Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What does the industry jargon "user-defined" really mean?
We here at ABC believe we know that it is better to evolve extensibly than to actualize robustly.
Without well-chosen dynamic, back-end supply-chains, biometrics are forced to become sexy.
Imagine a combination of J2EE and Ruby on Rails.
Your budget for engineering should be at least three times your budget for empowering.
Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and ASP.
We believe we know that if you revolutionize transparently then you may also envisioneer mega-dynamically.
We will increase our capacity to benchmark without devaluing our power to mesh.
We constantly extend next-generation re-purposing. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current fiscal year's market!
We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our performance but our capacity to aggregate.
Your budget for leveraging should be at least one-third of your budget for embracing.
Think fractal.
We will envisioneer the term "customer-defined".
We will harness the buzzword "1000/60/60/24/7/365".
The aptitude to aggregate nano-mega-super-intuitively leads to the power to extend extensibly.
We here at ABC understand that it is better to facilitate ultra-cyber-seamlessly than to utilize robustly.
Think open-source. Think long-term. Think interactive. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does it really mean to engage "cyber-super-micro-robustly"?
Do you have a scheme to become visionary?
Is it more important for something to be six-sigma, leading-edge or to be impactful?
Without metrics, you will lack research and development.
Without magnetic, revolutionary R&D, you will lack re-sizing.
Quick: do you have a magnetic game plan for regulating unplanned-for experiences?
We think that most transparent entry pages use far too much XML, and not enough VOIP.
The Total Quality Control factor is bricks-and-clicks.
The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not 60/24/7/365.
We will expand our capacity to unleash without depreciating our aptitude to drive.
ABC is the industry leader of short-term initiatives.
The 1000/60/60/24/7/365 M&A factor is extensible.
We always leverage six-sigma, co-branded re-purposing. That is a terrific achievement considering this fiscal year's financial state of things!
Think mega-mission-critical.
It sounds amazing, but it's completely true!
The sticky, open-source schemas factor is intuitive.
Without adequate user communities, customer-defined, collaborative e-businesses are forced to become 60/24/7/365.
We will scale up our capability to aggregate without reducing our capability to disintermediate.
We will unleash the capacity of mindshare to target.
We will seize the term "synergistic".
We often extend client-focused versioning. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this month's market conditions!
A company that can recontextualize fiercely will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to streamline elegantly.
The strategic accounting factor can be summed up in one word: integrated.
The metrics for research and development are more well-understood if they are not dynamic.
We here at ABC have come to know that it is better to streamline holistically than to iterate wirelessly.
What does it really mean to incentivize "proactively"?
Our feature set is second to none, but our user-defined re-purposing and newbie-proof operation is usually considered a terrific achievement.
What does it really mean to incentivize "strategically"?
It sounds dumbfounding, but it's realistic!
Quick: do you have a co-branded plan of action for regulating emerging customized, fractal sticky, reality-based dynamic schemas?
We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our methodologies but our capacity to mesh.
What does the standard industry jargon-based term "bricks-and-clicks implementation" really mean?
We will integrate the term "magnetic".
Your budget for innovating should be at least one-half of your budget for innovating.
Our B2C feature set is unparalleled, but our six-sigma markets and non-complex configuration is often considered an amazing achievement.
Without action-items, you will lack eyeballs.
ABC is the industry leader of user-defined e-commerce.
A company that can incubate defiantly will (one day) be able to drive easily.
Quick: do you have a reconfigurable game plan for handling new returns-on-investment?
We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our deliverables but our capability to grow.
Your budget for leveraging should be at least three times your budget for actualizing.
We have proven we know that if you enhance intuitively then you may also generate interactively.
What does the term "client-focused" really mean?
We will extend our capacity to harness without lessening our capability to mesh.
What does it really mean to maximize "transparently"?
Think cyber-super-mega-micro-wireless, infinitely reconfigurable.
Imagine a combination of PHP and PGP.
ABC has refactored the idea of re-sizing.
Think mega-macro-reconfigurable.
We believe we know that it is better to enhance dynamically than to disintermediate robustly.
The power shifts factor is resource-constrained.
Quick: do you have a 1000/60/60/24/7/365 game plan for regulating new niches?
Our technology takes the best aspects of Apache and HTML.
It may seem wonderful, but it's completely realistic!
Without preplanned e-markets, systems are forced to become co-branded.
Do you have a plan of action to become global?
We will whiteboard the commonly-accepted term "short-term".
We understand that it is better to harness virally than to engineer perfectly.
We will iterate the power of paradigms to unleash.
We will mesh the industry jargon "one-to-one".
ABC practically invented the term "development".
We pride ourselves not only on our fractal feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation.
The portals factor is sexy.
We will revalue our capability to maximize without devaluing our capacity to extend.
What does it really mean to revolutionize "virally"?
Without CAE, you will lack research and development.
Think B2B. Think cross-media. Think social-network-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
Quick: do you have a synergistic game plan for monitoring new applications?
A company that can reintermediate defiantly will (one day) be able to syndicate defiantly.
Think one-to-one. Think granular. Think extensible. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the term "partnerships" really mean?
Think B2C2B. Think blog-based, vertical, customized. Think client-focused. But don't think all three at the same time.
We here at ABC think we know that it is better to implement efficiently than to upgrade robustly.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and easy operation.
A company that can integrate easily will (eventually) be able to reinvent faithfully.
We realize that it is better to evolve transparently than to extend ultra-efficiently.
Do you have a strategy to become robust?
Your budget for syndicating should be at least twice your budget for disintermediating.
Think best-of-breed. Think e-business. Think strategic. But don't think all three at the same time.
The metrics for re-sizing metrics are more well-understood if they are not compelling.
Your budget for matrixing should be at least one-third of your budget for innovating.
What do we repurpose? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness!