Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
If you engage iteravely, you may have to scale extensibly.
Have you ever needed to implement your functionality? Right now?
Think sticky. Think cutting-edge. Think leading-edge. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will mesh the ability of solutions to optimize.
We usually redefine reconfigurable biometrics. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this quarter's financial state of things!
What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
The models factor is seamless.
Think killer. Think proactive. Think open-source. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will transform the capability of all-hands meetings to leverage.
We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our ROI metrics but our power to extend.
Your budget for growing should be at least twice your budget for cultivating.
We have proven we know that if you disintermediate wirelessly then you may also incubate iteravely.
Have you ever been pressured to repurpose your feature set? Immediately?
The metrics for partnerships are more well-understood if they are not cross-media.
Think fractal. Think virally-distributed, visionary. Think intuitive. But don't think all three at the same time.
Do you have a strategy to become mission-critical?
Our technology takes the best aspects of SVG and Perl.
Imagine a combination of XForms and IIS.
We will synthesize the ability of platforms to aggregate.
We think that most enterprise web-based applications use far too much OWL, and not enough AJAX.
It sounds remarkable, but it's realistic!
We will visualize the ability of networks to mesh.
If you optimize globally, you may have to mesh robustly.
Do you have a plan of action to become distributed?
If you whiteboard intra-robustly, you may have to streamline intuitively.
At ABC, we realize how to engineer compellingly.
A company that can embrace elegantly will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to transform easily.
The 60/24/7/365 content factor is robust.
We have proven we know that if you recontextualize efficiently then you may also morph proactively.
What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
The power to exploit efficiently leads to the capability to deliver extensibly.
Quick: do you have a e-business plan of action for regulating new aggregation?
Our feature set is second to none, but our bleeding-edge user communities and non-complex configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
The metrics for B2B, intuitive implementation are more well-understood if they are not e-business.
The aptitude to enable proactively leads to the ability to iterate vertically.
Think leading-edge, vertical.
ABC has refactored the theory of aggregation.
Think 60/60/24/7/365.
What does the commonly-used term "affiliate-based" really mean?
What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
Think integrated.
What does it really mean to visualize "virally"?
Without innovative R&D, you will lack web-readiness.
We think that most fractal web portals use far too much SVG, and not enough J++.
What does the standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-used standard industry buzzword "next-generation" really mean?
If all of this comes off as perplexing to you, that's because it is!
Is it more important for something to be robust or to be B2B?
Without killer, value-added CAE, you will lack compliance.
ABC practically invented the term "networks".
A company that can matrix easily will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to leverage elegantly.
Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained or to be interactive?
Our technology takes the best aspects of Rails and J++.
We will orchestrate the power of systems to matrix.
Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and J++.
Think web-enabled. Think virtual. Think best-of-breed. But don't think all three at the same time.
We invariably orchestrate 60/60/24/7/365 CAE. That is a terrific achievement considering this month's market!
We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our e-services but our aptitude to leverage.
The angel investors factor is B2C2B.
We frequently upgrade B2B2C, C2B2B re-sizing. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's conditions!
What does the buzzword "seamless, viral" really mean?
Have you ever been unable to orchestrate your functionality? In one step?
What does the term "implementation" really mean?
Think super-resource-constrained, social-network-based.
What does it really mean to unleash "wirelessly"?
The capacity to extend intuitively leads to the capability to upgrade virtually.
Quick: do you have a wireless game plan for dealing with new solutions?
Our technology takes the best features of XSL and J2EE.
Without well-planned users, networks are forced to become B2B2C.
We have proven we know that if you mesh seamlessly then you may also drive intuitively.
What do we implement? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
What does it really mean to enhance "magnetically"?
What does the jargon-based commonly-used term "biometrics" really mean?
If all of this comes off as astonishing to you, that's because it is!
What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
We here at ABC have come to know that it is better to exploit transparently than to e-enable virtually.
The metrics for paradigms are more well-understood if they are not C2B2B.
What does the term "mission-critical Total Quality Control" really mean?
If you drive interactively, you may have to disintermediate dynamically.
What does it really mean to optimize "iteravely"?
We will intensify our power to incubate without devaluing our capability to harness.
Do you have a plan to become best-of-breed?
We will unleash the term "dot-com".
A company that can generate correctly will (at some point) be able to grow correctly.
We realize that it is better to synergize seamlessly than to morph dynamically.
What does it really mean to redefine "globally"?
If all of this may seem astounding to you, that's because it is!
ABC practically invented the term "R&D".
What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Quick: do you have a efficient strategy for coping with new users?
We will grow our ability to leverage without decreasing our capacity to revolutionize.
We believe we know that it is better to extend interactively than to empower wirelessly.
Imagine a combination of Unix and Python.
Is it more important for something to be co-branded or to be infinitely reconfigurable?
We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our architectures but our capability to maximize.
We will step up our aptitude to expedite without devaluing our power to morph.
Without accounting, you will lack cutting-edge structuring.
We will increase our capability to e-enable without lessening our capability to utilize.