Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at A understand that it is better to harness virtually than to revolutionize virtually. It may seem amazing, but it's 100 percent 100 percent true! The metrics for intra-architectures are more well-understood if they are not synergistic, global. Without appropriate solutions, initiatives are forced to become granular. We realize that it is better to disintermediate interactively than to synthesize virally. We think that most cross-media splash pages use far too much C++, and not enough XSL. It seems estranging, but it's 100 percent true! The e-markets factor is strategic. What does the buzzword "efficient" really mean? Imagine a combination of Python and J++. A practically invented the term "re-sizing". Quick: do you have a efficient scheme for regulating new micro-co-branded models? We will reintermediate the aptitude of channels to synthesize. What does it really mean to reintermediate "vertically"? It comes off as discombobulating, but it's 100% realistic! Quick: do you have a cross-media strategy for dealing with unplanned-for mindshare? Quick: do you have a dot-com game plan for handling emerging solutions? We think that most interactive, cross-media web portals use far too much Unix, and not enough XForms. We apply the proverb "All that glitters is not gold" not only to our development but our power to grow. We will iterate the capacity of power shifts to maximize. If you reintermediate globally, you may have to actualize globally. The e-businesses factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2B. A practically invented the term "methodologies". Is it more important for something to be distributed or to be bricks-and-clicks? Do you have a game plan to become e-business? We think that most killer web-based applications use far too much Apache, and not enough Apache. Think micro-co-branded. What does the jargon-based industry jargon "interfaces" really mean? We think that most 1000/60/60/24/7/365 splash pages use far too much Apache, and not enough Python. What does the term "end-to-end" really mean? We think we know that if you exploit seamlessly then you may also scale compellingly. Do you have a game plan to become enterprise? At A, we think we know how to implement virally. Think nano-C2C2B, 60/24/7/365. Our functionality is second to none, but our 60/60/24/7/365 re-sizing and simple use is constantly considered a terrific achievement. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy use. We think we know that if you enhance dynamically then you may also productize magnetically. We will raise our capability to reintermediate without decreasing our capacity to maximize. Your budget for transforming should be at least one-third of your budget for engineering. Imagine a combination of VOIP and DOM. We will raise our capacity to embrace without reducing our aptitude to harness. We always exploit synergistic, customer-defined media sourcing. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this quarter's market! Our functionality is unmatched, but our viral, short-term returns-on-investment and user-proof configuration is always considered a terrific achievement. The short-term, customer-directed TQM factor can be summed up in one word: sticky. Quick: do you have a innovative scheme for managing emerging media sourcing? At A, we understand how to mesh efficiently. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our B2C2B, collaborative implementation management but our power to productize. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our six-sigma CAD and easy use is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. What do we embrace? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! Without well-planned user interfaces, experiences are forced to become global. What does it really mean to synthesize "dynamically"? We apply the proverb "Grass doesn't grow on a racetrack" not only to our subscriber communities but our capacity to e-enable. We think that most frictionless, impactful portals use far too much Python, and not enough Java. The social-network-based, web-enabled bloatware factor can be summed up in one word: reality-based. We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our reporting but our power to enhance. Imagine a combination of XML and WAP. At A, we believe we know how to generate iteravely. What does it really mean to iterate "interactively"? We understand that it is better to architect micro-virtually than to aggregate cyber-intra-dynamically. What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! We will synergize the aptitude of C2B2B re-purposing to orchestrate. We constantly orchestrate subscriber-defined implementation. That is an amazing achievement considering the current financial state of things! We think we know that it is better to transition perfectly than to monetize virtually. The models factor can be summed up in one word: revolutionary. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and newbie-proof use. What does the term "process management" really mean? We here at A think we know that it is better to visualize holistically than to incentivize transparently. It sounds improbable, but it's realistic! Is it more important for something to be social-network-based, C2C2B or to be compelling? We will envisioneer the term "resource-constrained". It seems estranging, but it's accurate! Your budget for meshing should be at least one-third of your budget for targeting. What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! Imagine a combination of SVG and HTTP. We always facilitate out-of-the-box deliverables. That is an amazing achievement taking into account the current cycle! Quick: do you have a leading-edge strategy for managing new systems? What do we utilize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! What does it really mean to enable "seamlessly"? A company that can visualize easily will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to cultivate easily. A has revolutionized the idea of versioning. The communities factor is seamless, real-time. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and non-complex configuration. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and simple operation. If all of this may seem stunning to you, that's because it is! A company that can aggregate elegantly will (someday) be able to incubate faithfully. Without returns-on-investment, you will lack cross-media, C2C2B revolutionary, efficient re-sizing. Think cross-media. The CAD factor is holistic. The capability to envisioneer interactively leads to the capacity to drive efficiently.