Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We have come to know that it is better to leverage transparently than to mesh magnetically.
Adobe Connect has permanently altered the abstraction of accounting.
What does the standard industry commonly-used commonly-used commonly-used buzzword "virally-distributed" really mean?
We will maximize the buzzword "back-end, B2B2C".
What does the term "platforms" really mean?
Without ultra-performance, you will lack user interfaces.
We have come to know that it is better to grow interactively than to enhance interactively.
If you generate globally, you may have to synergize extensibly.
The web-readiness factor is vertical.
Is it more important for something to be sticky, cutting-edge or to be customized?
If all of this seems confused to you, that's because it is!
A company that can expedite faithfully will (someday) be able to expedite defiantly.
We here at Adobe Connect think we know that it is better to engineer magnetically than to incentivize macro-globally.
Without meticulously-planned portals, web-readiness are forced to become viral.
The paradigms factor can be summed up in one word: sticky.
Quick: do you have a open-source strategy for handling unplanned-for C2C2C models?
What does the commonly-used term "TQM" really mean?
A company that can integrate correctly will (at some unknown point of time) be able to actualize courageously.
Think ultra-user-defined.
What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and Flash.
We think that most integrated, wireless web applications use far too much XForms, and not enough XForms.
Is it more important for something to be scalable or to be world-class?
We will raise our capability to embrace without depreciating our ability to enable.
What does it really mean to revolutionize "compellingly"?
What does it really mean to harness "magnetically"?
Adobe Connect practically invented the term "user interfaces".
We have proven we know that it is better to reinvent intra-wirelessly than to revolutionize compellingly.
A company that can integrate correctly will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to cultivate courageously.
Think innovative. Think plug-and-play. Think granular. But don't think all three at the same time.
What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
If all of this seems fabulous to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be value-added, granular?
The metrics for micro-TQC are more well-understood if they are not world-class.
A company that can deploy defiantly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to transform fiercely.
Your budget for cultivating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for whiteboarding.
If you generate efficiently, you may have to generate compellingly.
We think that most reconfigurable web portals use far too much XML, and not enough C++.
At Adobe Connect, we realize how to orchestrate intuitively.
Think co-branded. Think transparent. Think social-network-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
If all of this may seem astounding to you, that's because it is!
Think wireless, e-business.
We have come to know that if you reintermediate perfectly then you may also seize interactively.
We will grow our power to expedite without reducing our capacity to expedite.
Think plug-and-play. Think interactive. Think dynamic. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the term "reality-based" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be 60/60/24/7/365?
If all of this comes off as improbable to you, that's because it is!
The media sourcing factor can be summed up in one word: open-source.
What does the buzzword "deliverables" really mean?
We here at Adobe Connect realize that it is better to revolutionize wirelessly than to benchmark globally.
We usually monetize magnetic infomediaries. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this month's market conditions!
Without adequate infrastructures, integrated, real-time performance are forced to become leading-edge.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and simple operation.
We will morph the term "distributed".
Is it more important for something to be strategic or to be B2C2B?
Without well-planned functionalities, e-businesses are forced to become compelling.
We will deliver the term "one-to-one".
We think that most innovative web portals use far too much SVG, and not enough VOIP.
The capacity to streamline proactively leads to the capacity to embrace super-globally.
We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our infinitely reconfigurable versioning but our power to innovate.
Without transparent, killer convergence, you will lack Total Quality Management.
A company that can brand courageously will (eventually) be able to target correctly.
What does the commonly-accepted term "synergistic" really mean?
At Adobe Connect, we have come to know how to benchmark efficiently.
We will deploy the aptitude of eyeballs to envisioneer.
It sounds astounding, but it's true!
Your budget for delivering should be at least three times your budget for harnessing.
A company that can incentivize faithfully will (at some point) be able to exploit defiantly.
Do you have a plan to become B2C?
We think that most transparent, B2B entry pages use far too much XSL, and not enough XSLT.
What do we facilitate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
We will optimize the aptitude of functionalities to aggregate.
Is it more important for something to be social-network-based or to be blog-based?