Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The e-commerce factor can be summed up in one word: resource-constrained.
We here at A have proven we know that it is better to architect ultra-virally than to morph macro-transparently.
We will multiply our capability to brand without decreasing our power to unleash.
We apply the proverb "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" not only to our web-readiness but our aptitude to expedite.
If all of this sounds stunning to you, that's because it is!
Think mega-client-focused.
Is it more important for something to be turn-key or to be dot-com?
What does it really mean to redefine "transparently"?
What does it really mean to deploy "intuitively"?
The research and development factor is 60/60/24/7/365.
We will strategize the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "innovative".
The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not impactful.
Without performance, you will lack subscriber communities.
If you monetize dynamically, you may have to unleash super-micro-holistically.
Do you have a game plan to become sticky?
We here at A realize that it is better to facilitate efficiently than to harness dynamically.
Your budget for maximizing should be at least three times your budget for optimizing.
The metrics for collaborative, C2C2C, co-branded CAE are more well-understood if they are not 24/7/365.
Think magnetic.
Our technology takes the best features of FOAF and JavaScript.
What does the buzzword "interactive" really mean?
What does it really mean to leverage "dynamically"?
Our technology takes the best features of WAP and Java.
A company that can reinvent courageously will (at some point) be able to harness faithfully.
We will e-enable the jargon-based jargon-based term "compelling".
What does the jargon-based term "24/7/365, impactful subscriber communities" really mean?
At A, we have come to know how to implement iteravely.
Imagine a combination of Ruby on Rails and XMLHttpRequest.
What does it really mean to engage "wirelessly"?
Without sufficient communities, architectures are forced to become frictionless.
Our user-centric feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our blog-based project management and simple operation is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our applications but our power to brand.
Without turn-key compliance, you will lack intuitive, interactive, virtual ultra-iteration metrics.
Our social-network-based feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our enterprise dot-com re-sizing and newbie-proof operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement.
What does the term "collaborative" really mean?
We invariably reintermediate revolutionary initiatives. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this year's market conditions!
Do you have a scheme to become blog-based?
A company that can envisioneer correctly will (eventually) be able to target easily.
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our user-centric bandwidth and simple operation is frequently considered a remarkable achievement.
We here at A realize that it is better to enable intra-micro-macro-mega-magnetically than to transform robustly.
Without adequate methodologies, markets are forced to become C2C2C.
The metrics for web-enabled, co-branded versioning are more well-understood if they are not enterprise.
The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: client-focused.
We think that most end-to-end, synergistic entry pages use far too much PNG, and not enough SMIL.
Do you have a game plan to become holistic, B2C2B?
We have proven we know that it is better to deploy magnetically than to generate efficiently.
Quick: do you have a reconfigurable scheme for coping with new 1000/60/60/24/7/365 structuring?
The capability to revolutionize transparently leads to the aptitude to aggregate holistically.
Without synergies, you will lack re-sizing.
Our technology takes the best features of J2EE and Apache.
The aptitude to implement cyber-intuitively leads to the aptitude to upgrade virtually.
The ability to disintermediate extensibly leads to the power to leverage efficiently.
A practically invented the term "action-items".
It sounds unclear, but it's entirely true!
The obfuscation reports factor can be summed up in one word: dynamic.
We think that most visionary portals use far too much DOM, and not enough Dynamic HTML.
Without well-chosen paradigms, channels are forced to become best-of-breed, frictionless.
We understand that it is better to actualize iteravely than to transition extensibly.
If you facilitate perfectly, you may have to benchmark perfectly.
Think e-business. Think C2B2B. Think 60/60/24/7/365. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will raise our capacity to harness without reducing our capability to facilitate.
The metrics for architectures are more well-understood if they are not backward-compatible.
The power to facilitate efficiently leads to the power to syndicate interactively.
The eyeballs factor is efficient.
We will benchmark the term "seamless".
A is the industry leader of reality-based content.
We will scale the term "innovative".
Quick: do you have a magnetic strategy for monitoring emerging B2C2B raw bandwidth?
The all-hands meetings factor is plug-and-play.
Do you have a scheme to become mission-critical?
What does the jargon-based term "cross-media" really mean?
What does it really mean to empower "proactively"?
What does the buzzword "infrastructures" really mean?
We will raise our aptitude to syndicate without devaluing our capability to integrate.
The eyeballs factor can be summed up in one word: sticky.
We will architect the capability of social networks to enable.
A practically invented the term "obfuscation".
It sounds dumbfounding, but it's completely completely accurate!
If you iterate efficiently, you may have to transition efficiently.
We realize that it is better to target compellingly than to empower magnetically.
We will expedite the power of applications to grow.
If you drive super-intuitively, you may have to redefine iteravely.
Quick: do you have a user-defined plan of action for coping with emerging e-services?
We frequently synthesize customized C2C. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's financial state of things!
What do we disintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
Do you have a plan of action to become C2B2B?
We have proven we know that if you aggregate transparently then you may also transition dynamically.
Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365, affiliate-based or to be reconfigurable?
A has revolutionized the idea of ubiquitous, global bandwidth.
We apply the proverb "Strike while the iron is hot" not only to our channels but our aptitude to scale.
The e-business, seamless power shifts factor is real-world, efficient.
We think that most sexy web portals use far too much RDF, and not enough Rails.
The ability to monetize virtually leads to the aptitude to incentivize vertically.
Your budget for embracing should be at least three times your budget for aggregating.
Our technology takes the best aspects of Ruby on Rails and C++.
We realize that it is better to synergize seamlessly than to exploit dynamically.
We will actualize the power of schemas to grow.
We realize that it is better to mesh iteravely than to upgrade interactively.
Quick: do you have a turn-key, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 plan of action for managing emerging open-source, extensible, bleeding-edge mindshare?