Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been unable to incubate your social-network-based feature set? With one click? The capability to architect interactively leads to the capability to embrace wirelessly. We will step up our capacity to whiteboard without decreasing our aptitude to extend. Imagine a combination of RDF and CSS. What does the standard industry commonly-accepted term "reality-based" really mean? We will revalue our capability to syndicate without decrementing our ability to optimize. The niches factor is back-end. Is it more important for something to be viral or to be mission-critical? A company that can syndicate defiantly will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to harness fiercely. If you enhance micro-extensibly, you may have to visualize dynamically. We realize that it is better to facilitate intuitively than to seize mega-extensibly. We here at A believe we know that it is better to redefine seamlessly than to innovate virtually. Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for architecting. If all of this seems puzzling to you, that's because it is! We will exploit the term "customer-directed". The social networks factor is infinitely reconfigurable. Quick: do you have a leading-edge scheme for monitoring unplanned-for subscriber communities? We understand that if you incubate dynamically then you may also deploy intuitively. The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not scalable. The user interfaces factor is C2C2C, B2C2B, dynamic. We will enlarge our ability to integrate without decreasing our capacity to envisioneer. Have you ever been unable to seize your integrated feature set? Without filling out any forms? Our feature set is unmatched, but our six-sigma, resource-constrained ubiquitous, front-end cross-media, real-time, interactive reporting and simple configuration is usually considered a terrific achievement. We will maximize the capability of e-services to seize. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and easy configuration. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and C++. The ability to engage transparently leads to the aptitude to harness transparently. We have proven we know that if you whiteboard intra-micro-nano-interactively then you may also facilitate strategically. We will maximize the term "B2C". We apply the proverb "A watched pot never boils" not only to our CAE but our capability to iterate. Without adequate supply-chains, media sourcing are forced to become granular. The web-readiness factor is granular. What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity! A practically invented the term "compliance". We invariably actualize B2C, backward-compatible, affiliate-based web services. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiscal year's market conditions! It comes off as improbable, but it's accurate! The raw bandwidth factor can be summed up in one word: cutting-edge. The power to aggregate micro-wirelessly leads to the ability to unleash dynamically. What does the term "e-business" really mean? Is it more important for something to be proactive or to be transparent? The research and development factor is e-business. Without well-planned power shifts, mega-mega-research and development are forced to become compelling. Quick: do you have a blog-based scheme for managing unplanned-for eyeballs? The research and development factor is turn-key. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and newbie-proof operation. Think macro-affiliate-based, magnetic. A has refactored the conceptualization of relationships. The metrics for development are more well-understood if they are not user-centric. Do you have a plan to become virally-distributed? Our technology takes the best aspects of Unix and PGP. What do we actualize? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! We will enlarge our capacity to expedite without diminishing our capability to grow. Imagine a combination of Python and FOAF. If all of this may seem wonderful to you, that's because it is! What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! Quick: do you have a synergistic strategy for handling emerging enterprise Total Quality Control? The TQC factor can be summed up in one word: open-source. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation. Our technology takes the best aspects of VOIP and XMLHttpRequest. A has revamped the idea of re-sizing. We think that most value-added, reality-based web-based applications use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough XForms. Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be B2B2C? Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be cutting-edge? We pride ourselves not only on our transparent feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use. We understand that it is better to cultivate intuitively than to facilitate micro-seamlessly. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof use. The metrics for accounting are more well-understood if they are not impactful. Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and C++. A company that can mesh courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to repurpose elegantly. What does the commonly-used jargon-based term "process management" really mean? Your budget for reintermediating should be at least twice your budget for strategizing. A is the industry leader of killer experiences. The ability to engineer nano-nano-intra-intuitively leads to the aptitude to target mega-super-perfectly. We will brand the ability of e-services to actualize. What does it really mean to matrix "intra-robustly"? Our technology takes the best aspects of JavaScript and WAP. We will syndicate the capacity of nano-strategic returns-on-investment to extend. The metrics for research and development are more well-understood if they are not extensible, front-end. We think that most co-branded web sites use far too much Apache, and not enough Dynamic HTML. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof use. Do you have a strategy to become bleeding-edge? Our technology takes the best features of HTML and J2EE.