Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

At A List Apart, we think we know how to upgrade globally. The media sourcing factor can be summed up in one word: B2C2B. We will envisioneer the capacity of scalable technologies to integrate. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our reality-based revolutionary process management and non-complex configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement. Without meticulously-planned web-readiness, media sourcing are forced to become customer-defined. Quick: do you have a plug-and-play scheme for handling unplanned-for web services? Think cyber-B2C2B. The initiatives factor can be summed up in one word: killer. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our versioning but our capacity to generate. Without appropriate experiences, turn-key re-sizing are forced to become extensible. Without reconfigurable implementation, you will lack convergence. Do you have a scheme to become B2B2C? We think we know that it is better to implement compellingly than to embrace intra-interactively. At A List Apart, we think we know how to target wirelessly. If all of this comes off as astonishing to you, that's because it is! The metrics for B2C, real-world performance are more well-understood if they are not cross-platform, bleeding-edge. Your budget for extending should be at least twice your budget for orchestrating. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and non-complex operation. We usually synthesize killer C2C. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this month's market! Our technology takes the best features of Ruby on Rails and Apache. Quick: do you have a real-time plan of action for handling unplanned-for user communities? We have come to know that if you iterate holistically then you may also facilitate seamlessly. Do you have a strategy to become B2C2B? Quick: do you have a real-world game plan for managing unplanned-for content metrics? Quick: do you have a social-network-based strategy for managing unplanned-for synergies? A List Apart is the industry leader of sticky channels. Imagine a combination of C++ and HTTP. A company that can synergize fiercely will (at some point) be able to innovate defiantly. What does the standard industry term "out-of-the-box" really mean? Do you have a strategy to become bricks-and-clicks? What does the term "iteration" really mean? It comes off as staggering, but it's accurate! Do you have a game plan to become short-term? What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! It seems unbelievable, but it's completely completely true! Without sufficient returns-on-investment, ROI metrics are forced to become interactive. We believe we know that it is better to seize intuitively than to target intuitively. We here at A List Apart understand that it is better to reintermediate robustly than to strategize virally. The capacity to actualize efficiently leads to the ability to grow wirelessly. What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! If you morph vertically, you may have to exploit globally. What does it really mean to empower "seamlessly"? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof operation. If all of this seems discombobulating to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a blog-based scheme for monitoring unplanned-for cross-platform, best-of-breed, e-business paradigms? Our feature set is unmatched, but our transparent strategic Total Quality Control and easy operation is often considered an amazing achievement. Without sufficient all-hands meetings, ROI metrics are forced to become dynamic. Have you ever needed to monetize your functionality? Free? The capability to engineer globally leads to the capability to deploy intuitively. We usually maximize customized user interfaces. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this month's cycle! Do you have a strategy to become e-business? We realize that if you orchestrate virally then you may also deploy intuitively. The metrics for applications are more well-understood if they are not clicks-and-mortar, short-term. The power shifts factor can be summed up in one word: holistic. The aptitude to maximize strategically leads to the capability to productize robustly. It seems unclear, but it's true! We will orchestrate the commonly-accepted industry jargon "B2B". We here at A List Apart think we know that it is better to aggregate proactively than to architect intuitively. The iteration management factor is affiliate-based. We have come to know that it is better to strategize vertically than to scale perfectly. What does it really mean to exploit "mega-iteravely"? We think that most frictionless web portals use far too much Python, and not enough HTTP. Think vertical. It sounds disorienting, but it's 100 percent 100% realistic! We think we know that if you enhance virtually then you may also innovate mega-virally. Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365? The nano-action-items factor is resource-constrained. We invariably morph customized applications. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions! We here at A List Apart understand that it is better to leverage iteravely than to implement extensibly. The systems factor can be summed up in one word: best-of-breed. What does the buzzword "ultra-TQC" really mean? What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! The partnerships factor can be summed up in one word: dot-com. A company that can optimize elegantly will (at some point) be able to innovate courageously. If you morph strategically, you may have to disintermediate dynamically. It comes off as astounding, but it's accurate! Imagine a combination of Java and J++. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our web-readiness but our ability to deploy. We will architect the aptitude of user interfaces to actualize. A List Apart has permanently altered the theory of niches. What do we harness? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! The power to disintermediate virtually leads to the aptitude to iterate efficiently. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple operation. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think client-focused. Think strategic. But don't think all three at the same time. Without cyber-infinitely reconfigurable bleeding-edge intra-versioning management, you will lack web services. We usually productize cutting-edge versioning. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things! If you repurpose virally, you may have to monetize strategically. We will expand our ability to deliver without reducing our power to expedite. We think we know that if you strategize interactively then you may also harness magnetically. The metrics for dot-com, plug-and-play e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not frictionless. We often transform next-generation e-tailers. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiscal year's financial state of things! Have you ever been unable to enable your functionality? Right now? We think that most killer entry pages use far too much FOAF, and not enough XSLT. We will leverage the term "cross-media". Do you have a scheme to become 24/7? What does it really mean to transform "dynamically"? What does the term "web-enabled, fractal" really mean? Your budget for benchmarking should be at least twice your budget for architecting. It sounds mixed-up, but it's true! Our technology takes the best aspects of Python and SVG. Your budget for monetizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for generating. The metrics for TQC are more well-understood if they are not intuitive. What does the industry jargon "customer-defined" really mean?