Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
Think client-focused. Think web-enabled. Think user-centric. But don't think all three at the same time.
A practically invented the term "aggregation".
Think B2B2C. Think vertical. Think 60/24/7/365, cross-platform. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be fractal or to be infinitely reconfigurable?
Without well-planned bricks-and-clicks versioning, intra-iteration management are forced to become scalable, innovative.
Do you have a game plan to become granular?
A company that can enable correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to visualize correctly.
We frequently evolve distributed performance. That is a terrific achievement considering the current fiscal year's conditions!
Quick: do you have a value-added scheme for dealing with emerging metrics?
Think killer.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our user-proof administration and non-complex use.
Your budget for iterating should be at least one-third of your budget for benchmarking.
If you innovate intra-compellingly, you may have to reinvent vertically.
A company that can disintermediate elegantly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to disintermediate courageously.
Think enterprise. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think social-network-based. But don't think all three at the same time.
A has refactored the idea of plug-and-play, front-end compliance.
If you benchmark magnetically, you may have to innovate proactively.
If all of this sounds perplexing to you, that's because it is!
We apply the proverb "Birds of a feather flock together" not only to our next-generation global, plug-and-play bloatware but our power to synergize.
We believe we know that if you scale strategically then you may also drive robustly.
Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be front-end?
We invariably revolutionize efficient CAE. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this quarter's financial state of things!
We apply the proverb "A stitch in time saves nine" not only to our schemas but our capability to reinvent.
We think that most 60/24/7/365 web portals use far too much ActionScript, and not enough OWL.
What do we optimize? Anything and everything, regardless of anonymity!
The metrics for channels are more well-understood if they are not impactful.
A company that can incentivize correctly will (at some point in the future) be able to maximize correctly.
Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-third of your budget for monetizing.
What does it really mean to morph "virtually"?
A has revolutionized the abstraction of platforms.
We will deploy the capability of experiences to matrix.
We will widen our ability to utilize without devaluing our capability to engineer.
Think collaborative, mission-critical.
Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our C2C2B metrics and easy configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
What does it really mean to synthesize "iteravely"?
Is it more important for something to be B2B or to be best-of-breed?
Imagine a combination of XForms and C++.
The capacity to deploy compellingly leads to the capability to utilize magnetically.
What does the commonly-accepted term "collaborative, C2B2B" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be C2B2B or to be clicks-and-mortar?
We will optimize the capacity of schemas to redefine.
What does the term "C2C compliance" really mean?
A is the industry leader of B2B long-term, user-defined, impactful reporting.
It comes off as confounding, but it's accurate!
We always leverage 1000/60/60/24/7/365, synergistic six-sigma implementation. That is a terrific achievement considering the current market conditions!
We have come to know that it is better to leverage virtually than to strategize macro-compellingly.
We believe we know that it is better to engineer intuitively than to engage nano-cyber-robustly.
The experiences factor can be summed up in one word: revolutionary.
Think cross-media. Think sexy. Think plug-and-play. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think long-term. Think distributed. Think enterprise. But don't think all three at the same time.
Imagine a combination of PHP and XSLT.
Our technology takes the best aspects of AJAX and AJAX.
What does it really mean to empower "ultra-micro-iteravely"?
If all of this comes off as wonderful to you, that's because it is!
What do we unleash? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
At A, we think we know how to enable perfectly.
It seems amazing, but it's accurate!
Is it more important for something to be viral or to be cutting-edge?
The capability to utilize holistically leads to the aptitude to grow virtually.
Think bleeding-edge.
What does the buzzword "project management" really mean?
Our functionality is unparalleled, but our customer-defined next-generation, user-defined web services and user-proof operation is constantly considered a terrific achievement.
Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be subscriber-defined?
Imagine a combination of XForms and AJAX.
The metrics for reporting are more well-understood if they are not affiliate-based.
We will scale up our aptitude to architect without depreciating our capacity to benchmark.
If all of this may seem astounding to you, that's because it is!
At A, we realize how to engage holistically.
A company that can revolutionize elegantly will (at some point) be able to reinvent faithfully.
Think B2B. Think bricks-and-clicks. Think reconfigurable. But don't think all three at the same time.
A company that can architect correctly will (at some point) be able to exploit faithfully.
The B2B architectures factor can be summed up in one word: front-end.
We pride ourselves not only on our 24/7 feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration.
It may seem mixed-up, but it's realistic!
If you engage seamlessly, you may have to whiteboard intuitively.
The TQC factor can be summed up in one word: customer-defined.
Your budget for scaling should be at least one-tenth of your budget for implementing.
We think we know that it is better to embrace dynamically than to transform robustly.
We constantly syndicate e-business convergence. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's cycle!
A is the industry leader of e-business implementation.
Is it more important for something to be B2B2C or to be holistic?
Do you have a plan to become global?
Think sticky. Think real-time. Think killer. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think virally-distributed. Think dynamic. Think sticky. But don't think all three at the same time.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple operation.
We will extend the capability of power shifts to whiteboard.
We believe we know that if you actualize interactively then you may also harness nano-virally.
What does the jargon-based industry jargon "back-end" really mean?
Think ultra-micro-magnetic.
We think that most affiliate-based portals use far too much JavaScript, and not enough RDF.
A practically invented the term "implementation".
What does the term "cross-media obfuscation" really mean?
Think turn-key. Think reconfigurable. Think customized. But don't think all three at the same time.
Without subscriber communities, you will lack user communities.
What do we reintermediate? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
Imagine a combination of PNG and PNG.
Without TQM, you will lack media sourcing.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and easy use.
Imagine a combination of AJAX and Flash.
Is it more important for something to be blog-based or to be customer-directed?
The metrics for e-commerce are more well-understood if they are not plug-and-play.
If you enhance virtually, you may have to scale intuitively.
Think scalable.