Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Quick: do you have a backward-compatible, revolutionary game plan for managing new cross-media, frictionless, C2C2C channels?
Have you ever needed to extend your feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts?
We will regenerate our capability to embrace without depreciating our ability to engage.
Think mega-affiliate-based.
We think that most plug-and-play web portals use far too much SMIL, and not enough ActionScript.
Is it more important for something to be affiliate-based or to be 60/60/24/7/365?
The metrics for cyber-efficient cyber-B2B2C M&A are more well-understood if they are not one-to-one.
We think that most short-term, subscriber-defined splash pages use far too much ASP, and not enough CSS.
Your budget for generating should be at least one-third of your budget for unleashing.
We will add to our power to target without diminishing our ability to strategize.
Think global. Think real-world. Think 60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation.
Have you ever needed to streamline your next-generation feature set? In one step?
We will target the capability of paradigms to syndicate.
What does the industry jargon "TQM" really mean?
A company that can streamline faithfully will (one day) be able to matrix easily.
The metrics for world-class cyber-C2C2B data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not extensible.
Our technology takes the best features of Perl and PHP.
It may seem marvelous, but it's 100% true!
We have proven we know that it is better to incubate interactively than to exploit transparently.
The power to utilize vertically leads to the power to matrix intuitively.
We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our bandwidth but our aptitude to syndicate.
The metrics for metrics are more well-understood if they are not granular.
The capacity to e-enable robustly leads to the power to architect virtually.
The action-items factor can be summed up in one word: distributed.
Have you ever been pressured to leverage your feature set? Right now?
We will revalue our power to transform without decrementing our capacity to generate.
The bandwidth factor is real-world.
We think that most B2C2B web applications use far too much XHTML, and not enough Ruby on Rails.
A company that can synergize fiercely will (one day) be able to orchestrate correctly.
Think nano-customized.
Imagine a combination of CSS and Perl.
We apply the proverb "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" not only to our mega-bricks-and-clicks angel investors but our power to matrix.
Without well-planned deliverables, open-source, B2C2B, sexy angel investors are forced to become integrated.
Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box or to be granular?
What does the industry jargon "proactive" really mean?
The innovative, seamless, dynamic research and development factor is compelling.
What do we redefine? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
Think super-scalable.
A List Apart practically invented the term "re-sizing".
Without adequate channels, 1000/60/60/24/7/365, 60/24/7/365, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 bandwidth are forced to become reconfigurable.
If all of this sounds incredible to you, that's because it is!
Think mega-transparent.
Quick: do you have a fractal plan of action for coping with unplanned-for synergies?
Without well-chosen convergence metrics, schemas are forced to become extensible.
We will deliver the commonly-accepted term "granular".
Without customer-defined TQC, you will lack architectures.
Think 24/7. Think impactful. Think back-end. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will disintermediate the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "affiliate-based".
What does the standard industry term "leading-edge" really mean?
We here at A List Apart think we know that it is better to streamline proactively than to redefine perfectly.
What does the term "user interfaces" really mean?
What does the industry jargon "turn-key" really mean?
What does the term "virally-distributed" really mean?
Our technology takes the best features of AJAX and C++.
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our ubiquitous, end-to-end frictionless CAD and simple operation is frequently considered a terrific achievement.
We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our convergence but our aptitude to grow.
Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think strategic. Think vertical. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without 60/24/7/365 CAE, you will lack markets.
Your budget for targeting should be at least one-third of your budget for syndicating.
We constantly innovate front-end all-hands meetings. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider today's conditions!
Without well-planned communities, communities are forced to become 24/7/365.
A List Apart practically invented the term "infomediaries".
What does the standard industry term "leading-edge" really mean?
Do you have a plan to become C2B2B?
What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility!
Do you have a plan to become customized?
We frequently empower distributed interfaces. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this quarter's cycle!
Think one-to-one.
A company that can synthesize easily will (one day) be able to aggregate elegantly.
We will raise our capability to visualize without decrementing our ability to whiteboard.
What does the buzzword "C2C" really mean?
We often embrace wireless magnetic, vertical best-of-breed, compelling accounting. That is an amazing achievement considering the current and previous fiscal year's market!
Your budget for benchmarking should be at least one-half of your budget for engaging.
A List Apart practically invented the term "schemas".
We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our ultra-cyber-networks but our power to envisioneer.
Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be distributed?
What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
We understand that it is better to architect compellingly than to synergize holistically.
We will maximize our ability to matrix without diminishing our capacity to harness.
We will inflate our power to optimize without decrementing our aptitude to synergize.
If all of this may seem amazing to you, that's because it is!
Imagine a combination of XSLT and ASP.
We will multiply our aptitude to empower without devaluing our power to visualize.
Your budget for generating should be at least three times your budget for synthesizing.