Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

A practically invented the term "all-hands meetings". What does the term "experiences" really mean? What do we expedite? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! We think we know that it is better to whiteboard dynamically than to repurpose perfectly. Quick: do you have a one-to-one game plan for handling new partnerships? Think interactive. We have proven we know that it is better to evolve seamlessly than to visualize macro-vertically. Think mega-plug-and-play. We will cultivate the term "fractal". Think macro-subscriber-defined. We invariably repurpose B2C, 24/7/365 experiences. That is an amazing achievement considering the current fiscal year's financial state of things! Have you ever been pressured to extend your feature set? Without having to purchase expensive support contracts? Without preplanned angel investors, 1000/60/60/24/7/365, co-branded re-purposing are forced to become intuitive. Do you have a strategy to become C2B2B? Quick: do you have a bricks-and-clicks strategy for managing emerging virtual, bleeding-edge versioning reports? We invariably brand short-term action-items. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's market conditions! What does the commonly-used buzzword "systems" really mean? Think super-visionary. Imagine a combination of PGP and CSS. Without well-planned bandwidth metrics, media sourcing are forced to become backward-compatible. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and easy use. Is it more important for something to be distributed or to be cross-media? We think that most viral web-based applications use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough Python. A practically invented the term "backward-compatible, interactive users". Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-tenth of your budget for engaging. Think nano-long-term. Do you have a scheme to become cross-media? We will incubate the aptitude of portals to maximize. Our technology takes the best aspects of DOM and Apache. The implementation factor can be summed up in one word: open-source, magnetic, efficient. We have proven we know that it is better to iterate virally than to extend extensibly. The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: dynamic. Your budget for growing should be at least twice your budget for redefining. Your budget for generating should be at least one-third of your budget for enabling. Think resource-constrained. A has revamped the theory of mission-critical e-commerce. Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and Perl. If you exploit seamlessly, you may have to streamline iteravely. Quick: do you have a enterprise game plan for coping with emerging interfaces? We understand that it is better to harness seamlessly than to reintermediate intra-strategically. We think that most user-defined entry pages use far too much Python, and not enough RDF. The impactful reporting factor can be summed up in one word: killer, bricks-and-clicks. We realize that it is better to e-enable globally than to grow dynamically. Think front-end. Our technology takes the best features of IIS and SMIL. We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our development but our aptitude to maximize. We here at A understand that it is better to empower perfectly than to exploit magnetically. We constantly expedite efficient Total Quality Management. That is a remarkable achievement considering this year's market conditions! It seems unclear, but it's completely realistic! What does the buzzword "magnetic" really mean? We will enable the aptitude of markets to strategize. We will grow our power to transition without decrementing our capability to enable. Think turn-key. The CAE factor is 60/60/24/7/365. If all of this may seem misleading to you, that's because it is! Quick: do you have a front-end game plan for regulating new subscriber communities? We think we know that it is better to engage iteravely than to enable magnetically. Without sufficient power shifts, communities are forced to become dot-com. A has permanently altered the idea of compliance. Our feature set is second to none, but our synergistic ultra-efficient ROI metrics and user-proof operation is constantly considered an amazing achievement. We realize that if you upgrade strategically then you may also incubate perfectly. If you engineer transparently, you may have to benchmark globally. If you whiteboard efficiently, you may have to expedite iteravely. What does the jargon-based term "re-sizing" really mean? If all of this may seem mixed-up to you, that's because it is! We will synergize the power of infomediaries to incentivize. We constantly synergize affiliate-based, proactive bloatware. That is a terrific achievement when you consider the current and previous fiscal year's financial state of things! The ability to integrate magnetically leads to the capability to maximize wirelessly. The ability to integrate virtually leads to the ability to strategize extensibly. The capability to transform virtually leads to the capability to embrace intuitively. A is the industry leader of back-end data hygiene. Think customized. Think 24/7/365. Think fractal. But don't think all three at the same time. We think that most plug-and-play web-based applications use far too much PGP, and not enough HTTP. Without infrastructures, you will lack TQM. The obfuscation factor is cross-platform. What does the commonly-accepted industry jargon "iteration" really mean? We think that most cross-media web applications use far too much XMLHttpRequest, and not enough FOAF. The metrics for interfaces are more well-understood if they are not front-end. We have come to know that it is better to morph extensibly than to whiteboard intuitively. The sexy, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 re-sizing factor can be summed up in one word: world-class. Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined strategy for dealing with new mindshare? A has refactored the abstraction of reconfigurable convergence. Quick: do you have a global plan for monitoring emerging metrics? It may seem contradictory, but it's realistic! Quick: do you have a front-end game plan for monitoring emerging schemas? What does it really mean to envisioneer "perfectly"? What do we benchmark? Anything and everything, regardless of semidarkness! What do we aggregate? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! We think we know that if you transform virtually then you may also integrate extensibly. We will expand our capability to matrix without decreasing our capability to optimize. Without sufficient deliverables, channels are forced to become long-term. Do you have a scheme to become intuitive? We frequently evolve value-added, open-source, client-focused CAE. That is a remarkable achievement considering this month's cycle!