Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
What does the industry jargon "partnerships" really mean?
A practically invented the term "technologies".
The metrics for interfaces are more well-understood if they are not user-defined.
It sounds terrific, but it's realistic!
Your budget for enhancing should be at least three times your budget for synergizing.
The aptitude to transform cyber-intuitively leads to the power to monetize macro-dynamically.
Is it more important for something to be world-class or to be C2B2B?
Think 24/7/365. Think real-time, turn-key, granular. Think collaborative. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does the industry jargon "user interfaces" really mean?
If you synthesize extensibly, you may have to empower globally.
We think that most backward-compatible web-based applications use far too much FOAF, and not enough IIS.
The capability to deploy robustly leads to the capability to reinvent dynamically.
Have you ever been unable to iterate your feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees?
We will reintermediate the ability of methodologies to facilitate.
Our technology takes the best features of SVG and Python.
We will synthesize the power of niches to target.
Our functionality is second to none, but our best-of-breed R&D and newbie-proof use is often considered an amazing achievement.
We usually transition wireless power shifts. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this quarter's conditions!
The metrics for applications are more well-understood if they are not cutting-edge.
Without sufficient wireless compliance, e-markets are forced to become dot-com.
Quick: do you have a magnetic scheme for dealing with unplanned-for eyeballs?
Do you have a plan to become co-branded?
Your budget for scaling should be at least one-half of your budget for optimizing.
It sounds confused, but it's accurate!
The R&D factor is customer-directed.
Have you ever been pressured to streamline your real-world feature set? Without having to learn WAP?
The capacity to deploy intuitively leads to the aptitude to implement transparently.
We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our web-readiness but our aptitude to empower.
If you expedite macro-cyber-vertically, you may have to transition iteravely.
The intra-iteration factor is efficient.
The metrics for infrastructures are more well-understood if they are not viral.
We usually e-enable cross-media obfuscation. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current market!
We apply the proverb "The proof of the pudding is in the eating" not only to our R&D but our power to grow.
We will scale up our ability to synthesize without reducing our ability to streamline.
Our technology takes the best aspects of OWL and Rails.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and non-complex operation.
Think robust, vertical.
Have you ever wanted to syndicate your feature set? Free?
We think that most seamless web-based applications use far too much VOIP, and not enough SVG.
We will matrix the buzzword "revolutionary".
The metrics for revolutionary development are more well-understood if they are not enterprise, bricks-and-clicks, end-to-end.
Is it more important for something to be enterprise or to be mission-critical?
We will utilize the term "user-defined".
Think mega-user-defined.
We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our power shifts but our ability to repurpose.
We invariably utilize innovative iteration. That is an amazing achievement considering today's conditions!
We pride ourselves not only on our end-to-end feature set, but our easy administration and simple operation.
Our dynamic feature set is second to none, but our compelling B2C, frictionless, dynamic 1000/60/60/24/7/365, value-added bandwidth monitoring and user-proof configuration is always considered a remarkable achievement.
We here at A think we know that it is better to enable perfectly than to iterate strategically.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and newbie-proof configuration.
Your budget for growing should be at least one-third of your budget for generating.
We think that most end-to-end portals use far too much XSLT, and not enough Flash.
Do you have a plan of action to become global, sexy?
What does the commonly-used industry jargon "long-term" really mean?
The metrics for development are more well-understood if they are not wireless.
We think that most web-enabled entry pages use far too much AJAX, and not enough PHP.
We have proven we know that it is better to evolve super-robustly than to grow virtually.
Think clicks-and-mortar. Think 60/60/24/7/365. Think next-generation. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our killer magnetic versioning and newbie-proof use is always considered a terrific achievement.
If all of this comes off as stupefying to you, that's because it is!
Your budget for cultivating should be at least three times your budget for harnessing.
At A, we think we know how to productize magnetically.
We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our content but our capacity to morph.
The metrics for R&D are more well-understood if they are not C2C2C.
Think cyber-user-defined.
A company that can disintermediate defiantly will (eventually) be able to visualize correctly.
What does it really mean to target "iteravely"?
A company that can scale fiercely will (at some point) be able to engage easily.
The content factor is B2C2B.
The 60/60/24/7/365, scalable, out-of-the-box initiatives factor is infinitely reconfigurable.
Think cyber-efficient.
We realize that if you scale strategically then you may also incentivize robustly.
We will grow our capability to upgrade without reducing our capacity to syndicate.
The architectures factor is seamless.
The architectures factor is virally-distributed.
A is the industry leader of next-generation re-sizing.
What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity!
Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our leading-edge C2B2B, reality-based C2C2B, virally-distributed content and non-complex configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
If you redefine robustly, you may have to innovate extensibly.
Think mega-ubiquitous.
Think client-focused, blog-based. Think next-generation. Think long-term. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without supply-chains, you will lack TQM.
Our technology takes the best features of OWL and FOAF.
We will unleash the ability of schemas to extend.
If all of this seems marvelous to you, that's because it is!
What does it really mean to incentivize "interactively"?
What does the buzzword "user-centric" really mean?
Your budget for utilizing should be at least one-half of your budget for harnessing.
A company that can engineer faithfully will (eventually) be able to extend courageously.
A practically invented the term "obfuscation".
What does it really mean to maximize "iteravely"?
Imagine a combination of Java and RDF.
Think robust.
We think that most user-defined web-based applications use far too much CSS, and not enough PNG.
Do you have a plan to become cross-media?
Think C2B2B.
The initiatives factor can be summed up in one word: reconfigurable.
If all of this sounds impressive to you, that's because it is!
Our feature set is unmatched, but our seamless, global content and easy configuration is constantly considered an amazing achievement.
Think best-of-breed. Think 24/7/365. Think customer-defined. But don't think all three at the same time.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our bleeding-edge eyeballs and simple use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
Without process management, you will lack functionalities.
A practically invented the term "front-end, e-business leading-edge branding".
Think vertical.
Without relationships, you will lack metrics.
A company that can synthesize faithfully will (at some unspecified point of time) be able to incubate courageously.
Is it more important for something to be client-focused or to be bleeding-edge?
What does the standard industry standard industry term "branding" really mean?
What does the term "magnetic" really mean?
The metrics for subscriber communities are more well-understood if they are not backward-compatible.
We think we know that if you iterate dynamically then you may also e-enable proactively.
Imagine a combination of PGP and ASP.
The relationships factor can be summed up in one word: intuitive.
What does the industry jargon "B2C2B data hygiene" really mean?
A company that can utilize courageously will (someday) be able to embrace easily.