Welcome to the Corporate Gibberish Generator™ by Andrew Davidson. andrewdavidson/at\andrewdavidson/dot\com
Enter your company name and click
"Generate" to generate several paragraphs of corporate gibberish
suitable for pasting into your prospectus.
(The gibberish is geared more toward Internet and technology companies.)
We think that most reconfigurable entry pages use far too much JavaScript, and not enough XSL.
We here at AssCo have come to know that it is better to exploit iteravely than to maximize robustly.
Without adequate experiences, relationships are forced to become virally-distributed.
Is it more important for something to be e-business or to be value-added?
Your budget for pushing the envelope should be at least three times your budget for strategizing.
Is it more important for something to be enterprise or to be backward-compatible?
Think backward-compatible.
Think ultra-subscriber-defined.
Without well-planned web-readiness, infinitely reconfigurable, B2B2C, web-enabled global subscriber-defined, next-generation, B2C, strategic project management are forced to become web-enabled.
We will expand our capability to expedite without diminishing our ability to enable.
Think mega-holistic.
What do we synergize? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
AssCo is the industry leader of efficient obfuscation.
It sounds stunning, but it's realistic!
We have proven we know that if you integrate virally then you may also expedite interactively.
We usually iterate vertical process management. That is a terrific achievement considering this quarter's financial state of things!
Without adequate relationships, metrics are forced to become B2B2C.
The CAD factor can be summed up in one word: value-added, e-business.
We frequently architect cross-media plug-and-play, holistic TQM. That is a remarkable achievement taking into account this quarter's cycle!
What does it really mean to syndicate "intuitively"?
If you harness holistically, you may have to harness intuitively.
Do you have a scheme to become viral?
Do you have a game plan to become compelling?
Is it more important for something to be reality-based, 1000/60/60/24/7/365 or to be world-class?
Imagine a combination of XForms and PHP.
Quick: do you have a bleeding-edge strategy for handling emerging e-business bandwidth?
We here at AssCo have come to know that it is better to optimize strategically than to target magnetically.
What does it really mean to incentivize "transparently"?
Without aggregation, you will lack deliverables.
We think we know that it is better to innovate intuitively than to target intra-micro-magnetically.
Quick: do you have a cross-platform scheme for monitoring new schemas?
It comes off as perplexing, but it's completely realistic!
If all of this sounds fabulous to you, that's because it is!
What does the jargon-based jargon-based buzzword "research and development" really mean?
Quick: do you have a open-source scheme for regulating emerging portals?
Without architectures, you will lack structuring metrics.
Your budget for matrixing should be at least twice your budget for iterating.
It seems remarkable, but it's accurate!
The ability to iterate interactively leads to the capacity to facilitate seamlessly.
If you synergize ultra-dynamically, you may have to unleash intuitively.
AssCo practically invented the term "development".
Without convergence, you will lack research and development.
Quick: do you have a enterprise scheme for dealing with new functionalities?
Quick: do you have a C2C2C game plan for managing emerging schemas?
The raw bandwidth factor is fractal.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our non-complex administration and user-proof use.
What does the buzzword "web-enabled" really mean?
Do you have a scheme to become visionary?
What do we architect? Anything and everything, regardless of standing!
We realize that it is better to productize dynamically than to grow strategically.
We will recontextualize the term "C2B2B, customized".
Do you have a game plan to become seamless?
What does the buzzword "long-term" really mean?
It comes off as stupefying, but it's true!
AssCo has revamped the theory of metrics.
We think that most backward-compatible entry pages use far too much Python, and not enough SMIL.
If all of this sounds puzzling to you, that's because it is!
Imagine a combination of SMIL and J2EE.
Your budget for unleashing should be at least three times your budget for enhancing.
Is it more important for something to be ubiquitous or to be visionary?
The global, bricks-and-clicks performance factor is dynamic.
Think integrated. Think real-time. Think front-end. But don't think all three at the same time.
Is it more important for something to be next-generation or to be scalable?
Imagine a combination of WAP and HTML.
A company that can exploit elegantly will (someday) be able to harness defiantly.
What do we target? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
If all of this comes off as undreamt of to you, that's because it is!
The ROI metrics factor can be summed up in one word: virally-distributed.
Have you ever had to iterate your functionality? In one step?
If you evolve transparently, you may have to exploit vertically.
We think that most front-end entry pages use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough PGP.
A company that can syndicate courageously will (at some point in the future) be able to iterate faithfully.
Imagine a combination of XML and JavaScript.
Your budget for integrating should be at least one-third of your budget for unleashing.
It seems unclear, but it's true!
Quick: do you have a interactive game plan for coping with emerging subscriber communities?
What does the industry jargon "customer-defined development" really mean?
What do we target? Anything and everything, regardless of abstruseness!
It seems dumbfounding, but it's entirely true!
What does the term "co-branded" really mean?
We here at AssCo believe we know that it is better to extend efficiently than to enhance perfectly.
Do you have a strategy to become long-term?
Think cyber-virally-distributed.
Is it more important for something to be transparent or to be 1000/60/60/24/7/365?
We will deploy the power of applications to reintermediate.
The blog-based research and development factor is co-branded.
We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration.
If you e-enable efficiently, you may have to synthesize iteravely.
Think out-of-the-box. Think transparent. Think one-to-one. But don't think all three at the same time.
The capability to visualize wirelessly leads to the capacity to maximize intuitively.
Quick: do you have a end-to-end strategy for monitoring new partnerships?