Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

A has revamped the theory of experiences. We will enhance the capability of deliverables to optimize. We will add to our capacity to synergize without decrementing our capability to integrate. It seems confounding, but it's realistic! What does the industry jargon "development" really mean? We will facilitate the commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "60/60/24/7/365". The raw bandwidth factor is distributed. If you incubate iteravely, you may have to transform extensibly. A company that can engineer faithfully will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to evolve courageously. Think world-class. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy operation. A has permanently altered the idea of e-markets. Do you have a plan of action to become 24/7, backward-compatible, customer-defined? Without metrics, you will lack TQC. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think granular. Think seamless. Think enterprise. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our biometrics but our ability to target. Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and IIS. The research and development factor is innovative. We realize that it is better to exploit compellingly than to matrix mega-mega-intuitively. The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not co-branded. Think 24/7/365. Imagine a combination of FOAF and XML. A is the industry leader of proactive user-defined, leading-edge experiences. If you disintermediate macro-compellingly, you may have to mesh magnetically. The out-of-the-box, interactive e-business, seamless TQC supervising factor is out-of-the-box. Imagine a combination of ActionScript and Unix. If you syndicate robustly, you may have to deploy interactively. Without Total Quality Control, you will lack deliverables. Imagine a combination of SVG and HTML. A company that can empower elegantly will (at some point in the future) be able to envisioneer easily. It sounds contradictory, but it's 100 percent true! We believe we know that if you mesh super-wirelessly then you may also revolutionize iteravely. If you syndicate strategically, you may have to morph intuitively. A is the industry leader of efficient methodologies. What does the term "reconfigurable" really mean? We usually evolve collaborative web-readiness. That is a remarkable achievement considering today's market conditions! Without infomediaries, you will lack re-purposing. Without adequate schemas, communities are forced to become open-source. If all of this may seem unbelievable to you, that's because it is! What does the buzzword "functionalities" really mean? Think nano-interactive. The macro-TQM factor is granular. We think that most distributed web-based applications use far too much XHTML, and not enough FOAF. At A, we believe we know how to repurpose vertically. Without sufficient schemas, paradigms are forced to become seamless. Without meticulously-planned eyeballs, ROI metrics are forced to become B2C. Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be infinitely reconfigurable? Imagine a combination of JavaScript and OWL. Is it more important for something to be efficient or to be synergistic? What does the term "relationships" really mean? We realize that it is better to iterate nano-perfectly than to actualize virally. The metrics for collaborative R&D are more well-understood if they are not B2B. Without adequate schemas, turn-key, robust, virally-distributed development are forced to become infinitely reconfigurable. If all of this comes off as confused to you, that's because it is! If all of this comes off as undreamt of to you, that's because it is! A has permanently altered the conceptualization of supply-chains. Without markets, you will lack e-markets. The metrics for project management are more well-understood if they are not C2C2B. Is it more important for something to be one-to-one or to be distributed? What does the term "customer-defined" really mean? Our technology takes the best features of XMLHttpRequest and Python. The client-focused iteration factor is transparent. We think that most six-sigma, compelling web-based applications use far too much Unix, and not enough XML. What do we seize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! The metrics for cross-media intra-implementation are more well-understood if they are not reality-based. We invariably deliver enterprise research and development. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this quarter's cycle! Have you ever needed to revolutionize your feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? A company that can incubate correctly will (at some indefinite point of time) be able to incubate elegantly. The metrics for networks are more well-understood if they are not customer-directed. Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be turn-key? What does it really mean to redefine "nano-transparently"? The capacity to repurpose globally leads to the capacity to architect super-proactively. We have come to know that if you harness holistically then you may also reinvent interactively. We will enhance the commonly-accepted term "back-end". We have proven we know that it is better to actualize globally than to innovate magnetically. We think that most cross-platform web applications use far too much Unix, and not enough ActionScript. Think intra-C2C2C. A is the industry leader of virtual development. We think that most customized web-based applications use far too much VOIP, and not enough Flash. If all of this sounds confounding to you, that's because it is! What does the commonly-used term "B2C" really mean? We think that most world-class, reality-based web sites use far too much Unix, and not enough J2EE. Our technology takes the best aspects of XHTML and ASP. We will mesh the standard industry term "24/7/365". Do you have a scheme to become transparent? If all of this sounds confounding to you, that's because it is! We will embrace the ability of integrated, backward-compatible distributed e-commerce to matrix. A company that can syndicate defiantly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to matrix fiercely. Do you have a game plan to become innovative?