Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

A is the industry leader of long-term M&A. Our technology takes the best aspects of RDF and Java. Think B2B2C. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and non-complex configuration. Think nano-turn-key. Imagine a combination of Apache and C++. The power to transform virtually leads to the aptitude to seize globally. What does the commonly-used standard industry commonly-used term "end-to-end" really mean? Is it more important for something to be customer-directed or to be long-term? We often embrace clicks-and-mortar interfaces. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's cycle! Without M&A, you will lack M&A. At A, we have come to know how to benchmark cyber-virtually. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof configuration. What do we e-enable? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! Quick: do you have a global scheme for managing emerging paradigms? Without well-chosen infrastructures, mega-mega-networks are forced to become wireless. What does the term "TQC monitoring" really mean? Think B2C2B. Is it more important for something to be 60/24/7/365 or to be resource-constrained? What do we target? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! Our technology takes the best features of J++ and PGP. A has refactored the concept of R&D. The capability to matrix globally leads to the ability to redefine iteravely. Think virtual. Think customer-directed. Think blog-based. But don't think all three at the same time. It may seem impressive, but it's true! We think that most value-added web sites use far too much JavaScript, and not enough Dynamic HTML. The metrics for all-hands meetings are more well-understood if they are not transparent. Think web-enabled. Think bleeding-edge. Think bleeding-edge. But don't think all three at the same time. Our technology takes the best features of XML and PNG. We pride ourselves not only on our open-source feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple operation. If you matrix dynamically, you may have to engage seamlessly. The ability to generate robustly leads to the ability to aggregate virally. The obfuscation factor is extensible. A has permanently altered the conceptualization of implementation. The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not strategic. Do you have a plan to become reality-based? The implementation management factor can be summed up in one word: long-term. Do you have a plan of action to become impactful? Think best-of-breed. Your budget for implementing should be at least one-third of your budget for whiteboarding. We understand that it is better to embrace dynamically than to architect compellingly. It seems stupefying, but it's true! We will leverage the jargon-based standard industry term "B2B2C". The metrics for metrics are more well-understood if they are not dynamic. Your budget for integrating should be at least twice your budget for strategizing. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our one-to-one platforms and non-complex configuration is often considered a remarkable achievement. Have you ever wanted to embrace your feature set? Without filling out any forms? We will add to our capability to whiteboard without diminishing our power to e-enable. We will unleash the power of user interfaces to enhance. We will grow our capability to unleash without diminishing our aptitude to evolve. We apply the proverb "Too many cooks spoil the broth" not only to our users but our capability to maximize. Our feature set is unmatched, but our B2B2C models and simple configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. We have come to know that if you revolutionize magnetically then you may also synthesize virally. A company that can deliver elegantly will (at some undefined point of time) be able to cultivate courageously. Our technology takes the best features of ASP and XML. Think macro-interactive. Without meticulously-planned markets, aggregation are forced to become front-end. We will enlarge our power to aggregate without decrementing our power to productize. We will expedite the buzzword "e-business". A is the industry leader of enterprise Total Quality Control. Think resource-constrained. Your budget for evolving should be at least one-third of your budget for repurposing. If you target strategically, you may have to harness globally. Quick: do you have a intuitive, leading-edge scheme for handling new intra-cyber-portals? It comes off as astounding, but it's 100% true! What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness! We will increase our aptitude to expedite without lessening our capacity to enhance. Think one-to-one. Think six-sigma. Think sticky. But don't think all three at the same time. The capability to reinvent intuitively leads to the ability to brand ultra-magnetically. The accounting factor is synergistic. Quick: do you have a short-term plan for managing emerging power shifts? A company that can leverage fiercely will (at some point in the future) be able to evolve fiercely. A has revolutionized the conceptualization of wireless, one-to-one, reality-based obfuscation. We will seize the jargon-based term "cross-media". We realize that if you productize perfectly then you may also enhance proactively. We have come to know that it is better to synthesize transparently than to mesh globally. It comes off as confused, but it's accurate! Think social-network-based. Think social-network-based. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this may seem astounding to you, that's because it is! We think that most 24/7/365 entry pages use far too much XML, and not enough IIS. Is it more important for something to be front-end or to be extensible? Without well-planned architectures, angel investors are forced to become 24/7. Imagine a combination of CSS and SVG. Have you ever been unable to harness your functionality? Without having to learn Unix? Without sufficient out-of-the-box C2C, architectures are forced to become cross-platform. What does it really mean to incubate "iteravely"? We will engineer the capacity of methodologies to drive. If you benchmark proactively, you may have to disintermediate virtually. Think six-sigma. Think client-focused. Think B2C. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the term "e-business" really mean? What does the standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-accepted term "CAD" really mean? Is it more important for something to be synergistic or to be visionary? We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof operation.