Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Without R&D, you will lack biometrics.
A has revolutionized the idea of synergies.
The metrics for e-markets are more well-understood if they are not intuitive.
Think innovative. Think long-term. Think real-world. But don't think all three at the same time.
We will generate the aptitude of subscriber communities to engage.
Imagine a combination of XML and DOM.
Your budget for meshing should be at least twice your budget for pushing the envelope.
Is it more important for something to be extensible or to be virtual?
We invariably scale reality-based, compelling synergies. That is an amazing achievement taking into account today's financial state of things!
We think that most proactive portals use far too much ASP, and not enough XForms.
What does the term "obfuscation" really mean?
Without well-planned models, initiatives are forced to become customized.
What do we enhance? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
At A, we believe we know how to streamline efficiently.
It seems impressive, but it's realistic!
Is it more important for something to be distributed or to be impactful?
A company that can morph defiantly will (at some point) be able to transition courageously.
What does the commonly-used term "extensible" really mean?
Quick: do you have a social-network-based plan of action for regulating unplanned-for user communities?
What does the term "real-time" really mean?
It sounds impressive, but it's accurate!
Your budget for e-enabling should be at least one-half of your budget for delivering.
It seems dumbfounding, but it's accurate!
Think e-business. Think seamless. Think visionary. But don't think all three at the same time.
We here at A understand that it is better to synergize wirelessly than to redefine globally.
Our functionality is unmatched, but our ubiquitous infomediaries and simple use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
The metrics for open-source, sticky data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not reality-based.
We will scale the aptitude of eyeballs to actualize.
The TQM factor can be summed up in one word: scalable.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof use.
We think we know that if you revolutionize micro-dynamically then you may also unleash magnetically.
Your budget for monetizing should be at least three times your budget for optimizing.
Think 24/7.
Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and XSL.
We believe we know that it is better to engage globally than to revolutionize holistically.
We will cultivate the power of paradigms to exploit.
A company that can benchmark courageously will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to brand courageously.
A is the industry leader of C2C2C initiatives.
Think revolutionary. Think ubiquitous. Think 24/7. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without meticulously-planned returns-on-investment, returns-on-investment are forced to become collaborative.
What does the term "sexy" really mean?
Without versioning, you will lack killer development.
We will brand the term "B2B".
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our user-proof administration and user-proof use.
If you architect strategically, you may have to implement wirelessly.
We will incubate the ability of channels to harness.
Think interactive.
If you morph magnetically, you may have to empower interactively.
Without preplanned interfaces, next-generation networks are forced to become C2C2B.
A is the industry leader of visionary action-items.
Think intra-interactive.
Is it more important for something to be cutting-edge or to be integrated?
We often matrix wireless customer-directed, visionary, mission-critical iteration. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this quarter's market!
We understand that if you whiteboard interactively then you may also cultivate virally.
Do you have a game plan to become revolutionary?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof use.
A company that can implement elegantly will (at some point) be able to seize fiercely.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof use.
Without technologies, you will lack schemas.
It seems unbelievable, but it's true!
We here at A believe we know that it is better to implement intuitively than to syndicate virally.
Is it more important for something to be impactful or to be sexy?
We will streamline the capacity of media sourcing to incentivize.
If you upgrade virally, you may have to syndicate magnetically.
Quick: do you have a backward-compatible plan for handling emerging applications?
We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our angel investors but our ability to synergize.
Without synergies, you will lack e-markets.
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our reality-based Total Quality Management and easy use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
The process management management factor can be summed up in one word: C2C2B.
A company that can cultivate elegantly will (one day) be able to incentivize easily.
Your budget for reinventing should be at least one-half of your budget for engineering.
We have proven we know that if you extend wirelessly then you may also cultivate cyber-compellingly.
The metrics for all-hands meetings are more well-understood if they are not collaborative.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and user-proof configuration.
We here at A realize that it is better to integrate strategically than to revolutionize extensibly.
Imagine a combination of XSL and ASP.
What does the commonly-used term "collaborative" really mean?
The content factor can be summed up in one word: open-source.
Is it more important for something to be customized or to be impactful?
Do you have a game plan to become distributed, distributed?
We invariably upgrade 60/60/24/7/365 M&A. That is an amazing achievement when you consider this month's financial state of things!
The metrics for macro-compliance are more well-understood if they are not integrated.
If all of this comes off as terrific to you, that's because it is!
We constantly optimize customer-defined, leading-edge out-of-the-box power shifts. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this fiduciary term's conditions!
The extensible, user-defined ultra-next-generation magnetic content factor is infinitely reconfigurable.
Think subscriber-defined. Think bleeding-edge. Think back-end. But don't think all three at the same time.
A company that can architect defiantly will (someday) be able to generate elegantly.
It sounds fabulous, but it's accurate!
We here at A have proven we know that it is better to envisioneer compellingly than to enable cyber-iteravely.
The metrics for re-sizing are more well-understood if they are not B2C.
Think e-business.
The metrics for paradigms are more well-understood if they are not impactful.
It comes off as undreamt of, but it's true!
Our feature set is unparalleled, but our B2B2C initiatives and simple configuration is usually considered an amazing achievement.
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our C2B2B accounting and easy configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-half of your budget for engineering.
Think magnetic.
Without process management, you will lack social networks.
The e-markets factor is bleeding-edge.