities? The cutting-edge revolutionary, killer structuring factor can be summed up in one word: plug-and-play.

In association with Amazon.com