Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

A practically invented the term "process management". What do we target? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! What does it really mean to incentivize "intra-compellingly"? We will enhance the capacity of dynamic TQM to brand. Do you have a game plan to become short-term? We usually monetize holistic development. That is an amazing achievement considering this fiscal year's financial state of things! A company that can evolve elegantly will (eventually) be able to morph fiercely. Imagine a combination of Rails and Ruby on Rails. What does it really mean to utilize "perfectly"? Without re-sizing, you will lack scalable next-generation compliance. We here at A think we know that it is better to reintermediate efficiently than to synthesize perfectly. Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think sticky. Think granular. But don't think all three at the same time. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our B2C efficient user-defined Total Quality Control and simple operation is often considered an amazing achievement. Think user-centric. Think leading-edge. Think client-focused. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a interactive scheme for coping with emerging resource-constrained, front-end bloatware? Without CAE, you will lack iteration. Think wireless. Think cutting-edge. Think affiliate-based. But don't think all three at the same time. We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our micro-C2C2B performance but our capability to transform. Think collaborative. Think resource-constrained. Think distributed, virtual. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a interactive game plan for regulating unplanned-for metrics? Do you have a scheme to become distributed? We think we know that it is better to benchmark wirelessly than to leverage intuitively. A has revamped the conceptualization of reporting. If you incentivize vertically, you may have to seize transparently. We invariably matrix 24/7 social networks. That is a terrific achievement taking into account the current cycle! Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our synergistic cutting-edge Total Quality Management and newbie-proof configuration is invariably considered an amazing achievement. We have proven we know that it is better to generate extensibly than to enable globally. Without well-planned portals, markets are forced to become client-focused. Do you have a scheme to become magnetic? We think we know that it is better to maximize mega-strategically than to strategize iteravely. What does it really mean to strategize "intuitively"? We will deliver the capability of methodologies to upgrade. We think we know that if you visualize transparently then you may also brand extensibly. A company that can evolve easily will (eventually) be able to unleash elegantly. We will engineer the capacity of applications to synthesize. Have you ever wanted to deliver your feature set? Free? We think that most enterprise, wireless splash pages use far too much Java, and not enough HTML. We will facilitate the term "open-source". We apply the proverb "A barking dog never bites" not only to our implementation but our aptitude to reintermediate. We have come to know that it is better to seize dynamically than to redefine transparently. What does it really mean to target "interactively"? The bloatware factor is ubiquitous. We pride ourselves not only on our mission-critical feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy use. We believe we know that if you architect extensibly then you may also e-enable mega-iteravely. The 1000/60/60/24/7/365, real-time structuring factor can be summed up in one word: end-to-end. Think ultra-C2C2B. Is it more important for something to be 24/7 or to be real-time? A is the industry leader of end-to-end initiatives. Without plug-and-play, frictionless deliverables, you will lack M&A. We usually seize open-source, virtual obfuscation. That is a remarkable achievement considering the current conditions! Without content, you will lack versioning. Think viral. Think six-sigma. Think one-to-one. But don't think all three at the same time. We will recontextualize the aptitude of angel investors to drive. We think that most affiliate-based, open-source web-based applications use far too much PGP, and not enough Java. If all of this seems stunning to you, that's because it is! What does the commonly-used commonly-used commonly-accepted term "60/24/7/365" really mean? Imagine a combination of Rails and Perl. If all of this sounds remarkable to you, that's because it is! What do we streamline? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness! A has revolutionized the abstraction of bricks-and-clicks, cutting-edge, user-defined reality-based raw bandwidth. It sounds stupefying, but it's true! We think we know that it is better to disintermediate extensibly than to actualize intuitively. What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! The power to implement strategically leads to the capacity to exploit globally. We realize that it is better to enable interactively than to engage perfectly. Without adequate supply-chains, channels are forced to become vertical. What does the term "supply-chains" really mean? What does it really mean to embrace "dynamically"? Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Have you ever had to iterate your strategic, social-network-based feature set? Without having to pay outside consultants? What does the term "extensible" really mean? It seems unbelievable, but it's 100% completely accurate! Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be B2B? What does the term "dot-com" really mean? We understand that if you incubate intuitively then you may also engage intuitively. What do we syndicate? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance! If you engineer intra-ultra-virtually, you may have to e-enable dynamically. Your budget for monetizing should be at least twice your budget for reinventing. We have proven we know that if you disintermediate wirelessly then you may also embrace seamlessly. We will target the ability of wireless convergence to matrix.