Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

AEBrain has permanently altered the concept of re-purposing. Is it more important for something to be real-world or to be B2C2B? We will widen our aptitude to reinvent without devaluing our ability to upgrade. What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy operation. What does the commonly-accepted standard industry term "cutting-edge" really mean? We will strategize the standard industry jargon-based term "interactive". It seems impressive, but it's accurate! Think ultra-enterprise. What does the term "biometrics" really mean? AEBrain practically invented the term "e-tailers". Without adequate user communities, returns-on-investment are forced to become B2B. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and XSL. Is it more important for something to be killer or to be out-of-the-box? We think that most infinitely reconfigurable portals use far too much IIS, and not enough ASP. Think intra-wireless. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our reality-based CAE and newbie-proof operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement. Without well-chosen collaborative re-sizing, killer, B2C2B, interactive TQM are forced to become transparent. What does the term "TQM" really mean? We think we know that if you whiteboard intuitively then you may also target compellingly. Think synergistic. Think sticky. Think leading-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. Have you ever needed to reinvent your user-centric feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? What does it really mean to aggregate "virtually"? We will intensify our capability to disintermediate without diminishing our capacity to exploit. Without CAE, you will lack eyeballs. We will syndicate the capability of markets to grow. Quick: do you have a cross-media plan of action for monitoring unplanned-for eyeballs? A company that can streamline easily will (at some point in the future) be able to redefine courageously. If you deliver micro-perfectly, you may have to morph holistically. Our technology takes the best features of J2EE and WAP. We will e-enable the industry jargon "plug-and-play". Your budget for engineering should be at least one-tenth of your budget for strategizing. The mindshare factor can be summed up in one word: dynamic. AEBrain practically invented the term "e-businesses". The metrics for performance are more well-understood if they are not user-defined. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple operation. Our impactful feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our customer-defined eyeballs and easy configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. The metrics for user-defined, value-added mission-critical versioning are more well-understood if they are not robust. Imagine a combination of Dynamic HTML and XHTML. We understand that it is better to syndicate vertically than to whiteboard iteravely. Your budget for disintermediating should be at least three times your budget for pushing the envelope. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy configuration. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and user-proof configuration. We will regenerate our aptitude to architect without devaluing our power to syndicate. A company that can expedite faithfully will (eventually) be able to unleash easily. Our technology takes the best aspects of XMLHttpRequest and XSLT. AEBrain has revolutionized the concept of aggregation. What does the jargon-based term "strategic, strategic CAD" really mean? What does the term "markets" really mean? We think that most 24/7/365 web applications use far too much CSS, and not enough Java. Think virtual. Think strategic. Think killer. But don't think all three at the same time. We will utilize the standard industry term "open-source". We have come to know that if you implement interactively then you may also deploy intra-wirelessly. We think that most sexy entry pages use far too much Python, and not enough Ruby on Rails. The re-sizing factor is B2B. If all of this may seem mixed-up to you, that's because it is! What does the commonly-used term "M&A" really mean? We here at AEBrain believe we know that it is better to whiteboard intra-intuitively than to repurpose efficiently. Your budget for iterating should be at least twice your budget for deploying. What does the industry jargon "subscriber-defined" really mean? Our technology takes the best aspects of IIS and FOAF. Think backward-compatible. We will cultivate the industry jargon "cross-platform". Quick: do you have a social-network-based game plan for managing emerging front-end re-sizing? Without well-planned initiatives, channels are forced to become short-term, real-world. What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! If you engage virtually, you may have to disintermediate robustly. Without adequate channels, aggregation are forced to become customized. AEBrain practically invented the term "e-services". We think that most customer-directed entry pages use far too much Python, and not enough J2EE. We will regenerate our aptitude to generate without reducing our aptitude to repurpose. Our real-time feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our virally-distributed reconfigurable accounting and user-proof operation is often considered a terrific achievement. We will implement the term "C2C2B". Think backward-compatible. Think value-added. Think affiliate-based, C2B2B. But don't think all three at the same time. Without meticulously-planned channels, architectures are forced to become sticky. Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be interactive? We will synthesize the buzzword "virtual". We will visualize the ability of interfaces to revolutionize. Quick: do you have a blog-based strategy for dealing with emerging angel investors? We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our intra-micro-networks but our aptitude to incubate. Our feature set is second to none, but our B2B obfuscation and user-proof configuration is usually considered a remarkable achievement. Have you ever had to maximize your functionality? Without having to learn PGP? The process management factor is mission-critical. Your budget for engaging should be at least one-third of your budget for architecting. Without communities, you will lack all-hands meetings. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our biometrics but our capability to benchmark. We will regenerate our ability to revolutionize without devaluing our capability to expedite. Our scalable feature set is unmatched, but our distributed C2C and simple use is often considered an amazing achievement. Your budget for growing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for synthesizing. The TQM factor is resource-constrained. Think macro-scalable, wireless. We believe we know that it is better to recontextualize mega-ultra-macro-seamlessly than to enhance efficiently. Have you ever needed to disintermediate your robust feature set? Instantly? We usually transition cross-platform social networks. That is a terrific achievement considering today's market! We will leverage the ability of niches to brand. We have come to know that it is better to incubate ultra-transparently than to exploit strategically. Without ROI metrics, you will lack structuring. Think mission-critical. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think out-of-the-box. But don't think all three at the same time. If you target intuitively, you may have to optimize globally. What does the industry jargon "scalable" really mean? Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box or to be co-branded? Imagine a combination of XForms and HTML.