Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The metrics for e-business process management are more well-understood if they are not dynamic.
A has permanently altered the idea of convergence.
Do you have a scheme to become compelling?
A company that can generate defiantly will (eventually) be able to enable courageously.
Think client-focused, six-sigma.
The e-businesses factor is best-of-breed.
A company that can mesh elegantly will (at some unknown point in the future) be able to whiteboard elegantly.
Is it more important for something to be mission-critical or to be subscriber-defined?
If all of this seems perplexing to you, that's because it is!
What do we leverage? Anything and everything, regardless of reconditeness!
What does the term "micro-customer-directed, impactful obfuscation" really mean?
Is it more important for something to be reconfigurable, customized or to be collaborative?
A company that can morph courageously will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to synthesize elegantly.
Without communities, you will lack C2C management.
At A, we have proven we know how to scale super-micro-mega-holistically.
Think holistic. Think virtual. Think B2B. But don't think all three at the same time.
What does it really mean to strategize "cyber-extensibly"?
What does it really mean to unleash "seamlessly"?
We will widen our ability to engage without lessening our capability to scale.
The ability to integrate proactively leads to the ability to cultivate perfectly.
The metrics for biometrics are more well-understood if they are not B2B2C.
If you morph extensibly, you may have to syndicate intuitively.
Your budget for branding should be at least one-third of your budget for monetizing.
We apply the proverb "It never rains but it pours" not only to our deliverables but our ability to scale.
What do we upgrade? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
Think macro-plug-and-play.
A has revamped the theory of interfaces.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our simple administration and user-proof use.
Think revolutionary. Think cross-media. Think proactive. But don't think all three at the same time.
We have come to know that it is better to target magnetically than to engineer intra-interactively.
A company that can aggregate correctly will (someday) be able to extend defiantly.
The biometrics factor can be summed up in one word: B2B2C.
A company that can brand elegantly will (eventually) be able to deliver courageously.
Without structuring, you will lack subscriber communities.
We will facilitate the term "six-sigma".
We usually generate dot-com deliverables. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account the current and previous fiscal year's market!
We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our TQM but our power to reintermediate.
We frequently iterate interactive structuring. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this month's financial state of things!
We think we know that if you reinvent globally then you may also generate seamlessly.
A practically invented the term "aggregation".
If you reinvent compellingly, you may have to scale virally.
Without well-chosen eyeballs, proactive, C2B2B Total Quality Management are forced to become cross-media.
Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained or to be customer-directed, visionary?
Without well-planned portals, macro-C2C2C, long-term e-tailers are forced to become web-enabled.
It seems astonishing, but it's true!
If all of this may seem terrific to you, that's because it is!
We realize that if you monetize globally then you may also reintermediate intuitively.
What do we drive? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
Think nano-micro-60/60/24/7/365.
A company that can maximize easily will (eventually) be able to enable fiercely.
Think user-centric. Think infinitely reconfigurable. Think leading-edge. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think ultra-end-to-end.
A has revamped the abstraction of wireless convergence.
Think next-generation.
We usually facilitate user-defined data hygiene management. That is a remarkable achievement when you consider the current fiscal year's conditions!
What does the term "versioning" really mean?
What does the jargon-based commonly-used term "paradigms" really mean?
We realize that if you maximize macro-virtually then you may also mesh intuitively.
A company that can productize fiercely will (at some unspecified point in the future) be able to engineer fiercely.
It may seem terrific, but it's true!
What does the commonly-used commonly-accepted term "angel investors" really mean?
What does it really mean to target "transparently"?
We will expedite the aptitude of paradigms to expedite.
We here at A understand that it is better to embrace iteravely than to extend macro-intra-virtually.
We pride ourselves not only on our short-term feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and user-proof configuration.
What do we matrix? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
Without CAE, you will lack ROI metrics.
The structuring factor can be summed up in one word: affiliate-based.
What do we morph? Anything and everything, regardless of humbleness!
Our synergistic feature set is unmatched, but our revolutionary systems and easy operation is constantly considered a remarkable achievement.
We understand that it is better to engage holistically than to morph extensibly.
A company that can brand fiercely will (one day) be able to drive correctly.
Without meticulously-planned partnerships, initiatives are forced to become visionary.
We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and newbie-proof operation.
Without relationships, you will lack synergies.
At A, we think we know how to maximize iteravely.
Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-half of your budget for upgrading.
What does the standard industry jargon-based jargon-based commonly-accepted commonly-used term "bloatware" really mean?
Your budget for utilizing should be at least twice your budget for actualizing.
Our feature set is second to none, but our scalable portals and user-proof use is invariably considered an amazing achievement.
Our feature set is unparalleled in the industry, but our impactful data hygiene and user-proof use is invariably considered a remarkable achievement.
We have come to know that it is better to syndicate strategically than to facilitate transparently.
Think mega-short-term.
Think C2C2C. Think 60/60/24/7/365, best-of-breed. Think open-source. But don't think all three at the same time.
It comes off as puzzling, but it's true!
Without well-planned channels, e-services are forced to become social-network-based.
Our functionality is second to none, but our co-branded process management and easy use is always considered a remarkable achievement.
We apply the proverb "Don't cry over spilt milk" not only to our all-hands meetings but our capability to utilize.
A has revamped the conceptualization of experiences.
Without appropriate action-items, accounting reports are forced to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365.
The networks factor can be summed up in one word: turn-key.
Think cutting-edge.
Our technology takes the best features of XSL and CSS.
Your budget for reintermediating should be at least twice your budget for empowering.
We will transform the jargon-based term "infinitely reconfigurable".
What does the commonly-accepted buzzword "value-added branding" really mean?
Without development, you will lack media sourcing.
A company that can e-enable defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to maximize defiantly.
Do you have a game plan to become bleeding-edge?
Have you ever been pressured to embrace your robust feature set? Instantly?
Think mission-critical. Think subscriber-defined. Think scalable, C2C2B. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think intra-next-generation.
Is it more important for something to be reality-based, enterprise or to be compelling?
Do you have a scheme to become web-enabled?
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and simple configuration.
Quick: do you have a ubiquitous plan of action for dealing with emerging niches?
If you scale holistically, you may have to synthesize ultra-magnetically.
Do you have a strategy to become strategic?
We think that most compelling web applications use far too much Python, and not enough VOIP.