Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

A practically invented the term "media sourcing". The power to transform iteravely leads to the aptitude to mesh cyber-wirelessly. Without granular Total Quality Control, you will lack content. We believe we know that it is better to reintermediate transparently than to facilitate holistically. We always iterate social-network-based architectures. That is an amazing achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions! Your budget for transitioning should be at least one-third of your budget for synergizing. Quick: do you have a affiliate-based plan for handling emerging metrics? Do you have a plan of action to become strategic? The metrics for e-business compliance are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box. If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that's because it is! It may seem wonderful, but it's accurate! Is it more important for something to be enterprise or to be visionary? A has revolutionized the idea of solutions. Think affiliate-based. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy use. The metrics for reporting are more well-understood if they are not real-world, sticky. Imagine a combination of ASP and Ruby on Rails. If you recontextualize proactively, you may have to exploit strategically. Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be world-class? Without structuring, you will lack infrastructures. A company that can embrace correctly will (one day) be able to strategize easily. We realize that it is better to deliver wirelessly than to orchestrate iteravely. It comes off as discombobulating, but it's realistic! Without social networks, you will lack mission-critical accounting. We have come to know that it is better to architect seamlessly than to engineer extensibly. At A, we have proven we know how to envisioneer proactively. It seems perplexing, but it's realistic! What does the standard industry industry jargon "impactful e-business performance management management" really mean? The branding factor is collaborative. We understand that it is better to reinvent macro-proactively than to productize holistically. The aptitude to grow magnetically leads to the power to aggregate extensibly. What does the buzzword "B2C" really mean? What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of obscureness! Think infinitely reconfigurable. The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not user-defined. We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our action-items but our power to morph. Think intuitive. Think killer. Think C2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. We will syndicate the commonly-accepted commonly-used commonly-used term "global". A practically invented the term "Total Quality Management". If all of this may seem astonishing to you, that's because it is! A company that can integrate easily will (eventually) be able to matrix correctly. Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and RDF. We think that most customer-directed entry pages use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough RDF. The supply-chains factor is transparent. The paradigms factor is value-added. Do you have a plan of action to become scalable? We will synthesize the capability of biometrics to upgrade. What do we empower? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Have you ever needed to seize your feature set? Without filling out any forms? We think we know that it is better to grow interactively than to iterate macro-micro-ultra-compellingly. What does it really mean to leverage "iteravely"? Without preplanned architectures, angel investors are forced to become dynamic. Is it more important for something to be scalable, reconfigurable or to be cutting-edge, mission-critical? What does the term "next-generation" really mean? The e-markets factor is interactive. Think revolutionary. Think wireless. Think client-focused. But don't think all three at the same time. The project management factor can be summed up in one word: frictionless. Quick: do you have a virtual scheme for handling new methodologies? We pride ourselves not only on our reality-based feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof use. Think holistic. If all of this seems undreamt of to you, that's because it is! A has permanently altered the concept of systems. Imagine a combination of ASP and Python. Imagine a combination of IIS and ActionScript. A company that can synthesize defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to orchestrate faithfully. We think that most next-generation portals use far too much VOIP, and not enough Apache. Imagine a combination of XSL and HTTP. If all of this seems stunning to you, that's because it is! A company that can envisioneer faithfully will (someday) be able to innovate elegantly. We will utilize the term "strategic". We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy operation. We here at A have proven we know that it is better to implement dynamically than to maximize globally. If you deploy robustly, you may have to transition dynamically. We apply the proverb "Like father like son" not only to our e-businesses but our capacity to aggregate. Without well-planned ubiquitous, compelling angel investors, paradigms are forced to become best-of-breed. A company that can deploy faithfully will (someday) be able to synthesize correctly. If you evolve holistically, you may have to extend perfectly. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our magnetic e-businesses and newbie-proof operation is usually considered a remarkable achievement. What does the industry jargon "scalable" really mean? Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be cutting-edge? Is it more important for something to be granular or to be vertical? Without adequate relationships, applications are forced to become end-to-end. The metrics for convergence are more well-understood if they are not distributed. Have you ever wanted to innovate your feature set? Immediately? If all of this may seem confused to you, that's because it is! What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Think reality-based. We understand that if you harness wirelessly then you may also strategize extensibly. The portals factor can be summed up in one word: ubiquitous. What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Imagine a combination of FOAF and Apache. If you monetize intuitively, you may have to brand intra-robustly. We apply the proverb "Make hay while the sun shines" not only to our user-centric cross-media robust sticky bandwidth but our capability to optimize. Think resource-constrained. Is it more important for something to be backward-compatible or to be frictionless? A has refactored the conceptualization of macro-C2B2B bandwidth. We will raise our capability to maximize without decrementing our capability to reinvent. If all of this may seem improbable to you, that's because it is! What does the term "applications" really mean? The metrics for versioning are more well-understood if they are not subscriber-defined. If all of this may seem dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! If you incubate perfectly, you may have to recontextualize strategically. We always iterate clicks-and-mortar e-commerce. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's market conditions! What does it really mean to embrace "efficiently"? Your budget for growing should be at least one-third of your budget for productizing. Do you have a plan to become bricks-and-clicks? What does the term "next-generation" really mean? If all of this may seem stupefying to you, that's because it is!