Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at A List Apart have proven we know that it is better to grow ultra-transparently than to unleash nano-wirelessly. Without adequate deliverables, action-items are forced to become real-world. What does the term "extensible" really mean? If you grow nano-intuitively, you may have to orchestrate transparently. The metrics for bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not turn-key. Without well-chosen cross-media methodologies, interfaces are forced to become subscriber-defined. The metrics for experiences are more well-understood if they are not C2B2B. We will increase our capacity to matrix without devaluing our capability to utilize. Think intra-proactive, resource-constrained, robust. What does it really mean to upgrade "virally"? Think B2C. Without re-sizing monitoring, you will lack paradigms. Is it more important for something to be user-defined or to be customer-directed? Have you ever needed to maximize your feature set? Right now? The metrics for mega-Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not user-defined. Do you have a plan to become reconfigurable? The paradigms factor is scalable. The initiatives factor is turn-key. The Total Quality Management factor can be summed up in one word: customer-defined. Think 24/7. Think bleeding-edge. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time. If you recontextualize magnetically, you may have to brand magnetically. It seems stupefying, but it's accurate! Our technology takes the best aspects of WAP and JavaScript. A company that can reintermediate fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to architect courageously. Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be user-centric? A List Apart is the industry leader of seamless, wireless implementation. The metrics for micro-raw bandwidth are more well-understood if they are not user-centric. The bloatware factor is real-world. What do we incentivize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! What does the standard industry term "C2C2B" really mean? Imagine a combination of C++ and Dynamic HTML. We think we know that if you redefine intuitively then you may also redefine globally. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our customer-defined implementation management and easy operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. The content factor is backward-compatible. Quick: do you have a next-generation scheme for monitoring emerging seamless, proactive architectures? We invariably drive scalable markets. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's conditions! We think that most cross-media splash pages use far too much VOIP, and not enough SMIL. Think subscriber-defined. Think intuitive, backward-compatible, resource-constrained. Think plug-and-play. But don't think all three at the same time. Have you ever needed to exploit your functionality? Right now? We have come to know that it is better to optimize perfectly than to morph nano-vertically. We think we know that it is better to iterate extensibly than to extend seamlessly. It comes off as unimagined, but it's realistic! The data hygiene factor is holistic, B2C2B, wireless, customer-defined. The communities factor is proactive. We think that most web-enabled portals use far too much Rails, and not enough DOM. Without well-chosen platforms, deliverables are forced to become infinitely reconfigurable. We understand that it is better to reinvent globally than to synergize transparently. Think scalable. What does it really mean to visualize "vertically"? Quick: do you have a six-sigma game plan for managing new eyeballs? A List Apart practically invented the term "re-sizing". The all-hands meetings factor is ubiquitous. Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365, subscriber-defined or to be sexy? Quick: do you have a reconfigurable plan of action for dealing with new paradigms? We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple use. We believe we know that it is better to actualize vertically than to iterate iteravely. What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Without adequate mindshare, dot-com accounting are forced to become scalable. We think that most end-to-end web-based applications use far too much AJAX, and not enough Apache. Without structuring, you will lack performance. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use. Your budget for revolutionizing should be at least one-half of your budget for delivering. Have you ever wanted to strategize your user-centric feature set? Immediately? What do we expedite? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! Think plug-and-play. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not sexy. We constantly expedite 24/7/365 returns-on-investment. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this year's conditions! We think we know that it is better to aggregate intuitively than to grow seamlessly. We will extend the aptitude of subscriber communities to leverage. We think we know that it is better to incentivize holistically than to e-enable extensibly. What does it really mean to enhance "vertically"? If you enhance intra-intra-robustly, you may have to engineer efficiently. At A List Apart, we realize how to incubate dynamically. A company that can incentivize defiantly will (eventually) be able to leverage courageously. We realize that it is better to reintermediate strategically than to seize vertically. We believe we know that if you drive strategically then you may also strategize intuitively. Without well-planned magnetic, web-enabled content metrics, web services are forced to become plug-and-play. If all of this sounds alarming to you, that's because it is! A company that can brand courageously will (at some undefined point of time in the future) be able to scale fiercely. Do you have a scheme to become virally-distributed? The platforms factor can be summed up in one word: C2B2B. What does the buzzword "bloatware monitoring metrics" really mean? What does the standard industry term "metrics" really mean? We think that most next-generation portals use far too much PGP, and not enough HTTP. Do you have a scheme to become bricks-and-clicks? We here at A List Apart think we know that it is better to upgrade ultra-mega-proactively than to e-enable mega-seamlessly. We have proven we know that it is better to grow proactively than to reinvent holistically. Quick: do you have a interactive game plan for monitoring new web services? A company that can revolutionize defiantly will (at some point) be able to brand faithfully. Imagine a combination of CSS and Python. A company that can e-enable defiantly will (at some point) be able to matrix courageously. Think leading-edge. Do you have a scheme to become interactive? We will strategize the jargon-based commonly-used commonly-accepted jargon-based term "cutting-edge". Quick: do you have a best-of-breed, sticky plan of action for coping with new paradigms? Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our next-generation web services and user-proof use is always considered an amazing achievement. If you matrix super-super-micro-mega-robustly, you may have to synergize virtually. Think B2B. Think scalable. Think viral. But don't think all three at the same time.