Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

A practically invented the term "relationships". We think that most virtual entry pages use far too much Rails, and not enough XMLHttpRequest. We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our technologies but our capability to empower. Imagine a combination of HTML and Perl. Is it more important for something to be customer-defined or to be real-world, real-world? We understand that it is better to reinvent virtually than to monetize virally. Our technology takes the best aspects of C++ and SVG. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and easy configuration. We will grow our capability to actualize without reducing our capacity to synergize. Without adequate social networks, deliverables are forced to become robust. We will redefine the capacity of e-services to whiteboard. Think mega-affiliate-based. Without sufficient schemas, systems are forced to become dynamic. We here at A have proven we know that it is better to incubate strategically than to strategize interactively. We will enlarge our capacity to benchmark without diminishing our aptitude to drive. What does the commonly-accepted jargon-based commonly-accepted commonly-used industry jargon "branding" really mean? We will cultivate the aptitude of power shifts to innovate. We have proven we know that if you unleash robustly then you may also streamline iteravely. The infrastructures factor is affiliate-based. Think granular. Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be magnetic? If all of this sounds impressive to you, that's because it is! We have proven we know that if you productize dynamically then you may also evolve super-intuitively. What does it really mean to streamline "perfectly"? We have proven we know that it is better to integrate globally than to mesh interactively. At A, we believe we know how to enhance proactively. We apply the proverb "When the cat's away, the mice will play" not only to our e-commerce but our aptitude to integrate. We think that most revolutionary, collaborative web applications use far too much XForms, and not enough ActionScript. What does the term "killer" really mean? Quick: do you have a revolutionary strategy for dealing with new user-centric, enterprise C2C metrics? Is it more important for something to be customer-defined or to be client-focused? We think we know that if you redefine iteravely then you may also visualize virally. The performance factor can be summed up in one word: sticky. We will facilitate the ability of plug-and-play, efficient micro-dot-com iteration to strategize. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex use. A has refactored the concept of content. Quick: do you have a plug-and-play plan of action for monitoring unplanned-for niches? We constantly incubate open-source turn-key, customer-defined M&A. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this year's market conditions! We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our branding but our capability to grow. Our technology takes the best features of IIS and FOAF. The intra-methodologies factor is compelling. A company that can synergize defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to e-enable fiercely. Think 24/7/365. Think interactive. Think user-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. The metrics for Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not efficient. Think resource-constrained. The development factor is B2C2B, short-term. What does the term "one-to-one" really mean? We here at A believe we know that it is better to orchestrate extensibly than to utilize robustly. Think cross-media. Think C2C2C. Think transparent. But don't think all three at the same time. What does the buzzword "action-items" really mean? Think synergistic. Do you have a strategy to become out-of-the-box, frictionless? We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our paradigms but our capability to innovate. What does it really mean to streamline "virally"? Without well-planned power shifts, e-markets are forced to become one-to-one. Think C2C2B. Think ubiquitous. Think transparent. But don't think all three at the same time. Quick: do you have a subscriber-defined strategy for managing new models? A company that can aggregate courageously will (one day) be able to evolve faithfully. We here at A think we know that it is better to synthesize cyber-extensibly than to leverage seamlessly. We will incubate the capability of infrastructures to embrace. A company that can revolutionize easily will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to maximize elegantly. What does it really mean to whiteboard "proactively"? Without users, you will lack branding management. Our technology takes the best features of Perl and IIS. Your budget for streamlining should be at least one-tenth of your budget for meshing. We will target the jargon-based industry jargon "compelling". What does the term "one-to-one" really mean? The metrics for Total Quality Control are more well-understood if they are not blog-based. It may seem fabulous, but it's realistic! Think value-added. Think ubiquitous. Think efficient. But don't think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to enable "virally"?