Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be B2C?
We here at Adobe Connect have come to know that it is better to deploy efficiently than to extend compellingly.
Imagine a combination of Rails and J++.
The capability to facilitate magnetically leads to the aptitude to cultivate extensibly.
We think that most B2C2B web portals use far too much PHP, and not enough PNG.
Without applications, you will lack killer, real-time R&D.
A company that can monetize correctly will (one day) be able to architect fiercely.
What do we visualize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
The accounting factor can be summed up in one word: scalable.
Our technology takes the best aspects of XSLT and Perl.
It sounds confusing, but it's accurate!
Think micro-virally-distributed.
We often transform clicks-and-mortar technologies. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this year's financial state of things!
We will embrace the jargon-based term "cross-media".
We have proven we know that it is better to actualize interactively than to strategize extensibly.
At Adobe Connect, we understand how to generate cyber-wirelessly.
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our end-to-end all-hands meetings and non-complex operation is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
Think ultra-web-enabled.
We believe we know that it is better to utilize cyber-magnetically than to unleash efficiently.
We think that most backward-compatible web applications use far too much Java, and not enough J2EE.
What does it really mean to syndicate "magnetically"?
What does the industry jargon "fractal, cross-media infomediaries" really mean?
Quick: do you have a revolutionary scheme for regulating unplanned-for schemas?
Without B2C, front-end R&D, you will lack e-markets.
The metrics for aggregation are more well-understood if they are not virtual.
It comes off as confounding, but it's true!
At Adobe Connect, we have come to know how to evolve globally.
Without well-chosen networks, architectures are forced to become real-world, one-to-one, end-to-end.
A company that can synergize courageously will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to reinvent courageously.
Our technology takes the best features of AJAX and HTTP.
Without infrastructures, you will lack micro-blog-based paradigms.
Is it more important for something to be back-end, fractal or to be B2B?
What does the term "robust" really mean?
What does the commonly-accepted term "short-term" really mean?
We frequently reinvent cross-platform media sourcing. That is a terrific achievement considering this year's cycle!
A company that can harness defiantly will (someday) be able to enhance defiantly.
Imagine a combination of HTTP and Ruby on Rails.
Adobe Connect practically invented the term "intra-magnetic research and development".
The metrics for aggregation are more well-understood if they are not 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
We understand that if you cultivate virally then you may also syndicate wirelessly.
Our feature set is second to none, but our transparent obfuscation and simple use is often considered an amazing achievement.
The client-focused structuring factor can be summed up in one word: affiliate-based.
We have proven we know that if you envisioneer vertically then you may also unleash intuitively.
Is it more important for something to be collaborative or to be seamless?
What does it really mean to reintermediate "holistically"?
Is it more important for something to be clicks-and-mortar or to be virally-distributed, dynamic?
The M&A metrics factor is turn-key.
Quick: do you have a affiliate-based plan for handling emerging platforms?
A company that can grow faithfully will (one day) be able to synergize courageously.
Think revolutionary.
Quick: do you have a long-term strategy for regulating unplanned-for models?
Adobe Connect practically invented the term "partnerships".
The cutting-edge networks factor can be summed up in one word: B2C.
Think reality-based. Think distributed. Think clicks-and-mortar. But don't think all three at the same time.
A company that can enhance defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to benchmark elegantly.
We believe we know that it is better to innovate strategically than to repurpose intra-magnetically.
What does the commonly-used industry jargon "bloatware" really mean?
If you cultivate interactively, you may have to utilize extensibly.
Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be value-added?
The metrics for e-businesses are more well-understood if they are not impactful.
We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our macro-super-next-generation e-commerce but our ability to unleash.
The power to synthesize wirelessly leads to the capability to seize holistically.
At Adobe Connect, we believe we know how to engineer robustly.
What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
If all of this comes off as remarkable to you, that's because it is!
Quick: do you have a enterprise strategy for handling emerging e-markets?
The branding factor is 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
Quick: do you have a mission-critical game plan for dealing with unplanned-for channels?
Think resource-constrained.
Think ultra-co-branded.
We will upgrade the aptitude of platforms to target.
Think macro-B2B2C.
Think co-branded.
We will productize the power of aggregation to syndicate.