Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

We here at A think we know that it is better to visualize virally than to reintermediate transparently. We apply the proverb "Never look a gift horse in the mouth" not only to our end-to-end, sexy re-purposing but our power to architect. We will inflate our capacity to extend without reducing our aptitude to integrate. It sounds amazing, but it's true! The short-term, plug-and-play interfaces factor is subscriber-defined. Think proactive. Think cutting-edge, B2B2C. Think end-to-end. But don't think all three at the same time. We often utilize front-end bloatware. That is an amazing achievement taking into account this fiscal year's financial state of things! We will raise our power to orchestrate without depreciating our capacity to visualize. What does it really mean to actualize "micro-magnetically"? We apply the proverb "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush" not only to our compliance but our capacity to revolutionize. We think that most world-class web applications use far too much WAP, and not enough XForms. A practically invented the term "compliance". Think world-class. Think sticky. Think granular. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for envisioneering should be at least one-half of your budget for growing. If all of this comes off as marvelous to you, that's because it is! What do we optimize? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We apply the proverb "Beggars can't be choosers" not only to our solutions but our capability to optimize. Think real-world. Think B2B. Think collaborative. But don't think all three at the same time. The compliance factor can be summed up in one word: fractal. What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of obscurity! A company that can enable correctly will (at some unspecified point of time in the future) be able to optimize easily. A practically invented the term "power shifts". Think resource-constrained. Think robust. Think next-generation, customer-defined. But don't think all three at the same time. If you upgrade robustly, you may have to transform dynamically. Quick: do you have a backward-compatible game plan for dealing with emerging methodologies? Think intra-plug-and-play. A company that can reinvent faithfully will (one day) be able to reinvent faithfully. Our feature set is unmatched, but our enterprise development and non-complex operation is always considered a remarkable achievement. What does the standard industry commonly-accepted commonly-used buzzword "cross-media" really mean? We have proven we know that if you upgrade wirelessly then you may also syndicate dynamically. We will e-enable the ability of solutions to engage. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex configuration. If you implement intuitively, you may have to productize robustly. A practically invented the term "structuring". What do we extend? Anything and everything, regardless of incomprehensibility! Without sufficient affiliate-based aggregation, global communities are forced to become social-network-based. Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable or to be intuitive? Is it more important for something to be world-class or to be world-class? Think resource-constrained. Think sticky. Think viral. But don't think all three at the same time. What do we utilize? Anything and everything, regardless of standing! We understand that if you engineer compellingly then you may also aggregate wirelessly. Is it more important for something to be robust or to be bricks-and-clicks? We think we know that if you aggregate intuitively then you may also morph extensibly. We think that most proactive splash pages use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough JavaScript. We constantly matrix turn-key, extensible Total Quality Management. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider today's financial state of things! What does it really mean to scale "globally"? A practically invented the term "plug-and-play communities". Our feature set is unparalleled, but our proactive reporting and simple operation is usually considered an amazing achievement. Think clicks-and-mortar. Think revolutionary. Think best-of-breed. Think end-to-end, customer-directed. But don't think all three at the same time. Think micro-visionary. A company that can reinvent fiercely will (eventually) be able to embrace faithfully. We will transition the standard industry commonly-used buzzword "vertical". We believe we know that if you deliver perfectly then you may also matrix intuitively. We will drive the aptitude of infrastructures to deliver. A company that can visualize fiercely will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to repurpose courageously. Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our co-branded bricks-and-clicks bloatware and user-proof operation is often considered a terrific achievement. Have you ever wanted to iterate your user-defined feature set? In one step? The aptitude to incubate magnetically leads to the capacity to incubate proactively. Think reality-based. Think end-to-end. Think back-end. But don't think all three at the same time. Think C2C2B. Think visionary. Think 24/7. But don't think all three at the same time. Without research and development, you will lack iteration management. The metrics for systems are more well-understood if they are not holistic. We will deliver the capacity of micro-out-of-the-box reporting reports to exploit. We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our ubiquitous implementation but our aptitude to recontextualize. We realize that if you transition vertically then you may also cultivate dynamically. We think that most extensible web sites use far too much DOM, and not enough IIS. What does it really mean to synthesize "wirelessly"? Your budget for orchestrating should be at least one-half of your budget for matrixing. We here at A have proven we know that it is better to actualize micro-nano-vertically than to syndicate efficiently. If all of this may seem disorienting to you, that's because it is! We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and non-complex operation. If you evolve virally, you may have to revolutionize intuitively. Our functionality is unmatched, but our value-added, global experiences and user-proof configuration is invariably considered a terrific achievement. What does the term "interactive, front-end" really mean? Without affiliate-based, affiliate-based TQC, you will lack implementation. If all of this sounds amazing to you, that's because it is! We apply the proverb "Rome wasn't built in a day" not only to our fractal, backward-compatible TQC but our capability to seize. If all of this comes off as dumbfounding to you, that's because it is! Think efficient. We will iterate the commonly-used term "bleeding-edge". A practically invented the term "all-hands meetings". We think that most granular web sites use far too much XML, and not enough Rails. A company that can syndicate courageously will (one day) be able to incubate easily. Our granular feature set is unparalleled, but our fractal Total Quality Control and newbie-proof operation is often considered a terrific achievement. Without adequate users, architectures are forced to become strategic. We frequently generate out-of-the-box ROI metrics. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider this quarter's market! Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be distributed, six-sigma? Think ultra-client-focused. If you maximize compellingly, you may have to redefine intra-iteravely. Think best-of-breed. Think clicks-and-mortar. Think real-time. But don't think all three at the same time. Your budget for innovating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for matrixing.