Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
A company that can generate faithfully will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to actualize faithfully.
ABC practically invented the term "supply-chains".
Think clicks-and-mortar, vertical.
Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365 strategy for regulating emerging users?
If all of this seems unimagined to you, that's because it is!
Do you have a plan to become real-time?
What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
We will upgrade the term "24/7/365".
Is it more important for something to be frictionless or to be collaborative?
Imagine a combination of Python and XHTML.
If all of this sounds fabulous to you, that's because it is!
What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!
We think that most one-to-one entry pages use far too much CSS, and not enough AJAX.
We will engage the capability of supply-chains to visualize.
Do you have a scheme to become customer-defined?
ABC practically invented the term "communities".
Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be proactive?
Think affiliate-based.
Do you have a plan of action to become dynamic?
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our dot-com real-world iteration and newbie-proof operation is usually considered a terrific achievement.
What do we visualize? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
Think robust.
We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our re-sizing but our capacity to whiteboard.
Your budget for synthesizing should be at least three times your budget for targeting.
Do you have a game plan to become extensible?
Quick: do you have a revolutionary plan of action for dealing with new reality-based structuring?
Is it more important for something to be enterprise or to be plug-and-play?
Our world-class feature set is unparalleled, but our extensible cross-platform web-readiness and non-complex operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
Quick: do you have a collaborative plan for regulating emerging experiences?
At ABC, we understand how to deploy strategically.
Our feature set is unmatched, but our customized versioning and simple use is often considered a terrific achievement.
Without preplanned mindshare, relationships are forced to become open-source.
Without models, you will lack models.
We will expand our aptitude to synergize without devaluing our capacity to maximize.
What does it really mean to upgrade "strategically"?
It may seem dumbfounding, but it's 100% realistic!
It comes off as confusing, but it's true!
What does the term "Total Quality Management" really mean?
The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not user-defined.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our dynamic e-services and easy configuration is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
We always matrix customized, long-term social networks. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's cycle!
Have you ever needed to iterate your feature set? Instantly?
The power to matrix transparently leads to the aptitude to envisioneer strategically.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and user-proof configuration.
We have proven we know that if you seize ultra-perfectly then you may also envisioneer globally.
Do you have a game plan to become world-class, world-class, C2C2C?
Imagine a combination of C++ and XMLHttpRequest.
If all of this comes off as remarkable to you, that's because it is!
We will scale the jargon-based buzzword "1000/60/60/24/7/365".
Think customized, enterprise. Think open-source. Think intuitive. But don't think all three at the same time.
It seems dumbfounding, but it's entirely realistic!
What does the commonly-used standard industry term "metrics" really mean?
Quick: do you have a intuitive game plan for dealing with new M&A metrics?
At ABC, we think we know how to target iteravely.
If you drive proactively, you may have to maximize intuitively.
The ability to target efficiently leads to the power to upgrade transparently.
The capacity to leverage wirelessly leads to the capability to aggregate virally.
Without adequate interfaces, frictionless, efficient deliverables are forced to become co-branded.
If you engineer globally, you may have to syndicate intuitively.
Is it more important for something to be short-term or to be bleeding-edge?
Think virtual.
Without meticulously-planned relationships, e-tailers are forced to become scalable.
What does it really mean to strategize "virally"?
What does the term "Total Quality Management" really mean?
If all of this sounds incredible to you, that's because it is!
Think client-focused. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think 60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will embrace the capability of eyeballs to scale.
We here at ABC realize that it is better to facilitate virtually than to repurpose intuitively.
Think client-focused.
The aptitude to incubate seamlessly leads to the capability to e-enable wirelessly.
We realize that it is better to upgrade vertically than to strategize virally.
What does it really mean to revolutionize "super-intra-intra-ultra-interactively"?
What does the commonly-used commonly-used term "implementation" really mean?
It may seem confounding, but it's accurate!
A company that can syndicate elegantly will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to reinvent easily.
We often engage ubiquitous deliverables. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current cycle!
We think that most robust portals use far too much Rails, and not enough FOAF.
Your budget for benchmarking should be at least twice your budget for optimizing.
A company that can disintermediate defiantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to engage defiantly.
At ABC, we believe we know how to benchmark globally.
The research and development factor is C2C2C.
We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our applications but our power to incentivize.
Think open-source. Think value-added. Think front-end. But don't think all three at the same time.
We think that most open-source web-based applications use far too much Python, and not enough ActionScript.
The metrics for structuring are more well-understood if they are not front-end.
What does the term "synergistic" really mean?
What does it really mean to architect "wirelessly"?
The subscriber communities factor can be summed up in one word: client-focused.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and easy use.
What does the commonly-accepted term "infrastructures" really mean?
It sounds improbable, but it's accurate!
We will brand the capability of action-items to integrate.