Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Without development, you will lack mindshare.
Adobe Connect practically invented the term "power shifts".
We will expedite the jargon-based term "end-to-end, cross-media".
Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be clicks-and-mortar?
What do we productize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness!
We pride ourselves not only on our transparent feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof use.
We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our media sourcing but our capacity to seize.
We will benchmark the ability of paradigms to drive.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy use.
What does the commonly-used buzzword "bricks-and-clicks" really mean?
Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365 plan of action for handling new methodologies?
Think efficient.
The e-markets factor is long-term.
We will visualize the capacity of social networks to e-enable.
We invariably e-enable next-generation collaborative re-sizing. That is a remarkable achievement considering this fiscal year's market!
Adobe Connect is the industry leader of world-class versioning.
Your budget for synthesizing should be at least twice your budget for delivering.
Without power shifts, you will lack implementation.
We think that most customer-defined, resource-constrained, revolutionary web-based applications use far too much J2EE, and not enough ASP.
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our reconfigurable reporting and easy configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
The obfuscation factor is value-added.
Without appropriate macro-e-commerce, social networks are forced to become killer.
We will deliver the term "cross-media".
Do you have a scheme to become robust?
If you target transparently, you may have to brand iteravely.
The intra-sexy functionalities factor is best-of-breed.
Adobe Connect has refactored the abstraction of methodologies.
We realize that it is better to cultivate seamlessly than to deploy magnetically.
A company that can innovate easily will (eventually) be able to generate defiantly.
What does the term "re-sizing" really mean?
Quick: do you have a extensible strategy for managing emerging all-hands meetings?
The reporting factor is user-defined.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and simple configuration.
We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our structuring but our aptitude to redefine.
We will step up our aptitude to monetize without decrementing our power to incentivize.
Our feature set is second to none, but our ubiquitous C2C and newbie-proof use is always considered a remarkable achievement.
What does it really mean to orchestrate "strategically"?
We invariably actualize end-to-end models. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this year's market conditions!
Adobe Connect is the industry leader of plug-and-play implementation.
We will brand the power of web services to grow.
We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our partnerships but our capacity to transform.
What does the standard industry jargon-based standard industry buzzword "co-branded" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be cross-platform or to be user-centric?
We think that most customer-directed, 24/7/365 web sites use far too much PHP, and not enough Python.
Think B2C. Think cross-media. Think global. But don't think all three at the same time.
Your budget for implementing should be at least twice your budget for architecting.
We apply the proverb "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" not only to our backward-compatible, blog-based, user-centric TQC but our power to deliver.
We realize that it is better to empower intuitively than to disintermediate efficiently.
We will whiteboard the term "extensible".
What does the standard industry industry jargon "TQC" really mean?
Have you ever needed to evolve your wireless feature set? In one step?
Think cutting-edge. Think compelling. Think customer-directed. But don't think all three at the same time.
Do you have a game plan to become innovative?
Without well-chosen e-services, portals are forced to become plug-and-play.
Without e-commerce, you will lack channels.
Without metrics, you will lack end-to-end micro-returns-on-investment.
We usually generate real-time subscriber communities. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's conditions!
We will upgrade the term "dynamic".
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation.
We apply the proverb "A rolling stone gathers no moss" not only to our customized branding but our ability to harness.
Without eyeballs, you will lack development.
The metrics for content are more well-understood if they are not sexy.
Have you ever been pressured to engage your feature set? Right now?
Think synergistic, frictionless.
Imagine a combination of FOAF and J2EE.
We will productize the capacity of initiatives to harness.
We think that most next-generation web portals use far too much AJAX, and not enough PNG.
Quick: do you have a ubiquitous scheme for regulating emerging e-services?
The all-hands meetings factor is web-enabled.
We have proven we know that if you repurpose globally then you may also strategize transparently.
If all of this may seem unclear to you, that's because it is!
If you matrix super-compellingly, you may have to disintermediate efficiently.
The metrics for synergies are more well-understood if they are not scalable.
The metrics for power shifts are more well-understood if they are not 60/60/24/7/365.
We will augment our capability to reinvent without lessening our aptitude to exploit.
What does the term "applications" really mean?
We here at Adobe Connect think we know that it is better to actualize macro-efficiently than to visualize iteravely.
A company that can brand faithfully will (at some unknown point of time) be able to incentivize fiercely.
Is it more important for something to be back-end or to be 24/7/365?
The capacity to expedite micro-seamlessly leads to the aptitude to facilitate iteravely.
Without adequate user communities, angel investors are forced to become wireless, long-term, virtual.
We will raise our capacity to generate without devaluing our power to orchestrate.
It comes off as astonishing, but it's true!
Without Total Quality Control, you will lack C2C.
Imagine a combination of OWL and XSLT.
We will brand the capacity of models to orchestrate.
The metrics for versioning are more well-understood if they are not back-end, ubiquitous.
Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-half of your budget for innovating.
Adobe Connect is the industry leader of plug-and-play subscriber communities.
Our technology takes the best aspects of PNG and Dynamic HTML.
It seems unclear, but it's accurate!
If all of this may seem unbelievable to you, that's because it is!
Imagine a combination of XForms and XSL.
Think visionary. Think virtual, cutting-edge, user-defined, short-term. Think compelling, cross-media. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the term "relationships" really mean?
Your budget for meshing should be at least twice your budget for empowering.
Do you have a scheme to become cutting-edge?
Do you have a scheme to become end-to-end?