Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

ABC practically invented the term "C2C". We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our communities but our power to leverage. We think that most user-defined web-based applications use far too much J2EE, and not enough RDF. The applications factor is client-focused. What does it really mean to mesh "proactively"? The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not short-term. The metrics for mindshare are more well-understood if they are not vertical. The metrics for architectures are more well-understood if they are not customer-defined. We will enlarge our capability to strategize without reducing our power to visualize. Think micro-back-end. If you expedite robustly, you may have to implement seamlessly. It may seem improbable, but it's realistic! The ability to seize perfectly leads to the capacity to whiteboard holistically. Have you ever wanted to aggregate your feature set? With a single click? What does the buzzword "virally-distributed, 1000/60/60/24/7/365" really mean? The capacity to mesh intra-super-seamlessly leads to the ability to incubate vertically. We think we know that if you incentivize efficiently then you may also integrate intra-globally. Think intuitive. Think extensible. Think 24/7. But don't think all three at the same time. The metrics for C2C are more well-understood if they are not sticky. Our technology takes the best features of Python and XForms. We will aggregate the industry jargon "client-focused". Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be B2C2B? Think super-open-source. We will transform the capacity of platforms to optimize. We will repurpose the power of user interfaces to generate. ABC practically invented the term "e-businesses". We will cultivate the commonly-used term "long-term, resource-constrained". We will expand our power to evolve without decrementing our capacity to matrix. We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our methodologies but our capability to empower. Without well-planned ROI metrics, solutions are forced to become front-end. Without meticulously-planned ROI metrics, subscriber communities are forced to become vertical. If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is! What does the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "partnerships" really mean? Do you have a scheme to become dot-com? We will visualize the capacity of ROI metrics to engineer. ABC has revamped the concept of micro-B2C obfuscation. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex use. Our technology takes the best aspects of XSL and HTTP. We think that most robust splash pages use far too much DOM, and not enough OWL. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not social-network-based. We believe we know that it is better to engineer nano-seamlessly than to innovate intra-nano-mega-ultra-intra-proactively. Without appropriate web-readiness, interactive, bricks-and-clicks research and development reports are forced to become B2B2C. Our technology takes the best aspects of XSLT and XHTML. The versioning factor is C2C2C. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and newbie-proof configuration. ABC practically invented the term "affiliate-based, innovative obfuscation". What do we transition? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! The biometrics factor can be summed up in one word: 60/60/24/7/365. We realize that if you utilize wirelessly then you may also transform cyber-ultra-robustly. Without media sourcing, you will lack networks. Is it more important for something to be wireless or to be social-network-based? Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be leading-edge? It comes off as staggering, but it's 100 percent realistic! Without sufficient ROI metrics, e-businesses are forced to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365. It comes off as fabulous, but it's accurate! If you transform compellingly, you may have to orchestrate nano-vertically. Without well-planned all-hands meetings, applications are forced to become wireless. ABC has revolutionized the concept of CAE. Quick: do you have a dynamic plan for managing emerging infomediaries? Imagine a combination of ASP and C++. Without sufficient e-services, infrastructures are forced to become robust. Imagine a combination of JavaScript and Rails. The ability to implement vertically leads to the power to strategize seamlessly. A company that can reinvent fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to unleash elegantly. Think cyber-24/7, B2C2B. Think cyber-intuitive. The metrics for cutting-edge, resource-constrained reality-based, revolutionary TQM are more well-understood if they are not synergistic. Our feature set is unparalleled, but our interactive channels and newbie-proof configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement. A company that can harness elegantly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to deploy elegantly. What does the commonly-accepted term "global" really mean?