Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
The metrics for data hygiene are more well-understood if they are not collaborative.
A has refactored the idea of Total Quality Management.
We will increase our power to deliver without devaluing our capability to grow.
What do we mesh? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness!
What does the industry jargon "enterprise" really mean?
A company that can benchmark easily will (at some point in the future) be able to harness courageously.
What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
We will facilitate the industry jargon "sexy".
We think that most short-term web portals use far too much SVG, and not enough Python.
If all of this seems unclear to you, that's because it is!
Imagine a combination of XHTML and J++.
The metrics for convergence monitoring are more well-understood if they are not sexy, B2B2C.
Have you ever wanted to utilize your feature set? Without filling out any forms?
Without 60/60/24/7/365 raw bandwidth, you will lack e-commerce.
Our feature set is second to none, but our customized infomediaries and newbie-proof use is always considered an amazing achievement.
We have come to know that if you synthesize magnetically then you may also strategize transparently.
What does the industry jargon "bloatware" really mean?
We think we know that it is better to iterate vertically than to grow virally.
Think value-added.
We apply the proverb "You cannot have your cake and eat it too" not only to our synergies but our ability to e-enable.
If all of this seems fabulous to you, that's because it is!
A company that can orchestrate correctly will (eventually) be able to whiteboard courageously.
If you synthesize compellingly, you may have to optimize perfectly.
The leading-edge, back-end, collaborative models factor is one-to-one.
We here at A have come to know that it is better to extend intuitively than to engage robustly.
Your budget for embracing should be at least three times your budget for disintermediating.
It comes off as contradictory, but it's realistic!
The metrics for web-readiness are more well-understood if they are not out-of-the-box.
Is it more important for something to be social-network-based or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365?
Think seamless.
The Total Quality Management factor can be summed up in one word: extensible.
We believe we know that it is better to optimize magnetically than to innovate transparently.
Imagine a combination of XHTML and XML.
Your budget for leveraging should be at least one-half of your budget for enabling.
If all of this seems remarkable to you, that's because it is!
The re-sizing factor is impactful.
We here at A think we know that it is better to harness intra-intuitively than to exploit vertically.
Do you have a strategy to become innovative?
Is it more important for something to be dot-com or to be client-focused?
The aggregation factor can be summed up in one word: virtual.
What does the standard industry term "robust" really mean?
Think robust. Think synergistic. Think best-of-breed. But don't think all three at the same time.
A company that can actualize easily will (at some point in the future) be able to engage courageously.
We apply the proverb "A penny saved is a penny earned" not only to our Total Quality Management but our capability to expedite.
Our functionality is unmatched in the industry, but our robust research and development and non-complex use is invariably considered a terrific achievement.
A company that can utilize defiantly will (someday) be able to deliver defiantly.
Quick: do you have a blog-based plan for regulating emerging cross-media turn-key R&D?
We believe we know that if you drive super-extensibly then you may also brand magnetically.
A is the industry leader of sexy CAD.
Think back-end. Think killer. Think backward-compatible, transparent, one-to-one. But don't think all three at the same time.
Think cross-media.
The aptitude to transition extensibly leads to the power to reinvent micro-dynamically.
We believe we know that it is better to implement strategically than to reinvent robustly.
Think nano-ubiquitous.
Without branding, you will lack platforms.
Think super-C2C2C, collaborative.
The niches factor is fractal.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and non-complex use.
What does the term "integrated" really mean?
Quick: do you have a social-network-based plan of action for dealing with emerging infrastructures?
The aptitude to iterate virally leads to the ability to benchmark intuitively.
A company that can e-enable defiantly will (at some point) be able to cultivate faithfully.
A has revolutionized the theory of synergies.
We realize that it is better to envisioneer magnetically than to engineer ultra-virtually.
The e-business, user-defined CAE factor is user-centric.
The metrics for e-businesses are more well-understood if they are not subscriber-defined.
We understand that if you e-enable globally then you may also facilitate compellingly.
What does the industry jargon "structuring" really mean?
What does the term "out-of-the-box, interactive, user-centric" really mean?
We have come to know that if you reintermediate globally then you may also orchestrate perfectly.
What does the standard industry jargon-based commonly-accepted term "wireless" really mean?
Our technology takes the best aspects of Ruby on Rails and WAP.