Corporate Gibberish Generator™

Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click "Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)

Have you ever been pressured to embrace your feature set? Instantly? We will synergize the aptitude of nano-paradigms to incubate. Think cyber-cyber-visionary. We will inflate our ability to harness without reducing our power to iterate. If you orchestrate virally, you may have to monetize efficiently. If all of this seems astonishing to you, that's because it is! Without well-planned models, synergies are forced to become 60/24/7/365. Our feature set is unmatched, but our 60/60/24/7/365 scalable iteration and non-complex configuration is invariably considered a remarkable achievement. The capability to upgrade transparently leads to the power to incentivize dynamically. We realize that it is better to harness iteravely than to visualize intuitively. What does it really mean to morph "cyber-extensibly"? Quick: do you have a real-time plan of action for monitoring new visionary, viral impactful, B2B all-hands meetings? We here at 280 Group understand that it is better to leverage magnetically than to embrace globally. Think interactive. Our feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our granular platforms and simple configuration is frequently considered a remarkable achievement. We believe we know that it is better to synergize globally than to innovate virally. What does the jargon-based term "real-time" really mean? Your budget for repurposing should be at least one-half of your budget for integrating. Is it more important for something to be vertical or to be global? What do we enable? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness! We apply the proverb "Look before you leap" not only to our e-markets but our aptitude to revolutionize. Our functionality is unparalleled in the industry, but our 24/7 mega-data hygiene and user-proof use is often considered a remarkable achievement. Have you ever been pressured to envisioneer your feature set? Free? What does the buzzword "synergies" really mean? Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and SVG. Is it more important for something to be efficient, 60/60/24/7/365 or to be efficient? Is it more important for something to be leading-edge or to be virtual? What does the buzzword "turn-key, B2B2C development" really mean? The networks factor is B2C. Think ultra-short-term. Quick: do you have a e-business game plan for managing new relationships? Your budget for branding should be at least one-tenth of your budget for facilitating. Without content, you will lack R&D. A company that can utilize fiercely will (at some unknown point of time in the future) be able to synergize faithfully. The user interfaces factor can be summed up in one word: strategic. 280 Group practically invented the term "compliance". We apply the proverb "Absence makes the heart grow fonder" not only to our research and development but our capability to revolutionize. We pride ourselves not only on our dot-com feature set, but our newbie-proof administration and simple configuration. The bloatware factor can be summed up in one word: innovative, cutting-edge. What does the standard industry buzzword "efficient" really mean? Imagine a combination of OWL and XSL. It may seem confounding, but it's accurate! It may seem confounding, but it's accurate! Is it more important for something to be turn-key, sticky or to be bleeding-edge? Your budget for incentivizing should be at least one-third of your budget for transitioning. Our killer feature set is unmatched in the industry, but our synergistic content compliance and non-complex operation is usually considered a terrific achievement. 280 Group is the industry leader of ubiquitous infrastructures. The user communities factor is sticky. Without meticulously-planned reporting metrics, ROI metrics are forced to become ubiquitous. We usually visualize wireless solutions. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this fiduciary term's market! Think mega-1000/60/60/24/7/365. Imagine a combination of Flash and XMLHttpRequest. If all of this seems stupefying to you, that's because it is! What do we innovate? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! Think killer. What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of namelessness! We will actualize the commonly-accepted jargon-based commonly-used standard industry term "dot-com". We here at 280 Group have proven we know that it is better to reinvent magnetically than to target intra-perfectly. We will facilitate the term "robust". What does the term "real-world" really mean? What does it really mean to grow "macro-globally"? We have come to know that it is better to syndicate efficiently than to incentivize compellingly. Is it more important for something to be real-time or to be compelling? Is it more important for something to be resource-constrained or to be revolutionary? Without well-planned aggregation, user communities are forced to become 1000/60/60/24/7/365. We will add to our capacity to aggregate without devaluing our power to enhance. A company that can synergize defiantly will (at some point) be able to mesh fiercely. Without cross-media, intuitive all-hands meetings, you will lack project management. Without users, you will lack aggregation. 280 Group practically invented the term "CAE". The returns-on-investment factor is long-term. If you upgrade compellingly, you may have to transition iteravely. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and newbie-proof use. Think next-generation. Think viral. Think frictionless. But don't think all three at the same time. Is it more important for something to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365, subscriber-defined or to be six-sigma? Is it more important for something to be dynamic or to be turn-key? What does the commonly-used jargon-based term "re-sizing" really mean? Do you have a plan of action to become back-end? What does it really mean to scale "transparently"? We think we know that it is better to engage micro-wirelessly than to leverage iteravely.