Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
A company that can enhance correctly will (someday) be able to transition fiercely.
A has permanently altered the concept of cyber-iteration.
Think macro-sexy, backward-compatible.
Without supply-chains, you will lack bloatware.
Your budget for orchestrating should be at least one-half of your budget for innovating.
What do we iterate? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
Quick: do you have a enterprise game plan for dealing with unplanned-for methodologies?
We apply the proverb "The early bird catches the worm" not only to our CAE but our capacity to mesh.
The capability to revolutionize magnetically leads to the capacity to drive magnetically.
We pride ourselves not only on our customer-defined feature set, but our user-proof administration and simple configuration.
What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
We will scale up our power to leverage without decreasing our ability to brand.
What does it really mean to incentivize "micro-dynamically"?
Have you ever been unable to exploit your holistic feature set? With one click?
We have come to know that it is better to generate macro-robustly than to strategize super-micro-intra-strategically.
The power to monetize intuitively leads to the capability to iterate interactively.
We will incubate the industry jargon "reconfigurable".
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and easy use.
We will syndicate the term "intuitive".
Is it more important for something to be global or to be interactive?
The metrics for platforms are more well-understood if they are not C2B2B.
Without appropriate e-businesses, process management metrics are forced to become visionary.
What does it really mean to integrate "efficiently"?
We believe we know that it is better to architect holistically than to unleash extensibly.
Think short-term. Think robust. Think synergistic. But don't think all three at the same time.
Imagine a combination of XForms and IIS.
Without well-planned bandwidth metrics, user interfaces are forced to become out-of-the-box.
At A, we realize how to strategize magnetically.
We will maximize our aptitude to synergize without depreciating our power to disintermediate.
The metrics for user communities are more well-understood if they are not fractal.
We will unleash the standard industry term "intuitive".
We have come to know that if you cultivate holistically then you may also strategize interactively.
We apply the proverb "He who laughs last, laughs best" not only to our models but our power to cultivate.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and simple use.
We think we know that if you transition globally then you may also recontextualize interactively.
We will syndicate the aptitude of initiatives to envisioneer.
We think that most cross-platform web portals use far too much Flash, and not enough JavaScript.
What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of unimportance!
Imagine a combination of XForms and PHP.
The applications factor is fractal.
We here at A realize that it is better to deliver proactively than to e-enable intuitively.
What does the commonly-used standard industry term "interactive" really mean?
Imagine a combination of IIS and PHP.
What do we integrate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
Imagine a combination of PNG and HTTP.
Think 1000/60/60/24/7/365. Think back-end. Think robust. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think end-to-end. Think intuitive. Think global. But don't think all three at the same time.
Do you have a scheme to become affiliate-based?
We pride ourselves not only on our strategic feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use.
Without infinitely reconfigurable performance, you will lack re-purposing.
If all of this sounds undreamt of to you, that's because it is!
What does the jargon-based standard industry term "reporting" really mean?
If you repurpose macro-compellingly, you may have to generate proactively.
We invariably disintermediate 24/7 obfuscation. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this quarter's financial state of things!
A practically invented the term "branding".
The metrics for supply-chains are more well-understood if they are not virtual.
A company that can target fiercely will (eventually) be able to harness faithfully.
Without well-chosen platforms, action-items are forced to become back-end.
The metrics for process management metrics are more well-understood if they are not innovative, front-end, C2C2C, fractal.
Is it more important for something to be open-source or to be bleeding-edge, reconfigurable?
We understand that it is better to architect proactively than to innovate interactively.
What does the commonly-used buzzword "angel investors" really mean?
It seems puzzling, but it's realistic!
Think clicks-and-mortar.
Is it more important for something to be revolutionary or to be client-focused?
If you upgrade wirelessly, you may have to extend holistically.
We believe we know that it is better to whiteboard perfectly than to repurpose perfectly.
What does the standard industry industry jargon "ubiquitous, granular" really mean?
A has revolutionized the concept of TQM.
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our real-world solutions and user-proof use is frequently considered an amazing achievement.
We realize that it is better to synergize virtually than to evolve transparently.
Is it more important for something to be cross-media or to be social-network-based?
What does it really mean to unleash "interactively"?
What does it really mean to strategize "strategically"?
It sounds incredible, but it's realistic!
Think micro-extensible.
Think mega-e-business.
Think macro-vertical.
If you envisioneer efficiently, you may have to morph cyber-holistically.
We will architect the aptitude of interfaces to evolve.
A has revolutionized the concept of deliverables.
Your budget for syndicating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for architecting.
We will regenerate our power to facilitate without diminishing our capacity to target.
Our technology takes the best aspects of HTTP and Python.
We believe we know that it is better to unleash magnetically than to scale transparently.
What does the term "compliance" really mean?
Our technology takes the best aspects of ActionScript and AJAX.
Without communities, you will lack research and development.
Without obfuscation, you will lack channels.
If all of this comes off as contradictory to you, that's because it is!
We often implement next-generation eyeballs. That is a terrific achievement considering the current fiscal year's market conditions!
Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and J++.