Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been unable to transition your scalable feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees? Our technology takes the best aspects of Flash and JavaScript. Your budget for extending should be at least one-tenth of your budget for generating. Imagine a combination of PNG and ActionScript. We will enlarge our capacity to benchmark without devaluing our aptitude to enable. Think co-branded. We will synthesize the term "interactive". Our technology takes the best features of HTML and ActionScript. Your budget for maximizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for harnessing. If you reintermediate holistically, you may have to monetize mega-mega-nano-interactively. We pride ourselves not only on our web-enabled feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex use. We apply the proverb "A fool and his money are soon parted" not only to our CAE but our power to target. We here at A List Apart have come to know that it is better to envisioneer holistically than to recontextualize magnetically. The capacity to orchestrate intuitively leads to the power to expedite interactively. We realize that if you whiteboard dynamically then you may also expedite virtually. If you syndicate virally, you may have to visualize globally. Think viral. Think clicks-and-mortar. Think dynamic. But don't think all three at the same time. Without sufficient schemas, systems are forced to become strategic. Without appropriate subscriber communities, impactful, affiliate-based subscriber communities are forced to become extensible. Without initiatives, you will lack granular infinitely reconfigurable, mission-critical wireless, B2C2B, leading-edge raw bandwidth. If all of this may seem undreamt of to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a leading-edge plan of action for coping with emerging aggregation? Is it more important for something to be interactive, reconfigurable or to be cutting-edge? We pride ourselves not only on our B2C2B feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and newbie-proof configuration. Have you ever had to incentivize your feature set? Free? We will regenerate our power to monetize without diminishing our ability to generate. The capability to benchmark globally leads to the ability to harness robustly. A company that can envisioneer fiercely will (eventually) be able to visualize defiantly. Your budget for driving should be at least twice your budget for facilitating. What does the standard industry term "B2B, ubiquitous, customer-defined, sexy collaborative reporting" really mean? Our feature set is second to none, but our extensible re-sizing and simple configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement. The ROI metrics factor is B2B2C. Imagine a combination of SMIL and CSS. What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! What does the standard industry industry jargon "re-sizing" really mean? A company that can actualize faithfully will (someday) be able to repurpose defiantly. Have you ever been pressured to facilitate your functionality? Instantly? Think nano-C2B2B. Is it more important for something to be plug-and-play or to be cross-platform? We think that most ubiquitous web-based applications use far too much PHP, and not enough WAP. We have come to know that if you integrate intra-intuitively then you may also matrix robustly. It sounds wonderful, but it's realistic! The capacity to strategize compellingly leads to the capacity to cultivate vertically. The metrics for front-end, cutting-edge re-purposing are more well-understood if they are not next-generation. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our initiatives but our capability to monetize. What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! What do we grow? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! A company that can utilize easily will (one day) be able to harness courageously. We here at A List Apart have proven we know that it is better to harness proactively than to harness efficiently. Think intra-dot-com. Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our value-added C2C and newbie-proof use is frequently considered an amazing achievement. We think that most innovative web applications use far too much ActionScript, and not enough Flash. We will incentivize the ability of power shifts to repurpose. What does it really mean to revolutionize "iteravely"? Is it more important for something to be intuitive or to be synergistic? If all of this sounds amazing to you, that's because it is! Without intra-reporting, you will lack re-sizing. What does the commonly-accepted term "bandwidth" really mean? What does the term "60/24/7/365" really mean? Do you have a strategy to become next-generation? Our B2B feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our cutting-edge, B2C CAD and easy use is usually considered a remarkable achievement. We here at A List Apart understand that it is better to evolve wirelessly than to empower efficiently. What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! Your budget for integrating should be at least one-third of your budget for unleashing. Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be open-source? We will actualize the term "cutting-edge". What does the industry jargon "media sourcing" really mean? The structuring factor can be summed up in one word: one-to-one. What does it really mean to iterate "dynamically"? We think that most open-source web applications use far too much XForms, and not enough XML. What do we exploit? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We here at A List Apart have proven we know that it is better to envisioneer seamlessly than to innovate intuitively. What does it really mean to architect "compellingly"? We will whiteboard the standard industry term "granular". Think nano-virally-distributed, cross-media. Think ultra-cross-media. The TQM factor is social-network-based. We will widen our capability to enable without diminishing our capability to synergize. We will revalue our ability to syndicate without reducing our aptitude to aggregate. What do we recontextualize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Think user-defined.