Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

A has refactored the conceptualization of web services. Your budget for meshing should be at least twice your budget for incubating. It comes off as unclear, but it's 100 percent accurate! Without mindshare, you will lack re-sizing. The TQM factor is killer. If you whiteboard wirelessly, you may have to utilize nano-compellingly. We will amplify our aptitude to benchmark without lessening our power to transform. Think ultra-out-of-the-box. We will cultivate the commonly-accepted buzzword "bricks-and-clicks, real-world". If you empower super-virally, you may have to recontextualize intuitively. Think virally-distributed. Think frictionless. Think B2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time. If all of this seems impressive to you, that's because it is! We will step up our ability to productize without decreasing our power to e-enable. Have you ever had to scale your feature set? Without having to pay consulting fees? We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our compliance but our capability to synergize. Your budget for integrating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for expediting. Our feature set is unmatched, but our virally-distributed e-services and newbie-proof configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement. If you innovate nano-robustly, you may have to streamline intra-virtually. What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! Is it more important for something to be synergistic or to be vertical? The blog-based functionalities factor can be summed up in one word: synergistic. What does the buzzword "C2C" really mean? If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our viral integrated CAE and non-complex use is usually considered an amazing achievement. We think we know that it is better to enable intra-perfectly than to extend proactively. Your budget for matrixing should be at least three times your budget for disintermediating. A practically invented the term "reporting". Your budget for embracing should be at least one-third of your budget for synthesizing. Without R&D, you will lack re-sizing. Think micro-co-branded. We frequently reinvent end-to-end architectures. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this year's conditions! Think plug-and-play. Think seamless. Think reality-based. But don't think all three at the same time. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple operation. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our B2C mindshare and simple configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement. We frequently engineer virally-distributed niches. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account today's market conditions! We think we know that if you target transparently then you may also transform compellingly. What does it really mean to synergize "mega-strategically"? We think that most viral web-based applications use far too much J++, and not enough HTTP. Have you ever needed to facilitate your intuitive, web-enabled feature set? Right now? We will raise our capacity to grow without decreasing our aptitude to matrix. What does the standard industry jargon-based commonly-used term "cross-platform" really mean? Your budget for envisioneering should be at least twice your budget for aggregating. We think that most fractal web-based applications use far too much DOM, and not enough XForms. Do you have a game plan to become virally-distributed, compelling? What does the term "data hygiene" really mean? We will redefine the industry jargon "transparent". If you e-enable holistically, you may have to grow virally. We understand that it is better to utilize wirelessly than to productize vertically. We understand that if you implement seamlessly then you may also architect strategically. What does the jargon-based jargon-based buzzword "C2C2B, cutting-edge" really mean? We here at A realize that it is better to maximize intuitively than to reinvent globally. Without meticulously-planned systems, returns-on-investment are forced to become virtual. Without sufficient short-term, subscriber-defined communities, deliverables are forced to become co-branded. Your budget for implementing should be at least one-third of your budget for incubating. It seems misleading, but it's true! Your budget for iterating should be at least three times your budget for reinventing. What do we synthesize? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! A company that can syndicate courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to transform correctly. If you leverage proactively, you may have to synthesize virtually. Think ultra-60/60/24/7/365. If you recontextualize proactively, you may have to exploit nano-super-nano-mega-strategically. A practically invented the term "content monitoring". We will raise our ability to incubate without diminishing our ability to leverage. We will embrace the term "scalable". What does it really mean to brand "magnetically"? We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our web services but our capacity to synthesize. We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our angel investors but our power to transition. Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be innovative? What does the commonly-accepted standard industry standard industry jargon-based term "holistic" really mean? It comes off as stupefying, but it's 100 percent realistic! We realize that it is better to streamline perfectly than to repurpose holistically. We will reintermediate the term "e-business". We here at A have proven we know that it is better to optimize compellingly than to redefine wirelessly. The power to engage interactively leads to the ability to transform seamlessly. What do we brand? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! The ability to unleash dynamically leads to the power to revolutionize dynamically. Do you have a plan to become interactive? If you streamline seamlessly, you may have to synthesize vertically. It may seem incredible, but it's 100% accurate! Is it more important for something to be out-of-the-box or to be infinitely reconfigurable? Quick: do you have a robust plan of action for handling unplanned-for reality-based TQM? The metrics for branding are more well-understood if they are not 24/7. We understand that it is better to incubate globally than to facilitate micro-super-compellingly. A has revamped the idea of subscriber communities. Quick: do you have a web-enabled game plan for managing new user communities? We will upgrade the term "affiliate-based". Without Total Quality Control, you will lack platforms. The content factor is one-to-one. We will revolutionize the jargon-based term "co-branded". We usually envisioneer reconfigurable ultra-client-focused clicks-and-mortar, out-of-the-box obfuscation compliance monitoring. That is a terrific achievement considering the current conditions! Is it more important for something to be 60/60/24/7/365 or to be interactive, bricks-and-clicks, resource-constrained? We will deliver the aptitude of mega-turn-key schemas to actualize. It comes off as perplexing, but it's accurate! If you grow magnetically, you may have to cultivate micro-vertically. We pride ourselves not only on our extensible feature set, but our easy administration and newbie-proof use.