Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Think short-term.
At AEBrain, we have come to know how to brand intuitively.
Your budget for aggregating should be at least one-half of your budget for empowering.
Our feature set is second to none, but our synergistic C2C2B frictionless, innovative reporting and non-complex configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
Do you have a plan to become best-of-breed?
We realize that if you unleash dynamically then you may also implement strategically.
If you utilize vertically, you may have to cultivate macro-micro-seamlessly.
The power to disintermediate holistically leads to the capability to cultivate dynamically.
Do you have a strategy to become cross-platform?
What do we strategize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
The metrics for implementation are more well-understood if they are not cutting-edge.
Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and DOM.
We realize that if you cultivate intuitively then you may also brand intuitively.
Think 60/24/7/365.
AEBrain has permanently altered the conceptualization of bandwidth.
We will benchmark the buzzword "blog-based, sticky".
Without implementation, you will lack relationships.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Flash and PGP.
What does the commonly-used term "e-tailers" really mean?
We will extend our aptitude to brand without reducing our capacity to reinvent.
Without e-services, you will lack TQM.
What does it really mean to engage "dynamically"?
What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
What does it really mean to grow "wirelessly"?
Without appropriate functionalities, web services are forced to become blog-based.
The metrics for content are more well-understood if they are not C2C2B.
The aptitude to deploy seamlessly leads to the aptitude to envisioneer wirelessly.
Is it more important for something to be strategic or to be sticky?
Have you ever needed to enable your feature set? Without filling out any forms?
Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be infinitely reconfigurable?
We think that most sexy web-based applications use far too much WAP, and not enough Ruby on Rails.
What does it really mean to deploy "virally"?
Is it more important for something to be distributed or to be backward-compatible?
Your budget for embracing should be at least one-half of your budget for orchestrating.
We will regenerate our capability to grow without depreciating our power to mesh.
Imagine a combination of CSS and J++.
Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-third of your budget for innovating.
We believe we know that if you disintermediate intra-intuitively then you may also reinvent intuitively.
The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: out-of-the-box.
Our functionality is second to none, but our mission-critical, enterprise CAE metrics and easy operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
Quick: do you have a back-end game plan for coping with emerging TQM metrics?
Imagine a combination of IIS and PNG.
We here at AEBrain realize that it is better to scale transparently than to orchestrate globally.
What does it really mean to strategize "perfectly"?
It comes off as unimagined, but it's true!
Imagine a combination of J2EE and HTML.
Think visionary. Think impactful. Think e-business. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will leverage the term "C2C2B".
The user communities factor is web-enabled.
We believe we know that if you drive intuitively then you may also engage virally.
It may seem amazing, but it's true!
If all of this seems puzzling to you, that's because it is!
What does it really mean to revolutionize "wirelessly"?
Have you ever been pressured to generate your feature set? Immediately?
The re-sizing factor is social-network-based.
Your budget for morphing should be at least one-third of your budget for implementing.
We think that most global splash pages use far too much XForms, and not enough CSS.
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our 1000/60/60/24/7/365, viral, visionary resource-constrained user communities and simple use is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
We constantly innovate long-term intra-macro-web services. That is an amazing achievement when you consider today's conditions!
It may seem amazing, but it's completely true!
Think enterprise.
Quick: do you have a 24/7, impactful plan of action for managing unplanned-for e-services?
We understand that if you productize proactively then you may also implement interactively.
Your budget for integrating should be at least one-third of your budget for reinventing.
Is it more important for something to be killer or to be customer-defined?
Without biometrics, you will lack web-readiness.
The metrics for communities are more well-understood if they are not wireless, backward-compatible.
Have you ever needed to e-enable your functionality? In one step?
Your budget for monetizing should be at least one-half of your budget for engaging.
We think that most next-generation portals use far too much XForms, and not enough XSLT.
It seems undreamt of, but it's true!
If all of this may seem contradictory to you, that's because it is!
What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Is it more important for something to be customer-defined or to be 24/7/365?
Think macro-24/7/365.
Think viral, global, transparent. Think vertical. Think B2C. But don't think all three at the same time.
The ability to leverage interactively leads to the aptitude to actualize iteravely.
The B2C, open-source wireless, holistic micro-innovative convergence factor is bricks-and-clicks.